English / French

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

English / French World Heritage 40 COM WHC/16/40.COM/8A Paris, 6 September 2016 Original: English / French UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE Fortieth session Istanbul, Turkey 10 - 20 July 2016 Item 8 of the Provisional Agenda: Establishment of the World Heritage List and of the List of World Heritage in Danger 8A. Tentative Lists submitted by States Parties as of 15 April 2016, in conformity with the Operational Guidelines SUMMARY This document presents the Tentative Lists of all States Parties submitted in conformity with the Operational Guidelines as of 15 April 2016. The World Heritage Committee is requested to note that all nominations of properties to be examined by the 40th session of the Committee are included on the Tentative Lists of the respective States Parties. • Annex 1 presents a full list of States Parties indicating the date of the most recent Tentative List submission; • Annex 2 presents new Tentative Lists (or additions to Tentative Lists) submitted by States Parties since 16 April 2015; • Annex 3 presents a list of all sites submitted on Tentative Lists received from the States Parties, in alphabetical order. Draft Decision: 40 COM 8A, see Point II I. EXAMINATION OF TENTATIVE LISTS 1. The World Heritage Convention provides that States Parties to the Convention shall submit to the World Heritage Committee an inventory of the cultural and natural properties situated within its territory, which it considers suitable for inscription on the World Heritage List, and which it intends to nominate during the following five to ten years. At its 24th session (Cairns, 2000), the Committee confirmed the importance of these Lists, also known as Tentative Lists, for planning purposes, comparative analyses of nominations and for facilitating the undertaking of global and thematic studies. It also decided that inclusion on the Tentative List would be mandatory for all sites that the State Party intends to nominate for inscription on the World Heritage List. 2. According to paragraph 65 of the Operational Guidelines, States Parties shall submit Tentative Lists at least one year prior to the submission of any nomination. Annex 2A of the Operational Guidelines shall be used as the Tentative List submission format for national sites. Annex 2B of the Operational Guidelines shall be used for all transnational and transboundary sites. The Tentative List submission for such transnational and transboundary sites will be valid only after the submission of all the States Parties involved. 3. In considering the use of Tentative Lists as a means for achieving the objectives of the Global Strategy, the Special Expert Meeting on “The Concept of Outstanding Universal Value”, Kazan, Russian Federation (April 2005), recommended that: States Parties should each establish a coordination mechanism with an interdisciplinary composition to undertake and effectively oversee the implementation of the World Heritage Convention and the preparation and review of Tentative Lists in particular; Tentative Lists should be seen as part of the effort of conservation of national heritage; Properties on Tentative Lists should have national and/or other appropriate recognition; Compilation of Tentative Lists should involve local communities and indigenous peoples and should include public consultation where appropriate; The compilation of Tentative Lists should take into account the Global Strategy, comparative studies and the Advisory Bodies’ gap analysis; The preparation of Tentative Lists should give due regard to other international conventions and programmes; In preparation of their Tentative Lists, States Parties should be rigorous in their local evaluation to ensure that expectations of inscription match reality; The size of a Tentative List should take into account the Cairns-Suzhou decision (Decision 28 COM 13.1) and the 10-year cycle of the Tentative List recommended by the Operational Guidelines (paragraph 65); The comparative analysis should be developed by regions and themes; Regional meetings on harmonization of Tentative Lists should identify types of properties for nomination in a given region, and those for possible inclusion as transnational and transboundary properties; States Parties with no Tentative List should be encouraged to request preparatory International Assistance, if necessary, for preparing their Tentative List; The Advisory Bodies, within their available resources, should comment on the Tentative Lists submitted by States Parties as of 15 April 2016 WHC/16/40.COM/8A p. 1 Tentative Lists of all States Parties upon request. 4. The resource manual Preparing World Heritage Nominations (http://whc.unesco.org/en/ preparing-world-heritage-nominations/) may also prove useful for the preparation of Tentative Lists. 