DOCSLIB.ORG

Ebook Download Ivan the Terrible the Film Companion 1St Edition

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ebook Download Ivan the Terrible the Film Companion 1St Edition IVAN THE TERRIBLE THE FILM COMPANION 1ST EDITION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Joan Neuberger | 9781860645600 | | | | | Ivan the Terrible The Film Companion 1st edition PDF Book The regency then alternated between several feuding boyar families that fought for control. The numbers in Prokofiev's manuscript scores are listed in the table below. Of course, polygamy was also prohibited by the Church, but Ivan planned to "put his wife away". The latter receives Ivan's permission to retire to a monastery, while Kurbsky attempts to resume his romance with the Tsarina, who repels his advances. Piano Sonata No. The world premiere performance took place on 20 February at the Bolshoy Theatre. The following commentary, by one T. The entire production was shot in Kazakhstan at Mosfilm's substantial production facility in Alma Ata. This book offers an insight into Eisenstein's grand project. Evfrosinia comes into the palace with a cup of wine hidden in her robes, in which she has put poison. The ongoing Livonian War made Moscow's garrison to number only 6, and could not even delay the Tatar approach. According to his own letters, Ivan, along with his younger brother Yuri , often felt neglected and offended by the mighty boyars from the Shuisky and Belsky families. Welcome back. Originally it numbered Later Ivan is enthroned as Grand Prince of Moscow. You can help by adding to it. The color sequences of Part Two were also filmed by Moskvin. Foreign Languages Pub. The First Pskov Chronicle estimates the number of victims at 60, Certain characters wear colours to refer to their personalities, such Evfrosinia wearing black to visually allude to her evil nature. Ivan completely altered Russia's governmental structure, establishing the character of modern Russian political organisation. His friend, Kolychev, arrives, now the monk Philip ; after a heated debate, Philip agrees to become metropolitan of Moscow, as long as Ivan gives him the right to intercede for condemned men. A third film, which began production in , was halted when the decision was made not to release the second film. More filters. The default sequence can be restored by refreshing the browser press F5. Casualty figures vary greatly from different sources. Although more than one architect was associated with that name, it is believed that the principal architect is the same person. Archived from the original on 20 March During his youth was a conquest of the Khanate of Kazan and the Khanate of Astrakhan. In , Chancellor sailed to the White Sea and continued overland to Moscow, where he visited Ivan's court. Want to Read saving…. He has the Oprichniki bring throne, orb , sceptre , crown and royal robes, and they all bow down to "Tsar Vladimir". Note : The column marked 'S' shows the numbering of the musical numbers by Musikverlage Hans Sikorski, the publisher of the restored manuscript film score zeros have been inserted before single digit numbers for sorting purposes. Contact me by fax. Steinberg In the composer Mikhail Chulaki and choreographer Yuri Grigorovich drew on Prokofiev's film scores to create the ballet Ivan the Terrible , which was given its premiere in Nellie K. Views Read Edit View history. Philharmonia Orchestra , Ambrosian Chorus. The first evidence of cooperation surfaces in when Ivan ordered the Don Cossacks to attack Crimea. Read more Ryan marked it as to-read Aug 03, Showing Ivan calms the crowd, but is interrupted by envoys from the khanate of Kazan , who send him a ceremonial knife with the suggestion that he do himself a favor by using it to commit suicide. Early in , Ivan's ambassadors concluded a treaty at Constantinople that restored friendly relations between the Sultan and the Tsar. Available in many editions as well as online, for example at slovardalja. In , the combined forces of Khan Mehmed Giray and his Crimean allies attacked Russia, captured more than , slaves. When the throne was returned to Ivan in , he returned some of the confiscated land and kept the rest. Russia remained isolated from sea trade. Ivan the Terrible The Film Companion 1st edition Writer