DOCSLIB.ORG

Election by Lot and the Democratic Diarchy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Election by Lot and the Democratic Diarchy Election by Lot and the Democratic Diarchy Submitted by John Keith Bell Sutherland to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Politics (PT) in September 2017 This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and no material has been previously submitted and approved for the award of degree by this or any other University. Signature . 1 Abstract This thesis argues that ‘democracy’ can better be understood in terms of a conceptual diarchy of ‘isonomia’ (equal political rights) and ‘isegoria’ (equal speech rights), rather than the conventional diarchy of ‘will’ and ‘opinion’ that originated in the era of absolute monarchy. As the proposed diarchy has its origin in classical Greece, the thesis starts with a brief overview of the institutional changes in sixth-, fifth- and fourth-century Athenian democracy that implemented the distinction in different ways, and examines some of its dysfunctions. The particular aspect of Athenian democracy under focus is sortition – the random selection of citizens for public office – viewed in antiquity as democratic, whereas election was viewed as an aristocratic or oligarchic selection mechanism. The thesis takes issue with Bernard Manin’s claim that the ‘triumph of election’ was on account of the natural right theory of consent, arguing that sortition-based proxy representation is a better way of indicating (hypothetical) consent than preference election. The thesis then seeks to clarify the concept(s) of representation – essential to the implementation of the democratic diarchy in modern large-scale societies – and to study how the diarchy has been reincarnated in modern representative democracies, along with an examination of the pathologies thereof. Consideration is given as to what the deliberative style of assemblies selected by lot should be, alongside evaluation of the epistemic potential of cognitive diversity and the ‘wisdom of crowds’. Given the need for both isonomia and isegoria to assume a representative form in large modern states, Michael Saward’s Representative Claim is adopted as a theoretical model to extend the reach of political representation beyond elections. The thesis concludes with tentative proposals as to how the fourth-century reforms (delegation of the final lawmaking decision to randomly-selected nomothetic courts) might be used as a template for modern institutions to resolve some of the problems of mass democracy. 2 Table of Contents Tables and Figures 6 Introduction 7 I.1 The democratic diarchy 15 I.1.1 A note on style 17 I.2 Argumentative structure of the thesis 18 I.3 Chapter overview 18 I.4 Acknowledgements 21 1. The Democratic Diarchy 23 1.1 Structural transformations and the creation of public opinion 30 1.2 Conclusion 42 2. The Origin of the Diarchy: The Athenian Polis 45 2.1 A short note on equality of opportunity 48 2.2 Isonomia 49 2.2.1 Sixth century: The reforms of Solon 51 2.2.2 Fifth century: The reforms of Cleisthenes and Ephialtes 52 2.2.3 Fourth century reaction: The return to the patrios politeia 58 2.3 Isegoria 64 2.3.1 Sixth century: The reforms of Solon 65 2.3.2 Fifth century: The reforms of Cleisthenes, Pericles and Ephialtes 66 2.3.4 Fourth century reaction: The return to the patrios politeia 70 2.4 Conclusion 71 3. The Triumph of Election: Natural Right or Wrong? 74 3.1 The historical problem 76 3.1.1 The natural rights theory of consent 76 3.1.2 Institutional path-dependency 78 3.1.3 Geography and technology 80 3.1.4 The influence of Roman republicanism 81 3.1.5 Class interests 82 3.1.6 Religion 84 3.1.7 Meritocracy 85 3.2 The conceptual problem 87 3.3 Mansbridge revisited: perceived legitimacy 94 3.4 Conclusion 97 4. The Diarchy Reborn: The Representative Republic 101 4.1 ‘Acting for’ and ‘standing for’: two forms of representation 106 3 4.2 Advocacy and judgment: The Madisonian moment 114 4.2.1 A binary solution to the representative conundrum 117 4.2.2 Ancient remedies for a modern disease 119 4.3 Conclusion 124 5. Isonomia: The Deliberative Microcosm 125 5.1 Two Concepts of Deliberation 127 5.1.1 ‘Germanic’ isegoria-based theories 127 5.1.2 ‘Latinate’ isonomia-based deliberation 134 5.2 Advocacy - vs – Judgment 144 5.2.1 Speech Acts and their Measurement 145 5.3 The ongoing need for election 153 