DOCSLIB.ORG

3-Months Update (As of 30 Apr

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
3-Months Update (As of 30 Apr REPORTING TIMEFRAME: 31/1-30/4/2020 COVID-19 Pandemic Next Update: 12 June, covering May 2020 3-Months Update (as of 30 Apr. 2020) Situation Update National Society Response Useful Links +4M confirmed cases globally 158/192 National Societies reporting engaged in: Health • Health helpdesk established to 138 143 135 streamline access to information, COVID-19 Global View map with the period in question highlighted including guidance, trainings, Q&A, and Health RCCE Institutional webinars Readiness Risk Communication, Community Number of National Societies engaged in selected activities: Engagement and Accountability Health: All material is on the Community 68 Screening and contact tracing Engagement Hub. For ease of reference, we 84 Psychosocial Support have compiled all resources in this table, 62 Clinical, paramedical, or homecare services which we update regularly. 72 Emergency social services for quarantined individuals Latest guide (to be translated in multiple Risk Communications & Community Engagement (RCCE): languages): 104 Misinformation management • How to include marginalized and 78 Community feedback mechanism vulnerable people in RCCE (Update #1) 58 Stigma prevention messaging EN Institutional Readiness: • Guidance for NS on safe and remote 92 Contingency Planning RCCE during COVID-19 EN 65 Business Continuity Planning • Interagency Tips for Engaging 109 Internal Risk Communications Communities during COVID-19 in Low- Resource Settings, Remotely and In- Click here for the detailed up-to-date information on the Person EN situation and guidance documents on go.ifrc.org The latest WHO sit-reps are here Visualization and case numbers here and on Previous COVID-19 operations updates GO Platform National Society Field Reports are here 1 International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement appeals for 3.1 billion Swiss francs (3.19 billion US dollars) to curb COVID -19’s spread and assist world’s most vulnerable amid the pandemic The International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement is appealing for 3.1 billion Swiss francs (3.19 billion US dollars) to urgently scale up its global response to curb COVID-19’s rapid spread and assist the world’s most vulnerable people amid the pandemic. ▪ The IFRC is appealing for 1.9 billion Swiss francs (1.95 billion US dollars) to support National Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies in providing health care, water and sanitation, and mitigation against the socio-economic impacts for the most vulnerable people. The funds will also strengthen National Societies’ capacities as key local actors to deliver these critical services and programmes and ensure their volunteers/staff are protected and supported during this crisis. Out of the 1.9 billion Swiss francs, 450 million Swiss francs will be raised through the IFRC Secretariat in support of National Societies. ▪ The ICRC is appealing for 1.2 billion Swiss francs ($1.24 billion US dollars) to respond in places of conflict and violence, to support medical facilities and places of detention, curb the spread among and ensure medical access for displaced people and detainees, and to support National Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies in their response. This includes 366 million Swiss francs to support its critical and immediate response to COVID-19, and 828 million Swiss francs to support activities to address the broader impact of the pandemic. The ICRC seeks to address the most pressing needs, including ensuring access to clean water and sanitary living conditions; supporting the safe and dignified management of human remains; and enabling communities at risk to have access to life-saving services and information. The funding going via this revised Emergency Appeal covers both allocations to our member National Societies and funding to support the work of the IFRC Secretariat. It includes allocations to the five regions and to the Geneva Secretariat, as well as CHF 50 million to be managed as flexible funding to respond to the changing nature and focus of the pandemic. This will enable the IFRC network to be able to respond to developing hotspots, second waves and deepening social and economic impacts, that affect the lives and dignity of people and communities in specific countries or localities worldwide and will give the IFRC the capacity to anticipate and mitigate loss of life, livelihoods and dignity. 2 Contents Red Cross and Red Crescent activities by Region ............................................................................................................................... 