List of Participants
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Strategy 2010
2005 Mid-Term Review Strategy 2010 © International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies Any part of this report may be cited, copied, translated into other languages or adapted to meet local needs without prior permission from the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, provided that the source is clearly stated. 2005 International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies PO Box 372 CH-1211 Geneva 19 Switzerland Telephone: +41 22 730 4222 Telefax: +41 22 733 0395 E-mail: [email protected] Web site: www.ifrc.org Contents Executive summary 2 Part one Report of the review team 1 Introduction 5 2 Objectives 5 3 Methodology 5 4 The findings 7 5 The changing context 8 6 Our place in the world 9 7 Vision, mission and values 10 8 The three strategic directions 12 9 Strategic direction 1: “Responsive to local vulnerability” 13 10 Strategic direction 1: “Focused on the areas where they can have greatest impact” 13 11 Core area 1: Promotion of the Movement’s fundamental principles and humanitarian values 15 12 Core area 2: Disaster Preparedness 15 13 Core area 3: Disaster Response 17 14 Core area 4: Health and care in the community 19 15 Strategic direction 2: Well-functioning National Societies 21 16 Strategic direction 3: Working together effectively 23 Part two Performance framework 1 Implementing Strategy 2010 25 2 Establishing a framework for achieving our goals 25 3 Describing the framework 25 4 Assumptions 26 5 The framework 26 Part three Case studies 29 Appendix 1 Participants in the review 41 2 Contributors to the review 42 3 List of documents consulted 47 Review team Sir Nicholas Young - British Red Cross Mrs Kristiina Kumpula - Finnish Red Cross Mrs Geri Lau - Singapore Red Cross Mr Alphonse Kalinganire - Rwanda Red Cross 28th April 2005 3 Executive summary 1 The mid-term review of Strategy 2010 was carried out pursuant to a resolution of the General Assembly in 2003. -
Advisory Service on International Humanitarian Law
ADVISORY SERVICE ON INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW NATIONAL COMMITTEES AND SIMILAR BODIES ON INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW (25 January 2021) NATIONAL COMMITTEES AND SIMILAR BODIES ON INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW As of 25 January 2021 (total by region) EUROPE CENTRAL ASIA ASIA & PACIFIC THE AMERICAS AFRICA MIDDLE EAST Austria Kazakhstan Australia Argentina Algeria Bahrain Belarus Kyrgyzstan Bangladesh Bolivia Benin Egypt Belgium Tajikistan China (People’s Republic of) Brazil Botswana Iran (Islamic Republic of) Bulgaria Turkmenistan Cook Islands Canada Burkina Faso Iraq Croatia Indonesia Chile Cabo Verde Jordan Cyprus Japan Colombia Comoros Kuwait Czech Republic Kiribati Costa Rica Côte d'Ivoire Lebanon Denmark Malaysia Dominican Republic Eswatini Oman Finland Mongolia1* El Salvador Gambia Palestine France Nepal Ecuador Guinea-Bissau Qatar Georgia New Zealand Guatemala Kenya Saudi Arabia Germany Papua New Guinea Honduras Lesotho Syrian Arab Republic Greece Philippines Mexico Liberia United Arab Emirates Hungary Republic of Korea (the) Nicaragua Libya Yemen Iceland Samoa Panama Madagascar Ireland Sri Lanka Paraguay Malawi Italy (two committees) Vanuatu Peru Mauritius Lithuania Trinidad & Tobago Morocco Netherlands Uruguay Namibia Republic of North Macedonia Venezuela Niger Poland (two committees) Nigeria Republic of Moldova Senegal Romania Seychelles Slovakia Sierra Leone Slovenia South Africa Spain Sudan Sweden (two committees) Togo Switzerland Tunisia Ukraine Uganda United Kingdom Zambia Zimbabwe TOTAL: 30 TOTAL: 4 TOTAL: 17 TOTAL: -
Red Cross in the EU
