Westermark's Sign

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Westermark's Sign Archives of Cardiovascular Disease (2009) 102, 75—76 IMAGE Westermark’s sign Le signe de Westermark Erwin Chiquete a,∗, Jorge Corona b, Carlos Guarena˜ a, Juan Gutiérrez-Manjarrez a, Carolina Torres-Anguiano a, Ernesto Landeros a, Mario Paredes-Espinosa a a Servicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital Civil de Guadalajara ‘‘Fray Antonio Alcalde’’, Hospital 278, Universidad de Guadalajara, 44280 Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico b Department of Radiology, Hospital Civil ‘‘Fray Antonio Alcalde’’, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico Received 27 May 2008; received in revised form 4 June 2008; accepted 19 June 2008 Available online 18 September 2008 A 50-year-old obese woman presented to the emergency department with a 1-day his- tory of nonproductive cough and severe pleuritic chest pain. On physical examination the KEYWORDS patient was dehydrated and dyspneic, presented bilateral fine basal crackles, dilated vari- Chest film; cose veins in both legs and tenderness on compression of the calves. Arterial blood gas CT scan; analysis showed a pH of 7.47, PaCO of 32 Torr and PaO of 77 mmHg. The electrocardio- Pulmonary embolism; 2 2 gram demonstrated profound Q waves in DIII and inversion of the T waves in DIII and from Radiology; V1 to V4. A chest radiograph showed focal oligemia (Westermark’s sign) in the left lung Tomography; (Fig. 1A). Coagulation tests revealed an increased fibrinogen concentration and a D-dimer Westermark’s sign concentration of 3.0 ␮g/ml (normal value less than 1.0 ␮g/ml). A computed tomography angiogram showed marked avascularity of the left lung field (Fig. 1B) and a large thrombus located at the left pulmonary artery bifurcation (Fig. 1C and D). MOTS CLÉS Focal avascularity of lung fields on the chest radiograph is known as Westermark’s Radiographie sign [1—3]. While it has been regarded as a good predictor of pulmonary embolism thoracique ; (PE) (specificity of 92%) [2], it has a rather low sensitivity (14%) [2], thus limiting CT scan ; its utility in determining which patients have PE. Although over 80% of patients with Embolie pulmonaire ; confirmed PE have an abnormal chest X-ray at initial evaluation [2,3], plain films Radiologie ; have been superseded by modern imaging techniques, and they have been placed as Tomographie ; a part of the basic preliminary testing. Differential diagnosis of Westermark’s sign Signe de Westermark may include cardiac and pulmonary conditions [4]. Among cardiac causes of reduced ∗ Corresponding author. Fax: +52 33 3614 1121. E-mail address: [email protected] (E. Chiquete). 1875-2136/$ — see front matter © 2008 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.acvd.2008.06.010 76 E. Chiquete et al. Figure 1. A. Chest X-ray film showing left lung oligemia (Westermark’s sign); right hilar and basal infiltrates are also evident. B. Thoracic contrasted CT scan demonstrating the extensive filling defect of the left pulmonary artery branches. C and D. Thoracic contrasted CT scan showing a large thrombus on the pulmonary artery bifurcation. filling of the pulmonary vessels are tetralogy of Fallot, References Ebstein’s anomaly, tricuspid atresia and Eisenmenger com- plex. Lung conditions that may yield false positives because [1] Westermark N. On the roentgen diagnosis of lung embolism. Acta of a hyperlucent field include pulmonary emphysema, uni- Radiol 1938;19:357—72. lateral air trapping and Swyer-James syndrome, among [2] Stein PD, Terrin ML, Hales CA, Palevsky HI, Saltzman HA, others. Technical circumstances may result in incorrect Thompson BT, et al. Clinical, laboratory, roentgenographic, and interpretation of this sign, and include an overexposed electrocardiographic findings in patients with acute pulmonary embolism and no preexisting cardiac or pulmonary disease. radiograph, a noncentered beam, an asymmetrical chest Chest 1991;100:598—603. wall and unilateral marked subcutaneous emphysema. It [3] Worsley DF, Alavi A, Aronchick JM, Chen JT, Greenspan RH, is preferable to obtain the chest film while the patient is Ravin CE. Chest radiographic findings in patients with acute standing and with a posterior—anterior well-centered beam. pulmonary embolism: observations from the PIOPED study. Radi- Furthermore, Westermark’s sign may also be present in cases ology 1993;189:133—6. of chronic or recurrent embolisms [4]; thus, in diagnosing [4] Reed JC.Chest radiology: Plain film patterns and differential acute PE, comparative films may be recommended. diagnoses. 3rd ed. St Louis, MO: Mosby year book; 1991. p. 311..
