AK2117-M1-2-001-Jpeg.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

AK2117-M1-2-001-Jpeg.Pdf STATEMENT OF NGANANI ENOS JOHN MABUZA 1. I am chief minister of KaNgwane and president of the Inyandza National Movement. The Inyandza National Movement is a political grouping which functions in KaNgwane. It has over two hundred thousand paid up members and recently won fify two out of fifty seven seats in the KaNgwane Legislative Assembly. The Inyandza National Movement also has a youth section known as the Inyandza Youth Congress which has approximately thirty thousand members. These are in addition to the two hundred thousand paid up members to whom I have referred. The Inyandza Movement is a totally non ethnic movement open to all people with the rights to vote in KaNgwane. Approximately half the voters of KaNgwane are classified as Swazis. My movement is opposed to ethnicity as a basis for exercising political rights within South Africa and considers it to be divisive and an attempt by the government to weaken black opposition to its policies. My movement stands for a united South Africa in which the entire population regardless of race, colour or creed, should be entitled to universal franchise. It believes in the dismantling of the homelands and the destruction of apartheid. Although I am the Chief Minister of KaNgwane, the designated homeland of Swazi speaking South Africans, my constituency and I are not willing participants in the system. We reject the homeland policy and we are committed to the creation of a truly democratic society in South Africa. In my view this reflects the attitude of the majority of Black people who see the homeland policy as a peversion of the principal of democracy. The South African Government does not represent the majority of the population of the country and for that reason cannot claim political ligitimacy. 2 . My perception of the UDF, and I believe the perception within my constituency, is that it is a broad based and widely supported movement with considerable support within the Black community. It has a big constituency and is widely respected within KaNgwane. I myself have had discussions with leaders of the UDF and there has been no conflict whatever between my organisation and the UDF within KaNgwane. That does not mean that we necessarily agree upon all issues. For instance, it is a fundamental principle of UDF policy that there should be no participation in Government created structures. Page 2 We understand that attitude but have chosen to take a different path. For tactical reasons we have participated within the Government structures and have done so deliberately in order to frustrate the Government's attempts to turn KaNgwane into an independant homeland and denationalise the people who live there. Whilst the UDF does necessarily agree with our tactics they have shown an understanding for them. 3 . I am aware of the UDF's declaration and from my discussions with its leaders and my readings I have a general idea of its policy. The UDF's declaration addresses issues which are of fundamental importance to Black aspirations. Those issues are not the preserve of the UDF. They are shared by very many Black leaders and organisations. The UDF is an extremely important organisation in the anti apartheid camp and its leaders are respected leaders of the Black communi tee. What they say is no different to what many other people have said both before and since the founding of the UDF including myself and my party. The names of Mr. Molefe and Mr. Lekoto are known to me and I know of them to be respected leaders within the Black community. I also know of Mr. Tom Mantata who is also seen as a respected leader within the Black community. I had not heard the names of the other accused persons prior to being asked to give evidence in this case. 4 . The UDF is perceived within my constituency as a progressive organisation with an important role to play in bringing about political change. I believe that its leaders have a crucial role to play in bringing about peaceful change within our country and that the government should be talking to them instead of prosecuting them. They are an essential ingredient to the process of peaceful change that the majority of South Africans would like to see. They are of great value to our people and to the country outside of gaol. It will be extremely difficult to promote reconciliation within our country without the cooperation and active participation of such people. I consider it to be extremely harmful to the process of peaceful change and reconciliation to imprison such persons instead of talking to them. Sending them to gaol will prolong and delay the process of reconciliation and exacerbate the problems of the country. Page 3 5 . I personally regard the ANC as an important political organisation and an essential component of any attempts to resolve conflict within South Africa. I do not agree with its strategy of the armed struggle and I have made this clear both in my discussions with ANC leaders whom I have met, and in my public statements. My experience within my own constituency is that people living there do not approve of mines which explode and endanger lives. This notwithstanding, there is tremendous sympathy for the ANC and its cadres. They are generally regarded within my constituency as freedom fighters and not as terrorists. Deep down, people believe them to be heroes. And people who have risked their own safety in order to bring liberation to their people. In discussing violence and its causes one must not lose sight of the State violence against Black people. The apartheid policy is at the centre of such violence. It is imposed upon the Black people against their will and only a Black person living in a ghetto or in a bantustan can understand the extent and impact of such violence. People who have been forcibly removed from their areas of residence and dumped without chance of a job in a remote bantustan without proper facilities. People living in Black ghettos without adequate social or physical infra structure. People having to commute long distances to work and to leave their families behind them. People suffering under the influx control laws which made criminals of people seeking work. People hurt by the Group Areas Act. And generally who have been harmed by the multitude of discriminatory laws which exist within South Africa. At the heart of it all is a Population