5.4 Conclusion 156 6. Epistemic Democracy and the Wisdom of Crowds 159 6.1 The counting approach: Condorcet’s jury theorem and the ‘wisdom of crowds’ 167 6.2 The talking approach: Cognitive diversity and democratic reason 173 6.2.1 Exchanging reasons – vs – weighing reasons 180 6.2.2 Cognitive diversity – vs – the wisdom of crowds 187 6.2.3 Authority, legitimacy and consent 192 6.3 The exception that proves the rule? 194 7. Isegoria: The Representative Claim 196 7.1 Numerical (arithmetic) and proportional (geometric) equality 198 7.2 The ‘Representative Claim’ 206 7.3 Pnyx: Representative isegoria in formal political institutions 210 7.3.1 Electoral representation 210 7.3.2 Pressure groups and single-issue advocates 217 7.3.2.1 New political parties 217 7.3.2.2 Single-issue advocates 219 7.3.3 Representation of ‘all affected interests’, non-human life, the environment and future generations 220 7.3.3.1 The environment, non-human animals and future generations 222 7.3.3.2 Rights, duties and constitutional safeguards 227 7.3.4 Direct-democratic initiatives 229 7.4 Agora: The informal public sphere 231 7.4.1 The ‘Fourth Estate’ 231 7.4.1.1 UK media – competitive and marginally profitable 233 7.4.1.2 American [and Italian] exceptionalism? 241 7.4.1.3 Public media 245 7.4.2 Randomly-selected demarchic committees and agenda panels 249 4 7.4.3 Deliberative, discursive and associational democracy 253 7.4.3.1 Deliberative democracy 253 7.4.3.2 Discursive democracy 254 7.4.3.3 Associational democracy 257 7.5 Reception and evaluation of representative claims 260 7.5.1 Justification of anti-democratic practice 262 7.6 Conclusion 266 8. From Theory to Praxis 271 8.1 Sortition as an alternative way of selecting political representatives 272 8.2 Advisory bodies 275 8.3 Polyarchy III 276 8.3.1 Representative isegoria (agenda setting) 277 8.3.2 Representative isonomia (judgment) 280 8.3.2.1 Advocacy (for and against the legislative proposal) 284 8.3.3 Parliamentary committees 287 8.3.4 Constituency affairs 288 8.3.5 Accountability, consistency, fiscal responsibility and executive governance 289 8.3.5.1 Elected (aristocratic) executive governance 290 8.3.5.2 ‘Monarchical’ (appointed) governance 295 8.4 Popular sovereignty – vs - the mixed constitution 301 8.4.1 Monarchical 306 8.4.2 Aristocratic 308 8.4.2.1 The Judiciary 309 8.4.2.2 The Media 311 8.4.3 Democratic 312 Appendix I: The Brexit Lottery 313 Appendix II: The Blind Break and the Invisible Hand 317 A2.1 Overture: Sortition and social theory 317 A2.2 Sortition and political theory 319 A2.2.1 The ‘Blind Break’ 320 A2.2.2 The ‘Invisible Hand’ 322 A2.2.3 Democratic reason and the wisdom of crowds 333 A2.3 Entailments 334 A2.4 Conclusion 336 Glossary 338 Bibliography 339 5 Tables and Figures Table 2.1: The evolution of isonomia and isegoria in classical-era Athens 72 Figure 5.1: Parliamentary democracy and party democracy 126 Table 7.1: Freedoms and equalities 201 Table 8.1: Margin of error, decision threshold and sample size 283 Table 8.2: The mixed constitution 306 Figure A2.1: The Blind Break 321 Table A2.2: The Blind Break and the Invisible Hand 337 6 Introduction Since the time of the birth of representative government at the end of the eighteenth century many claims have been made regarding the ‘crisis of democracy’. Most of the jeremiads were written in the wake of an extension to the franchise, and echoed Henry Ireton’s argument at the Putney Debates (1647) that ‘no man hath a right to an interest or share in the disposing of the affairs of the kingdom . that hath not a permanent fixed interest in this kingdom’. In the UK, conservative liberals such as Henry Maine and Walter Bagehot were deeply sceptical that parliamentary government could survive Disraeli’s extension of the franchise to include the majority of working men, and the resultant shift of the effective locus of decision making from the parliamentary chamber to the electoral hustings. However the turn of the twenty-first century has witnessed unprecedented disapproval with the entire political class, and a dramatic collapse in membership of political parties, right across the developed world, leading to claims that ‘the age of party democracy has passed’ (Mair, 2013, p. 1).1 In the UK the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds now has more than twice as many members as the three main political parties combined and politicians are now