The Crimean Tatars

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Crimean Tatars THE CRIMEAN TATARS BRIAN GLYN WILLIAMS The Crimean Tatars From Soviet Genocide to Putin’s Conquest 3 3 Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and certain other countries Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press 198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America Published in the United Kingdom in 2016 by C. Hurst & Co. (Publishers) Ltd. Copyright © Oxford University Press 2016 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by license, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reproduction rights organization. Inquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above. You must not circulate this work in any other form and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer. ISBN 978–0–19–049470–4 A copy of this book’s Cataloging-in-Publication Data is on file with the Library of Congress. 1 3 5 7 9 8 6 4 2 Printed by Edwards Brothers, USA For Eren “Pasha” Altindag, Yetkin Altindag, Feruzan and Kemal Altindag and Ryan and Justin Williams CONTENTS Acknowledgements ix Prologue xi 1.âThe Pearl in the Tsar’s Crown 1 2.âDispossession: The Loss of the Crimean Homeland 9 3. Dar al Harb: The Nineteenth-Century Crimean Tatar Migrations to the Ottoman Empire 19 4. Va t a n : The Construction of the Crimean Fatherland 33 5.âSoviet Homeland: The Nationalization of the Crimean Tatar Identity in the USSR 57 6. Surgun: The Crimean Tatar Exile in Central Asia 89 7.âReturn: The Crimean Tatar Migrations from Central Asia to the Crimean Peninsula 117 Notes 161 Bibliography 177 About the Author 199 Index 201 vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost I would like to thank the numerous Crimean Tatars who invited me into their simple stone homes in the settlements of the Crimea and greeted me with their people’s legendary hospitality, despite their often tragic circumstances. In particular, I would like to thank Nuri Shevkiev and his won- derful wife Lilia and his children Emir and Elmaz for letting me live with them in their samostroi (self-built) home in the settlement of Marino near Simferopol. I still fondly recall the evenings gathered with the Shevkievs and Tatars from the surrounding houses eating homemade cigborek and drinking tea while collecting stories of the deportation, exile and return. I would also like to thank Mustafa Dzhemilev for taking the time to grant me interviews during my stay. It was a real honor to get to know the “Crimean Tatar Mandela” who sacrificed so much to lead his people from exile to their homeland. I would also like to thank Lilia Bujurova, Izzet Khairov, Alie Aki- mov, Fevzi Yakubov, Abdullah Balich, Reshat Dzhemilev and Server Karimov for the time they took to grant me interviews. In addition, I would like to thank my parents, Donna and Gareth, for encouraging me to travel the world as a young man and to respect other cul- tures. I would not be who I am today without their inspiration and guidance over these many years. I am also grateful to my wife Feyza Altindag for her support and patience with my obsession with the Crimean Tatars’ history. I also owe a huge debt of gratitude to my advisors at the University of Wis- consin who taught me Central Asian history, Uli Schamiloglu and Kemal Karpat. I would also like to say thanks to my colleagues at the University of Massachusetts-Dartmouth, Mark Santow and Len Travers, who provided me with the invaluable support I needed to produce this work. And as always I owe a huge debt of gratitude to my indispensable secretary, Sue Foley. ix PROLOGUE On the distant edge of Europe, where East meets West, Islam meets Christian- ity, and the world of the steppe nomad meets that of settled man lies the Crimean Peninsula. Since even before the classical era, when intrepid sailors from Greece arrived on its shores and interacted with the mysterious horse- riding peoples of the vast European plains who migrated to the Crimea’s interior, this borderland has been an outpost of the nomads from the east. It has also been a preserve of nations, an ethnic time capsule and palimpsest of lost Eurasian races. Located on the Black Sea shore of the Ukraine (whose name translates to “the Frontier” of the steppe in Russian), the Crimea has seen more than its share of conquering and migrating races. These races have, like waves coursing across the open steppes from the north and east, lapped up on its plains and cast their ethnic residue on the Crimea’s genetic makeup. It was here that the ancient Greek traders encountered the Scythian