DOCSLIB.ORG

24-453-410 Aerospace Corr

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

72 Corinth 207 311 25 20 17 65 Desoto 7 Benton 231 61 4 15 Alcorn 53 117 Marshall Tishomingo 72 79 75 4 72 Huntsville 4 5 4 Tate 35 72A 4 Tippah 30 40 78 157 72 15 33 11 Tunica 7 Prentiss Decatur 431 35 30 24 79 36 24 24 3 30 1 227 25 Union 36 35 371 67 59 Panola 55 Oxford 75 6 43 33 Coahoma Lafayette 15 Pontotoc 6 6 Tupelo 157 6 5 69 Clarksdale 7 6 Quitman 75 9 Lee 278 15 41 Itawamba 91 411 3 32 1 32 49 9 25 13 91 31 Yalobusha 231 132 32 17 4 278 51 330 Chickasaw 25 65 7 278 69 32 Calhoun 21 Tallahatchie 35 Monroe Bolivar 8 78 15 8 75 11 8 Grenada 102 49W 8 8 45A Cleveland 18 13 79 1 8 Grenada 77 18 9 45 Clay 20 17 7 96 35 Webster 12 50 171 46 Leflore Montgomery 50 Sunflower 61 Birmingham 34 21 Greenwood 69 Columbus 43 82 Starkville 25 Indianola 17 Carroll 48 Lowndes 82 Choctaw 15 12 Hoover 9 Greenville 171 Oktibbeha 459 7 77 Washington 48 25 17 21 15 12 12 14 Tuscaloosa 59 12 35 17 12 Holmes Noxubee 119 25 9 77 22 Attala 49 Humphreys 14 14 1 5 145 Maine Sharkey 17 15 Winston 49E 51 77 1 431 25 31 14 14 22 139 71 17 2 1 65 49 2 397 19 69 3 Minnesot25a 82 50 45 North Dakota 191 2 Yazoo City 432 17 New York 5 4 9 33 165 Washington 3 2 35 Montana 22 22 63 2 Wisconsin 143 59 5 Michigan 6 231 134 Issaquena 16 16 14 Pennsylvania 280 146 2 1 Yazoo 16 16 South Dakota 29 39 79 Oregon 11 7 9 9 15 1.New Hampshire 7 Neshoba Idaho 14 Ohio 9 Kemper Wyoming Iowa 8 2.Vermont 16 Leake 15 West Virginia 17 43 Indiana 3.Massachusetts 170 Canton Nebraska Illinois Virginia 111 1 3 19 Madison 4.Rhode Island 229 14 33 35 22 14 25 Kentucky 5.Connecticut Shreveport 133 Nevada Missouri Lauderdale North Carolina 14 85 39 Utah Colorado Kansas 6.New Jersey Mississippi 169 80 Tennessee 7.Delaware Bossier City Monroe Madison South Carolina 8.Maryland 20 Ridgeland 14 22 California 34 481 Scott 69 Oklahoma Arkansas 9.Washington, DC 15 Rankin Newton 59 Georgia Montgomery 147 25 Meridian 5 Vicksburg 80 171 146 Clinton Alabama Arizona New Mexico Mississippi 9 20 17 17 Florida 26 7 Jackson Pearl 165 1 Warren Hinds Brandon 27 35 114 Texas 431 4 4 165 Louisiana 15 110 18 15 51 10 55 18 11 13 5 167 34 18 126 41 155 61 21 4 5 Gulf Coast Aerospace Corridor 128 10 27 331 29 51 18 Jasper 21 34 18 18 Clarke 59 45 Smith 17 5 15 10 263 49 1 9 Claiborne N Copiah Simpson 175 126 35 15 65 49 30 124 13 28 28 84 15 10 8 27 51 34 65 31 47 Jefferson 28 28 84 10 35 41 Laurel 10 84 21 8 28 550 13 6 33 123 Jones 8 Wayne 83 106 231 69 125 84 167 117 Brookhaven Covington 87 Natchez 105 84 Jefferson Davis 10 129 Franklin 15 51 124 583 189 125 Adams 27 1 71 33 56 Lincoln 42 63 Lawrence 27 431 95 28 55 17 13 35 98 42 21 27 42 43 8 Hattiesburg 59 44 84 586 15 52 107 McComb 27 57 Amite 583 87 Dothan 63 95 Forrest ALABAMA 27 24 Lamar 59 35 41 121 Greene 