DOCSLIB.ORG

German Cameroon

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
German Cameroon chapter 7 German Cameroon 1 Introduction After the unification of Germany in 1871, a decade passed before Germany’s im- perial ambitions and its quest for territorial expansion became a matter of public debate. In the 1880s, the call for colonial activities became stronger as German private trading companies applied to their government for an official mandate to acquire and rule African territory. Despite his initial reluctance to become in- volved in colonial affairs, Chancellor Bismarck yielded to the twin temptation of expanding Germany’s international power and creating an overseas empire. The Germans acquired their first territories in the tropical and rivery part of Sub- Saharan Africa. The colonial protectorate of Deutsches Kamerun was established on the basis of bilateral treaties between Germany and African native rulers. The central issue of this chapter is the German acquisition of Africa in par- ticular Cameroonian, territory by way of treaties in the late nineteenth century. The aim will be to establish the historical context in which these treaties were negotiated and concluded and to analyse the treaty texts. The textual analysis will address property and sovereignty arrangements in the treaties transfer- ring territorial sovereignty from the Cameroonian rulers to Germany. Once the treaty-making context has been outlined, the next question to be addressed is how existing sovereignty and property rights fared after the treaties had been signed. Specifically, the chapter will first discuss the historical context of the German colonial venture in Africa, more specifically Cameroon (§2). Second, protectorate treaties concluded between Germany and Cameroonian polities will be analysed to find out whether and how sovereign and property rights were mentioned (§3). Third, the chapter will examine how Germany established its control over the territory by means of legislation after the treaties had been concluded (§4). Fourth, the interpretation and execution of the treaties will be explored by discussing German conduct and the reactions of native inhabit- ants (§5). The chapter will conclude by making some observations anticipating the question whether Germany’s acquisition of Cameroon was legal (§6). 2 Historical Background Bismarck dominated the internal and foreign policies of the new German Em- pire from its foundation in 1871 to the early 1890s. He intended to transform Mieke van der Linden - 9789004321199 © Mieke van der Linden, 2017 | doi 10.1163/9789004321199_008Downloaded from Brill.com09/26/2021 12:17:16PM This is an open access chapter distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. via free access German Cameroon 175 Germany into one of the greatest military powers on the European continent. In terms of imperial expansion, however, Germany was often considered to lag behind. In the early 1870s, Germany was neither prepared nor able to acquire overseas territories. It was fully occupied with internal affairs and was there- fore not in a position to match the colonial aspirations of other European pow- ers.1 The unification of Germany, however, not only redrew the geographical map of Europe, it also betrayed a strong nationalistic mindset, which was a key driver of Germany’s imperial expansion in the 1880s.2 Initially, Bismarck had no need for colonies and even labelled colonial adventures as irrational activi- ties.3 In the 1870s, Bismarck’s diplomacy4 was trained on a calculated strategy 1 For an extensive overview of the pressing internal affairs occupying German politics in the last three decades of the nineteenth century, see H.-U. Wehler, Das Deutsche Kaiserreich 1871–1918 (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht, 1994). See also W.J. Mommsen, Imperial Germany 1867–1918: Politics, Culture and Society in an Authoritarian State (London: Arnold, 1997). 