Registration Act which classifies people and predetermines their future according to such classification. White people who are insulated from what is happening within the Black communities do not perceive or understand the extent of the anger and suffering which have been provoked by these policies. In my view apartheid is a recipy for violence. Separation polarises people and gives rise to conflict particularly where the separation is identified with haves and have nots. It is inevitable in the history of the struggle for liberation that people will have turned to violence when all else fails. This is the perception of the Black community and the reason why Blacks perceive the ANC her people as freedom fighters and not as terrorists, particularly since June 1976 thousands of young people have left the country to join the armed struggle. Page 4 In my own speeches, whilst I have indicated my own opposition to the armed struggle, I have also said that I am not willing to accuse them for the decision that they have taken because I believe that they have acted in accordance with their convictions that nothing but the armed struggle will bring about change in this country. 6 . I have attended meetings of the youth within my own constituency. The youth sing freedom songs. These songs are part of the Black culture and reflect their yearning for liberation. At the youth congress meetings young people sing about Mandela and Tambo. I cannot and would stop them from doing this. Mandela is a national leader and a national hero. He is the embodiment of Black aspirations. Our youth regard him and the leaders of the ANC as leaders of the people and not simply as leaders of the ANC itself. If I attempted to stop them I would be trying to do the impossible. Although violent language sometimes is used in the songs that is fantasy and not reality. The people who sing it have not intention of taking up arms against the Government nor have they done so. 7 . In my view the Government's refusal to negotiate with the ANC has prolonged and will continue to prolong the conflict within our country. No credible leader within the Black community can negotiate with the government in the absence of the exiles and imprisoned leaders. I certainly will not negotiate with the Government behind the backs of these leaders. What is needed is a practical demonstration of a commitment to peaceful negotiations including the ANC. I believe that the violence will not stop for as long as the Government excludes the ANC from negotiations. Indeed fewer and fewer Black leaders are willing to talk to the Government. Recently I was one of only two Chief Ministers who would speak to Mr. Heunis about constitutional changes. The others declined to do so. Although I have shown a willingness to talk to the South African Government I do not agree with apartheid. I am totally opposed to it and to the institutionalised violence which keeps it in place. I believe that if the Government made a clear commitment to abolish apartheid and was willing to unban the ANC and involve it in a political process in South Africa, the violence would stop.
Recommended publications
  • Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report: Volume 2
    VOLUME TWO Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report The report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission was presented to President Nelson Mandela on 29 October 1998. Archbishop Desmond Tutu Ms Hlengiwe Mkhize Chairperson Dr Alex Boraine Mr Dumisa Ntsebeza Vice-Chairperson Ms Mary Burton Dr Wendy Orr Revd Bongani Finca Adv Denzil Potgieter Ms Sisi Khampepe Dr Fazel Randera Mr Richard Lyster Ms Yasmin Sooka Mr Wynand Malan* Ms Glenda Wildschut Dr Khoza Mgojo * Subject to minority position. See volume 5. Chief Executive Officer: Dr Biki Minyuku I CONTENTS Chapter 1 Chapter 6 National Overview .......................................... 1 Special Investigation The Death of President Samora Machel ................................................ 488 Chapter 2 The State outside Special Investigation South Africa (1960-1990).......................... 42 Helderberg Crash ........................................... 497 Special Investigation Chemical and Biological Warfare........ 504 Chapter 3 The State inside South Africa (1960-1990).......................... 165 Special Investigation Appendix: State Security Forces: Directory Secret State Funding................................... 518 of Organisations and Structures........................ 313 Special Investigation Exhumations....................................................... 537 Chapter 4 The Liberation Movements from 1960 to 1990 ..................................................... 325 Special Investigation Appendix: Organisational structures and The Mandela United
    [Show full text]
  • Swaziland's Proposed Land Deal with South Africa - the Case of Ingwavuma and Kangwane*
    Swaziland's Proposed Land Deal with South Africa - The Case of Ingwavuma and Kangwane* By Wolfgang Senftleben Since the Gambia united with Senegal under a Confederation recently, Swaziland (with an area of 17 363 sq.km) has been the smallest country in mainland Africa' (followed by Dj ibouti with 21 783 sq.km), but this could change very soon. In mid-1982 it was announced that the Republic of South Africa is willing to transfer two of its land areas totalling approximately 10 000 sq.km to the Kingdom of Swaziland. Together, these two areas would increase Swaziland's size by more than 60 per cent and give the hitherto land-locked state2 access to the sea with a potential port at Kosi Bay, just below Mozambique. The principal benefits for both countries are only too obvious: For Swaziland it means a realization of a long-standing dream of the late King Sobhuza II to incorporate all lands of the traditionally Swazi realm, besides ending Swaziland's status as a land-locked state. For South Africa it would be a major success of her apartheid policy (or territorial separation) by excommunicating two of its African tribaI areas with a population of together 850 000 people, which would give South Africa a tacit quasi-re­ cognition of her homeland policy, besides the advantage of creating a buffer zone between white-ruled South Africa and Marxist-orientated Mozambique for security reasons. However, such land transactions are carried out at the expenses of the local population in the respective areas of Ingwavuma and KaNgwane.
