DOCSLIB.ORG

Red Cross in the EU

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Red Cross in the EU A profile of the Red Cross in the EU Facts and Figures 2003 A Profile of the Red Cross in the European Union (EU) Facts and Figures In the EU, the Red Cross network represents over one million volunteers, employs 110,000 people and has over a thousand staff working internationally. Although each National Society belongs to a different social, political and cultural system and performs different tasks, all share the same basic unifying principles of the Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement. In the EU, the Red Cross is a major provider of social and emergency services and a partner in policy discussions pertaining to humanitarian issues both within and outside the EU. Since 1983, the National Red Cross Societies of the EU, together with the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, have established a representation and liaising office in Brussels, in order to facilitate cooperation between the EU National Societies and to bring the grass roots experience to the attention of the European institutions. This publication presents a profile of the 15 EU National Societies: their structure and main activities and their common interests within the EU context. It does not claim to be exhaustive. Realities, facts and figures change from day-to-day and we will update these profiles on a regular basis. The many challenges that lie ahead include the preoccupation of the Red Cross of how best to serve the most vulnerable in an ever changing environment; and the importance of its specific mandate and role within society being recognized by both national authorities and the EU Institutions. In view of EU enlargement, we also look forward to strengthening relations with the National Societies of the candidate countries of Eastern, Central and Southern Europe. If you already belong to the Red Cross, as a volunteer, as an employee, or as a supporter, I hope that you will find something in these pages that makes you want to find out more about colleagues and their activities in other parts of the European Union. If you work in government, in another voluntary organisation, in a research institute, or the commercial sector, we hope that you too will want to find out more about the potential for co-operation. The Red Cross/EU Office will be pleased to hear from you, welcome your comments and put you in touch with the relevant person in the National Red Cross Societies. Luc Henskens Director Red Cross/EU Office April 2003 2 CONTENTS THE RED CROSS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION.................................................................................. 5 MEMBERS OF THE GLOBAL NETWORK OF NATIONAL RED CROSS AND RED CRESCENT SOCIETIES ............ 5 COMMON VALUES AND INTERESTS ............................................................................................................ 6 DOMESTIC ACTIVITIES .............................................................................................................................. 7 EU WIDE ACTIVITIES IN KEY AREAS........................................................................................................... 9 NETWORKING.......................................................................................................................................... 11 NATIONAL RED CROSS SOCIETIES IN THE EUROPEAN UNION ............................................ 12 AUSTRIA.................................................................................................................................................. 13 BELGIUM................................................................................................................................................. 17 BRITAIN .................................................................................................................................................. 20 DENMARK ............................................................................................................................................... 23 FINLAND.................................................................................................................................................. 26 FRANCE ................................................................................................................................................... 30 GERMANY ............................................................................................................................................... 33 GREECE ................................................................................................................................................... 38 IRELAND.................................................................................................................................................. 41 ITALY ...................................................................................................................................................... 43 LUXEMBOURG ......................................................................................................................................... 46 NETHERLANDS ........................................................................................................................................ 49 PORTUGAL............................................................................................................................................... 52 SPAIN ...................................................................................................................................................... 54 SWEDEN .................................................................................................................................................. 57 NATIONAL RED CROSS SOCIETIES OF THE CANDIDATE COUNTRIES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION................................................................................................................................ 60 CZECH REPUBLIC .................................................................................................................................... 