DOCSLIB.ORG

Cultural Dwarves.Qxp

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cultural Dwarves.Qxp Cultural Dwarfs and Junk Journalism Ben Goldacre, Quackbusting and Corporate Science Martin J Walker Slingshot Publications London 2008 Cultural Dwarfs and Junk Journalism Ben Goldacre, Quackbusting and Corporate Science First Published January 2008 © Slingshot Publications 2008 BM Box 8314, London WC1N 3XX, England Type set by Viviana D Guinarte in Times New Roman & Verdana Edited by: Rose Shepherd and Viviana D Guinarte Cover Design by Andy Dark [email protected] British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Written by Martin J Walker Cultural Dwarfs and Junk Journalism: Ben Goldacre, Quackbusting and Corporate Science. 1.Ben Goldacre 2. Corporate Science 3. Quackbusters 4. Pharmaceutical companies 5. Lobby Groups. 6. Journalism 7. The Guardian Newspaper ISBN 10 0-9519646-9-0 ISBN 13 978-0-9519646-9-9 This book is given away as an e-book subject to the condition that it shall not, as a whole, or in parts, by way of trade or other- wise, be lent, resold, hired out, or otherwise circulated without the publisher’s prior consent in any form, with any cover, or any layout, than which it is published in this Pdf, and without a simi- lar condition being imposed upon the subsequent receiver. Selected non-continuous pieces of the text may be quoted in reviews and other works or campaigning leaflets and pamphlets or on the internet. You cannot hope to bribe or twist, Thank God, the British Journalist, For seeing what the man will do Unbribed, there’s no occasion to.1 Every journalist who is not too stupid or too full of himself to notice what is going on knows that what he does is morally indefensible …2 Health fraud activists tend not to be scientists them- selves, but journalists, philosophy lecturers, sociolo- gists and others in ‘soft’ disciplines. They claim to be on the side of Science, but when results appear which contradict their prejudices, they try to ‘debunk’ them, heap abuse on them, and finally simply ignore them.3 What is true cannot be minted into a falsehood, even by the most distinguished professor.4 1 Anon. 2 Malcolm, Janet. The Journalist and the Murderer. Bloomsbury. London 1991. 3 Adams, Jad. Dirty tricks to discredit alternative medicine. i to i, April-June 1994. 4 Samuel Hahnemann. Dedication To Jacques Benveniste 1935-2004 and all the innocent, honest and principled victims of mercenary skeptics and quackbusters. C O N T E N T S vii Introduction ONE 1 The campaign against Patrick Holford TWO 19 The return of a bad bug THREE 25 The Placement 52 MMR 62 Electro Magnetic Sensitivity 79 Homoeopathy FOUR 89 Returning to Holford 94 Attacks on nutritionists FIVE 149 Conclusions 149 Conclusion I 152 Conclusion II 154 Conclusion III A P P E N D I C E S ONE 159 Some notes on skepticism TWO 205 Beware the ambassadors of science THREE 209 The Skeptic connection FOUR 215 Subjects on Cloquhoun’s web site FIVE 217 HealthWatch web links SIX 219 The other medicine SEVEN 225 Advertising Goldacre EIGHT 229 Another placement NINE 241 The usual dog’s dinner TEN 243 Holford’s reply to Colquhoun’s Nature article ELEVEN 245 Burne’s responses to Goldacre TWELVE 253 Professor Simon Wessely 259 Index Introduction Broadly speaking, the essay that follows is the latest addition to my ongoing analysis of the British corporate science lobby and its popu- lar campaigning arms, skeptics and quackbusters.5 Specifically, the essay focuses on attacks on Patrick Holford, the independent nutri- tionist, while trying to place the quackbusting journalist Ben Goldacre, who began this round of attacks, in a social and political context. In its method, the essay suggests ways of investigating and pre- senting information about quackbusters, whether they appear dis- guised as journalists or lecturers in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM). The object of the essay is to familiarise contempo- rary activists in the area of alternative health with quackbusters and to give some suggestion as to how they might be exposed and cam- paigned against. As I explain later, a great deal has changed, especially in relation to the structure of the quackbuster campaign in England over the past decade; the initial amateur campaign begun in the mid eighties is now a professionally-organised lobby. But something else has changed – something that bodes ill for honest journalism and the integrity of the scientific community. As I described in my book Brave New World of Zero Risk,6 the pro-industrial science lobby now professes a philo- sophical position that should be untenable to any sane person in a 5 The other books in this series are: - Walker, Martin J., Dirty Medicine: Science, big business and the assault on natural health care. Slingshot Publications. London, 1993. 