Managing the Social Impacts of Wind Power

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Managing the Social Impacts of Wind Power A WORLD BANK STUDY Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Greening the Wind ENVIRONMENTAL AND Public Disclosure Authorized SOCIAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR WIND POWER DEVELOPMENT George C. Ledec Public Disclosure Authorized Kennan W. Rapp Roberto G. Aiello WORLD BANK STUDY Greening the Wind Environmental and Social Considerations for Wind Power Development George C. Ledec Kennan W. Rapp Roberto G. Aiello Copyright © 2011 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank 1818 H Street, NW Washington, DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org 1 2 3 4 14 13 12 11 Energy Sector Management Assistance Program (ESMAP) reports are published to communicate the re- sults of ESMAP’s work to the development community with the least possible delay. Some sources cited in this paper may be informal documents that are not readily available. The fi ndings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this report are entirely those of the author(s) and should not be a ributed in any manner to the World Bank, or its affi liated organizations, or to members of its board of executive directors for the countries they represent, or to ESMAP. The World Bank and ESMAP do not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility whatsoever for any consequence of their use. The boundaries, colors, denominations, other information shown on any map in this volume do not imply on the part of the World Bank Group any judgment on the legal status of any territory or the endorsement of acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmi ing portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly. For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with complete information to the Copyright Clearance Center Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA; telephone: 978-750-8400; fax: 978-750-4470; Internet: www.copyright.com. All other queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to the Of- fi ce of the Publisher, The World Bank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA; fax: 202-522-2422; e-mail: [email protected]. ISBN: 978-0-8213-8926-3 eISBN: 978-0-8213-8929-4 DOI: 10.1596/978-0-8213-8926-3 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data has been requested. Contents Foreword .....................................................................................................................................v Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................ vii Acronyms and Abbreviations .............................................................................................viii Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................xi 1. Objectives and Scope of this Report .................................................................................1 2. Overview of Wind Power Development ..........................................................................3 3. Making Wind Power Safer for Biodiversity ................................................................... 13 Biodiversity Impacts of Wind Power ............................................................................. 13 Biodiversity-Friendly Practices for Wind Power Projects ........................................... 29 4. Addressing the Social Impacts of Wind Power ............................................................. 57 Typical Social Impacts in Wind Power Development ................................................. 57 Managing the Social Impacts of Wind Power ............................................................... 74 5. Final Considerations ........................................................................................................... 93 6. Appendixes .......................................................................................................................... 101 Appendix A. Case Study: Mexico La Venta II Wind Power Project ......................... 103 Appendix B. Case Study: Colombia Jepirachi Wind Power Project......................... 107 Appendix C. Case Study: Uruguay Wind Farm Project ............................................ 113 Appendix D. Correction Factors for Real versus Observed Bird and Bat Mortality ...................................................................................................................1 19 References ................................................................................................................................ 123 Color Photo Insert .................................................................................................................. 