The Cray Extended Architecture Series of Computer Systems, 1988
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
CRAY X-MP Series of Computer Systems
For close to a decade, Cray Research has been the industry leader in large-scale computer systems. Today, about 70 percent of all supercomputers installed worldwide are Cray systems. They are used in advanced scientific and research Eaboratories around the world and have gained strong acceptance in diverse industrial environments. No other manufacturer has Cray Research's breadth of success and experience in supercomputer development. The company's initial product, the CRAY-I Computer System, was first installed in 1976and quickly became the standard for large-scale scientific computers -and the first commercially successful vector processor. For some time previously, the potential advantages of vector processing had been understood, but effective practical implementation had eluded computer architects. The CRAY-1 broke that barrier, and today vectorization techniques are used commonly by scientists and engineers in a wide variety of disciplines. The field-proven GRAY X-MP Computer Systems now offer significantly more power tosolve new and bigger problems while providing better value than any other systems available. Large memory size options allow a wider range of problems to be solved, while innovative multiprocessor design provides practical opportunities to exploit multitasking, the next dimension of parallel processing beyond vectorization. Once again, Cray Research, has moved supercomputing forward, offering new levels of hardware performance and software techniques to serve the needs of scientists and engineers today and in the future. Introducing the CRAY X-MP Series of Computer Systems Announcing expanded capabilities to serve the needs of a broadening marketplace: the CRAY X-MP Series of Computer Systems. The CRAY X-MP Series now comprises nine models, ranging from a uniprocessor version with one million words of central memory to a top-end system with four processors and a 16-million-word memory. -
(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,340,897 B1 Lytle Et Al
USOO6340897B1 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,340,897 B1 Lytle et al. (45) Date of Patent: *Jan. 22, 2002 (54) PROGRAMMABLE LOGICARRAY FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS INTEGRATED CIRCUIT WITH GENERAL EP OO81917 8/1983 PURPOSE MEMORY CONFIGURABLE ASA EP O410759 A2 1/1991 RANDOM ACCESS OR FIFO MEMORY EP O415542 A2 3/1991 (75) Inventors: Craig S. Lytle, Mountain View; (List continued on next page.) Donald F. Faria, San Jose, both of CA (US) OTHER PUBLICATIONS Matsumoto, Rodney T., “Configurable On-Chip RAM (73) ASSignee: Altera Corporation, San Jose, CA Incorporated into Hign Speed Logic Array," IEEE Custom (US) Integrated Circuits Conference, Jun. 1985, CH2157–6/85/ (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this 0000–0240, pp. 240–243. patent is extended or adjusted under 35 Landry, Steve, “Application-Specific ICs, Relying on RAM, U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days. Implement Almost Any Logic Function,” Electronic Design, Oct. 31, 1985, pp. 123–130. This patent is Subject to a terminal dis Bursky, Dave, “Shrink Systems with One-Chip Decoder, claimer. EPROM, and RAM,” Electronic Design, Jul. 28, 1988, pp. 91-94. (21) Appl. No.: 09/481,781 Kawana, Keiichi et al., “An Efficient Logic Block Intercon nect Architecture for User-Reprogrammable Gate Array,” (22) Filed: Jan. 11, 2000 IEEE 1990 Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, May Related U.S. Application Data 1990, CH2860–5/90/0000–0164, pp. 31.3.1-4 (List continued on next page.) (63) Continuation of application No. 08/707,705, filed on Jul. 24, 1996, now Pat. No. 6,049,223, which is a continuation-in Primary Examiner Michael Tokar part of application No. -
Internet Engineering Task Force January 18-20, 1989 at University
Proceedings of the Twelfth Internet Engineering Task Force January 18-20, 1989 at University of Texas- Austin Compiled and Edited by Karen Bowers Phill Gross March 1989 Acknowledgements I would like to extend a very special thanks to Bill Bard and Allison Thompson of the University of Texas-Austin for hosting the January 18-20, 1989 IETF meeting. We certainly appreciated the modern meeting rooms and support facilities made available to us at the new Balcones Research Center. Our meeting was especially enhanced by Allison’s warmth and hospitality, and her timely response to an assortment of short notice meeting requirements. I would also like to thank Sara Tietz and Susie Karlson of ACE for tackling all the meeting, travel and lodging logistics and adding that touch of class we all so much enjoyed. We are very happy to have you on our team! Finally, a big thank you goes to Monica Hart (NRI) for the tireless and positive contribution she made to the compilation of these Proceedings. Phill Gross TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. CHAIRMANZS MESSAGE 2. IETF ATTENDEES 3. FINAL AGENDA do WORKING GROUP REPORTS/SLIDES UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-AUSTIN JANUARY 18-20, 1989 NETWORK STATUS BRIEFINGS AND TECHNICAL PRESENTATIONS O MERIT NSFNET REPORT (SUSAN HARES) O INTERNET REPORT (ZBIGNIEW 0PALKA) o DOEESNET REPORT (TONY HAIN) O CSNET REPORT (CRAIG PARTRIDGE) O DOMAIN SYSTEM STATISTICS (MARK LOTTOR) O SUPPORT FOR 0SI PROTOCOLS IN 4.4 BSD (ROB HAGENS) O TNTERNET WORM(MICHAEL KARELS) PAPERS DISTRIBUTED AT ZETF O CONFORMANCETESTING PROFILE FOR D0D MILITARY STANDARD DATA COMMUNICATIONS HIGH LEVEL PROTOCOL ~MPLEMENTATIONS (DCA CODE R640) O CENTER FOR HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING (U OF TEXAS) Chairman’s Message Phill Gross NRI Chair’s Message In the last Proceedings, I mentioned that we were working to improve the services of the IETF. -