Recommended publications
  • Diagnosing Pulmonary Embolism M Riedel
    309 Postgrad Med J: first published as 10.1136/pgmj.2003.007955 on 10 June 2004. Downloaded from REVIEW Diagnosing pulmonary embolism M Riedel ............................................................................................................................... Postgrad Med J 2004;80:309–319. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2003.007955 Objective testing for pulmonary embolism is necessary, embolism have a low long term risk of subse- quent VTE.2 5–7 because clinical assessment alone is unreliable and the consequences of misdiagnosis are serious. No single test RISK FACTORS AND RISK has ideal properties (100% sensitivity and specificity, no STRATIFICATION risk, low cost). Pulmonary angiography is regarded as the The factors predisposing to VTE broadly fit Virchow’s triad of venous stasis, injury to the final arbiter but is ill suited for diagnosing a disease vein wall, and enhanced coagulability of the present in only a third of patients in whom it is suspected. blood (box 1). The identification of risk factors Some tests are good for confirmation and some for aids clinical diagnosis of VTE and guides decisions about repeat testing in borderline exclusion of embolism; others are able to do both but are cases. Primary ‘‘thrombophilic’’ abnormalities often non-diagnostic. For optimal efficiency, choice of the need to interact with acquired risk factors before initial test should be guided by clinical assessment of the thrombosis occurs; they are usually discovered after the thromboembolic event. Therefore, the likelihood of embolism and by patient characteristics that risk of VTE is best assessed by recognising the may influence test accuracy. Standardised clinical presence of known ‘‘clinical’’ risk factors. estimates can be used to give a pre-test probability to However, investigations for thrombophilic dis- orders at follow up should be considered in those assess, after appropriate objective testing, the post-test without another apparent explanation.
    [Show full text]
  • Pulmonary Embolism (Pe), Suspected Acute Algorithm
    CLINICAL PATHWAY PULMONARY EMBOLISM (PE), SUSPECTED ACUTE ALGORITHM Start · Room air pulse oximetry Inclusion Criteria: · Consider supplemental oxygen · IV access and STAT CBC and DIC screen Patient presents with · Urine β-HCG, if appropriate suspected Pulmonary · CXR (PA + lateral), EKG and call the Cardiology Embolism (PE) Fellow for Echo review · Review criteria* for urgent imaging for possible PE Exclusion Criteria based on age-specific risk factors (see green boxes) No suspected PE < 18 Patient 18 years years old age? or older *Criteria for Urgent Imaging: *Criteria for Urgent Imaging: Patients < 18 years old For patients ≥ 18 years old · Painful leg swelling or known recent diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) Please refer to the Wells Criteria · Family or personal history of DVT or PE Algorithm on page 7. · Known clotting disorder predisposing to DVT or PE · Recent or current indwelling central venous catheter · Elevated systemic estrogen (e.g., oral contraceptive pill use, pregnancy) · Recent immobility · Recent major or orthopedic surgery or trauma · Acute or chronic inflammatory condition · Obesity Does patient Is the No to meet 1 or more Yes to Yes to Wells Criteria No to ALL criteria for urgent ANY EITHER Score > 4 points BOTH criteria imaging OR is d-dimer criteria criterion OR is d-dimer criteria > 0.5ug/mL? > 0.5ug/mL? Discuss CXR findings and optimal Consider non-urgent imaging for subsequent imaging modality (e.g., CT Consider non-urgent imaging for PE, consider alternative angiogram, ventilation perfusion PE, consider
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 17 Dyspnea Sabina Braithwaite and Debra Perina