21 Wilkinson Marion 45 29 52 52 457 55 15 57 48 Perry 85 1 Pike 53 115 63 137 52 112 24 48 13 27 61 Walthall MISSISSIPPI 65 1 13 98 19 10 43 113 29 85 2 111 38 2 21 57 331 11 29 10 49 183 26 197 4 79 10 71 26 10 10 George 77 10 225 61 26 10 13 105 1 55 FLORIDA 16 67 97 Pearl River Stone 31 81 69 26 16 90 27 25 165 19 21 4 Mobile 14 77 110 16 10 11 7 10 16 43 57 87 85 285 167 12 10 29 19 17 Fernandina Beach 1 221 Harrison 63 200 27 JACKSON 10 41 13 21 49 81 190 90 79 145 2 109 Picayune COUNTY 87 71 190 Hancock 8 9 69 12 10 9 20 90 12 2 8 20 301 12 10 11 267 Tallahassee A1A 22 188 171 Ocean Springs 193 Pensacola 13 20 12 41 3 13 12 26 7 Moss Point 98 15 20 1 6 5 Long 1 6 7 20 27 10 Baton Rouge 1 4 5 79 71 12 35 4 Beach2 Gautier 6 Fort 13 2 10 Biloxi Pascagoula 231 Jacksonville 3 Gulfport 5 Walton 98 Atlantic Beach Beach 267 22 109 59 Jacksonville Beach Lake Charles LOUISIANA 10 13 90 Lafayette 55 12 Palm Valley 10 10 Panama City 65 375 90 Orange Park 98 Lake City 121 14 26 51 1 A1A 27 41 21 13 247 Middleburg 1 91 GULF of MEXICO 95 14 167 90 8 129 182 3 18 9 Kenner 71 319 14 47 100 14 New Orleans 27 65 27 20 Saint Augustine 47 35 82 70 19 1 27 98 349 24 82 21 51 27 82 Gainesville Palatka 20 A1A 24 56 20 121 19 1 57 Aerospace Parks 24 95 A1A 23 Military Bases 41 17 11 121 75 Ormond Beach 24 Aerospace Research 19 40 40 Daytona Beach South Daytona 1 Ocala Port Orange 19 De Land New Smyrna Beach 44 200 Edgewater Lady Lake Deltona DeBary Eustis 44 44 44 46 Sanford Leesburg 19 Apopka Winter Springs 98 3033 Pascagoula Street • P.O. Drawer 1558 • Pascagoula, MS 39568-1558 Altamonte Springs Titusville Gulf Coast Aerospace Corridor Phone: 228-769-6263 • Toll-Free: 1-800-362-0103 • Fax: 228-762-8431 Winter Park Winter Garden 50 33 19 Cocoa Kissimmee Rockledge 4 Cocoa Beach New Port Richey 17 Saint Cloud Satellite Beach Tarpon Springs Haines City Melbourne Oldsmar Lakeland Dunedin Winter Haven A1A Plant City Palm Bay 60 60 Largo 1 37 Bartow Pinellas Park Sebastian 60 Gulfport 674 Vero Beach 41 60 95 301 275 62 62 64 Palmetto 91 Bradenton64 64 98 Fort Pierce 441 70 A1A Sarasota 17 Port Saint Lucie 70 75 91 70 70 72 98 709 Stuart 31 78 1 Venice North Port 76 775 41 27 78 Punta Gorda Jupiter Palm Beach Gardens 78 Riviera Beach 31 80 West Palm Beach 80 880 884 Greenacres Fort Myers Lake Worth Cape Coral Boynton Beach 82 441 Delray Beach Boca Raton 29 95 Pompano Beach Tamarac 75 Naples 29 Plantation 41 Miramar North Miami Miami Beach Coral Gables Homestead 9336 1 1 Key West Gulf Coast Aerospace Corridor AEROSPACE PARKS 1 Sunplex Light Industrial Park Location: Highway 57, Ocean Springs, MS Overview: Location of more than 20 companies, including Northrop Grumman, Micro Methods and Ferson Technologies, the park is located between and within a mile of both I-10 and U.S. 90. The site is fully permitted. Contact: George Freeland, Executive Director, Jackson County Economic Development Foundation Mailing address: PO Drawer 1558, Pascagoula, MS, 39568-1558 E-mail: [email protected] or [email protected] Web site: www.jcedf.org Focus: Light industrial, including aerospace 2 Jackson County Aviation Technology Park Overview: Adjacent to the airport, the aviation park, formerly known as the Trent Lott Aviation Technology Park, is designed for aerospace-related businesses. The first tenant is Northrop Grumman Unmanned Systems Center, which builds Fire Scout drone helicopters and Global Hawk fixed-wing drones at the plant. Location: Moss Point, MS, adjacent to the Trent Lott International Airport Size: 300 acres Contact: George Freeland, Executive Director, Jackson County Economic Development Foundation Mailing address: PO Drawer 1558, Pascagoula, MS, 39568-1558 E-mail: [email protected] Web site: www.jcedf.org Focus: Aerospace technologies 3 Aerospace Technology Park Overview: Although still being developed, the park is a joint project of Stennis Space Center and the State of Mississippi. The first tenant is the Lockheed Martin Space and Technology Center. Adjacent to the park is the location where the Department of Defense had planned to locate the Space-Based Laser Performance Test Facility, though that project is on hold. Mailing address: NASA Center Operations, Building, 1100, Stennis Space Center, MS 39529 Phone: 228.688.2670 Focus: Aerospace-related companiess 4 Mississippi Army Ammunition Plant Industrial Complex Overview: Built in 1978 as an Army munitions plant, it became an industrial park in 1993. Building 9101 alone has 400,000 square feet. The facility is 8 miles from Interstate 59 to the west and Interstate 10 to the south. It is 45 miles from the Port of Gulfport and 20 from Port Bienville. It is 10 miles from Stennis International Airport, 45 miles from Gulfport-Biloxi International Airport and 55 miles from New Orleans International. Location: 45 miles northeast of New Orleans and 120 miles west of Mobile at Stennis Space Center, MS Size: 4,300 acres, 1.6 million square feet under one roof Tenants: Planning Systems Inc; Sverdrup Technology; Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne; Naval Oceanographic Office; JKS International, LLC; Power Dynamics Inc; Graebel/New Orleans Movers, Inc; Coastal Precision Machine Inc; Coastal Marine Equipment Inc; ACS Government Systems Inc; Entech Systems Inc; Mississippi Enterprise for Technology Mailing address: Building 9100, Stennis Space, Center, MS 39529-7099 Web site: http://www.msaap.com Stennis Space Center, MS 3033 Pascagoula Street • P.
Recommended publications
  • HLS 17RS-1433 ORIGINAL 2017 Regular Session HOUSE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 41 by REPRESENTATIVE GARY CARTER SPECIAL DAY/WEEK/MO