4 Asia Pacific ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Emergency Appeal Support National Society 3-month picture .............................................................................................. 15 Africa ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 27 Emergency Appeal Support National Society 3-month picture .............................................................................................. 35 The Americas ................................................................................................................................................................................ 46 Emergency Appeal Support National Society 3-month picture .............................................................................................. 57 Europe .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 83 Emergency Appeal Support National Society 3-month picture .............................................................................................. 92 Middle East and North Africa ..................................................................................................................................................... 107 Emergency Appeal Support National Society 3-month picture ............................................................................................ 118 Global Support ................................................................................................................................................................................ 130 Health and Care .......................................................................................................................................................................... 130 Risk Communication and Community Engagement (RCCE) ........................................................................................................ 130 National Society Preparedness ................................................................................................................................................... 131 National Society Development in Emergencies .......................................................................................................................... 131 Business Continuity Planning and Security within IFRC Secretariat ........................................................................................... 131 Global Rapid Response ............................................................................................................................................................... 132 Contacts .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 133 Annex 1: Interim Financial Report .................................................................................................................................................. 134 3 Red Cross and Red Crescent activities by Region Asia Pacific Context Analysis On 31 December 2019, Wuhan city in China reported cases of pneumonia of unknown origin, which was later confirmed to be caused by a new coronavirus now known as SARS-CoV-2. The disease it causes is called COVID-19. COVID-19 continues to spread within Asia and Pacific and around the world. The Imperial College of London has estimated that in the absence of interventions, COVID-19 would have resulted in 7 billion infections and 40 million deaths globally within a year (1). The potential impact of COVID-19 on the world’s most vulnerable people already affected by displacement, conflict, natural disasters and climate change makes it the most urgent threat of our times. The Asia Pacific Region was the first to experience the outbreak. The virus has now spread to most countries in the Asia Pacific region and the world. IFRC is guided by the INFORM risk index developed by the Joint Research Centre of European Commission. This tool assesses the risk of countries from COVID-19, which would exceed the national capacity to respond to the crisis. The data from INFORM clearly shows the range of vulnerability across Asia and Pacific. This includes: • Countries affected by a history of conflict and other situations of violence (Afghanistan, East Timor, Myanmar, Pakistan and Papua New Guinea). • The small developing island states of the Pacific. • Countries host to large numbers of migrants, refugees and displaced people (especially Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Myanmar). 1 Imperial College COVID-19 Response Team, The Global Impact of COVID-19 and Strategies for Mitigation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • International Federation of the Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies
    International Federation of the Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies Monitoring and Evaluation Division Evaluation of support by the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement to the Chernobyl Humanitarian Assistance and Rehabilitation Programme (CHARP) Belarus, Russia, Ukraine 21.4.-1.5.2002 Brenda Corcoran, Consultant, Team Leader Terhi Heinasmaki, IFRC Health Department Toshiharu Makishima, Japanese Red Cross Evaluation of support by the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement to the Chernobyl Humanitarian Assistance and Rehabilitation Programme (CHARP), April 2002 Acknowledgements The Evaluation Team would like to thank all those who gave so generously of their time and expertise to give a comprehensive overview of the Chernobyl Humanitarian Assistance and Rehabilitation Programme (CHARP) programme. It is hoped that the findings of this evaluation will contribute to a strengthening of the programme. Dr Brenda Corcoran Team Leader April 2002 Dr Lelia Urkel, the Ultra sound doctor from Gomel Mobile Diagnostic Laboratory performing a thyroid ultra-sound examination 2 Evaluation of support by the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement to the Chernobyl Humanitarian Assistance and Rehabilitation Programme (CHARP), April 2002 Executive Summary The fourth evaluation of the support by the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement to the Chernobyl Humanitarian Assistance and Rehabilitation Programme (CHARP) took place between 21 April – 1 May 2002. Following the accidental explosion at the fourth reactor of the Chernobyl nuclear power plant in northern Ukraine in April 1986 millions of radionuclides were dispersed largely to the surrounding areas in Belarus, Russia and Ukraine. An estimated 160,000 people were evacuated from the most severely contaminated areas and over seven million people were affected by the accident.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategy 2010
    2005 Mid-Term Review Strategy 2010 © International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies Any part of this report may be cited, copied, translated into other languages or adapted to meet local needs without prior permission from the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, provided that the source is clearly stated. 2005 International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies PO Box 372 CH-1211 Geneva 19 Switzerland Telephone: +41 22 730 4222 Telefax: +41 22 733 0395 E-mail: [email protected] Web site: www.ifrc.org Contents Executive summary 2 Part one Report of the review team 1 Introduction 5 2 Objectives 5 3 Methodology 5 4 The findings 7 5 The changing context 8 6 Our place in the world 9 7 Vision, mission and values 10 8 The three strategic directions 12 9 Strategic direction 1: “Responsive to local vulnerability” 13 10 Strategic direction 1: “Focused on the areas where they can have greatest impact” 13 11 Core area 1: Promotion of the Movement’s fundamental principles and humanitarian values 15 12 Core area 2: Disaster Preparedness 15 13 Core area 3: Disaster Response 17 14 Core area 4: Health and care in the community 19 15 Strategic direction 2: Well-functioning National Societies 21 16 Strategic direction 3: Working together effectively 23 Part two Performance framework 1 Implementing Strategy 2010 25 2 Establishing a framework for achieving our goals 25 3 Describing the framework 25 4 Assumptions 26 5 The framework 26 Part three Case studies 29 Appendix 1 Participants in the review 41 2 Contributors to the review 42 3 List of documents consulted 47 Review team Sir Nicholas Young - British Red Cross Mrs Kristiina Kumpula - Finnish Red Cross Mrs Geri Lau - Singapore Red Cross Mr Alphonse Kalinganire - Rwanda Red Cross 28th April 2005 3 Executive summary 1 The mid-term review of Strategy 2010 was carried out pursuant to a resolution of the General Assembly in 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Advisory Service on International Humanitarian Law
    ADVISORY SERVICE ON INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW NATIONAL COMMITTEES AND SIMILAR BODIES ON INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW (25 January 2021) NATIONAL COMMITTEES AND SIMILAR BODIES ON INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW As of 25 January 2021 (total by region) EUROPE CENTRAL ASIA ASIA & PACIFIC THE AMERICAS AFRICA MIDDLE EAST Austria Kazakhstan Australia Argentina Algeria Bahrain Belarus Kyrgyzstan Bangladesh Bolivia Benin Egypt Belgium Tajikistan China (People’s Republic of) Brazil Botswana Iran (Islamic Republic of) Bulgaria Turkmenistan Cook Islands Canada Burkina Faso Iraq Croatia Indonesia Chile Cabo Verde Jordan Cyprus Japan Colombia Comoros Kuwait Czech Republic Kiribati Costa Rica Côte d'Ivoire Lebanon Denmark Malaysia Dominican Republic Eswatini Oman Finland Mongolia1* El Salvador Gambia