DOCSLIB.ORG

Energy Sector of Montenegro S T R a T E G I C G O a L S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Miroslav MARKOVI Ć, M.Sc.E.E. MONTENEGRIN ELECTRIC ENTERPRISE --NIKŠINIKŠI Ć ENERGY SECTOR OF MONTENEGRO S T R A T E G I C G O A L S Workshop on WATER-FOOD-ENERGY-ECOSYSTEMS NEXUS ASSESSMENT IN THE SAVA RIVER BASIN Z A G R E B March 4-6, 2014 MONTENEGRO Situated in the southsouth--westwest part of the Balkan PeniPeninsula,nsula, on the south coastcoast of the Adriatic Sea Surface 13 812 sq.km Population 662 000 Length of borders 614 km Lenght of sea coast 93 km The highest mountain Durmitor (2 525 m) The deepest canyon Tara (1 300 m) Largest town Podgorica The Capital Cetinje THE HISTORY OF MONTENEGRIN POWER SYSTEM Electrification of Montenegro began with the first decade of the 20 thth century First power plant was put into operation on August 19 thth , 1910 (Cetinje, 2x110 kW, diesel) First phase of development of the Montenegrin power system HPP Podgor (1937), HPP Rijeka Mušovi ća (1950), HPP Slap Zete (1952), HPP Rijeka Crnojevi ća (1952), HPP Glava Zete (1955) Second phase of development of the Montenegrin power system ( HPP Peru ćica, HPP Piva, TPP Pljevlja) Parallel construction of transsmision and distribution networks -10.000 10.000 20.000 30.000 40.000 50.000 60.000 ENERGY DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY BY 2030 BY STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT ENERGY - 1990 22.07 16.94 Gross domestic consumption of energy, 1990-2010 (PJ) of energy, consumption domestic Gross 1997 19.02 13.64 1998 22.20 15.00 1999 21.48 16.36 2000 21.51 18.69 2001 18.87 19.12 1 PJ (Petajoul) = 10 =(Petajoul) PJ 1 2002 22.60 19.13 2003 22.59 19.31 2004 24.48 18.82 3.14 2005 21.64 17.53 1.83 2006 23.08 19.53 15 2.76 jouls 2007 19.68 23.40 1.56 2008 25.11 22.91 2.48 2009 18.57 17.81 2.12 2010 28.92 14.21 brodova proizvodi + povraćeni energije proizvodnja Primarna - uvoz (uvoz Neto izvoz) me Saldoskladišta + ñ unarodnihbunkera 100% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 0% ENERGY DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY BY 2030 BY STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT ENERGY 1990 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 200 56.5 19.1 24.5 Final energy consumption by sector, 1990-2010 (%) (%) 1990-2010 bysector, energyconsumption Final 46.0 18.3 35.7 42.5 24.8 32.7 40.4 28.1 31.4 40.8 28.2 31.0 43.6 24.6 31.8 46.8 20.0 33.2 45.8 19.6 34.6 45.7 21.1 33.2 46.3 22.4 31.3 45.4 25.6 28.9 42.9 26.8 30.3 8 2009 2010 40.7 28.3 31.0 24.0 39.2 36.7 24.1 39.0 36.9 javna javna dr. adm.i Industrija Saobraćaj Domaćinstva,trgovina, ENERGY DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY BY 2030 60.000 50.000 Električna energija (saldo 6.79 2.02 uvoz/izvoza i razmjena sa 2.02 9.32 6.65 RS) 40.000 4.77 6.43 6.44 5.55 9.94 7.33 2.31 4.67 2.02 3.83 Čvrsta biomasa i otpad 4.78 1.39 2.15 2.02 2.02 3.26 3.57 6.08 2.02 2.05 1.43 1.59 (OIE) *) 1.37 8.06 6.30 4.63 5.71 1.45 5.54 30.000 3.65 3.96 6.72 4.98 6.18 6.12 7.46 1.79 6.39 Hidro 5.19 19.59 19.59 15.72 15.72 12.92 12.92 13.68 20.000 15.97 14.60 14.41 16.22 19.34 13.00 12.36 15.13 Naftni derivati 13.73 16.91 10.14 10.000 Ugalj 17.56 16.00 15.64 14.71 13.82 13.76 13.51 13.53 13.29 12.17 11.99 10.53 10.55 10.33 8.63 0.000 1990 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Gross domestic consumption of energy and fuel, 1990-2010 (PJ) ENERGY DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY BY 2030 20.000 18.000 16.000 0.01 14.000 4.77 6.65 6.44 6.79 6.43 12.000 4.67 6.08 7.33 3.83 3.57 3.26 4.98 Neto uvoz (uvoz - izvoz) *) 10.000 4.78 9.94 Hidroelektrane (HE Perućica, HE Piva, mHE) 8.000 Termoelektrana (TE Pljevlja) 8.06 8.06 6.30 6.30 5.55 5.55 5.54 6.72 6.12 5.71 6.18 6.000 3.96 7.46 3.65 6.39 5.19 4.63 4.000 5.07 2.000 4.64 4.42 4.33 4.31 4.10 3.85 3.84 3.73 3.59 3.44 3.10 3.01 2.61 2.48 - 1990 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Gross electricity supply, 1990-2010 (PJ) ENERGY DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY BY 2030 100% 0.0 90% 27.1 24.9 28.6 27.8 32.9 80% 38.2 37.8 40.3 39.5 38.4 38.5 40.0 46.7 70% 66.2 60% Neto uvoz (uvoz - izvoz) *) 50% 46.6 46.9 Hidroelektrane (HE Perućica, HE Piva, mHE) 48.4 29.1 40.2 54.2 32.7 34.0 36.5 40% 39.4 Termoelektrana (TE Pljevlja) 40.1 40.1 25.2 25.2 42.4 42.4 30% 27.2 20% 33.7 32.7 28.5 28.1 27.3 27.0 26.5 26.1 10% 25.0 23.1 22.8 21.4 18.2 18.0 17.3 0% 1990 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Gross electricity supply, 1990-2010 (%) 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 60.00 70.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00 50.00 55.00 60.00 65.00 70.00 0.00 28.1 2000 2000 2001 2001 2002 2002 2003 2003 2004 2005 2004 2006 2005 2007 2006 2030 BY STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT ENERGY 2008 2007 2009 2008 35.8 2010 2009 2011 2010 30.0 2012 2011 2013 2012 2014 2013 2015 2014 44.1 2016 2015 2017 2018 2016 2019 2017 2020 2018 2021 2019 50.0 2020 2021 2025 54.8 2025 2030 59.2 Ogrijevno drvo Ogrijevno i dr. briketi Peleti, (termalna) Sunčeva Ugalj gas Prirodni TNG Lož ulje Dizel Benzin gorivo Mlazno potrošnja Ne-energetska energija Električna grijanja daljinskog iz Toplota *) Geotermalna 2030 mjerama sc.sa Srednji mjera sc.bez Srednji scenario Referentni - mjerama sa sc. Visoki scenario granični Gornji - mjera bez sc. Visoki granični scenario granični sc.