    HLS 17RS-1433 ORIGINAL 2017 Regular Session HOUSE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 41 by REPRESENTATIVE GARY CARTER SPECIAL DAY/WEEK/MO

    HLS 17RS-1433 ORIGINAL 2017 Regular Session HOUSE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 41 BY REPRESENTATIVE GARY CARTER SPECIAL DAY/WEEK/MONTH: Commends several Tulane University students upon winning NASA's BIG Idea Challenge competition 1 A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 2 To commend Tulane University students John Robertson, Otto Lyon, Benjamin Lewson, 3 Matthew Gorban, Ethan Gasta, Maxwell Woody, and Afsheen Sajjadi upon their 4 selection as winners of NASA's 2017 BIG Idea Challenge competition. 5 WHEREAS, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) is widely 6 regarded as the finest space exploration organization in the world and has an exceptional 7 reputation; and 8 WHEREAS, NASA hosts the BIG Idea Challenge, which is intended to produce 9 designs of crucial importance to manned spaceflight; and 10 WHEREAS, twenty-nine teams from top national universities submitted designs to 11 the BIG Idea Challenge competition; and 12 WHEREAS, the group of students representing Tulane designed a revolutionary solar 13 electric propulsion cargo transport spacecraft, called "The Sunflower", and submitted their 14 design to the BIG Idea Challenge competition in November of 2016; and 15 WHEREAS, in December of 2016, the students were selected to be among five 16 finalist teams and were invited to present their design before a panel of distinguished judges 17 at NASA's Langley research facility in Hampton, Virginia; and 18 WHEREAS, the judges selected the Tulane team and their design as the winner of 19 the BIG Idea Challenge competition; and Page 1 of
  • Ready to Roll Enlisted Aircrew Members Are Critical to C-130 Hercules Flight Testing

    Ready to Roll Enlisted Aircrew Members Are Critical to C-130 Hercules Flight Testing

    Click. Tweet. Like. citamn.afrc.af.mil @citizenairman @citizenairman Volume 71 No. 4 August 2019 Ready to Roll Enlisted Aircrew Members are Critical to C-130 Hercules Flight Testing Official Magazine of the Air Force Reserve From the Top @ AFRCCommander Chief’s View @ AFRC.CCC NEW LEADERS POISED TO ENHANCING TRUST IS DO GREAT THINGS FOR THE FIRST STEP THE COMMAND TO REFORMING THE The success of any organization and deploying ORGANIZATION depends on its leaders. The Air Force in support of Reserve is comprised of numerous units, U.S. Central In my last commentary, I rolled out three individual lines of and each has its own set of leaders. Some Command. effort – comprehensive readiness, deliberate talent management Lt. Gen. Richard Scobee passes the guidon to Col. Kelli Smiley, the new Lt. Gen. Richard Scobee and Chief Master Sgt. Timothy White meet with manage a section, others helm a num- Healy’s robust Air Reserve Personnel Center commander. Smiley is one of several new and enhancing organizational trust – to align with our strategic Reservists from the 624th Regional Support Group, Hickam Air Force bered Air Force, but all are leaders. We mobility back- senior leaders throughout the command. (Staff Sgt. Katrina M. Brisbin) priorities. Today, I want to focus on LOE3, enhancing organiza- Base, Hawaii. rely on each and every one to conduct ground and his tional trust. our day-to-day operations and provide time at the com- the challenges our Reservists face and During my most recent trip to Indo-Pacific Command, a opportunity to enhance trust in the organization, which directly outstanding support to our Airmen and batant commands make him well suited improve their quality of life.
  • Assessment of Data Used to Manage Real Property Assets (IG-11-024