2nd edition, 1994. - Walker, Martin J., Skewed: Psychiatric hegemony and the manufacture of mental ill- ness in multiple sensitivity, Gulf War syndrome, Myalgic Encephalomyelitis and chronic fatigue syndrome. Slingshot Publications. London, 2003. - Walker, Martin J., Brave New World of Zero Risk: Covert strategies in British sci- ence policy. Slingshot Publications, 2006. Available as an e-book from: www.slingshotpublications.com 6 Ibid, Brave New World of Zero Risk. VIII Cultural Dwarfs and Junk Journalism developed society. Previously, the campaign maintained that it was unlikely that industrial or environmental factors were responsible for ill health. It now holds that technological development, and major industries such as the biotech and pharmaceutical industry, are incapable of creating human health damage: there is, in the view of The Lobby, no such thing as an adverse reaction. What was originally the ‘Health Fraud’ movement has joined with the pro-industrial science and technology lobby7 and they now travel this road together. The results of this growth in the movement and the concentration of its message were inevitable, and have been far-reaching. While pre- viously therapists and doctors, together with schools of thought, came under attack, now the attacks include as targets, the victims of adverse reactions and the damaged consumer and citizen on a much wider scale. The Lobby has left in the wake of its campaign against the envi- ronmental causes of illness, large groups of people suffering from so called ‘undiagnosed’ illnesses. From the mid-Eighties, when the pres- ent strategy was being resolved, people with myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) were publicly insulted by academics, clini- cians, lobby activists and politicians.8 Everything was done in relation to them except to carry out clinical investigations on their behalf; instead, it was said that they were mentally ill. Although this strategy 7 It was always difficult to give a name to the ‘Health Fraud’ movement, as they called themselves, or as part of it was, the ‘anti-quackery’ movement. Now that these groups are all part of the industrial science and technology lobby, I have chosen to call them collectively The Lobby, as they constitute in their various forms the biggest lobby, organised against the recognition of all kinds of environmental health hazards in Britain. 8 Op. cit., Skewed. Also, Williams, Margaret, Denigration by Design: A review, with references, of the role of Dr Simon Wessely in the perception of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME), Vol. 1. 1987 – 1996 & Vol. II. 1996 – 1999. Published pri- vately, for information contact, the Environmental Issues Forum, C/o, 176, Perth Road, Ilford, Essex IG2 6DZ. Also, the archive of the One Click Group: http://www.theoneclickgroup.co.uk Introduction IX has been evident over the past two decades in the Lobby’s continuous assault upon those who have ME-like illnesses and such things as Gulf War syndrome, it has come to a head recently, with the cases of vac- cine-damaged children and their parents.9 The Lobby will do everything in its power to ensure that no clin- ical or popular media voice is given to those who experience adverse reactions to new drugs or new technologies. It accuses those who try to speak out about adverse reactions to these, not just of bad science, but of being liars and cheats whose analysis, especially if they are ill, stem from mental instability. If any of these straw men are knocked down, being disproved by proper scientific inquiry and clinical research, The Lobby simply moves on in the hope that no one is tracking their performance. A clas- sic example of this is its early attack on those who suffered from or advocated diagnosis of food intolerance or allergy. From the early Eighties, as more cases of food intolerance began to be reported, industrial interests in Britain and America reported that both sufferers and therapists who claimed that this was a real phenomenon were mentally unstable or in the pay of vitamin companies and New Age Health gurus, that they had commercial interests in attacking dairy farming and additive manufacturers.10 Advocates of these theories were active in all the major institu- tions of health in Britain, and managed to influence large bodies of general practitioners, consultants Associations and societies.11 There came a time, however, when the objective clinical evidence began to outstrip the absurdity of the idea that everyone who claimed to have 9 See my reports of the GMC ‘fitness to practice’ hearings against Dr Andrew Wakefield, Professor Simon Murch and Professor Walker-Smith on: www.cryshame.com 10 Op. cit., Dirty Medicine. 