RATFOR User's Guide B
General Disclaimer One or more of the Following Statements may affect this Document This document has been reproduced from the best copy furnished by the organizational source. It is being released in the interest of making available as much information as possible. This document may contain data, which exceeds the sheet parameters. It was furnished in this condition by the organizational source and is the best copy available. This document may contain tone-on-tone or color graphs, charts and/or pictures, which have been reproduced in black and white. This document is paginated as submitted by the original source. Portions of this document are not fully legible due to the historical nature of some of the material. However, it is the best reproduction available from the original submission. Produced by the NASA Center for Aerospace Information (CASI) NASA CONTRACTOR REPORT 166601 Ames RATFOR User's Guide b Leland C. Helmle (NASA—CH-166601) RATFOR USERS GUIDE 0 (Informatics General Corp,) N85-16490 51 p HC A04/mZ A01 CSCL 09B Unclas G3/61 13243 CONTRACT NAS2— 11555 January 1985 v NASA NASA CONTRACTOR REPORT 166601 *i Ames RATF'OR User's Guide Leland C. Helmle Informatics General Corporation 1121 San Antonio Road Palo Alto, CA 94303 i i _I Prepared for Ames Research Center under Contract NAS2-11555 i n ASA National Aeronautics and 1 Space Administration Ames Research Center Moffett Field, California 94035 '^ I I w Ames R.A.TFOR User's Guide Version 2.0 by Loland C. Helmle Informatics General Corporation July 16, 1983 Prepared under Contract NA52-11555, Task 101 ^ Table of Contents page v 1 Introduction . -
Cielo Computational Environment Usage Model
Cielo Computational Environment Usage Model With Mappings to ACE Requirements for the General Availability User Environment Capabilities Release Version 1.1 Version 1.0: Bob Tomlinson, John Cerutti, Robert A. Ballance (Eds.) Version 1.1: Manuel Vigil, Jeffrey Johnson, Karen Haskell, Robert A. Ballance (Eds.) Prepared by the Alliance for Computing at Extreme Scale (ACES), a partnership of Los Alamos National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories. Approved for public release, unlimited dissemination LA-UR-12-24015 July 2012 Los Alamos National Laboratory Sandia National Laboratories Disclaimer Unless otherwise indicated, this information has been authored by an employee or employees of the Los Alamos National Security, LLC. (LANS), operator of the Los Alamos National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC52-06NA25396 with the U.S. Department of Energy. The U.S. Government has rights to use, reproduce, and distribute this information. The public may copy and use this information without charge, provided that this Notice and any statement of authorship are reproduced on all copies. Neither the Government nor LANS makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any liability or responsibility for the use of this information. Bob Tomlinson – Los Alamos National Laboratory John H. Cerutti – Los Alamos National Laboratory Robert A. Ballance – Sandia National Laboratories Karen H. Haskell – Sandia National Laboratories (Editors) Cray, LibSci, and PathScale are federally registered trademarks. Cray Apprentice2, Cray Apprentice2 Desktop, Cray C++ Compiling System, Cray Fortran Compiler, Cray Linux Environment, Cray SHMEM, Cray XE, Cray XE6, Cray XT, Cray XTm, Cray XT3, Cray XT4, Cray XT5, Cray XT5h, Cray XT5m, Cray XT6, Cray XT6m, CrayDoc, CrayPort, CRInform, Gemini, Libsci and UNICOS/lc are trademarks of Cray Inc. -
INFORMATION to USERS the Most Advanced Technology Has Been
INFORMATION TO USERS The most advanced technology has been used to photo graph and reproduce this manuscript from the microfilm master. UMI films the original text directly from the copy submitted. Thus, some dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from a computer printer. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyrighted material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are re produced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each oversize page is available as one exposure on a standard 35 mm slide or as a 17" x 23" black and white photographic print for an additional charge. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. 35 mm slides or 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. Accessing the World's Information since 1938 300 North Zeeb Road. Ann Arbor. Ml 48106-1346 USA Order Number 8812232 A standard-cell placement tool for the translation of behavioral descriptions into efficient layouts Buchenrieder, Klaus Juergen, Ph.D. The Ohio State University, 1988 Copyright ©1088 by Buchenrieder, Klaus Jflergen. All rights reserved. UMI 300 N. Zeeb Rd. Ann Arbor, MI 48106 PLEASE NOTE: In all cases this material has been filmed In the best possible way from the available copy. -
Computer Aided Logic Design)
