Swiss Red Cross COVID-19 Preparedness Profile(As of May 5

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Swiss Red Cross COVID-19 Preparedness Profile(As of May 5 Swiss Red Cross COVID-19 preparedness profile (as of May 5, 2020) Risk & Hazards Demography of mental health conditions, Psychiatric assessment, Psychological assessment, Psychological support INFORM COVID-19 Risk Index1 Population:7 8,516,543 provision in health facilities, Rehabilitation (substance abuse, physiotherapy etc.), Specialized psychological Population over 65:7 19% Hazard & Lack coping support, Training of community actors in basic Vulnerability Risk class psychological support, Training of health staff in basic Exposure capacity Income level:7 High income psychological support, Trauma treatment centres 3.7 4.3 0.0 Very Low 7 Urban (percentage): 74% 9 MHPSS target populations: INFORM COVID-19 risk rank: 189 of 191 countries Adolescents, Children, Families of missing persons, IFRC Operations (last 5 years) Migrants, People affected by violence, People affected Highlighted INFORM COVID-19 sub-components by war and armed conflict, People living with mental 11 DREF & Appeals health conditions, Survivors of sexual and gender-based Socio-Economic Vulnerability: 0.3 violence, Survivors of torture Epidemics Non-Epidemics Total Food Security: 1.3 Count 1 0 1 Other programming19, 20, 6, 21, 22, 23 Gender Based Violence (GBV): 1.8 CHF 5,709,720 0 5,709,720 People reached Movement (international & national): 2.4 All IFRC supported responses (last 5 yrs): - Program: Active: Direct: Indirect: Behaviour (awareness & trust)): 3.9 Epidemic/Pandemic: No - - Governance (effectiveness & corruption): 1.2 Swiss Red Cross Access to healthcare: 0.9 Mandate and resources13, 9, 6 CBS: No - - Health context NS Auxiliary role recognized: - Health (all program): No - - IDRL Law/Mechanism: - WASH: No - - Global Health Security Index:2 13 out of 195 Branches and warehouses: 80 DRR: Yes - - Global Health Security preparedness levels: Staff (% accidental insurance): 4,782 (100%) Social Inclusion: No - - Preventing pathogens: More prepared Volunteers (% a. insurance): 53,474 (100%) Long-term Yes 533,109 - Early detection/reporting of epidemics: More prepared Youth (6-29 yrs) (% volunteers): - (-%) programmes: Responding & mitigating spread: Most prepared Continuity of care (MHPSS:14 First Aid: Yes (106,943 volunteers trained) Treat the sick & protect health workers: More prepared PSS support for Staff. PSS support for Volunteers. National Society capacity strenghtening Commitments (HR, funding & norms): More prepared Medical services15, 16 and development processes24 Risk/vulnerability to biological threats: Least at risk Pre-hospital care: - OCAC - Phase 1 Assessment (2015) ReadyScore:3 89 out of 100 Health Centre(s): - GHS process engagement4, 5 Hospital(s): - About: Country profiles Joint External Evaluation (JEE): Completed Higher Education: - The purpose of this document is to help outline National Society risk as well as capacities for preparedness, containment, and mitigation of COVID-19. National Action Plan for Health Security: - Programmes This document pulls existing IFRC and public information to inform about country-level risk and hazards, health context, Movement representation, Global Health Security Agenda (GHSA): Yes Community-based Health & First Aid National Society programs and services, and coordination mechanisms. Healthcare system capacity (per 1,000 population)8, 7 (CBHFA)17 INFORM and GHSI methodology and details on how to read the severity scales are available in the link below, in the links in the data 6.6 Hospital bed(s) (2020) Is CBHFA active: source section. No For more information on National Society capacity strengthening and 4 Physician(s) (2016) development processes, please contact: No CBHFA activities: 17 Nurse(s) and midwi(ves) (2016) • National Society Development (NSD) for