1 a Metic Was a Metic in Classical Athens, an Immigrant Who Stayed

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1 a Metic Was a Metic in Classical Athens, an Immigrant Who Stayed A Metic was a Metic ABSTRACT: In Classical Athens, an immigrant who stayed longer than about a month was required to register a citizen as prostates and to commence paying the metoikion. So were freed slaves. A recent study treats these freeborn and freedman metics as distinct legal types of resident alien. Athenian law did not. In Classical Athens, an immigrant who stayed longer than about a month was required to register a citizen as prostates and to commence paying the metoikion.1 Likewise, freed slaves were to register prostatai and pay the metoikion.2 A recent study of Athenian status groups treats these freeborn and freedman metics as distinct legal “subcategories of resident alien.”3 Athenian law, I argue, did not. *** Harpokration defines metic with a pair of criteria (µὲν…δὲ); first, a metic is “one who changes residence from one city to another, and not briefly visiting as a foreigner but having established residence there.”4 This alone cannot have functioned as a prescriptive legal test.5 The second part is similarly descriptive: “And twelve drachmas each year used to be paid by them, which was called “metoikion.”” Aristophanes of Byzantium also focused on the twin criteria of domicile and taxation: “A metic is whenever a person, having come from a foreign (polis) takes up residence in the polis, paying a tax toward certain appointed uses of the city. Thus, for so many days he is called a visitor (παρεπίδηµος) and does not pay tax, but if he passes the fixed time, he becomes a metic thenceforth and liable to taxation (µέτοικος ἤδη γίνεται καὶ ὑποτελής).”6 The last clause 1 P. Gauthier, Symbola: Les étrangers et la justice dans les cités grecques (Nancy 1972) 122 (month); D. Whitehead, Ideology of the Athenian Metic (Cambridge 1977) 9, 76 (month), 75-77 (metoikion), 89-92 (prostates). 2 Whitehead, Ideology of the Athenian Metic 16-17. 3 D. Kamen, Status in Classical Athens (Princeton 2013) 43: “distinguished from each other not only legally but also (more significantly) socially.” 4 Harp. s.v. µετοίκιον: µέτοικος µέν ἐστιν ὁ ἐξ ἑτέρας πόλεως µετοικῶν ἐν ἑτέρᾳ καὶ µὴ πρὸς ὀλίγον ὡς ξένος ἐπιδηµῶν, ἀλλὰ τὴν οἴκησιν αὐτόθι καταστησάµενος. ἐδίδοντο δὲ ὑπ’ αὐτῶν καθ’ ἕκαστον ἔτος δραχµαὶ ιβʹ, ὅπερ ὠνόµαστο µετοίκιον. 5 A. Dimopoulou-Piliouni, “Apeleutheroi: Metics or Foreigners?” Dike 11 (2008) 27–50, 29-30, suggests, “Such a definition could evidently not apply to a freedman residing in the city of his former master. A fundamental difference between a metic and a manumitted slave appears to be that the first was the citizen of another city, who chose to leave his natal city and move and live permanently into another. A metic was a willingly expatriated foreigner, a free man making his living permanently abroad, one who had never lost his civic status or rights in his natal city. If a metic chose to return to his homeland, he would be there a citizen of full rights.” But such a literal test would have excluded political exiles, whose departure was unwilling, or war refugees, who may not have had a homeland to return to, or countless others who may not have come from a polis in the first place—say, Aetolians. 6 Ar. Byz. 38 [Nauck]: Μέτοικος δέ ἐστιν ὁπόταν τις ἀπὸ ξένης ἐλθὼν ἐνοικῇ τῇ πόλει, τέλος τελῶν εἰς ἀποτεταγµένας τινὰς χρείας τῆς πόλεως· ἕως µὲν οὖν ποσῶν ἡµερῶν παρεπίδηµος καλεῖται καὶ ἀτελής ἐστιν, ἐὰν δὲ ὑπερβῇ τὸν ὡρισµένον χρόνον, µέτοικος ἤδη γίνεται καὶ ὑποτελής· παραπλησίως δὲ τούτῳ καὶ ὁ ἰσοτελής. 1 is telegraphic, sensible enough but legally imprecise. As Pollux put it, “a metic is one who pays the metoikion,”7 and according to the Suda one’s prostates assisted.8 Payment was a physical and bureaucratic act performed in the presence of others and written down.9 One could not “become” a metic automatically. We find the same imprecision elsewhere. Harpokration defines aprostasiou as “a type of action against metics who do not register / have a prostates.”10 If one paid the metoikion through a prostates then anyone lacking such could not have paid the metoikion; such a person was not legally a metic. Also Pollux.11 Similarly, the Suda notes that the poletai sold off the assets of metics who had no prostatai.12 The author of the Ath.Pol. states that the polemarch heard cases of aprostasiou for metics,13 by which he can only have meant that the polemarch heard cases of aprostasiou for those who appeared to be metics but, in fact, may or may not have taken the necessary steps to become so: a prosecutor might establish that a resident non-citizen was entirely 7 Pollux 3.55: µέτοικος ὁ τὸ µετοίκιον συντελῶν. 