2 For an extensive overview of the general motives of the German colonization mission, see A. Bernard, ‘Germany’s Colonial Aims,’ Journal of the Royal African Society, 16 (1917), 306–313; T. Büttner, Geschichte Afrikas. Von den Anfängen bis zur Gegenwart, vol. ii (Berlin: Akademie, 1976); F.R. Cana, ‘German Aims in Africa,’ Journal of the Royal African Society, 14 (1915), 355– 365; Förster, Mommsen and Robinson, Bismarck, Europe and Africa; K. Hausen, Deutsche Kolonialherrschaft in Afrika. Wirtschaftsinteressen und Kolonialverwaltung in Kamerun vor 1914 (Zurich, Freiburg: Atlantis, 1970); P. Heine and U. van der Heyden (eds.), Festschrift zum 60. Geburtstag von Peter Sebald. Studien zur Geschichte des deutschen Kolonialismus in Afri- ka (Pfaffenweiler: Centaurus, 1995); G. Knopp, Das Weltreich der Deutschen. Von kolonialen Träumen, Kriegen und Abenteuern (München: Pendo, 2010); Mommsen, Imperial Germany; H. Schnee, Kolonialmacht Deutschland (Berlin: Hillger, 1940); H. Sippel, ‘Aspects of Colonial Land Law in German East Africa: German East Africa Company, Crown Land Ordinance, Eu- ropean Plantations and Reserved Areas for Africans,’ in: R. Debusmann and S. Arnold (eds.), Land Law and Land Ownership in Africa. Case Studies from Colonial and Contemporary Cam- eroon and Tanzania (Bayreuth: Bayreuth African Studies, 1996), 3–38; H. Stoecker (ed.), Ger- man Imperialism in Africa. From the Beginnings until the Second World War (London: Hurst, 1977); H. Zache, Das Deutsche Kolonialbuch (Berlin, Leipzig: Andermann, 1926) and H. Zache, Imperialismus und Kolonialpolitik (Berlin: Kolonialdruckerei, 1927). 3 Wesseling, Verdeel en Heers, 137. Bismarck put forward four different reasons why colonies would be an absurd liability for the Reich, which are formulated by Pakenham in the form of four questions: ‘First, would new colonies pay their own way? … Second, was public opinion ready for them? … Third, how could the German navy defend such colonies? … Fourth, what about the damage to his own diplomacy?’ Pakenham, Scramble for Africa, 203–204. 4 On the developments in the diplomatic field and the role of Germany, see A. Green, Fatherlands: State-Building and Nationhood in Nineteenth-Century Germany (Cambridge University Press, 2001); H. Kissinger, Diplomacy (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1994), 103–200; G. Knopp, Das Weltreich der Deutschen. Von kolonialen Träumen, Kriegen und Aben- teuern (München: Pendo, 2010); Mommsen, Imperial Germany; W. Mulligan, ‘Restrained Mieke van der Linden - 9789004321199 Downloaded from Brill.com09/26/2021 12:17:16PM via free access <UN> 176 chapter 7 of diverting the attention and energies of the major European powers away from the European continent to overseas territories.5 Directing his attentions to sustaining the European balance of power and to strengthening Germany’s position within Europe, Bismarck did not see colonization as the way forward. First, Germany had no military infrastructure and means to acquire and protect foreign territory, and Bismarck was loath to make the necessary investments. Second, Germany had no trading companies that were capable of exploiting the colonies on a large scale and Bismarck did not desire to facilitate them. Germany was not in need of resources. In fact, overproduction was already causing many problems on the European mainland. Third, the financial bur- den of acquiring and especially ruling colonies curbed public enthusiasm for a colonial venture in Africa. Or, in the words of Bismarck: ‘Wir sind noch nicht reich genug, um uns den Luxus von Kolonien leisten zu können.’6 Bismarck’s perspective on looking after German national interests in Germany’s relations with other European States was continental; Bismarck’s ‘map of Africa was in Europe.’7 However, in the years 1884–1885 Bismarck changed his mind,8 as he came under pressure of the nationalist movements within parliament,9 the trading companies lobby and internal social problems. An accumulation of political, economic and social considerations were the incentive for Bismarck to par- ticipate in the quest for African territory. Mary Townsend eloquently describes this mixture of motives, which convinced German politicians, and Bismarck in particular, of the need for territorial expansion: ‘[A]n enhanced national consciousness expressed by Germans both at home and abroad; a swollen purse requiring objects for expenditure, and then a depleted purse in need of large dividends regardless of risk; and abnormally inflated production demanding outlet markets; mushroom industries clamouring for raw materials; an Competition: International Relations,’ in: S. Berger (ed.), A Companion to Nineteenth-Century Europe, 1789–1914 (Malden, Oxford, Carlton: Blackwell, 2006), 401–422; J.L. Richardson, Crisis Diplomacy. The Great Powers since the Mid-Nineteenth Century (Cambridge University Press, 1994) and Wehler, Deutsche Kaiserreich. 