DOCSLIB.ORG

Generation of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Neurons from Human Pluripotent Stem Cells

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Generation of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Neurons from Human Pluripotent Stem Cells University of Helsinki Faculty of Medicine GENERATION OF GONADOTROPIN-RELEASING HORMONE NEURONS FROM HUMAN PLURIPOTENT STEM CELLS Carina Lund The Doctoral School in Health Sciences, Doctoral Programme Brain and Mind Stem cells and Metabolism Research Program, Research Programs Unit University of Helsinki Finland Academic dissertation To be presented for public discussion with the permission of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Helsinki, in Aurora, Room 230, Siltavuorenpenger 10, on the 29th of May, 2020 at 12 o’clock. Helsinki 2020 University of Helsinki Faculty of Medicine Doctoral Programme Brain and Mind Department of Physiology Biomedicum Helsinki Supervised by Professor Taneli Raivio Stem Cells and Metabolism Research Program, Research programs unit Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Finland Pediatric Research Center, New Children’s Hospital Helsinki University Hospital, Finland Docent Timo Tuuri Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Helsinki University Hospital, Finland Reviewed by Professor Johanna Ivaska Department of Biochemistry, University of Turku, Finland Professor Seppo Vainio, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, University of Oulu, Finland Opponent Professor Marcelo N. Rivolta Centre for Stem Cell Biology, Department of Biomedical Science, University of Sheffield, United Kingdom ISBN 978-951-51-6111-6 (paperback) ISBN 978-951-51-6112-3 (PDF) Unigrafia Oy Helsinki 2020 https://ethesis.helsinki.fi/ The Faculty of Medicine uses the Urkund system (plagiarism recognition) to examine all doctoral dissertations. 2 ABSTRACT.............................................................................................................................................5 LIST OF ORIGINAL PUBLICATIONS....................................................................................................6 ABBREVIATIONS ..................................................................................................................................7 INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................................9 REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE............................................................................................................9 1. HUMAN PLURIPOTENT STEM CELLS AS A RESEARCH TOOL ................................................................9 Blastocyst stage embryos ...................................................................................................9 Embryonic stem cells in vitro...............................................................................................9 Human embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells ....................................10 Development of culture conditions and differentiation techniques....................................11 Directing neuronal differentiation ......................................................................................12 2. THE HUMAN REPRODUCTIVE AXIS..................................................................................................15 Hormonal regulation of puberty and fertility ......................................................................15 Regulation of GnRH secretion in the hypothalamus .........................................................16 3. PUBERTY ....................................................................................................................................17 Congenital Hypogonadotropic Hypogonadism and Kallmann Syndrome.........................17 Foetal development of the HPG axis ................................................................................17 Minipuberty........................................................................................................................18 Delayed puberty ................................................................................................................19 Associated phenotypes and genetics of CHH...................................................................19 4. DEVELOPMENT AND ORIGIN OF GNRH NEURONS ...........................................................................20 Craniofacial development..................................................................................................21 Neural crest .......................................................................................................................21 Neural crest induction at the neural plate border ..............................................................22 4.3.1 BMP signalling pathway.............................................................................................................. 23 4.3.2 Wnt signalling pathway ............................................................................................................... 23 Neural crest cell multipotency ...........................................................................................23 Notch signalling and neural crest development ................................................................24 4.5.1 Notch signalling pathway ............................................................................................................ 25 Specification of preplacodal ectoderm ..............................................................................26 Development of the olfactory placodes.............................................................................27 Neurogenesis in the olfactory placode..............................................................................30 Origin of GnRH neurons?..................................................................................................31 Emergence and migratory path of GnRH neurons during embryogenesis .......................34 How is GnRH neuron migration regulated? ......................................................................36 AIMS .....................................................................................................................................................38 MATERIALS AND METHODS .............................................................................................................39 Ethical consideration .........................................................................................................39 