    Assessment of Data Used to Manage Real Property Assets (IG-11-024

    AUGUST 4, 2011 AUDIT REPORT OFFICE OF AUDITS NASA INFRASTRUCTURE AND FACILITIES: ASSESSMENT OF DATA USED TO MANAGE REAL PROPERTY ASSETS OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL National Aeronautics and Space Administration REPORT NO. IG-11-024 (ASSIGNMENT NO. A-11-001-00) Final report released by: Paul K. Martin Inspector General Acronyms FERP Facilities Engineering and Real Property Division GAO Government Accountability Office GSA General Services Administration NPR NASA Procedural Requirements NTC NASA Technical Capabilities OIG Office of Inspector General O&M Operations and Maintenance RPMS Real Property Management System SPF Space Power Facility REPORT NO. IG-11-024 AUGUST 4, 2011 OVERVIEW NASA INFRASTRUCTURE AND FACILITIES: ASSESSMENT OF DATA USED TO MANAGE REAL PROPERTY ASSETS The Issue NASA’s real property holdings include approximately 5,000 buildings and structures such as wind tunnels, laboratories, launch pads, and test stands. In total, the assets occupy 44 million square feet and represent more than $26.4 billion in current replacement value.1 However, 80 percent of NASA’s facilities are 40 or more years old and many are in degraded condition. Moreover, NASA is dealing with the challenge of its aging infrastructure at a time of large and growing budget deficits that are straining the resources of all Federal agencies. As discretionary funding continues to decline, NASA will be required to make more prudent decisions regarding its infrastructure. In addition, the issue of the Agency’s aging infrastructure has been identified by NASA, the
  • Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide

    Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide

    Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide A Complete Compendium Of RV Dump Stations Across The USA Publiished By: Covenant Publishing LLC 1201 N Orange St. Suite 7003 Wilmington, DE 19801 Copyrighted Material Copyright 2010 Covenant Publishing. All rights reserved worldwide. Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide Page 2 Contents New Mexico ............................................................... 87 New York .................................................................... 89 Introduction ................................................................. 3 North Carolina ........................................................... 91 Alabama ........................................................................ 5 North Dakota ............................................................. 93 Alaska ............................................................................ 8 Ohio ............................................................................ 95 Arizona ......................................................................... 9 Oklahoma ................................................................... 98 Arkansas ..................................................................... 13 Oregon ...................................................................... 100 California .................................................................... 15 Pennsylvania ............................................................ 104 Colorado ..................................................................... 23 Rhode Island ...........................................................
  • Prestressed Concrete Girders Achieve Record Lengths Tacoma, Washington

    Prestressed Concrete Girders Achieve Record Lengths Tacoma, Washington

    THE CONCRETE BRIDGE MAGAZINE FALL 2019 www.aspirebridge.org WSDOT inspects 223-ft-long, 247-kip lightweight concrete girder Prestressed Concrete Girders Achieve Record Lengths Tacoma, Washington BRIDGES OF THE FOOTHILLS PARKWAY Great Smoky Mountains National Park DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER VETERANS MEMORIAL BRIDGE Anderson, Indiana MARC BASNIGHT BRIDGE Dare County, North Carolina COURTLAND STREET BRIDGE Atlanta, Georgia Permit No. 567 No. Permit Lebanon Junction, KY Junction, Lebanon Postage Paid Postage Presorted Standard Presorted OVER NEW I-35W BRIDGE I-91 BRATTLEBORO BRIDGE MINNESOTA 40 VERMONT YEARS PENOBSCOT NARROWS BRIDGE & OBSERVATORY HONOLULU RAIL TRANSIT PROJECT MAINE HAWAII 4TH STREET BRIDGE COLORADO AIRTRAIN JFK 410 NEW YORK SARAH MILDRED LONG BRIDGE MAINE/NEW HAMPSHIRE AWARDS FOR OUR CUSTOMERS ACROSS THE UNITED STATES I-280 VETERANS’ GLASS CITY SKYWAY VICTORY BRIDGE OHIO NEW JERSEY DAUPHIN ISLAND BRIDGE ALABAMA FOUR BEARS BRIDGE Creating Bridges As Art® NORTH DAKOTA www.figgbridge.com | 1 800 358 3444 NEW WINONA BRIDGE MINNESOTA VETERANS MEMORIAL BRIDGE TEXAS US 191 COLORADO RIVER BRIDGE I-76 ALLEGHENY RIVER BRIDGE UTAH PENNSYLVANIA I-275 SUNSHINE SKYWAY BRIDGE BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY VIADUCT FLORIDA NORTH CAROLINA SENATOR WILLIAM V. ROTH, JR. BRIDGE NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY ARCHES SOUTH NORFOLK JORDAN BRIDGE DELAWARE TENNESSEE VIRGINIA CONTENTS Features “A Shot in the Arm” 6 Armeni Consulting Services helps many clients address 10 estimating and scheduling challenges as the array of delivery and construction methods grows. Bridges of the Foothills Parkway 10 Dwight D. Eisenhower Veterans Memorial Bridge 14 Marc Basnight Bridge 18 Courtland Street Bridge 24 Departments Photo: Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division of the Federal Highway Administration.
  • Full-Time Maintainers Command Makes Strides Hiring Air Reserve Technicians

