DOCSLIB.ORG

ARCL3098: the Age of Stonehenge: Mike Parker Pearson | University College London

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ARCL3098: the Age of Stonehenge: Mike Parker Pearson | University College London 09/24/21 ARCL3098: The Age of Stonehenge: Mike Parker Pearson | University College London ARCL3098: The Age of Stonehenge: Mike View Online Parker Pearson 1. Bradley, Richard. The prehistory of Britain and Ireland. vol. Cambridge world archaeology (Cambridge University Press, 2007). 2. Darvill, Timothy. Prehistoric Britain. (Routledge, 1996). 3. Parker-Pearson, M. The earlier Bronze Age. in The archaeology of Britain: an introduction from the Upper Palaeolithic to the Industrial Revolution (eds. Ralston, I. & Hunter, J.) 77–94 (Routledge, 1999). 4. Parker Pearson, Michael & Parker Pearson, Michael. Bronze Age Britain. vol. English Heritage (B.T. Batsford, 2005). 5. Parker Pearson, Michael & Stonehenge Riverside Project (England). Stonehenge: exploring the greatest stone age mystery. (Simon & Schuster, 2012). 6. Pollard, Joshua. Prehistoric Britain. vol. Blackwell studies in global archaeology (Blackwell, 1/27 09/24/21 ARCL3098: The Age of Stonehenge: Mike Parker Pearson | University College London 2008). 7. Whittle, A. The Neolithic. in The archaeology of Britain: an introduction from the Upper Palaeolithic to the Industrial Revolution 58–76 (Routledge, 1999). 8. Atkinson, R. J. C. Stonehenge. vol. A pelican book (Penquin Books in association with Hamish Hamilton, 1960). 9. Bowden, M., Soutar, S., Field, D. & Barber, M. The Stonehenge landscape. (Historic England, 2015). 10. Burl, Aubrey. Stonehenge: a new history of the world’s greatest stone circle. (Constable, 2006). 11. Chippindale, Christopher. Stonehenge complete. (Thames & Hudson, 2004). 12. Cleal, Rosamund, Walker, K. E., Montague, R. & English Heritage. Stonehenge in its landscape: twentieth-century excavations. vol. Archaeological report / English Heritage (English Heritage, 1995). 13. Darvill, Timothy. Stonehenge: the biography of a landscape. (Tempus, 2006). 2/27 09/24/21 ARCL3098: The Age of Stonehenge: Mike Parker Pearson | University College London 14. Field, D. et al. Analytical Surveys of Stonehenge and its Immediate Environs, 2009–2013: Part 1 – the Landscape and Earthworks. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 80, 1–32 (2014). 15. Field, D. et al. Analytical Surveys of Stonehenge and its Environs, 2009–2013: Part 2 – the Stones. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 81, 125–148 (2015). 16. Parker Pearson, M. Researching Stonehenge: theories past and present. Archaeology international 16, 72–83 (2013). 17. Pitts, Michael W. Hengeworld. (Century, 2000). 18. Richards, Julian C. Stonehenge: the story so far. (English Heritage, 2006). 19. Anderson-Whymark, H., Garrow, D. & Sturt, F. Microliths and maritime mobility: a continental European-style Late Mesolithic flint assemblage from the Isles of Scilly. Antiquity 89, 954–971 (2015). 20. Bradley, Richard & Edmonds, M. R. Interpreting the axe trade: production and exchange in Neolithic Britain. vol. New studies in archaeology (Cambridge University Press, 1993). 21. 3/27 09/24/21 ARCL3098: The Age of Stonehenge: Mike Parker Pearson | University College London Brophy, K. From big houses to cult houses: early Neolithic timber halls in Scotland. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 73, 1042–1052 (2007). 22. Brown, A. Dating the onset of cereal cultivation in Britain and Ireland: the evidence from charred cereal grains. Antiquity 81, 1042–1052 (2007). 23. Cleal, R. M. The dating and diversity of the earliest ceramics in Wessex and south-west England. in Monuments and material culture: papers in honour of an Avebury archaeologist: Isobel Smith 164–192 (Hobnob Press, 2004). 24. Collard, M., Edinborough, K., Shennan, S. & Thomas, M. G. Radiocarbon evidence indicates that migrants introduced farming to Britain. Journal of Archaeological Science 37, 866–870 (2010). 