    Chapter 17 Dyspnea Sabina Braithwaite and Debra Perina ■ PERSPECTIVE Pathophysiology Dyspnea is the term applied to the sensation of breathlessness The actual mechanisms responsible for dyspnea are unknown. and the patient’s reaction to that sensation. It is an uncomfort- Normal breathing is controlled both centrally by the respira- able awareness of breathing difficulties that in the extreme tory control center in the medulla oblongata, as well as periph- manifests as “air hunger.” Dyspnea is often ill defined by erally by chemoreceptors located near the carotid bodies, and patients, who may describe the feeling as shortness of breath, mechanoreceptors in the diaphragm and skeletal muscles.3 chest tightness, or difficulty breathing. Dyspnea results Any imbalance between these sites is perceived as dyspnea. from a variety of conditions, ranging from nonurgent to life- This imbalance generally results from ventilatory demand threatening. Neither the clinical severity nor the patient’s per- being greater than capacity.4 ception correlates well with the seriousness of underlying The perception and sensation of dyspnea are believed to pathology and may be affected by emotions, behavioral and occur by one or more of the following mechanisms: increased cultural influences, and external stimuli.1,2 work of breathing, such as the increased lung resistance or The following terms may be used in the assessment of the decreased compliance that occurs with asthma or chronic dyspneic patient: obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), or increased respira- tory drive, such as results from severe hypoxemia, acidosis, or Tachypnea: A respiratory rate greater than normal. Normal rates centrally acting stimuli (toxins, central nervous system events).
    [Show full text]
  • Mayo Clinic Medical Manual This Page Intentionally Left Blank Mayo Clinic Medical Manual
    Mayo Clinic Medical Manual This page intentionally left blank Mayo Clinic Medical Manual Editors Guilherme H. M. Oliveira, M.D. Gillian C. Nesbitt, M.D. Joseph G. Murphy, M.D. MAYO CLINIC SCIENTIFIC PRESS TAYLOR & FRANCIS GROUP ISBN 0849390877 The triple-shield Mayo logo and the words MAYO, MAYO CLINIC, and MAYO CLINIC SCIENTIFIC PRESS are marks of Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. ©2006 by Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. All rights reserved. This book is protected by copyright. No part of it may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means—electronic, mechanical, photocopying, record- ing, or otherwise—without the prior written consent of the copyright holder, except for brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. Inquiries should be addressed to Scientific Publications, Plummer 10, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905. For order inquiries, contact Taylor & Francis Group, 6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite #300, Boca Raton, FL 33487. www.taylorandfrancis.com Catalog record is available from the Library of Congress. Care has been taken to confirm the accuracy of the information presented and to describe generally accepted practices. However, the authors, editors, and publisher are not responsible for errors or omissions or for any consequences from application of the information in this book and make no warranty, express or implied, with respect to the contents of the publication. This book should not be relied on apart from the advice of a qualified health care provider. The authors, editors, and publisher have exerted efforts to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accordance with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Pleural Effusion, Hypovascularity in Lung Zone (Westermark’S Sign) & Pyramid Shape Infiltrate with Peak Directed to Hilus (Hampton’S Hump)
    Author(s): Michele M. Nypaver, MD, 2011 License: Unless otherwise noted, this material is made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ We have reviewed this material in accordance with U.S. Copyright Law and have tried to maximize your ability to use, share, and adapt it. Copyright holders of content included in this material should contact [email protected] with any questions, corrections, or clarification regarding the use of content. For more information about how to cite these materials visit http://open.umich.edu/privacy-and-terms-use. Any medical information in this material is intended to inform and educate and is not a tool for self-diagnosis or a replacement for medical evaluation, advice, diagnosis or treatment by a healthcare professional. Please speak to your physician if you have questions about your medical condition. Viewer discretion is advised: Some medical content is graphic and may not be suitable for all viewers. Citation Key for more information see: http://open.umich.edu/wiki/CitationPolicy