Palestine France Nepal Ecuador Guinea-Bissau Qatar Georgia New Zealand Guatemala Kenya Saudi Arabia Germany Papua New Guinea Honduras Lesotho Syrian Arab Republic Greece Philippines Mexico Liberia United Arab Emirates Hungary Republic of Korea (the) Nicaragua Libya Yemen Iceland Samoa Panama Madagascar Ireland Sri Lanka Paraguay Malawi Italy (two committees) Vanuatu Peru Mauritius Lithuania Trinidad & Tobago Morocco Netherlands Uruguay Namibia Republic of North Macedonia Venezuela Niger Poland (two committees) Nigeria Republic of Moldova Senegal Romania Seychelles Slovakia Sierra Leone Slovenia South Africa Spain Sudan Sweden (two committees) Togo Switzerland Tunisia Ukraine Uganda United Kingdom Zambia Zimbabwe TOTAL: 30 TOTAL: 4 TOTAL: 17 TOTAL:
    [Show full text]
  • Lebanon /MENA: Civil Unrest
    Emergency Plan of Action Final Report Lebanon /MENA: Civil Unrest DREF operation Operation n° MDRLB008 Date of Issue: 09 July 2021 Glide number: OT-2019-000144-LBN Operation start date: 05 November 2019 Operation end date: 05 March 2020 National Societies: Lebanese Red Cross & Palestinian Red Operation budget: CHF 986,501 Crescent Society-Lebanon Branch Number of people affected: Nationwide Number of people assisted: 75,174 (60,260 + 14,500) through the Lebanese Red Cross (LRC) + (414) through Palestine Red Crescent Society- Lebanon branch (PRCS/L) Red Cross Red Crescent Movement partners currently actively involved in the operation: International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC), International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), German Red Cross (GRC), The Netherlands Red Cross, Norwegian Red Cross (NorCross), Danish Red Cross (DRC). Other partner organizations actively involved in the operation: Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF), Internal Security Forces (ISF), Ministry of Social Affairs (MoSA) The major donors and partners of the Disaster Relief Emergency Fund (DREF) include the Red Cross Societies and governments of Belgium, Britain, Canada, Denmark, German, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, New Zealand, Norway, Republic of Korea, Spain, Sweden, and Switzerland, as well as DG ECHO and Blizzard Entertainment, Mondelez International Foundation, and Fortive Corporation and other corporate and private donors. The IFRC, on behalf of the national society, would like to extend thanks to all for their generous contributions. A. SITUATION ANALYSIS Description of the disaster On 17 October 2019 -Thursday evening, nationwide protests began, and thousands of protesters filled the streets of major cities across Lebanon as part of nationwide demonstrations over deteriorating economic conditions and new austerity measures.
    [Show full text]
  • Swiss Red Cross COVID-19 Preparedness Profile(As of May 5
    Swiss Red Cross COVID-19 preparedness profile (as of May 5, 2020) Risk & Hazards Demography of mental health conditions, Psychiatric assessment, Psychological assessment, Psychological support INFORM COVID-19 Risk Index1 Population:7 8,516,543 provision in health facilities, Rehabilitation (substance abuse, physiotherapy etc.), Specialized psychological Population over 65:7 19% Hazard & Lack coping support, Training of community actors in basic Vulnerability Risk class psychological support, Training of health staff in basic Exposure capacity Income level:7 High income psychological support, Trauma treatment centres 3.7 4.3 0.0 Very Low 7 Urban (percentage): 74% 9 MHPSS target populations: INFORM COVID-19 risk rank: 189 of 191 countries Adolescents, Children, Families of missing persons, IFRC Operations (last 5 years) Migrants, People affected by violence, People affected Highlighted INFORM COVID-19 sub-components by war and armed conflict, People living with mental 11 DREF & Appeals health conditions, Survivors of sexual and gender-based Socio-Economic Vulnerability: 0.3 violence, Survivors of torture Epidemics Non-Epidemics Total Food Security: 1.3 Count 1 0 1 Other programming19, 20, 6, 21, 22, 23 Gender Based Violence (GBV): 1.8 CHF 5,709,720 0 5,709,720 People reached Movement (international & national): 2.4 All IFRC supported responses (last 5 yrs): - Program: Active: Direct: Indirect: Behaviour (awareness & trust)): 3.9 Epidemic/Pandemic: No - - Governance (effectiveness & corruption): 1.2 Swiss Red Cross Access to healthcare: 0.9 Mandate and resources13, 9, 6 CBS: No - - Health context NS Auxiliary role recognized: - Health (all program): No - - IDRL Law/Mechanism: - WASH: No - - Global Health Security Index:2 13 out of 195 Branches and warehouses: 80 DRR: Yes - - Global Health Security preparedness levels: Staff (% accidental insurance): 4,782 (100%) Social Inclusion: No - - Preventing pathogens: More prepared Volunteers (% a.