5. ARTICLE I....................................................................................................................................39 Culture and maintenance of human pluripotent stem cells and DNA transfections..........39 shRNA-mediated knockdown of JAG1 and overexpression of human NICD1 .................39 Neural crest, neural lineage and mesenchymal derivative differentiation.........................39 Immunocytochemistry .......................................................................................................40 Flow cytometry ..................................................................................................................40 Migration assay .................................................................................................................40 Microarray transcription profiles ........................................................................................40 Reverse transcription and real-time PCR .........................................................................41 Chromatin immunoprecipitation ........................................................................................41 6. ARTICLE II...................................................................................................................................41 Cell lines............................................................................................................................41 Differentiation procedure...................................................................................................42 Analysis of GnRH Expression and Secretion....................................................................42 Human samples immunohistochemistry ...........................................................................42 3 7. ARTICLE III..................................................................................................................................43 Generation of GNRH1-TdTomato reporter cell line ..........................................................43 Electroporations and expansion of the reporter clones ....................................................43 Screening for reporter integration .....................................................................................43 Differentiation ....................................................................................................................44 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting...................................................................................44 Quantitative polymerase chain reaction............................................................................44 Immunocytochemistry .......................................................................................................44 Human tissue collection and immunohistrochemistry .......................................................45 RNA sequencing ...............................................................................................................45 7.10 RNA sequencing data analyses............................................................................................45 RESULTS..............................................................................................................................................46
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Comparative Analysis of a Teleost Skeleton Transcriptome Provides Insight Into Its Regulation
    Accepted Manuscript Comparative analysis of a teleost skeleton transcriptome provides insight into its regulation Florbela A. Vieira, M.A.S. Thorne, K. Stueber, M. Darias, R. Reinhardt, M.S. Clark, E. Gisbert, D.M. Power PII: S0016-6480(13)00264-5 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2013.05.025 Reference: YGCEN 11541 To appear in: General and Comparative Endocrinology Please cite this article as: Vieira, F.A., Thorne, M.A.S., Stueber, K., Darias, M., Reinhardt, R., Clark, M.S., Gisbert, E., Power, D.M., Comparative analysis of a teleost skeleton transcriptome provides insight into its regulation, General and Comparative Endocrinology (2013), doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2013.05.025 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. 1 Comparative analysis of a teleost skeleton transcriptome 2 provides insight into its regulation 3 4 Florbela A. Vieira1§, M. A. S. Thorne2, K. Stueber3, M. Darias4,5, R. Reinhardt3, M. 5 S. Clark2, E. Gisbert4 and D. M. Power1 6 7 1Center of Marine Sciences, Universidade do Algarve, Faro, Portugal. 8 2British Antarctic Survey – Natural Environment Research Council, High Cross, 9 Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0ET, UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Mechanisms Regulating Mammalian Forebrain Development
    Molecular Mechanisms Regulating Mammalian Forebrain Development By David Chun Cheong Tsui A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Institute of Medical Science University of Toronto © Copyright by David Chun Cheong Tsui (2013) Title: Molecular Mechanisms Regulating Mammalian Forebrain Development Name: David Chun Cheong Tsui Degree: Doctor of Philosophy, 2013 Department: Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Toronto ABSTRACT While the extrinsic factors regulating neurogenesis in the developing forebrain have been widely studied, the mechanisms downstream of the various signaling pathways are relatively ill-defined. In particular, we focused on proteins that have been implicated in cognitive dysfunction. Here, we ask what role two cell intrinsic factors play in the development of two different neurogenic compartments in the forebrain. In the first part of the thesis, the transcription factor FoxP2, which is mutated in individuals who have specific language deficits, was identified to regulate neurogenesis in the developing cortex, in part by regulating the transition from the radial precursors to the transit amplifying intermediate progenitors. Moreover, we found that ectopic expression of the human homologue of the protein promotes neurogenesis in the murine cortex, thereby acting as a gain-of-function isoform. In the second part of the thesis, the histone acetyltransferase CREB-binding protein (CBP) was identified as regulating the generation of neurons from medial ganglionic eminence precursors, similar to its role in the developing cortex. But CBP also plays a more substantial role in the expression of late interneuron markers, suggesting that it is continuously required for the various stages of neurogenesis at least in the ventral neurogenic niche.