25. Copley, M. S. et al. Dairying in antiquity. III. Evidence from absorbed lipid residues dating to the British Neolithic. Journal of Archaeological Science 32, 523–546 (2005). 26. Darvill, Timothy & Thomas, Julian. Neolithic houses in northwest Europe and beyond. vol. Oxbow monograph (Oxbow, 1996). 27. Entwistle, R. & Grant, A. The evidence for cereal cultivation and animal husbandry in the southern British Neolithic and Bronze Age. in The beginnings of agriculture vol. Symposia of the Association for Environmental Archaeology 203–215 (B.A.R, 1989). 28. 4/27 09/24/21 ARCL3098: The Age of Stonehenge: Mike Parker Pearson | University College London Fairbairn, Andrew S. & Neolithic Studies Group. Plants in neolithic Britain and beyond. vol. Neolithic Studies Group seminar papers (Oxbow, 2000). 29. Field, David. Earthen long barrows: the earliest monuments in the British Isles. (Tempus, 2006). 30. Garrow, D. & Sturt, F. Grey waters bright with Neolithic argonauts? Maritime connections and the Mesolithic-Neolithic transitions within the ‘western seaways’ of Britain, c. 5000-3500 BC. Antiquity 85, 59–72 (2011). 31. Jacques, D. & Phillips, T. Mesolithic settlement near Stonehenge: excavations at Blick Mead, Vespasian’s Camp, Amesbury. Wiltshire archaeological and natural history magazine 107, 7–27 (2014). 32. Jones, G. & Rowley-Conwy, P. On the importance of cereal cultivation in the British Neolithic. in The origins and spread of domestic plants in southwest Asia and Europe vol. University College London Institute of Archaeology publications 391–419 (Left Coast Press, 2007). 33. Mercer, R. The origins of warfare in the British Isles. in Ancient warfare: archaeological perspectives 143–156 (Sutton, 1999). 34. Oswald, Alastair, Dyer, Carolyn, Barber, Martyn & English Heritage. The creation of monuments: neolithic causewayed enclosures in the British Isles. (English Heritage, 2001). doi:https://doi.org/10.5284/1028203. 5/27 09/24/21 ARCL3098: The Age of Stonehenge: Mike Parker Pearson | University College London 35. Richards, M. P. The early Neolithic in Britain: new insights from biomolecular archaeology. in Scotland in ancient Europe: the Neolithic and Early Bronze Age of Scotland in their European context 83–90. 36. Richards, M. P., Schulting, R. J. & Hedges, R. E. M. Archaeology: Sharp shift in diet at onset of Neolithic. Nature 425, 366–366 (2003). 37. Rowley‐Conwy, P. How the West Was Lost: A Reconsideration of Agricultural Origins in Britain, Ireland, and Southern Scandinavia. Current Anthropology 45, S83–S113 (2004). 38. Russell, Miles. Flint mines in neolithic Britain. (Tempus, 2000). 39. Sheridan, A. The Birth of Neolithic Britain: An Interpretive Account. European Journal of Archaeology 18, 720–727 (2015). 40. Schulting, R. & Wysocki, M. ‘In this chambered tumulus were found cleft skulls...’: an assessment of the evidence for cranial trauma in the British Neolithic. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 71, 107–138 (2005). 41. Sheridan, A. The Neolithization of Britain and Ireland: the ‘big picture’. in Landscapes in transition vol. Levant supplementary series 89–105 (Oxbow, 2010). 42. 6/27 09/24/21 ARCL3098: The Age of Stonehenge: Mike Parker Pearson | University College London Smith, Martin & Brickley, Megan. People of the long barrows: life, death and burial in the earlier neolithic. (History Press, 2009). 43. Thomas, J. The birth of Neolithic Britain: an interpretive account. (Oxford University Press, 2013). doi:10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199681969.001.0001. 44. Thomas, J. Beyond the economic system. in Understanding the Neolithic 7–33 (Routledge, 1999). 45. Thomas, J. Thoughts on the ‘repacked’ Neolithic revolution. Antiquity 77, 67–74 (2003). 46. Whittle, A. W. R., Cummings, Vicki & British Academy. Going over: the Mesolithic-Neolithic transition in north-west Europe. vol. Proceedings of the British Academy (Oxford University Press for the British Academy, 2007). 