Brad rated it it was amazing Aug 22, This book has a dual focus: how Eisenstein achieves his effect Recently viewed the two films or two-thirds of one dismembered film? Hesitantly, Vladimir does. Ivan agreed to reinforce the Cossacks with his streltsy, but the detachment sent to Siberia died of starvation without any benefit. Part II, however, was banned in when it became "one of four films denounced by the Party Central Committee. He introduced local self-government to rural regions, mainly in northeastern Russia, populated by the state peasantry. Octavo, original brown paper boards. Unresisted, Devlet devastated unprotected towns and villages around Moscow and caused the Fire of Moscow In Chisholm, Hugh ed. Stasevich approached the music for the film in a creative manner turning it into an oratorio consisting of 20 numbers. Orthodox World. Main article: Massacre of Novgorod. Ivan was the first ruler to begin cooperating with the free cossacks on a large scale. The concert premiere of the soundtrack film score, as restored by Frank Strobel , took place on 16 September at the Musikfest Berlin, accompanied by a showing of the film in the Great Hall of the Konzerthaus Berlin. Under the supervision of Prince Alexander Gorbaty-Shuisky , the Russians used battering rams and a siege tower , undermining and cannons. Informally, there was a big political subtext. However, Yadegar failed to gather the full sum of tribute that he proposed to the tsar and so Ivan did nothing to save his inefficient vassal. Conditions under the Oprichnina were worsened by the epidemic, a plague that killed 10, people in Novgorod and to 1, daily in Moscow. China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly. At the banquet, Ivan gets Vladimir drunk while the Oprichniki sing and dance around them; a tipsy Vladimir mentions that there is a plot to kill Ivan, and that he, Vladimir, is to replace him as Tsar. Trivia About Ivan the Terrible. In the cathedral, the assassin runs up, stabs the mock Tsar and is immediately seized by Fyodor and Malyuta. The erection of the statue was vastly covered in international media like The Guardian , [80] The Washington Post , [81] Politico , [82] and others. The last siege of the Tatar capital commenced on 30 August. The Economist. Piano Piano Concerto No. Text in Russian. Within this limited scope, Tsivian achieves his aim. Ivan corresponded with overseas Orthodox leaders. About Yuri Tsivian. Beyond that, swans are displayed at two feasts within the film - the first are white, representing innocence and goodness; the second are black, representing the wickedness that has come to pass. Back to colour. In , the graves of Ivan and his sons were excavated and examined by Soviet scientists. Ivan makes a speech proclaiming his intent to unite and protect Russia against the foreign armies outside her borders and the enemies within — a reference to the boyars, who are already seen as discontented with his coronation. We ship worldwide and all packages will be sent via UPS or Federal Express unless another carrier is requested. June Learn how and when to remove this template message. The regency then alternated between several feuding boyar families that fought for control. Ivan opened up the White Sea and the port of Arkhangelsk to the company and granted it privilege of trading throughout his reign without paying the standard customs fees. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. The Russian troops did not have time to intercept it, but the regiment of Prince Khvorostinin vigorously attacked the Tatars from the rear. Archived from the original on 20 March Ivan the Terrible The Film Companion 1st edition Reviews A plan to unite the Volga and Don by a canal was detailed in Constantinople. The default sequence can be restored by refreshing the browser press F5. The Tsarina now falls ill, and while Ivan is receiving bad news from all fronts, the boyars plot to kill her. Download as PDF Printable version. See templates for discussion to help reach a consensus. Fyodor Basmanov Mikhail Kuznetsov — Alexei Basmanov's only son, Fyodor is, at the beginning, awed by the Tsar and his mystique; his personality changes dramatically en route to Part II. In the prologue Ivan's mother and her lover are murdered by the boyars. A third film, which began