even more distrusted than estate agents, bankers and journalists (MORI, 2013). As Matthew Arnold’s Dover Beach (1867) catalogued the ‘long, withdrawing roar’ of the sea of religious faith, the long-term consequence of the Reform Act of the same year was to undermine voters’ faith in, and deference to, the political establishment. This is a consequence of the paradox at the heart of representative democracy – voters expect politicians both to pander to their wishes and at the same time to exercise strong leadership, giving rise to the (probably apocryphal) remark of the nineteenth-century French socialist politician Alexandre Ledru-Rollin: ‘there go the people, I must follow them for I am their leader’.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 the Chilcot Report Some Thoughts on International Law And
    The Chilcot Report Some Thoughts on International Law and Legal Advice James A Green and Stephen Samuel+ Abstract The Report of the Iraq (Chilcot) Inquiry was finally published, 7 years after the Inquiry’s creation, on 6 July 2016. The scope of the Inquiry’s work was vast, and this was reflected in the enormous size of its final Report. The publication of the Report thus raises a multitude of questions requiring further analysis. In this short article, we aim to contribute some initial thoughts, immediately following the Report’s publication, in just two (interrelated) areas. First, we comment on the role of international law in the Chilcot Inquiry. To what extent was international law considered and how was it presented in the Report? We also ask whether the Report reaches any implicit substantive legal conclusions, despite formally refraining from determinations of law. Secondly, we review the Inquiry’s findings concerning international legal advice and legal advisers. In particular, we contribute some thoughts on the Report’s treatment of questions relating to the appropriate recipients of legal advice and its transparency, the timeliness of advice, the perception and treatment of law and legal advice by the Government, and the independence and quality of that advice. Professor of Public International Law, University of Reading. + Doctoral Candidate, University of Reading. The authors would like to thank April Longstaffe for her research assistance and the ESRC funded ‘Commissions of Inquiry: Problems and Prospects’ project based at the Human Rights and International Law Unit, University of Liverpool, for the financial support both in relation to financing April’s work for us and for funding our trip to Liverpool in January 2015 (well before the publication of the Chilcot Report in July 2016) to present a work-in-progress version of our underpinning research.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom of Information and the Royal Family
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 05377, 13 May 2015 Freedom of information By Lucinda Maer and the Royal Family Inside: 1. The scope of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 2. Prince of Wales correspondence with Government 3. Changes made to the exemption on communications with the Royal Family www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary Number 05377, 13 May 2015 2 Contents Summary 3 1. The scope of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 4 2. Prince of Wales correspondence with Government 6 3. Changes made to the exemption on communications with the Royal Family 7 3.1 Review of the 30 year rule (the Dacre Review) 7 3.2 The Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010 9 3.3 Commencement 10 Cover page image copyright: UK Parliament. 3 Freedom of information and the Royal Family Summary The Freedom of Information Act 2000 does not apply directly to the Royal Household. However it does apply to communications with members of the Royal Family held by public authorities. Under the Act, as amended in 2010, certain information relating to communications with the Sovereign and to the heir and second in line to the Throne is absolutely exempt from the Act, whereas information relating to other members of the Royal Family and the Royal Household is subject to the public interest test. Before the 2000 Act was amended in 2010 by the Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010, all of the information covered by the exemption for communications with members of the Royal Family had been subject to the public interest test.