    [Show full text]
  • Red Cross in the EU
    A profile of the Red Cross in the EU Facts and Figures 2003 A Profile of the Red Cross in the European Union (EU) Facts and Figures In the EU, the Red Cross network represents over one million volunteers, employs 110,000 people and has over a thousand staff working internationally. Although each National Society belongs to a different social, political and cultural system and performs different tasks, all share the same basic unifying principles of the Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement. In the EU, the Red Cross is a major provider of social and emergency services and a partner in policy discussions pertaining to humanitarian issues both within and outside the EU. Since 1983, the National Red Cross Societies of the EU, together with the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, have established a representation and liaising office in Brussels, in order to facilitate cooperation between the EU National Societies and to bring the grass roots experience to the attention of the European institutions. This publication presents a profile of the 15 EU National Societies: their structure and main activities and their common interests within the EU context. It does not claim to be exhaustive. Realities, facts and figures change from day-to-day and we will update these profiles on a regular basis. The many challenges that lie ahead include the preoccupation of the Red Cross of how best to serve the most vulnerable in an ever changing environment; and the importance of its specific mandate and role within society being recognized by both national authorities and the EU Institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Swiss Red Cross International Cooperation Programme Report 2018
    Swiss Red Cross International Cooperation Programme Report 2018 25 April 2019 Swiss Red Cross Rainmattstrasse 10/P.O. Box CH-3001 Bern Phone +41 58 400 4111 www.redcross.ch Cover Page Role play in a health centre in Laos. Pregnant women attend an education session on the importance to give birth in a health centre or hospital. Cover photo © SRC All photos © divers Table of contents Synopsis 7 1. Institutional context 11 The International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement 11 Swiss Red Cross 11 Department International Cooperation 12 2. Global context 15 3. Programme results 2018 19 Health 20 Reproductive health 22 Nutrition 26 Disease control 30 Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) 33 Ageing and health 40 Blood safety 46 Eye Health 51 Disaster Risk Management 55 Emergency response 56 Recovery 60 Disaster risk reduction 64 Institutional preparedness 72 4. Learning process: Partnership and National Society Development 77 5. Public Affairs and awareness-raising in Switzerland 83 6. Finance 85 Financial overview 85 Financial results and SDC programme and project contribution 87 Programme Budget 2019 88 3 Annex 1: Result framework of the SRC Programme 2017–20 90 Annex 2: Standard outcome indicators measured in 2018 92 Annex 3: Beneficiary statistics 2018 94 Annex 4: Expenditures and SDC contribution 2018 by country 96 Annex 5: Deviations budget versus expenditures 2018 by country 98 Annex 6: Learnings 2018 – Evaluations, studies and reviews 99 Annex 7: Publications and presentations at conferences 2018 100 Annex 8: Country Summaries 102 Armenia
    [Show full text]
  • List of Participants
    Cavtat, DUBROVNIK CROATIA 17­19/ 03/ 2010 LIST OF PARTICIPANTS Member National Society Name Position ALBANIAN RED CROSS ZAMIR MUCA Secretary General SEIT MANCAKU Member of the Board ALGERIAN RED CRESCENT ANDORRAN RED CROSS DELFINA ARAUS FORGAS Member of the Board of Directors ALFONS CODINA PUJOL Volunteer in the Social Department CROATIAN RED CROSS NENAD JAVORNIK Executive President VESNA IVANČIĆ Vice President ZDRAVKO ŽIDOVEC Vice President DUBRAVKA HORVAT Deputy Executive President CHRISTOPHER LAMB Honorary Member BRANKA ARLOVIĆ Assistant Executive President NIKOLA JAGIĆ Assistant Executive President, Head of International Relations Department KATIJA DAMJANOVIĆ Assistant Executive President, Head of Executive President's Office LJERKA ČAČIĆ Assistant Executive