nomads, whose skill as horse-mounted archers gave birth to the legend of the half-horse, half-man Centaurs. After the Scythians came the nomadic Sarma- tians, the Goths and Attila’s Huns, followed by the Turkic Kipchaks (or Polovtsians, the “Men of the Plains” as they were known in Russian). But no nomadic race left as great an impact on the Crimea as the world-conquering Mongols. Storming across the Eurasian steppe from their home in distant Mongolia, the Mongols of Batu Khan (grandson of Genghis Khan) shattered the divided Russian principalities in the forests to the north and absorbed the vast hordes of Kipchak Turks of the south Ukrainian plains into their armies in the 1240s. The amalgam of pagan Mongols and Turkic Kipchaks then gradually converted to Islam and became known as “Tatars”. It was these horse-riding Turko-Mongol-Muslim Tatars that were to call the Crimea home until the present day. As the transcontinental Mongol world xi PROLOGUE empire fractured and collapsed in the mid to late 1300s, the Tatars of the Crimea and surrounding steppes continued to dominate much of Eastern Europe. While the Mongols were ultimately expelled from China and the Middle East in the mid fourteenth century, in the southern Ukraine the Tatars were an anachronism that continued their horse riding ways for centuries. Not even the liberation of Russia to the north from the Tatar Golden Horde in 1480 ended the power of the Crimean Tatars. By this time Khans (Geng- hisid rulers) of the Tatar Giray dynasty had established an independent Khan- ate in the Crimea and surrounding lands. The Tatar Khans of the Crimea, ruling from the fabled town of Bahcesaray (“Garden Palace”) in the southern Crimean mountains, saw the rising power of Russia and made a far-sighted alliance with another up-and-coming power, the Muslim Ottoman Empire. This alliance helped the Crimean Tatars maintain their independence even as Ivan the Terrible’s Russia inexorably expanded eastward across the vast forests of Siberia and down to the Caspian Sea, conquering the other Tatar remnants of the Mongol Golden Horde. Long after the Tatars of the Volga River region and plains north of the Caspian Sea had been absorbed into sixteenth-century Russia, the Crimean Tatars maintained their independence. As the memory of the Medieval Mongols faded in other parts of the world, the Crimean Tatars continued to roam freely on the plains on the edge of a modernizing Europe. Riding on their rugged steppe steeds with their fur rimmed, spiked helmets on chambuls (raids for cattle and slaves), the Tatars of the Crimea continued their ancient ways and kept the Russians off the open plains of southern Ukraine for centuries. The Tatars of the Crimea were able to burn Moscow as late as 1571. Every year the Tatars would sally forth from their bastion in the Kirim (“the Fortress”, the Turko-Mongol name which gives us the English word Crimea) to carry out vast slave raids into Poland, Russia and the Ukraine. Not even the modernizing Tsar Peter the Great could conquer the horse-riding Crimean heirs of Genghis Khan. In fact, the Crimean Tatars played a major role in the Turkish defeat of Tsar Peter’s inva- sion of Ottoman Eastern Europe in 1711. The incomparable Tatar horsemen also assisted the Ottoman sultans of Istanbul in their endless wars with the Christian West. The arrival of the Otto- man army in Eastern Europe was usually preceded by waves of mysterious Tatar horsemen, whom the Germans fearfully called “sackmen” and the Otto- man Turks admiringly called akinjis (literally “those who flow” over others’ lands). The only sign Christian villagers had that the fast riding Tatars were coming was the urgent ringing of the Turkenglocken (Turk Bells) warning xii PROLOGUE them of their impending arrival. While the main Ottoman army had to build bridges to cross rivers, the Tatar cavalry swam them. The hardy Tatars did not need cumbersome wagon trains to carry their provisions, they lived off the land and on bits of raw meat warmed beneath their saddle (hence the term “steak tartar” today). Covering vast distances at speeds that could not be believed, the Tatar outriders and skirmishers overwhelmed Austrian Habsburg positions and swarmed beyond Vienna, looting, enslaving Christians, and destroying small concentrations of troops. The arrival of the Tatar Khan for an Ottoman campaign was an occasion of much rejoicing for the Turks who considered his horsemen to be invincible.1 But the Tatars’ days as outriders for the Ottoman sultans gradually came to an end, largely due to events bigger than themselves.