5. As also noted in Document WHC/16/40.COM/9A in order for the Upstream Process to be more effective, the upstream support should ideally take place at an earlier stage of the nomination process, more precisely at the moment of revision of the States Parties Tentative Lists. Moreover, paragraph 71 of the Operational Guidelines encourages States Parties to seek, as early as possible, upstream advice during the development and revision of their Tentative Lists. While this important aspect has been repeatedly emphasized, only one request for upstream advice for the revision of a Tentative List has been registered so far. 6. In its Decision 38 COM 8A, the World Heritage Committee requested “the World Heritage Centre to present a proposal for revising the procedure of registration of Tentative Lists in the Operational Guidelines, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 39th session, in 2015”. At the 39th session, the Working Group on the Revision of the Operational Guidelines could not reach a consensus on the proposed amendment and the Committee in its Decision 39 COM 11 decided to re-examine paragraph 68 as well as Annex 2A at its 40th session. Accordingly, the Secretariat made a proposal for the revision of paragraph 68 of the Operational Guidelines, which is included in Document WHC/16/40.COM/11. 7. As of 15 April 2016, of the 191 States Parties which have ratified the Convention, 180 have submitted Tentative Lists in accordance with the requirements specified in the Operational Guidelines. 11 States Parties have not submitted any Tentative Lists. All nominations submitted for examination in 2016 (see Document WHC/16/40.COM/8B) are included in the Tentative Lists of the States Parties concerned. 8. In conformity with Committee Decision 27 COM 8A, paragraph 4, the Tentative Lists submissions received since 16 April 2015 are presented in Annex 2 of this document. Since 16 April 2015, 26 States Parties have submitted new Tentative Lists or have modified existing Lists, which meet all the requirements of paragraph 68 of the Operational Guidelines. The number of new sites added to existing Tentative Lists is 64. 9. In conformity with paragraph 68 of the Operational Guidelines, inscribed properties and nominated sites which the Committee decides not to inscribe on the World Heritage List are removed from the Tentative Lists of States Parties. 10. In conformity with the Operational Guidelines, paragraph 69, the complete Tentative Lists of all States Parties are accessible to the public at the following web address of the World Heritage Centre: http://whc.unesco.org/en/tentativelists. 11. States Parties, which have not yet done so, are invited to submit Tentative Lists in accordance with the Operational Guidelines. Preparatory assistance can be provided if necessary and requested by the State Party concerned. Tentative Lists submitted by States Parties as of 15 April 2016 WHC/16/40.COM/8A p. 2 II. DRAFT DECISION Draft Decision: 40 COM 8A The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC/16/40.COM/8A, 2. Stressing the importance of the process of revision and updating of Tentative Lists, as a tool for regional harmonisation of the World Heritage List and of long-term planning of its development; 3. Encourages States Parties to seek as early as possible upstream advice from the Advisory Bodies during the development or revision of their Tentative Lists as appropriate; 4. Takes note of the Tentative Lists presented in Annexes 2 and 3 of this document. Tentative Lists submitted by States Parties as of 15 April 2016 WHC/16/40.COM/8A p. 3 Content of the Annexes Annex 1 List of States Parties indicating the page 5 date of the most recent Tentative List submission Annex 2 New Tentative Lists and additions to page 7 Tentative Lists submitted since 16 April 2015 Annex 3 World Heritage Tentative Lists by page 9 region: page 9 Africa page 11 Arab States page 13 Asia and the Pacific page 18 Europe and North America page 24 Latin America and the Caribbean Tentative Lists submitted by States Parties as of 15 April 2016 WHC/16/40.COM/8A p. 4 Annex 1 List of States Parties indicating the date of the most recent Tentative List submission Absence of a date indicates that the State Party has not yet submitted a Tentative List in conformity with the requirements of the Operational Guidelines. State Party Last Bahrain 29/05/2008 Revision Egypt 03/09/2015 Iraq 28/03/2014 Africa Jordan 02/04/2015 Angola 03/06/2009 Kuwait 24/02/2015 Benin 22/01/2013 Lebanon 01/07/1996 Botswana 27/10/2010 Libya Burkina Faso 24/01/2012 Mauritania 14/06/2001 Burundi 09/05/2007 Morocco 27/11/2013 Cabo Verde 15/03/2016
Recommended publications