143 Boxes Box 3.1: Reasons to be Concerned about Biodiversity .........................................................14 Box 3.2: Raptor Mortality at Altamont Pass, California ......................................................18 Box 3.3: White-tailed Eagle Population Collapse at Smola, Norway ................................20 Box 3.4: Hypotheses for Bat A raction to Wind Turbines ..................................................23 Box 3.5: Alternative Turbine Designs .....................................................................................35 Box 4.1: An Example of Land-Related Confl icts in Energy Development in China........71 Box 4.2: Steps to Eff ective Stakeholder Participation ..........................................................79 Box 4.3: Wind Power Cooperatives in Denmark: An Applicable Model for Developing Countries? .....................................................................................................89 Box 4.4: Creating Incentives for Community Wind Development in Minnesota, USA .................................................................................................................90 iii iv Contents Figures Figure 2.1: Global Wind Power Installed Capacity ...............................................................4 Figure 2.2: Installed Wind Capacity (MW) in Top 10 Countries, 2009-2010 ......................4 Figure 2.3: Top 5 Countries in Off shore Wind (MW) ............................................................7 Figure 2.4: Typical Structural Components of a Wind Turbine ........................................10 Figure 2.5: Typical Elements of an Onshore Wind Farm ...................................................11 Figure 4.1: Wind Turbine Placement with Regard to Sound Impacts ............................144 Tables Table 2.1: No Free Lunch—Environmental and Social Impacts of Power Generation Technologies ....................................................................................................8 Table 2.2: Wind Power Projects Financed by the World Bank Group ................................9 Table 3.1: Eff ects of Increased Turbine Cut-in Speed on Bat Mortality and Power Generation .........................................................................................................................49 Table 4.1: Employment Generated by Development Projects in Three Sectors in Latin American Countries and the United States ........................................................63 Table 4.2: Comparison of Diff erent Revenue-sharing Arrangements ..............................84 Table 5.1: Environmental and Social Impacts of Wind Power Projects and Corresponding Mitigation or Enhancement Options ..................................................95 Foreword ccording to the International Energy Agency, electricity demand is projected to Agrow by around 30 percent by 2020. With growing a ention to climate consider- ations and cost concerns regarding thermal generation as petroleum prices rise, alter- native generation technologies will become increasingly important in tackling energy security issues. Renewable energy, and wind energy in particular, will be key in helping to meet this growing demand in a sustainable way. As wind power is one of the most promising renewable resources in existence to- day, it off ers several potential benefi ts. In the past decade, the use of wind power has expanded dramatically around the world, boosted by favorable economics, increasing interest in low-carbon technologies, and supportive governmental policies driven by the numerous benefi ts wind can provide. Since wind power does not rely on imported fuels, it helps countries to be er use local resources while diversifying generation sources. Furthermore, by relying less on petroleum-based fuels with potentially high and volatile prices, wind power can help reduce the risk profi le of the sector. In addition, if wind energy displaces fossil fuel–generated electricity, it can reduce carbon emissions in a cost-eff ective manner. Reducing carbon emissions has both environmental and econom- ic value; the la er will become more evident as future uses of carbon-intensive fuels are further constrained. Wind power also has the potential to reduce air pollution at the local level by replacing more polluting sources of power generation, thereby improv- ing environmental and human health. Finally, wind power stands out among all major power generation technologies (renewable
Recommended publications
  • P501 Numerical Simulation of Wind Power Potential in Upstate New York
    P501 NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF WIND POWER POTENTIAL IN UPSTATE NEW YORK Robert Ballentine *, Scott Steiger and Daniel Phoenix State University of New York at Oswego 1. INTRODUCTION 2. METHODOLOGY Consistent with the national goal of moving away 2.1 Grid Arrangement from our dependence on carbon-based fuels, there is considerable interest in New York State in developing We are running the ARW-core of WRF on a wind power especially in areas with highest potential. doubly-nested grid (Fig. 1) to ensure that both large- The purpose of this research is to simulate low-level scale meteorological forcing and local geographical winds over upstate New York by running the Weather effects are well-represented. The grid spacings of the Research and Forecasting (WRF, Skamarock, et al large, intermediate and fine grids are 12 km, 4 km and 2005) model every day on a high-resolution (1.333 1.333 km respectively. We use 33 sigma levels where km) domain. Using the standard wind speed-versus- the lowest levels correspond to 10m, 40m and 80m power generation curve for a GE 1.5 MW wind above ground under typical meteorological conditions. turbine, we can estimate the monthly and seasonal We employ the Noah LSM and Yonsei PBL schemes. average wind power potential at all of our grid points (covering much of upstate New York and adjacent Lake Ontario). To determine the accuracy of WRF wind predictions, we are comparing winds simulated by WRF at 10 m AGL with hourly observations at three regularly reporting sites near Lake Ontario. 