DOCSLIB.ORG

Donor Response Refreshed on 01-Oct-2021 at 08:10

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Donor Response Refreshed on 01-Oct-2021 at 08:10 Page 1 of 2 Selected Parameters Appeal Code MDRMZ014 Year / Range 1900-2100 Donor response Refreshed on 01-Oct-2021 at 08:10 MDRMZ014 - Mozambique - Tropical Cyclone Idai FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: 32,000,000 APPEAL LAUNCH DATE: 20-Mar-2019 RECEIVED TO DATE: 26,637,791 APPEAL COVERAGE TO DATE: 83% TIMEFRAME: 14-Mar-2019 to 19-Jul-2021 LOCATION: Mozambique Bilateral Cash Inkind Goods Inkind Other Income Contributions Total contributions & Transport Personnel * CHF CHF CHF CHF CHF CHF FUNDING REQUIREMENTS 32,000,000 FUNDING Opening Balance Income American Red Cross 622,731 109,364 732,095 Anadarko Petroleum Corporation 60,074 60,074 Andorran Red Cross 5,470 5,470 Australian Red Cross 357,750 357,750 Austrian Red Cross 1,390,941 166,650 1,557,591 Belgian Red Cross (Flanders) 28,473 28,473 Belgian Red Cross (Francophone) 9,758 28,473 38,230 Belgium - Private Donors 90 90 Brazilian Red Cross 11,150 11,150 British Red Cross 2,038,850 252,390 852,271 3,143,511 British Red Cross (from British Government*) 2,441,718 2,441,718 British Red Cross (from DEC (Disasters Emergency 616,288 616,288 Committee)*) Bulgarian Red Cross 2,000 2,000 Burundi Red Cross 23,021 23,021 Center for Disaster Philanthropy 1,380 1,380 China Red Cross, Hong Kong branch 50,230 50,230 Credit Suisse Foundation 1,000,000 1,000,000 Croatian Red Cross 5,205 5,205 Czech Government 222,432 222,432 Danish Red Cross 60,742 60,742 Estonia Government 33,935 33,935 European Commission - DG ECHO 170,241 170,241 Facebook 96,117 96,117 Finnish Red Cross 179,262 298,296 233,634 711,192 Fondation Trafigura 99,549 99,549 Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN (FAO) 44,028 44,028 French Red Cross 23,310 275,831 99,696 398,837 German Red Cross 56,018 20,095 166,650 242,763 Germany - Private Donors 2,598 2,598 Icelandic Red Cross 100,000 100,000 Icelandic Red Cross (from Icelandic Government*) 100,000 100,000 IFRC at the UN Inc -291 -291 IFRC at the UN Inc (from Coca Cola Foundation*) 581,257 581,257 IFRC at the UN Inc (from Patrick J.McGovern Foundation*) 98,024 98,024 Iraqi Red Crescent Society 997 997 Irish Government 573,010 573,010 Irish Red Cross Society 70,177 70,177 Italian Government Bilateral Emergency Fund 112,820 112,820 Italian Red Cross 400,000 400,000 Japanese Red Cross Society 152,411 152,411 www.ifrc.org Saving lives, changing minds. Page 2 of 2 Bilateral Cash Inkind Goods Inkind Other Income Contributions Total contributions & Transport Personnel * CHF CHF CHF CHF CHF CHF FUNDING REQUIREMENTS 32,000,000 FUNDING Opening Balance Income Liechtenstein Government 100,000 100,000 Liechtenstein Red Cross 94,965 94,965 Luxembourg Government 273,863 273,863 Luxembourg Red Cross 28,473 28,473 Nestle 93,628 93,628 Netherlands - Private Donors 12,016 12,016 New Zealand Government 336,450 336,450 New Zealand Red Cross 22,213 22,213 Norwegian Red Cross 284,539 74,046 358,585 On Line donations 40,862 40,862 Red Cross of Monaco 24,405 24,405 Singapore Red Cross Society 30,456 30,456 Slovenia Government 54,309 54,309 Spanish Government 56,771 56,771 Spanish Red Cross 24,146 46,354 627,343 697,844 Sundry Income 7,560 7,560 Swedish Red Cross 602,840 449,955 1,052,795 Swiss Red Cross 374,730 42,000 605,000 1,021,730 Switzerland - Private Donors 1,023 1,023 The Canadian Red Cross Society 7,927 88,377 8,900 3,486,554 3,591,758 The Canadian Red Cross Society (from Canadian 258,318 258,318 Government*) The Netherlands Red Cross 1,005,007 28,473 1,033,480 The Netherlands Red Cross (from Netherlands Government*) 1,923,913 1,923,913 The OPEC Fund for International Development 486,157 486,157 The Republic of Korea National Red Cross 109,394 109,394 The South African Red Cross Society (from South Africa - 38,621 38,621 Private Donors*) United States Government - USAID 491,899 491,899 United States - Private Donors 25,270 25,270 White and Case, LLP 24,230 24,230 World Remit 24,999 24,999 Write off & provisions -23,310 -23,310 Total Income 18,142,721 1,077,295 61,774 -15,749 7,371,751 26,637,791 TOTAL FUNDING 26,637,791 COVERAGE 83% *Bilateral Contributions based on information received from partners www.ifrc.org Saving lives, changing minds..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Icelandic Ngos and Humanitarian Aid a Look at the Allocation Process