  • Champion Brands to My Wife, Mercy the ‘Made in Germany’ Champion Brands Nation Branding, Innovation and World Export Leadership
    The ‘Made in Germany’ Champion Brands To my wife, Mercy The ‘Made in Germany’ Champion Brands Nation Branding, Innovation and World Export Leadership UGESH A. JOSEPH First published 2013 by Gower Publishing Published 2016 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017, USA Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business Copyright © Ugesh A. Joseph 2013 Ugesh A. Joseph has asserted his right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, to be identified as the author of this work. Gower Applied Business Research Our programme provides leaders, practitioners, scholars and researchers with thought provoking, cutting edge books that combine conceptual insights, interdisciplinary rigour and practical relevance in key areas of business and management. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. The Library of Congress has cataloged the printed edition as follows: Joseph, Ugesh A. The ‘Made in Germany’ champion brands: nation branding, innovation and world export leadership / by Ugesh A. Joseph. pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-4094-6646-8 (hardback: alk.
    [Show full text]
  • Excavations at the Mound of Van Fortress / Tuspa*
    CollAn X 2011 147-166 Excavations at the Mound of Van Fortress / Tuspa* Erkan Konyar Keywords: The Mound of Van Fortress, Iron Age, Urartu, lower settlement, stratigraphy Anahtar Kelimeler: Van Kalesi Höyüğü, Demir Çağı, Urartu, aşağı yerleşme, stratigrafi The Van Fortress/Tuspa, the capital city of the Urartians, rises on a 100 meter high conglomerate rocky outcrop on the eastern shore of the Van Lake, measuring 1400 m in length and a varying width of 230-60 m in north-south axis (Fig. 1). Every corner of the outcrop, which is alone a monument itself, was utilized by the Urartian architects. Royal rock tombs, monumental open air sanctuaries and palaces are the most prominent architectural features of the capital. Many cuneiform inscriptions either on the rock surfaces or on the stelae, further cement its position as a capital. It is possible to trace the cultural remains and chronology of the 200 years of Urartian rule in the levels at the lower settlement. The 750 m-long mound of Van fortress is located just north of the citadel and lies in an east-west direction parallel to the citadel itself. The area forms the northern section of the lower settlement, while the southern section is named as the Old City of Van. Both of them constituted the lower settlement of Tuspa. Our prime concern was the extent of the lower settlement, i.e. the mound, since all the previous excavators have suggested the presence of earlier levels beneath the Old City of Van. The 1990 campaign in particular revealed earlier Urartian levels in the Upper Citadel trenches which provided important data on the matter.
    [Show full text]
  • Bauhaus 1 Bauhaus
    Bauhaus 1 Bauhaus Staatliches Bauhaus, commonly known simply as Bauhaus, was a school in Germany that combined crafts and the fine arts, and was famous for the approach to design that it publicized and taught. It operated from 1919 to 1933. At that time the German term Bauhaus, literally "house of construction" stood for "School of Building". The Bauhaus school was founded by Walter Gropius in Weimar. In spite of its name, and the fact that its founder was an architect, the Bauhaus did not have an architecture department during the first years of its existence. Nonetheless it was founded with the idea of creating a The Bauhaus Dessau 'total' work of art in which all arts, including architecture would eventually be brought together. The Bauhaus style became one of the most influential currents in Modernist architecture and modern design.[1] The Bauhaus had a profound influence upon subsequent developments in art, architecture, graphic design, interior design, industrial design, and typography. The school existed in three German cities (Weimar from 1919 to 1925, Dessau from 1925 to 1932 and Berlin from 1932 to 1933), under three different architect-directors: Walter Gropius from 1919 to 1928, 1921/2, Walter Gropius's Expressionist Hannes Meyer from 1928 to 1930 and Ludwig Mies van der Rohe Monument to the March Dead from 1930 until 1933, when the school was closed by its own leadership under pressure from the Nazi regime. The changes of venue and leadership resulted in a constant shifting of focus, technique, instructors, and politics. For instance: the pottery shop was discontinued when the school moved from Weimar to Dessau, even though it had been an important revenue source; when Mies van der Rohe took over the school in 1930, he transformed it into a private school, and would not allow any supporters of Hannes Meyer to attend it.