11 See the Report of the Royal College of Physicians: Allergy: Conventional and alterative concepts, 1992. This report was completely taken over by the Campaign Against Health Fraud and written for the RCP by non-doctor Caroline Richmond, the founder of CAHF. (Cont.) X Cultural Dwarfs and Junk Journalism an allergic condition was mentally ill.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Complaint Counsel's Opposition to Renewed Motion to Quash
    FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY | FILED 4/14/2021 | OSCAR NO. 601202PUBLIC | PUBLIC UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES ________________________________________________ In the Matter of HEALTH RESEARCH LABORATORIES, LLC, a limited liability company, WHOLE BODY SUPPLEMENTS, LLC, a limited liability company, and DOCKET NO. 9397 KRAMER DUHON, individually and as an officer of HEALTH RESEARCH LABORATORIES, LLC and WHOLE BODY SUPPLEMENTS, LLC. ______________________________________________ COMPLAINT COUNSEL’S OPPOSITION TO RENEWED MOTION TO QUASH Respondents have made their prior counsel, Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP (“Olshan”), central to this matter by blaming consultants engaged at Olshan’s suggestion for Respondents’ admittedly unlawful advertising. Consequently, what those consultants told Respondents before they chose to run their deceptive advertising is crucial to determining the appropriate scope of relief. Yet Respondents refuse to produce their consultants’ work, and their consultants dubiously claim they no longer possess it. As a result, Complaint Counsel had no choice but to seek this important nonprivileged material from Olshan directly. Respondents claim attorney-client privilege, but their blanket assertion that everything Olshan may possess is allegedly “confidential” does not meet their burden. To prove consulting materials are privileged, Respondents must establish that the consultants worked exclusively to help Olshan provide legal advice, or that they are the “functional equivalent” of Respondents’ own employees. Here, neither is true. Accordingly, because Olshan possesses relevant, nonprivileged documents not available elsewhere, Respondents’ motion must be denied.1 1 Complaint Counsel’s March 30 motion to reschedule the evidentiary hearing to permit more time for discovery is pending before the Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Timothy Ferris Or James Oberg on 1 David Thomas on Eries
    The Bible Code II • The James Ossuary Controversy • Jack the Ripper: Case Closed? The Importance of Missing Information Acupuncture, Magic, i and Make-Believe Walt Whitman: When Science and Mysticism Collide Timothy Ferris or eries 'Taken' James Oberg on 1 fight' Myth David Thomas on oking Gun' Published by the Comm >f Claims of the Paranormal THE COMMITTEE FOR THE SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATION off Claims of the Paranormal AT THE CENTER FOR INQUIRY-INTERNATIONAl (ADJACENT TO THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO) • AN INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION Paul Kurtz, Chairman; professor emeritus of philosophy. State University of New York at Buffalo Barry Karr, Executive Director Joe Nickell, Senior Research Fellow Massimo Polidoro, Research Fellow Richard Wiseman, Research Fellow Lee Nisbet Special Projects Director FELLOWS James E. Alcock,* psychologist, York Univ., Susan Haack, Cooper Senior Scholar in Arts and Loren Pankratz, psychologist Oregon Health Toronto Sciences, prof, of philosophy, University of Miami Sciences Univ. Jerry Andrus, magician and inventor, Albany, C. E. M. Hansel, psychologist, Univ. of Wales John Paulos, mathematician, Temple Univ. Oregon Al Hibbs. scientist Jet Propulsion Laboratory Steven Pinker, cognitive scientist, MIT Marcia Angell, M.D., former editor-in-chief, New Douglas Hofstadter, professor of human Massimo Polidoro, science writer, author, execu­ England Journal of Medicine understanding and cognitive science, tive director CICAP, Italy Robert A. Baker, psychologist, Univ. of Kentucky Indiana Univ Milton Rosenberg, psychologist, Univ. of Stephen Barrett, M.D., psychiatrist, author, Gerald Holton, Mallinckrodt Professor of Physics Chicago consumer advocate. Allentown, Pa. and professor of history of science. Harvard Wallace Sampson, M.D., clinical professor of Barry Beyerstein.* biopsychologist.