production in , was halted when the decision was made not to release the second film. That series of treasons made Ivan paranoically suspicious of nobility. Just as the royal couple receive word that Kurbsky has defected to the Livonians, Evfrosinia slips the cup of wine into the room and listens from behind a wall. Hesitantly, Vladimir does. The Journal of Military History. Welcome back. Petersburg, The first wave of persecutions targeted primarily the princely clans of Russia, notably the influential families of Suzdal. Many monks were tortured to death during the Massacre of Novgorod. However, Yadegar failed to gather the full sum of tribute that he proposed to the tsar and so Ivan did nothing to save his inefficient vassal. Foreign Languages Pub. Grand Prince of Moscow 3 December — 16 January More Details This section does not cite any sources. Ivan makes a speech proclaiming his intent to unite and protect Russia against the foreign armies outside her borders and the enemies within — a reference to the boyars, who are already seen as discontented with his coronation. Piano Concerto No. The numbers in Prokofiev's manuscript scores are listed in the table below. The subject of the "First Tale" Part 1 is the early years, to , of the reign of Ivan IV of Russia : his coronation, his intent to curb the powers of the boyars , his wedding, his conquest of Kazan , his almost fatal illness, the poisoning and death of his first wife Anastasiya , the formation of the Oprichniki , and his abdication.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Inextricable Link Between Literature and Music in 19Th
    COMPOSERS AS STORYTELLERS: THE INEXTRICABLE LINK BETWEEN LITERATURE AND MUSIC IN 19TH CENTURY RUSSIA A Thesis Presented to The Graduate Faculty of The University of Akron In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Music Ashley Shank December 2010 COMPOSERS AS STORYTELLERS: THE INEXTRICABLE LINK BETWEEN LITERATURE AND MUSIC IN 19TH CENTURY RUSSIA Ashley Shank Thesis Approved: Accepted: _______________________________ _______________________________ Advisor Interim Dean of the College Dr. Brooks Toliver Dr. Dudley Turner _______________________________ _______________________________ Faculty Reader Dean of the Graduate School Mr. George Pope Dr. George R. Newkome _______________________________ _______________________________ School Director Date Dr. William Guegold ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CHAPTER I. OVERVIEW OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF SECULAR ART MUSIC IN RUSSIA……..………………………………………………..……………….1 Introduction……………………..…………………………………………………1 The Introduction of Secular High Art………………………………………..……3 Nicholas I and the Rise of the Noble Dilettantes…………………..………….....10 The Rise of the Russian School and Musical Professionalism……..……………19 Nationalism…………………………..………………………………………..…23 Arts Policies and Censorship………………………..…………………………...25 II. MUSIC AND LITERATURE AS A CULTURAL DUET………………..…32 Cross-Pollination……………………………………………………………...…32 The Russian Soul in Literature and Music………………..……………………...38 Music in Poetry: Sound and Form…………………………..……………...……44 III. STORIES IN MUSIC…………………………………………………… ….51 iii Opera……………………………………………………………………………..57
    [Show full text]
  • Warfare, State and Society on the Black Sea Steppe, 1500-1700
    Warfare, State and Society on the Black Sea Steppe, 1500–1700 In the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries Muscovy waged a costly struggle against the Crimean Khanate, the Ottoman Empire, and the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth for control of the fertile steppe above the Black Sea. This was a region of great strategic and economic importance – arguably the pivot of Eurasia at the time. Yet, this crucial period in Russia’s history has, up until now, been neglected by historians. Brian L. Davies’s study provides an essential insight into the emergence of Russia as a great power. The long campaign took a great toll upon Russia’s population, economy, and institutions, and repeatedly frustrated or redefi ned Russian military and diplo- matic projects in the West. The struggle was every bit as important as Russia’s wars in northern and central Europe for driving the Russian state-building process, forcing military reform and shaping Russia’s visions