President, Head of Youth Department SANJA PUPAČIĆ Assistant Executive President, Head of Migrations Department MAJA ANTONIĆ Officer in International Relations Department MARTINA HEĆIMOVIĆ Youth Representative EGYPTIAN RED CRESCENT SOCIETY MAMDOUH GABR Secretary General MOEMENA KAMEL Member of the Board YAHYA TOMOUM Consultant AMAL ABOELENIN Youth Representative 1 Cavtat, DUBROVNIK CROATIA 17­19/ 03/ 2010 Member National Society Name Position FRENCH RED CROSS JEAN‐FRANÇOIS MATTEI President ANTOINE PEIGNEY Head of International Relations and Operations VIRGINIE STREIT GUÉRINEL In charge of Relations with the Movement MARYAM RAFII Refugee's Programme Coordinator CAMILLE MORTREUX Youth Representative HELLENIC RED CROSS ANDREAS POTAMIANOS Member of the Board ANGELIKI KANATA Acting
    [Show full text]
  • Teaming up for Civil Protection Presentation
    Teaming Up for Civil Protection „Team CP“ Project overview Christian Kloyber ARC Headquarters Division: Operation, Innovation and Subsidiaries Headquaters Quick facts Grant Agreement No. 070401/2008/507760/SUB/A3 Project duration: 24 months (starting Feb 1, 2009) Project aim: - providing public information, education and awareness rising on civil protection to EU citizens - developing a “web 2.0” platform for communication, managing and training of convergent volunteers - minimise effects of emergencies on EU citizens and help EU citizens to protect themselves more effectively. EC Contribution: € 361.965 Financing rate: 75% Headquaters 2 ARC project team Coordinating Beneficiary Project supervisor Mr Gerry Foitik Project management team: Project coordinator Mr Christian Kloyber Project assistant Mrs Hedwig Milchram IT-Developer Mr Markus Hnatek Headquaters 3 Partners Associated Beneficiaries Media partner Media expert Austrian Broadcasting AB1 Martin Radjaby Corporation „Hitradio Ö3“ Partner countries Project managers German Red Cross AB2 Frank Joerres British Red Cross AB3 Moya Wood-Heath Polish Red Cross AB4 Katarzina Stepinska Headquaters 4 Project management I Structure Steering group - project controlling, permanent monitoring of goals and progress - composed of all project partners Project management team - project coordinator, project assistant - focal point for partners, EC, interested institutions Project team - coordinator, assistant, media expert and project managers of the 3 partner countries National work groups Headquaters
    [Show full text]
  • Qatar Red Crescent Society COVID-19 Preparedness Profile
    Qatar Red Crescent Society COVID-19 preparedness profile (as of May 5, 2020) Other programming19, 20, 6, 21, 22, 23 Risk & Hazards Population:7 2,781,677 INFORM COVID-19 Risk Index1 Population over 65:7 1% People reached 7 Hazard & Lack coping Income level: High income Program: Active: Direct: Indirect: Vulnerability Risk class Exposure capacity Urban (percentage):7 99% 5.0 3.4 3.2 Low Epidemic/Pandemic: No - - INFORM COVID-19 risk rank: 146 of 191 countries IFRC Operations (last 5 years) CBS: No - - DREF & Appeals11 Highlighted INFORM COVID-19 sub-components Health (all program): Yes 1,022,644 - Socio-Economic Vulnerability: 1.2 Epidemics Non-Epidemics Total WASH: No - - Count 0 0 0 Food Security: 1.0 CHF 0 0 0 DRR: Yes 519 - Gender Based Violence (GBV): 0.8 All IFRC supported responses (last 5 yrs): Social Inclusion: Yes 2,900 - - Movement (international & national): 2.4 Long-term Yes 14,985 - Behaviour (awareness & trust)): 2.1 Qatar Red Crescent Society programmes: First Aid: Yes (6,454 volunteers trained) Governance (effectiveness & corruption): 3.8 Mandate and resources13, 9, 6 Access to healthcare: 2.5 NS Auxiliary role recognized: - National Society capacity strenghtening and development processes24 Health context IDRL Law/Mechanism: - - Branches and warehouses: 1 Global Health Security Index:2 82 out of 195 Staff (% accidental insurance): 208 (0%) About: Country profiles Global Health Security preparedness levels: Volunteers (% a. insurance): 2,973 (0%) Preventing pathogens: More prepared The purpose of this document is to help outline National Society risk as well Youth (6-29 yrs) (% volunteers): 1,357 (46%) as capacities for preparedness, containment, and mitigation of COVID-19.