    Icelandic NGOs and Humanitarian Aid A look at the Allocation Process Þorsteinn Valdimarsson Lokaverkefni til MA–gráðu í þróunarfræðum Félagsvísindasvið Icelandic NGOs and Humanitarian Aid A Look at the Allocation Process Þorsteinn Valdimarsson Lokaverkefni til MA-gráðu í þróunarfræðum Leiðbeinandi: Jónína Einarsdóttir Félags- og mannvísindadeild Félagsvísindasvið Háskóla Íslands Október 2015 Ritgerð þessi er lokaverkefni til MA-gráðu í þróunarfræðum og er óheimilt að afrita ritgerðina á nokkurn hátt nema með leyfi rétthafa. © Þorsteinn Valdimarsson 2015 Reykjavík, Ísland 2015 ABSTRACT Icelandic NGOs have increasingly engaged in humanitarian assistance in recent years with the support of The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA), which announces funds for non- governmental organisations (NGOs) in humanitarian aid biannually, and additionally in case of severe disasters. The aim of this research is to pry into the decision making process of five Icelandic NGOs when applying for such funds and the ethical implications of those decisions. The NGOs are The Red Cross, The Church Aid, SOS Children’s Villages, Save the Children and ABC Children’s Aid. Explored are the NGOs’ connections with INGOs, their Codes of Conduct, their relations with the MFA and the factors that influence their selection of projects. The research is primarily based on interviews with NGO employees. While there is much variety in the NGOs practices, they have a common ambition for the advancement of their humanitarian efforts. The NGOs appear prone to apply for funds if emergencies occur close to their own projects, are in the MFAs focus areas, are emphasised by their INGO contacts, are considered extensive by the NGOs and if they believe their expertise is of use.
    [Show full text]
  • Coping with Crisis Newsletter No
    Coping with Crisis Newsletter No. 1 2008 Hosted by Coping with Crisis No. 1 - 2008 THE I NTERNATIONAL F EDERATION R EFERENCE C ENTRE FOR P SYCHOSOCIAL S UPPORT Coping with Crisis No. 1 Spring 2008 reactions to critical events, comes an You can also read about how Magen David Editorial increasing understanding that volunteers and Adom (MDA) in Israel is scaling up the staff also are in need of psychosocial support. psychosocial support to ambulance service Contents Helping the providers. After many years with staff turn- Stress and ambulance workers While helping the helpers has been a concept over and signs of burnout in volunteers and By Chaim Rafalowski helpers – it is their for many years, it has become increasingly staff, the National Society has realized the clear what this really entails. We know the importance of not only providing technical What to do with people’s souls right and our duty importance of showing our appreciation, debriefings but also focusing on their well- By Åsta Ytre saying thank you and recognizing the work being after participation in a response. In Yogyakarta Earthquake: School In the International Red Cross and Red done, but we can do more. Support to staff cooperation with us in the Reference Centre Based PSP in Bantul and Klaten Crescent Movement, we say our people are and volunteers must go beyond practical and as well as several other sister societies, MDA By Indah Putri and Cici Riesmasari our greatest asset. We take pride in often technical management to also include is now developing its psychosocial support to Judi Fairholm awarded Florence being the first organisation to respond, thanks psychosocial support.