of Empire. Warfare, State and Society on the Black Sea Steppe, 1500–1700 examines the course of this struggle and explains how Russia’s ultimate prevalence resulted from new strategies of military colonization in addition to improvements in army command-and-control, logistics, and tactics. Brian L. Davies is Associate Professor of History at the University of Texas at San Antonio. His publications include State Power and Community in Early Modern Russia: The Case of Kozlov, 1635–1649 (2004). Warfare and History General Editor Jeremy Black Professor of History, University of Exeter Air Power in the Age of Total War Modern Chinese Warfare, Warfare in Atlantic Africa, 1500– John Buckley 1795–1989 1800: Maritime Confl icts and the Bruce A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cossack Myth: History and Nationhood in the Age of Empires
    THE COSSACK MYTH In the years following the Napoleonic Wars, a mysterious manuscript began to circulate among the dissatisfied noble elite of the Russian Empire. Entitled The History of the Rus′, it became one of the most influential historical texts of the modern era. Attributed to an eighteenth-century Orthodox archbishop, it described the heroic struggles of the Ukrainian Cossacks. Alexander Pushkin read the book as a manifestation of Russian national spirit, but Taras Shevchenko interpreted it as a quest for Ukrainian national liberation, and it would inspire thousands of Ukrainians to fight for the freedom of their homeland. Serhii Plokhy tells the fascinating story of the text’s discovery and dissemination, unravelling the mystery of its authorship and tracing its subsequent impact on Russian and Ukrainian historical and literary imagination. In so doing, he brilliantly illuminates the relationship between history, myth, empire, and nationhood, from Napoleonic times to the fall of the Soviet Union. serhii plokhy is the Mykhailo Hrushevsky Professor of Ukrainian History at Harvard University. His previous publications include Ukraine and Russia: Representations of the Past (2008)andThe Origins of the Slavic Nations: Premodern Identities in Russia, Ukraine and Belarus (2006). Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 210.212.129.125 on Sun Dec 23 05:35:34 WET 2012. http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ebook.jsf?bid=CBO9781139135399 Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2012 new studies in european history Edited by PETER
    [Show full text]
  • The Atheist Director and the Orthodox Tsar Sergei Eisenstein's Ivan The
    Revue des études slaves LXXXVIII-3 | 2017 Varia The Atheist Director and the Orthodox Tsar Sergei Eisenstein’s Ivan the Terrible Le metteur en scène athée et le tsar orthodoxe : Ivan le Terrible de Sergej Èjzenštejn Charles J. Halperin Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/res/1272 DOI: 10.4000/res.1272 ISSN: 2117-718X Publisher Institut d'études slaves Printed version Date of publication: 30 December 2017 Number of pages: 515-526 ISSN: 0080-2557 Electronic reference Charles J. Halperin, « The Atheist Director and the Orthodox Tsar Sergei Eisenstein’s Ivan the Terrible », Revue des études slaves [Online], LXXXVIII-3 | 2017, Online since 31 December 2018, connection on 10 December 2020. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/res/1272 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/res. 1272 Revue des études slaves THE ATHEIST DIRECTOR AND THE ORTHODOX TSAR SERGEI EISENSTEIN’S IVAN THE TERRIBL E* Charles J. HALPERIN Bloomington – IN Director Sergei Eisenstein paid considerable attention to religion in his film Ivan the Terrible about Tsar Ivan the Terrible (Ivan IV, Ivan Vasil ′evich, Ivan Groznyi, ruled 1533-1584), which did not go unnoticed in the officially atheist Soviet Union. In 1942 a letter from D. I. Eremin in Moscow was hand- delivered to Eisenstein in Alma Ata , 1 expressing doubts about the prominence of Ivan’s “religious moods ( nastroeniia )” in the screenpla y 2. The Council of People’s Commissars Committee on Cinema Affairs criticized Part I for showing “too much religion.” The stenographic account of the Committee’s discussion does not record that anyone present raised the issue, so this criticism in the Committee’s report, written by its staff, originated either in the committee’s chairman, I.