Organisational Capacity - Assessment and Certification (OCAC) and Branch Organizational Capacity Assessment (BOCA) - Community healthcare worker(s) (-) No Health topics taught: • Disaster and Crisis Prevention, Response and Recovery (DCPRR) - for National Society Preparedness for Effective Response (PER) RCRC Movement Presence and cash preparedness Community Engagement & Accountability • Logistics team for Logistics assessments IFRC Region:9, 10 Europe (CEA)18 Data Sources IFRC CCST:9, 10 - HR Capacity: 1 INFORM COVID-19 Risk Index (v0.1.2) IFRC Country Office:9, 10 - 3-Day Training/ToT 2 Global Health Security Index (GHSI) (2019) 3 Prevent Epidemics ReadyScore (2019) 9, 10 Structure: 4 WHO Strategic Partnership for International Health Regulations (2005) IFRC Status agreement: - and Health Security (2020) - 5 Global Health Security Agenda (GHSA) (2020) IFRC Bank account:9, 10 - 6 IFRC Federation-wide databank and reporting system (2018) No Programs: 7 World Bank Open Data 9, 10 8 Imperial College London (ICL) and London School of Hygiene & Corresponding language: English / French - Tropical Medicine (LSHTM) 9 IFRC Disaster Law Database (IDRL) (2020) ICRC Presence:12 Yes Mental Health and Psychosocial Support 10 IFRC National Society Directory (2018) 14 11 IFRC Go (2020) (MHPSS) 12 International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) (2020) 13 IFRC COVID-19 Government Actions (2020) 14 IFRC MHPSS: Survey (2019) 15 Global Advisory Panel on Corporate Governance and Risk Partner National Societies (financial support):6 Number of volunteers trained in: Basic Psychosocial support (PSS): 30 Management of Blood Services in Red Cross and Red Crescent Danish Red Cross, Red Cross of Monaco, American Societies. Global Mapping - Red Cross / Red Crescent National Psychological First Aid (PFA): 15 Society involvement in country blood programs, 2018. Red Cross, The Canadian Red Cross Society, The 16 Business Continunity Planning/Medical capacity mapping (2020) Netherlands Red Cross, Austrian Red Cross Egyptian Number of highly skilled volunteers: 17 IFRC CBHFA: Survey (2019) 18 IFRC Community Engagement & Accountability: Map (2019) Red Crescent Society, Ethiopian Red Cross Society, Social Workers (0), Psychologist (1), Psychiatrist (1), 19 IFRC Community Epidemic and Pandemic Preparedness Program Armenian Red Cross Society, Bangladesh Red Crescent Community Healthcare Workers (CHWs) (0) 20 IFRC Community-based Surveillance (2020) 21 IFRC Global Safe Water Initiative (GWSI) Portal (2018) Society, The Red Cross Society of Bosnia and 13 current Psychosocial (PSS) activities: 22 IFRC Disaster Risk Reduction: Global mapping (2018) Herzegovina, Bulgarian Red Cross, Salvadorean Red 23 IFRC Social Inclusion capacity mapping (2019) Restoring Family Links, Caring for staff and volunteers, 24 IFRC National Society Development (2019) Cross Society, Red Cross Society of Georgia, Ghana Centres or gathering points, Information activities, Red Cross Society, Haiti Red Cross Society, Honduran Peer support, Psychoeducation, Psychological first Found incomplete, incorrect, or out of date Red Cross, Red Crescent Society of Kyrgyzstan, Lao aid, Rehabilitation, Self-care awareness, Sensitization information?Ideas on how to improve? Please share Red Cross, Lebanese Red Cross, Malawi Red Cross activities, Stress management activities, Volunteer your feedback. Society, Mali Red Cross, Red Cross of The Republic support, Trainings of North Macedonia, Nepal Red Cross Society, Pakistan Red Crescent, Philippine Red Cross, The Sudanese Red 13 current Mental Health (MH) activities: Crescent, South Sudan Red Cross, Syrian Arab Red Counselling, Family therapy, Group therapy and/or Crescent, Togolese Red Cross, Ukrainian Red Cross peer support groups, Hospitalization of people with Society, Vietnam Red Cross Society, Belarus Red Cross mental health conditions, Pharmacological management.