Robert Betz: 97 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering INTRODUCTION TO CALD (Computer Aided Logic Design) Introduction • Late 1960’s-early 80’s – most logic design carried out using the TTL (transistor transistor logic) or the CMOS (complementary metal oxide transistor) logic families. This design philosophy is now know as dis- crete logic design (although at the time of use it would not have been). • 1980’s – growth of the PLA (Programmable Logic Array) and PAL (Programmable Array Logic) chip technology. Allowed a number of product terms to be once only programmed into a single integrated circuit. Only implemented combinational circuits. See Figure 1 and Figure 2. • The next generation of the PLA/PAL technology allowed the circuits to be programmed in the field and then erased and reprogrammed a number of times. Usually based on EPROM type technology for eras- ure. Flip flops also started to appear in on the outputs of some devices allowing sequential circuits to be built. See Figure 3 and Figure 4. • Late 1980’s – more sophisticated devices started to appear. These were often known as EPLDs (Electrically Programmable Logic Devices) based on macrocell architectures, or FPGAs (Field Program- mable Gate Arrays) based on interconnected gates, or low level struc- tures. These devices contained many more flip flops and more combinational logic capability compared to the earlier PLA/PAL type of circuitry. • 1990’s – Devices now allow almost arbitrary logic to be implemented. Very large devices, equivalent to 150,000 logic gates now available and the size of the devices is increasing. Slide 1 Robert Betz: 97 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering PLA logic • Used for combinational circuits Function implemented below: F1=AB'+AC F2=AC+BC . -
Chippewa Operating System
Chippewa Operating System The Chippewa Operating System often called COS was the operating system for the CDC 6600 supercomputer, generally considered the first super computer in the world. The Chippewa was initially developed as an experimental system, but was then also deployed on other CDC 6000 machines. The Chippewa Operating System often called COS is the discontinued operating system for the CDC 6600 supercomputer, generally considered the first super computer in the world. The Chippewa was initially developed as an experimental system, but was then also deployed on other CDC 6000 machines. The Chippewa was a rather simple job control oriented system derived from the earlier CDC 3000 which later influenced Kronos and SCOPE. The name of the system was based on the Chippewa Falls research and The Chippewa Operating System often called COS was the operating system for the CDC 6600 supercomputer, generally considered the first super computer in the world.[1] The Chippewa was initially developed as an experimental system, but was then also deployed on other CDC 6000 machines.[2]. Bibliography. Peterson, J. B. (1969). CDC 6600 control cards, Chippewa Operating System. U.S. Dept. of the Interior. Categories: Operating systems. Supercomputing. Wikimedia Foundation. 2010. The Chippewa Operating System often called COS was the operating system for the CDC 6600 supercomputer, generally considered the first super computer in the world.[1] The Chippewa was initially developed as an experimental system, but was then also deployed on other CDC 6000 machines.[2]. This operating system at Control Data Corporation was distinct from and preceded the Cray Operating System (also called COS) at Cray. -
Some Performance Comparisons for a Fluid Dynamics Code
NBSIR 87-3638 Some Performance Comparisons for a Fluid Dynamics Code Daniel W. Lozier Ronald G. Rehm U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Bureau of Standards National Engineering Laboratory Center for Applied Mathematics Gaithersburg, MD 20899 September 1987 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS NBSIR 87-3638 SOME PERFORMANCE COMPARISONS FOR A FLUID DYNAMICS CODE Daniel W. Lozier Ronald G. Rehm U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Bureau of Standards National Engineering Laboratory Center for Applied Mathematics Gaithersburg, MD 20899 September 1987 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, Clarence J. Brown, Acting Secretary NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS, Ernest Ambler, Director - 2 - 2. BENCHMARK PROBLEM In this section we describe briefly the source of the benchmark problem, the major logical structure of the Fortran program, and the parameters of three different specific instances of the benchmark problem that vary widely in the amount of time and memory required for execution. Research Background As stated in the introduction, our purpose in benchmarking computers is solely in the interest of further- ing our investigations into fundamental problems of fire science. Over a decade ago, stimulated by federal recognition of very large losses of fife and property by fires each year throughout the nation, NBS became actively involved in a national effort to reduce such losses. The work at NBS ranges from very practical to quite theoretical; our approach, which proceeds directly from basic principles, is at the theoretical end of this spectrum. Early work was concentrated on developing a mathematical model of convection arising from a prescribed source of heat in an enclosure, e.g. -
Technical I.Iterature and Information Guide