    [Show full text]
  • Josephus As Political Philosopher: His Concept of Kingship
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2017 Josephus As Political Philosopher: His Concept Of Kingship Jacob Douglas Feeley University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, and the Jewish Studies Commons Recommended Citation Feeley, Jacob Douglas, "Josephus As Political Philosopher: His Concept Of Kingship" (2017). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2276. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2276 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2276 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Josephus As Political Philosopher: His Concept Of Kingship Abstract Scholars who have discussed Josephus’ political philosophy have largely focused on his concepts of aristokratia or theokratia. In general, they have ignored his concept of kingship. Those that have commented on it tend to dismiss Josephus as anti-monarchical and ascribe this to the biblical anti- monarchical tradition. To date, Josephus’ concept of kingship has not been treated as a significant component of his political philosophy. Through a close reading of Josephus’ longest text, the Jewish Antiquities, a historical work that provides extensive accounts of kings and kingship, I show that Josephus had a fully developed theory of monarchical government that drew on biblical and Greco- Roman models of kingship. Josephus held that ideal kingship was the responsible use of the personal power of one individual to advance the interests of the governed and maintain his and his subjects’ loyalty to Yahweh. The king relied primarily on a standard array of classical virtues to preserve social order in the kingdom, protect it from external threats, maintain his subjects’ quality of life, and provide them with a model for proper moral conduct.
    [Show full text]
  • Open PDF 132KB
    Written evidence from Dr Samantha Newbery (CHIS0009) Biography A researcher specialising in intelligence and counter-terrorism, Dr Newbery’s forthcoming book addresses the intersection of the use of informers (also known as agents and covert human intelligence sources (CHIS)) and criminality during ‘the troubles’ in Northern Ireland. The book’s themes and cases are directly relevant to this Bill. Dr Newbery’s previous research also addressed policy-making on human rights issues. Her book Interrogation, Intelligence and Security (Manchester University Press, 2015) considered legal and ethical questions raised by the UK’s use of controversial interrogation techniques for counter-terrorism and counter-insurgency since 1945, techniques that were found to be in breach of the European Convention on Human Rights. She is also co-author of Why Spy? The Art of Intelligence (Hurst, 2015) with the late Brian Stewart CMG, a former Deputy Chief of the Secret Intelligence Service. Executive Summary 1. A statutory power to authorise criminal conduct by CHIS This written evidence is in favour of efforts to establish a statutory power to authorise criminal conduct by CHIS. It is appropriate that the Bill covers all public authorities that RIPA permits to use CHIS. Authorisations should only be granted after being approved by an independent review. 2. Immunity from prosecution The ability to prosecute current and former CHIS is essential. The fact that the Bill does not grant them immunity from prosecution should be made clearer to the public, to CHIS and to the handlers to whom CHIS report, either in the Bill itself or through associated publicity.
    [Show full text]
  • Are Condorcet and Minimax Voting Systems the Best?1
    1 Are Condorcet and Minimax Voting Systems the Best?1 Richard B. Darlington Cornell University Abstract For decades, the minimax voting system was well known to experts on voting systems, but was not widely considered to be one of the best systems. But in recent years, two important experts, Nicolaus Tideman and Andrew Myers, have both recognized minimax as one of the best systems. I agree with that. This paper presents my own reasons for preferring minimax. The paper explicitly discusses about 20 systems. Comments invited. [email protected] Copyright Richard B. Darlington May be distributed free for non-commercial purposes Keywords Voting system Condorcet Minimax 1. Many thanks to Nicolaus Tideman, Andrew Myers, Sharon Weinberg, Eduardo Marchena, my wife Betsy Darlington, and my daughter Lois Darlington, all of whom contributed many valuable suggestions. 