Recommended publications
  • International Federation of the Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies
    International Federation of the Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies Monitoring and Evaluation Division Evaluation of support by the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement to the Chernobyl Humanitarian Assistance and Rehabilitation Programme (CHARP) Belarus, Russia, Ukraine 21.4.-1.5.2002 Brenda Corcoran, Consultant, Team Leader Terhi Heinasmaki, IFRC Health Department Toshiharu Makishima, Japanese Red Cross Evaluation of support by the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement to the Chernobyl Humanitarian Assistance and Rehabilitation Programme (CHARP), April 2002 Acknowledgements The Evaluation Team would like to thank all those who gave so generously of their time and expertise to give a comprehensive overview of the Chernobyl Humanitarian Assistance and Rehabilitation Programme (CHARP) programme. It is hoped that the findings of this evaluation will contribute to a strengthening of the programme. Dr Brenda Corcoran Team Leader April 2002 Dr Lelia Urkel, the Ultra sound doctor from Gomel Mobile Diagnostic Laboratory performing a thyroid ultra-sound examination 2 Evaluation of support by the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement to the Chernobyl Humanitarian Assistance and Rehabilitation Programme (CHARP), April 2002 Executive Summary The fourth evaluation of the support by the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement to the Chernobyl Humanitarian Assistance and Rehabilitation Programme (CHARP) took place between 21 April – 1 May 2002. Following the accidental explosion at the fourth reactor of the Chernobyl nuclear power plant in northern Ukraine in April 1986 millions of radionuclides were dispersed largely to the surrounding areas in Belarus, Russia and Ukraine. An estimated 160,000 people were evacuated from the most severely contaminated areas and over seven million people were affected by the accident.
    [Show full text]
  • The Organisational Drivers and Barriers of Strategy Implementation Within a Non – Profit Organisation
    The Organisational Drivers and Barriers of Strategy Implementation within a Non – Profit Organisation A Case Study at the Netherlands Red Cross Master of Science Graduation Thesis Richard van Donselaar University of Twente May 21 st , 2012 Author R. van Donselaar (Richard) Student ID: s1063596 Master Business Administration [email protected] University Supervisors Dr. M. L. Ehrenhard (Michel) +31 (0) 53 489 4531 [email protected] Dr. ir. J. Kraaijenbrink (Jeroen) +31 (0) 53 489 5443 [email protected] Company Supervisor A. van Wesemael (Annemieke) +31 (0) 30 254 7050 [email protected] The Netherlands Red Cross Koningsweg 2 3582 GE Utrecht +31 (0) 30 252 0134 http://www.rodekruis.nl University of Twente Faculty: School of Management & Governance Drienerlolaan 5 7522 NB Enschede +31 (0) 53 489 9111 http://www.utwente.nl/onderwijs/mb/ Key words : Drivers*, barriers*, non – profit organisation, strategy implementation. * A wide variety of synonyms are available on page 11 of this research. Master’s Thesis | R. van Donselaar - 2 - Preface In front of you, you have my Master’s thesis, written for the study programme Business Administration. It has been the final part of my Master’s degree, wherein I have specialised in the field of Innovation & Entrepreneurship. The result of this Master thesis is one of the master programs the University’s School of Management and Governance (SMG) offers to its students. I would like to take the opportunity to thank all people that in some way have contributed to my research and this Master thesis. First of all I would like to thank my thesis supervisors.