61 ESTONIA.................................................................................................................................................. 63 HUNGARY ............................................................................................................................................... 65 LATVIA.................................................................................................................................................... 67 LITHUANIA .............................................................................................................................................. 70 MALTA.................................................................................................................................................... 72 POLAND................................................................................................................................................... 74 SLOVAKIA ............................................................................................................................................... 77 SLOVENIA................................................................................................................................................ 80 3 INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATIONS OF THE MOVEMENT...................................................... 82 INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF RC/RC ............................................................................................... 83 RC/EU OFFICE........................................................................................................................................ 85 ICRC....................................................................................................................................................... 86 EUROPEAN NETWORKS OF NATIONAL RED CROSS AND RED CRESCENT SOCIETIES ............................................................................................................................................... 87 EUROPEAN LEGAL SUPPORT GROUP (ELSG) .......................................................................................... 88 EUROPEAN NETWORK OF RED CROSS SOCIETIES AGAINST VIOLENCE.................................................... 89 (ENAV) .................................................................................................................................................. 89 EUROPEAN NETWORK OF RED CROSS/RED CRESCENT SOCIETIES ON HIV/AIDS (ERNA/RECS).......... 90 EUROPEAN PUBLIC SUPPORT GROUP (EPSG) ......................................................................................... 91 EUROPEAN RED CROSS SOCIETIES NETWORK FOR PSYCHOLOGICAL SUPPORT (ENPS) .......................... 92 FIRST AID EUROPEAN NETWORK ............................................................................................................ 93 PLATFORM FOR EUROPEAN RED CROSS CO-OPERATION ON REFUGEES, ASYLUM SEEKERS AND MIGRANTS (PERCO) .............................................................................................................................. 94 WEST EUROPEAN YOUTH RED CROSS NETWORK (WEYRCN)............................................................... 95 WESTERN EUROPEAN NETWORK ON VOLUNTEER DEVELOPMENT (WENDOV)..................................... 96 GLOSSARY............................................................................................................................................... 97 4 The Red Cross in the European Union Members of the global network
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Organisational Drivers and Barriers of Strategy Implementation Within a Non – Profit Organisation
    The Organisational Drivers and Barriers of Strategy Implementation within a Non – Profit Organisation A Case Study at the Netherlands Red Cross Master of Science Graduation Thesis Richard van Donselaar University of Twente May 21 st , 2012 Author R. van Donselaar (Richard) Student ID: s1063596 Master Business Administration [email protected] University Supervisors Dr. M. L. Ehrenhard (Michel) +31 (0) 53 489 4531 [email protected] Dr. ir. J. Kraaijenbrink (Jeroen) +31 (0) 53 489 5443 [email protected] Company Supervisor A. van Wesemael (Annemieke) +31 (0) 30 254 7050 [email protected] The Netherlands Red Cross Koningsweg 2 3582 GE Utrecht +31 (0) 30 252 0134 http://www.rodekruis.nl University of Twente Faculty: School of Management & Governance Drienerlolaan 5 7522 NB Enschede +31 (0) 53 489 9111 http://www.utwente.nl/onderwijs/mb/ Key words : Drivers*, barriers*, non – profit organisation, strategy implementation. * A wide variety of synonyms are available on page 11 of this research. Master’s Thesis | R. van Donselaar - 2 - Preface In front of you, you have my Master’s thesis, written for the study programme Business Administration. It has been the final part of my Master’s degree, wherein I have specialised in the field of Innovation & Entrepreneurship. The result of this Master thesis is one of the master programs the University’s School of Management and Governance (SMG) offers to its students. I would like to take the opportunity to thank all people that in some way have contributed to my research and this Master thesis. First of all I would like to thank my thesis supervisors.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Systems in Transition