1.1 Brief Description of Wind Power Sites As of November 2009, New York State had more than 1200 MW of wind generating capacity from sites such as Horizon Wind Energy's Maple Ridge Wind Farm in Lewis County and farms operated by Noble Environmental Power in Clinton, Franklin and Wyoming Counties.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Powering America FY07 Activities Summary
    Wind Powering America FY07 Activities Summary Dear Wind Powering America Colleague, We are pleased to present the Wind Powering America FY07 Activities Summary, which reflects the accomplishments of our state Wind Working Groups, our programs at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, and our partner organizations. The national WPA team remains a leading force for moving wind energy forward in the United States. At the beginning of 2007, there were more than 11,500 megawatts (MW) of wind power installed across the United States, with an additional 4,000 MW projected in both 2007 and 2008. The American Wind Energy Association (AWEA) estimates that the U.S. installed capacity will exceed 16,000 MW by the end of 2007. When our partnership was launched in 2000, there were 2,500 MW of installed wind capacity in the United States. At that time, only four states had more than 100 MW of installed wind capacity. Seventeen states now have more than 100 MW installed. We anticipate five to six additional states will join the 100-MW club early in 2008, and by the end of the decade, more than 30 states will have passed the 100-MW milestone. WPA celebrates the 100-MW milestones because the first 100 megawatts are always the most difficult and lead to significant experience, recognition of the wind energy’s benefits, and expansion of the vision of a more economically and environmentally secure and sustainable future. WPA continues to work with its national, regional, and state partners to communicate the opportunities and benefits of wind energy to a diverse set of stakeholders.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Power Suitability in Worcester, M Assachusetts
    Project Number: IQP JRK-WND1 Wind Power Suitability in Worcester, M assachusetts An Interactive Qualifying Project Report: submitted to the Faculty of WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science by ______________________________ Christopher Kalisz chkalisz@ wpi.edu ______________________________ Calixte M onast cmonast@ wpi.edu ______________________________ M ichael Santoro santron@ wpi.edu ______________________________ Benjamin Trow btrow@ wpi.edu Date: March 14, 2005 Faculty Advisors: _________________________ Professor Scott Jiusto _________________________ Professor Robert Krueger ABSTRACT The goal of this project was to identify criteria needed to determine the suitability of potential wind turbine sites in Worcester, Massachusetts. The report first discusses physical, environmental, economic, and social factors that affect the suitability of potential wind power sites. We then completed a case study for a site in downtown Worcester, directly applying the criteria. Our hope is the project will raise local awareness of renewable energy and illustrate the practicality of a clean energy project. - 1 - TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT............................................................................................................................... 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS............................................................................................................ 2 TABLE OF FIGURES...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation of Innovative Rotor Concepts for the Big Adaptive Rotor