5 W.J. Mommsen, ‘Bismarck, the Concert of Europe, and the Future of West Africa, 1883–1885,’ in: S. Förster, W.J. Mommsen and R. Robinson (eds.), Bismarck, Europe and Africa (Oxford University Press, 1988), 153. 6 L. Gall, Bismarck: Der weiße Revolutionair (Frankfurt: Propyläen, 1980), 617. 7 This remark was made by Bismarck to a German traveller in Africa on 5 December 1888, as quoted in Gall, Bismarck, 623. 8 See Wesseling, Verdeel en Heers, 142–144. 9 See P. Grupp, Deutschland, Frankreich und die Kolonien (Tübingen: Mohr, 1980), 47–85 and 86–211. Mieke van der Linden - 9789004321199 Downloaded from Brill.com09/26/2021 12:17:16PM via free access <UN> German Cameroon 177 overstocked labor market using emigration as a safety-value; and finally, an ever growing navy promising protection to overseas ventures and investments.’10
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Territoriality, Sovereignty, and Violence in German South-West Africa
    Bard College Bard Digital Commons Senior Projects Spring 2018 Bard Undergraduate Senior Projects Spring 2018 Colonial Control and Power through the Law: Territoriality, Sovereignty, and Violence in German South-West Africa Caleb Joseph Cumberland Bard College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.bard.edu/senproj_s2018 Part of the African History Commons, Indigenous Studies Commons, and the Legal History Commons This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. Recommended Citation Cumberland, Caleb Joseph, "Colonial Control and Power through the Law: Territoriality, Sovereignty, and Violence in German South-West Africa" (2018). Senior Projects Spring 2018. 249. https://digitalcommons.bard.edu/senproj_s2018/249 This Open Access work is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been provided to you by Bard College's Stevenson Library with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this work in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights- holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Colonial Control and Power through the Law: Territoriality, Sovereignty, and Violence in German South-West Africa Senior Project Submitted to The Division of Social Studies of Bard College by Caleb Joseph Cumberland Annandale-on-Hudson, New York May 2018 Acknowledgments I would like to extend my gratitude to my senior project advisor, Professor Drew Thompson, as without his guidance I would not have been able to complete such a project.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Conservation and Management Practices in Cameroon: Case Study of Bimbia-Bonadikombo Community Forest and Takamanda National Park
    Forest Conservation and Management Practices in Cameroon: Case Study of Bimbia-Bonadikombo Community Forest and Takamanda National Park A thesis approved by the Faculty of Environment and Natural Sciences at the Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the award of the academic degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) in Environmental Sciences By Regina Edawa Nyambi Anaka Master of Science From Momo-Division, Northwest Region, Cameroon Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. (NMU Dnepropetrovsk) Michael Schmidt Supervisor: Prof. Dr.iur. Eike Albrecht th Day of the oral examination: 25 October 2018 DECLARATION I hereby declare that this dissertation is the result of my original research carried out at the Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Germany within the framework of the International Ph.D. (Doctor of Philosophy) program in Environmental and Resources Management. I hereby admit that this dissertation has never been submitted in whole or in part for a degree at Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Germany or elsewhere. References to other people’s research have been duly cited and acknowledged accordingly in this work. ___________________________________ Regina Edawa Nyambi Anaka, Date of Signature i DEDICATION I dedicate this dissertation to my kids; Anongka Anaka, Mandi Anaka and David Anaka, and to my beloved husband Divine Asoh Anaka, who have been a constant source of inspiration and support during the most challenging moments of my Ph.D. studies. I also dedicate this work to my mentor and late brother Prof. Dr. Phillipe Nyambi (RIP) for his moral and financial support throughout my academic career.