    61575 Latvia HiT_2_WEB.pdf 1 03/03/2020 09:55 Vol. 21 No. 4 2019 Vol. Health Systems in Transition Vol. 21 No. 4 2019 Health Systems in Transition: in Transition: Health Systems C M Y CM MY CY CMY K Latvia Latvia Health system review Daiga Behmane Alina Dudele Anita Villerusa Janis Misins The Observatory is a partnership, hosted by WHO/Europe, which includes other international organizations (the European Commission, the World Bank); national and regional governments (Austria, Belgium, Finland, Kristine Klavina Ireland, Norway, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the Veneto Region of Italy); other health system organizations (the French National Union of Health Insurance Funds (UNCAM), the Dzintars Mozgis Health Foundation); and academia (the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) and the Giada Scarpetti London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (LSHTM)). The Observatory has a secretariat in Brussels and it has hubs in London at LSE and LSHTM) and at the Berlin University of Technology. HiTs are in-depth profiles of health systems and policies, produced using a standardized approach that allows comparison across countries. They provide facts, figures and analysis and highlight reform initiatives in progress. Print ISSN 1817-6119 Web ISSN 1817-6127 61575 Latvia HiT_2_WEB.pdf 2 03/03/2020 09:55 Giada Scarpetti (Editor), and Ewout van Ginneken (Series editor) were responsible for this HiT Editorial Board Series editors Reinhard Busse, Berlin University of Technology, Germany Josep Figueras, European
    [Show full text]
  • Icelandic Ngos and Humanitarian Aid a Look at the Allocation Process
    Icelandic NGOs and Humanitarian Aid A look at the Allocation Process Þorsteinn Valdimarsson Lokaverkefni til MA–gráðu í þróunarfræðum Félagsvísindasvið Icelandic NGOs and Humanitarian Aid A Look at the Allocation Process Þorsteinn Valdimarsson Lokaverkefni til MA-gráðu í þróunarfræðum Leiðbeinandi: Jónína Einarsdóttir Félags- og mannvísindadeild Félagsvísindasvið Háskóla Íslands Október 2015 Ritgerð þessi er lokaverkefni til MA-gráðu í þróunarfræðum og er óheimilt að afrita ritgerðina á nokkurn hátt nema með leyfi rétthafa. © Þorsteinn Valdimarsson 2015 Reykjavík, Ísland 2015 ABSTRACT Icelandic NGOs have increasingly engaged in humanitarian assistance in recent years with the support of The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA), which announces funds for non- governmental organisations (NGOs) in humanitarian aid biannually, and additionally in case of severe disasters. The aim of this research is to pry into the decision making process of five Icelandic NGOs when applying for such funds and the ethical implications of those decisions. The NGOs are The Red Cross, The Church Aid, SOS Children’s Villages, Save the Children and ABC Children’s Aid. Explored are the NGOs’ connections with INGOs, their Codes of Conduct, their relations with the MFA and the factors that influence their selection of projects. The research is primarily based on interviews with NGO employees. While there is much variety in the NGOs practices, they have a common ambition for the advancement of their humanitarian efforts. The NGOs appear prone to apply for funds if emergencies occur close to their own projects, are in the MFAs focus areas, are emphasised by their INGO contacts, are considered extensive by the NGOs and if they believe their expertise is of use.
    [Show full text]
  • Heatwave Guide for Cities
    HEATWAVE GUIDE FOR CITIES HEATWAVE GUIDE FOR CITIES 2 HEATWAVE GUIDE FOR CITIES Heatwaves are deadly and their impacts are on the rise globally due to climate change. But this is not inevitable; it is up to us to prevent this public-health crisis from impacting our neighbours, family members and friends. Every year, heatwaves claim the lives of infants, older people, and people with chronic health conditions. The urban poor frequently bear the brunt of this silent emergency. In addition to threatening the lives and health of vulnerable popula- tions, heatwaves have cascading impacts in other areas of society, such as reduced economic output, strained health systems and rolling power outages. The Lancet estimates that in 2017, 153 billion hours of work were lost due to extreme heat. What is unacceptable about this silent emergency is that simple, low-cost actions such as ordinary citizens checking on vulnerable neighbours can save lives during episodes of extreme heat. As many as 5 billion people live in areas of the world where heatwaves can be forecast before they happen, which means we have time to take early action to save lives. To address the existing need and reduce future risks posed by climate change, we need collective global action to scale up early warning systems for heat. People living in urban areas are amongst the hardest hit when a heatwave occurs because these are hotter than the surrounding countryside. Along with climate change, urbanization is one of the most transformative trends of this century and the last. Over half the world now lives in urban areas and this is projected to increase to two-thirds by 2050.
    [Show full text]
  • Coping with Crisis Newsletter No
    Coping with Crisis Newsletter No. 1 2008 Hosted by Coping with Crisis No. 1 - 2008 THE I NTERNATIONAL F EDERATION R EFERENCE C ENTRE FOR P SYCHOSOCIAL S UPPORT Coping with Crisis No. 1 Spring 2008 reactions to critical events, comes an You can also read about how Magen David Editorial increasing understanding that volunteers and Adom (MDA) in Israel is scaling up the staff also are in need of psychosocial support. psychosocial support to ambulance service Contents Helping the providers. After many years with staff turn- Stress and ambulance workers While helping the helpers has been a concept over and signs of burnout in volunteers and By Chaim Rafalowski helpers – it is their for many years, it has become increasingly staff, the National Society has realized the clear what this really entails. We know the importance of not only providing technical What to do with people’s souls right and our duty importance of showing our appreciation, debriefings but also focusing on their well- By Åsta Ytre saying thank you and recognizing the work being after participation in a response. In Yogyakarta Earthquake: School In the International Red Cross and Red done, but we can do more. Support to staff cooperation with us in the Reference Centre Based PSP in Bantul and Klaten Crescent Movement, we say our people are and volunteers must go beyond practical and as well as several other sister societies, MDA By Indah Putri and Cici Riesmasari our greatest asset. We take pride in often technical management to also include is now developing its psychosocial support to Judi Fairholm awarded Florence being the first organisation to respond, thanks psychosocial support.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategy 2010