    [Show full text]
  • The Roles of RNA Polymerase I and III Subunits Polr1a, Polr1c, and Polr1d in Craniofacial Development BY
    The roles of RNA Polymerase I and III subunits Polr1a, Polr1c, and Polr1d in craniofacial development BY © 2016 Kristin Emily Noack Watt Submitted to the graduate degree program in Anatomy and Cell Biology and to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Kansas Medical Center in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Paul Trainor, Co-Chairperson Brenda Rongish, Co-Chairperson Brian Andrews Jennifer Gerton Tatjana Piotrowski Russell Swerdlow Date Defended: January 26, 2016 The Dissertation Committee for Kristin Watt certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: The roles of RNA Polymerase I and III subunits Polr1a, Polr1c, and Polr1d in craniofacial development Paul Trainor, Co-Chairperson Brenda Rongish, Co-Chairperson Date approved: February 2, 2016 ii Abstract Craniofacial anomalies account for approximately one-third of all birth defects. Two examples of syndromes associated with craniofacial malformations are Treacher Collins syndrome and Acrofacial Dysostosis, Cincinnati type which have phenotypic overlap including deformities of the eyes, ears, and facial bones. Mutations in TCOF1, POLR1C or POLR1D may cause Treacher Collins syndrome while mutations in POLR1A may cause Acrofacial Dysostosis, Cincinnati type. TCOF1 encodes the nucleolar phosphoprotein Treacle, which functions in rRNA transcription and modification. Previous studies demonstrated that Tcof1 mutations in mice result in reduced ribosome biogenesis and increased neuroepithelial apoptosis. This diminishes the neural crest cell (NCC) progenitor population which contribute to the development of the cranial skeleton. In contrast, apart from being subunits of RNA Polymerases (RNAP) I and/or III, nothing is known about the function of POLR1A, POLR1C, and POLR1D during embryonic and craniofacial development.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulation of Cell Fate Decisions in the Developing Forebrain by DLX
    Regulation of cell fate decisions in the developing forebrain by DLX transcription factors by Mikaela Nevin A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Medical Sciences- Medical Genetics University of Alberta © Mikaela Nevin, 2020 Abstract Introduction The Dlx1/Dlx2 double knockout (DKO) mouse exhibits major defects in forebrain development including a block in differentiation and migration of GABAergic interneurons from the subpallium to the cortex. In addition, the Dlx1/Dlx2 DKO mouse generates more oligodendrocyte progenitor cells (OPC) during forebrain development, and this occurs at the expense of interneuron generation. This phenotype suggests a role for DLX genes in mediating the neuronal-glial cell fate switch in the developing forebrain. Furthermore, expression of many oligodendroglial lineage genes is increased and occurs earlier in the DKO forebrain. As such, we hypothesized that DLX2 actively represses acquisition of oligodendroglial cell fate in a subset of forebrain neural progenitor cells by direct transcriptional repression of multiple genes required for oligodendroglial development. Here, I aimed to determine whether DLX2 represses expression of the oligodendroglial lineage genes Myt1 and Plp1 during forebrain development. In order to further characterise this gene regulatory network, I also investigated regulation of Plp1 by MYT1. I also investigated whether DLX2 may play a role in regulating progenitor cell fate in the pediatric brain tumour Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma (DIPG). Methods Chromatin immunoprecipitation with a polyclonal DLX2 antibody was performed on E13.5 mouse forebrain chromatin to determine whether DLX2 occupied candidate promoter regulatory regions of the Myt1 and Plp1 promoters, and with an MYT1 antibody on E14.5 and E18.5 forebrain to determine if MYT1 occupied candidate regulatory regions of the Plp1 promoter.
    [Show full text]
  • DLX Genes: Roles in Development and Cancer
    cancers Review DLX Genes: Roles in Development and Cancer Yinfei Tan 1,* and Joseph R. Testa 1,2,* 1 Genomics Facility, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA 2 Cancer Signaling and Epigenetics Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA * Correspondence: [email protected] (Y.T.); [email protected] (J.R.T.) Simple Summary: DLX homeobox family genes encode transcription factors that have indispensable roles in embryonic and postnatal development. These genes are critically linked to the morphogene- sis of craniofacial structures, branchial arches, forebrain, and sensory organs. DLX genes are also involved in postnatal homeostasis, particularly hematopoiesis and, when dysregulated, oncogen- esis. DLX1/2, DLX3/4, and DLX5/6 exist as bigenes on different chromosomes, sharing intergenic enhancers between gene pairs, which allows orchestrated spatiotemporal expression. Genomic alterations of human DLX gene enhancers or coding sequences result in congenital disorders such as split-hand/foot malformation. Aberrant postnatal expression of DLX genes is associated with hematological malignancies, including leukemias and lymphomas. In several mouse models of T-cell lymphoma, Dlx5 has been shown to act as an oncogene by cooperating with activated Akt, Notch1/3, and/or Wnt to drive tumor formation. In humans, DLX5 is aberrantly expressed in lung and ovarian carcinomas and holds promise as a therapeutic target. Abstract: Homeobox genes control body patterning and cell-fate decisions during development. The homeobox genes consist of many families, only some of which have been investigated regarding a possible role in tumorigenesis. Dysregulation of HOX family genes have been widely implicated in cancer etiology.