    [Show full text]
  • Yard. Doç. Dr. M. Fatih MÜDERRĠSOĞLU
    Yard. Doç. Dr. M. Fatih MÜDERRĠSOĞLU İş : Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakultesi Sanat Tarihi Bölümü 06800 Beytepe /Ankara Tel : 0 312 297 82 75 Faks : 0 312 297 20 05 I-ÖZGEÇMĠġ Üniversite :Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Arkeoloji – Sanat Tarihi Bölümü (1983) Lisans Tezi :Bursa Yıldırım Bayezıt Külliyesi , 2 Cilt (1983) Yüksek Lisans :Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Yüksek Lisans Tezi :Edirne II. Bayezid Külliyesi , 2 Cilt (1986) Doktora :Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Doktora Tezi :16.Yüzyılda Osmanlı İmparatorluğu’nda İnşa Edilen Menzil Külliyeleri, 2 Cilt (1993) AraĢtırma Görevliliği: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü (1985-1991); Edebiyat Fakültesi (1991-1995) Öğretim Görevliliği : Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi (1995-1997) Yardımcı Doçent : Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi (1997- ) II- ÜNĠVERSĠTE DIġI GÖREVLENDĠRME : T.C. Kültür Bakanlığı Kültür ve Tabiat Varlıklarını Koruma Genel Müdürlüğü Trabzon Bölge Kurulu Üyeliği (1995-97) Başkent Üniversitesi Güzel Sanatlar ve Tasarım Fakültesi’nde saat başı ek ücretle görevlendirme. (2004-05 Bahar) Ufuk Üniversitesi İngilizce Öğretmenliği Bölümü’nde saat başı ek ücretle görevlendirme (2007-08 ve 2008-2009 Güz dönemleri III- ULUSAL VE ULUSLAR ARASI SEMĠNER , KONGRE , SEMPOZYUM VE PANELLER : Uluslar Arası 1-“Osmanlı İmparatorluğunun Doğu Akdeniz’deki İskelesi Payas ve Sokullu Mehmet Paşa Menzil Külliyesi” , 9. Milletlerarası Türk Sanatları Kongresi’ne Sunulan Bildiri , Ġstanbul Eylül 1991, Kültür Bakanlığı
    [Show full text]
  • Tentative Lists Submitted by States Parties As of 15 April 2021, in Conformity with the Operational Guidelines
    World Heritage 44 COM WHC/21/44.COM/8A Paris, 4 June 2021 Original: English UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE Extended forty-fourth session Fuzhou (China) / Online meeting 16 – 31 July 2021 Item 8 of the Provisional Agenda: Establishment of the World Heritage List and of the List of World Heritage in Danger 8A. Tentative Lists submitted by States Parties as of 15 April 2021, in conformity with the Operational Guidelines SUMMARY This document presents the Tentative Lists of all States Parties submitted in conformity with the Operational Guidelines as of 15 April 2021. • Annex 1 presents a full list of States Parties indicating the date of the most recent Tentative List submission. • Annex 2 presents new Tentative Lists (or additions to Tentative Lists) submitted by States Parties since 16 April 2019. • Annex 3 presents a list of all sites included in the Tentative Lists of the States Parties to the Convention, in alphabetical order. Draft