Recommended publications
  • The Crimean Khanate, Ottomans and the Rise of the Russian Empire*
    STRUGGLE FOR EAST-EUROPEAN EMPIRE: 1400-1700 The Crimean Khanate, Ottomans and the Rise of the Russian Empire* HALİL İNALCIK The empire of the Golden Horde, built by Batu, son of Djodji and the grand son of Genghis Khan, around 1240, was an empire which united the whole East-Europe under its domination. The Golden Horde empire comprised ali of the remnants of the earlier nomadic peoples of Turkic language in the steppe area which were then known under the common name of Tatar within this new political framework. The Golden Horde ruled directly över the Eurasian steppe from Khwarezm to the Danube and över the Russian principalities in the forest zone indirectly as tribute-paying states. Already in the second half of the 13th century the western part of the steppe from the Don river to the Danube tended to become a separate political entity under the powerful emir Noghay. In the second half of the 14th century rival branches of the Djodjid dynasty, each supported by a group of the dissident clans, started a long struggle for the Ulugh-Yurd, the core of the empire in the lower itil (Volga) river, and for the title of Ulugh Khan which meant the supreme ruler of the empire. Toktamish Khan restored, for a short period, the unity of the empire. When defeated by Tamerlane, his sons and dependent clans resumed the struggle for the Ulugh-Khan-ship in the westem steppe area. During ali this period, the Crimean peninsula, separated from the steppe by a narrow isthmus, became a refuge area for the defeated in the steppe.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Russia Better Through Her History: Sevastopol, an Enduring Geostrategic Centre of Gravity
    UNDERSTANDING RUSSIA BETTER THROUGH HER HISTORY: SEVASTOPOL, AN ENDURING GEOSTRATEGIC CENTRE OF GRAVITY Recent events in Crimea, Eastern Ukraine and Syria have aerospace industries, made Sevastopol a closed city during brought Russia’s increasingly assertive foreign policy and the Cold War. Thereafter, despite being under Ukrainian burgeoning military power into sharp relief. Such shows of jurisdiction until March 2014, it remained very much a force surprised those in the West who thought that a new, Russian city, in which the Russian national flag always flew pacific and friendly Russia would emerge from the former higher than the Ukrainian. Soviet Union. That has never been Russia’s way as a major Furthermore, the Russian world power. This monograph argues that Vladimir Putin’s Navy continued to control the “” Russia has done no more than act in an historically consistent port leased from the Ukraine, Sevastopol’s and largely predictable manner. Specifically, it seeks to including its navigation systems. population, explain why possession of Sevastopol – the home of the Sevastopol’s population, Black Sea Fleet for more than 200 years – provides Russia containing many military containing many with considerable geostrategic advantage, one that is being retirees and their dependants, military retirees and exploited today in support of her current operations in Syria. remained fiercely loyal to Russia their dependants, and never accepted Ukrainian Sevastopol, and more particularly its ancient predecessor, rule – which they judged as a remained fiercely the former Greek city of Chersonesos, has a highly-symbolic historical accident at best, or, at loyal to Russia and place in Russia’s history and sense of nationhood.