    2005 Mid-Term Review Strategy 2010 © International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies Any part of this report may be cited, copied, translated into other languages or adapted to meet local needs without prior permission from the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, provided that the source is clearly stated. 2005 International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies PO Box 372 CH-1211 Geneva 19 Switzerland Telephone: +41 22 730 4222 Telefax: +41 22 733 0395 E-mail: [email protected] Web site: www.ifrc.org Contents Executive summary 2 Part one Report of the review team 1 Introduction 5 2 Objectives 5 3 Methodology 5 4 The findings 7 5 The changing context 8 6 Our place in the world 9 7 Vision, mission and values 10 8 The three strategic directions 12 9 Strategic direction 1: “Responsive to local vulnerability” 13 10 Strategic direction 1: “Focused on the areas where they can have greatest impact” 13 11 Core area 1: Promotion of the Movement’s fundamental principles and humanitarian values 15 12 Core area 2: Disaster Preparedness 15 13 Core area 3: Disaster Response 17 14 Core area 4: Health and care in the community 19 15 Strategic direction 2: Well-functioning National Societies 21 16 Strategic direction 3: Working together effectively 23 Part two Performance framework 1 Implementing Strategy 2010 25 2 Establishing a framework for achieving our goals 25 3 Describing the framework 25 4 Assumptions 26 5 The framework 26 Part three Case studies 29 Appendix 1 Participants in the review 41 2 Contributors to the review 42 3 List of documents consulted 47 Review team Sir Nicholas Young - British Red Cross Mrs Kristiina Kumpula - Finnish Red Cross Mrs Geri Lau - Singapore Red Cross Mr Alphonse Kalinganire - Rwanda Red Cross 28th April 2005 3 Executive summary 1 The mid-term review of Strategy 2010 was carried out pursuant to a resolution of the General Assembly in 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Advisory Service on International Humanitarian Law
    ADVISORY SERVICE ON INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW NATIONAL COMMITTEES AND SIMILAR BODIES ON INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW (25 January 2021) NATIONAL COMMITTEES AND SIMILAR BODIES ON INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW As of 25 January 2021 (total by region) EUROPE CENTRAL ASIA ASIA & PACIFIC THE AMERICAS AFRICA MIDDLE EAST Austria Kazakhstan Australia Argentina Algeria Bahrain Belarus Kyrgyzstan Bangladesh Bolivia Benin Egypt Belgium Tajikistan China (People’s Republic of) Brazil Botswana Iran (Islamic Republic of) Bulgaria Turkmenistan Cook Islands Canada Burkina Faso Iraq Croatia Indonesia Chile Cabo Verde Jordan Cyprus Japan Colombia Comoros Kuwait Czech Republic Kiribati Costa Rica Côte d'Ivoire Lebanon Denmark Malaysia Dominican Republic Eswatini Oman Finland Mongolia1* El Salvador Gambia Palestine France Nepal Ecuador Guinea-Bissau Qatar Georgia New Zealand Guatemala Kenya Saudi Arabia Germany Papua New Guinea Honduras Lesotho Syrian Arab Republic Greece Philippines Mexico Liberia United Arab Emirates Hungary Republic of Korea (the) Nicaragua Libya Yemen Iceland Samoa Panama Madagascar Ireland Sri Lanka Paraguay Malawi Italy (two committees) Vanuatu Peru Mauritius Lithuania Trinidad & Tobago Morocco Netherlands Uruguay Namibia Republic of North Macedonia Venezuela Niger Poland (two committees) Nigeria Republic of Moldova Senegal Romania Seychelles Slovakia Sierra Leone Slovenia South Africa Spain Sudan Sweden (two committees) Togo Switzerland Tunisia Ukraine Uganda United Kingdom Zambia Zimbabwe TOTAL: 30 TOTAL: 4 TOTAL: 17 TOTAL:
    [Show full text]
  • Swiss Red Cross COVID-19 Preparedness Profile(As of May 5
    Swiss Red Cross COVID-19 preparedness profile (as of May 5, 2020) Risk & Hazards Demography of mental health conditions, Psychiatric assessment, Psychological assessment, Psychological support INFORM COVID-19 Risk Index1 Population:7 8,516,543 provision in health facilities, Rehabilitation (substance abuse, physiotherapy etc.), Specialized psychological Population over 65:7 19% Hazard & Lack coping support, Training of community actors in basic Vulnerability Risk class psychological support, Training of health staff in basic Exposure capacity Income level:7 High income psychological support, Trauma treatment centres 3.7 4.3 0.0 Very Low 7 Urban (percentage): 74% 9 MHPSS target populations: INFORM COVID-19 risk rank: 189 of 191 countries Adolescents, Children, Families of missing persons, IFRC Operations (last 5 years) Migrants, People affected by violence, People affected Highlighted INFORM COVID-19 sub-components by war and armed conflict, People living with mental 11 DREF & Appeals health conditions, Survivors of sexual and gender-based Socio-Economic Vulnerability: 0.3 violence, Survivors of torture Epidemics Non-Epidemics Total Food Security: 1.3 Count 1 0 1 Other programming19, 20, 6, 21, 22, 23 Gender Based Violence (GBV): 1.8 CHF 5,709,720 0 5,709,720 People reached Movement (international & national): 2.4 All IFRC supported responses (last 5 yrs): - Program: Active: Direct: Indirect: Behaviour (awareness & trust)): 3.9 Epidemic/Pandemic: No - - Governance (effectiveness & corruption): 1.2 Swiss Red Cross Access to healthcare: 0.9 Mandate and resources13, 9, 6 CBS: No - - Health context NS Auxiliary role recognized: - Health (all program): No - - IDRL Law/Mechanism: - WASH: No - - Global Health Security Index:2 13 out of 195 Branches and warehouses: 80 DRR: Yes - - Global Health Security preparedness levels: Staff (% accidental insurance): 4,782 (100%) Social Inclusion: No - - Preventing pathogens: More prepared Volunteers (% a.