    [Show full text]
  • Participatory Research and Democratic Agrarian Transformation: the Case of the Eastern Transvaal Central Low Veld
    The African e-Journals Project has digitized full text of articles of eleven social science and humanities journals. This item is from the digital archive maintained by Michigan State University Library. Find more at: http://digital.lib.msu.edu/projects/africanjournals/ Available through a partnership with Scroll down to read the article. ARTICLE PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH AND DEMOCRATIC AGRARIAN TRANSFORMATION: THE CASE OF THE EASTERN TRANSVAAL CENTRAL LOW VELD Richard Levin1 Introduction Land and agrarian policy formulation in South Africa today is taking place in top-down fashion, without any serious attempt being made to involve rural people in the process. As the country enters a transition to democracy, various conceptions and practices of development are being debated. The World Bank and legions of international experts are rushing into the country to assist in the search for policy solutions to the problems of apartheid. While the 'lessons from elsewhere' are being paraded through conference centres throughout the country, little attention has been given to a critique of traditional developmentalism which has perpetuated inequality through its emphasis on market-oriented, technology- based, resource intensive and undemocratic development strategies (Harris et al, 1994). Nowhere is this more evident than on the terrain of land and agrarian reform, where groups of foreign and local experts periodically gather to deter- mine the fate of apartheid's greatest victims. Bold national land reform and rural restructuring programmes are being carved out with scant attention being paid to local detail and regional variation while the crucial question of articulation of scale between local, regional and national policy concerns is largely overlooked.
    [Show full text]
  • Committed to Unity
    Committed to Unity: South Africa’s Adherence to Its 1994 Political Settlement Paul Graham IPS Paper 6 Abstract This paper reviews the commitment of the remaining power contenders and other political actors to the settlement which was reached between 1993 and 1996. Based on interviews with three key actors now in opposing political parties represented in the National Assembly, the paper makes the case for a continued commitment to, and consensus on, the ideals and principles of the 1996 Constitution. It provides evidence of schisms in the dominant power contender (the African National Congress) which have not led to a return in political violence post-settlement. The paper makes the point that, while some of this was the result of President Nelson Mandela’s presence, more must be ascribed to the constitutional arrangements and commitments of the primary political actors and the citizens of South Africa. © Berghof Foundation Operations GmbH – CINEP/PPP 2014. All rights reserved. About the Publication This paper is one of four case study reports on South Africa produced in the course of the collaborative research project ‘Avoiding Conflict Relapse through Inclusive Political Settlements and State-building after Intra-State War’, running from February 2013 to February 2015. This project aims to examine the conditions for inclusive political settlements following protracted armed conflicts, with a specific focus on former armed power contenders turned state actors. It also aims to inform national and international practitioners and policy-makers on effective practices for enhancing participation, representation, and responsiveness in post-war state-building and governance. It is carried out in cooperation with the partner institutions CINEP/PPP (Colombia, Project Coordinators), Berghof Foundation (Germany, Project Research Coordinators), FLACSO (El Salvador), In Transformation Initiative (South Africa), Sudd Institute (South Sudan), Aceh Policy Institute (Aceh/Indonesia), and Friends for Peace (Nepal).