    [Show full text]
  • Covid-19 Outbreak Operational Update # 20
    COVID-19 OUTBREAK REPORTING DATE: 23 October 2020 REPORTING TIMEFRAME: 1 August – 30 September 2020 OPERATIONAL UPDATE # 20 OPERATIONAL TIME FRAME: 31 JAN 2020 - 31 DEC 2021 CONTENTS Click to access sections GLOBAL OVERVIEW Operational Update COVID-19 and other emergencies ASIA PACIFIC REGION Regional update National Society response AFRICA REGION Regional update National Society response AMERICAS REGION Regional update National Society response EUROPE REGION Regional update National Society response MIDDLE EAST & NORTH AFRICA REGION Regional update National Society response Situation Update National Society Useful Links Response 41.104.000 confirmed cases globally reported to WHO as 23 October 2020 Rapid acceleration in transmission, with 152 National Societies reporting approximately 2.2 million new cases per via public COVID-19 Field Reports week. as submitted on the GO Platform. Technical Guidance - Compendium The Red Cross And Red Crescent Movement Resource Compendium has links to resources Health Help Desk 152 145 147 Sustaining Addressing Strengthening • Business Continuity Planning Help Desk Health and Socio- National • Cash Help Desk WASH economic Societies Impact • Community Engagement Hub COVID-19 Global View map shows new cases per population. Larger map in annex. *Breakdown of pillars in annex and on GO 5 May – 22 October • Livelihoods Help Desk • IFRC Reference Centre for Psychosocial Support Funding** GO Platform 450,000,000 CHF Required • National Society Resources and Guidance by a number of topics National Society Field Reports and Emergency pages can be found on GO platform. The latest WHO sit-reps are here and visualisations at WHO and on GO Platform. Click here for the detailed up-to-date information on the situation, analysis, RCRC Movement actions, documents and additional information available on ** Funding gap calculated after factoring in soft and hard pledges.
    [Show full text]
  • Heatwave Guide for Cities
    HEATWAVE GUIDE FOR CITIES HEATWAVE GUIDE FOR CITIES 2 HEATWAVE GUIDE FOR CITIES Heatwaves are deadly and their impacts are on the rise globally due to climate change. But this is not inevitable; it is up to us to prevent this public-health crisis from impacting our neighbours, family members and friends. Every year, heatwaves claim the lives of infants, older people, and people with chronic health conditions. The urban poor frequently bear the brunt of this silent emergency. In addition to threatening the lives and health of vulnerable popula- tions, heatwaves have cascading impacts in other areas of society, such as reduced economic output, strained health systems and rolling power outages. The Lancet estimates that in 2017, 153 billion hours of work were lost due to extreme heat. What is unacceptable about this silent emergency is that simple, low-cost actions such as ordinary citizens checking on vulnerable neighbours can save lives during episodes of extreme heat. As many as 5 billion people live in areas of the world where heatwaves can be forecast before they happen, which means we have time to take early action to save lives. To address the existing need and reduce future risks posed by climate change, we need collective global action to scale up early warning systems for heat. People living in urban areas are amongst the hardest hit when a heatwave occurs because these are hotter than the surrounding countryside. Along with climate change, urbanization is one of the most transformative trends of this century and the last. Over half the world now lives in urban areas and this is projected to increase to two-thirds by 2050.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategy 2010
    2005 Mid-Term Review Strategy 2010 © International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies Any part of this report may be cited, copied, translated into other languages or adapted to meet local needs without prior permission from the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, provided that the source is clearly stated. 