-Donji Niski Realised (2000-2010) and forecasted (2000-2010) forecasted and Realised total final energy consumption energyfinalconsumption by total energy form by 2030 -formby2030 energy Reference consumption - consumption (2000- realisation 2010) and forecast by2030,PJ and forecast 2010) Key scenarios of scenarios energy final Key scenario (PJ) (PJ) scenario ENERGY DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY BY 2030 GWh Uvoz 10,000 Fotonaponske Biomasa 8,000 Vjetroelektrane HE Komarnica 6,000 HE na Mora či TE Pljevlja II 4,000 TE Mao če TE Pljevlja I 2,000 EPS-HE Piva Male HE 0 HE Peru ćica Saldo uvoz-izvoz 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 -2,000 Izvoz Uvoz -4,000 Potrošnja na mreži prenosa Energy balance of Montenegro in the period 2011-2030 (GWh) MAIN PRIORITIES OF ENERGY POLICY BY 2030 1. Security in the energy supply 2. Development of the competitive energy market 3. Sustainable energy development KEY STRATEGIC COMMITMENTS BY 2030 Maintenance, rehabilitation and modernization of existing and construction of new infrastructure for production, transmission and distribution of energy on the principles of fulfilment of international technical standards, energy efficiency, reduction of losses and its negative impact on environment; Gradual reduction of energy import dependence by (i) reducing the specific consumption of final energy, (ii) increasing the energy production (primary and secondary) by use of own resources and (iii) reducing the energy losses from production to end consumption. From the current net energy importer, Montenegro plans to become the net exporter of electrical energy after 2020; KEY STRATEGIC COMMITMENTS BY 2030 Reviewing the existing barriers for activation of all long-term energy development options; Energy efficiency represents a priority in Montenegrin energy policy: a. Provision of institutional conditions and financial incentives with the purpose to improve EE and reduce energy intensity in all sectors, from production to end consumption of energy; b. Montenegro shall reach the indicative target of EE increase , which represents saving in the amount of 9% of the average final energy consumption in the country (without Aluminium Plant Podgorica) until 2018. Interim indicative goal until the end of 2012 amounts to 2%. Remaining average annual saving after 2018 shall be in compliance with the goals set out at the level of Energy Community or EU; c. Rational use of energy in transport and promotion of EE measures (improved public transportation including the railway transport, promotion of energy efficient and low-emission vehicles, and integration of EE criteria in the transport infrastructure projects); KEY STRATEGIC COMMITMENTS BY 2030 Exploration of oil and gas in the Montenegrin undersea and in continental area, as well as of coal in Pljevlja and Berane basin; Proactive role of the policy of the State of Montenegro in the endeavors to provide access to the systems of natural gas through the international projects (Ionian-Adriatic gas pipeline and others), development of natural gas system (including the construction of regional gas pipelines and plants for utilization of natural gas); Increased operational efficiency of energy companies by reducing the operational costs, technical and commercial energy losses, with justified return on investments; Continued restructuring of EPCG AD and CGES AD in accordance with the principles of relevant EU energy legislation and duly issuing of plans for further development; Sustainable development of energy sector in relation to the environment protection and international cooperation in this field, especially regarding the reduction of gas emission with greenhouse effect; Pursuant to the verification of Kyoto protocol , being the country outside the annex of developed countries at least until 2012, provision on support to investors and provision of conditions for implementation of projects of so called Clean Development Mechanism (CDM); KEY STRATEGIC COMMITMENTS BY 2030 Incentives for researches, development, transfer and application of ecologically sustainable new technologies in the energy sector; increased investments in education and scientific-research projects and incentives for the international cooperation in the field of ecologically sustainable new technologies in the energy sector, as well as introduction of lectures on energy in the educational system; Harmonization of legislative -regulatory framework in accordance with the EU requirements and ensuring support
Recommended publications
  • Nature Protection in the Legislative Framework in Montenegro