Use + Share + Adapt { Content the copyright holder, author, or law permits you to use, share and adapt. } Public Domain – Government: Works that are produced by the U.S. Government. (17 USC § 105) Public Domain – Expired: Works that are no longer protected due to an expired copyright term. Public Domain – Self Dedicated: Works that a copyright holder has dedicated to the public domain. Creative Commons – Zero Waiver Creative Commons – Attribution License Creative Commons – Attribution Share Alike License Creative Commons – Attribution Noncommercial License Creative Commons – Attribution Noncommercial Share Alike License GNU – Free Documentation License Make Your Own Assessment { Content Open.Michigan believes can be used, shared, and adapted because it is ineligible for copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Signs in Chest Imaging
    Diagn Interv Radiol 2011; 17:18–29 CHEST IMAGING © Turkish Society of Radiology 2011 PICTORIAL ESSAY Signs in chest imaging Oktay Algın, Gökhan Gökalp, Uğur Topal ABSTRACT adiological practice includes classification of illnesses with similar A radiological sign can sometimes resemble a particular object characteristics through recognizable signs. Knowledge of and abil- or pattern and is often highly suggestive of a group of similar pathologies. Awareness of such similarities can shorten the dif- R ity to recognize these signs can aid the physician in shortening ferential diagnosis list. Many such signs have been described the differential diagnosis list and deciding on the ultimate diagnosis for for X-ray and computed tomography (CT) images. In this ar- ticle, we present the most frequently encountered plain film a patient. In this report, 23 important and frequently seen radiological and CT signs in chest imaging. These signs include for plain signs are presented and described using chest X-rays, computed tomog- films the air bronchogram sign, silhouette sign, deep sulcus raphy (CT) images, illustrations and photographs. sign, Continuous diaphragm sign, air crescent (“meniscus”) sign, Golden S sign, cervicothoracic sign, Luftsichel sign, scim- itar sign, doughnut sign, Hampton hump sign, Westermark Plain films sign, and juxtaphrenic peak sign, and for CT the gloved finger Air bronchogram sign sign, CT halo sign, signet ring sign, comet tail sign, CT an- giogram sign, crazy paving pattern, tree-in-bud sign, feeding Bronchi, which are not normally seen, become visible as a result of vessel sign, split pleura sign, and reversed halo sign. opacification of the lung parenchyma.
    [Show full text]
  • Eponyms in Radiologic Signs
    Eponyms in radiologic signs Poster No.: C-0133 Congress: ECR 2014 Type: Educational Exhibit Authors: D. Andrade, L. Andrade, M. Magalhaes, L. Curvo-Semedo, F. Caseiro Alves; Coimbra/PT Keywords: Diagnostic procedure, Fluoroscopy, CT, Conventional radiography, Thorax, Musculoskeletal system, Gastrointestinal tract, Education and training DOI: 10.1594/ecr2014/C-0133 Any information contained in this pdf file is automatically generated from digital material submitted to EPOS by third parties in the form of scientific presentations. References to any names, marks, products, or services of third parties or hypertext links to third- party sites or information are provided solely as a convenience to you and do not in any way constitute or imply ECR's endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation of the third party, information, product or service. ECR is not responsible for the content of these pages and does not make any representations regarding the content or accuracy of material in this file. As per copyright regulations, any unauthorised use of the material or parts thereof as well as commercial reproduction or multiple distribution by any traditional or electronically based reproduction/publication method ist strictly prohibited. You agree to defend, indemnify, and hold ECR harmless from and against any and all claims, damages, costs, and expenses, including attorneys' fees, arising from or related to your use of these pages. Please note: Links to movies, ppt slideshows and any other multimedia files are not available in the pdf version of presentations. www.myESR.org Page 1 of 43 Learning objectives 1. To recognize the most frequent and important radiologic signs that are eponyms.