2005 International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies PO Box 372 CH-1211 Geneva 19 Switzerland Telephone: +41 22 730 4222 Telefax: +41 22 733 0395 E-mail: [email protected] Web site: www.ifrc.org Contents Executive summary 2 Part one Report of the review team 1 Introduction 5 2 Objectives 5 3 Methodology 5 4 The findings 7 5 The changing context 8 6 Our place in the world 9 7 Vision, mission and values 10 8 The three strategic directions 12 9 Strategic direction 1: “Responsive to local vulnerability” 13 10 Strategic direction 1: “Focused on the areas where they can have greatest impact” 13 11 Core area 1: Promotion of the Movement’s fundamental principles and humanitarian values 15 12 Core area 2: Disaster Preparedness 15 13 Core area 3: Disaster Response 17 14 Core area 4: Health and care in the community 19 15 Strategic direction 2: Well-functioning National Societies 21 16 Strategic direction 3: Working together effectively 23 Part two Performance framework 1 Implementing Strategy 2010 25 2 Establishing a framework for achieving our goals 25 3 Describing the framework 25 4 Assumptions 26 5 The framework 26 Part three Case studies 29 Appendix 1 Participants in the review 41 2 Contributors to the review 42 3 List of documents consulted 47 Review team Sir Nicholas Young - British Red Cross Mrs Kristiina Kumpula - Finnish Red Cross Mrs Geri Lau - Singapore Red Cross Mr Alphonse Kalinganire - Rwanda Red Cross 28th April 2005 3 Executive summary 1 The mid-term review of Strategy 2010 was carried out pursuant to a resolution of the General Assembly in 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Philippine Red Cross COVID-19 Operation Report As of May 13,2020
    Philippine Red Cross COVID-19 Operation Report as of May 13,2020 Situational Overview On 31 December 2019, Wuhan city in China reported cases of pneumonia of unknown origin, which was later confirmed to be caused by a new coronavirus now known as COVID-19. COVID-19 continues to spread, affecting 208 countries across all continents of the world. On 30 January 2020, World Health Organization (WHO) declared the COVID-19 outbreak a public health event of international concern. This is a call to action for all countries to be prepared for containment, including active surveillance, early detection, isolation, and case management, contact tracing and prevention of further spread. On 11 March 2020, following concerns about the level of spread and severity, WHO assessed that COVID-19 now characterized as a pandemic. According to the WHO as of May 13, 2020, a total of 4,139,794 cases and 285,328 deaths had been reported worldwide. In Philippines, on 20 January 2020, the first case of COVID-19 was reported in a 38-year-old female, Chinese national, who subsequently recovered. An immediate investigation and contact tracing were conducted. Her companion, a 44-year-old, male, Chinese national later also tested positive for COVID-19 and died on 1 February 2020. On 5 February 2020, the Department of Health (DoH) confirmed a third case in a 60-year-old Chinese woman who came from Hong Kong to Cebu on January 20 before she travelled to Bohol. After a month without new cases, on 6 March 2020, the DOH announced two cases consisting of two Filipinos.
    [Show full text]
  • Lebanon /MENA: Civil Unrest
    Emergency Plan of Action Final Report Lebanon /MENA: Civil Unrest DREF operation Operation n° MDRLB008 Date of Issue: 09 July 2021 Glide number: OT-2019-000144-LBN Operation start date: 05 November 2019 Operation end date: 05 March 2020 National Societies: Lebanese Red Cross & Palestinian Red Operation budget: CHF 986,501 Crescent Society-Lebanon Branch Number of people affected: Nationwide Number of people assisted: 75,174 (60,260 + 14,500) through the Lebanese Red Cross (LRC) + (414) through Palestine Red Crescent Society- Lebanon branch (PRCS/L) Red Cross Red Crescent Movement partners currently actively involved in the operation: International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC), International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), German Red Cross (GRC), The Netherlands Red Cross, Norwegian Red Cross (NorCross), Danish Red Cross (DRC). Other partner organizations actively involved in the operation: Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF), Internal Security Forces (ISF), Ministry of Social Affairs (MoSA) The major donors and partners of the Disaster Relief Emergency Fund (DREF) include the Red Cross Societies and governments of Belgium, Britain, Canada, Denmark, German, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, New Zealand, Norway, Republic of Korea, Spain, Sweden, and Switzerland, as well as DG ECHO and Blizzard Entertainment, Mondelez International Foundation, and Fortive Corporation and other corporate and private donors. The IFRC, on behalf of the national society, would like to extend thanks to all for their generous contributions. A. SITUATION ANALYSIS Description of the disaster On 17 October 2019 -Thursday evening, nationwide protests began, and thousands of protesters filled the streets of major cities across Lebanon as part of nationwide demonstrations over deteriorating economic conditions and new austerity measures.