    Nature Protection in the Legislative Framework in Montenegro

    13th COUNCIL OF EUROPE MEETING OF THE WORKSHOPS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EUROPEAN LANDSCAPE CONVENTION “Territories of the future, landscape identification and assessment: an exercise in democracy” Nature Protection in the legislative framework in Montenegro Marina Spahic, Directorate of Nature Protection General Directorate for Environmental Protection and Climate Change Legislation • The activity of nature protection in Montenegro is based on the : Law on Nature Protection ("Official Gazette of Montenegro", 51/08) Law on National Parks ("Official Gazette of Montenegro", 56/09). Draft Law on Amendments to the Law on Nature Protection was adopted by the Government on session held on 28 June 2012, which is now in the parliamentary procedure. • Draft Law on National Parks • Institutional framework • Ministry of Sustainable Development and Tourism • Environmental Protection Agency • Public Enterprise National Parks of Montenegro Clasification of protected areas • Special nature reserves • National Parks • Regional Parks⁄Parks of nature • Monuments of nature • Protected habitat • Landscapes of special natural characteristics (article 43) Declaration • Study of protection for the area • Parliament of Montenegro • Goverment of Montenegro • Local goverments • Register of Protected Areas Protected areas National parks – 7,77 % -Skadar lake-40.000 ha -Lovcen-6.400 ha -Durmitor-33.895 ha -Biogradska Gora- 5.400 ha -Prokletije-16.038 ha Monuments of Nature-0.987% Nature reserves- 0.047% Landscapes of special natural characteristic0.025% Territories
  • Drina River Basin Nexus Assessment - Phase II National Consultation Meeting KTH – Royal Institute of Technology: Emir Fejzić Youssef Almulla Dr

    Drina River Basin Nexus Assessment - Phase II National Consultation Meeting KTH – Royal Institute of Technology: Emir Fejzić Youssef Almulla Dr