    [Show full text]
  • South Africa Fact Sheet
    Souher Afrc Pesecie 1/88 South Africa Fact Sheet Thirty-four million people live in South Africa today, yet only 4.9 million whites have full rights of citizenship. The Black population of 28 million has no political power and is subject to strict government controls on where to live, work, attend school, be born and be buried. This Is the apartheid system which produces enormous wealth for the white minority and grinding poverty for millions of Black South Africans. Such oppression has fueled a rising challenge to white minority rule in the 1980's through strikes, boycotts, massive demonstrations and stayaways. International pressure on the white minority government has also been growing. In response, the government has modified a few existing apartheid laws without eliminating the basic structure of apartheid. This so called reform program has done nothing to satisfy Black South Africans' demands for majority rule in a united, democratic and nonracial South Africa. Struggling to reassert control, the government has declared successive states of emergency and unleashed intensive repression, seeking to conceal its actions by a media blackout, press censorship and continuing propaganda about change. As part of its "total strategy" to preserve white power, Pretoria has also waged war against neighboring African states in an effort to end their support for the anti-apartheid struggle and undermine regional efforts to break dependence on the apartheid economy. This Fact Sheet is designed to get behind the white government's propaganda shield and present an accurate picture of apartheid's continuing impact on the lives of millions of Blacks In southern Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr Khunou Samuelson Freddie* 1. Introduction 2. Brief Historical
    International Journal of Business and Social Science Vol. 2 No. 18; October 2011 TRADITIONAL LEADERSHIP AND SELF-GOVERNING BANTUSTANS OF SOUTH AFRICA: THROUGH THE EYE OF THE NEEDLE OF CONSTITUTIONAL DEMOCRACY Dr Khunou Samuelson Freddie* 1. Introduction The aim of this article is to discuss the status, roles and legal position of the institution traditional leadership in the defunct self-governing territories of South Africa. When Verwoerd became the Prime Minister of South Africa in 1959, he introduced the Promotion of Black Self-Government Act.1 The main objective of this Act was to create self-governing territories2. The Black population was arranged and categorised into national units based on language and culture. There were the North-Sotho unit, the South-Sotho unit, the Swazi unit, the Tsonga unit, the Tswana unit, the Venda unit, the Xhosa unit and the Zulu unit.3 The administrative authorities in these national units were to be based on the tribal system. The apartheid government‟s contention was that each nation had to develop according to their own culture under their own government. The government further argued that in this process of separate development, no nation was supposed to interfere with each other.4 Unlike the states of Bophuthatswana, Transkei, Ciskei and Venda that opted for independence, the leaders of the self-governing territories had not accepted the idea of independence. These self-governing national units consisted of different and separate territories on the basis of language and culture, namely KaNgwane, Lebowa, KwaNdebele, Gazankulu, KwaZulu, and QwaQwa. The unique features and legislative peculiarities of each self-governing territory will also be identified and discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • South Africa's Black Homelands: Past Objectives, Present Realities and Future Developments
    SPECIAL STUDY/SPESIALE STUDIE TH£ SOUTH AFRICA'S BLACK HOMELANDS: PAST OBJECTIVES, PRESENT REALITIES AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS Deon Geldenhuys THE SOUTH AFRICAN INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS DIE SUID-AFRIKAANSE INSTITUUT VAN INTERNASIONALE AANGELEENTHEDE Peon Geldenhuys is Associate Professor in the Department of Political Science at the Rand Afrikaans University, Johannesburg. At the time of writing this paper he was Assistant Director, Research, at the South African Institute of International Affairs. The last section of this paper was published as "South Africa's Black Homelands: Some Alternative Political Scenarios", in Journal of Contemporary African Studies, Vol. 1, No. 1, April 1981# It should be noted that any opinions expressed in this article are the responsibility of the author and not of the Institute. SOUTH AFRICA? S BLACK HOMELANDS: PAST OBJECTIVES, PRESENT REALITIES AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS Deon Geldenhuys Contents Introduction ... page 1 I From native reserves to independent homelands: legislating for territorial separation 3 II Objectives of the homelands policy, post-1959 