DOCSLIB.ORG

ASIST-Asia Pacific a Programme for Optimising Sustainable Employment in the Construction and Infrastructure Sectors

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ASIST-Asia Pacific a Programme for Optimising Sustainable Employment in the Construction and Infrastructure Sectors ASIST-Asia Pacific a programme for optimising sustainable employment in the construction and infrastructure sectors Houshold Survey Report of five selected Sekong Villages Internet Version 1 INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANIZATION Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Background ......................................................................................................................................................... 2 1.1.1 Integrated Rural Accessibility Planning (IRAP) ........................................................................................... 2 1.1.2 IRAP in Sekong province ............................................................................................................................ 2 1.1.3 Sekong Indigenous People’s Development Program (SIP-Dev).................................................................... 3 1.1.4 Base-line village level survey ...................................................................................................................... 3 1.1.5 Selection of pilot villages ............................................................................................................................ 3 1.2 In-depth household survey.................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1.1 Objectives................................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1.2 Survey tools................................................................................................................................................ 5 1.3 Sekong Province .................................................................................................................................................. 6 1.1.3 Dakchung District....................................................................................................................................... 7 1.1.4 Kalum District ............................................................................................................................................ 7 1.4 Sample representativeness.................................................................................................................................... 8 1.1.5 Households representativeness of the village situation.................................................................................. 8 1.1.6 Village representativeness of the district situation ........................................................................................ 8 Socio-economic Characteristics ......................................................................................................................................10 2.1 General characteristics ........................................................................................................................................10 2.1.1 Sample household composition...................................................................................................................10 2.1.2 Settlement and migration............................................................................................................................13 2.1.3 Spoken dialects..........................................................................................................................................15 2.1.4 Household belongings................................................................................................................................16 2.2 Education ...........................................................................................................................................................17 2.3 Water .................................................................................................................................................................21 2.4 Health.................................................................................................................................................................23 2.5 Agriculture .........................................................................................................................................................27 2.5.1 Main crops produced..................................................................................................................................27 2.5.2 Main crops sold or bartered ........................................................................................................................28 2.5.3 Food consumption and rice self-sufficiency.................................................................................................29 2.5.4 Upland rice cultivation (Rai) ......................................................................................................................32 2.5.5 Lowland rice cultivation (Naa) ...................................................................................................................34 2.5.6 Cassava .....................................................................................................................................................36 2.5.7 Maize ........................................................................................................................................................37 2.5.8 Busiest cultivation period ...........................................................................................................................38 2.5.9 Help from others........................................................................................................................................39 2.5.10 Livestock...................................................................................................................................................40 2.6 Activities ............................................................................................................................................................44 2.6.1 Main sources of cash income......................................................................................................................44 2.6.2 Main non farm activities.............................................................................................................................46 2.6.3 Non farm produces sold or bartered ............................................................................................................47 2.7 Consumption ......................................................................................................................................................49 2.7.1 Basic product consumption.........................................................................................................................49 2.7.2 Medicine consumption ...............................................................................................................................50 2.8 Expenditures.......................................................................................................................................................50 2.9 Market................................................................................................................................................................52 2.10 Household problems .......................................................................................................................................53 2.11 Households’ perception of their situation.........................................................................................................55 Transport pattern ...........................................................................................................................................................58 3.1 Firewood ............................................................................................................................................................60 3.2 Building materials...............................................................................................................................................62 3.3 Water .................................................................................................................................................................63 3.4 Upland rice transport (Rai) ..................................................................................................................................64 3.5 Lowland rice transport (Naa) ...............................................................................................................................65 3.6 First and second main crops other than rice transport............................................................................................66 3.7 Transport pattern per annum................................................................................................................................67 3.7.1 Number of trips per annum.........................................................................................................................69 3.7.2 Time per annum.........................................................................................................................................70 3.7.3 Distance per annum....................................................................................................................................70
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Endemic Malaria in Four Villages in Attapeu Province, Lao Pdr
    ENDEMIC MALARIA IN LAO VILLAGES ENDEMIC MALARIA IN FOUR VILLAGES IN ATTAPEU PROVINCE, LAO PDR R Phetsouvanh1, I Vythilingam2, B Sivadong1, S Lokman Hakim2, ST Chan2 and S Phompida1 1Center for Malaria, Parasitology and Entomology, Vientiane, Lao PDR; 2Institute for Medical Research, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Abstract. A study was conducted in four villages in Attapeu Province, Lao PDR in 2002 to determine malaria endemicity. The study villages were Mixay, Beng Phoukham, Phou Vong and Pier Geo. Mass blood surveys were conducted in May, August, and October. Finger prick blood was collected for thick and thin blood film as well as for dipstick. The slide positivity rate was highest in Phou Hom in October (41.7%). Plasmodium falciparum was the dominant species comprising more than 80% of the cases. As a whole, the distribution of malaria was similar among males and females. Children below 15 years accounted for a large percentage of the cases. The sensitivity of the optimal dipstick was 62.36 and the specificity was 61.7. Microscopy was taken as the gold standard. Anopheles dirus was found to be the main vector and the vectorial capacity correlated well with the cases. INTRODUCTION entomological and blood examination 3 times during the year. In this report the results of the Malaria is a serious public health problem blood survey are presented. in Lao PDR (Pholsena, 1992) which is a land- locked country bordering Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia, Myanmar, and China. The actual ma- MATERIALS AND METHODS laria situation in the country remains unknown. Study area However, it is said that about 300,000 confirmed and suspected cases of malaria are reported each Attapeu Province is situated in the southern year (Phetsouvanh et al, 2000).The malaria situ- tip of Lao PDR and has common borders with ation varies from province to province and also Cambodia to the south, Vietnam to the east, village to village within one province.
    [Show full text]
  • Malaria Transmission by Anopheles Dirus in Attapeu Province, Lao Pdr
    MALARIA TRANSMISSION BY AN. DIRUS IN LAO PDR MALARIA TRANSMISSION BY ANOPHELES DIRUS IN ATTAPEU PROVINCE, LAO PDR B Sidavong1, I Vythilingam2, R Phetsouvanh1, ST Chan2, T Phonemixay1, S Lokman Hakim2 and S Phompida1 1Center for Malaria, Parasitology and Entomology, Vientiane, Lao PDR; 2Institute for Medical Research, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Abstract. A study was carried out in four malaria-endemic villages in Attapeu Province, in the southern region of Lao PDR. All-night human landing collections were carried out in May, August, and October 2002, to determine malaria vectors. At the same time, mass blood surveys were also carried out in the same villages. Anopheles dirus was the predominant species in three of the study villages. Sporozoites were found only in An. drius from Phou Hom. However, in Beng Phoukham, An. dirus was positive for oocysts. The distribution of malaria cases was highest in Phou Hom and this correlated well with the vectorial capacity of An. dirus. The risk for infection from An. dirus was also high, at 0.99. INTRODUCTION Mekong Region. Since An. dirus has been found in Sekong, which is a province in the south, we Malaria is a serious public health problem wanted to determine how far south An. dirus was in Lao PDR, which is a landlocked country. Most present. malaria cases are reported from the provinces south of Vientiane, the capital of Lao PDR. Very Attapeu Province is the southern-most prov- little is known about the malaria vectors in Lao ince of Lao PDR, and it has common borders with PDR, as mosquito dissections have not been car- Vietnam and Cambodia.