47. Whittle, A. et al. Building for the Dead: Events, Processes and Changing Worldviews from the Thirty-eighth to the Thirty-fourth Centuries cal. BC in Southern Britain. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 17, (2007). 48. Whittle, A. W. R., Bayliss, Alexandra & Healy, Frances. Gathering time: dating the early Neolithic enclosures of southern Britain and Ireland. (Oxbow, 2011). 49. Atkinson, R. J. C., Sandars, N. K. & Piggott, C. M. Excavations at Dorchester, Oxon: 1st report: Sites I, II, IV, V and VI ; with a chapter on henge monuments by R. J. C. Atkinson. 7/27 09/24/21 ARCL3098: The Age of Stonehenge: Mike Parker Pearson | University College London (Ashmolean Museum, 1951). 50. Harding, Jan, Barclay, Alistair & Neolithic Studies Group. Pathways and ceremonies: the cursus monuments of Britain and Ireland. vol. Seminar paper / Neolithic Studies Group (Oxbow, 1999). 51. Bradley, Richard & Society of Antiquaries of Scotland. Altering the earth: the origins of monuments in Britain and continental Europe. vol. Society of Antiquaries of Scotland monograph series (Society of Antiquaries of Scotland, 1993). 52. Bradley, Richard. The significance of monuments: on the shaping of human experience in Neolithic and Bronze Age Europe. (Routledge, 1998). 53. Brophy, K. Water coincidence? Cursus monuments and rivers. in Neolithic Orkney in its European context vol. McDonald Institute monographs 59–70 (McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, University of Cambridge, 2000). 54. Burrow, S. The formative henge: speculations drawn from the circular traditions of Wales and adjacent counties. in Round mounds and monumentality in the British Neolithic and beyond vol. Neolithic Studies Group seminar papers 182–196 (Oxbow Books, 2010). 55. Cotton, J. Two decorated Peterborough bowls from the Thames at Mortlake and their London context. in Towards a new Stone Age: aspects of the Neolithic in South-East
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Stonehenge Bibliography
    Bibliography Abbot, M. and Anderson-Whymark, H., 2012. Anon., 2011a, Discoveries provide evidence of Stonehenge Laser Scan: archaeological celestial procession at Stonehenge. On-line analysis report. English Heritage project source available at: 6457. English Heritage Research Report http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/news/latest/ Series no. 32-2012, available at: 2011/11/25Nov-Discoveries-provide- http://services.english- evidence-of-a-celestial-procession-at- herita ge.org.uk/Resea rch Repo rtsPdf s/032_ Stonehenge.aspx (accessed 2 April 2012). 2012WEB.pdf Anon., 2011b, Stonehenge’s sister? Current Alexander, C., 2009, If the stones could speak: Archaeology, 260, 6–7. Searching for the meaning of Stonehenge. Anon., 2011c, Home is where the heath is. National Geographic, 213.6 (June 2008), Late Neolithic house, Durrington Walls. 34–59. Current Archaeology, 256, 42–3. Allen, S., 2008, The quest for the earliest Anon., 2011d, Stonehenge rocks. Current published image of Stonehinge (sic). Archaeology, 254, 6–7. Wiltshire Archaeological and Natural Anon., 2012a, Origin of some of the Bluestone History Magazine, 101, 257–9. debris at Stonehenge. British Archaeology, Anon., 2006, Excavation and Fieldwork in 123, 9. Wiltshire 2004. Wiltshire Archaeological Anon., 2012b, Stonehenge: sourcing the and Natural History Magazine, 99, 264–70. Bluestones. Current Archaeology, 263, 6– Anon., 2007a, Excavation and Fieldwork in 7. Wiltshire 2005. Wiltshire Archaeological Aronson, M., 2010, If stones could speak. and Natural History Magazine, 100, 232– Unlocking the secrets of Stonehenge. 39. Washington DC: National Geographic. Anon., 2007b, Before Stonehenge: village of Avebury Archaeological and Historical wild parties. Current Archaeology, 208, Research Group (AAHRG) 2001 17–21.