    [Show full text]
  • Upregulation of DLX5 Promotes Ovarian Cancer Cell Proliferation by Enhancing IRS-2-AKT Signaling
    Published OnlineFirst November 2, 2010; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-1568 Published OnlineFirst on November 2, 2010 as 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-1568 Molecular and Cellular Pathobiology Cancer Research Upregulation of DLX5 Promotes Ovarian Cancer Cell Proliferation by Enhancing IRS-2-AKT Signaling Yinfei Tan1, Mitchell Cheung1, Jianming Pei1, Craig W. Menges1, Andrew K. Godwin2, and Joseph R. Testa1 Abstract The distal-less homeobox gene (dlx) 5 encodes a transcription factor that controls jaw formation and appendage differentiation during embryonic development. We had previously found that Dlx5 is overexpressed in an Akt2 transgenic model of T-cell lymphoma. To investigate if DLX5 is involved in human cancer, we screened its expression in the NCI 60 cancer cell line panel. DLX5 was frequently upregulated in cell lines derived from several tumor types, including ovarian cancer. We next validated its upregulation in primary ovarian cancer specimens. Stable knockdown of DLX5 by lentivirus-mediated transduction of short hairpin RNA (shRNA) resulted in reduced proliferation of ovarian cancer cells due to inhibition of cell cycle progres- sion in connection with the downregulation of cyclins A, B1, D1, D2, and E, and decreased phosphorylation of AKT. Cell proliferation resumed following introduction of a DLX5 cDNA harboring wobbled mutations at the shRNA-targeting sites. Cell proliferation was also rescued by transduction of a constitutively active form of AKT. Intriguingly, downregulation of IRS-2 and MET contributed to the suppression of AKT signaling. More- over, DLX5 was found to directly bind to the IRS-2 promoter and augmented its transcription. Knockdown of DLX5 in xenografts of human ovarian cancer cells resulted in markedly diminished tumor size.
    [Show full text]
  • Dlx1 and Dlx2 Function Is Necessary for Terminal Differentiation And
    Research article 311 Dlx1 and Dlx2 function is necessary for terminal differentiation and survival of late-born retinal ganglion cells in the developing mouse retina Jimmy de Melo1, Guoyan Du2,3, Mario Fonseca2,3, Leigh-Anne Gillespie3, William J. Turk3, John L. R. Rubenstein4 and David D. Eisenstat1,2,3,5,* 1Department of Human Anatomy and Cell Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3E 3J7, Canada 2Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3A 1S1, Canada 3Manitoba Institute of Cell Biology, Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3E 0V9, Canada 4Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA 5Department of Ophthalmology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3E 0V9, Canada *Author for correspondence (e-mail: [email protected]) Accepted 3 November 2004 Development 132, 311-322 Published by The Company of Biologists 2005 doi:10.1242/dev.01560 Summary Dlx homeobox genes, the vertebrate homologs of Distal- Ectopic expression of Crx, the cone and rod photoreceptor less, play important roles in the development of the homeobox gene, in the GCL and neuroblastic layers of the vertebrate forebrain, craniofacial structures and limbs. mutants may signify altered cell fate of uncommitted RGC Members of the Dlx gene family are also expressed in progenitors. However, amacrine and horizontal cell retinal ganglion cells (RGC), amacrine and horizontal cells differentiation is relatively unaffected in the Dlx1/2 null of the developing and postnatal retina. Expression begins retina. Herein, we propose a model whereby early-born at embryonic day 12.5 and is maintained until late RGCs are Dlx1 and Dlx2 independent, but Dlx function is embryogenesis for Dlx1, while Dlx2 expression extends to necessary for terminal differentiation of late-born RGC adulthood.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Basis for Intellectual Disability and Epilepsy: Role of the Human Homeobox Gene ARX
    I , I l¡ \-lN I ìo Molecular Basis for Intellectual Disability and Epilepsy: Role of the Human Homeobox Gene ARX A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy to the University of Adelaide by Desiree Cloosterman BSc (Hons) school of Medicine, Department of Paediatrics, university of Adelaide November 2005 ll ,rlf the human brain were so simple that we coultl understønd it, we woukl be so simple thøt we couldn't" Emerson M. Pugh lll CONTENTS Summary IV Statement and Declaration v vl Acknowledgements..--- ------ --- List of Abbreviations vlll CHAPTER I Introduction-----------.-- 1 CHAPTER 2 Materials and Methods- 43 CHAPTER 3 Conservation of ARX. _.__-_._.1 10 CHAPTER 4 Yeast Two-Hybrid Screening __-_--_ I 33 CHAPTER 5 Confirmation of Y2H Interactions 176 CHAPTER 6 ZebrafishKnockdown Model------.