    [Show full text]
  • Swiss Red Cross COVID-19 Preparedness Profile(As of May 5
    Swiss Red Cross COVID-19 preparedness profile (as of May 5, 2020) Risk & Hazards Demography of mental health conditions, Psychiatric assessment, Psychological assessment, Psychological support INFORM COVID-19 Risk Index1 Population:7 8,516,543 provision in health facilities, Rehabilitation (substance abuse, physiotherapy etc.), Specialized psychological Population over 65:7 19% Hazard & Lack coping support, Training of community actors in basic Vulnerability Risk class psychological support, Training of health staff in basic Exposure capacity Income level:7 High income psychological support, Trauma treatment centres 3.7 4.3 0.0 Very Low 7 Urban (percentage): 74% 9 MHPSS target populations: INFORM COVID-19 risk rank: 189 of 191 countries Adolescents, Children, Families of missing persons, IFRC Operations (last 5 years) Migrants, People affected by violence, People affected Highlighted INFORM COVID-19 sub-components by war and armed conflict, People living with mental 11 DREF & Appeals health conditions, Survivors of sexual and gender-based Socio-Economic Vulnerability: 0.3 violence, Survivors of torture Epidemics Non-Epidemics Total Food Security: 1.3 Count 1 0 1 Other programming19, 20, 6, 21, 22, 23 Gender Based Violence (GBV): 1.8 CHF 5,709,720 0 5,709,720 People reached Movement (international & national): 2.4 All IFRC supported responses (last 5 yrs): - Program: Active: Direct: Indirect: Behaviour (awareness & trust)): 3.9 Epidemic/Pandemic: No - - Governance (effectiveness & corruption): 1.2 Swiss Red Cross Access to healthcare: 0.9 Mandate and resources13, 9, 6 CBS: No - - Health context NS Auxiliary role recognized: - Health (all program): No - - IDRL Law/Mechanism: - WASH: No - - Global Health Security Index:2 13 out of 195 Branches and warehouses: 80 DRR: Yes - - Global Health Security preparedness levels: Staff (% accidental insurance): 4,782 (100%) Social Inclusion: No - - Preventing pathogens: More prepared Volunteers (% a.
