The University of Arizona
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Overview and Status of the Giant Magellan Telescope Project
Invited Paper Overview and Status of the Giant Magellan Telescope Project Patrick J. McCarthy*,a,b, James Fansona, Rebecca Bernsteina,b, David Ashbyc, Bruce Bigelowa, Nune Boyadjiana, Antonin Boucheza, Eric Chauvina, Eduardo Donosoa, Jose Filgueiraa, Robert Goodricha, Frank Groarka, George Jacobya, Eric Pearcea aGMTO Corporation, 451 N. Halstead St., Suite 250, Pasadena, CA 91107, USA bCarnegie Observatories, 813 Santa Barbara St., Pasadena, CA 91101, USA cLarge Binocular Telescope Observatory, Tucson AZ ABSTRACT The Giant Magellan Telescope Project is in the construction phase. Production of the primary mirror segments is underway with four of the seven required 8.4m mirrors at various stages of completion and materials purchased for segments five and six. Development of the infrastructure at the GMT site at Las Campanas is nearing completion. Power, water and data connections sufficient to support the construction of the telescope and enclosure are in place and roads to the summit have been widened and graded to support transportation of large and heavy loads. Construction pads for the support buildings have been graded and the construction residence is being installed. A small number of issues need to be resolved before the final design of the telescope structure and enclosure can proceed and the GMT team is collecting the required inputs to the decision making process. Prototyping activities targeted at the active and adaptive optics systems are allowing us to finalize designs before large scale production of components begins. Our technically driven schedule calls for the telescope to be assembled on site in 2022 and to be ready to receive a subset of the primary and secondary mirror optics late in the year. -
Birds of Coniferous Forest on Mount Graham, Arizona
Wilson Bull., 107(4), 1995, pp. 719-723 SHORT COMMUNICATIONS Birds of coniferous forest on Mount Graham, Arizona.-Because of interest in the effect upon the biota of Mount Graham by current development for astronomy, I repeated observations and censuses made there forty years ago. Avifaunal changes have occurred. Unlike my companion study in the Sierra Nevada (Marshall 1988), the losses at Mount Graham of nesting species-all at the lower altitudinal limit of Pinus Zeiophylla chihuahuana and P. ponderosa arizonica-lack an obvious connection to human interference with the environment. Study area.-Mount Graham, in southeastern Arizona, is capped with old growth Engel- mann spruce and alpine fir from 3000 m to the summit at 3267 m. This boreal forest of 8 km* is at its southernmost limits on the North American continent. Descending, one passes through other vegetation zones in sequence: Douglas firs and white firs mixed with spruce, and then mixed with Mexican white pines; south slopes of New Mexican locust and Gambel oak; ponderosa pine with Gambel oak, ponderosa pine mixed with silver-leaf oak; and finally Chihuahua pine with Arizona oak (Martin and Fletcher 1943, Hoffmeister 1956, Marshall 1957, Mohlenbrock 1987). From memory, notes, and photographs I detect no change in vegetation during the forty-year study period. Specifically, the trees at the mapped census area in Wet Canyon (Fig. 1) have not closed ranks about the little openings suitable for those foothill birds that forage among grasses, boulders, manzanitas, and nolinas. The mesic luxuriance of Mount Graham’s vegetation is shown by running streams sup- porting tall groves of maples, by the enormous Douglas firs that remain, by the profusion of understory flowers and green forbs, and by the gigantic stature of clear-trunked alders dominating Wet Canyon. -
Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 04/01/2021 to 06/30/2021 Coronado National Forest This Report Contains the Best Available Information at the Time of Publication
Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 04/01/2021 to 06/30/2021 Coronado National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring Nationwide Gypsy Moth Management in the - Vegetation management Completed Actual: 11/28/2012 01/2013 Susan Ellsworth United States: A Cooperative (other than forest products) 775-355-5313 Approach [email protected]. EIS us *UPDATED* Description: The USDA Forest Service and Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service are analyzing a range of strategies for controlling gypsy moth damage to forests and trees in the United States. Web Link: http://www.na.fs.fed.us/wv/eis/ Location: UNIT - All Districts-level Units. STATE - All States. COUNTY - All Counties. LEGAL - Not Applicable. Nationwide. Locatable Mining Rule - 36 CFR - Regulations, Directives, In Progress: Expected:12/2021 12/2021 Sarah Shoemaker 228, subpart A. Orders NOI in Federal Register 907-586-7886 EIS 09/13/2018 [email protected] d.us *UPDATED* Est. DEIS NOA in Federal Register 03/2021 Description: The U.S. Department of Agriculture proposes revisions to its regulations at 36 CFR 228, Subpart A governing locatable minerals operations on National Forest System lands.A draft EIS & proposed rule should be available for review/comment in late 2020 Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=57214 Location: UNIT - All Districts-level Units. STATE - All States. COUNTY - All Counties. LEGAL - Not Applicable. These regulations apply to all NFS lands open to mineral entry under the US mining laws. -
Campus Building & Department Index- Alphabetical
CAMPUS BUILDING & DEPARTMENT INDEX- ALPHABETICAL 2009-2010 A --- Electrical & Computer Nuerology Clinic 522 (F1) Adminstration 66 (D5) Engineering Bldg. 104 (C4) Nugent, Robert L. 40 (C6) Admissions, Office of 40 (C6) Engineering & Mines, College of 72 (C4) Nursing, College of 203 (F2) African American Studies 128 (D4) Engineering Building 20 (C5) O --- Agricultural Sciences 38 (C6) Dennis DeConcini Environment Old Main Building 21 (C5) Agriculture, College of 36 (C6) & Natural Resources Bldg. 120 (B7) Optical Science(Meinel) 94 (F6) A.M.E. Building 119 (D3) Extended University 158 (A5) P --- Apache Hall 50A (D7) F --- Park Ave. Parking Garage 116 (B3) Architecture, College of 75 (C4) Facilities Mgmt., AHSC 206 (E1) Park Student Center 87 (A6) Art Annex, Ceramics 470 (C3) Facilities Mgmt., Annex 460 (E1) Parking and Transportation Services 181 (C7) AZ Coop. Wildlife & Fishery Facilities Mgmt., Renovation 470 (D3) Payroll Department 158 (A5) Research Unit 43 (D6) Facilities Mgmt. Warehouse 215 (E1) Pharmacy, College of 207 (F2) Arizona Hall 84 (A7) Faculty Office Building 220 (E1) PHASE 420 (B3) Arizona Health Sciences Ctr. 201 (F2) Faculty Senate Office 456 (C2) Physics & Atmospheric Science (PAS) 81 (C6) Basic Services 201 (F2) Family & Consumer Res. 33 (B6) Pima Hall 135 (D4) Biomed. Research Lab 209 (E1) Family Practice Unit, AHSC 204 (E2) Pinal Hall 59 (E7) Bookstore 201 (F2) Fine Arts, Faculty of 4 (B4) Plantarium, Flandrau 91 (E5) Cancer Center 222 (F2) Fluid Dynamics Res. Lab 112 (C4) Planetary Sci., Dept. of 92 (E5) Central Heat/Refrig. 205 (E2) Forbes (Agriculture) 36 (C6) Police Department 100 (F4) Cl. Sci. -
Volcanic Craters of the Pinacate Mountains, Sonora, Mexico
O"r/l MARICOPA \ r I I r- ···� . ____ . / � · . _·.· . / r I PIN A L . TORTOLITA . �\ . / MTS. a n a CIMARRON '\... �, t MTS. .. .�! 7-'cou��- --------- �I _\ h \ � :. / 'i.. , � - VentanaX, , ' . JI Cave ......\. � �',_ ... -- ( -;." 'fl _..D I __ Vaya Chin : F' G I Achiu � � r .. .. PA P A 0 . GlI ---. SIERRA �/ / '", , BLANCA ' MTS. ., G \ \ INDIAN D' Wahok \ Hotrontk ---L--.. Ovef'lap with . tv f U1 'igUr8� tv I I \ I I I 'I _ .. ·�-t i F (. -.... -- v"'-t :: .. �::. 5__6/1s ,.-\. '-...- Sells � I t-- 1. / <" I �/'<S ..°0 : '-'- '0 _/ '-:.. V �:I C " " _ . A'. "- � '� . N EXPLAN ATION " � , . .O. J " r " . -t- � , I V'.. .............. .. "--.. \ , '''.''''''''.. ' ''- :' '''- '" eo t< I .0 .' ::,."