- 203 CHAPTER 7 Conclusions 237 References lv SUMMARY Mental retardation (MR) is estimated to affect 2-3Yo of the population and is caused by both environmental and genetic factors. Mutations in Ihe Aristaless-related homeobox gene (AR$ have been found in numerous families with X-linked MR with and without other clinical features including infantile spasms, dystonia, lissencephaly, autism and dysarthria. The aim of this study was to investigate the normal function of the ARX protein within a cellular environment and in development. Discernment of ARX function will improve our understanding about the molecular pathology of intellectual disability and epilepsy, as well as improve our knowledge of the genes and mechanisms required for normal brain development. The first part of the thesis addressed the conservation of ARX domains and polyalanine regions by the identification and analysis of characterized and novel ARX orthologs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Cell-Specific Reelin Depletion in Inhibitory Interneurons on the Dentate Gyrus of Adult Mice (Mus Musculus, Linnaeus 1758)
    The effects of cell-specific Reelin depletion in inhibitory interneurons on the dentate gyrus of adult mice (Mus musculus, Linnaeus 1758) Dissertation with the aim of achieving the doctoral degree doctor rerum naturalium (Dr. rer. nat.) at the Faculty of Mathematics, Informatics and Natural Sciences Department of Biology of the University of Hamburg Submitted by Jasmine Pahle from Hochstadt/Pfalz Hamburg, 2019 Day of the oral defence: 21st February, 2020 The following evaluators recommend the admission of the dissertation: Gutachter 1/ evaluator 1: Prof. Dr. Christian Lohr Martin-Luther-King-Platz 3 20146 Hamburg Gutachter 2/ evaluator 2: Prof. Dr. Matthias Kneussel Falkenried 94 20251 Hamburg Declaration on oath I hereby declare, on oath, that I have written the present dissertation by my own and have not used other than the acknowledged resources and aids. Hamburg, 4th of November 2019 _________________________ Jasmine Pahle Eine Erkenntnis von heute kann die Tochter eines Irrtums von gestern sein. The knowledge of today can be the daughter of a fallacy from yesterday. Marie von Ebner-Eschenbach (*1830- †1916) (Schriftstellerin/ author) Abstract Abstract The highly conserved brain matrix protein Reelin is a very important conductor in the well- orchestrated process of brain development. As guidance cue for new born migrating neurons, influencer on cytoskeleton functions or modulator for N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors at synapses, the glycoprotein Reelin plays a critical role. However, little is known about Reelin function in adulthood. Previous studies proposed a participation of Reelin in diseases emerging at adolescence or adulthood. They reported altered amounts of Reelin mRNA and protein in brains of patients suffering from schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, depression, temporal lobe epilepsy and Alzheimer's disease.
    [Show full text]
  • Implications for Genomic and Morphological Evolution of Jawed Vertebrates
    Copyright © 2005 by the Genetics Society of America DOI: 10.1534/genetics.104.031831 The Dlx Gene Complement of the Leopard Shark, Triakis semifasciata, Resembles That of Mammals: Implications for Genomic and Morphological Evolution of Jawed Vertebrates David W. Stock1 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309-0334 Manuscript received May 31, 2004 Accepted for publication October 29, 2004 ABSTRACT Extensive gene duplication is thought to have occurred in the vertebrate lineage after it diverged from cephalochordates and before the divergence of lobe- and ray-finned fishes, but the exact timing remains obscure. This timing was investigated by analysis of the Dlx gene family of a representative cartilaginous fish, the leopard shark, Triakis semifasciata. Dlx genes encode homeodomain transcription factors and are arranged in mammals as three convergently transcribed bigene clusters. Six Dlx genes were cloned from Triakis and shown to be orthologous to single mammalian Dlx genes. At least four of these are arranged in bigene clusters. Phylogenetic analyses of Dlx genes were used to propose an evolutionary scenario in which two genome duplications led to four Dlx bigene clusters in a common ancestor of jawed vertebrates, one of which was lost prior to the diversification of the group. Dlx genes are known to be involved in jaw development, and changes in Dlx gene number are mapped to the same branch of the vertebrate tree as the origin of jaws. OMPARISONS of vertebrate and invertebrate ans (Amores et al. 1998, 2004; Prince 2002; Wagner C gene families have provided evidence for large- et al.