Decision: 44 COM 8A, see point II I. EXAMINATION OF TENTATIVE LISTS 1. The World Heritage Convention provides that each State Party to the Convention shall submit to the World Heritage Committee an inventory of the cultural and natural sites situated within its territory, which it considers suitable for inscription on the World Heritage List, and which it intends to nominate during the following five to ten years. Over the years, the Committee has repeatedly confirmed the importance of these Lists, also known as Tentative Lists, for planning purposes, comparative analyses of nominations and for facilitating the undertaking of global and thematic studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Bölüm Adı : SANAT TARİHİ
    Bölüm Adı : SANAT TARİHİ Tüm Dönemler EDSTN 217 - Arkeoloji Anadolu Uyg-III - Kredi: 2( T : 2 - U : 0 ) - AKTS : 4 Paleolitik /Epipaleolitik Dönem ve Özellikleri , Anadolu dışındaki önemli Paleolitik Merkezler(Alatamira ve Lascaux Mağaraları) , Anadoludaki Paleolitik dönem mağaralarından örnekler( Karain, Öküzini Yarımburgaz, Dülük, Palanlı Kaletepe vd.) , Anadoludaki Paleolitik Dönem yerleşmeleri , Mezolitik Çağ ve bu döneme ait yerleşim alanları , Aseramik /Erken Neolitik Çağ Yerleşmeleri , Madenin kullanımı , Erken Neolitik Dönem (seramiksiz dönem) ve Natuf Kültürü , Erken Neolitik Çağ Yerleşmeleri (Göbeklitepe, Hallan Çemi,Nevala Çori, Çayönü,Aşıklı höyük , Çayönü ve madenin kullanımı konut mimarisinin gelişimi , Çatalhöyük Seramiksiz ve seramikli dönem , Çatal Höyükte Konut Mimarisi , Ölü Gömme ve Ata Kültü geleneği , Çatalhöyük Konutlarındaki Kültsel yapılar ve din olgusu , EDSTN 449 - Çağdaş Sanat-I - Kredi: 2( T : 2 - U : 0 ) - AKTS : 5 Neoklasizm ve realizm , Romantizm , Empresyonizm , Sembolizm , Ekspresyonizm , Bauhaus , Fovizm , ARA SINAV , Kübizm , Fütürizm , Dadaizm , Konstrüktivizm , Süpremaztizm , De Stijl Grubu ve Sürrealizm , EDSTN 219 - Ortaçağ İslam Sanatı-III - Kredi: 2( T : 2 - U : 0 ) - AKTS : 4 Karahanlı Dönemi hakkında genel bilgi ve yapı grupları ile genel özellikleri , Karahanlı Dönemi Türkistan Camileri (Çilburç, Başhane, Dehistan,) , Talhatan Baba, Buhara Namazgah Magaki Attari camileri , Karahanlı Minareleri Burana, Kalan minareleri) , Can kurgan Vabkent minareleri , Karahanlı türbeleri (Tim Arap Ata, Ayşe Bibi) , Özkent Türbeleri, Şeyh Fazıl Türbesi , Karahanlı Hanları (Manakeldi, Daye Hatun) , Akçakale, Dehistan Hanları , Karahanlı Dönemi taşınabilir eserlerden örnekler , Gazneli dönemi minareleri (III. Mesut Sultan Mahmut Minareleri) , Gazneli Türbeleri (Aslancazip, Babahatim) , Gazneli dönemi sarayları (Leşger-i Bazar, III. Mesut) , Gazneli dönemi taşınabilir eserlerden örnekler , EDSTN 237 - Bizans Sanatı I - Kredi: 2( T : 2 - U : 0 ) - AKTS : 4 Byzansolojinin ortaya çıkışı , anlamı, gelişmi.
