Annual Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
What's Next for Ukpound Shops?
February 3, 2015 February 3, 2015 What’s Next For UK Pound Shops? Major UK pound shop chains have seen revenues surge in the post-recession years. The economic slump and the Woolworths failure paved the way for this segment’s rapid expansion of stores. With further expansion expected, we think the segment is looking increasingly crowded. Some players are now eying international markets in their bid for growth. DEBORAH WEINSWIG Executive Director–Head Global Retail & Technology Fung Business Intelligence Centre [email protected] New york: 646.839.7017 Fung Business Intelligence Centre (FBIC) publication: UK POUND SHOPS 1 Copyright © 2015 The Fung Group, All rights reserved. February 3, 2015 What’s Next For UK Pound Shops? THE POUND SHOP BOOM Variety-store retailers have proliferated rapidly in the UK, mirroring the store-expansion boom of discount grocery chains (notably Aldi and Lidl), as the low-price, no-frills formula has found particular resonance in Britain’s era of sluggish economic growth. This retail segment encompasses chains like Poundland, 99p Stores and Poundworld, which sell all of their products at fixed price points. Similar to the dollar chains Dollar General and Family Dollar in the US, everything in the pound stores sells for £1 (or 99p) and the goods are bought cheaply in bulk. The group also includes chains with more flexible pricing schemes. Those include B&M Bargains, Home Bargains and Poundstretcher. For both types of stores, the offerings are heavy on beauty and personal care, household fast-moving consumer goods (FMCGs) and food and beverages (particularly confectionery). Other categories typically include do-it-yourself (DIY) and automotive accessories, pet products and seasonal goods. -
Jan Bormeth Vilhelmsen Og Ma
0 ucvbnmqwertyuiopåasdfghjklæøzxcv Executive Summary The master thesis at hand is a study of the Danish retail store chain Tiger and EQT’s decision to acquire a 70% stake in the company. The aim in this thesis is twofold. Firstly, a valuation of Zebra per June 30, 2015, will be conducted. Secondly, an analysis of the value creation during EQT’s ownership period is performed. The main objective in this thesis is to estimate the fair Enterprise Value per June 30, 2015, through a DCF-analysis. Based on Zebra’s strategic position and its historical financial performance, the expected future earnings and cash flow generations were forecasted and resulted in an Enterprise Value of DKK 8,864 million from which the Group accounted for DKK 8,350 million and the Japanese Joint Venture for DKK 515 million. Based on these figures, Zebra’s fair value of equity comprises DKK 7,789 million. Of this figure, EQT’s share of the equity amounts to DKK 5,219 million and DKK 2,874 million when correcting for the 50/50 owned subsidiaries. At EQT’s entry in the beginning of 2013, the purchase price for its stake was DKK 1,600 million, according to different sources, resulting in an IRR for EQT on 26.48% per year. This IRR is satisfying since it is above the expected return for Private Equity investments which historically has a threshold for an IRR on over 20% per year, and in more recent time a threshold between 12-17% per year. The objective in the second part of this thesis is to analyze how EQT has created or destroyed value during its ownership period based on an IRR for Zebra, excluding the Japanese Joint Venture. -
Webinar Presentation Big Lots and Tuesday Morning June 14, 2016
Webinar Presentation Big Lots and Tuesday Morning June 14, 2016 Rafay Khalid, CFA – Senior Industry Analyst CONFIDENTIAL Today’s Agenda 1. Economic Overview 2. Big Lots • Company Profile • Latest Quarterly Results and Financial History • Key Developments and Strategic Initiatives • GCS Observations and Conclusions 3. Tuesday Morning • Company Profile • Latest Quarterly Results and Financial History • Key Developments and Strategic Initiatives • GCS Observations and Conclusions 4. Q&A CONFIDENTIAL 6/14/2016 2 ECONOMIC OVERVIEW GDP Growth CONFIDENTIAL 6/14/2016 3 ECONOMIC OVERVIEW U.S. Unemployment Rate CONFIDENTIAL 6/14/2016 4 ECONOMIC OVERVIEW Retail Sales CONFIDENTIAL 6/14/2016 5 BIG LOTS Overview • We assign Big Lots an elevated risk, “D” credit rating and stable outlook. • Discount retailer – in closeout subsector • History – started in 1967 by Sol Shenk • Today – U.S. retail only segment • Competitors – 99 Cents Only Stores, Dollar General, Dollar Tree, Fred’s, Ross Stores, The TJX Companies, Tuesday Morning CONFIDENTIAL 6/14/2016 6 BIG LOTS Store Overview • Store size – total 30,000 average square feet, selling only 22,000 square feet • Store renewals – 250 average for next three years CONFIDENTIAL 6/14/2016 7 BIG LOTS Merchandise Mix Merchandise Mix FY16 FY15 YOY Change Furniture 22% 20% 2% Consumables 18% 18% 0% Food 16% 16% 0% Seasonal 16% 17% -1% Soft Home 12% 11% 1% Hard Home 9% 10% -1% Electronics & 7% 8% -1% Accessories Total 100% 100% CONFIDENTIAL 6/14/2016 8 BIG LOTS Merchandise Pictures CONFIDENTIAL 6/14/2016 9 BIG LOTS Latest Quarterly Results: Income Statement 3 Months Ended Q117 ($ in millions) 4/30/16 5/2/15 YOY Var. -