    [Show full text]
  • International Review of the Red Cross, March 1963, Third Year
    MARCH 1963-THIRD YEAR-No. 24 International Review of the Red Cross CENTENARY YEAR OF TllE RED CROSS 1963 PftOPERTY OF u.s. ARMY me JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAl'S SCHOOL LI8RAAY GENEVA INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS FOUNDED IN 1863 INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS LEOPOLD BOISSIER, Doctor of Laws, HonoraryProfessor at the Universityof Geneva, for­ mer Secretary-General to the Inter-Parliamentary Union, President (member since 1946) JACQUES CHENEVIERE, Hon. Doctor of Literature, Honorary Vice-President (1919) CARL]. BURCKHARDT, Doctor of Philosophy, former Swiss Minister to France (1933) MARTIN BODMER, Hon. Doctor of Philo~ophy, Vice-President (1940) ERNEST GLOOR, Doctor (1945) PAUL RUEGGER, former Swiss Minister to Italy and the United Kingdom, Member of the Permanent Court of Arbitration (1948) RODOLFO OLGIATI, Hon. Doctor of Medicine, former Director of the Don Suisse (1949) MARGUERITE VAN BERCHEM, former Head of Section, Central Prisoners of War Agency (1951) FREDERIC SIORDET, Lawyer, Counsellor of the International Committee of the Red Cross from 1943 to 1951, Vice-President (1951) GUILLAUME BORDIER, Certificated Engineer E.P.F., M.B.A. Harvard, Banker (1955) ADOLPHE FRANCESCHETTI, Doctor of Medicine, Professor of clinical ophthalmology at Geneva University (1958) HANS BACHMANN, Doctor of Laws, Assistant Secretary-General to the International Committee of the Red Cross from 1944 to 1946 (1958) JACQUES FREYMOND, Doctor of Literature, Director of the Graduate Institute of International Studies, Professor at the University of Geneva (1959) DIETRICH SCHINDLER, Doctor of Laws (1961) SAMUEL GONARD, former Colonel Commanding an Army Corps, former Professor at the Federal Polytechnical School (1961) HANS MEULI, Doctor of Medicine, Brigade Colonel, former Director of the Swiss Army Medical Service (1961) MARJORIE DUVILLARD, Directress of" Le Bon Secours" Nursing School (1961) MAX PETITPIERRE, Doctor of Laws, former President of the Swiss Confederation (1961) Honorary membeT~ : Miss LUCIE ODIER, Honorary Vice-President.