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome to Integrative Healthcare and Applied Nutrition
    Welcome to Integrative Healthcare and Applied Nutrition IHCANmagazine What’s in a name? IHCAN editor SIMON MARTIN and Institute for Optimum Nutrition founder PATRICK HOLFORD, the man who “invented” nutritional therapy, discuss the rise and fall of complementary, alternative and integrative medicine – and preview what might be the next step. Simon Martin: As you know, I started the , all wars and tragedies, and most that don’t (world’s first) Journal of Alternative Medicine spend their last decade with rapidly decaying back in the ‘80s. JAM then morphed into JACM SM:memories? a title that has been appropriated by a US Patrickpublishing Holford: house. I still favour “alternative”, Phew! Well I’ve always had trouble with but it seems no one else does! “complementary”. So I’m pleased that we No, I think it’s time that we can finally give up pretending that we want dropped “alternative”. We are not alternative, to, or can, complement a system of medicine Simon Martin Patrick Holford we are the future of medicine. My objection that doesn’t work and doesn’t want us. to “complementary” or “alternative”, is “Alternative”? My philosophy has always been complementary or alternative to what? To that when a medical doctor tells someone But they neverHere’s say Health that. messed-up mainstream medicine that has “There is nothing we can do”, or “You’ll have to Case in point: when I wrote my series of been in existence during a period of affluence learn to live with it”, people should be aware articles in about AIDS – that in which human beings have had the greatest that there IS an alternative.
    [Show full text]
  • Patrick Holford CV
    Patrick Holford CV Education and Qualifications 1973- 1976 B.Sc. Experimental Psychology, University of York 1995 Dip.ION Honorary Diploma in Nutritional Therapy 2004 F.BANT Fellow of the Association of Nutritional Therapists Positions and Employment 1984 – 1998 Director of the Institute for Optimum Nutrition 1995 – 2005 Director of the Mental Health Project 1998 – 2005 Director of 100% Health Ltd 1998 - Director of Holford & Associates Ltd 2000 - Consultant to the Institute for Optimum Nutrition 2003 – Director of the Brain Bio Centre 2005 – CEO of the Food for the Brain Foundation History Patrick Holford is a pioneer in new approaches to health and nutrition, specialising in the field of mental health. He is widely regarded as Britain’s best- selling author and leading spokesman on nutrition and mental health issues, hence being frequently quoted almost weekly in national newspapers from the Daily Mail to the Guardian. Patrick is also popular on radio shows and national television as a presenter, interviewer and guest. He started his academic career in the field of psychology. While completing his bachelor degree in Experimental Psychology at the University of York he researched the role of nutrition in mental health and illness. He became a student of the late Dr Carl Pfeiffer, director of Princeton’s Brain Bio Center, and later a student of Dr Abram Hoffer, Director of the International Schizophrenia Foundation in Canada, who were leading the field in mental health and nutrition. In 1980 he started treating mental health patients with nutritional medicine. In 1984 Patrick founded the Institute for Optimum Nutrition (ION), a charitable and independent educational trust for the furtherance of education and research in nutrition, now the largest training school in the UK offering a degree-accredited training in nutritional therapy and widely respected as a leading edge organisation by professionals and media alike.