    [Show full text]
  • Case 1 Pt Is a 45 Yo Female Who Presents with a “Run Down Feeling” After Returning from a Trip to India
    Case 1 Pt is a 45 yo female who presents with a “run down feeling” after returning from a trip to India. When talking with the patient you learn that she just hasn’t been able to perform the activities she normally could without having to rest. For example, a few weeks ago she was able to work on her house for approximately 12 hrs per day, but recently she is exhausted after a few hours of activity. The patient is not aware of an “exact” moment that the symptoms started, but noted it has not changed in intensity over the past two weeks. Activity worsens the feeling; rest improves her symptoms. The patient also complains of chest pain with deep breathing. Pt denies cough, wheezing, feelings of palpitations, hiccoughs, episodes of seizures or syncope. What things could be causing her problems? This is a patient who has decreased exercise capacity that came on fairly quickly. Things that could be causing this could involve decreased oxygenation of the blood or decreased pumping of well oxygenated blood. Additionally, build up of toxins, that should be cleared by the liver or kidney, can make people feel crummy. The list is very broad still, pneumonia, congestive heart failure (CHF), acute anemia, pericarditis, pulmonary embolism (PE), acute renal failure (ARF) viral illness, etc. What review of systems would you like to know? Any fever, change in weight, rash or jaundice, dizziness, cough, shortness of breath (SOB), wheezing, palpitations, new edema, abdominal pain, nausea/vomiting, GERD (gastroesophageal reflux disease) symptoms, BRBPR (bright red blood per rectum), melena, episodes of seizures or syncope, any signs of depression (SIG E CAPS- sleep, interests, guilt, energy, concentration/memory, affect/appetite, psychomotor changes, suicidal/sexuality/somatic symptoms) The patient says no to most of your questions, except his left lower leg seems larger than his right.
    [Show full text]
  • Pulmonary Embolism : Dr SC Coka
    PULMONARYPULMONARY EMBOLISMEMBOLISM --EDHEDH-- SEPTEMBERSEPTEMBER 20072007 DRDR SS CC COKACOKA CASECASE PRESENTATIONPRESENTATION Mrs.Mrs. N.N. MkhizeMkhize 5151 yryr oldold presentedpresented with:with: -- ShortnessShortness ofof breathbreath forfor oneone daysdays durationduration RiskRisk factors:factors: -- RaisedRaised BMIBMI -- StrongStrong familyfamily hxhx ofof MIMI-- fatherfather andand sistersister bothboth dieddied ofof MIMI inin theirtheir 5050’’ss NoNo otherother traditionaltraditional riskrisk factorsfactors OnOn EnquiryEnquiry:: -- GradeGrade 33 dyspnoeadyspnoea (NYHAC)(NYHAC) associatedassociated chestchest painpain underunder leftleft breastbreast radiatingradiating toto thethe backback describeddescribed asas stabbingstabbing inin naturenature NoNo nausea,nausea, vomittingvomitting nornor sweating.sweating. painpain waswas ofof suddensudden onsetonset atat restrest notnot relatedrelated toto mealsmeals nono identifiableidentifiable relievingrelieving nornor exacerbatingexacerbating factorsfactors --NoNo historyhistory ofof orthopnea/orthopnea/ PND/pedalPND/pedal oedemaoedema --NoNo historyhistory ofof coughcough nornor haempotysishaempotysis PMHPMH:: NoneNone ofof notenote PSH:PSH: varicosevaricose veinvein strippingstripping inin leftleft legleg inin 19931993 PreviousPrevious C/SC/S inin 19851985 SHSH:: SheShe isis ofof sobersober habitshabits FH:FH: FatherFather dieddied ofof MIMI atat ageage 56,56, sistersister alsoalso dieddied ofof MIMI atat ageage 5454 andand brotherbrother hashas unstableunstable anginaangina
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical and Imaging Profiles of Pulmonary Embolism: a Single
    Dandan et al. International Journal of Emergency Medicine (2020) 13:47 International Journal of https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-020-00303-y Emergency Medicine ORIGINAL RESEARCH Open Access Clinical and imaging profiles of pulmonary embolism: a single-institution experience Omran Al Dandan1† , Ali Hassan1*† , Hossain AbuAlola1 , Alaa Alzaki2 , Abrar Alwaheed2 , Mohannad Alalwan2, Malak Al Shammari3 , Nouf AlShamlan3 and Hind S. Alsaif1 Abstract Background: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common life-threatening condition with non-specific clinical presentations. The diagnosis of PE depends highly on imaging studies, which may also provide prognostic information. This study aimed to describe the clinical and imaging profiles of patients with PE, emphasizing the differences between central and peripheral PE. Methods: After ethics review board approval, this retrospective observational study examined the non-negative results in adult patients who