    Investigation of Innovative Rotor Concepts for the Big Adaptive Rotor Project Nick Johnson,1 Pietro Bortolotti,1 Katherine Dykes,1 Garrett Barter,1 Patrick Moriarty,1 Scott Carron,1 Fabian Wendt,1 Paul Veers,1 Josh Paquette,2 Chris Kelly,2 2 and Brandon Ennis 1 National Renewable Energy Laboratory 2 Sandia National Laboratories NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Technical Report Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy NREL/TP-5000-73605 Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC September 2019 This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 Investigation of Innovative Rotor Concepts for the Big Adaptive Rotor Project Nick Johnson,1 Pietro Bortolotti,1 Katherine Dykes,1 Garrett Barter,1 Patrick Moriarty,1 Scott Carron,1 1 1 2 2 Fabian Wendt, Paul Veers, Josh Paquette, Chris Kelly, 2 and Brandon Ennis 1 National Renewable Energy Laboratory 2 Sandia National Laboratories Suggested Citation Johnson, Nick, Pietro Bortolotti, Katherine Dykes, Garrett Barter, Patrick Moriarty, Scott Carron, Fabian Wendt, Paul Veers, Josh Paquette, Chris Kelly, and Brandon Ennis. 2019. Investigation of Innovative Rotor Concepts for the Big Adaptive Rotor Project. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory. NREL/TP-5000-73605. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy19osti/73605.pdf. NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Technical Report Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy NREL/TP-5000-73605 Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC September 2019 This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy National Renewable Energy Laboratory Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning for Wind Energy
    Planning for Wind Energy Suzanne Rynne, AICP , Larry Flowers, Eric Lantz, and Erica Heller, AICP , Editors American Planning Association Planning Advisory Service Report Number 566 Planning for Wind Energy is the result of a collaborative part- search intern at APA; Kirstin Kuenzi is a research intern at nership among the American Planning Association (APA), APA; Joe MacDonald, aicp, was program development se- the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), the nior associate at APA; Ann F. Dillemuth, aicp, is a research American Wind Energy Association (AWEA), and Clarion associate and co-editor of PAS Memo at APA. Associates. Funding was provided by the U.S. Department The authors thank the many other individuals who con- of Energy under award number DE-EE0000717, as part of tributed to or supported this project, particularly the plan- the 20% Wind by 2030: Overcoming the Challenges funding ners, elected officials, and other stakeholders from case- opportunity. study communities who participated in interviews, shared The report was developed under the auspices of the Green documents and images, and reviewed drafts of the case Communities Research Center, one of APA’s National studies. Special thanks also goes to the project partners Centers for Planning. The Center engages in research, policy, who reviewed the entire report and provided thoughtful outreach, and education that advance green communities edits and comments, as well as the scoping symposium through planning. For more information, visit www.plan- participants who worked with APA and project partners to ning.org/nationalcenters/green/index.htm. APA’s National develop the outline for the report: James Andrews, utilities Centers for Planning conduct policy-relevant research and specialist at the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission; education involving community health, natural and man- Jennifer Banks, offshore wind and siting specialist at AWEA; made hazards, and green communities.
    [Show full text]
  • ENERCON Wind Energy Converters Technology & Service
    ENERCON wind energy converters Technology & Service PAGE 2 ENERCON U¾QOHUH*HQHO%DNóġTechnology & Service Yeniliklerle gelen avantaj PAGE 3 1 ENERCON turbine technology 6 Rotor blades 8 Direct drive 9 Annular generator technology 10 Tower construction 12 Precast concrete towers 13 Steel towers 14 Foundation construction 15 2 ENERCON WEC control system 16 Sensor system 18 ENERCON ice detection system 18 Rotor blade de-icing system 19 ENERCON storm control 19 3 ENERCON grid integration and wind farm management 20 Optimum grid integration 22 P/Q diagram/voltage stability 24 Power-frequency control 25 Inertia Emulation 26 Fault ride-through - option 27 Generation management system – power regulation for maximum yield 28 Bottleneck management – maximum output during bottlenecks 28 ENERCON SCADA RTU 29 ENERCON FCU 29 4 ENERCON remote monitoring 30 ENERCON SCADA system 32 ENERCON Service Info Portal 35 ENERCON PartnerKonzept 36 5 6 ENERCON product overview 40 PAGE 4 Technology & Service PAGE 5 Introduction ENERCON has been among the top producers is performed with 3D CAD systems which assist of wind energy converters for nearly 30 years the developers in verifying overstress and criti- now. Two of the key contributing factors to the FDODUHDVE\PHDQVRIWKHʖQLWHHOHPHQWPHWKRG company´s success are innovation and quality. Production processes are not launched until com- Both highly developed vertical integration and a prehensive quality tests have been completed – a comprehensive quality management system play strategy which has been successfully adopted by D VLJQLʖFDQW UROH LQ VHFXULQJ (1(5&21vV KLJK (1(5&21vV H[FOXVLYH SURGXFWLRQ SODQWV VLQFH quality standards. 2009. The company is therefore distinguished by outstanding quality and a high degree of vertical Through constant product enhancement and integration.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the State of New York Board on Electric