    [Show full text]
  • The United States Versus Germany (1891-1910)
    Illinois Wesleyan University Digital Commons @ IWU Honors Projects History Department 5-1995 Quest for Empire: The United States Versus Germany (1891-1910) Jennifer L. Cutsforth '95 Illinois Wesleyan University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/history_honproj Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Cutsforth '95, Jennifer L., "Quest for Empire: The United States Versus Germany (1891-1910)" (1995). Honors Projects. 28. https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/history_honproj/28 This Article is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Commons @ IWU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this material in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This material has been accepted for inclusion by faculty at Illinois Wesleyan University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ©Copyright is owned by the author of this document. ~lAY 12 1991 Quest For Empi re: The Uni ted states Versus Germany (1891 - 1910) Jenn1fer L. Cutsforth Senlor Research Honors Project -- Hlstory May 1995 • Quest for Emp1re: The Un1ted states versus Germany Part I: 1891 - 1900 German battleships threaten American victory at Man'ila! United States refuses to acknowledge German rights in Samoa! Germany menaces the Western Hemispherel United States reneges on agreement to support German stand at Morocco! The age of imperi aIi sm prompted head 1ines I" ke these in both American and German newspapers at the turn of the century, Although little contact took place previously between the two countries, the diplomacy which did exist had been friendly in nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Jantzen on Wempe. Revenants of the German Empire: Colonial Germans, Imperialism, and the League of Nations
    H-German Jantzen on Wempe. Revenants of the German Empire: Colonial Germans, Imperialism, and the League of Nations. Discussion published by Jennifer Wunn on Wednesday, May 26, 2021 Review published on Friday, May 21, 2021 Author: Sean Andrew Wempe Reviewer: Mark Jantzen Jantzen on Wempe, 'Revenants of the German Empire: Colonial Germans, Imperialism, and the League of Nations' Sean Andrew Wempe. Revenants of the German Empire: Colonial Germans, Imperialism, and the League of Nations. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019. 304 pp. $78.00 (cloth), ISBN 978-0-19-090721-1. Reviewed by Mark Jantzen (Bethel College)Published on H-Nationalism (May, 2021) Commissioned by Evan C. Rothera (University of Arkansas - Fort Smith) Printable Version: https://www.h-net.org/reviews/showpdf.php?id=56206 Demise or Transmutation for a Unique National Identity? Sean Andrew Wempe’s investigation of the afterlife in the 1920s of the Germans who lived in Germany’s colonies challenges a narrative that sees them primarily as forerunners to Nazi brutality and imperial ambitions. Instead, he follows them down divergent paths that run the gamut from rejecting German citizenship en masse in favor of South African papers in the former German Southwest Africa to embracing the new postwar era’s ostensibly more liberal and humane version of imperialism supervised by the League of Nations to, of course, trying to make their way in or even support Nazi Germany. The resulting well-written, nuanced examination of a unique German national identity, that of colonial Germans, integrates the German colonial experience into Weimar and Nazi history in new and substantive ways.
    [Show full text]
  • Renaming Streets, Inverting Perspectives: Acts of Postcolonial Memory Citizenship in Berlin
    Focus on German Studies 20 41 Renaming Streets, Inverting Perspectives: Acts Of Postcolonial Memory Citizenship In Berlin Jenny Engler Humbolt University of Berlin n October 2004, the local assemblyman Christoph Ziermann proposed a motion to rename “Mohrenstraße” (Blackamoor Street) in the city center of Berlin (BVV- Mitte, “Drucksache 1507/II”) and thereby set in train a debate about how to deal Iwith the colonial past of Germany and the material and semantic marks of this past, present in public space. The proposal was discussed heatedly in the media, within the local assembly, in public meetings, in university departments, by historians and linguists, by postcolonial and anti-racist activists, by developmental non-profit organizations, by local politicians, and also by a newly founded citizens’ initiative, garnering much atten- tion. After much attention was given to “Mohrenstraße,” the issue of renaming, finally came to include the so-called African quarter in the north of Berlin, where several streets named after former colonial regions and, most notably, after colonial actors are located. The proposal to rename “Mohrenstraße” was refused by the local assembly. Nev- ertheless, the assembly passed a resolution that encourages the “critical examination of German colonialism in public streets” (BVV-Mitte, “Drucksache 1711/II”) and, ultimately, decided to set up an information board in the so-called African quarter in order to contextualize the street names (BVV-Mitte, “Drucksache 2112/III”). How- ever, the discussion of what the “critical
    [Show full text]
  • The Visual Archive of Colonialism: Germany and Namibia
    Photo-essay The Visual Archive of Colonialism: Germany and Namibia George Steinmetz and Julia Hell Colonial memories and images occupy a paradoxi- cal place in Germany. This is due in part to the peculiarities of German colo- nial history, but it also reflects another aspect of German exceptionalism — the legacy of Nazism and the Holocaust. In recent years German colonialism in Southwest Africa (Namibia) has been widely discussed, especially with respect to the attempted extermination of the Ovaherero people in 1904. For reasons explored in this article, these discussions of Germany’s involvement in Southwest Africa have created new and unexpected discursive connections that are reshap- ing colonial memories in both Germany and Namibia. One possible outcome could be a belated decolonization of the landscape of colonial memory in both countries. Postwar Germany was long preoccupied with its National Socialist prehistory; the German colonial past has only started to come into focus more recently.1 The years 2004 – 5 saw numerous commemorative events around the centenary of the 1904 German genocide of the Namibian Ovaherero people and the completion of the controversial Berlin Holocaust Memorial. On one level this is mere coinci- dence. At the same time, there is an increasing entanglement of these two central political topics. But little research has been done on the visual archive of German colonialism, in contrast to the extensive studies made of the public circulation of Thanks to Johannes von Moltke for helping us with the research into the November 2004 von Trotha – Maherero meeting. 1. For a discussion of the ways in which the formerly divided country’s Nazi past was thematized anew after 1989, see Julia Hell and Johannes von Moltke, “Unification Effects: Imaginary Land- scapes of the Berlin Republic,” in “The Cultural Logics of the Berlin Republic,” ed.