    [Show full text]
  • 091130 EZ Newsletter N10 AU
    10 September-November 2009 In the Spirit of Togetherness Contents The General Assembly of the International Federation has finished its work in Nairobi, and was followed by the Council of Delegates. Responding to Emergencies ……………… p.2 All General Assemblies are important, but I believe this one was more than usually so. In the first place, the General Assembly elected a new President: Tadateru - Azerbaijan Konoé, from the Japanese Red Cross, to follow Juan Manuel Suárez Del Toro - Georgia Rivero, who has served eight years. Then the Vice Presidents and Members of the - Turkey Governing Board were elected. - Italy - Greece The General Assembly adopted and discussed the implementation of Strategy 2020 - Ukraine – the document and strategy that will guide us, individually and collectively, in our humanitarian work over the coming decade. Meeting Global Agenda goals ……..p.3 - Vaccination campaign, Tajikistan - Pandemic preparedness - Organizational Development Platforms for Uniting Voices …………...p.4-6 - RCRC Istanbul Commitments Report - Towards Climate Change Conference - Anti-Trafficking network - Secretary General visit to Moscow - XII ERNA meeting - Economic Crisis Report for Europe - Kiev Partnership Conference External Relations ……...…p.7 - First IDRL Conference in Almaty - World Conference on Road Safety News from National Societies …………p.8-9 - A prize for inspiration Youth commission vice-chair Maiju Jolma presents to the 17th session of the General - Croatia Assembly. Nairobi, Kenya, 19 November 2009. Photo by Thomas Omondi/IFRC - Kyrgyzstan - Georgia Strategy 2020 building upon Strategy 2010 represents a mix of continuity and Volunteers’ Agenda..…….…p.10 innovation. It focuses on three “Strategic Goals”: save lives, protect livelihoods, and strengthen recovery from disasters and crises; enable healthy and safe living; Cash Transfer Programming in promote social inclusion and a culture of non-violence and peace.
    [Show full text]
  • Cooperation with National Societies
    COOPERATION Cooperation with National Societies International Committee of the Red Cross 19, avenue de la Paix 1202 Geneva, Switzerland T + 41 22 734 60 01 F + 41 22 733 20 57 E-mail: [email protected] www.icrc.org © ICRC, April 2007 Cover photos: Thierry Gassman/ICRC, Boris Heger/ICRC, Thomas Bertelsen/ICRC. Cooperation The basis for joint action Each year over 500,000 people are The Movement’s components are killed and more than 30 million flee separate, but inseparable, because their homes as a result of conflict. they are united by the emblems, the Armed violence, and in many cases Fundamental Principles and, most the refugees it produces, crosses importantly, by a common humani- borders. War and insecurity are tarian mission. The Movement brings associated with increasing migration, together a vast array of resources, the spread of HIV/AIDS and other making it the world’s largest humani- epidemics, the expansion of criminal tarian network and a unique and networks and the proliferation of independent force for humanitarian humanitarian disasters. The victims of action. conflict are not only soldiers but entire communities. Cooperation between the National Societies and the ICRC dates back to The International Red Cross and Red the very inception of the Movement. Crescent Movement is present in Today, it is one of the ICRC’s four main almost all of the world’s conflict zones. programme areas, together with pro tec­­ Together with the International tion, assistance and preventive action. Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) and the International Federation of The ICRC has a specific mandate and Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies a solid experience of action in conflict (International Federation), the situations.
    [Show full text]