<"/ . "" 0' . I . • Numbered QJare a s desi gnate - ... , ••• . " 0.' -........ �I .-\ . C,o" I \ "$o '). figures te '- , -....I" < 0 ", ' x �fT "" c.\"/ � . I- in t . " REN. \ / ' \,g. ';; r. \ . ,. -""- ,JI ' '" :!., �" I "" ) I I lO "- ��, '\ I I I ° " " yJ ........ "- ". � s e a Ie , � , ."- , "','" ,,,,�, FIGURE 55. Index map of a part of central southern Arizona showing route of east half of Field Trip VI, locations and figure numbers of maps for Field Trip s I, II, III, and IV and related articles, and gener alized locations of diagrammatic cross sections shown in figures 56, 59, and 60. � Pinacates-Trip VI- l VOLCANIC CRATERS OF THE PINACATE MOUNTAINS, SONORA, MEXICO TRIP VI, ROAD LOG First Day, Sunday, Ap ril 5, 1959 Leaders: F. W. Galbraith, L. A. Heindl, and G. G. Sykes Driving Distance: 200. 7 miles Logged Distance: 200. 7 miles Note: This trip will leave at 6:00 A. M. from the parking lot north of the Geology building . -
Bear Wallow-Mt. Lemmon Area, Santa Catalina
Structural geology of the Mt. Bigelow-Bear Wallow- Mt. Lemmon area, Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic); maps Authors Waag, Charles Joseph, 1931- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 11/10/2021 07:04:44 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/565165 STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY OF THE MT. BIGELOW- BEAR WALLOW-MT. LEMMON AREA, SANTA CATALINA MOUNTAINS, ARIZONA by Charles Joseph Waag A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 19 6 8 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE I hereby recommend that this dissertation prepared under my direction by Charles J« Waag_________________________________ entitled STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY OF THE MT. BIGELOW-BEAR WALLOW- MT. LEMMON AREA, SANTA CATALINA MOUNTAINS, ARIZONA be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy______________________________ % /96r After inspection of the final copy of the dissertation, the following members of the Final Examination Committee concur in its approval and recommend its acceptance:* This approval and acceptance is contingent on the candidate's adequate performance and defense of this dissertation at the final oral examination. The inclusion of this sheet bound into the library copy of the dissertation is evidence of satisfactory performance at the final examination. -
Highly Sampled Measurements in a Controlled Atmosphere at the Biosphere 2 Landscape Evolution Observatory
www.nature.com/scientificdata OpEN Highly sampled measurements Data DEscRiptor in a controlled atmosphere at the Biosphere 2 Landscape Evolution Observatory Jorge Arevalo 1,2 ✉ , Xubin Zeng 1,3, Matej Durcik3, Michael Sibayan4, Luke Pangle5, Nate Abramson6, Aaron Bugaj3, Wei-Ren Ng3, Minseok Kim3, Greg Barron-Gaford 3,7, Joost van Haren3,8,9, Guo-Yue Niu 1,3, John Adams3, Joaquin Ruiz3,6 & Peter A. Troch1,3 Land-atmosphere interactions at diferent temporal and spatial scales are important for our understanding of the Earth system and its modeling. The Landscape Evolution Observatory (LEO) at Biosphere 2, managed by the University of Arizona, hosts three nearly identical artifcial bare-soil hillslopes with dimensions of 11 × 30 m2 (1 m depth) in a controlled and highly monitored environment within three large greenhouses. These facilities provide a unique opportunity to explore these interactions. The dataset presented here is a subset of the measurements in each LEO’s hillslopes, from 1 July 2015 to 30 June 2019 every 15 minutes, consisting of temperature, water content and heat fux of the soil (at 5 cm depth) for 12 co-located points; temperature, relative humidity and wind speed above ground at 5 locations and 5 diferent heights ranging from 0.25 m to 9–10 m; 3D wind at 1 location; the four components of radiation at 2 locations; spatially aggregated precipitation rates, total subsurface discharge, and relative water storage; and the measurements from a weather station outside the greenhouses. Background & Summary Te understanding of land-atmosphere interactions is important for improvements in Earth System Modelling1–3 for climate assessment, weather prediction, and subseasonal-to-seasonal forecasts4. -