    [Show full text]
  • The Austrian Red Cross
    THE AUSTRIAN RED CROSS WWW.REDCROSS.AT | 2018 THE RED CROSS. A WORLDWIDE MOVEMENT. Until today the worldwide Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement has grown considerably. There are 191 national societies – just like the Austrian Red Cross. Millions of people in 191 countries work for the movement! . International Committee of the Red Cross . International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies . National Societies of the Red Cross and Red Crescent WWW.REDCROSS.AT | 2018 2 MISSION STATEMENT OF THE RED CROSS AND RED CRESCENT MOVEMENT „to improve the lives of vulnerable people by mobilizing the power of humanity“ WWW.REDCROSS.AT | 2018 3 SEVEN FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES The seven Fundamental Principles represent the system of values of the international Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement. Humanity People caring for people. Impartiality Aid doesn‘t differentiate. Neutrality Humanitarian initiatives need trust. Independence Our principles are maintained through self-determination. Voluntary Service True aid must be free of self-interest. Unity Only one in any given country, open to all. Universality Humanitarian values are global. WWW.REDCROSS.AT | 2018 4 THE RED CROSS – A SYMBOL, THE WHOLE WORLD TRUSTS IN Protected to be able to protect. The Red Cross and Red Crescent protect humanitarian and medical staff, buildings and equipment of the national red cross and red crescent societies as well as the medical corps in times of military conflicts. Since 2006 the Red Crystal also has been recognized. WWW.REDCROSS.AT | 2018 5 AUSTRIAN SOCIETY
    [Show full text]
  • Italy: Earthquake Update N° 2 27 April 2009
    DREF operation n° MDRIT001 GLIDE EQ-2009-000072-ITA Italy: Earthquake Update n° 2 27 April 2009 The International Federation’s Disaster Relief Emergency Fund (DREF) is a source of un-earmarked money created by the Federation in 1985 to ensure that immediate financial support is available for Red Cross and Red Crescent response to emergencies. The DREF is a vital part of the International Federation’s disaster response system and increases the ability of national societies to respond to disasters. Period covered by this update: 9 April to 23 April 2009. CHF 700,000 (USD 613,944 or EUR 460,808) has been allocated from the International Federation’s Disaster Relief Emergency Fund (DREF) to support the Italian Red Cross in delivering immediate assistance to 15,000 beneficiaries and to replenish emergency stocks. This DREF operation is an opportunity for Partner National Societies and donors to support the Italian Red Cross in its ongoing operations, and un-earmarked contributions to replenish the DREF are therefore highly encouraged. Summary: A strong earthquake measuring 6.3 on the Richter scale hit central Italy on 6 April 2009. Some 290 people have been killed, around 1,000 Photo: Italian Red Cross operational centre injured and 48,000 made homeless. Several strong aftershocks hit the region in the following week. The Italian Red Cross is supporting the affected population with food and non- food items as well as psychological support in order to overcome the most urgent needs. This operation is expected to be implemented over a period of three months, and will therefore be completed by 7 July, 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement Family Links Network Code of Conduct on Data Protection
    International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement Family Links Network Code of Conduct on Data Protection Version 1.0 November 2015 International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement Family Links Network Code of Conduct _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Foreword This Code of Conduct (CoC) was drafted by a working group composed of representatives of the Austrian Red Cross (Claire Schocher-Döring), Belgian Red Cross (Flanders) (Axel Vande Veegaete, Nadia Terweduwe), British Red Cross (Mark Baynham and Emily Knox), German Red Cross (Jutta Hermanns), Red Cross EU Office (Olivier Jenard), International Committee of the Red Cross (Romain Bircher, Massimo Marelli, Katja Gysin) and International Federation of Red Cross and Red Cross Societies (Christopher Rassi) (Working Group). Several other representatives of these organizations also took part in the drafting, discussions, and meetings, making important contributions. The Working Group began discussions on this project in late 2013, and has had several working meetings in Mechelen (April 2014), Brussels (July 2014), Vienna (September 2014), Sofia (November 2014), and London (January 2015), in addition to multiple phone conferences and e-mail exchanges. The CoC was adopted within the Working Group by consensus, incorporating feedback received from many National Societies. The CoC was deemed necessary due to (1) the many actors of the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement (Movement) operating in the Family Links Network , and the need to transfer data within the Movement and to other actors, and (2) the changing regulatory environment in Europe and worldwide with regard to data protection laws and standards. The CoC sets out the minimum principles, commitments, and procedures that members of the Movement must comply with when processing data within the Family Links Network.