    [Show full text]
  • From Charlemagne to Hitler: the Imperial Crown of the Holy Roman Empire and Its Symbolism
    From Charlemagne to Hitler: The Imperial Crown of the Holy Roman Empire and its Symbolism Dagmar Paulus (University College London) [email protected] 2 The fabled Imperial Crown of the Holy Roman Empire is a striking visual image of political power whose symbolism influenced political discourse in the German-speaking lands over centuries. Together with other artefacts such as the Holy Lance or the Imperial Orb and Sword, the crown was part of the so-called Imperial Regalia, a collection of sacred objects that connotated royal authority and which were used at the coronations of kings and emperors during the Middle Ages and beyond. But even after the end of the Holy Roman Empire in 1806, the crown remained a powerful political symbol. In Germany, it was seen as the very embodiment of the Reichsidee, the concept or notion of the German Empire, which shaped the political landscape of Germany right up to National Socialism. In this paper, I will first present the crown itself as well as the political and religious connotations it carries. I will then move on to demonstrate how its symbolism was appropriated during the Second German Empire from 1871 onwards, and later by the Nazis in the so-called Third Reich, in order to legitimise political authority. I The crown, as part of the Regalia, had a symbolic and representational function that can be difficult for us to imagine today. On the one hand, it stood of course for royal authority. During coronations, the Regalia marked and established the transfer of authority from one ruler to his successor, ensuring continuity amidst the change that took place.
    [Show full text]
  • Were German Colonies Profitable?
    Were German colonies profitable? Marco Cokić BSc Economics 3rd year University College London Explore Econ Undergraduate Research Conference February 2020 Introduction In the era of colonialization, several, mainly European, powers tried to conquer areas very far away from their mainland, thereby creating multicontinental empires. One of these European powers was the German Empire which entered the game for colonies in the 1880s and was forced to leave it after World War I. Still, these involvements had a significant impact on several aspects of the German Empire. This essay discusses the question if the colonial policy of the German Empire until 1914 was an economic success. The reason for this approach is twofold. Firstly, economics can be seen as one of the main motivations of colonial policy (Blackbourn, 2003). Hence, looking at the economic results of this undertaking as a measure of success seems reasonable. Secondly, economic development can be measured relatively accurately and is a good proxy for defining success of the German colonial policy. Therefore, economic data will be used and tested against the economic hopes of advocates of colonialism during that period. The essay is split up into three main parts. In the first part, the historical background behind German colonialization and the colonies is introduced. After a brief explanation of the empirical strategy for this paper, data will be used to show if the German hopes were fulfilled. Theoretical background The German economy of the 1880s and German aims in the colonies In the 1880s, Germany was an economic leader. Several branches such as the chemical industry were worldwide leaders in their sectors and economic growth was, compared to other countries, very high (Tilly, 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • A University of Sussex Phd Thesis Available Online Via Sussex
    A University of Sussex PhD thesis Available online via Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/ This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Please visit Sussex Research Online for more information and further details The German colonial settler press in Africa, 1898-1916: a web of identities, spaces and infrastructure. Corinna Schäfer Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Sussex September 2017 I hereby declare that this thesis has not been and will not be, submitted in whole or in part to another University for the award of any other degree. Signature: Summary As the first comprehensive work on the German colonial settler newspapers in Africa between 1898 and 1916, this research project explores the development of the settler press, its networks and infrastructure, its contribution to the construction of identities, as well as to the imagination and creation of colonial space. Special attention is given to the newspapers’ relation to Africans, to other imperial powers, and to the German homeland. The research contributes to the understanding of the history of the colonisers and their societies of origin, as well as to the history of the places and people colonised.