    [Show full text]
  • Dawkins, Collins, and the Science-Religion Debate: a New Sociological Study
    [ NEWS AND COMMENT Dawkins, Collins, and the Science-Religion Debate: A New Sociological Study DECLAN FAHY A new study appears to dent zoologist Richard Dawkins’s influence as a pub- lic intellectual, arguing that he does not persuade new readers that science and religion are in conflict. But the researchers concluded that biologist Francis Collins, director of the National Institutes of Health and an evangelical Christian, could persuade audiences that science and faith can be compatible. The sociological study, published in Public Understanding of Science, sur- veyed 10,000 Americans to assess in part how scientists who write popular Zoologist and prominent atheist Richard Dawkins (left) and Francis Collins, director of the National books influence public views of reli- Institutes of Health and an evangelical Christian. gion. It identified citizens’ views about the relationship between science and nent stars. In the second, as scholars of religion and tested whether these views Dawkins, in effect, religion have long recognized, atheists changed after learning about Dawkins, gave atheism a have attracted significant personal and author of The God Delusion, and Col- social stigma and have been granted a lins, author of The Language of God: A place in public life. limited space in U.S. public life. Scientist Presents Evidence for Belief. Dawkins had earned cultural promi- The study, funded by the philan- nence and a devoted following since the thropic John Templeton Foundation, lead author, said public attitudes to- 1976 publication of The Selfish Gene, which promotes dialogue between ward atheists could explain why Col- but with the 2006 publication of The science and religion, found that more lins had more power than Dawkins to God Delusion he became the embodi- than 21 percent of citizens had heard of sway opinions.
    [Show full text]
  • Another Lunar Effect Put to Rest
    Another Lunar Effect Put to Rest Thirty years ago, published reports suggested that plants could grow better on lunar "soil" than they could on terrestrial soils. A series of experimental errors, reporting errors, and omissions led to this conclusion. Previously unpublished data easily explain the reported effects. HAVEN SWEET his article is long overdue. It has been written in my mind hundreds of times, only to be displaced by Tmore pressing activities. I eventually convinced myself that people had forgotten the claims made after man first landed on the Moon, claims that attributed very unusual properties to the Moon. My complacency changed while listening to one of the many twenty-fifth anniversary tributes to the first lunar landing. (Now the thirtieth anniversary has passed, in July 1999, and I can wait no longer.) I heard a former NASA offi- cial refer to the quarantine testing and indicate that there was one significant result: that plants had been shown to grow better on Moon dust than they did on Earth soil. SKEPTICAL INQUIRER November/December 1999 47 This statement thrust me back to my days with the space look at how these results came to be, and how the myth grew. program, a time when similar statements were made with lit- tle regard for the facts. At that time, the press was hungry for Background of Plant Quarantine Testing news. The excitement of the lunar landing still held the pub- As part of the trip to the Moon, NASA was required to deter- lic interest in everything dealing with space. T h e spotlight was mine if "lunar organisms" existed, and if so, whether they on NASA, and some used this opportunity to present specula- posed a threat to Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Dwarves 3 .Qxp
    Cultural Dwarfs and Junk Journalism Ben Goldacre, Quackbusting and Corporate Science Martin J Walker Slingshot Publications London 2008 Cultural Dwarfs and Junk Journalism Ben Goldacre, Quackbusting and Corporate Science First Published January 2008 © Slingshot Publications 2008 BM Box 8314, London WC1N 3XX, England Type set by Viviana D Guinarte in Times New Roman & Verdana Edited by: Rose Shepherd and Viviana D Guinarte Cover Design by Andy Dark [email protected] British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Written by Martin J Walker Cultural Dwarfs and Junk Journalism: Ben Goldacre, Quackbusting and Corporate Science. 1.Ben Goldacre 2. Corporate Science 3. Quackbusters 4. Pharmaceutical companies 5. Lobby Groups. 6. Journalism 7. The Guardian Newspaper ISBN 10 0-9519646-9-0 ISBN 13 978-0-9519646-9-9 This book is given away as an e-book subject to the condition that it shall not, as a whole, or in parts, by way of trade or other- wise, be lent, resold, hired out, or otherwise circulated without the publisher’s prior consent in any form, with any cover, or any layout, than which it is published in this Pdf, and without a simi- lar condition being imposed upon the subsequent receiver. Selected non-continuous pieces of the text may be quoted in reviews and other works or campaigning leaflets and pamphlets or on the internet. You cannot hope to bribe or twist, Thank God, the British Journalist, For seeing what the man will do Unbribed, there’s no occasion to.1 Every journalist who is not too stupid or too full of himself to notice what is going on knows that what he does is morally indefensible …2 Health fraud activists tend not to be scientists them- selves, but journalists, philosophy lecturers, sociolo- gists and others in ‘soft’ disciplines.