    [Show full text]
  • GAD and Dlx Genes 247
    Development 129, 245-252 (2002) 245 Printed in Great Britain © The Company of Biologists Limited 2002 DEV9788 Ectopic expression of the Dlx genes induces glutamic acid decarboxylase and Dlx expression Thorsten Stühmer1, Stewart A. Anderson1, Marc Ekker2 and John L. R. Rubenstein1,* 1Nina Ireland Laboratory of Developmental Neurobiology, Department of Psychiatry, LPPI, University of California at San Francisco, 401 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94143-0984, USA 2Loeb Medical Research Institute, University of Ottawa, 1053 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario K1Y 4E9, Canada *Author for correspondence (e-mail: [email protected]) Accepted 17 October 2001 SUMMARY The expression of the Dlx homeobox genes is closely decarboxylases (GADs), the enzymes that synthesize associated with neurons that express γ-aminobutyric acid GABA. We also used this method to show cross-regulation (GABA) in the embryonic rostral forebrain. To test between different Dlx family members. We find that Dlx2 whether the Dlx genes are sufficient to induce some aspects can induce Dlx5 expression, and that Dlx1, Dlx2 and Dlx5 of the phenotype of GABAergic neurons, we adapted the can induce expression from a Dlx5/6-lacZ enhancer/ electroporation method to ectopically express DLX reporter construct. proteins in slice cultures of the mouse embryonic cerebral cortex. This approach showed that ectopic expression of Key words: Dlx, Electroporation, Forebrain, GABA, Glutamic acid Dlx2 and Dlx5 induced the expression of glutamic acid decarboxylase, Mouse INTRODUCTION neurons arise from distinct telencephalic progenitor zones and are under distinct genetic controls (Anderson et al., 1997b; Recent evidence suggests that neurotransmitter subtype Anderson et al., 1999; Anderson et al., 2001; Bulfone et al., specification is linked to dorsoventral patterning (Marín et al., 1998; Parnavelas, 2000; Hevner et al., 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • A Symphony of Inner Ear Developmental Control Genes Sumantra Chatterjee1,2, Petra Kraus1, Thomas Lufkin1,2*
    Chatterjee et al. BMC Genetics 2010, 11:68 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2156/11/68 REVIEW Open Access A symphony of inner ear developmental control genes Sumantra Chatterjee1,2, Petra Kraus1, Thomas Lufkin1,2* Abstract The inner ear is one of the most complex and detailed organs in the vertebrate body and provides us with the priceless ability to hear and perceive linear and angular acceleration (hence maintain balance). The development and morphogenesis of the inner ear from an ectodermal thickening into distinct auditory and vestibular compo- nents depends upon precise temporally and spatially coordinated gene expression patterns and well orchestrated signaling cascades within the otic vesicle and upon cellular movements and interactions with surrounding tissues. Gene loss of function analysis in mice has identified homeobox genes along with other transcription and secreted factors as crucial regulators of inner ear morphogenesis and development. While otic induction seems dependent upon fibroblast growth factors, morphogenesis of the otic vesicle into the distinct vestibular and auditory compo- nents appears to be clearly dependent upon the activities of a number of homeobox transcription factors. The Pax2 paired-homeobox gene is crucial for the specification of the ventral otic vesicle derived auditory structures and the Dlx5 and Dlx6 homeobox genes play a major role in specification of the dorsally derived vestibular struc- tures. Some Micro RNAs have also been recently identified which play a crucial role in the inner ear formation. Review sound or movement- as well as surrounding supporting Introduction cells. Damage to this small population of hair cells is a Imagine yourself at a symphony concert in the midst of major cause of hearing loss.
    [Show full text]