2 Table of Contents 1. Introduction and summary 3 2. The variety of voting systems 4 3. Some electoral criteria violated by minimax’s competitors 6 Monotonicity 7 Strategic voting 7 Completeness 7 Simplicity 8 Ease of voting 8 Resistance to vote-splitting and spoiling 8 Straddling 8 Condorcet consistency (CC) 8 4. Dismissing eight criteria violated by minimax 9 4.1 The absolute loser, Condorcet loser, and preference inversion criteria 9 4.2 Three anti-manipulation criteria 10 4.3 SCC/IIA 11 4.4 Multiple districts 12 5. Simulation studies on voting systems 13 5.1. Why our computer simulations use spatial models of voter behavior 13 5.2 Four computer simulations 15 5.2.1 Features and purposes of the studies 15 5.2.2 Further description of the studies 16 5.2.3 Results and discussion 18 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Single-Winner Voting Method Comparison Chart
    Single-winner Voting Method Comparison Chart This chart compares the most widely discussed voting methods for electing a single winner (and thus does not deal with multi-seat or proportional representation methods). There are countless possible evaluation criteria. The Criteria at the top of the list are those we believe are most important to U.S. voters. Plurality Two- Instant Approval4 Range5 Condorcet Borda (FPTP)1 Round Runoff methods6 Count7 Runoff2 (IRV)3 resistance to low9 medium high11 medium12 medium high14 low15 spoilers8 10 13 later-no-harm yes17 yes18 yes19 no20 no21 no22 no23 criterion16 resistance to low25 high26 high27 low28 low29 high30 low31 strategic voting24 majority-favorite yes33 yes34 yes35 no36 no37 yes38 no39 criterion32 mutual-majority no41 no42 yes43 no44 no45 yes/no 46 no47 criterion40 prospects for high49 high50 high51 medium52 low53 low54 low55 U.S. adoption48 Condorcet-loser no57 yes58 yes59 no60 no61 yes/no 62 yes63 criterion56 Condorcet- no65 no66 no67 no68 no69 yes70 no71 winner criterion64 independence of no73 no74 yes75 yes/no 76 yes/no 77 yes/no 78 no79 clones criterion72 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 monotonicity yes no no yes yes yes/no yes criterion80 prepared by FairVote: The Center for voting and Democracy (April 2009). References Austen-Smith, David, and Jeffrey Banks (1991). “Monotonicity in Electoral Systems”. American Political Science Review, Vol. 85, No. 2 (June): 531-537. Brewer, Albert P. (1993). “First- and Secon-Choice Votes in Alabama”. The Alabama Review, A Quarterly Review of Alabama History, Vol. ?? (April): ?? - ?? Burgin, Maggie (1931). The Direct Primary System in Alabama.
    [Show full text]
  • Books Added to the Collection: July 2014
    Books Added to the Collection: July 2014 - August 2016 *To search for items, please press Ctrl + F and enter the title in the search box at the top right hand corner or at the bottom of the screen. LEGEND : BK - Book; AL - Adult Library; YPL - Children Library; AV - Audiobooks; FIC - Fiction; ANF - Adult Non-Fiction; Bio - Biography/Autobiography; ER - Early Reader; CFIC - Picture Books; CC - Chapter Books; TOD - Toddlers; COO - Cookbook; JFIC - Junior Fiction; JNF - Junior Non Fiction; POE -Children's Poetry; TRA - Travel Guide Type Location Collection Call No Title AV AL ANF CD 153.3 GIL Big magic : Creative living / Elizabeth Gilbert. AV AL ANF CD 153.3 GRA Originals : How non-conformists move the world / Adam Grant. Irrationally yours : On missing socks, pick up lines, and other existential puzzles / Dan AV AL ANF CD 153.4 ARI Ariely. Think like a freak : The authors of Freakonomics offer to retrain your brain /Steven D. AV AL ANF CD 153.43 LEV Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner. AV AL ANF CD 153.8 DWE Mindset : The new psychology of success / Carol S. Dweck. The geography of genius : A search for the world's most creative places, from Ancient AV AL ANF CD 153.98 WEI Athens to Silicon Valley / Eric Weiner. AV AL ANF CD 158 BRO Rising strong / Brene Brown. AV AL ANF CD 158 DUH Smarter faster better : The secrets of prodctivity in life and business / Charles Duhigg. AV AL ANF CD 158.1 URY Getting to yes with yourself and other worthy opponents / William Ury. 10% happier : How I tamed the voice in my head, reduced stress without losing my edge, AV AL ANF CD 158.12 HAR and found self-help that actually works - a true story / Dan Harris.