    [Show full text]
  • Images of Flight and Aviation and Their Relation to Soviet Identity in Soviet Film 1926-1945
    ‘Air-mindedness’ and Air Parades: Images of Flight and Aviation and Their Relation to Soviet Identity in Soviet Film 1926-1945 Candyce Veal, UCL PhD Thesis 2 I, Candyce L. Veal, declare that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. 3 Abstract Taking Soviet films from 1926 to 1945 as its frame of reference, this thesis seeks to answer the question: is autonomous voicing possible in film during a period defined by Stalin’s concentration of power and his authoritarian influence on the arts? Aviation and flight imaging in these films shares characteristics of language, and the examination of the use of aviation and flight as an expressive means reveals nuances in messaging which go beyond the official demand of Soviet Socialist Realism to show life in its revolutionary movement towards socialism. Reviewing the films chronologically, it is shown how they are unified by a metaphor of ‘gaining wings’. In filmic representations of air-shows, Arctic flights, aviation schools, aviation circus-acts, and aircraft invention, the Soviet peoples’ identity in the 1930s became constructed as being metaphorically ‘winged’. This metaphor links to the fundamental Icarian precursor myth and, in turn, speaks to sub-structuring semantic spheres of freedom, transformation, creativity, love and transcendence. Air-parade film communicates symbolically, but refers to real events; like an icon, it visualizes the word of Stalinist- Leninist scriptures. Piloted by heroic ‘falcons’, Soviet destiny was perceived to be a miraculous ‘flight’ which realised the political and technological dreams of centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Ivan the Terrible and His Secret Police
    Ivan the Terrible and His Secret Police The Oprichnina (a secret-police organization which existed between 1565-1572) consisted of about 6,000 political police (called oprichniki) who were at the service of Tsar Ivan IV (also known as "Ivan Grozny," meaning "Ivan the Terrible"). The job of the secret police was to find individuals who were supposedly plotting against the Tsar, then confiscate their lands and put the plotters to death. As Ivan IV designed the system, it would function outside the boundaries of law. Persecutions took place without any legal limits and without restraint. Although he claimed to be deeply religious, the Tsar did not spare clerics—or the wealth contained in some Russian Orthodox churches—if religious men were rounded-up by the oprichniki. Russian nobles and aristocrats were the main targets of this system of domestic terror. As the oprichniki became more ruthless, more people died. The city of Novgorod was particularly hard hit. In this work of water-color-and-charcoal-on-paper, by Apollinary Vasnetsov (1856-1933), we see members of the Oprichnina coming into a town. The immediate result is that everyone flees as fast as they can. This scene was used as a setting for Tchaikovsky's opera The Oprichnik. In the end, the nobles and aristocrats rose up against the Oprichnina: Under conditions of mass terror, universal fear, and denunciations, the apparatus of violence created in the Oprichnina acquired an entirely overwhelming influence on the political structure of the leadership. In the final analysis, the infernal machine of terror escaped from the control of its creators.
    [Show full text]
  • SOVIET MYTHS in POST-SOVIET CULTURE by DARIA SERGUEYEVNA KABANOVA DISSERTATION Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Commit
    SITES OF MEMORY: SOVIET MYTHS IN POST-SOVIET CULTURE BY DARIA SERGUEYEVNA KABANOVA DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Comparative Literature with a minor in Cinema Studies in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2011 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Associate Professor Lilya Kaganovsky, Chair Professor Nancy Blake Associate Professor Anke Pinkert Associate Professor Richard Tempest ABSTRACT Do we treat 1990s as a gap, a rupture between the Soviet past and the post-Soviet present? Post-Soviet film and fiction certainly stage the break up of the Soviet Union and the end of Soviet rule in this way. Post-Soviet culture has left behind a certain set of Soviet cultural myths: the conquest of space, the normal functioning of Soviet life with clear sources of symbolic authority, the Soviet notion of heroism, etc. These myths have not been replaced with anything new. One can sense a real pause in films and texts from the late 80s and early 90s – as ideology, already exhausted by late socialism, takes a break. Eliot Borenstein speaks of the 1990s as a moment of a loss of national identity, of emasculation of Russian culture. Mikhail Epstein argues that the end of socialism created a loop in the time of national history, whereupon the Soviet future (communism) became the post-Soviet past. Aleksei Yurchak has shown that the utopian stability of the Soviet “forever” was lost in late socialism, staging a seemingly cataclysmic break up of the Soviet Union and its ideological constructs.