    [Show full text]
  • Laos and Ethnic Minority Cultures: Promoting Heritage Edited by Yves Goudineau
    Laos and Ethnic Minority Cultures: Promoting Heritage Edited by Yves Goudineau UNESCO PUBLISHING MEMORY OF PEOPLES 34_Laos_GB_INT 26/06/03 10:24 Page 1 Laos and Ethnic Minority Cultures 34_Laos_GB_INT 26/06/03 10:24 Page 3 Laos and Ethnic Minority Cultures: Promoting Heritage Edited by YVES GOUDINEAU Memory of Peoples | UNESCO Publishing 34_Laos_GB_INT 7/07/03 11:12 Page 4 The authors are responsible for the choice and the presentation of the facts contained in this book and for the opinions expressed therein, which are not necessarily those of UNESCO and do not commit the Organization. The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNESCO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. UNESCO wishes to express its gratitude to the Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs for its support to this publication through the UNESCO/Japan Funds-in-Trust for the Safeguarding and Promotion of Intangible Heritage. Published in 2003 by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization 7, place de Fontenoy F-75352 Paris 07 SP Plate section: Marion Dejean Cartography and drawings: Marina Taurus Composed by La Mise en page Printed by Imprimerie Leclerc, Abbeville, France ISBN 92-3-103891-5 © UNESCO 2003 Printed in France 34_Laos_GB_INT 26/06/03 10:24 Page 5 5 Foreword YVES GOUDINEAU It is quite clear to every observer that Laos owes part of its cultural wealth to the unique diversity which resides in the bosom of the different populations that have settled on its present territory down the ages, bringing with them a mix of languages, beliefs and aesthetic traditions.
    [Show full text]
  • 25-6 Drainage System
    Final Report The Study on Vientiane Water Supply Development Project Figure 25-6 Drainage System Legend River, Canal, Trench, Natural Swamp Planned Drain Cannal Reservoir Irrigation Canal Thatluang Irrigation Pumping Station Swamp Boundary of Master Plan Source: Vientiane Urban Development Master Plan, Urban Research Institute, MCTPC 2 - 43 Final Report The Study on Vientiane Water Supply Development Project 2.5.3 GDP Projection An accurate long-term projection of the GDP is necessary for formulating the future framework of the socio-economic structure in the project sites. Official economic projections in “Five-year National Development Plan 2001-2005” and “Long-term Development Plan 2001-2020” were described in Section 5.1. The Five-year Plan has a more specific projection that includes sectoral scenarios, but the “Long-term Plan” shows overall targets for the year 2020. In this study, then, the future projections are based on the “Five-year Plan” projection scenario. The criteria for the projection are assumed as follows. (1) That major sectors grow at the following annual rates until 2005 as proposed in the “Five-year Plan”: 4.5% in the agricultural sector, 10.5% in the industrial sector, 8.5% in the services sector and a 7.0% rise from import duties. As a result, the GDP is expected to grow at 7.0% per annum on average during the planned period. (2) That after 2005, the respective sectors grow at the same rates as set in the “Five-year Plan” until the target year 2020. The GDP projected with the above assumptions are shown in Table 25-1.
    [Show full text]
  • Prime Minister's Office ( PMO ) Ministry Planning and Investment (MPI)
    List Participants High Level Round Table Meeting 2010 20-21 October 2010, Don Chan Palace Hotel Vientiane, Lao PDR National Assembly (NA) 1. H.E. Dr. Saysomphone Phomvihane Vice President / Foreign Affairs Committee Head of Committee National Assembly 2. H.E. Mr. Thongteun Xaiyasene Chief of Cabinet Cabinet of National Assembly 3. H.E. Mr. Khamsing Xayakone Head of Committee Economy and Financial Committee 4. H.E. Phd Dr. Phonethep Pholsena Vice of Committee Culture and Social Committee Prime Minister’s Office ( PMO ) 5. H.E. Mr. Cheuang Sombounkhan Minister to PMO Director General of the Office of Government Secretariat 6. H.E. Ms. Bounpheng Mounphoxay Minister to PMO Chairperson of PACSA 7. H.E. Mr. Khammoune Viphongxay Vice-ŒChairperson PACSA 8. H.E. Mr. Khamouane Boupha Minister to PMO Chairperson of National Land Management Authority 9. H.E. Mr. Meck Phanlack Acting President National Leading Committee Office for Rural Development and Poverty Reduction 10. H.E. Ms. Khempheng Pholsena Minister to PMO / Water Resource and Environment Chiarperson Administration 11. H.E. Dr. Bouasy Lorvansay President State Audit Authority 12. Mr. Phoukhieo Chanthasonboune National Project National Regulatory Authority for Director UXO/Mine Action Sector in Lao PDR 13. Ms. Monemany NHOYBOUAKONG Permanent Water Resources and Environment Secretary Administration 14. Mr. Nisith KEOPHANYA Director General Public Administration and Civil Service Authority Ministry Planning and Investment (MPI) 15. H.E. Dr. Sinlavong Khoutphaythoune Minister Ministry of Planning and Investment 16. H.E. Dr. Bounthavy Sisouphanthong Vice Minister Ministry of Planning and Investment 17. Dr. Kikeo CHANHTHABOULY Permanent Ministry of Planning and Investment Secretary 18.