    [Show full text]
  • Title of Thesis: ABSTRACT CLASSIFYING BIAS
    ABSTRACT Title of Thesis: CLASSIFYING BIAS IN LARGE MULTILINGUAL CORPORA VIA CROWDSOURCING AND TOPIC MODELING Team BIASES: Brianna Caljean, Katherine Calvert, Ashley Chang, Elliot Frank, Rosana Garay Jáuregui, Geoffrey Palo, Ryan Rinker, Gareth Weakly, Nicolette Wolfrey, William Zhang Thesis Directed By: Dr. David Zajic, Ph.D. Our project extends previous algorithmic approaches to finding bias in large text corpora. We used multilingual topic modeling to examine language-specific bias in the English, Spanish, and Russian versions of Wikipedia. In particular, we placed Spanish articles discussing the Cold War on a Russian-English viewpoint spectrum based on similarity in topic distribution. We then crowdsourced human annotations of Spanish Wikipedia articles for comparison to the topic model. Our hypothesis was that human annotators and topic modeling algorithms would provide correlated results for bias. However, that was not the case. Our annotators indicated that humans were more perceptive of sentiment in article text than topic distribution, which suggests that our classifier provides a different perspective on a text’s bias. CLASSIFYING BIAS IN LARGE MULTILINGUAL CORPORA VIA CROWDSOURCING AND TOPIC MODELING by Team BIASES: Brianna Caljean, Katherine Calvert, Ashley Chang, Elliot Frank, Rosana Garay Jáuregui, Geoffrey Palo, Ryan Rinker, Gareth Weakly, Nicolette Wolfrey, William Zhang Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Gemstone Honors Program, University of Maryland, 2018 Advisory Committee: Dr. David Zajic, Chair Dr. Brian Butler Dr. Marine Carpuat Dr. Melanie Kill Dr. Philip Resnik Mr. Ed Summers © Copyright by Team BIASES: Brianna Caljean, Katherine Calvert, Ashley Chang, Elliot Frank, Rosana Garay Jáuregui, Geoffrey Palo, Ryan Rinker, Gareth Weakly, Nicolette Wolfrey, William Zhang 2018 Acknowledgements We would like to express our sincerest gratitude to our mentor, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • "Вертолеты России" № 2(28) 2016 01.08.2016
    № 2 (28) / 2016 СПРОС НА РОССИЙСКИЕ ВЕРТОЛЕТЫ О С ТА Е ТС Я В Ы СО К И М THE DEMAND FOR RUSSIAN HELICOPTERS REMAINS HIGH ПОКОРИТЕЛИ МОРЯ: ВЕРТОЛЕТЫ ДЛЯ ВОЕННОМОРСКОГО ФЛОТА ЛЮБОЙ АНГОЛЕЦ ВАМ СКАЖЕТ: «Я ЗНАЮ МИ8» CONQUERORS OF THE SEA: MARINE HELICOPTERS ANY ANGOLAN WILL TELL YOU: “I KNOW MI8” RHmag_Cov_2016-3.indd 1 22/08/16 14:56 № 2 (28) / 2016 15 23 47 ОБРАЩЕНИЕ К ЧИТАТЕЛЯМ | APPEAL TO READERS МЕЖДУНАРОДНЫЕ РЫНКИ | INTERNATIONAL MARKETS Обращение генерального директора А. А. Михеева . .2 «Вертолеты России» на KADEX-2016: Message from CEO Alexander Mikheev демонстрация возможностей . .15 Russian Helicopters at KADEX 2016: demonstration of capabilities НОВОСТИ ХОЛДИНГА | HOLDING NEWS «Вертолеты России» примут участие в военно- Российские вертолеты в тропической Африке . .18 техническом форуме «Армия-2016» . .4 Russian helicopters in Sub-Saharan Africa Russian Helicopters to participate in the Military-Technical Forum Army-2016 СТРАТЕГИЯ | STRATEGY Делегация Мьянмы оценила перспективы Покорители моря вертолеты сотрудничества с «Вертолетами России» . .5 для Военно-морского флота . .23 A delegation from Myanmar evaluates cooperation prospects with Russian Conquerors of the Sea Marine Helicopters Helicopters ТЕХНОЛОГИИ | TECHNOLOGIES Холдинг «Вертолеты России» поставил в Китай Александр Охонько, гендиректор «ВР-Технологии»: четвертый Ми-26ТС . .6 «Рынок беспилотников в России Russian Helicopters supplies fourth Mi-26TS helicopter to China активно формируется» . .29 Alexander Okhonko: the CEO of VR-Technologies: «Вертолеты России» передали Министерству “The drone market in Russia is actively developing” обороны РФ первую партию новых Ми-8АМТШ . .7 Russian Helicopters supplies the first batch of new Mi-8AMTSh to the Russian СОТРУДНИЧЕСТВО | COOPERATION Ministry of Defense Вертолетные двигатели: сделано в России .