    [Show full text]
  • Stonehenge OCR Spec B: History Around Us
    OCR HISTORY AROUND US Site Proposal Form Example from English Heritage The Criteria The study of the selected site must focus on the relationship between the site, other historical sources and the aspects listed in a) to n) below. It is therefore essential that centres choose a site that allows learners to use its physical features, together with other historical sources as appropriate, to understand all of the following: a) The reasons for the location of the site within its surroundings b) When and why people first created the site c) The ways in which the site has changed over time d) How the site has been used throughout its history e) The diversity of activities and people associated with the site f) The reasons for changes to the site and to the way it was used g) Significant times in the site’s past: peak activity, major developments, turning points h) The significance of specific features in the physical remains at the site i) The importance of the whole site either locally or nationally, as appropriate j) The typicality of the site based on a comparison with other similar sites k) What the site reveals about everyday life, attitudes and values in particular periods of history l) How the physical remains may prompt questions about the past and how historians frame these as valid historical enquiries m) How the physical remains can inform artistic reconstructions and other interpretations of the site n) The challenges and benefits of studying the historic environment 1 Copyright © OCR 2018 Site name: STONEHENGE Created by: ENGLISH HERITAGE LEARNING TEAM Please provide an explanation of how your site meets each of the following points and include the most appropriate visual images of your site.
    [Show full text]
  • Researching Stonehenge: Theories Past and Present
    Parker Pearson, M 2013 Researching Stonehenge: Theories Past and Present. Archaeology International, No. 16 (2012-2013): 72-83, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ai.1601 ARTICLE Researching Stonehenge: Theories Past and Present Mike Parker Pearson* Over the years archaeologists connected with the Institute of Archaeology and UCL have made substantial contributions to the study of Stonehenge, the most enigmatic of all the prehistoric stone circles in Britain. Two of the early researchers were Petrie and Childe. More recently, colleagues in UCL’s Anthropology department – Barbara Bender and Chris Tilley – have also studied and written about the monument in its landscape. Mike Parker Pearson, who joined the Institute in 2012, has been leading a 10-year-long research programme on Stonehenge and, in this paper, he outlines the history and cur- rent state of research. Petrie and Childe on Stonehenge William Flinders Petrie (Fig. 1) worked on Stonehenge between 1874 and 1880, publishing the first accurate plan of the famous stones as a young man yet to start his career in Egypt. His numbering system of the monument’s many sarsens and blue- stones is still used to this day, and his slim book, Stonehenge: Plans, Descriptions, and Theories, sets out theories and observations that were innovative and insightful. Denied the opportunity of excavating Stonehenge, Petrie had relatively little to go on in terms of excavated evidence – the previous dig- gings had yielded few prehistoric finds other than antler picks – but he suggested that four theories could be considered indi- vidually or in combination for explaining Stonehenge’s purpose: sepulchral, religious, astronomical and monumental.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham Research Online
    Durham Research Online Deposited in DRO: 17 January 2014 Version of attached le: Accepted Version Peer-review status of attached le: Peer-reviewed Citation for published item: Towers, J. and Montgomery, J. and Evans, J. and Jay, M. and Pearson, M.P. (2010) 'An investigation of the origins of cattle and aurochs deposited in the Early Bronze Age barrows at Gayhurst and Irthlingborough.', Journal of archaeological science., 37 (3). pp. 508-515. Further information on publisher's website: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2009.10.012 Publisher's copyright statement: NOTICE: this is the author's version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of archaeological science. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A denitive version was subsequently published in Journal of archaeological science, 37,3, 20 2010, 10.1016/j.jas.2009.10.012 Additional information: Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.