    [Show full text]
  • Sekong, Sesan and Srepok River Basin Energy Profile
    Sekong, Sesan and Srepok River Basin energy profile Courtney Weatherby, Brian Eyler INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE About IUCN IUCN is a membership Union uniquely composed of both government and civil society organisations. It provides public, private and non-governmental organisations with the knowledge and tools that enable human progress, economic development and nature conservation to take place together. Created in 1948, IUCN is now the world’s largest and most diverse environmental network, harnessing the knowledge, resources and reach of more than 1,300 Member organisations and some 15,000 experts. It is a leading provider of conservation data, assessments and analysis. Its broad membership enables IUCN to fill the role of incubator and trusted repository of best practices, tools and international standards. IUCN provides a neutral space in which diverse stakeholders including governments, NGOs, scientists, businesses, local communities, indigenous peoples organisations and others can work together to forge and implement solutions to environmental challenges and achieve sustainable development. Working with many partners and supporters, IUCN implements a large and diverse portfolio of conservation projects worldwide. Combining the latest science with the traditional knowledge of local communities, these projects work to reverse habitat loss, restore ecosystems and improve people’s well-being. www.iucn.org https://twitter.com/IUCN/ Sekong, Sesan and Srepok River Basin energy profile Courtney Weatherby, Brian Eyler The designation of geographical entities in this Citation: Weatherby, C., Eyler, B. (2020). report, and the presentation of the materials, do Sekong,Sesan and Srepok Basin Energy Profile. not imply the expression of any opinion Hanoi, Viet Nam: IUCN Viet Nam Country Office.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf | 492.71 Kb
    Lao PDR: Floods Humanitarian Country Team Information Bulletin No.3 (as of 5 October 2018) This bulletin covers the entire country, with significant focus on Attapeu province. It is produced by the Office of the UN Resident Coordinator in Lao PDR in collaboration with humanitarian partners. Summary • 133,405 households and 648,605 individuals have been affected by the flooding resulting from tropical storms Sontinh and Bebinca and the sustained rainfalls, according to the latest Government reports. A total of 16,739 people have been evacuated from their villages. With the rainy season expected to continue into November, these numbers could increase. It is expected that the emergency response will be ongoing until the rainy season has ended. At the same time, the early recovery phase has started. • Across the country, over 90,000 ha of paddy fields and 11,000 ha of other plantations have been destroyed. Currently, villagers depend on food from forests and rivers. Price hikes of food commodities (30-50% increase) have been observed in places where access was limited due to the floods. In Attapeu, the floods have reduced agricultural opportunities for both farmers and laborers, leaving a thick layer of mud on the top of the paddy fields, negatively affecting the soil fertility. • Priority public health concerns have been reported in Attapeu province. 93 malnutrition cases have been reported in Sanamxay district (76 of Moderate Acute Malnutrition and 17 of Severe Acute Malnutrition), clusters of influenza-like illness cases have been detected in Pindong camp, and a dengue death has been reported in Sanamxay district on 11 September.