underwent computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CT-PA) at our hospital between May 2016 and December 2019. Demographic and clinical information and imaging findings were collected from the electronic medical records. Results: The study included 85 cases that were identified after re-interpreting the 103 non-negative CT-PA scans. Six cases were excluded for incomplete data and 12 cases were false-positive. Central PE was found in 63.5% of the cases. Obesity was the most common risk factor seen in 37.6% of the cases. Furthermore, 9.4% of the patients had sickle cell disease, which tended to be associated with peripheral PE. There was no difference between the peripheral and central PE in most clinical and imaging parameters evaluated (P > 0.05). However, patients with isolated subsegmental PE were more likely to develop hemoptysis (P = 0.04).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 105 Peripheral Nerve Disorders E
    Chapter 105 Peripheral Nerve Disorders E. Bradshaw Bunney and E. John Gallagher ■ PERSPECTIVE oped countries, its annual incidence is just over 1 to 2 cases per 100,000 population.1 In contrast to the low incidence of Background acute peripheral neuropathies, several of which are associated The nervous system is traditionally divided into central with short-term mortality, the vast majority of peripheral nervous system (CNS) and peripheral nervous system (PNS) neuropathies seen in the emergency department (ED) are components. The PNS can be further subdivided into 12 subacute or chronic and are associated not with mortality but cranial and 31 spinal nerves. Disorders of the cranial nerves with long-term morbidity. are discussed in Chapter 103. Because diseases of the neuro- Current estimates suggest that about 1.5% of the U.S. popu- muscular junction and the myopathies are located distal to the lation suffers from peripheral neuropathy.2 Over 7% of the neuron itself, they are also considered separately in Chapter population has diabetes mellitus, with a prevalence rate of 104. Radiculopathies, which are disorders of the roots of the 20% in individuals older than 60 years. Roughly 50% of these PNS, are so commonly associated with musculoskeletal neck individuals have peripheral neuropathy.3 and back pain that they are mentioned only briefly here and are discussed in detail in Chapter 51. The simplest approach to diseases of the PNS parallels the CNS model of separating focal from nonfocal disease. In the ■ PRINCIPLES OF DISEASE PNS, the first broad category is the focal group, which can be Anatomy divided into those with evidence of single versus multiple lesions of peripheral nerves, known respectively as simple The spinal component of the PNS is shown schematically in mononeuropathies and multiple mononeuropathies (or mononeurop- Figure 105-2.
    [Show full text]
  • Diagnostic Approach to Pulmonary Embolism and Lessons from a Busy Acute Assessment Unit in the UK M.M.A
    Diagnostic approach to pulmonary embolism and lessons from a busy acute assessment unit in the UK M.M.A. Hamad1 P. Bhatia2 E. Ellidir1 The diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) can be very elusive and, if missed,mayhave 2 fatal consequences. Conversely, PE can be over-diagnosed, with the concomitant risks M.M. Abdelaziz V. Connolly1 associated with unnecessary anticoagulation. Although there are many tests that used in the diagnosis of PE, no test can exclude this condition with 100% certainty,andPEhas 1Dept of Acute Medicine, James been reported even after a negative pulmonary angiography. The diagnosis of PE Cook University Hospital, depends on the interpretation of the available tests in the context of pre-test clinical Middlesbrough, UK probabilities. Ventilation/perfusion (V9/Q9) scan and computerised tomographic 2Dept of Medicine, Tameside pulmonary angiography (CTPA) are the main screening tests used for patients with Hospital, Ashton-under-Lyne, UK suspected PE. However, both V9/Q9 scan and CTPA have to be supplemented by other diagnostic modalities because of their diagnostic limitations. This article reviews the Correspondence M.M. Abdelaziz literature concerning the diagnosis of PE, with particular reference to the approach in our Dept of Medicine acute assessment unit. We conclude by describing two learning points from real cases Tameside Hospital presenting with suspected PE, in order to highlight how the diagnosis can bemissedor Ashton-under-Lyne, OL6 9RW, UK, made inaccurately. [email protected] Despite many diagnostic modalities, the presence or absence of an alternative diag- diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) nosis which would explain the clinical remains very challenging, and PE can be presentation.
    [Show full text]