Draft Coronado Revised Plan
Coronado National United States Forest Department of Agriculture Forest Draft Land and Service Resource Management August 2011 Plan The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TTY). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Printed on recycled paper – Month and Year Draft Land and Resource Management Plan Coronado National Forest Cochise, Graham, Pima, Pinal, and Santa Cruz Counties, Arizona Hidalgo County, New Mexico Responsible Official: Regional Forester Southwestern Region 333 Broadway Boulevard SE Albuquerque, NM 87102 (505) 842-3292 For more information contact: Forest Planner Coronado National Forest 300 West Congress, FB 42 Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 388-8300 TTY 711 [email protected] ii Draft Land and Management Resource Plan Coronado National Forest Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction ...................................................................................... 1 Purpose of Land and Resource Management Plan ......................................... 1 Overview of the Coronado National Forest ..................................................... -
Building Manager Alternate 2 Art Building Manager Albert Chamillard 621-95093/520-954-9654 [email protected] Dept
Bldg. No. Building Name Department Dean/Dir/dept Head/Resp Person Room # Phone Building Manager Alternate 2 Art Building Manager Albert Chamillard 621-95093/520-954-9654 [email protected] Dept. 2201 only Alternate James Kushner 621-7567/520-419-0944 [email protected] Alternate Kristen Schmidt 621-9510/520-289-3123 [email protected] Dept. 3504 School of Art only Building Manager Carrie M. Scharf Art 108 621-1464/520-488-7869 [email protected] Alternate Ginette K. Gonzalez 621-1251 [email protected] Alternate Maria Sanchez 621-7000 [email protected] Alternate Michelle Stone-Eklund 108 621-7001 [email protected] 2A Art Museum Building Manager Carrie M. Scharf 621-1464 [email protected] Alternate Michell Stone-Eklund 621-7001 [email protected] Alternate Ginette K. Gonzalez 621-1251 [email protected] 3/3A Drama Dept. 3509 School of Theatre, Film & Television Building Manager Edward Kraus 621-1104/678-457-0092 [email protected] Alternate Stacy Dugan 621-1561/520-834-2196 [email protected] Alternate Jennifer Lang 621-1277/626-321-7264 [email protected] Dept. 3504 School of Art only Building Manager Carrie M. Scharf 621-1464/520-488-7869 [email protected] Alternate Ginette K. Gonzalez 621-1251 [email protected] Alternate Maria Sanchez 621-7000 [email protected] Alternate Michelle Stone-Eklund 621-7001 [email protected] 4/4A Fred Fox School of Music Building Manager Carson Scott 621-9853/520-235-5071 [email protected] Alternate Owen Witzeman 520-272-2446 [email protected] Alternate Kiara Johnson 760-445-5458 [email protected] 5 Coconino Hall Building Manager Alex Blandeburgo Likins A104 621-4173 [email protected] Alternate Megan Mesches 621-6644 [email protected] 6 Slonaker Dept. -
Coronado National Forest Draft Land and Resource Management Plan I Contents
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Coronado National Forest Southwestern Region Draft Land and Resource MB-R3-05-7 October 2013 Management Plan Cochise, Graham, Pima, Pinal, and Santa Cruz Counties, Arizona, and Hidalgo County, New Mexico The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TTY). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Front cover photos (clockwise from upper left): Meadow Valley in the Huachuca Ecosystem Management Area; saguaros in the Galiuro Mountains; deer herd; aspen on Mt. Lemmon; Riggs Lake; Dragoon Mountains; Santa Rita Mountains “sky island”; San Rafael grasslands; historic building in Cave Creek Canyon; golden columbine flowers; and camping at Rose Canyon Campground. Printed on recycled paper • October 2013 Draft Land and Resource Management Plan Coronado National Forest Cochise, Graham, Pima, Pinal, and Santa Cruz Counties, Arizona Hidalgo County, New Mexico Responsible Official: Regional Forester Southwestern Region 333 Broadway Boulevard, SE Albuquerque, NM 87102 (505) 842-3292 For Information Contact: Forest Planner Coronado National Forest 300 West Congress, FB 42 Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 388-8300 TTY 711 [email protected] Contents Chapter 1. -