    [Show full text]
  • Ever Increasing Circles: the Sacred Geographies of Stonehenge and Its Landscape
    Proceedings of the British Academy, 92, 167-202 Ever Increasing Circles: The Sacred Geographies of Stonehenge and its Landscape TIMOTHY DARVILL Introduction THE GREAT STONE CIRCLE standing on the rolling chalk downland of Salisbury Plain that we know today as Stonehenge, has, in the twentieth century AD, become a potent icon for the ancient world, and the focus of power struggles and contested authority in our own. Its reputation and stature as an archaeological monument are enormous, and sometimes almost threaten to overshadow both its physical proportions and our accumu- lated collective understanding of its construction and use. While considerable attention has recently been directed to the relevance, meaning and use of the site in the twentieth century AD (Chippindale 1983; 1986a; Chippindale et al. 1990; Bender 1992), the matter of its purpose, significance, and operation during Neolithic and Bronze Age times remains obscure. The late Professor Richard Atkinson was characteristically straightforward when he said that for questions about Stonehenge which begin with the word ‘why’: ‘there is one short, simple and perfectly correct answer: We do not know’ (1979, 168). Two of the most widely recognised and enduring interpretations of Stonehenge are, first, that it was a temple of some kind; and, second, that its orientation on the midsummer sunrise gave it some sort of astronomical role in the lives of its builders. Both interpre- tations, which are not mutually exclusive, have of course been taken to absurd lengths on occasion. During the eighteenth century, for example, William Stukeley became obses- sive about the role of the Druids at Stonehenge (Stukeley 1740).
    [Show full text]
  • Secrets of the High Woods: Landscapes and Lasers
    THE NEWSLETTERAST OF THE PREHISTORIC SOCIETY P Registered Office: University College London, Institute of Archaeology, 31–34 Gordon Square, London WC1H 0PY http://www.prehistoricsociety.org/ Secrets of the High Woods: Landscapes and Lasers Introduction fieldscapes, or testified by historic cartography and ancient The South Downs National Park Authority is hosting a documents. However, many more sites have been suspected Heritage Lottery funded community archaeology project. to have been concealed below woodland – and Lidar has “Secrets of the High Woods” is exploring 305 km² of the provided the ideal tool to help explore the hidden landscapes South Downs using specially commissioned high resolution below the trees. airborne Laser scanning data – with spectacular results. Landscapes and lasers The open pasture land of the South Downs has long been Lidar captures three dimensional terrain data, and at 0.25 m recognised as one of our richest archaeological landscapes, resolution the data set is one of the largest and most detailed popular with casual visitors and academic researchers commissioned for archaeological research to date. Highly alike. However, the archaeology of the central area of the accurate models of the landscape are generated and researchers South Downs National Park, characterised by the ancient can digitally “strip away” tree cover, revealing the form of the woodlands and forestry plantations of great private estates, ground surface below. is much less well known. The models have revealed a complex, palimpsestual archae­ Historically, scholars working in this landscape have revealed ological landscape. They contain so much detail that a fascinating traces of the past, often visible as monuments National Mapping Programme has been essential to provide in areas of open pasture, or as ephemeral traces in arable a baseline quantification and qualification of the resource.