    [Show full text]
  • The Anglophone Crisis in Cameroon: a Geopolitical Analysis
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by European Scientific Journal (European Scientific Institute) European Scientific Journal December 2019 edition Vol.15, No.35 ISSN: 1857 – 7881 (Print) e - ISSN 1857- 7431 The Anglophone Crisis in Cameroon: A Geopolitical Analysis Ekah Robert Ekah, Department of 'Cultural Diversity, Peace and International Cooperation' at the International Relations Institute of Cameroon (IRIC) Doi:10.19044/esj.2019.v15n35p141 URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.19044/esj.2019.v15n35p141 Abstract Anglophone Cameroon is the present-day North West and South West (English Speaking) regions of Cameroon herein referred to as No-So. These regions of Cameroon have been restive since 2016 in what is popularly referred to as the Anglophone crisis. The crisis has been transformed to a separatist movement, with some Anglophones clamoring for an independent No-So, re-baptized as “Ambazonia”. The purpose of the study is to illuminate the geopolitical perspective of the conflict which has been evaded by many scholars. Most scholarly write-ups have rather focused on the causes, course, consequences and international interventions in the crisis, with little attention to the geopolitical undertones. In terms of methodology, the paper makes use of qualitative data analysis. Unlike previous research works that link the unfolding of the crisis to Anglophone marginalization, historical and cultural difference, the findings from this paper reveals that the strategic location of No-So, the presence of resources, demographic considerations and other geopolitical parameters are proving to be responsible for the heightening of the Anglophone crisis in Cameroon and in favour of the quest for an independent Ambazonia.
    [Show full text]
  • “Just Call Me a Desert Researcher”
    Rüdiger Heimlich “Just call me a desert researcher” Whether in documentary films, exhibitions, talks or articles, for decades the Cologne-based geologist and climate scientist Stefan Kröpelin has been popularising the history, landscapes and people of the Sahara. As a field researcher and in many ways a ‘science ambassador’, the DFG and the Stifterverband have chosen him as the recipient of this year’s Communicator Award. The international journal Nature simply calls him the ‘man of the desert’. German radio station Deutschlandfunk has dubbed him the ‘German Indiana Jones’, and a Saudi glossy magazine the ‘veteran’ of Sahara research. Stefan Kröpelin prefers to be simply named a ‘desert researcher’, a geoscientist whose interest lies in the climate history of North Africa as well as in archaeology and nature conservation. “We travel through regions which no scientist has ever visited before and won’t visit again for a long time. You need to be open to anything and everything you encounter.” That might mean caves with rock paintings or the remains of freshwater shells in the desert sands. It might also mean scorpions in your sleeping bag, bandits or refugees in desperate search of water. What does a desert researcher need, apart from scientific expertise? A feel for people and landscapes, patience, determination and a large pinch of luck. Stefan Kröpelin has had all of these over the last four decades. When he recounts – and Kröpelin is an engaging speaker – the risky situations he and his teams have often found themselves in, sometimes without any apparent way out, his tales could easily beat any adventure novel.
    [Show full text]
  • Cameroon Sub-Saharan Report
    Marubeni Research Institute 2016/11/14 Sub -Saharan Report Sub-Saharan Africa is one of the focal regions of Global Challenge 2015. These reports are by Mr. Kenshi Tsunemine, an expatriate employee working in Johannesburg with a view across the region. Vol. 26 - Cameroon November 11, 2016 Speaking of Cameroon, at the joint FIFA Japan-Korea World Cup in 2002, the delay in the arrival of the Cameroon team to their camp in the village of Nakatsue in Oita Prefecture was a real hot topic in Japan and Japanese people may also recall that at the 2010 FIFA World Cup held in South Africa the Japanese team met Cameroon in their first match (group) of the tournament. So, it is the country of Cameroon that I am introducing this time, which most Japanese people know the name of because of their soccer team (note 1). Table 1: Cameroon Country Information Cameroon is located in Central Africa bordered by Nigeria in the northwest, Chad in the northeast, the Central African Republic in the east, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon and the Republic of the Congo in the south and opens to the Atlantic Ocean (Gulf of Guinea) in the west. The country is just a little north of the equator and encompasses most of Africa’s climates from a dry zone in the north to its rainforests in the south. Cameroon’s capital of Yaounde is located about 300 kilometers east and inland from the coast and is 700 meters above sea level with a comfortable climate that has an average annual temperature of around 24 degrees centigrade and low humidity.
    [Show full text]