    Drina River Basin nexus assessment - Phase II National Consultation meeting KTH – Royal Institute of Technology: Emir Fejzić Youssef Almulla Dr. Vignesh Sridharan Dr. Francesco Gardumi 28/12/2020 National Consultation meeting 1 Agenda Key questions Scenarios Approach The river basin Preliminary results Hydro power plant cascade 28/12/2020 National Consultation meeting 2 Key questions to be addressed in Phase II • What role can renewables (hydro and non-hydro) in the Drina basin play in achieving the UNFCCC Nationally Determined Contributions? • What benefits does an increased share of non-hydro RES bring in terms of GHG emissions reduction and reduced stress on hydro power especially considering the need for flood containment measures. o To what extent may hydro power plants provide environmental services (e.g. environmental flows and flood control), and what impact does that have on their potential generation? • What are the effects of climate induced variability on hydropower generation? • What role could non-hydro RES play if the proposed plans for HPP development in the DRB are executed? • What effects can the Emission Trading Scheme, as part of the EU integration pathway, have on hydro and non-hydro RES development in the riparian countries? • In which way can hydro and non-hydro RES be impacted by the implementation of energy efficiency measures (demand- and supply-side)? 28/12/2020 National Consultation meeting 3 Scenarios proposed in Phase II • Reference scenario o Current policies, including INDC • Carbon pricing scenario o Effects
  • Mapping and Assessment Ecosystems and Their Services of Grassland and Forest in Montenegro (Project Title)

    Mapping and Assessment Ecosystems and Their Services of Grassland and Forest in Montenegro (Project Title)

    ANNEX 5 TERMS OF REFERENCE Transfer of Czech Knowledge: Mapping and Assessment Ecosystems and their Services of Grassland and Forest in Montenegro (Project Title) Project Objectives: Czech Republic invested significant effort in quantifying what is the contribution of protected areas to national economy. During these processes undertaken by different institutions and organizations, several projects focused on mapping and assessing services provided by grassland and forests where implemented. These initiatives are contributing not only to disseminating the knowledge and understanding of value and importance of services provided by ecosystems but is directly contributing to global processes such as Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, The economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity etc). Taking in consideration that Montenegro is making first steps toward understanding and indorsing these initiatives and practice, through this project we would link these institutions with partner institutions from Montenegro, and establish linkages and partnerships that would be mutually beneficial. The main strength of the project would be focusing on learning by doing approach. Two pilot sites would be used as pilots for joint work of Czech and Montenegro experts in order to obtain detailed assessment of ecosystem services provided by forests and grasslands in these areas. Czech experience will be amended to fit Montenegro legal and development framework, and set of recommendations will be developed, based on experiences gained in PES schemes design in two pilot sites. Sites are predefined as area of Komovi and Piva Mountain massif. In these two areas UNDP CO Montenegro is working on establishment of two new protected areas (level of regional parks, category III as per IUCN categorization).
  • Support to Water Resources Management in the Drina River Basin

    Support to Water Resources Management in the Drina River Basin

    Confluence of Lim River and Drina River, Republika Srpska, Bosnia & Herzegovina Summary of key facts related to HPPs in country reports Belgrade, January 25, 2016 Outlook on presentation • Electricity generation and consumption structure in Serbia • High voltage grid in Serbia • General situation of hydropower in Drina river basin • Existing hydropower plants in Drina river basin • Conceivable hydropower plants in Drina river basin • Recommendations 2 Production and consumption in Serbia 2010 2030 Production Consumption 3 Production and consumption in Bosnia 2010 2030 Consumption Origin of electricity 4 Production and consumption in Montenegro 2010 2030 Origin of electricity Consumption 5 High voltage grids Serbia Bosnia & Herzegovina Montenegro - Max. 400 kV - Max. 400 kV - Max. 400 kV - Ring structure - No ring structure - No ring structure - 6 links to foreign grids - 30 links to foreign grids - 11 links to foreign grids 6 Existing HPPs in Drina river basin SAVA 9 HPPs existing in Drina river basin DRINA CEHOTINA UVAC TARA PIVA LIM 7 Potential HPPs in Drina river basin 37 HPPs conceivably developable in Drina river basin 8 Existing / potential HPPs in Drina river basin Existing HPPs Conceivable HPPs BiH 1 + 2 BiH 9 + 7 Montenegro 1 Montenegro 17 Serbia 5 + 2 Serbia 4 + 7 Total 9 Total 37 1’964 MW Planned HPPs BiH 9 + 7 Montenegro 6 Serbia 3 + 7 Total 25 1’494 MW +76% power 9 Serbia – Present / conceivable HPPs • 2015: 7 HPPs in operation Total = 1’289 MW - Drina River : 2 HPPs Zvornik (96 MW), Bajina Basta HPP (368 MW) *) - Uvac River : 3 HPPs Radoinja (103 MW), Kokin Brod (21 MW), Uvac (36 MW) - Lim River : 1 HPPPotpeć (51 MW) - Pumped-storage PP Bajina Basta PSPP (614 MW) Environmental flow Up to 60 m3/s • 10 projects of new HPPs Total power 781 MW Total cost Ca.
  • Real-Time Flood Forecasting and Warning System Sava River Basin