    [Show full text]
  • Rotefan Eloyan Markosovish Prisoner Petition Letter to Comrade
    See also Vladislav Eloyan and Michael McKibben with Joseph Lipsius and George West. "Eloyan Rotefan Marcosovich. A Newly Discovered 69th Inf. Div Legacy of Spirit, Resilience and Valor. 69th Inf Div 271st Inf Reg AT Co". The U.S. Army 69th Infantry Division Association Website. July 4, 2010. Petition Letter <http://www.69th-infantry-division.com/whowhere/photoo3-Eloyan- Rotefan-Marcosovich.html>. Last updated December 21, 2010. Original Russian Petition Letter follows. From: Eloyan Rotefan Markosovich, Prisoner To: Comrade Malenkov, Chairman of the Council of Ministers of the USSR1 Date: 22 October 1953 I would like to introduce myself and describe the recent events in Norilsk briefly. I was born in Erevan in 1925 and moved to Moscow with by brother and father in 1930. In 1941 I finished seven years of education in school No. 279. In July 1941 at only 15 years old I joined the Red Army as a volunteer in an armored cavalry battalion of the 13th Rifle Division. On 22 October I was severely wounded near Vyazma city and picked up by an army ambulance from the village of Proletarskoe. A week later our ambulance detail was captured by Germans. After I had partially recovered, I escaped on crutches and wandered into the Smolensk district. Since I was only 16 years old, the Germans didn’t ask me for documents, so I roamed from village to village with some of my friends. My wounds healed slowly, making it difficult to walk for the longest time. I was once sheltered by Ivan Mikheev at his house in the village of Kamentshiki.
    [Show full text]
  • The Crimean Tatars and Their Russian-Captive Slaves an Aspect of Muscovite-Crimean Relations in the 16Th and 17Th Centuries
    The Crimean Tatars and their Russian-Captive Slaves An Aspect of Muscovite-Crimean Relations in the 16th and 17th Centuries Eizo MATSUKI The Law Code of Tsar Aleksei Mikhailovich (Ulozhenie), being formed of 25 chapters and divided into 976 articles, is the last and the most systematic codification of Muscovite Law in early modern Russia. It was compiled in 1649, that is more than one and a half centuries after Russia’s political “Independence” from Mongol-Tatar Rule. Chapter VIII of this Law Code, comprised of 7 articles and titled “The Redemption of Military Captives”, however, reveals that Muscovite Russia at the mid-17th century was yet suffering from frequent Tatar raids into its populated territory. The raids were to capture Russian people and sell them as slaves. Because of this situation, the Muscovite government was forced to create a special annual tax (poronianichnyi zbor) to prepare a financial fund needed for ransoming Russian captive-slaves from the Tatars.1 Chapter VIII, article 1 imposes an annual levy on the common people of all Russia: 8 dengi per household for town people as well as church peasants; 4 dengi for other peasants; and 2 dengi for lower service men. On the other hand, articles 2-7 of this chapter established norms for ransom-payment to the Tatars according to the rank of the Russian captives: for gentry (dvoriane) and lesser gentry (deti boiarskie) twenty rubles per 100 chetvert’ of their service land-estate (pomest’e); for lesser ranks such as Musketeers (strel’tsy),2 Cossacks, townspeople, and peasants a fixed payment from ten to forty rubles each.
    [Show full text]
  • International Crimes in Crimea
    International Crimes in Crimea: An Assessment of Two and a Half Years of Russian Occupation SEPTEMBER 2016 Contents I. Introduction 6 A. Executive summary 6 B. The authors 7 C. Sources of information and methodology of documentation 7 II. Factual Background 8 A. A brief history of the Crimean Peninsula 8 B. Euromaidan 12 C. The invasion of Crimea 15 D. Two and a half years of occupation and the war in Donbas 23 III. Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court 27 IV. Contextual elements of international crimes 28 A. War crimes 28 B. Crimes against humanity 34 V. Willful killing, murder and enforced disappearances 38 A. Overview 38 B. The law 38 C. Summary of the evidence 39 D. Documented cases 41 E. Analysis 45 F. Conclusion 45 VI. Torture and other forms of inhuman treatment 46 A. Overview 46 B. The law 46 C. Summary of the evidence 47 D. Documented cases of torture and other forms of inhuman treatment 50 E. Analysis 59 F. Conclusion 59 VII. Illegal detention 60 A. Overview 60 B. The law 60 C. Summary of the evidence 62 D. Documented cases of illegal detention 66 E. Analysis 87 F. Conclusion 87 VIII. Forced displacement 88 A. Overview 88 B. The law 88 C. Summary of evidence 90 D. Analysis 93 E. Conclusion 93 IX. Crimes against public, private and cultural property 94 A. Overview 94 B. The law 94 C. Summary of evidence 96 D. Documented cases 99 E. Analysis 110 F. Conclusion 110 X. Persecution and collective punishment 111 A. Overview 111 B.