    [Show full text]
  • Law, Liberty and the Rule of Law (In a Constitutional Democracy)
    Georgetown University Law Center Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW 2013 Law, Liberty and the Rule of Law (in a Constitutional Democracy) Imer Flores Georgetown Law Center, [email protected] Georgetown Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 12-161 This paper can be downloaded free of charge from: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/1115 http://ssrn.com/abstract=2156455 Imer Flores, Law, Liberty and the Rule of Law (in a Constitutional Democracy), in LAW, LIBERTY, AND THE RULE OF LAW 77-101 (Imer B. Flores & Kenneth E. Himma eds., Springer Netherlands 2013) This open-access article is brought to you by the Georgetown Law Library. Posted with permission of the author. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, Jurisprudence Commons, Legislation Commons, and the Rule of Law Commons Chapter6 Law, Liberty and the Rule of Law (in a Constitutional Democracy) lmer B. Flores Tse-Kung asked, saying "Is there one word which may serve as a rule of practice for all one's life?" K'ung1u-tzu said: "Is not reciprocity (i.e. 'shu') such a word? What you do not want done to yourself, do not ckJ to others." Confucius (2002, XV, 23, 225-226). 6.1 Introduction Taking the "rule of law" seriously implies readdressing and reassessing the claims that relate it to law and liberty, in general, and to a constitutional democracy, in particular. My argument is five-fold and has an addendum which intends to bridge the gap between Eastern and Western civilizations,
    [Show full text]
  • Majority Judgment: a New Voting Method
    Paradoxes Impossbilities Majority Judgment Theory Applications of MJ Logiciels JM Experimental Evidences Conclusion Majority Judgment: A New Voting Method Rida Laraki CNRS (Lamsade, Dauphine) and University of Liverpool Colloquium J. Morgenstern, INRIA, Sophia-Antipolis December 11, 2018 (Joint work with Michel Balinski) R. Laraki Majority Judgment: A New Voting Method Paradoxes Impossbilities Majority Judgment Theory ApplicationsMethods of MJ Logiciels of Voting JM Paradoxes Experimental in Theory Evidences Paradoxes Conclusion in Practice 1 Paradoxes Methods of Voting Paradoxes in Theory Paradoxes in Practice 2 Impossbilities May’s Axioms for Two Candidates Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem 3 Majority Judgment From Practice Small Jury Large Electorate 4 Theory Domination Paradox Possibility Manipulation 5 Applications of MJ Trump 2016 Gillets Jaunes Délé´gué CM1 6 Logiciels JM 7 Experimental Evidences 8 Conclusion R. Laraki Majority Judgment: A New Voting Method First-past-the-post: also called plurality voting, used in UK, US and Canada to elect members of house of representatives. A voter designate one candidate. The most designated wins. Two-past-the-post: used in France and several countries (Finland, Austria, Russia, Portugal, Ukraine, etc) to elect the president. A voter designates one candidate. If a candidate is designated by a majority, he is elected. Otherwise, there is a run-off between the two first candidates. Paradoxes Impossbilities Majority Judgment Theory ApplicationsMethods of MJ Logiciels of Voting JM Paradoxes Experimental in Theory Evidences Paradoxes Conclusion in Practice Voting methods most used in elections R. Laraki Majority Judgment: A New Voting Method A voter designate one candidate. The most designated wins. Two-past-the-post: used in France and several countries (Finland, Austria, Russia, Portugal, Ukraine, etc) to elect the president.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Zechariah, Volume 2
    EXPLORING ZECHARIAH, VOLUME 2 VOLUME ZECHARIAH, EXPLORING is second volume of Mark J. Boda’s two-volume set on Zechariah showcases a series of studies tracing the impact of earlier Hebrew Bible traditions on various passages and sections of the book of Zechariah, including 1:7–6:15; 1:1–6 and 7:1–8:23; and 9:1–14:21. e collection of these slightly revised previously published essays leads readers along the argument that Boda has been developing over the past decade. EXPLORING MARK J. BODA is Professor of Old Testament at McMaster Divinity College. He is the author of ten books, including e Book of Zechariah ZECHARIAH, (Eerdmans) and Haggai and Zechariah Research: A Bibliographic Survey (Deo), and editor of seventeen volumes. VOLUME 2 The Development and Role of Biblical Traditions in Zechariah Ancient Near East Monographs Monografías sobre el Antiguo Cercano Oriente Society of Biblical Literature Boda Centro de Estudios de Historia del Antiguo Oriente (UCA) Electronic open access edition (ISBN 978-0-88414-201-0) available at http://www.sbl-site.org/publications/Books_ANEmonographs.aspx Cover photo: Zev Radovan/BibleLandPictures.com Mark J. Boda Ancient Near East Monographs Monografías sobre el Antiguo Cercano Oriente Society of Biblical Literature Centro de Estudios de Historia del Antiguo Oriente (UCA) EXPLORING ZECHARIAH, VOLUME 2 ANCIENT NEAR EAST MONOGRAPHS Editors Alan Lenzi Juan Manuel Tebes Editorial Board Reinhard Achenbach C. L. Crouch Esther J. Hamori Chistopher B. Hays René Krüger Graciela Gestoso Singer Bruce Wells Number 17 EXPLORING ZECHARIAH, VOLUME 2 The Development and Role of Biblical Traditions in Zechariah by Mark J.