    [Show full text]
  • International Review of the Red Cross, March 1963, Third Year
    MARCH 1963-THIRD YEAR-No. 24 International Review of the Red Cross CENTENARY YEAR OF TllE RED CROSS 1963 PftOPERTY OF u.s. ARMY me JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAl'S SCHOOL LI8RAAY GENEVA INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS FOUNDED IN 1863 INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS LEOPOLD BOISSIER, Doctor of Laws, HonoraryProfessor at the Universityof Geneva, for­ mer Secretary-General to the Inter-Parliamentary Union, President (member since 1946) JACQUES CHENEVIERE, Hon. Doctor of Literature, Honorary Vice-President (1919) CARL]. BURCKHARDT, Doctor of Philosophy, former Swiss Minister to France (1933) MARTIN BODMER, Hon. Doctor of Philo~ophy, Vice-President (1940) ERNEST GLOOR, Doctor (1945) PAUL RUEGGER, former Swiss Minister to Italy and the United Kingdom, Member of the Permanent Court of Arbitration (1948) RODOLFO OLGIATI, Hon. Doctor of Medicine, former Director of the Don Suisse (1949) MARGUERITE VAN BERCHEM, former Head of Section, Central Prisoners of War Agency (1951) FREDERIC SIORDET, Lawyer, Counsellor of the International Committee of the Red Cross from 1943 to 1951, Vice-President (1951) GUILLAUME BORDIER, Certificated Engineer E.P.F., M.B.A. Harvard, Banker (1955) ADOLPHE FRANCESCHETTI, Doctor of Medicine, Professor of clinical ophthalmology at Geneva University (1958) HANS BACHMANN, Doctor of Laws, Assistant Secretary-General to the International Committee of the Red Cross from 1944 to 1946 (1958) JACQUES FREYMOND, Doctor of Literature, Director of the Graduate Institute of International Studies, Professor at the University of Geneva (1959) DIETRICH SCHINDLER, Doctor of Laws (1961) SAMUEL GONARD, former Colonel Commanding an Army Corps, former Professor at the Federal Polytechnical School (1961) HANS MEULI, Doctor of Medicine, Brigade Colonel, former Director of the Swiss Army Medical Service (1961) MARJORIE DUVILLARD, Directress of" Le Bon Secours" Nursing School (1961) MAX PETITPIERRE, Doctor of Laws, former President of the Swiss Confederation (1961) Honorary membeT~ : Miss LUCIE ODIER, Honorary Vice-President.
    [Show full text]
  • Swiss Red Cross International Cooperation Programme Report 2018
    Swiss Red Cross International Cooperation Programme Report 2018 25 April 2019 Swiss Red Cross Rainmattstrasse 10/P.O. Box CH-3001 Bern Phone +41 58 400 4111 www.redcross.ch Cover Page Role play in a health centre in Laos. Pregnant women attend an education session on the importance to give birth in a health centre or hospital. Cover photo © SRC All photos © divers Table of contents Synopsis 7 1. Institutional context 11 The International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement 11 Swiss Red Cross 11 Department International Cooperation 12 2. Global context 15 3. Programme results 2018 19 Health 20 Reproductive health 22 Nutrition 26 Disease control 30 Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) 33 Ageing and health 40 Blood safety 46 Eye Health 51 Disaster Risk Management 55 Emergency response 56 Recovery 60 Disaster risk reduction 64 Institutional preparedness 72 4. Learning process: Partnership and National Society Development 77 5. Public Affairs and awareness-raising in Switzerland 83 6. Finance 85 Financial overview 85 Financial results and SDC programme and project contribution 87 Programme Budget 2019 88 3 Annex 1: Result framework of the SRC Programme 2017–20 90 Annex 2: Standard outcome indicators measured in 2018 92 Annex 3: Beneficiary statistics 2018 94 Annex 4: Expenditures and SDC contribution 2018 by country 96 Annex 5: Deviations budget versus expenditures 2018 by country 98 Annex 6: Learnings 2018 – Evaluations, studies and reviews 99 Annex 7: Publications and presentations at conferences 2018 100 Annex 8: Country Summaries 102 Armenia
    [Show full text]