    [Show full text]
  • (A ) K E Yn O Te Sp Eake Rs (A ) Moderator
    International 7th Landscape Architecture Congress 06 – 08 November 2019 Antalya “LANDSCAPES AS A COLLECTIVE MEMORY” DAY 1 - 6th November 2019 Wednesday 08:30 10:00 Registration 10.00 11.00 Opening Speeches 11:00 11:15 Coffee Break 11:15 11:45 Opening of Exhibition and Poster Presentation 12:00 13:00 Lunch Moderator: Prof. Dr. Şükran ŞAHİN 13:00 14:00 Vulnerability As An Asset. Landscape Design Moving People Forward - Valerio Cozzi (A) Reading The Historical Background of Landscape As An Asset - Oktan NALBANTOĞLU Keynote Keynote Speakers Speakers 14:00 14:15 Question-Answer 14:15 14:30 Coffee Break Moderator: Dr. Ayşegül ORUÇKAPTAN 14:30 15:30 The City of the Blinds: The Urban Memory Experience Carried to the Future - Gökçe SAYGIN BATISTA (A) Memory And Identity Landscapes Of Slavonski Brod-Posavina County, The Republic Of Croatia - Darija Perkovic Keynote Keynote Speakers Speakers 15:30 15:45 Question-Answer 15:45 16:00 Coffee Break Moderator: Prof. Dr. Bülent YILMAZ Moderator: Hasibe AKKAN Irrigation in Sustainable Landscape Areas An Example of a Memory Space: Kırklareli Province Şeytan Creek 16:00 16:15 Mustafa Özgür TUNÇ - Hunter Industries - Yaşar MENTEŞ Amended Tourism Incentive Law and Its Reflections Against Urban topography designed with landscape: Towards an 16:15 16:30 Nature - Öner DEMİREL interdisciplinary design strategy - Nazmiye NURDOĞAN Evaluation of the daily and social memory of the steppe Investigation of Sustainable Urban Design in the Neighborhood 16:30 16:45 landscape through the Arguvan - Sevgi GÖRMÜŞ Scale - Ali Kemal ARKUN Session 1 (A) 1 Session (B) 1 Session Examining Urban Identity in Port Cities: The Case of the Port The role of green spaces in Fringe-Belt formation - Nevter City and Memory 16:45 17:00 City of Hamburg and Barcelona Memory and Nature and Memory Zafer CÖMERT Şeyma SARIARMAĞAN 17:00 17:15 Question-Answer Question-Answer 17:15 17:30 Coffee Break Moderator: Teoman AKÇALI Moderator: Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • General Index
    General Index Italic page numbers refer to illustrations. Authors are listed in ical Index. Manuscripts, maps, and charts are usually listed by this index only when their ideas or works are discussed; full title and author; occasionally they are listed under the city and listings of works as cited in this volume are in the Bibliograph- institution in which they are held. CAbbas I, Shah, 47, 63, 65, 67, 409 on South Asian world maps, 393 and Kacba, 191 "Jahangir Embracing Shah (Abbas" Abywn (Abiyun) al-Batriq (Apion the in Kitab-i balJriye, 232-33, 278-79 (painting), 408, 410, 515 Patriarch), 26 in Kitab ~urat ai-arc!, 169 cAbd ai-Karim al-Mi~ri, 54, 65 Accuracy in Nuzhat al-mushtaq, 169 cAbd al-Rabman Efendi, 68 of Arabic measurements of length of on Piri Re)is's world map, 270, 271 cAbd al-Rabman ibn Burhan al-Maw~ili, 54 degree, 181 in Ptolemy's Geography, 169 cAbdolazlz ibn CAbdolgani el-Erzincani, 225 of Bharat Kala Bhavan globe, 397 al-Qazwlni's world maps, 144 Abdur Rahim, map by, 411, 412, 413 of al-BlrunI's calculation of Ghazna's on South Asian world maps, 393, 394, 400 Abraham ben Meir ibn Ezra, 60 longitude, 188 in view of world landmass as bird, 90-91 Abu, Mount, Rajasthan of al-BlrunI's celestial mapping, 37 in Walters Deniz atlast, pl.23 on Jain triptych, 460 of globes in paintings, 409 n.36 Agapius (Mabbub) religious map of, 482-83 of al-Idrisi's sectional maps, 163 Kitab al- ~nwan, 17 Abo al-cAbbas Abmad ibn Abi cAbdallah of Islamic celestial globes, 46-47 Agnese, Battista, 279, 280, 282, 282-83 Mu\:lammad of Kitab-i ba/Jriye, 231, 233 Agnicayana, 308-9, 309 Kitab al-durar wa-al-yawaqft fi 11m of map of north-central India, 421, 422 Agra, 378 n.145, 403, 436, 448, 476-77 al-ra~d wa-al-mawaqft (Book of of maps in Gentil's atlas of Mughal Agrawala, V.