    [Show full text]
  • International Review of the Red Cross, March 1963, Third Year
    MARCH 1963-THIRD YEAR-No. 24 International Review of the Red Cross CENTENARY YEAR OF TllE RED CROSS 1963 PftOPERTY OF u.s. ARMY me JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAl'S SCHOOL LI8RAAY GENEVA INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS FOUNDED IN 1863 INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS LEOPOLD BOISSIER, Doctor of Laws, HonoraryProfessor at the Universityof Geneva, for­ mer Secretary-General to the Inter-Parliamentary Union, President (member since 1946) JACQUES CHENEVIERE, Hon. Doctor of Literature, Honorary Vice-President (1919) CARL]. BURCKHARDT, Doctor of Philosophy, former Swiss Minister to France (1933) MARTIN BODMER, Hon. Doctor of Philo~ophy, Vice-President (1940) ERNEST GLOOR, Doctor (1945) PAUL RUEGGER, former Swiss Minister to Italy and the United Kingdom, Member of the Permanent Court of Arbitration (1948) RODOLFO OLGIATI, Hon. Doctor of Medicine, former Director of the Don Suisse (1949) MARGUERITE VAN BERCHEM, former Head of Section, Central Prisoners of War Agency (1951) FREDERIC SIORDET, Lawyer, Counsellor of the International Committee of the Red Cross from 1943 to 1951, Vice-President (1951) GUILLAUME BORDIER, Certificated Engineer E.P.F., M.B.A. Harvard, Banker (1955) ADOLPHE FRANCESCHETTI, Doctor of Medicine, Professor of clinical ophthalmology at Geneva University (1958) HANS BACHMANN, Doctor of Laws, Assistant Secretary-General to the International Committee of the Red Cross from 1944 to 1946 (1958) JACQUES FREYMOND, Doctor of Literature, Director of the Graduate Institute of International Studies, Professor at the University of Geneva (1959) DIETRICH SCHINDLER, Doctor of Laws (1961) SAMUEL GONARD, former Colonel Commanding an Army Corps, former Professor at the Federal Polytechnical School (1961) HANS MEULI, Doctor of Medicine, Brigade Colonel, former Director of the Swiss Army Medical Service (1961) MARJORIE DUVILLARD, Directress of" Le Bon Secours" Nursing School (1961) MAX PETITPIERRE, Doctor of Laws, former President of the Swiss Confederation (1961) Honorary membeT~ : Miss LUCIE ODIER, Honorary Vice-President.
    [Show full text]
  • Red Cross in the EU
    A profile of the Red Cross in the EU Facts and Figures 2003 A Profile of the Red Cross in the European Union (EU) Facts and Figures In the EU, the Red Cross network represents over one million volunteers, employs 110,000 people and has over a thousand staff working internationally. Although each National Society belongs to a different social, political and cultural system and performs different tasks, all share the same basic unifying principles of the Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement. In the EU, the Red Cross is a major provider of social and emergency services and a partner in policy discussions pertaining to humanitarian issues both within and outside the EU. Since 1983, the National Red Cross Societies of the EU, together with the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, have established a representation and liaising office in Brussels, in order to facilitate cooperation between the EU National Societies and to bring the grass roots experience to the attention of the European institutions. This publication presents a profile of the 15 EU National Societies: their structure and main activities and their common interests within the EU context. It does not claim to be exhaustive. Realities, facts and figures change from day-to-day and we will update these profiles on a regular basis. The many challenges that lie ahead include the preoccupation of the Red Cross of how best to serve the most vulnerable in an ever changing environment; and the importance of its specific mandate and role within society being recognized by both national authorities and the EU Institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Table A: List of All Commitments/Contributions and Pledges As of 17 February 2010 (Table Ref: R10)
    Table A: List of all commitments/contributions and pledges as of 17 February 2010 http://www.reliefweb.int/fts (Table ref: R10) Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by donors and appealing organizations. Donor Channel Description Funding Uncommitted USD Pledges USD 3Com American RC Disaster relief 10,000 0 3M NGOs Working with key humanitarian partners like 1,000,000 0 Project HOPE and MAP International, 3M has donated numerous boxes and cases containing medical supplies such as Nexcare bandages, 3M Tegaderm transparent dressings, sterile drapes, splints, medical tapes and respiratory protection products. 3M continues to work closely with its nonprofit partners to identify other 3M products that may be needed. Abbott Laboratories UN Agencies, In-kind: Donations of medicines and nutritional 1,000,000 0 NGOs and Red products Cross ACE Charitable Foundation American RC Humanitarian assistance 250,000 0 Actavis Group NGOs Donation from Actavis in the US to Americares 10,000 0 and Operation Smile for health response in Haiti. Actavis Group NGOs; Red Donation of generic drugs, including analgesics 2,100,840 0 Cross and antibiotics. Advent Software PIH Humanitarian assistance 0 25,000 Adventist Development ADRA-Haiti Emergency assistance 0 478,000 and Relief Agency Adventist Development ADRA-Haiti Emergency assistance 0 522,000 and Relief Agency Aetna Foundation MSF Haiti relief efforts 10,000 0 Aetna Foundation American RC Haiti relief efforts 10,000 0 Aetna Foundation Food for the Haiti relief efforts 10,000 0 Poor Aetna Foundation UM For medical missions to Port-au-Prince, 10,000 0 including neurosurgeons, orthopedic surgeons and trauma/emergency physicians.