A profile of the Red Cross in the EU Facts and Figures 2003 A Profile of the Red Cross in the European Union (EU) Facts and Figures In the EU, the Red Cross network represents over one million volunteers, employs 110,000 people and has over a thousand staff working internationally. Although each National Society belongs to a different social, political and cultural system and performs different tasks, all share the same basic unifying principles of the Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement. In the EU, the Red Cross is a major provider of social and emergency services and a partner in policy discussions pertaining to humanitarian issues both within and outside the EU. Since 1983, the National Red Cross Societies of the EU, together with the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, have established a representation and liaising office in Brussels, in order to facilitate cooperation between the EU National Societies and to bring the grass roots experience to the attention of the European institutions. This publication presents a profile of the 15 EU National Societies: their structure and main activities and their common interests within the EU context. It does not claim to be exhaustive. Realities, facts and figures change from day-to-day and we will update these profiles on a regular basis. The many challenges that lie ahead include the preoccupation of the Red Cross of how best to serve the most vulnerable in an ever changing environment; and the importance of its specific mandate and role within society being recognized by both national authorities and the EU Institutions. -
The Red Cross Approach to Resilience
Fact Sheet The Red Cross Approach to Resilience REF. RCEU 04/2014 – 004 02 April 2014 This are the recommendations of the National Red Cross Societies of the Member Resilience States of the European Union and the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC)(1) Since its creation, the Red Cross has been guided by a clear set of humanitarian principles and values that aims, in one way or another, to effectively contribute to building resilience. IFRC’s Strategy 2020 asserts that our specific contribution to sustainable development is through Our Principles strengthening community resilience. We are guided at all times by our Fundamental Principles: To meet these ambitions the Red Cross is developing guidelines and trainings for the formulation Humanity and implementation of community resilience projects. Impartiality The Red Cross has a unique auxiliary role to the Public Authorities. It is composed by a vast net Neutrality of grass root volunteers integrated in their communities. Its universal presence and its neutrality Independence provide them a unique capacity to work in fragile contexts. For all these reasons, the Red Cross has Voluntary Services a comparative advantage to support community resilience in Fragile States. The guidelines and Unity trainings under development are taking this advantage into consideration. Universality A Broad Definition The Red Cross defines resilience as: the ability of individuals, communities, organizations, or coun- tries exposed to disasters and crises and underlying vulnerabilities to anticipate, reduce the impact of, cope with and recover from the effects of adversity without compromising their long term pros- pects. Resilience is not just the immediate ability to respond to negative events but rather a process of positive adaptation before, during and after adversity. -
Mental Health Matters: Mapping of Mental Health and Psychosocial Support Activities Within the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement
Mental Health Matters: Mapping of Mental Health and Psychosocial Support Activities within the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement December 2019 1 Executive summary The International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement Project on Addressing 74% (120 NS, the IFRC and the ICRC) have one or more focal points for MH Mental Health and Psychosocial Consequences of Armed Conflicts, Natural Disas- and/or PSS in their organization. Collectively, within the 162 NS respondents, ters and other Emergencies (MOMENT) has conducted a survey to establish a da- IFRC and ICRC, nearly 27.000 staff and volunteers are reported to be trained in taset and baseline for mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS) activities basic community-based psychosocial support, and more than 42.000 staff and carried out by the Movement. A total of 162 National Societies (NS), the Interna- volunteers are trained in PFA within the 162 NS and IFRC. Further, 77% (125 NS, tional Federation of the Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) and the In- the IFRC and the ICRC) have some sort of system in place to monitor the MH ternational Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) participated. This report contains and/or PSS activities of their organization. the results of the survey. 