    Real-Time Flood Forecasting and Warning System Sava River Basin

    Development of Real-Time Flood Forecasting and Warning System for the Sava River Basin Klaas-Jan van Heeringen1, Hanneke Schuurmans2, Mihailo Anđelić3, Victor Simončić4, Imra Hodzic5, Sabina Hadziahmetovic5 ABSTRACT: Disastrous floods in May 2014 in Sava River basin resulted in 79 casualties and substantial economic damage in Croatia, Bosnia, Herzegovina, and Serbia. Assessments of the total damage in the area range up to 3.8 billion Euros. Distressing is the fact that besides flooding the Balkan region recently suffered from severe droughts as well. In order to be more resilient to flood and drought events, data and model output sharing is key. Better information will lead to better decisions. The Flood Forecasting and Warning System (Sava-FFWS) in which five countries jointly work together is at the forefront of transboundary cooperation. The FFWS, which is based on the well-known Delft-FEWS software, lends ample data and information enabling ultimately the decision makers to make right management decisions and implement operational measures to prevent and mitigate severe flood and drought situations on the basis of reliable forecasts of flows and discharges with a long lead time. The paper outlines key components of the Sava-FFWS illustrated with concrete application examples. Key words: real-time flood forecasting, Delft-FEWS, Sava river basin, Sava HIS, hydrological models, hydraulic models, numerical weather prediction, water levels, discharges, precipitation, temperature, snow, GIS data, dissemination Razvoj sistema za prognozu i upozorenje na velike vode u realnom vremenu za sliv reke Save APSTRAKT: Katastrofalne majske poplave iz 2014. godine u slivu reke Save pogodile su delove Bosne i Hercegovine, Hrvatske i Srbije i ostavile iza sebe pustoš: 79 osoba je izgubilo život a ogromna materijalna šteta je procenjena na preko 3.8 milijardi evra.
  • Capacity Assessment Report with Recommendation For

    Capacity Assessment Report with Recommendation For

    List of abbreviations B&H Bosnia and Herzegovina CA Capacity Assessment CB Capacity Building CD Capacity Development IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature LGU Local Governmental Unit MARD Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development MSDT Ministry of Sustainable Development and Tourism MTMA Ministry of Transport and Maritime Affairs MNE Montenegro MU Management unit NEPA Nature and Environmental Protection Agency NGO Non Governmental Organization NPD National Park “Durmitor” NPS National Park “Sutjeska” PAs Protected Areas PENP Public Enterprise “National parks of Montenegro” ANNEXES ANNEX I QUESTIONNAIRE 2 Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 2.OBJECTIVE AND PLANNED RESULTS .................................................................................................................................................................... 6 3. METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 4. ENABLING ENVIRONMENT ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Overview of institutions ..................................................................................................................................................................................................
  • STREAMS of INCOME and JOBS: the Economic Significance of the Neretva and Trebišnjica River Basins

    STREAMS of INCOME and JOBS: the Economic Significance of the Neretva and Trebišnjica River Basins