    [Show full text]
  • Six Months Report Ecuador: Earthquake
    Six months report Ecuador: Earthquake Emergency appeal n° MDREC012 GLIDE n° EQ-2016-000035-ECU Six months report Timeframe covered by this update: 22 April to 16 October 2016 Emergency Appeal operation start date: 22 April 2016 Timeframe: 16 months (ends on 21 August 2017) Appeal budget: Appeal Total estimated Red Cross and Red Crescent 15,085,628 Swiss Francs coverage: response to date: CHF 7,524,462 Swiss francs 56% Disaster Relief Emergency Fund (DREF) allocated: 405,778 Swiss francs N° of people being assisted: 85,324 people (21,331 families) Host National Society presence: The Ecuadorian Red Cross (ERC) has a national headquarters in Quito, 24 provincial boards, 110 local branches 200 staff members and for this operation has mobilized 765 volunteers. Red Cross Red Crescent Movement partners actively involved in the operation: American Red Cross, British Red Cross, Canadian Red Cross Society, Colombian Red Cross Society, Red Crescent Society of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Mexican Red Cross Society, Norwegian Red Cross Society, Philippines Red Cross, Salvadorian Red Cross Society Spanish Red Cross, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) and the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC). Red Cross Red Crescent Movement partners supporting this operation: American Red Cross, British Red Cross, Canadian Red Cross Society, Finnish Red Cross, German Red Cross, Honduran Red Cross, Hong Kong Red Cross, Japanese Red Cross Society, Republic of Korea National Red Cross, Macau Red Cross, Netherlands Red Cross (with government of the Netherlands funds), Norwegian Red Cross, Peruvian Red Cross, Swedish Red Cross (with Swedish government funds) and Swiss Red Cross.
    [Show full text]
  • International Review of the Red Cross, February 1976, Sixteenth Year
    FEBRUARY 1976 SIXTEENTH YEAR - No. 179 international review• of the red cross PROPERTY OF U.S. ARMY INTER ARMA CARITAS THE JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL'S SCHOOL LIBRARY GENEVA INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE REO CROSS FOUNOEO IN 1863 INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS Mr. ERIC MARTIN, Doctor of Medicine, Honorary Professor ofthe University ofGeneva, President (member since 1973) Mr. JEAN PICTET, Doctor of Laws, Chairman of the Legal Commission, Director of the Henry-Dunant Institute, Associate Professor at the University of Geneva, Vice-President (1967) Mr. HARALD HUBER, Doctor of Laws, Federal Court Judge, Vice-President (1969) Mrs. DENISE BINDSCHEDLER-ROBERT, Doctor of Laws, Professor at the Graduate Institute of International Studies, Geneva, Judge at the European Court of Human Rights (1967) Mr. MARCEL