34% of respondents (55 NS) have no budget dedicated for MHPSS activities, and 96% of respondents (156 NS, the IFRC and ICRC) provide mental health (MH) 83% (135 NS and the IFRC report that lack of or limited funds is an obstacle for and/or psychosocial support (PSS) activities. In the past year psychological first delivering MH and/or PSS activities. -
Cadenza Document
Page 1 of 7 Selected Parameters Donor response Appeal Code MDRNP008 Year / Range Refreshed on 27-Sep-2019 at 08:07 MDRNP008 - Nepal - Earthquake FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: 56,395,244 APPEAL LAUNCH DATE: 26-Apr-2015 RECEIVED TO DATE: 60,005,990 APPEAL COVERAGE TO DATE: 106% TIMEFRAME: 25-Apr-2015 to 30-Jun-2019 LOCATION: Nepal Bilateral Cash Inkind Goods Inkind Other Income Contributions Total contributions & Transport Personnel * CHF CHF CHF CHF CHF CHF FUNDING REQUIREMENTS 56,395,244 FUNDING Opening Balance Income Accenture 24,970 -1,241 23,730 AECOM 5,048 -252 4,796 Afghanistan Red Crescent 23,249 23,249 Airbus 67,753 -3,388 64,365 Albanian Red Cross 18,974 18,974 American Red Cross 6,218,896 480,001 395,063 7,093,960 Andorran Red Cross 23,969 23,969 Apple iTunes 622,832 -31,142 591,691 Australian Red Cross 3,532,034 511,902 22,800 4,066,736 Australian Red Cross (from Australian Government*) 812,092 812,092 Austrian Red Cross 797,368 799,115 106,800 1,703,283 Austrian Red Cross (from Austrian Government*) 1,085,650 1,085,650 Avanade 7,616 -381 7,235 Avery Dennison Foundation 9,862 9,862 Avnet 865 -43 822 Bangladesh Red Crescent Society 17,238 17,238 Belarus Red Cross 3,217 3,217 Belgian Red Cross (Flanders) 97,329 97,329 Botswana Red Cross Society (from Botswana Government*) 17,503 17,503 BP Foundation 26,910 26,910 Brazilian Red Cross 68,679 68,679 British Red Cross 1,852,725 1,059,344 250,500 3,162,569 British Red Cross (from British Government*) 4,139,877 4,139,877 British Red Cross (from DEC (Disasters Emergency 652,451 652,451 Committee)*) -
Brief Overview of the Slovenian Red Cross
BRIEF OVERVIEW OF THE SLOVENIAN RED CROSS www.rks.si December 2018 The SRC shall help prevent and alleviate human suffering, protect life and health, promote healthy life by being active and guarantee the respect of human rights, especially during armed conflicts, natural disasters and other cases of emergency. INTRODUCTION The Slovenian Red Cross as an independent national society grew from the insights, will, efforts and work of numerous generations of Red Cross members in Slovenia. Among almost one hundred humanitarian organizations in Slovenia, the Slovenian Red Cross is the most recognizable. One of the important pillars of the Slovenian Red Cross reputation is an intact tradition of the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement and consistent implementation of the Fundamental Principles: humanity, impartiality, neutrality, independence, voluntary service, unity and universality. Furthermore, the amazing results that no other humanitarian organization in Slovenia can achieve in such a large scope and reach speak for itself. The Slovenian Red Cross irreplaceable contribution towards health and prosperity of Slovenians is vividly shown in implementation of public programs such as: Blood Donation; First Aid; Disaster Preparedness and Disaster Response and in strong Social Welfare activities. Some figures that might illustrate the role of SRC in society better: yearly, more than 10% of the population receives assistance by Slovenian Red Cross; almost 100.000 Blood Donors help in saving numerous lives; more than 15.000 children spent healthy and worry free holidays by the sea in the Slovenian Red Cross Youth and Health Resort Debeli rtic. All this is possible due to more than 13.000 Red Cross volunteers, who yearly accomplish more than 500.000 hours of voluntary work. -
Side Events at the 32Nd International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent
Side events at the 32nd International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent 1. Action to combat impunity and improve accountability for victims and survivors of sexual and gender-based violence: practical tools and experiences Hosts: Canada, Japan, United Kingdom and United States of AmericaLanguages: English, French, Spanish, Arabic Where: room 18 When: Thursday 10 December 2015, 12:00-13:00 Description: Drawing on first-hand experience from sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV) experts who have directly investigated and prosecuted crimes and/or engaged in survivor-centred prevention strategies in the field, this event seeks to elicit practical tools and experiences across humanitarian settings, both conflict and non-conflict. With an interactive question and answer format that invites participation from the audience, different humanitarian and justice sector actors will have the opportunity to share lessons learned. More specifically, we will be looking at different tools, including: the Guidelines for Gender- based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Settings; Standard Operating Procedures for Prevention of and Response to SGBV; the International Protocol on the Documentation and Investigation of Sexual Violence in Conflict and initiatives such as Justice Rapid Response deployments; the _Safe from the Start_ initiative and the Roadmap for the Call to Action on Protection from Gender-based Violence in Emergencies. In doing so, we will consider the wider framework and multi-sectoral model. What accountability and justice mean and how to effectively deliver them across humanitarian and crisis situations will be questioned and examined. We will also touch on the achievements and challenges of prosecuting SGBV crimes in the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY). -
International Review of the Red Cross, November-December 1993
NOVEMBER - DECEMBER 1993 THIRTY-THIRD YEAR No. 297 PROPERTY OF U.S. ARMY THEJUDGEADVOCATEGENERA~SSCHOOl LIBRARY INTERNATIONAL • OF THE RED CROSS +c Published every two months by the International Committee of the Red Cross for the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS Mr. CORNELIO SOMMARUGA, Doctor of Laws of the University of Zurich, Doctor h.c. rer. pol. of Fribourg University (Switzerland), Doctor h.c. in International Relations of Minho University, Braga (Portugal), Doctor h.c. of Medicine of Bologna University (Italy), Doctor h.c. of Nice Sophia Antipolis University, Doctor h.c. of Seoul National University (Republic of Korea), President (member since 1986) Mr. PIERRE KELLER, Doctor of Philosophy in International Relations (Yale), banker, Vice President (1984) Mr. CLAUDIO CARATSCH, Bachelor of Arts, Vice-President (1990) Mr. ULRICH GAUDENZ MIDDENDORP, Doctor of Medicine, lecturer at the Faculty of Medicine of Zurich University, former head ofthe surgical department of the Cantonal Hospital, Winterthur (1973) Mr. MAURICE AUBERT, Doctor of Laws, Barrister, Vice-President from 1984 to 1991 (1979) Mr. DIETRICH SCHINDLER, Doctor of Laws, Honorary Professor at the University of Zurich (1961 1973) (1980) Mrs. RENEE GUISAN, General Secretary of the international [nstitut de la Vie. head of medico-social institutions in the Canton of Vaud, member of the International Association for Volunteer Effort (1986) Mrs. ANNE PETITPIERRE, Doctor of Laws, Barrister, Professor at the Law Faculty of the University of Geneva (1987) Mr. PAOLO BERNASCONI, Barrister, LL. L., lecturer in economic criminal law at the Universities of SI. Gallen and Zurich, former Public Prosecutor at Lugano, member of the Swiss Pro fuventute Foundation (1987) Mrs. -
Centenary Historians' Conference