Experimental Facilities in Latin America
CLASHEP 2019, Villa General Belgrano, Córdoba, Argentina Experimental Facilities in Latin America Claudio O. Dib Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María, Valparaíso, Chile 7 to 5 Content: • Brief introduction to Particle Physics experiments. • Accelerator Facilities in L.A. • Astronomical Observatories in L.A. (current and future) - VLT, ALMA, DSA3, DES, LSST, GMT, ELT, LLAMA. • Current Astroparticle Facilities in L.A. - Auger - Parenthesis on Cosmic Rays and Extensive Air Showers. - LAGO, HAWC • Future Astroparticle Facilities in L.A. - CTA, ALPACA, LATTES, SGSO, ANDES • Summary 6 to 5 Particle Physics experiments: - Table top experiments E. Rutherford’s lab., Cambridge U. - Cosmic ray detection (Astroparticle Physics) - Accelerators and colliders: (cyclotrons, synchrotrons, linacs; fixed target collisions, colliding beams) 5 to 5 Past table-top experiments 1895: J.J Thomson -> electron J.J. Thomson. Credit: Cambridge U., Cavendish Lab. 1911: E. Rutherford -> nucleus & proton 1932: J. Chadwick -> neutron 4 to 5 J.A. Ratcliffe & E. Rutherford, Cavendish Lab. Cosmic ray experiments • Cosmic rays: radiation that comes from outer space. • Discovered in 1912 by Victor Hess: – Went up a Balloon up to 5300 m: Radiation is higher further above. • Named cosmic rays by R. A. Millikan. Victor F. Hess preparing the baloon flight Cosmic rays are actually… particles! (mainly protons & heavier nuclei) 3 to 5 Robert A. Millikan. Caltech archives. Cosmic ray experiments 1932: C. Anderson discovers the positron. 1947: C. Powell, G. Occhialini, C. Lattes -
236 Pinaleño Mountains in the Twentieth Century Atalanta Hoyt
Pinaleño Mountains in the Twentieth Century Atalanta Hoyt Throughout the twentieth century, a few major events dominated the history of the Forest Service. First, the founding of the National Forest Service in 1905 replaced the Bureau of Forestry and led to the creation of modern National Forests. The new service was created under the jurisdiction of the Department of Agriculture with the purpose of securing a long term supply of timber for the American people.1 Second, the great depression of the 1930s, Franklin Roosevelt’s creation of the Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) and the expansion of the Forest Service changed the shape of National Forests.2 This time period featured a major transition from timber management to hands on putting resources into the forest. The Forest Service and CCC planted trees, carved trails, built roads, and conducted research; actively molding forests and applying the latest forestry techniques instead of letting the forest take its course.3 A third period of great change came in the 1970s during the environmental era.4 The emphasis changed from conceptualizing the forests as resources to be converted into marketable goods to seeing them as wilderness in need of preservation. While conservation has always been an important part of the Forest Service - advocated by both those who saw an intrinsic value in wilderness and by those who used the wilderness for recreational purposes - increased urbanization highlighted the uniqueness of forests. Efforts to catalog and protect the environments of forests became a main priority while ecologists and conservationists gained status.5 These three main shifts defined the Forest Service in the twentieth century.