A. NAVILLE, Master of Arts, ICRC President from 1969 to 1973 (1967) Mr. JACQUES F. DE ROUGEMONT, Doctor of Medicine (1967) Mr. ROGER GALLOPIN, Doctor of Laws, former ICRC Director-General (1967) Mr. WALDEMAR JUCKER, Doctor of Laws, Secretary, Union syndicale suisse (1967) Mr. VICTOR H. UMBRICHT, Doctor of Laws, Managing Director (1970) Mr. PIERRE MICHELI, Bachelor of Laws, former Ambassador (1971) Mr. GILBERT ETIENNE, Professor at the Graduate Institute of International Studies and at the Institut d'etudes du developpement, Geneva (1973) Mr. ULRICH MIDDENDORP, Doctor of Medicine, head of surgical department of the Cantonal Hospital, Winterthur (1973) Mrs. MARION BOVEE-ROTHENBACH, Master of Social Work (University ofMichigan), Reader at the Ecole des Sciences sociales et politiques of the University of Lausanne (1973) Mr. HANS PETER TSCHUDI, Doctor of Laws, former Swiss Federal Councillor (1973) Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Addresses of National Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies
    ADDRESSES OF NATIONAL RED CROSS AND RED CRESCENT SOCIETIES AFGHANISTAN — Afghan Red Crescent Society, Puli COLOMBIA — Colombian Red Cross Society, Hartan, Kabul. Avenida 68, No. 66-31, Apartado Aereo 11-10, ALBANIA — Albanian Red Cross, Rue Qamil Bogotd D.E. Guranjaku No. 2, Tirana. CONGO — Congolese Red Cross, place de la Paix, ALGERIA (People's Democratic Republic of) — B.P. 4145, Brazzaville. Algerian Red Crescent, 15 bis, boulevard COSTA RICA — Costa Rica Red Cross, Calle 14, Mohamed W.Algiers. Avenida 8, Apartado 1025, San Jost. ANGOLA — Angola Red Cross, Av. Hoji Ya COTE D'lVOKE — Red Cross Society of Cote Henda 107,2. andar, Luanda. dlvoire, B.P. 1244, Abidjan. ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA — The Antigua and CUBA — Cuban Red Cross, Calle Prado 206, Coldn y Barbuda Red Cross Society, P.O. Box 727, St. Johns. Trocadero, Habana 1. ARGENTINA — The Argentine Red Cross, H. DENMARK — Danish Red Cross, 27 Blegdamsvej, Yrigoyen 2068, 7089 Buenos Aires. Postboks 2600,2100 Ktbenhavn 0. AUSTRALIA — Australian Red Cross Society, 206, DJIBOUTI — Red Crescent Society of Djibouti, Clarendon Street, East Melbourne 3002. B.P. 8, Djibouti. AUSTRIA — Austrian Red Cross, Wiedner Hauptstrasse 32, Postfach 39,1041, Vienna 4. DOMINICA — Dominica Red Cross Society, P.O. Box 59, Roseau. BAHAMAS — The Bahamas Red Cross Society, P.O. BoxN-8331,/Vajjau. DOMINICAN REPUBLIC — Dominican Red Cross, Apartado postal 1293, Santo Domingo. BAHRAIN — Bahrain Red Crescent Society, P.O. Box 882, Manama. ECUADOR — Ecuadorean Red Cross, Av. Colombia y Elizalde Esq., Quito. BANGLADESH — Bangladesh Red Crescent Society, 684-686, Bara Magh Bazar, G.P.O. Box No. 579, EGYPT — Egyptian Red Crescent Society, 29, El Galaa Dhaka.