    [Show full text]
  • 7Th Grade History Lesson #32 : May 5, 2020
    7th Grade History Lesson #32 : May 5, 2020 Learning Target: I can detail the achievements of Ivan the Terrible. Lesson #32, Materials Needed For this lesson you’re going to need the following materials: ❏ Chromebook ❏ Pen or pencil ❏ Paper ❏ Cornell Notes Warm Up: Ivan III Ivan IV In yesterday’s lesson we discussed Ivan III, who is also known as Ivan the Great. Today we are going to talk about Ivan IV, who is also known as Ivan the Terrible. Before we get started I would like for you to brainstorm what makes someone a great ruler and what would make them terrible ruler? On your own sheet of paper jot down 2-3 characteristics of a good ruler and a terrible ruler. Warm Up: Ivan III In my opinion, a Ivan IV In yesterday’s lesson we discussed Ivan terrible ruler is reckless. They do III, who is also known as Ivan the Great. not care about their Today we are going to talk about Ivan IV, people. They make who is also known as Ivan the Terrible. bad decisions that leave their kingdom In my opinion, a great in a worst position Before we get started I would like for you ruler cares about his than when they rose to brainstorm what makes someone a great people. Is fair and to power. ruler and what would make them terrible just. Is responsible. They do not take ruler? On your own sheet of paper jot unnecessary risks. down 2-3 characteristics of a good ruler The make decisions that will improve their and a terrible ruler.
    [Show full text]
  • The Specter of a Stalinist Ivan the Terrible in Russia Today
    Penn History Review Volume 17 Issue 2 Spring 2010 Article 2 May 2010 Allegory's Half-Life: The Specter of a Stalinist Ivan the Terrible in Russia Today Kevin M. F. Platt University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/phr Recommended Citation Platt, Kevin M. F. (2010) "Allegory's Half-Life: The Specter of a Stalinist Ivan the Terrible in Russia Today," Penn History Review: Vol. 17 : Iss. 2 , Article 2. Available at: https://repository.upenn.edu/phr/vol17/iss2/2 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/phr/vol17/iss2/2 For more information, please contact [email protected]. 10 ALLEGORY ’S HALF -L IFE THE SPECTER OF A STALINIST IVAN THE TERRIBLE IN RUSSIA TODAY Kevin M. F. Platt OUR COUNTRY IS DIVIDED BETWEEN STATE AND SUBJECTS , WHICH IS TO SAY THAT THE PEOPLE IS NOT IDENTIFIED WITH THE STATE . T HE STATE IS A SEP - ARATE MACHINE , A SORT OF IDOL , TO WHICH ONE MUST PRAY AND IN THE NAME OF WHICH ONE MUST SACRIFICE ONESELF . I T SEEMS TO ME THAT IT WAS PRECISELY THE OPRICHNINA THAT PLAYED THE LEADING ROLE IN THE FORMATION OF SUCH A STATE STRUCTURE IN THE NATIONAL CONSCIOUS - NESS . T HE OPRICHNINA WAS A VERY FATEFUL AND VERY RUSSIAN PHENOM- ENON . VLADIMIR SOROKIN , 2007 4.4 W HO STANDS AT THE HEAD OF THE RUSSIAN STATE ? STUDENTS ARE ASKED TO LOOK AT THE PORTRAITS OF HEADS OF STATE AND THINK ABOUT THEIR CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE STATE .
    [Show full text]
  • Ivan the Terrible
    FAMOUS PATIENTS ALMA Culture&Medicine - Vol 1. N1 - November 2014 - Page _ 61 Ivan the Terrible Prof. Dr. Alfredo E. Buzzi Full Professor of Radiology. School of Medicine, University of Buenos Aires. Ivan the Terrible evokes one of the most fascinating and terrifying characters of history. A man of complex personality: he was described as a killer, insane, intelligent, intellectual, devout, reformist, eccentric etc. The story of his life was distorted by the propaganda both for and against him. Of all Russian Tsars, Ivan’s reign was the longest one. He developed the first modern absolutist state (he wanted to engage and learn from western countries). Today Ivan is considered a Russian national hero. Apparently, his dementia deepened after treating his syphilis with mercury salts. Eastern Europe’s plains comprise enormous large land after his father’s death (Basil III) (figure 1). Due to Ivan being areas which extend from the White to the Baltic seas in the only three years old, her mother Elena acted as regent until North, and from the Black to the Caspian seas in the south. her death. During five long years, she had to face the Tatars, Slavs populated those lands as from the 6º century and the Lithuanians, and above all, the boyars, the powerful founded cities like Novgorod, Kiev and Smolensk. Vikings aristocracy willing to retain their power. and Scandinavian gave origin to “Rus”, a medieval state and princedom around Kiev. He was orphaned at the age of 8 when his mother Elena died (apparently the boyars were involved in her death) and, Vladimir, who had been baptized by the Eastern Christian along with his deaf and dumb younger brother Yuri, had to Church, started the unification and spreading of Christian faith suffer the constant humiliation and manipulation of the throughout the Rus’ territories.