    [Show full text]
  • Relief in 1967
    INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE Relief in 1967 Last year was notable, for National Societies as well as for Red Cross international institutions, for its intense relief work. Readers may be interested in the following tables which show this. It will be noticed that there were thirty-four beneficiary countries and over fifty donor countries. SUMMARY TABLE OF RELIEF IN CASH OR IN KIND PROVIDED BY THE ICRC FROM ITS OWN FUNDS, OR FORWARDED AND DISTRIBUTED BY THE ICRC IN 1967 Value in Countries Category of aided persons Swiss francs Cambodia 1. Despatch from Geneva of 2 ambulances to the Cambodian Red Cross for its action in favour of sick refugees Purchase price plus transport 75,000.— Contribution for the building of an infirmary at Beng Khtum 17,647.— West Bank Despatch from Geneva of tarpaulins, blankets, under- of the Jordan clothing, woollen wear for children, raisins, medical supplies 307,000.— Local purchases for relief distributions by delegates .... 80,000.— Greece 1. Medical supplies to the Hellenic' Red Cross for its medical work in favour of deportees 17,300.— 2. Warm clothing, blankets, foodstuffs, toys for children with their mothers in detention: forwarded from Geneva and purchased locally 2,600.— carry forward 499,547.— 407 INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE Value in Countries Category of aided persons Swiss francs brought forward 499,547.— Haiti Medical supplies, surgical kits, dressing material; sent from Geneva to the Haitian Red Cross 25,537.— Hungary Pharmaceuticals sent to the Hungarian Red Cross on request 10,900.— India 10 tons powdered milk sent from Geneva for the government's feeding programme 45,000.— Iraq Vitamin products to the Iraqi Red Crescent 1,500.— Israel Cash donations received for and transferred to Magen David Adorn 45,091, Food parcels to POW's 35,000.
    [Show full text]
  • Swiss Red Cross International Cooperation Programme Report 2018
    Swiss Red Cross International Cooperation Programme Report 2018 25 April 2019 Swiss Red Cross Rainmattstrasse 10/P.O. Box CH-3001 Bern Phone +41 58 400 4111 www.redcross.ch Cover Page Role play in a health centre in Laos. Pregnant women attend an education session on the importance to give birth in a health centre or hospital. Cover photo © SRC All photos © divers Table of contents Synopsis 7 1. Institutional context 11 The International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement 11 Swiss Red Cross 11 Department International Cooperation 12 2. Global context 15 3. Programme results 2018 19 Health 20 Reproductive health 22 Nutrition 26 Disease control 30 Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) 33 Ageing and health 40 Blood safety 46 Eye Health 51 Disaster Risk Management 55 Emergency response 56 Recovery 60 Disaster risk reduction 64 Institutional preparedness 72 4. Learning process: Partnership and National Society Development 77 5. Public Affairs and awareness-raising in Switzerland 83 6. Finance 85 Financial overview 85 Financial results and SDC programme and project contribution 87 Programme Budget 2019 88 3 Annex 1: Result framework of the SRC Programme 2017–20 90 Annex 2: Standard outcome indicators measured in 2018 92 Annex 3: Beneficiary statistics 2018 94 Annex 4: Expenditures and SDC contribution 2018 by country 96 Annex 5: Deviations budget versus expenditures 2018 by country 98 Annex 6: Learnings 2018 – Evaluations, studies and reviews 99 Annex 7: Publications and presentations at conferences 2018 100 Annex 8: Country Summaries 102 Armenia
    [Show full text]
  • Six Months Report Ecuador: Earthquake
    Six months report Ecuador: Earthquake Emergency appeal n° MDREC012 GLIDE n° EQ-2016-000035-ECU Six months report Timeframe covered by this update: 22 April to 16 October 2016 Emergency Appeal operation start date: 22 April 2016 Timeframe: 16 months (ends on 21 August 2017) Appeal budget: Appeal Total estimated Red Cross and Red Crescent 15,085,628 Swiss Francs coverage: response to date: CHF 7,524,462 Swiss francs 56% Disaster Relief Emergency Fund (DREF) allocated: 405,778 Swiss francs N° of people being assisted: 85,324 people (21,331 families) Host National Society presence: The Ecuadorian Red Cross (ERC) has a national headquarters in Quito, 24 provincial boards, 110 local branches 200 staff members and for this operation has mobilized 765 volunteers. Red Cross Red Crescent Movement partners actively involved in the operation: American Red Cross, British Red Cross, Canadian Red Cross Society, Colombian Red Cross Society, Red Crescent Society of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Mexican Red Cross Society, Norwegian Red Cross Society, Philippines Red Cross, Salvadorian Red Cross Society Spanish Red Cross, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) and the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC). Red Cross Red Crescent Movement partners supporting this operation: American Red Cross, British Red Cross, Canadian Red Cross Society, Finnish Red Cross, German Red Cross, Honduran Red Cross, Hong Kong Red Cross, Japanese Red Cross Society, Republic of Korea National Red Cross, Macau Red Cross, Netherlands Red Cross (with government of the Netherlands funds), Norwegian Red Cross, Peruvian Red Cross, Swedish Red Cross (with Swedish government funds) and Swiss Red Cross.
    [Show full text]