    [Show full text]
  • Controlling the Costs of Alternative Medicine
    University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship 1999 Controlling the Costs of Alternative Medicine Lior Strahilevitz Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/journal_articles Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Lior Strahilevitz, "Controlling the Costs of Alternative Medicine," 28 Southwestern Law Review 543 (1999). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CONTROLLING THE COSTS OF ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE Lior J. Strahilevitz* I. The Rise of Alternative Medicine in the United States ......................................... 544 A. More Than Just a Fad: A Large and Growing Industry ............................................. 548 B. The Holistic Approach .............................. 549 C. Early Regulatory Responses ........................ 551 D. The Future of Alternative Medicine ................ 552 II. Challenges in Controlling the Costs of Chiropractic C are .................................................... 558 A. Chiropractic Enters the Mainstream ................ 558 B. State Regulation of Chiropractors .................. 560 C. Controlling Chiropractic Consumption .............. 563 1. Treatment Limitations .......................... 566 2. Penalizing Overtreatment ....................... 568 3. Utilization Review .............................
    [Show full text]
  • NCAHF Bulletin Boiard, 1989
    NCAHF T H E B U LLETIN BOARD JULY / AUGUST, 1989 [The NCAHF Bulletin Board is sent to members only. It is intended to stimulate and aid in · activism against health fraud, misinformation and quackery at the local, state and national levels.] STRATEGY & TACTICS FOR ADVANCING A MEDICAL care to a half-billion people. PSEUDOSCIENCE Dr. Petr Skrabanek (Dept of Community Health, Trinity Acupuncture watchers may also enjoy reading a College, University of Dublin, Ireland) told a press summary of Dr. Wallace Sampson's presentation on conference at the Royal Society of Medicine in London acupuncture given before the Bay Area Skeptics in that a Dr. Daly speaking at the founding convention of November, 1988. Dr. Sampson is putting the final the American Association of Acupuncture and Oriental touches on a NCAHF Position Paper on Acupuncture. Medicine at Los Angeles in 1981 that "Acupuncture is a Both articles may be obtained for $1 and SSAE. part of a larger struggle going on today between the old and the new" (by "new" he presumably meant 2000 NATUROPATHICCOLLEGE DESCRIBED years old acupuncture). John Bastyr College in Seattle is the leading naturopathic training school in the nation. That may Daly divided the medical profession into five groups not amount to much in a field of only two schools, according to their attitudes toward alternative medicine but JBC is significant because it has managed to and outlined how to deal with each group: acquire accreditation recognized by the U.S. (1) "the reactionary extreme" which should be ignored, Department of Education and is very close to regional isolated and exposed.
    [Show full text]
  • Food for the Brain - Mission
    Food for the Brain - Mission “To promote awareness of the link between learning, behaviour, mental health and nutrition.” www.foodforthebrain.org Food for the Brain Patrick Holford Board of Trustees Do you have depression, anxiety, schizophrenia, ADHD or autism? Dr Rona Tutt - Chair The Brain Bio Centre offers: The Brain Bio Centre is at the Institute for Optimum Nutrition in Richmond, London State of the art treatment of mental health problems using the optimum www.brainbiocentre.com nutrition approach Scientific Advisory Board The Brain Bio Centre is a Full biochemical and psychometric wholly owned subsidiary of the Food for the Brain testing before and after Foundation Professor David Smith - Chair Professional back up in consultation and by phone. One Week Later.. Parent's behaviour ratings at Cricket Green School for children scoring 60 or higher at the start 80 70 baseline endpoint 60 50 scores above 60 are abnormal 40 y *** Sh ADHD *** Defiance *** estlessness *** Anxious- R Social Problems ***Aches and pains *** *** means highly statistically significant p<.001* The percentage of people who answered ‘frequently’ or ‘always’: Become quickly impatient 82% Have low energy level 80% Energy less than it used to be 76% Feel have too much to do 67% Become