Family Dollar for Sale 414 Remi Trail (College Park Road) | Summerville, SC
Family Dollar for Sale 414 Remi Trail (College Park Road) | Summerville, SC Representative Photo Table of Contents FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 414 Remi Trail Hudson Rogers Summerville, SC office 843.203.1658 mobile 843.442.3978 Locator Map ..................................................................3 web [email protected] High Aerial .....................................................................4 Mid Aerial ......................................................................5 125-G Wappoo Creek Drive Site Aerial ......................................................................6 Charleston, SC 29412 Site Plan ........................................................................7 phone (843) 722.9925 fax (843) 722.9947 Elevations ......................................................................8 web twinriverscap.com Survey ............................................................................9 Property Information .................................................. 10 Charleston, SC ........................................................11,12 Tenant & Lease Information ...................................... 13 Financials .................................................................... 14 About Us ...................................................................... 15 Locator Map SUMMERVILLE, SC High Aerial STARBUCKS TRUE LOGOS. GENERATED BY CHI NGUYEN (CHISAGITTA) North Main St. VPD = 28,800 College Park Rd. SITE VPD = 11,700 Mid Aerial College Park Rd. VPD = 11,700 SITE Site Aerial SITE Site -
Deloitte Studie
Global Powers of Retailing 2018 Transformative change, reinvigorated commerce Contents Top 250 quick statistics 4 Retail trends: Transformative change, reinvigorated commerce 5 Retailing through the lens of young consumers 8 A retrospective: Then and now 10 Global economic outlook 12 Top 10 highlights 16 Global Powers of Retailing Top 250 18 Geographic analysis 26 Product sector analysis 30 New entrants 33 Fastest 50 34 Study methodology and data sources 39 Endnotes 43 Contacts 47 Global Powers of Retailing identifies the 250 largest retailers around the world based on publicly available data for FY2016 (fiscal years ended through June 2017), and analyzes their performance across geographies and product sectors. It also provides a global economic outlook and looks at the 50 fastest-growing retailers and new entrants to the Top 250. This year’s report will focus on the theme of “Transformative change, reinvigorated commerce”, which looks at the latest retail trends and the future of retailing through the lens of young consumers. To mark this 21st edition, there will be a retrospective which looks at how the Top 250 has changed over the last 15 years. 3 Top 250 quick statistics, FY2016 5 year retail Composite revenue growth US$4.4 net profit margin (Compound annual growth rate CAGR trillion 3.2% from FY2011-2016) Aggregate retail revenue 4.8% of Top 250 Minimum retail Top 250 US$17.6 revenue required to be retailers with foreign billion among Top 250 operations Average size US$3.6 66.8% of Top 250 (retail revenue) billion Composite year-over-year retail 3.3% 22.5% 10 revenue growth Composite Share of Top 250 Average number return on assets aggregate retail revenue of countries with 4.1% from foreign retail operations operations per company Source: Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited. -
Big Lots, Inc. 2010 Annual Report Financial Highlights (Unaudited Adjusted Results)
Big Lots, Inc. 2010 Annual Report Financial Highlights (Unaudited Adjusted Results) Fiscal Year ($ in thousands, except per share amounts and sales per selling square foot) 2010 2009 2008 Earnings Data Net sales $ 4,952,244 $ 4,726,772 $ 4,645,283 Net sales increase (decrease) 4.8% 1.8% (0.2)% Income from continuing operations (a) $ 222,547 $ 195,627 $ 154,798 Income from continuing operations increase (a) 13.8% 26.4% 6.7% Earnings from continuing operations per share - diluted (a) $ 2.83 $ 2.37 $ 1.89 Earnings from continuing operations per share - diluted increase (a) 19.4% 25.4% 34.0% Average diluted common shares outstanding (000's) 78,581 82,681 82,076 Gross margin - % of net sales 40.6% 40.6% 40.0% Selling and administrative expenses - % of net sales (a) 31.8% 32.3% 32.8% Depreciation expense - % of net sales 1.6% 1.6% 1.7% Operating profit - % of net sales (a) 7.2% 6.7% 5.5% Net interest expense - % of net sales 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% Income from continuing operations - % of net sales (a) 4.5% 4.1% 3.3% Balance Sheet Data and Financial Ratios Cash and cash equivalents $ 177,539 $ 283,733 $ 34,773 Inventories 762,146 731,337 736,616 Property and equipment - net 524,906 491,256 490,041 Total assets 1,619,599 1,669,493 1,432,458 Borrowings under bank credit facility - - 61,700 Shareholders’ equity 946,793 1,001,412 774,845 Working capital (b) $ 509,788 $ 580,446 $ 355,776 Current ratio 1.9 2.1 1.7 Inventory turnover 3.6 3.7 3.6 Bank borrowings to total capitalization 0.0% 0.0% 7.4% Return on assets - continuing operations (a) 13.5% 12.6% 10.8% -