    [Show full text]
  • Emergency Appeal 18-Month Operation Update Americas Region: Population Movement
    Emergency Appeal 18-month Operation Update Americas Region: Population Movement Emergency Appeal: MDR42004 Date of issue: 23 April 2020 Timeframe covered by this update: 6 September 2018 – 31 March 2020 Operation start date: 6 September 2018 Operation timeframe: 27 months; ends 31 December 2020 Funding Requirements: 12,500,000 CHF DREF amount initially allocated: 741,590 CHF Number of people being assisted: 455,900 people Red Cross Red Crescent Movement partners currently actively involved in the operation: Argentine Red Cross (ARC); Brazilian Red Cross (BRC); Chilean Red Cross (CRC); Ecuadorian Red Cross (ERC); German Red Cross; Guyana Red Cross Society (GRCS); International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC); International Federation of the Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC); Panama Red Cross Society (PRCS); Peruvian Red Cross (PRC); Spanish Red Cross; Trinidad and Tobago Red Cross Society (TTRCS); and Uruguayan Red Cross (URC) Other partner organizations actively involved in the operation: National governments of the affected countries; CARE; faith-based organizations (Jesuit Solidarity Service and Caritas); International Organization for Migration (IOM); Norwegian Refugee Council; Pan American Health Organization (PAHO); Save the Children; and United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (UNOCHA) Donors involved in the operation: American Red Cross; British Red Cross; British Red Cross (from British government); China Red Cross (Hong Kong branch); European Commission (ECHO); Italian Red Cross; Japanese
    [Show full text]
  • Key Findings
    II: RESULTS 4. Relevance While comparing the project objectives with the context (problem description) in the area of special state concern, the following observations can be noted: Objective: ..”Get an improved humanitarian situation for extremely vulnerable persons (EVI) in the areas of special state concern..” Context: - Slow reconstruction processes, unresolved property issues, poor job opportunities and citizenship rights in the area of return. - Too many persons where unable to cope with the prevailing social / economical situation. Humanitarian aid is being distributed and considered necessary for extremely vulnerable particularly in the remote areas. Also in cities like Knin, large quantities of food parcels are being distributed 3 times per week. It is hard to assess how dependent recipients are on food parcels. Calls for “teach me how to fish, rather than give me fish” have been heard during the evaluation mission, though particularly made by distributing agencies on behalf of beneficiaries. Food parcel distribution is an important complementary input in the nutritional basket, important for those who have little resources due to low or non-income, but it keeps on sustaining a dependency. The objective of the programme has undoubtedly been achieved through it’s implementation, realising though that the Red Cross, by nature, focuses on needs alleviating among the most vulnerable in the Society. Beneficiaries that require NGO support in income generating activities, and with that become more self-sustainable, are to a lesser extent beneficiaries of the Croatian Red Cross Community Support programme. The Red Cross, in this matter targets mainly, but not exclusively, beneficiaries who are too frail to qualify for income generating projects, as per the criteria agreed upon.
    [Show full text]
  • Cadenza Document
    International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies Donor response to M01EA032 - Humanitarian Crisis TIMEFRAME:This is an empty 21 Sep report. 01 to 18 PressDec 02 Refresh button to view the data TOTAL AMOUNT SOUGHT: 26,280,950 LOCATION: South Asia TOTAL RECEIVED TO DATE: 31,471,888 APPEAL COVERAGE TO DATE: 120% Updated on: 24 Jun 2010 National Disaster Health and Principles and Currency Amount Society Coordination Total Management Social Services Values Development CHF CHF CHF CHF CHF CHF BUDGET 26,280,950 FUNDING Opening Balance Income Cash contributions (received and pledged) American Red Cross CHF 645,465 645,465 645,465 American Red Cross USD 5,000 8,059 8,059 Andorran Red Cross CHF 8,802 8,802 8,802 Andorran Red Cross EUR 11,952 17,676 17,676 Australian Red Cross CHF 168,120 168,120 168,120 Austrian Red Cross CHF 6,447 6,447 6,447 British Red Cross AFX 21,000 537 537 British Red Cross CHF 1,314,588 1,314,588 1,314,588 British Red Cross GBP 1,198,529 2,803,423 2,803,423 Canadian Red Cross CAD 495,975 521,261 521,261 China Red Cross USD 30,000 49,515 49,515 China Red Cross, CHF 221,747 221,747 221,747 Hong Kong branch Cyprus Red Cross CHF 15,446 15,446 15,446 Danish Red Cross CHF 1,457,457 1,457,457 1,457,457 Egyptian Red USD 70,183 114,679 114,679 Crescent Finnish Red Cross CHF 54,421 54,421 54,421 Finnish Red Cross EUR 196,260 289,235 289,235 French Red Cross CHF 7,351 7,351 7,351 Germany Red Cross CHF 85,368 85,368 85,368 Hellenic Red Cross EUR 43,977 64,755 64,755 Hungarian CHF 29,236 29,236 29,236 Government Icelandic
    [Show full text]