    Full-Time Maintainers Command Makes Strides Hiring Air Reserve Technicians

    Click. Tweet. Like. citamn.afrc.af.mil @citizenairman @citizenairman Volume 71 No. 6 December 2019 Full-time Maintainers Command makes strides hiring Air Reserve Technicians Official Magazine of the Air Force Reserve From the Top @ AFRCCommander Chief’s View @ AFRC.CCC STRENGTHENING YOUR THE COMMAND TEAM, SUPPORTING CHIEF'S NEW YEAR'S YOUR FAMILY CHALLENGE Heroes of the Air Force Reserve, Lt. Gen. Richard Season’s greetings Citizen Airmen! First off, the boss and Scobee high fives Being part of an outstanding team is I want to say thank you. Thank you for all you have done deployed members of an amazing feeling. I am honored to be a his Air Force Reserve throughout the year, and thank you for what you will continue part of this incredible Air Force Reserve family. ( Tech. Sgt. to do in the coming year. team. You, our Airmen, are highly skilled Robert Cloys) Your steadfast service, commitment and sacrifice are com- individuals, and your abilities are magni- mendable, and we couldn’t be more proud of you. fied when you work as a team. A strong The cohesion and effectiveness of command chief and I would like to be We had a couple of rough patches this past year; and without team can accomplish nearly anything. the operations-maintenance team was at every unit’s drill weekend this month a doubt, we will face challenges in the new year. Regardless the I’ve witnessed the achievements of visible to the entire wing. It was clear to personally thank you for all your hard challenge, like always, we will persevere because of Airmen like many great teams.
  • FEBRUARY 2012 ISSUE No

    FEBRUARY 2012 ISSUE No

    MILITARY AVIATION REVIEW FEBRUARY 2012 ISSUE No. 291 EDITORIAL TEAM COORDINATING EDITOR - BRIAN PICKERING WESTFIELD LODGE, ASLACKBY, SLEAFORD, LINCS NG34 0HG TEL NO. 01778 440760 E-MAIL”[email protected]” BRITISH REVIEW - GRAEME PICKERING 15 ASH GROVE, BOURNE, LINCS PE10 9SG TEL NO. 01778 421788 EMail "[email protected]" FOREIGN FORCES - BRIAN PICKERING (see Co-ordinating Editor above for address details) US FORCES - BRIAN PICKERING (COORDINATING) (see above for address details) STATESIDE: MORAY PICKERING 18 MILLPIT FURLONG, LITTLEPORT, ELY, CAMBRIDGESHIRE, CB6 1HT E Mail “[email protected]” EUROPE: BRIAN PICKERING OUTSIDE USA: BRIAN PICKERING See address details above OUT OF SERVICE - ANDY MARDEN 6 CAISTOR DRIVE, BRACEBRIDGE HEATH, LINCOLN LN4 2TA E-MAIL "[email protected]" MEMBERSHIP/DISTRIBUTION - BRIAN PICKERING MAP, WESTFIELD LODGE, ASLACKBY, SLEAFORD, LINCS NG34 0HG TEL NO. 01778 440760 E-MAIL.”[email protected]” ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION (Jan-Dec 2012) UK £40 EUROPE £48 ELSEWHERE £50 @MAR £20 (EMail/Internet Only) MAR PDF £20 (EMail/Internet Only) Cheques payable to “MAP” - ALL CARDS ACCEPTED - Subscribe via “www.mar.co.uk” ABBREVIATIONS USED * OVERSHOOT f/n FIRST NOTED l/n LAST NOTED n/n NOT NOTED u/m UNMARKED w/o WRITTEN OFF wfu WITHDRAWN FROM USE n/s NIGHTSTOPPED INFORMATION MAY BE REPRODUCED FROM “MAR” WITH DUE CREDIT EDITORIAL - Welcome to the February edition of MAR! This issue sees the United Kingdom 2012 Review from Graeme - a month later than usual due to his work commitments. Because of this the issue is somewhat truncated in the Foreign Section department, but we should catch up with the March issue.
  • United Through Reading Helps Service Members Stay Connected to the Children in Their Lives Through All of the Separations of Military Life