    [Show full text]
  • Experience Technology Live INTERVITIS INTERFRUCTA HORTITECHNICA Innovations for Wine, Juice and Special Crops
    MessageTRADE FAIRS | CONGRESSES | EVENTS 03 | 2016 Experience technology live INTERVITIS INTERFRUCTA HORTITECHNICA Innovations for wine, juice and special crops IT & Business Motek SEMF Showcases for For process competence – Mega techno party Industry and Office 4.0 against show event at Messe Stuttgart In the phrase „service partner“ there are two words that we are particularly fond of: „service“ and „partner“ CONTENTS NEWS – TRENDS 04 Major headway on construction Work on the Paul Horn Hall and on the West Entrance is proceeding at full steam 05 Editorial Digitisation as mega trend COVER STORY 08 Experience technology live INTERVITIS INTERFRUCTA HORTITECHNICA – Innovations for wine, juice and special crops LOCATION STUTTGART 14 Five stars for Stuttgart and its region Digitisation hotspot 18 17 Innovative region Stuttgart High Performance Computing Center Stuttgart (HLRS) TRADE FAIRS – MARKETS 18 VISION: The success story continues 20 IT & Business: Digitalised 4.0 processes live 24 Motek: For process competence – against show event 28 südback: Cross-selling – Making the cash tills ring twice Whether you want to hold a unique corporate event or you wish to have perfect lighting for your trade fair stand: we deploy our extensive know-how and high-quality MEDIA – PEOPLE equipment to develop tailor-made services perfectly shaped to your requirements. 44 Portrait: Stefanie Kromer, Communication What is more, we have been a partner of Messe Stuttgart for many years now and have an office 20 Coordinator at Messe Stuttgart right here on site. Our services cover the whole range of event needs in the fields of rigging and media technology – provided by a highly qualified team of professionals.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlantic Slavery and the Making of the Modern World Wenner-Gren Symposium Supplement 22
    T HE WENNER-GREN SYMPOSIUM SERIES CURRENT ANTHROPOLOGY A TLANTIC SLAVERY AND THE MAKING OF THE MODERN WORLD I BRAHIMA THIAW AND DEBORAH L. MACK, GUEST EDITORS A tlantic Slavery and the Making of the Modern World: Wenner-Gren Symposium Supplement 22 Atlantic Slavery and the Making of the Modern World: Experiences, Representations, and Legacies An Introduction to Supplement 22 Atlantic Slavery and the Rise of the Capitalist Global Economy V The Slavery Business and the Making of “Race” in Britain OLUME 61 and the Caribbean Archaeology under the Blinding Light of Race OCTOBER 2020 VOLUME SUPPLEMENT 61 22 From Country Marks to DNA Markers: The Genomic Turn S UPPLEMENT 22 in the Reconstruction of African Identities Diasporic Citizenship under Debate: Law, Body, and Soul Slavery, Anthropological Knowledge, and the Racialization of Africans Sovereignty after Slavery: Universal Liberty and the Practice of Authority in Postrevolutionary Haiti O CTOBER 2020 From the Transatlantic Slave Trade to Contemporary Ethnoracial Law in Multicultural Ecuador: The “Changing Same” of Anti-Black Racism as Revealed by Two Lawsuits Filed by Afrodescendants Serving Status on the Gambia River Before and After Abolition The Problem: Religion within the World of Slaves The Crying Child: On Colonial Archives, Digitization, and Ethics of Care in the Cultural Commons A “tone of voice peculiar to New-England”: Fugitive Slave Advertisements and the Heterogeneity of Enslaved People of African Descent in Eighteenth-Century Quebec Valongo: An Uncomfortable Legacy Raising
    [Show full text]
  • Yeni Bir Belgeye Göre XVI. Yüzyılın İlk Yarısında Osmanlı Mülâzemet Sistemi