2021 CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY REPORT Statements Contained Herein Asrepresenting the Company’S Asofanydate Views Subsequentto Thedate Ofthisreport
1 DOLLAR TREE I FAMILYD>LLM . CORPORATE 2021 SUSTAINABILITY REPORT TWO BRANDS, ENDLESS POSSIBILITIES Contents MISSION STATEMENT 2 CEO LETTER 3 WHO WE ARE 5 OUR ESG JOURNEY 9 COVID-19 RESPONSE 11 ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP 16 SOCIAL IMPACT 25 PRODUCT SAFETY & SUPPLY CHAIN 36 GOVERNANCE & ETHICS 41 APPENDIX 50 Statements in this Corporate Sustainability Report and Dollar Tree, Inc.’s website regarding the company’s Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) initiatives and future operating results, outlook, growth, plans, and business strategies, including statements regarding projected savings and anticipated improvements to the company’s business and ESG metrics as a result of its initiatives and programs, as well as any other statements that are not related to present facts or current conditions or that are not purely historical, constitute forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on the company’s historical performance and its plans, estimates, and expectations as of April 1, 2021. Forward- CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY REPORT SUSTAINABILITYREPORT CORPORATE looking statements are not guarantees that the future results, plans, intentions, or expectations expressed or implied 2021 2021 by the company will be achieved. Matters subject to forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, including economic, legislative, regulatory, competitive, and other factors, which may cause actual financial or operating results, levels of activity, or the timing of events to be materially diferent than those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause or contribute to such diferences include execution of the company’s plans and its success in realizing the benefits expected to result from its initiatives and programs, including its FAMILY DOLLAR FAMILY | sustainability initiatives, and the other factors set forth in Part I, “Item 1A. -
21361 Would You Trust a Machine New Layout Layout 1
WOULD YOU The OC&C Retail TRUST A Proposition Index MACHINE?2013 An OC&C Insight Taking on the Machines<#> WOULD YOU TRUST A MACHINE? THE OC&C PROPOSITION INDEX 2013 This is the fourth year of the OC&C Proposition Index, a major piece of consumer research into shopper attitudes towards the world’s leading retailers. Consumers are asked WINNER to rate the retailers they have shopped on the strength of OVERALL their overall proposition, and then to score the key elements PROPOSITION of that proposition (Price, Range, Service, etc). The results are then used to compile a ranking of consumers’ favourite retailers from across the globe. The OC&C Proposition Index continues to grow, this year capturing 300,000 ratings from over 30,000 consumers 2ND PLACE 3RD PLACE OVERALL OVERALL regarding nearly 600 retailers across 9 countries. This PROPOSITION PROPOSITION combination of breadth and depth gives a powerful view into the relative strength of retail propositions across the world. Virtual Reality Check It is no longer a surprise that Amazon stands In Germany, Amazon’s second largest global Germany Germany YoY atop our global index. In 2010, when we market and historically its strongest territory 2013 2012 Change released the first OC&C Proposition Index, in the OC&C Proposition Index, its crown has Rank Rank in Rating there was genuine shock in some quarters very much slipped. Recent labour disputes that an online player had already usurped with warehouse workers and subsequent Overall Rating 2 1 -8 large household names as the world’s strikes have tainted the company’s Low Prices 12 6 -5 favourite retailer. -
Operating Leases on Balance Sheet, Listing Those Costs As Liabilities
Operating Lease Disclosures: New Standard’s Effect on Large Retail Firms October 2019 PA G E 1 Background ASC 842, Leases, is a new accounting standard that went into effect for most publicly traded firms at the start of 2019. • Firms must report: • cost of operating leases on balance sheet, listing those costs as liabilities. Previously reported in the notes to the financial statements. • corresponding right-of-use (ROU) asset on asset side of balance sheet. This is the first time firms have reported ROU assets. We observe significant spikes in assets and liabilities, due to reporting changes under the new standard. These changes significantly impacted return on assets, debt-to-equity, and other key performance metrics. The adoption of ASC 842 creates a significant challenge for investors in interpreting and accounting for its impact. What We Did Calcbench reviewed lease disclosures reported by 36 large retailers firms in Q2 2019. Retailers can be especially sensitive to ASC 842, given their heavy reliance on leased real estate for operations. ● Examined all operating lease liabilities and ROU assets reported on balance sheet; ● Calculated the standard’s effect on firms’ total liabilities and assets; ● Calculated changes in the firms’ return on assets and debt to equity ratios; ● Examined reported discount rates and average remaining leasing terms. Firms We Studied Abercrombie & Fitch Conn’s Gap Inc. Michaels Companies American Eagle Outfitters CVS Health Home Depot Nordstrom Inc. Bed Bath & Beyond Designer Brands J C Penney Co. Ollie's Bargain Outlet Best Buy Dick’s Sporting Goods Kohl’s Ross Stores Big 5 Sporting Goods Dillard's Kroger’s Signet Jewelers Ltd. -