    [Show full text]
  • Interview with Mike Parker Pearson Interview Conducted by Thomas J
    PIA Volume 21 (2011), 39-47 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/pia.401 Interview with Mike Parker Pearson Interview conducted by Thomas J. T. Williams and Hana Koriech, 12th November 2011 Mike Parker Pearson is the Insti- tute of Archaeology’s newly appointed Professor of British Later Prehistory. In this interview he reflects on his experience at the birth of post-processualism, current problems and opportu- nities in modern archaeology, and the subject for which he is best known: Stonehenge. PIA: After 22 years at Sheffield Univer- and wondering what they were. At that point sity, what made you leave? my parents were living in Oxfordshire near the Uffington White Horse so I was always MPP: I wasn’t going to leave at all, but Steve looking at the earthworks,,walking about up (Stephen Shennan, IoA Director) was very there … after that, I took every opportunity persistent! that there was. Another of the key moments PIA: What are your first impressions? in my past was the very first time I went on an excavation – not just turning up for the MPP: I’m loving it here! It’s an area of Lon- day but camping and realising this was the don I’ve known for years because of course best fun that could be had. I used to work in London in the ‘80s anyway so in a way it’s coming back to old haunts. PIA: What excavation was that? I’ve got a lot of friends here who I’ve known MPP: It was a small Roman site in Somerset for a very long time.
    [Show full text]
  • Burial and Identity in the Late Neolithic And
    Burial and identity in the Late Neolithic and Copper Age of south-east Europe Susan Stratton Thesis submitted in candidature for the degree of PhD Cardiff University March 2016 CONTENTS List of figures…………………………………………………………………………7 List of tables………………………………………………………………………….14 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................ 16 Abstract ............................................................................................................................................... 17 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 18 2 Archaeological study of mortuary practice ........................................................................... 22 2.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 22 2.2 Culture history ................................................................................................................... 22 2.3 Status and hierarchy – the processualist preoccupations ............................................ 26 2.4 Post-processualists and messy human relationships .................................................... 36 2.5 Feminism and the emergence of gender archaeology .................................................. 43 2.6 Personhood, identity and memory ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Architecture and Meaning in the Structure of Stonehenge, Wiltshire, UK Timothy Darvill
    Houses of the Holy: architecture and meaning in the structure of Stonehenge, Wiltshire, UK Timothy Darvill Timothy Darvill is Professor of Archaeology in the Department of Archaeology, Anthropology and Forensic Science, Bournemouth University, UK. His research interests lie in the Neolithic of Northwest Europe and in archaeological resource management, and he has carried out fieldwork in Germany, Russia, Malta, England, Wales, and the Isle of Man. In 2008, together with Geoff Wainwright, he undertook excavations inside the stone circles at Stonehenge as part of ongoing research into the links between Stonehenge and the sources of the Bluestones in the Preseli Hills of southwest Wales. He is a member of the Editorial Advisory Board of Time & Mind. [email protected]. Abstract Stonehenge in central southern England is internationally known. Recent re-evaluations of its date and construction sequence provides an opportunity to review the meaning and purpose of key structural components. Here it is argued that the central stone structures did not have a single purpose but rather embody a series of symbolic representations. During the early third millennium this included a square-in- circle motif representing a sacred house or ‘big house’ edged by the five Sarsen Trilithons. During the late third millennium BC, as house styles changed, some of the stones were re-arranged to form a central oval setting that perpetuated the idea of the a sacred dwelling. The Sarsen Circle may have embodied a time- reckoning system based on the lunar month. From about 2500 BC more than 80 bluestones were brought to the site from sources in the Preseli Hills of west Wales about 220km distant.
    [Show full text]
  • Prehistoric Avenues and Alignments Introductions to Heritage Assets Summary
    Prehistoric Avenues and Alignments Introductions to Heritage Assets Summary Historic England’s Introductions to Heritage Assets (IHAs) are accessible, authoritative, illustrated summaries of what we know about specific types of archaeological site, building, landscape or marine asset. Typically they deal with subjects which have previously lacked such a published summary, either because the literature is dauntingly voluminous, or alternatively where little has been written. Most often it is the latter, and many IHAs bring understanding of site or building types which are neglected or little understood. This IHA provides an introduction to prehistoric avenues and alignments, which date to the Neolithic period (about 4000-2500 BC). There are several types of prehistoric monument particularly notable for their length. This document is mainly concerned with the most numerous and widespread – cursus monuments. Two other types – avenues and stone alignments – are dealt with more briefly. A brief chronology is included. Cursus monuments have important associations with a range of other categories of archaeological monument and these are explored here. A list of in-depth sources on the topic is suggested for further reading. This document has been prepared by Martyn Barber and edited by Joe Flatman and Pete Herring. It is one of a series of 41 documents. This edition published by Historic England October 2018. All images © Historic England unless otherwise stated. Please refer to this document as: Historic England 2018 Prehistoric Avenues and Alignments: Introductions to Heritage Assets. Historic England. Swindon HistoricEngland.org.uk/listing/selection-criteria/scheduling-selection/ihas-archaeology/ Front cover The plough-levelled Stonehenge Lesser Cursus, Wiltshire, showing as a soil mark.