    STREAMS OF INCOME AND JOBS: The Economic Significance of the Neretva and Trebišnjica River Basins CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 Highlights – The Value of Water for Electricity 5 Highlights – The Value of Water for Agriculture 8 Highlights – The Value of Public Water Supplie 11 Highlights – The Value of Water for Tourism 12 Conclusion: 13 BACKGROUND OF THE BASINS 15 METHODOLOGY 19 LAND USE 21 GENERAL CONTEXT 23 THE VALUE OF WATER FOR ELECTRICITY 29 Background of the Trebišnjica and Neretva hydropower systems 30 Croatia 33 Republika Srpska 35 Federation Bosnia and Herzegovina 37 Montenegro 40 Case study – Calculating electricity or revenue sharing in the Trebišnjica basin 41 Gap Analysis – Water for Electricity 43 THE VALUE OF WATER FOR AGRICULTURE 45 Federation Bosnia and Herzegovina 46 Croatia 51 Case study – Water for Tangerines 55 Case study – Wine in Dubrovnik-Neretva County 56 Case study – Wine in Eastern Herzegovina 57 Republika Srpska 57 Gap Analysis – Water for Agriculture 59 Montenegro 59 THE VALUE OF PUBLIC WATER SUPPLIES 63 Republika Srpska 64 Federation Bosnia and Herzegovina 66 Montenegro 68 Croatia 69 Gap Analysis – Public Water 70 THE VALUE OF WATER FOR TOURISM 71 Croatia 72 CONCLUSION 75 REFERENCES 77 1st edition Author/data analysis: Hilary Drew With contributions from: Zoran Mateljak Data collection, research, and/or translation support: Dr. Nusret Dresković, Nebojša Jerković, Zdravko Mrkonja, Dragutin Sekulović, Petra Remeta, Zoran Šeremet, and Veronika Vlasić Design: Ivan Cigić Published by WWF Adria Supported by the
  • BIRN – Balkan Insight Disappointed Serbs Sell up and Go

    BIRN – Balkan Insight Disappointed Serbs Sell up and Go

    BIRN – Balkan Insight Disappointed Serbs Sell Up And Go 23 06 2006 Angry over the referendum result and fearful for the future, many Serbs are emigrating to central Serbia. By Bojana Stanisic in Pljevlja (Balkan Insight, 23 June 06) The villagers of Seoce, near Andrijevica, in northern Montenegro, are angry. The reason is the outcome of the May 21 referendum on independence, which Montenegrin separatists won by a large margin. Such is the indignation in Seoce, which voted "en masse" against sovereignty, that many locals have decided to sell up and emigrate to Sumadija, in central Serbia. They plan to move the whole village over the border and rename their new home Seoce. Villagers have made it clear that if any one buyer is interested in buying up the entire village, they would offer a substantial discount of up to 15 per cent. One would-be ex-Montenegrin is Stanoje Stijovic. "As soon as I sell my property I will move to Serbia," he said. "We plan to buy a whole village in Serbia and rename it Seoce out of love for our native land." The villagers protest that their departure is not a sign of indifference to the place many were born in, and in which many invested all their savings. "I invested my entire capital in my native village," said Vujica Mitrovic, who came all the way from Denmark, where he works, to vote in the referendum. "But I am deeply disappointed with the result, which is why I have decided to sell my whole estate - three houses in Andrijevica, a house in Seoce, another in Sutomore on the Adriatic coast and a country home in the Balja Mountain." Thirty-five villagers from Beranselo, near the town Berani in the north of Montenegro, have also put up their land and houses for sale, hoping for Albanian buyers.
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina Country Handbook 1

    Bosnia and Herzegovina Country Handbook 1

    Bosnia and Herzegovina Country Handbook 1. This handbook provides basic reference information on Bosnia and Herzegovina, including its geography, history, government, military forces, and communications and transportation networks. This information is intended to familiarize military personnel with local customs and area knowledge to assist them during their assignment to Bosnia and Herzegovina. 2. This product is published under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Defense Intelligence Production Program (DoDIPP) with the Marine Corps Intelligence Activity designated as the community coordinator for the Country Handbook Program. This product reflects the coordinated U.S. Defense Intelligence Community position on Bosnia and Herzegovina. 3. Dissemination and use of this publication is restricted to official military and government personnel from the United States of America, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, NATO member countries, and other countries as required and designated for support of coalition operations. 4. The photos and text reproduced herein have been extracted solely for research, comment, and information reporting, and are intended for fair use by designated personnel in their official duties, including local reproduction for training. Further dissemination of copyrighted material contained in this document, to include excerpts and graphics, is strictly prohibited under Title 17, U.S. Code. Contents KEY FACTS. 1 U.S. MISSION . 2 U.S. Embassy. 2 U.S. Consulate . 2 Entry Requirements . 3 Currency . 3 Customs . 3 GEOGRAPHY AND CLIMATE . 4 Geography . 4 Topography . 5 Vegetation . 8 Effects on Military Operations . 9 Climate. 10 TRANSPORTATION AND COMMUNICATION . 13 Transportation . 13 Roads . 13 Rail . 15 Air . 16 Maritime . 17 Communication . 18 Radio and Television . 18 Telephone and Telegraph .
  • TA-MON-02 FS 400 Kv Dalekovod Lastva Grbaljska