anxious or tense easily 64% Have PMS/PMT (women only) 63% Easily become angry 53% Suffer from depression 44% Have difficulty concentrating 43% Become nervous/hyperactive 38% Poor memory/difficulty learning 32% Vitamins, minerals and IQ in Children non-verbal verbal 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 -2 oberts,1988 Nelson et al,1990 Nidich et al,1993 Crombie et al,1990 Southon etSnowden al,1994 et al,1997 Benton and Buts,1990Benton and Cook,1991 ynn and Harland,1998 Schoenthaler et al,1991 L Schoenthaler et al,2000 Benton and R Schoenthaler et al ,1993 Folic acid improves memory High Homocysteine Worsens School Grades 818 people aged 50 to 75 given either a vitamin containing 800 mcg of folic acid a A recent study compared the school day, or a dummy pill.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter Quality in the Heal Th Marketplace
    ENHANCING FREEDOM OF CHOICE THROUGH RELIABLE INFORMATION NEWSLETTER QUALITY IN THE HEAL TH MARKETPLACE JANUARY/FEBRUARY, 1986. NCAHF NEWSLETTER VOL 9, NO 1 COLONICS SAID TO BE WORTHLESS AND "DR." PEPPER'S DIPLOMA MILL DEGREE UTAH DENTIST'S LICENSE SUSPENDED FOR DANGEROUS RINGS ABELL AMALGAM TOXICITY CLAIMS In the September/Ocober NCAHF Newsletter Congressman Claude Pepper made TV North Ogden dentist Edwin Harrison's dental we reported that the California Board of Medical network news on December 11 and the AP wire license was suspended for 5 years with all but Quality Assurance had won a decision which service on December 12 with the announcement the first 30 days of that period stayed providing placed colonic irrigations outside the legal that he had obtained phony Ph.D. in pscyhology he refrains from false and misleading advertising scope of practice of California chiropractors. by mail from Union University in Los Angeles. claims regarding mercury toxicity from dental Now, in the September 27, 1985 issue of (NOTE: Union University is the same fillings and practicing medicine without a CALIFORNIA MORBIDITY, the weekly report establishment that Kurt Donsbach claims to license. Harrison was using an "amalgameter'' from the State's Infectious Disease Branch (IDB) have his Ph.D. in nutrition from. Another to allegedly detect mercury leakage from of the Departmentof Health Services, it is stated infamous "nutritionist'' claiming a Ph.D. from amalgam restorations and prescribing : "It is the opinion of the State's Infectious Union University is Ruth Yale Long of Houston, compounds known as X-IT and Eaters Digest to Disease Branch that neither physician's nor Texas.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Alternative Medicine at the National Institutes of Health
    Federal History 2011 Boyle The Politics of Alternative Medicine at the National Institutes of Health By Eric W. Boyle On February 26, 2009, Democratic Senator Thomas R. Harkin (Iowa) addressed the con - troversial 10-year history of the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Med - icine (NCCAM) at a Senate meeting titled “Integrative Care: A Pathway to a Healthier Nation.” Harkin began by noting that as it had be - come fashionable recently to quote Abraham Lincoln, he would quote from Lincoln’s 1862 address to Con - gress—words that he argued should inspire health care reform legislation. One month before signing the Emancipation Proclamation, Lincoln wrote, “The dogmas of the quiet past are inadequate to the stormy present. The occasion is piled high with difficulty . As our case is new, so we must think anew, and act anew. We must disenthrall ourselves, and then we shall save our country.” 1 After quoting Lincoln, Harkin continued: “Clearly, the time has come to ‘think anew’ and to ‘disenthrall ourselves’ from the dogmas and biases that have made our current health care system—which is based overwhelmingly on conventional medicine—so wasteful and dysfunctional.” 2 He argued that it was time to end the discrimination against alternative health care practices; time for America’s health care system to emphasize coor - dination and continuity of care, patient-centeredness, and prevention. For Harkin, adopting an integrative approach meant taking advantage of the very best scientifically based medi - cines and therapies, whether conventional or alternative. Yet, when turning his discussion to NCCAM’s past, Harkin expressed his disappointment with the work that the Center had conducted over the previous 10 years.
    [Show full text]