    [Show full text]
  • Skyscapes of the Mesolithic/Neolithic Transition in Western England
    Skyscapes of the Mesolithic/Neolithic Transition in Western England Pamela Armstrong Abstract: This paper explores the skyscapes of central southern England during the Mesolithic/Neolithic transition. It suggests that those who built the structures known as the Cotswold-Severn tombs embedded architectural details within their monuments that linked to celestial horizon events for both navigational and calendrical purposes. The architectural designs found within the tombs are analysed for evidence of a cultural engagement with landscape archaeology and the sky. This period witnessed a transition between two eras, so this research considers the possibility that there may also have been a shift in the type of skywatching practised by those inhabiting this landscape during this time of change. Introduction The question considered for this paper was, ‘Does the archaeoastronomic record of the Cotswold-Severn region reflect evidence of a transition from lunar to solar alignment?’ The monuments surveyed for this research were Neolithic Cotswold Severn long barrows, much like the one below, known as Crippets (Fig. 1). These are earthen mounds which have been described by Kinnes as ‘the finest group of stone chambered tombs in England’.1 North defines a barrow as ‘a mound, deliberately erected out of earth and other material [...] and having a conscious architectural structure. Usually, but not always, built for burial purposes’.2 Darvill estimates that there are about 500 long barrows in Britain.3 The Cotswold Severn tombs 1 I. Kinnes, R. J. Mercer, and I. F. Smith, ‘Research Priorities in the British Neolithic’ (unpublished report submitted to the DoE by the Prehistoric Society, 1976), p.
    [Show full text]
  • British Archaeological Reports
    British Archaeological Reports Gordon House, 276 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 7ED, England Tel +44 (0) 1865 311914 Fax +44 (0) 1865 512231 [email protected] www.archaeopress.com TITLES IN PRINT JANUARY 2013 – BAR INTERNATIONAL SERIES The BAR series of archaeological monographs were started in 1974 by Anthony Hands and David Walker. From 1991, the publishers have been Tempus Reparatum, Archaeopress and John and Erica Hedges. From 2010 they are published exclusively by Archaeopress. Descriptions of the Archaeopress titles are to be found on www.archaeopress.com Publication proposals to [email protected] Sign up to our ALERTS SERVICE Find us on Facebook www.facebook.com/Archaeopress. and Twitter www.twitter.com/archaeopress BAR –S545, 1989 Ecology, Settlement and History in the Osmore Drainage, Peru edited by Don S. Rice, Charles Stanish and Philip R. Scarr. ISBN 0 86054 692 6. £42.00. BAR –S546, 1989 Formal Variation in Australian Spear and Spearthrower Technology by B. J. Cundy. ISBN 0 86054 693 4. £13.00. BAR –S547, 1989 The Early Roman Frontier in the Upper Rhine Area Assimilation and Acculturation on a Roman Frontier by Marcia L. Okun. ISBN 0 86054 694 2. £25.00. BAR –S548, 1989 Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology 1989 edited by Sebastian Rahtz and Julian Richards. ISBN 0 86054 695 0. £29.00. BAR –S549, 1989 La Colonización Griega en Sicilia Griegos, Indígenas y Púnicos en la Sicilia Arcaica: Interacción por Adopho J. Dominguez. ISBN 0 86054 696 9. £58.00. BAR –S550, 1989 Art, Death and Social Order The Mortuary Arts of Pre-Conquest Central Panama by Peter S.
    [Show full text]