    [Show full text]
  • Direct and Economic Democracy in Ancient Athens and Its Significance Today
    SOCIETY & NATURE, Vol. 1, No. 1 (1992) Direct and Economic Democracy in Ancient Athens and its Significance Today TAKIS FOTOPOULOS Abstract This article examines the intrinsic relationship between direct and economic democracy as it was exemplified in the case of classical Athens. The aim is to show that the final failure of the Athenian democracy was not due, as is usually asserted, to the innate weaknesses of direct democracy but, firstly, due to the fact that it always remained partial, embracing only part of its population, and, second, that it was never completed by a corresponding economic democracy. This fact implies that any attempt today at establishing direct democracy, which is not complemented by economic democracy, is condemned to failure. During the Athenian celebrations for the 2,500th anniversary of Cleisthenes' reforms (where there appeared a ridiculous show of the elite who celebrated, by themselves, the most anti- elitist form of democracy that has ever existed!), as well as in the wider `discussion' that followed on the significance of direct democracy, no reference was made to the relationship between direct and economic democracy. As I will try to show, however, the development of the Athenian democracy amongst its citizens (that is with the slaves and women excluded) kept pace with a determined effort to diminish the socio-economic differences between the citizens. Also, the decline itself of the Athenian democracy was, in my view, directly connected with its failure to become universal, and with the contradiction created by the fact that the political equality which the Athenian democracy had established for its citizens was, in the last instance, founded on economic inequality.
    [Show full text]
  • Absolute Monarchy in Russia
    wh07_te_ch04_s05_MOD_s.fm Page 168 Monday, March 5, 2007 12:28WH07MOD_se_CH04_S05_s.fm PM Page 168 Thursday, January 25, 2007 2:45 PM The palace (left) of Catherine the Great (far left) reflects both European and traditional Russian architectural styles. Step-by-Step SECTION Instruction 5 WITNESS HISTORY AUDIO A Foreign Princess Takes the Throne Objectives For twenty years, the German princess Catherine lived As you teach this section, keep students at the Russian court, enduring an unhappy marriage to focused on the following objectives to help the Russian heir apparent, who was widely considered them answer the Section Focus Question to be insane. She filled her time reading, studying and master core content. French philosophy, building alliances behind the scenes, and biding her time. When her husband ■ Explain how Peter the Great tried to became emperor in 1762, she called on her allies to make Russia into a modern state. act. Within a few months he had been deposed and ■ Identify the steps Peter took to expand Catherine proclaimed empress of Russia. Like Peter the Russia’s borders. Great before her, Catherine would rule with intelligence, a firm hand, and a mind set on ■ Describe how Catherine the Great modernization. strengthened Russia. Focus Question How did Peter the Great and Catherine the Great strengthen Russia and expand its territory? Absolute Monarchy in Russia Prepare to Read In the early 1600s, Russia was still a medieval state, untouched by Objectives the Renaissance or Reformation and largely isolated from Western Build Background Knowledge L3 • Explain how Peter the Great tried to make Russia into a modern state.
    [Show full text]