Centenary Historians’ Conference media.ifrc.org/ifrc/speech/centenary-historians-conference/ Elhadj As Sy International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) Secretary General Date: Thursday, 13 June, 2019 Event: Centenary Historians’ Conference Location: Geneva, Switzerland Thank you David, and thank you all. Let me first of all welcome you to the IFRC, and thank you for putting in so much effort, thought, intellect and competence in looking at the history of our Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement. And particularly so in this year, when we take stock and reflect on our 100 years. There is a popular saying in my culture that if you don’t know where you’re going, you go back to where you came from. In my mother tongue it translates literally to ‘know your past to better shape your future’. And this saying is often used in that culture by what we call the Praise Singers. When soldiers were preparing for war, praise singers would remind them of their past, and the stories of their ancestors, to fill them with courage. So, we go back to our history and use it as a source of strength. But it’s not only used in the context of waging wars – it’s also used when leaders are faced with difficult decisions, in difficult times at family, community and national levels. The Praise Singers would take them back to history with stories of courage, forgiveness, reconciliation, care, support and humility: examples that serve as sources of inspiration and motivation to do nothing less than shape a better future. -
Emergency Appeal Operations Update Ukraine: Civil Unrest
Emergency appeal operations update Ukraine: Civil unrest Emergency appeal n° MDRUA007 GLIDE n° OT-2013-000151-UKR Operations update n° 3 Timeframe covered by this update: Date of issue: 21 November 2014 1 August 2014 – 31 October 2014 Emergency operation start date: End date: 31 March 2015 13 December 2013 Appeal budget: Appeal coverage: Total estimated Red Cross and Red Crescent CHF 2,294,724 60% response to date: CHF 1,253,512 (excluding DREF allocation) Disaster Relief Emergency Fund (DREF) allocated: CHF 317,790 N° of people being assisted: 16,000 Host National Society(ies) presence (n° of volunteers, staff, branches): 60,000 volunteers, 865 staff, 27 branches Red Cross Red Crescent Movement partners involved in the operation (both multilaterally and bilaterally): ICRC, American Red Cross, Red Crescent Society of Azerbaijan, Austrian Red Cross, Bulgarian Red Cross, Canadian Red Cross, Czech Red Cross, Danish Red Cross, German Red Cross, Estonian Red Cross, Finnish Red Cross, French Red Cross, Hungarian Red Cross, Icelandic Red Cross, Irish Red Cross, Italian Red Cross, Japanese Red Cross, Latvian Red Cross, Luxembourg RC, Monaco Red Cross, Netherlands Red Cross, Polish Red Cross, Russian Red Cross, Slovenian Red Cross, Slovak Red Cross and Spanish Red Cross. Other partner organizations actively involved in the operation: State authorities, local NGOs and UN agencies, DG ECHO, Canadian Government, German Government, Italian Government, Japanese Government, Netherlands Government Appeal history An appeal of CHF 1,375,100 had been launched -
3-Months Update (As of 30 Apr
REPORTING TIMEFRAME: 31/1-30/4/2020 COVID-19 Pandemic Next Update: 12 June, covering May 2020 3-Months Update (as of 30 Apr. 2020) Situation Update National Society Response Useful Links +4M confirmed cases globally 158/192 National Societies reporting engaged in: Health • Health helpdesk established to 138 143 135 streamline access to information, COVID-19 Global View map with the period in question highlighted including guidance, trainings, Q&A, and Health RCCE Institutional webinars Readiness Risk Communication, Community Number of National Societies engaged in selected activities: Engagement and Accountability Health: All material is on the Community 68 Screening and contact tracing Engagement Hub. For ease of reference, we 84 Psychosocial Support have compiled all resources in this table, 62 Clinical, paramedical, or homecare services which we update regularly. 72 Emergency social services for quarantined individuals Latest guide (to be translated in multiple Risk Communications & Community Engagement (RCCE): languages): 104 Misinformation management • How to include marginalized and 78 Community feedback mechanism vulnerable people in RCCE (Update #1) 58 Stigma prevention messaging EN Institutional Readiness: • Guidance for NS on safe and remote 92 Contingency Planning RCCE during COVID-19 EN 65 Business Continuity Planning • Interagency Tips for Engaging 109 Internal Risk Communications Communities during COVID-19 in Low- Resource Settings, Remotely and In- Click here for the detailed up-to-date information on the Person EN situation