    15-F-0122 Sokolow Post Hearing Brief BEFORE THE STATE OF NEW YORK BOARD ON ELECTRIC GENERATION SITING AND THE ENVIRONMENT In the Matter of Baron Wind LLC Case 15-F-0122 INITIAL POST-HEARING BRIEF Alice Sokolow Case #15-F-0122 also for Parties: Thomas Flansburg Mary Ann McManus Bert Candee Virginia Gullam Dated: 4/15/2019 1 15-F-0122 Sokolow Post Hearing Brief TABLE OF CONTENTS I Introduction 2 II Facility 2 III Legal Background 2-3 IV. Issues- Fremont Wind Law 3 V. Nature of Env Impact-Avian & Bat 5 VI. Nature of Env Impact –Safety Exh1001.6 11 Exh 1001.15 29 VII Nature of Env Viewshed & Flicker 54 VIII Not Addressed 70 IX Conclusions 70 I Introduction We are five individual parties with grave concerns over conditions and completeness of Baron Winds Applications for a Certificate of Environmental Compatibility and Public Need Pursuant to Article 10 to Construct a Wind Energy Facility. II. Facility Description Baron Winds LLC (the Applicant) is proposing to construct the Baron Winds Project, a wind energy generation facility and associated infrastructure (the Facility) in the Towns of Cohocton, Dansville, Fremont, and Wayland in Steuben County, New York (See Figure 1).The Facility will consist of up to 69 utility scale wind turbines with a total generating capacity of up to 242 Megawatts (MW). Other proposed components will include: access roads, buried collection lines, up to four permanent meteorological (met) towers, one operations and maintenance (O&M) building, up to two temporary construction staging/laydown areas, and a collection/point of interconnection.
    [Show full text]
  • Interim Financial Report, Second Quarter 2021
    Company announcement No. 16/2021 Interim Financial Report Second Quarter 2021 Vestas Wind Systems A/S Hedeager 42,8200 Aarhus N, Denmark Company Reg. No.: 10403782 Wind. It means the world to us.TM Contents Summary ........................................................................................................................................ 3 Financial and operational key figures ......................................................................................... 4 Sustainability key figures ............................................................................................................. 5 Group financial performance ....................................................................................................... 6 Power Solutions ............................................................................................................................ 9 Service ......................................................................................................................................... 12 Sustainability ............................................................................................................................... 13 Strategy and financial and capital structure targets ................................................................ 14 Outlook 2021 ................................................................................................................................ 17 Consolidated financial statements 1 January - 30 June .........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Powering America Fy08 Activities Summary
    WIND POWERING AMERICA FY08 ACTIVITIES SUMMARY Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Dear Wind Powering America Colleague, We are pleased to present the Wind Powering America FY08 Activities Summary, which reflects the accomplishments of our state Wind Working Groups, our programs at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, and our partner organizations. The national WPA team remains a leading force for moving wind energy forward in the United States. At the beginning of 2008, there were more than 16,500 megawatts (MW) of wind power installed across the United States, with an additional 7,000 MW projected by year end, bringing the U.S. installed capacity to more than 23,000 MW by the end of 2008. When our partnership was launched in 2000, there were 2,500 MW of installed wind capacity in the United States. At that time, only four states had more than 100 MW of installed wind capacity. Twenty-two states now have more than 100 MW installed, compared to 17 at the end of 2007. We anticipate that four or five additional states will join the 100-MW club in 2009, and by the end of the decade, more than 30 states will have passed the 100-MW milestone. WPA celebrates the 100-MW milestones because the first 100 megawatts are always the most difficult and lead to significant experience, recognition of the wind energy’s benefits, and expansion of the vision of a more economically and environmentally secure and sustainable future. Of course, the 20% Wind Energy by 2030 report (developed by AWEA, the U.S. Department of Energy, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, and other stakeholders) indicates that 44 states may be in the 100-MW club by 2030, and 33 states will have more than 1,000 MW installed (at the end of 2008, there were six states in that category).