6 III Present realities: salient features of the independent and self-governing homelands 24 IV Future Developments 51 Conclusion 78 ISBN: 0-909239-89-4 The South African Institute of International Affairs Jan Smuts House P.O. Box 31596 BRAAMFONTEIN 2017 South Africa August 1981 Price R3-50 South Africa's Black Homelands: Past Objectives, Present Realities and Future Developments Introduction A feature of the South African political scene today is the lack of consensus on a desirable future political dispensation. This is reflected in the intensity of the debate about the Republic's political options. Local opinions cover a wide spectrum, ranging from the white 'right' to the black 'left1, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Resistance to the Cession of the Kangwane
    Sifiso Mxolisi Ndlovu Professor and Executive SOWING THE SEEDS OF Director, South African POLITICAL MOBILISATION IN Democracy Education Trust, University of BANTUSTANS: RESISTANCE South Africa. E-mail: sifisondlovu@telkomsa. TO THE CESSION OF THE net KANGWANE BANTUSTAN TO THE DOI: https://dx.doi. KINGDOM OF SWAZILAND org/10.18820/24150509/ JCH43.v1.3 ISSN 0258-2422 (Print) Abstract ISSN 2415-0509 (Online) This article on the proposed 1982 land deal between the Kingdom Journal for Contemporary of Swaziland and the South African Government to cede the History KaNgwane Bantustan and Ingwavuma to Swaziland, focuses upon 2018 43(1):43-69 the geopolitics of southern Africa and the trajectory of the struggle © UV/UFS for national liberation in South Africa, particularly on the role of the African Nationalist Congress (ANC) in Bantustan politics. By focusing specifically on the geopolitics of the liberation struggle in southern Africa, this article adds new dimensions to the work of Shireen Ally, Hugh Macmillan and other scholars, whose research on the proposed cession of the KaNgwane Bantustan focuses primarily on ethnic nationalism and ethno-nationalistic politics. Keywords: Swaziland; South African Government; African National Congress (ANC); KaNgwane Bantustan; Enos Mabuza; apartheid. Sleutelwoorde: Swaziland; Suid-Afrikaanse regering; African National Congress (ANC); KaNgwane-tuisland; Enos Mabuza; apartheid. 1. INTRODUCTION This article on the proposed 1982 land deal between the Kingdom of Swaziland and the South African Government to cede the KaNgwane Bantustan1 and Ingwavuma to Swaziland, focuses upon the geopolitics of southern Africa and the trajectory of the struggle for national liberation in South Africa, particularly the role of the African Nationalist Congress (ANC) in Bantustan politics.
    [Show full text]
  • The Implication of the Traditional Khoisan Leadership Bill of 2015
    THE IMPLICATION OF THE TRADITIONAL KHOISAN LEADERSHIP BILL OF 2015 BY CORRECTIONAL OFFICER GRADE1 – POLLSMOOR MANAGEMENT AREA Chief Dannyboy Pieterse - Robertson KHOISAN GENERALS WITH MEMBERS OF THE GORACHOUQUA COUNCIL UNDER THE LEADERSHIP OF PARAMOUNT CHIEF HENNIE VAN WYK HESSEQUA KHOI TRIBAL COUNCIL WCCC REGISTRATION: C13/1/1/1/1: NPO Number: 205-997 Tradional Khoisan leadership bill to be sign into law THE IMPLICATION OF THE TRADITIONAL KHOISAN LEADERSHIP BILL 2015 DANNYBOY. PIETERSE @VODAMAIL.CO.ZA TRADITIONAL KHOISAN LEADERSHIP BILL TO BE SIGN INTO LAW HESSEQUA KHOI TRIBAL COUNCIL – 205-997NPO THE SCOPE ABSTRACT BACKGROUND Two different groups of people Each froup had different ways and means of living The country’s first people for 2000 years Remarkable skills and knowledge They’re been assigned a slew of derogatory and sensitive names Climate change and the arrival of Europens settles lead to their sharp decline Democracy has also failed the khoisan They are recognised in the countries coat of arms but their language not Witnessing the death of a culture Khoisan Healing: Understandings, Ideas and Practices INTRODUCTORY REMARKS ON THE ETHNICAL CONDITION OF THE KHOIKHOI IN PREHISTORIC TIMES, BASED ON THE EVIDENCE OF LANGUAGE PRACTICE OF PERSPECTIVE AT CAPE OF GOOD DURING 17 CENTURY Classification of the maps Maps that ignore the presence of khoi Maps that locate their dwellings or kraals as if in a fixed position A transitional map How the Khoikhoi society was organized Political Organization The khoi – khoi Political organisation
    [Show full text]
  • Downloads/MMCP%20Book.Pdf Accessed 20 September 2019