IN the COURT of CHANCERY of the STATE of DELAWARE in RE FAMILY DOLLAR STORES, INC. STOCKHOLDER LITIGATION Consol. CA No. 9985
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE FAMILY DOLLAR STORES, INC. Consol. C.A. No. 9985-CB STOCKHOLDER LITIGATION MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: December 5, 2014 Date Decided: December 19, 2014 Seth D. Rigrodsky, Brian D. Long, Gina M. Serra and Jeremy J. Riley of RIGRODSKY & LONG, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; Peter B. Andrews and Craig J. Springer of ANDREWS & SPRINGER LLC, Wilmington, Delaware; Donald J. Enright and Elizabeth K. Tripodi of LEVI & KORSINSKY, LLP, Washington, DC; Kent A. Bronson and Gloria Kui Melwani of MILBERG LLP, New York, New York; Counsel for Plaintiffs. William M. Lafferty, John P. DiTomo and Lauren K. Neal of MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP, Wilmington, Delaware; Mitchell A. Lowenthal, Meredith Kotler and Matthew Gurgel of CLEARY GOTTLIEB STEEN & HAMILTON, LLP, New York, New York; Counsel for Defendants Family Dollar Stores, Inc., Mark R. Bernstein, Pamela L. Davies, Sharon Allred Decker, Edward C. Dolby, Glenn A. Eisenberg, Edward P. Garden, Howard R. Levine, George R. Mahoney, Jr., James G. Martin, Harvey Morgan, Dale C. Pond. Gregory P. Williams, A. Jacob Werrett, J. Scott Pritchard and Sarah A. Clark of RICHARDS, LAYTON & FINGER, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; William Savitt, Andrew J.H. Cheung and A.J. Martinez of WACHTELL, LIPTON, ROSEN & KATZ, New York, New York; Counsel for Defendants Dollar Tree, Inc. and Dime Merger Sub, Inc. BOUCHARD, C. I. INTRODUCTION This action involves a proposed merger between two of the three major players in the small-box discount retail market where the third major player has surfaced as a competing bidder. -
Schedule 14A Ollie's Bargain Outlet Holdings, Inc
TABLE OF CONTENTS UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 SCHEDULE 14A (RULE 14a-101) PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(A) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Filed by the Registrant ☒ Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐ Check the appropriate box: ☐ Preliminary Proxy Statement ☐ Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) ☒ Definitive Proxy Statement ☐ Definitive Additional Materials ☐ Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 OLLIE’S BARGAIN OUTLET HOLDINGS, INC. (Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter) PAYMENT OF FILING FEE (CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX): ☒ No fee required. ☐ Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. (1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: (2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: (3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): (4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of the transaction: (5) Total fee paid: ☐ Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. ☐ Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. (1) Amount Previously Paid: (2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: (3) Filing Party: (4) Date Filed: TABLE OF CONTENTS OLLIE’S BARGAIN OUTLET HOLDINGS, INC. -
Small Box Retail Diversity Study
Small Box Retail Diversity Study City of New Orleans City Planning Commission Robert D. Rivers, Executive Director Leslie T. Alley, Deputy Director Prepared on: November 27, 2018 Revised on: December 18, 2018 Prepared By: Emily Ramírez Hernández Travis Martin Sabine Lebailleux Paul Cramer Aspen Nero James Gillie Amos Wright Table of Contents A. Executive Summary....................................................................................................... 3 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 3 Key Findings ............................................................................................................................................... 4 Recommendations ................................................................................................................................... 6 Next Steps ................................................................................................................................................. 12 B. Scope of Study ............................................................................................................. 14 Motion (As Corrected) No. M-18-256 ............................................................................................. 14 Study Goals ............................................................................................................................................... 16 C. Small Box Discount Retail Overview ........................................................................