    United Through Reading Helps Service Members Stay Connected to the Children in Their Lives Through All of the Separations of Military Life

    United Through Reading helps Service Members stay connected to the children in their lives through all of the separations of military life. Whether separated due to duty, training, classes, work-shifts, or deployments, UTR is there to foster bonds, promote resiliency, and build literacy. Following is the list of units and locations participating in the United Through Reading program. CURRENT PROGRAM LOCATIONS: The following list represents the current locations for United Through Reading as of January 31, 2020. This list is updated monthly on our website. For specific information regarding the sites, please email the designated Program Manager, or contact us at [email protected], or 858-481-7323. * The acronym (PRS) denotes Permanent Recording Sites that are available for all Service Members to use. Please note: If live email link does not work for you, copy and paste designated email address into the address of a new email from your email account. U.S. Based Commands State City Base/Installation Command Site Info Branch Program Manager AK Fairbanks Fort Wainwright, Alaska Fort Wainwright Library PRS Army [email protected] AL Fort Rucker Djibouti 1-58th AOB Army [email protected] AL Mobile AL NG Armory AL NG Mobile National Guard [email protected] AZ Mesa AZ NG Armory 2-636rd TSBN National Guard [email protected] AZ Prescott Northern AZ VA Health Care System Northern AZ VA Health Care System PRS Medical [email protected] CA Camp Pendleton Camp Pendleton USS BOXER (VMM-163) Marines [email protected] CA Coronado NAS North
  • U.S. Money Laundering Threat Assessment (MLTA)

    U.S. Money Laundering Threat Assessment (MLTA)

    MONEY LAUNDERING THREAT ASSESSMENT WORKING GROUP Department of the Treasury Office of Terrorism and Financial Intelligence (TFI) • Office of Terrorist Financing & Financial Crime (TFFC) • Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) • Office of Intelligence and Analysis (OIA) • Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) • Executive Office for Asset Forfeiture (TEOAF) Internal Revenue Service (IRS) • Criminal Investigation (CI) • Small Business/Self Employed Division (SB/SE) Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) Criminal Division • Asset Forfeiture Money Laundering Section (AFMLS) National Drug Intelligence Center (NDIC) Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force (OCDETF) Department of Homeland Security Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System United States Postal Service (USPS) United States Postal Inspection Service (USPIS) U. S. Money Laundering Threat Assessment December 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS MONEY LAUNDERING THREAT ASSESSMENT Introduction ........................................................................................................................................i Banking ................................................................................................................................................ 1 Money Services Businesses ....................................................................................................... 7 Money Transmitters...........................................................................................................
  • Chapter 4: Environmental Consequences of Alternatives