    [Show full text]
  • The Formation of Wartime Commercial Policy
    Planning for the Short Haul: The Formation of Wartime Commercial Policy Mariya Grinberg [email protected] Draft paper prepared for IPES, November 18, 2017. Please do not cite or circulate without permission of the author. In times of war, why do belligerents continue to trade with each other? There are two countervailing forces that affect this decision. On the one hand, conventional wisdom in economics holds that states have absolute gains from trade. Therefore, economic considerations should push states to engage in mutually beneficial trading relationships, regardless of the security environment. In other words, states should always trade with the enemy. On the other hand, conventional wisdom in international relations holds that trading with a security adversary has negative security externalities. A state can use these benefits from trade to increase its military capabilities which, in turn, can be used in the war effort against the state it is trading with. Thus according to security considerations, states should never trade with the enemy. Empirically, it is possible to see wide variation in the choices states make about their wartime commercial policy. Some states chose to continue their trade throughout the war, for example India and Pakistan in the Kargil War (1999) or Yugoslavia and Croatia in the War of Bosnian Independence (1992). Other states chose to cut off trade immediately at the start of the war, for example India and Pakistan in the Second Kashmir War (1965) or England and Argentina in the Falkland Islands War (1982). Yet other states start off trading with the enemy only to change course during the war and sever the commercial relationship in the middle of the conflict, as for example occurred in the Iran-Iraq War of 1980.
    [Show full text]
  • Up to Their Elbows in Blood: the Crimean War and The
    UP TO THEIR ELBOWS IN BLOOD: THE CRIMEAN WAR AND THE PROFESSIONALIZATION OF MEDICINE Fought in the mid-1850s, many scholars regard the Crimean War as largely insignificant. However in reality, the historical contributions of the war are important – particularly those contributions pertaining to medicine. This seemingly “unnecessary” war facilitated the modernization of Western medicine; methods used during and directly after the Crimean War were standard until World War Two. A brief history of the war reveals medical data that constitutes the bulk of my interpretation. The war’s specific medical achievements are highlighted throughout the essay. The findings in this paper are by no means conclusive, but they exhibit that it is important to look beyond Florence Nightingale, the war’s most famous and studied individual, and gaze upon the larger trends of medicine. Her story is covered in some detail in this paper, but she is not the sole source of innovation from this rather disastrous war. The professionalization of Western medicine stands out as one of the great accomplishments of this war, despite scholars viewing the war as useless. Key words: cholera epidemics, battlefield surgery, Florence Nightingale, Nikolay Pirogov, William Howard Russell, medical modernization Tyler Eaves HIST 586: Advanced Seminar in History May 11, 2017 Eaves 2 “It is good for us to be here”1 On the night of November 14, 1854, an exhausted woman penned a letter to a distant reader. By candlelight she scrawled in hurried script about the “appalling horror” surrounding her. “Steeped up to [their] necks in blood,” she and her helpers worked tirelessly upon men who “bear pain and mutilation with unshrinking heroism, and die or are cut up without a complaint.” Absences of brooms, soap, and towels only complicated the dire state of affairs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Northern Black Sea Region in Classical Antiquity 4
    The Northern Black Sea Region by Kerstin Susanne Jobst In historical studies, the Black Sea region is viewed as a separate historical region which has been shaped in particular by vast migration and acculturation processes. Another prominent feature of the region's history is the great diversity of religions and cultures which existed there up to the 20th century. The region is understood as a complex interwoven entity. This article focuses on the northern Black Sea region, which in the present day is primarily inhabited by Slavic people. Most of this region currently belongs to Ukraine, which has been an independent state since 1991. It consists primarily of the former imperial Russian administrative province of Novorossiia (not including Bessarabia, which for a time was administered as part of Novorossiia) and the Crimean Peninsula, including the adjoining areas to the north. The article also discusses how the region, which has been inhabited by Scythians, Sarmatians, Greeks, Romans, Goths, Huns, Khazars, Italians, Tatars, East Slavs and others, fitted into broader geographical and political contexts. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. Space of Myths and Legends 3. The Northern Black Sea Region in Classical Antiquity 4. From the Khazar Empire to the Crimean Khanate and the Ottomans 5. Russian Rule: The Region as Novorossiia 6. World War, Revolutions and Soviet Rule 7. From the Second World War until the End of the Soviet Union 8. Summary and Future Perspective 9. Appendix 1. Sources 2. Literature 3. Notes Indices Citation Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • The Crimean Tatar Question: a Prism for Changing Nationalisms and Rival Versions of Eurasianism*
    The Crimean Tatar Question: A Prism for Changing Nationalisms and Rival Versions of Eurasianism* Andrew Wilson Abstract: This article discusses the ongoing debates about Crimean Tatar identity, and the ways in which the Crimean Tatar question has been crucial to processes of reshaping Ukrainian identity during and after the Euromaidan. The Crimean Tatar question, it is argued, is a key test in the struggle between civic and ethnic nationalism in the new Ukraine. The article also looks at the manner in which the proponents of different versions of “Eurasianism”—Russian, Volga Tatar, and Crimean Tatar—have approached the Crimean Tatar question, and how this affects the attitudes of all these ethnic groups to the Russian annexation of Crimea. Key words: Crimean Tatars, Euromaidan, Eurasianism, national identity, nationalism—civic and ethnic Introduction In the period either side of the Russian annexation of Crimea, the Crimean Tatar issue has become a lodestone for redefining the national identities of all the parties involved. The mainstream Crimean Tatar movement has been characterized by steadfast opposition first to the Yanukovych regime in Ukraine and then to Russian rule. This position has strengthened its longstanding ideology of indigenousness and special rights, but it has also * The author is extremely grateful to Ridvan Bari Urcosta for his invaluable help with research for this article, to Bob Deen and Zahid Movlazada at the OSCE HCNM, to Professor Paul Robert Magocsi, and to the anonymous reviewers who made useful comments and criticisms. 1 2 ANDREW WILSON belatedly cemented its alliance with Ukrainian nationalism. Meanwhile, Ukraine’s would‐be new supra‐ethnic civic identity draws heavily on the Crimean Tatar contribution.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkic Lexical Elements in the Bulgarian Language DOI
    Albina G. Khayrullina-Valieva* Turkic Lexical Elements in the Bulgarian Language DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/LC.2020.015 This article is devoted to the study of Turkic loan words in the vocabulary of the Bulgarian language. „By Turkic lexical elements we mean all the originally Turkic words that entered the Bulgarian language from any Turkic language, and words of any other origin (Arabic, Persian, Greek, Italian, etc.), that have entered the Bulgarian language through the Turkic languages” (Czumbałowa 1986: 8). Famous Bulgarian scholar Samuel Bernstein points out that the beginning of a serious study of Turkism in the Bulgarian language was set by Franz Xaver Ritter von Miklosich with his fundamental researchDie türkischen Elemente in der südost- und osteuropäischen Sprachen. He distinguished three periods of intensive influence of Turkic-speaking peoples on the languages of south-Eastern and Eastern Europe: the initial period – the first centuries of our era; the second period – at the end of 7th century; the third 205 period – the arrival and settlement of Ottoman Turks in the Balkans. This influence was not limited only to lexical borrowings, but there are also traces of the influence of Turkic speech on word formation and syntax. So far the periodization proposed by Nikolay Baskakov has been the most successful. According to it, the first period was characterized by „the penetration of the Hun tribes 1(33) 2020 into Eastern Europe and the Black Sea region, the earliest of which are known as the Huns, Avars, Sabirs, Suvars, etc., and at a later time, beginning with the 4th–5th centuries AD, under the name of the Bulgars and Khazars”.
    [Show full text]