Diagnostic approach to pulmonary embolism and lessons from a busy acute assessment unit in the UK M.M.A. Hamad1 P. Bhatia2 E. Ellidir1 The diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) can be very elusive and, if missed,mayhave 2 fatal consequences. Conversely, PE can be over-diagnosed, with the concomitant risks M.M. Abdelaziz V. Connolly1 associated with unnecessary anticoagulation. Although there are many tests that used in the diagnosis of PE, no test can exclude this condition with 100% certainty,andPEhas 1Dept of Acute Medicine, James been reported even after a negative pulmonary angiography. The diagnosis of PE Cook University Hospital, depends on the interpretation of the available tests in the context of pre-test clinical Middlesbrough, UK probabilities. Ventilation/perfusion (V9/Q9) scan and computerised tomographic 2Dept of Medicine, Tameside pulmonary angiography (CTPA) are the main screening tests used for patients with Hospital, Ashton-under-Lyne, UK suspected PE. However, both V9/Q9 scan and CTPA have to be supplemented by other diagnostic modalities because of their diagnostic limitations. This article reviews the Correspondence M.M. Abdelaziz literature concerning the diagnosis of PE, with particular reference to the approach in our Dept of Medicine acute assessment unit. We conclude by describing two learning points from real cases Tameside Hospital presenting with suspected PE, in order to highlight how the diagnosis can bemissedor Ashton-under-Lyne, OL6 9RW, UK, made inaccurately.
[email protected] Despite many diagnostic modalities, the presence or absence of an alternative diag- diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) nosis which would explain the clinical remains very challenging, and PE can be presentation.