    [Show full text]
  • Memory Politics in Contemporary Russia
    Memory Politics in Contemporary Russia This book examines the societal dynamics of memory politics in Russia. Since Vladimir Putin became president, the Russian central government has increas- ingly actively employed cultural memory to claim political legitimacy and dis- credit all forms of political opposition. The rhetorical use of the past has become adefining characteristic of Russian politics, creating a historical foundation for the regime’s emphasis on a strong state and centralised leadership. Exploring memory politics, this book analyses a wide range of actors, from the central government and the Russian Orthodox Church to filmmaker and cultural heavyweight Nikita Mikhalkov and radical thinkers such as Alek- sandr Dugin. In addition, in view of the steady decline in media freedom since 2000, it critically examines the role of cinema and television in shaping and spreading these narratives. Thus, this book aims to promote a better understanding of the various means through which the Russian government practices its memory politics (e.g. the role of state media) while at the same time pointing to the existence of alternative and critical voices and criticism that existing studies tend to overlook. Contributing to current debates in the field of memory studies and of cur- rent affairs in Russia and Eastern Europe, this book will be of interest to scholars working in the fields of Russian studies, cultural memory studies, nationalism and national identity, political communication, film, television and media studies. Mariëlle Wijermars is a postdoctoral researcher at the Aleksanteri Institute, University of Helsinki. Studies in Contemporary Russia Series Editor: Markku Kivinen Studies in Contemporary Russia is a series of cutting-edge, contemporary studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Viktor Pelevin and Vladimir Sorokin
    THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MYTHOPOETICS OF POST-SOVIET LITERARY FICTION: VIKTOR PELEVIN AND VLADIMIR SOROKIN A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE DIVISION OF THE HUMANITIES IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF SLAVIC LANGUAGES AND LITERATURES BY THEODORE ORSON TROTMAN CHICAGO, ILLINOIS DECEMBER 2017 Table of Contents List of Figures iii Abstract iv Introduction 1 Chapter 1: Myth as History: Mythopoetics in Pelevin’s Chapaev and the Void 43 Chapter 2: From Conceptualism to Postmodernism: Vladimir Sorokin’s The Queue 72 Chapter 3: The Mythic and the Utopian: Visions of the Future in Viktor Pelevin’s S.N.U.F.F. 105 Chapter 4: The Resurgence of Literary Dystopia: Vladimir Sorokin’s Day of the Oprichnik as the Ironic Dystopia 128 Conclusion 154 Bibliography 165 ii List of Figures Figure 1: Putin and Zaldostanov at the Sevastopol Bike Show 151 iii Abstract I sought to answer four broadly-construed, fundamental questions when writing this dissertation: 1) What is the role of literary fiction in contemporary Russian culture, and what is its relationship with other elements of culture, e.g., mass culture, popular culture, and myth? 2) How is Russian postmodernist literary fiction related to its preceding movements, e.g., Sots-Art, Socialist Realism, and modernism? 3) What is the role of the genre of utopia in the literary culture of the post-Soviet era, and how is such utopianism related to Soviet myth, mass culture, and Socialist Realism? 4) What can the sub-genre of dystopia tell us about the future of Russian literary fiction, and how can we reconcile the current manifestations of dystopian fiction with both extant models of utopian literary fiction and contemporary Russian culture? I answer these questions through engagement with works of writers of particular significance to both post- Soviet, Russian culture and also to the literary culture that it breeds.
    [Show full text]