BR101/D REV 19 In Europe Order by BR464/D Technical I.iterature and Information Guide Effective Date 3rd Quarter 1994 ® MOTOROLA Semiconductor Products Sector Introduction To complement the industry's broadest line of semiconductor products, Motorola offers a complete library of Data Books which detail the electrical characteristics of its products. These documents are supplemented by User's Manuals and Application Notes describing the capabilities of the products in circuit and system design. Motorola attempts to fill the need for applications information concerning today's highly cqmplex electronic components. Each year dozens of authors from colleges and universities, and from the industry, add their individual contributions to the collective literature. From these, Motorola has selected a number of texts which add substantially to the comprehension and applications of some of the more complex products. By buying these in large quantities and providing them to customers at lower than retail cost, Motorola hopes to foster a more comprehensive acquaintance with these products at greatly reduced prices. All literature items can be obtained by mail from the Literature Distribution Center. Contents Data Books .......................................................................... 1 Selector Guides and Application Literature .............................................. 7 User's Manuals ..................................................................... 13 Textbooks ......................................................................... -
View Article(3467)
Problems of information technology, 2018, №1, 92–97 Kamran E. Jafarzade DOI: 10.25045/jpit.v09.i1.10 Institute of Information Technology of ANAS, Baku, Azerbaijan [email protected] COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE SOFTWARE USED IN SUPERCOMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES The article considers the classification of the types of supercomputer architectures, such as MPP, SMP and cluster, including software and application programming interfaces: MPI and PVM. It also offers a comparative analysis of software in the study of the dynamics of the distribution of operating systems (OS) for the last year of use in supercomputer technologies. In addition, the effectiveness of the use of CentOS software on the scientific network "AzScienceNet" is analyzed. Keywords: supercomputer, operating system, software, cluster, SMP-architecture, MPP-architecture, MPI, PVM, CentOS. Introduction Supercomputer is a computer with high computing performance compared to a regular computer. Supercomputers are often used for scientific and engineering applications that need to process very large databases or perform a large number of calculations. The performance of a supercomputer is measured in floating-point operations per second (FLOPS) instead of millions of instructions per second (MIPS). Since 2015, the supercomputers performing up to quadrillion FLOPS have started to be developed. Modern supercomputers represent a large number of high performance server computers, which are interconnected via a local high-speed backbone to achieve the highest performance [1]. Supercomputers were originally introduced in the 1960s and bearing the name or monogram of the companies such as Seymour Cray of Control Data Corporation (CDC), Cray Research over the next decades. By the end of the 20th century, massively parallel supercomputers with tens of thousands of available processors started to be manufactured. -
An Evaluation of Software Defined Radio – Main Document
UNCLASSIFIED This document has been produced by QinetiQ, Defence and Technology Systems for Ofcom under contract number 410000262 and provides an evaluation of software defined radio. An Evaluation of Software Defined Radio – Main Document Editor: Dr. Taj A. Sturman QinetiQ/D&TS/COM/PUB0603670/Version 1.0 15th Mar 2006 Requests for wider use or release must be sought from: QinetiQ Ltd Cody Technology Park Farnborough Hampshire GU14 0LX Copyright © QinetiQ Ltd 2006 UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED Administration page Customer Information Customer reference number N/A Project title An Evaluation of Software Defined Radio – Main Document Customer Organisation The Office of Communications (Ofcom) Customer contact Ahmad Atefi Contract number 410000262 Milestone number Of/Qi/002 Date due March 2006 Editor Taj A. Sturman MAL (801) 5378 PB315, QinetiQ, St. Andrews Rd, WR14 3PS [email protected] Principal authors Alister Burr University of York Julie Fitzpatrick QinetiQ Tim James Multiple Access Communications Ltd. Markus Rupp Technical University of Vienna Stephan Weiss University of Southampton Release Authority Name Ian Cox Post Business Group Manager Date of issue March 2006 Record of changes Issue Date Detail of Changes Version 0.1 05th Aug 2005 Creation of initial document including structure. Version 0.2 25th Aug 2005 First draft for review. Version 0.3 5th Mar 2006 Incorporation of reviewed comments. Version 1.0 15th Mar 2006 First Issue. QinetiQ/D&TS/COM/PUB0603670/Version 1.0 Page 2 UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED Executive Summary This document provides an evaluation of software defined radio (SDR). In an SDR, some or all of the signal path and baseband processing is implemented by software, normally in the digital domain, that is, the term SDR refers to how the lower layer functionality is implemented.