    ERCAN ALAN Yeni Bir Belgeye Göre XVI. Yüzyılın İlk Yarısında Osmanlı Mülâzemet Sistemi Ercan Alan* Ottoman Mulâzamat System in the First Half of the 16th Century in the Light of a New Document Abstract Mulazemet was a prerequisite for joining the Ottoman ilmiye establish- ment. This paper is a study of a mulazemet register dated 906-911 Hijri (1501- 1506), the earliest mulazemet register found so far. It shows that the mulazemet system gained its shape and form in the reign of Bayezid II. Although it is known that mulazemet system was in use since the end of the 15th century, how it was applied has remained obscure. It is generally accepted that mulazemet system was systematized by Ebussuud Efendi in the second half of 16th century during the reign of Suleiman the Magnificent. Beginning with İsmail Hakkı Uzunçarşılı, several researchers have studied different aspects of the issue, still, the development of the mulazemet system has remained in the dark. A detailed analysis of this register shows that mulazemet was already a systematized practice during the reign of Bayezid II. Keywords: Bayezid II, Ilmiye, Kadiasker of Rumelia, Ruznamce register, Qadâ, Qâdi, Madrasa, Mudarris, Mulazemet, 16th century. Daha çok, ilmiye mesleğindeki intisap süreçlerini ve mesleki kariyere baş- langıç aşamalarını ifade eden bir terim olarak mülâzemet medrese mezunları- nın müderris ya da kadı olmak için isimlerinin deftere kaydedilmesiyle başlayan kadı veya müderrislik adaylığı süreci ile fiili olarak kadı ve müderrislik yaparken “müddet-i örfiye” olarak da adlandırılan muayyen görev sürelerini dolduran kadı * Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Osmanlı Araştırmaları / The Journal of Ottoman Studies, XLIX (2017), 89-124 89 MÜLÂZEMET SİSTEMİ ve müderrislerin yeni bir göreve atanıncaya kadar İstanbul’da geçirdikleri mazuli- yet ve mesleki gelişim/eğitim sürecini ifade etmektedir.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Classification of the Turkish Terranes and Sutures and Its Implication for the Paleotectonic History of the Region
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Tectonophysics 451 (2008) 7–39 www.elsevier.com/locate/tecto A new classification of the Turkish terranes and sutures and its implication for the paleotectonic history of the region ⁎ Patrice Moix a, , Laurent Beccaletto b, Heinz W. Kozur c, Cyril Hochard a, François Rosselet d, Gérard M. Stampfli a a Institut de Géologie et de Paléontologie, Université de Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland b BRGM, Service GEOlogie / Géologie des Bassins Sédimentaires, 3 Av. Cl. Guillemin - BP 36009, FR-45060 Orléans Cedex 2, France c Rézsü u. 83, H-1029 Budapest, Hungary d IHS Energy, 24, chemin de la Mairie, CH-1258 Perly, Switzerland Received 15 October 2007; accepted 6 November 2007 Available online 14 December 2007 Abstract The Turkish part of the Tethyan realm is represented by a series of terranes juxtaposed through Alpine convergent movements and separated by complex suture zones. Different terranes can be defined and characterized by their dominant geological background. The Pontides domain represents a segment of the former active margin of Eurasia, where back-arc basins opened in the Triassic and separated the Sakarya terrane from neighbouring regions. Sakarya was re-accreted to Laurasia through the Balkanic mid-Cretaceous orogenic event that also affected the Rhodope and Strandja zones. The whole region from the Balkans to the Caucasus was then affected by a reversal of subduction and creation of a Late Cretaceous arc before collision with the Anatolian domain in the Eocene. If the Anatolian terrane underwent an evolution similar to Sakarya during the Late Paleozoic and Early Triassic times, both terranes had a diverging history during and after the Eo-Cimmerian collision.
    [Show full text]