    [Show full text]
  • WFP Lao PDR Country Brief USA, Australia, Japan, France, Russia, Global Agriculture August 2019 and Food Security Programme, Government of Lao PDR, Private Donors
    WFP Lao PDR In Numbers Country Brief August 2019 US$ 1.58 million six-month (Sept 2019 – Feb 2020) net funding requirements 137.088 mt of food assistance distributed 24,484 people assisted 50% 50% Operational Updates • Flood update: During 29 August – 2 September 2019, heavy rainfall from Tropical Storm PODUL and Operational Context Tropical Depression KAJIKI resulted in widespread Lao PDR is a least developed country, ranking 139 out of flooding being reported in six provinces in southern 189 countries in the 2017 Human Development Index. It Lao PDR (Khammouane, Attapeu, Saravan, Sekong, has one of the lowest population densities in Asia. 23 Savannakhet and Champasack Provinces). As of 9 percent of the population lives below the national September 2019, an estimated 397,000 people have poverty line (USD 1.25/day), with a gross national been affected with 88,000 people displaced and 14 income per capita of USD 2,270 (World Bank 2017). The people have died. WFP is providing logistics support country is ranked 64 out of 144 in the Global Gender for the distribution of 400 mt of rice from the ASEAN Gap Index 2017. Plus Three Emergency Rice Reserve (APTERR) to the While Lao PDR has managed to reduce the proportion affected area. As of 10 September 2019, no official of hungry poor to 23 percent, the 2015 Global Hunger request for assistance from the Government has Index still rates hunger levels as “serious”. been received by the UN Country Team, however, Climate change is a key challenge facing rural livelihoods, and the country is vulnerable to climate WFP is closely monitoring the situation and is ready change due to its low adaptability and its dependence to respond.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Environmental Description of the Project Area
    Pakbo – Saravan 115 kV Transmission Line 4 ENVIRONMENTAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT AREA Savannakhet and Saravan provinces are located in the Southern of Lao PDR. Savannakhet has a total area of 21,774 km2, and is bordered by Saravan Province in the south, Khammouane Province in the north, Vietnam to the east and Thailand to the west. Savannakhet is divided into 15 districts. Saravan is about half the size of Savannakhet, with a total area of 10,691 km2, which is divided into 8 districts and located to the south of Savannakhet and north of Sekong province (with Vietnam and Thailand on the east and west, respectively) (NSC, 2007). The transmission line ROW will traverse through seven districts, four of which are in Savannakhet province (Kaysone, Champhone, Xaiphouthong and Songkhonee) districts, and three in Saravan Province (Lakhonphen, Vapi and Saravan) districts (see Figure 2-1 The Project Area). The general terrain of these areas is flat and mainly used for agricultural practices (NSC, 2007). 4.1 Physical Resources 4.1.1 Topography and Drainage The Project is located in the Mekong Floodplain, where the topography of the land is generally flat and low-lying. The topography of Savannakhet Province varies from the low-lying floodplains of the Mekong River in the west to foothills and the mountains of the annamite chain in the east. The average height above sea level varies across the province, from 100 masl in the west to about 1300 masl in the east (IUCN, 2008; Somphong, 2004). The Project Area is located on the floodplains in the western part of Savannakhet.