    TA-MON-02 FS 400 Kv Dalekovod Lastva Grbaljska

    Albani ja Bosn a i Hrvatska BJR Mak edoni ja Kosovo Crna Gora Srbija Hercegovina Infrastrukturni projekat Zapadnog Balkana TA-MON-02 FS 400 kV Dalekovod Lastva Grbaljska - Pljevlja Procjena uticaja na društvo i životnu sredinu - Plan angažovanja zainteresovanih strana - Decembar 2011. godine TA-MON-02 Decembar 2011 400 kV dalekovod Lastva Grbaljska – Pljevlja WYG International Ltd SEP – 400 kV dalekovod Lastva Grbaljska - Pljevlja 2 Izvještaj o projektu Naslov projekta: 400 kV DALEKOVOD LASTVA GRBALJSKA - PLJEVLJA Broj projekta: TA-MON-02 Naslov izvještaja: PLAN ANGAŽOVANJA ZAINTERESOVANIH STRANA Broj: DRAFT- 03 Revizija 1 2 3 12. decembar 2011. Datum 30. oktobar 2011.god 30. novembar 2011. god god Detalj Konstantin Siderovski, Konstantin Siderovski, Konstantin Siderovski, Pripremio MSc MSc MSc Garth Entwistle Garth Entwistle Garth Entwistle Božidar Radović / Božidar Radović / Božidar Radović / Provjerio Martyn Osborn Martyn Osborn Martyn Osborn Odobrio TA-MON-02 Decembar 2011 400 kV dalekovod Lastva Grbaljska – Pljevlja WYG International Ltd SEP – 400 kV dalekovod Lastva Grbaljska - Pljevlja 3 Sadržaj: Skraćenice ............................................................................................................................. 4 Uvod ............................................................................................................................. 5 1 Lokacija projekta………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…7 2 Zahjtevi za angažovanjem zainteresovanih strana ..................................................................
  • October 2019 ENVIRONMENT and CLIMATE CHANGE with SET of RECOMMENDATIONS

    October 2019 ENVIRONMENT and CLIMATE CHANGE with SET of RECOMMENDATIONS

    MONITORING REPORT ON CHAPTER 27- October 2019 ENVIRONMENT AND CLIMATE CHANGE WITH SET OF RECOMMENDATIONS For period November 2018- October 2019 THIS PROJECT IS FUNDED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Commission. CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 METHODOLOGY ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 GENERAL OVERVIEW AND ASSESMENT ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 HORIZONTAL LEGISLATION ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 10 Overview and the assessment grid................................................................................................................................................................................................10 Rationale ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
  • Strategy for the Integration of Persons with Disabilities in Montenegro

    Strategy for the Integration of Persons with Disabilities in Montenegro

    INFORMATION ON IMPLEMENTATION OF ACTION PLAN FOR REALIZATION OF STRATEGY FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES IN MONTENEGRO FOR 2010 Podgorica, February 2011. INTRODUCTION The Government of Montenegro adopted in December 2007 the Strategy for integration of persons with disabilities in Montenegro, for the period from 2008. to 2016. This document comprises the following areas: health care, social protection and pension disability insurance, field of education, professional training and employment, accessibility, culture, sport and recreation, as well as the field related to the position of disabled people’s organizations in civil society. The Strategy envisages measures and activities to be undertaken during the aforementioned period, in order to make the position of persons with disability in Montenegro in accordance with the European standards and standards prescribed by the UN Convention on rights of person with disabilities. The Government of Montenegro in 2008. also adopted the Action plan I for 2008. and 2009., which defines priority activities to be implemented in all the above stated fields, while in 2010. it adopted the Action plan II for 2010. and 2011. Also, since 2009. the Government of Montenegro each year has adopted annual reports on realization of measures envisaged for the previous year. In creation of the Report on implementation of the Strategy for integration of persons with disabilities for 2010., also participated an inter-sectoral comprising of, besides representatives of relevant ministries, representatives of NGO dealing with disabled people issues. In this way it was fulfilled a necessity to integrate issues related to disabilities in all sectors, as well as to make direct participation of end beneficiaries, in creation of the policy, while making the strategy and Action plans, and also in monitoring of defined measures and activities.