    [Show full text]
  • ENERCON Magazine for Wind Energy 01/14
    WINDBLATT ENERCON Magazine for wind energy 01/14 ENERCON installs E-115 prototype New two part blade concept passes practial test during installation at Lengerich site (Lower Saxony). ENERCON launches new blade test station Ultra modern testing facilities enables static and dynamic tests on rotor blades of up to 70m. ENERCON announces new WECs for strong wind sites E-82/2,3 MW and E-101/3 MW series also to be available for Wind Class I sites. 4 ENERCON News 21 ENERCON Fairs 23 ENERCON Adresses 12 18 Imprint Publisher: 14 New ENERCON wind energy converters ENERCON GmbH ENERCON announces E-82 and E-101 for strong wind sites. Dreekamp 5 D-26605 Aurich Tel. +49 (0) 49 41 927 0 Fax +49 (0) 49 41 927 109 www.enercon.de Politics Editorial office: Felix Rehwald 15 Interview with Matthias Groote, Member of the European Parliament Printed by: Chairmann of Committee on the Environment comments on EU energy policy. Beisner Druck GmbH & Co. KG, 8 Buchholz/Nordheide Copyright: 16 ENERCON Comment on EEG Reform All photos, illustrations, texts, images, WINDBLATT 01/14 graphic representations, insofar as this The Government's plans are excessive inflict a major blow on the onshore industry. is not expressly stated to the contrary, are the property of ENERCON GmbH and may not be reproduced, changed, transmitted or used otherwise without the prior written consent of Practice ENERCON GmbH. Cover Frequency: The WINDBLATT is published four 18 Replacing old machines times a year and is regularly enclosed 8 Installation of E-115 prototype to the «neue energie», magazine for Clean-up along coast: Near Neuharlingersiel ENERCON replaces 17 old turbines with 4 modern E-126.
    [Show full text]
  • 2Nd EPR Romania 2010 V2
    ECE/CEP/166 UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE REVIEWS ROMANIA Second Review UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, 2012 Environmental Performance Reviews Series No. 37 NOTE Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. In particular, the boundaries shown on the maps do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. The United Nations issued the first Environmental Performance Review of Romania (Environmental Performance Reviews Series No. 13) in 2001. This volume is issued in English only. ECE/CEP/166 UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales E.12.II.E.11 ISBN 978-92-1-117065-8 e-ISBN 978-92-1-055895-2 ISSN 1020-4563 iii Foreword In 1993, Environmental Performance Reviews (EPRs) of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (ECE) were initiated at the second Environment for Europe Ministerial Conference in Lucerne, Switzerland. They were intended to cover the ECE States that are not members of the Organisation for Economic Co- operation and Development. At the fifth Environment for Europe Ministerial Conference (Kiev, 2003), the Ministers affirmed their support for the EPR Programme, and decided that the Programme should continue with a second cycle of reviews.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Wind Energy in New York State
    Wind Energy Toolkit – Overview 2. Wind Energy in New York State 2.1. Market Drivers and Barriers Drivers for Wind Development in New York State Windy rural areas in the Northeast, such as those in Upstate and Western New York, have proved to be attractive to wind energy developers. Market drivers for wind development generally include an area’s proximity to major load centers, available electrical transmission capacity, and a good wind resource; regionally, drivers include the high costs of electrical energy in the Northeast, concerns over regional air quality, federal tax incentives, and legislative mandates in New York and neighboring states. Some specific factors that are driving the market for wind energy in New York include the following: • A good resource: New York State is ranked 15th in annual wind energy generating potential (7080 MW or approximately 62 billion kWh)—more than California or any state east of the Mississippi and the largest potential of any state in the Northeast.1 The location and relative strength of wind resources in New York State are shown in Figure 1. • State mandates: Renewable energy purchase mandates or renewable portfolio standards (RPS) in New York and neighboring states are driving the demand for new renewable resources in the region, particularly wind energy. Originally, the New York State RPS called for an increase in renewable energy used in the state from its then-current level of about 19% to 25% by the year 2013. In 2009, the RPS goal was expanded to 30% renewable energy by 2015. Wind energy is expected to supply a significant portion of the RPS requirement, which effectively creates a stable, long-term market for the retail sale of wind energy in New York.
    [Show full text]