    Chapter 4: Environmental Consequences of Alternatives

    Final Constellation Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement 4. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES OF ALTERNATIVES The potential environmental consequences of both the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s (NASA) Proposed Action (Preferred Alternative) to continue preparations for and to implement the Constellation Program, and the No Action Alternative, not continue preparations for nor implement the Constellation Program, are summarized in Chapter 2 and are presented in detail in this Chapter. In addition, this Chapter presents in Cumulative Impacts (see Section 4.3) the potential environmental consequences of two overlapping but individual NASA actions: implementing the Constellation Program and close-out of the Space Shuttle Program. 4.1 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED ACTION (PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE) Under the Proposed Action, NASA would continue preparations for and implement the Constellation Program. This Program would involve activities at many U.S. Government and commercial facilities. Although detailed aspects of the Constellation Program and the full scope of the activities that might occur at each facility are not fully known, the activities described in Section 2.1 present enough information to broadly estimate the nature of the potential environmental impacts that might occur if NASA implements the Proposed Action. Figure 2-2 presents a high-level summary of the major Constellation Program activities that would be expected to occur at each of the primary U.S. Government facilities, as well as commercial facilities with the potential for significant environmental impacts. Given the long-term nature of the Constellation Program, and NASA’s desire to utilize as much of the Space Shuttle Program infrastructure as practicable, it is expected that over time, many of the existing facilities currently used by the Space Shuttle Program and planned to be used for the Constellation Program would require maintenance, upgrading, renovation, and/or replacement.
  • NASA's Strategic Direction and the Need for a National Consensus

    NASA's Strategic Direction and the Need for a National Consensus

    NASA's Strategic Direction and the Need for a National Consensus NASAs Strategic Direction and the Need for a National Consensus Committee on NASAs Strategic Direction Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS Washington, D.C. www.nap.edu PREPUBLICATION COPYSUBJECT TO FURTHER EDITORIAL CORRECTION Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. NASA's Strategic Direction and the Need for a National Consensus THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance. This study is based on work supported by Contract NNH10CC48B between the National Academy of Sciences and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the agency that provided support for the project. International Standard Book Number-13: 978-0-309-XXXXX-X International Standard Book Number-10: 0-309-XXXXX-X Copies of this report are available free of charge from: Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences National Research Council 500 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 Additional copies of this report are available from the National Academies Press, 500 Fifth Street, NW, Keck 360, Washington, DC 20001; (800) 624-6242 or (202) 334-3313; http://www.nap.edu.
  • Director's Corner

    Director's Corner

    Summer Issue 2021 Director’s Corner Pg. 1 & 2 TSF Update Pg. 2 Gift Shop News Pg. 3 Hollywood & Ft. Rucker MUSEUM GIFT SHOP HOURS WEBSITE Pg. 4 & 5 Foundation Update Pg. 6 MONDAY - FRIDAY 9 - 4 MONDAY - FRIDAY Summer 2021 Pg. 7 SATURDAY 9 - 3 9 - 4 Membership Pg. 7 CLOSED FEDERAL HOLIDAYS. SATURDAY OPEN MEMORIAL DAY, 9 - 2:45 INDEPENDENCE DAY AND VETERANS DAY WWW.ARMYAVIATIONMUSEUM.ORG GIFT SHOP - CLICK ‘SHOP’ DIRECTOR’S CORNER Bob Mitchell, Museum Director reetings once again from the Army Aviation Museum! As we enter the summer season and the country opens back up, we are gearing up for a Army Aviation Museum Foundation G busy season. I noticed an unusually high volume of traffic on the interstate over the P.O. Box 620610 weekend and realized folks are eager to travel, visit family and trying to put 2020 in the Fort Rucker, AL 36362 rear view mirror. All this is good news for museums as well as others that count on attendance. This past Sunday, June 6th marked the anniversary of the D-Day landing, but it was also the 79th anniversary of the birth of Organic Army Aviation. General Order number 98 was signed giving the Ground Forces their own aircraft, pilots and mechanics as part of their Tables of Organization and Equipment (TO&E). Each Artillery unit would be authorized two aircraft, two pilots and one mechanic. These crews would travel and live with the unit in the field and provide reconnaissance, target spotting, medical evacuation and a host of other services.