    A South African Platinum Group Metals Exchange This publication was produced with the support of the Department of Science and Innovation (formerly the Department of Science and Technology). science & innovation Department: Science and Innovation REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA A South African Platinum Group Metals Exchange Policy Rationale for Financial Beneficiation Edited by Iraj Abedian All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without prior permission from the copyright holder. Copyright © MISTRA, 2019 ISBN 978-0-620-85956-1 Text Editor: Tracey Hawthorne Proofreader: Valda Strauss Designer: Triple M Design Set in 11/15 pt Minion Pro Printed by Hansa Print Please cite this publication as follows: MISTRA. 2019. A South African Platinum Group Metals Exchange: Policy rationale for financial beneficiation. Iraj Abedian (ed). Johannesburg: Mapungubwe Institute for Strategic Reflection. This publication was written by the following researchers: Dr Iraj Abedian (Editor) Chief Executive, Pan-African Investment and Research Services Trudi Hartzenberg Executive Director, Trade Law Centre John Stuart Research Associate, Pan-African Investment and Research Services JSE Limited Themba Moleketi Independent Researcher Njabulo Zwane Junior Researcher, Mapungubwe Institute for Strategic Reflection Neale Baartjes Director, Mineral Economics & Resources, EcoPartners (Pty) Ltd Khensane Hlongwane Independent Researcher Duduetsang Mokoele Researcher, Mapungubwe Institute for Strategic Reflection Lyndall Mujakachi Independent Researcher Contents Preface ix Acknowledgements xiii Abbreviations xv Introduction: Project background and policy context 1 1. Overview of the regional political economy of the PGM sector 27 2. Commodity exchange: A strategic industrial policy initiative 57 3. Value-chain analysis of the PGM exchange 72 4.
    [Show full text]
  • An Agricultural Law Research Article Land Reform for Post-Apartheid South Africa
    University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture [email protected] | (479) 575-7646 An Agricultural Law Research Article Land Reform for Post-Apartheid South Africa by Catherine M. Coles Originally published in BOSTON COLLEGE ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS LAW REVIEW 20 B.C. ENVTL. AFF. L. REV. 699 (1993) www.NationalAgLawCenter.org LAND REFORM FOR POST-APARTHEID SOUTH AFRICA Catherine M. Coles' I. INTRODUCTION ..... .........................•..•.....••..•..•....... 700 II. LAND SYSTEMS IN COLLISION: PRECOLONIAL AND COLONIAL LAND SYSTEMS IN SOUTH AFRICA. ......•.••.•..• •....••.................. 703 A. An Overview of Precolonial Land Systems. ..................... 703 B. Changing Rights to Land for Indigenous South African Peoples Under European Rule. .......................................... 706 III. THE INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF RACIAL INEQUALITY AND APART­ HEID THROUGH A LAND PROGRAM.................................. 711 A. Legislative Development of the Apartheid Land Program. 712 B. The Apartheid System ofRacial Zoning in Practice: Limiting the Land Rights of Black South Africans. ........................... 716 1. Homelands and National States: Limiting Black Access to Land by Restricting Citizenship. ............................. 716 2. Restricting Black Land Rights in Rural Areas Outside the Homelands through State Control. ........................... 720 3. Restricting Black Access to Urban Land..................... 721 IV. DISMANTLING APARTHEID: THE NATIONAL PARTY'S PLAN FOR LAND REFORM............. ..••.. ..•............. ..••..•.••
    [Show full text]
  • South Africa Fact Sheet
    South Africa Fact Sheet South Africa enters the 1990's at a critical crossroads of hope and danger: the government has finally bowed to popular resistance both inside the country and abroad and has taken the first steps toward creating a unified, non-racial and democratic country. It lifted the national state of emergency, unbanned political groups, released a significant number of political prisoners and entered into the first phase of talks with the African National Congress. But apartheid is far from dead. While much has changed, much more remains in place. South Africa is a society in which apartheid has created massive problems of poverty and socio-economic injustice to the point where there will be no easy solutions, whatever government comes into power. Black lives, aspirations and rights remain curtailed and controlled by legislation denying them the right to vote or own land. In addition fear, violence and repressive legislation remain integral tools of government control. There is growing evidence of a surrogate war against apartheid's opponents waged through vigilante front men who have claimed thousands of lives in what is labeled "tribal" violence. Police and army assassination squads have been publicly linked with the deaths of many activists. In 1990, hopes were raised that apartheid would soon come to an end. But an accurate picture of the extent and consequences of apartheid is vital for anyone concerned with helping the transition forward. This Fact Sheet highlights key markers for an accurate assessment of change in South Africa. Population versus Land Distribution, 1988 Land Distribution Under the Land Acts of 1913 and 1936, 87% of the 2.6% 14% country's territory was reserved for whites, 13% for Africans.
    [Show full text]