    [Show full text]
  • Mekong Integrated Water Resource Management (M-IWRM) Project
    Lao People’s Democratic Republic Peace Independence Democracy Unity Prosperity Public Disclosure Authorized Mekong Integrated Water Resource Management (M-IWRM) Project Public Disclosure Authorized ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK (ESMF) Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized March 9, 2017 (Revised March 12, 2021) PREFACE This Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF) for Lao PDR is being applied to all activities financed by the World Bank (WB) for technical and/or financial support from the Mekong Integrated Water Resource Management (M-IWRM) Project. This updated version of the ESMF applies to both ongoing activities funded under the additional financing (AF) and new activities to be funded under the Project restructuring. The restructuring extends the Project duration by another eleven months. The national Project Management Unit (PMU) of the Department of Water Resources (DWR), under the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment (MONRE), is responsible for overall coordination of Lao PDR activities. The respective PMUs of the Department of Livestock and Fisheries (DLF) and the Department of Irrigation (DOI) of the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (MAF) are responsible for implementation of specific subcomponents and for ensuring compliance with the Ethnic Group Planning Framework (EGPF), including keeping proper documentation in the project file for possible review by the WB. This ESMF has been progressively revised to reflect the scope of Project activities under the original project, the AF, and the restructuring. Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF) 1 Mekong-Integrated Water Resource Management (M-IWRM) Project Mekong Integrated Water Resource Management (M-IWRM) Project Table of Contents PREFACE......................................................................................................................... 1 List of Abbreviations and Acronyms ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Lao PDR 2015 Census-Based Poverty Map – June 2016 3 Authors Harold Coulombe, Consultant, World Bank Michael Epprecht, Centre for Development and Environment (CDE) Obert Pimhidzai, Economist, GPV02, World Bank Vilaysouk Sisoulath – Director of Research and Analysis Division, Social Statistics Department, LSB Supervisors Dr. Samaychanh Boupha - Vice Minister, Head of Lao Statistics Bureau Phonesaly Souksavath, Deputy Head of Lao Statistics Bureau Thirakha Chanthalanouvong, Deputy Director General of Social Statistics Department, LSB Salman Zaidi - Practice Manager, GPV02, World Bank Copyright © 2016 by Ministry of Planning and Investment, Lao Statistics Bureau Ban Sithan Neua, Souphanoungvong Road Vientiane Capital, Lao PDR Tel: + 856 21 214740; 242023 Fax: + 856 21 242022; 219129 Email: [email protected] Webpage: http://www.lsb.gov.la 4 Lao PDR 2015 Census-Based Poverty Map – June 2016 Abstract This report documents the construction of, and presents the main results from a poverty map of Lao PDR based on the 2012/13 LECS-5 survey and the 2015 Population and Housing Census. Monetary and non-monetary poverty indicators are presented at two different administrative levels: province and district. The non-monetary poverty indicators – closely related to the SDGs – were easily calculated directly from the Census databases. However, monetary poverty indicators are more challenging to compute as no income or expenditure information was collected by the Census. Based on a statistical methodology linking survey and Census datasets, poverty headcount and other monetary poverty indicators have been estimated at local levels. Two main findings stand out from the analysis of the results.
    [Show full text]
  • Sekong Province, Lao
    natural regenerationforests. maintaining of highlighting theeconomicvalue by budgets concerns intotheirpolicies,plans,and economic sectorstointegratebiodiversity this study wastoinfluencedevelopmentand forests in Sekong Province.Themainobjective of conserving calculate theeconomicreturnsfrom IUCN and WWF jointly carriedoutastudy to priorities and developmentneedsinLaoPDR, links betweenbiodiversityandcurrentsectoral To inform this debate, andtodemonstratethe current andfuturegenerations. biodiversity and protecting thelivelihoodsof allowed toregeneratenaturallytherebyfavouring provincial income, orwhethertheyshould be forests toincreaselong-termnationaland forests shouldbetransformedintoplantation an ongoing debate aboutwhetherdegraded on NTFPharvestingfortheirlivelihoods,thereis communities given thehighdependenceoflocal developing reforestation programmes.However, and burn and The effortsincludereducingslash cover. forest undertaken inLaoPDRtoincrease being how local livelihoodsandsomeeffortsare importance ofprotectingwatershedsandsecuring There is howeveragrowingrecognitionofthe livelihoods. local and biodiversity not itsimportancefor mostly perceived intermsofitscommercialvalue, undervalue the forestasaresource.Theis major reason is thatdecisionmakersheavily 100,000-200,000 hectaresperyear(MAF,1990).A of figure issteadilydecreasingatanaveragerate its high forest cover (>50%). However,this Among countries inAsia,LaoPDRisnotedfor Lao PDR The richyetundervaluedforestsof conserving naturalforests economic returnsfrom LAO PDR: SEKONG PROVINCE,
    [Show full text]