8 Suda s.v. Ἀποστασίου: Ἀπροστασίου δέ· τῶν µετοίκων ἕκαστος προστάτην ἔχουσι κατὰ νόµον ἕνα τῶν ἀστῶν, καὶ δι’ αὐτοῦ τό τε µετοίκιον τίθεται κατὰ ἔτος καὶ τὰ ἄλλα διοικεῖται (Cf. aprostasiou: each of the metics has a prostates, one of the citizens by law, and through him he pays the metoikion each year and manages everything else). Also s.v. Νέµειν προστάτην: ἀντὶ τοῦ ἔχειν προστάτην· τῶν γὰρ µετοίκων ἕκαστος µετὰ προστάτου τῶν ἀστῶν τινος τὰ πράγµατα αὑτοῦ συνῴκει καὶ τὸ µετοίκιον κατετίθει. καὶ τὸ ἔχειν προστάτην καλεῖται νέµειν προστάτην (for “to have a prostates;” for, each of the metics, with a prostates, who is one of the astoi, used to jointly administer his own affairs and pay the metoikion. And to have a prostates is called “nemein prostaten”). Here, συνῴκει must be an error for συνῳκονόµει; Whitehead translates, “each of the metics [sc. in classical Athens] manages his own affairs in conjunction with a sponsor who is one of the citizens” (Suda Online, Adler nu,166: http://www.stoa.org/sol). A handful of passages in the orators (Lys. 31.9, Dem. 29.3, Dem. 57.55, texts quoted below) refer to a metic depositing (κατα/τίθηµι) metoikion, which may suggest payment in person (Whitehead, Ideology of the Athenian Metic 76), but none indicates active engagement by the prostates. 9 At Dem. 25.57 (quoted below) an alleged violator was hauled to the poleterion and found there to have paid the metoikion; this must have involved consultation of records kept by the tax collector(s) or the poletai themselves. 10 Harp. s.v. Ἀπροστασίου: εἶδος δίκης κατὰ τῶν προστάτην µὴ νεµόντων µετοίκων· ᾑρεῖτο γὰρ ἕκαστος ἑαυτῷ τῶν πολιτῶν τινὰ προστησόµενον περὶ πάντων τῶν ἰδίων καὶ τῶν κοινῶν. Ὑπερείδης ἐν τῷ κατ’ Ἀρισταγόρας ἀπροστασίου βʹ (… For each used to choose for himself one of the citizens to be his prostates concerning all his own and common affairs. [sc. An example is] Hypereides in his second speech against Aristagora for aprostasiou). 11 Pollux Onom. 8.35: ἀποστασίου δὲ δίκη κατὰ τῶν ἀφισταµένων ἀπελευθέρων, ἀπροστασίου δὲ κατὰ τῶν οὐ νεµόντων προστάτην µετοίκων (apostasiou is an action against freedmen who depart, and aprostasiou [sc. is an action] against metics who do not register / have a prostates). 12 Suda s.v. πωλητής: …ὑπέκειντο δὲ τοῖς Πωληταῖς καὶ ὅσοι τὸ διαγραφὲν ἀργύριον ἐν πολέµῳ µὴ εἰσέφερον, ἔτι καὶ οἱ ξενίας ἁλόντες καὶ ὁ µέτοικος καὶ προστάτην οὐκ ἔχων καὶ ὁ ἀποστασίου γραφείς· τούτων γὰρ τὰς οὐσίας πωλοῦντες παρεκατέβαλον εἰς τὸ δηµόσιον (also falling under the poletai were those who did not contribute the levied sum in wartime, and also those convicted of xenia, and the metic who did not have a prostates, and the one who was convicted of apostasiou). This last is an error for aprostasiou; see Suda Online, Adler pi,2159: http://www.stoa.org/sol, where Whitehead translates “metics who had failed to take a prostates and been convicted on that charge” and links (n3) to aprostasiou (Adler alpha,3703). 13 Ath.Pol. 58.3 αὐτὸς δ’ εἰσάγει δίκας τάς τε τοῦ ἀπο[σ]τασίου καὶ ἀπροστασ[ί]ου καὶ κλήρων καὶ ἐπικλήρων τοῖς µετοίκοις. 2 delinquent and had never been a legal metic in the first place.14 Elsewhere, the Suda draws the legal distinction carefully (s.v. aprostasiou): “whenever someone, though seeming to be a metic (δοκῶν εἶναι µέτοικος), does not have a prostates or does not pay the metoikion or claims to be a citizen though he has been wrongly enrolled in the politeia, he who wishes brings suit against him, which is called ‘aprostasiou.’”15 An alien whose stay passed the prescribed limit, but who lacked a prostates and had not paid the metoikion, was not a metic. He was liable to become one and may well have seemed to be so. But to be and to seem were different legal facts. If conversion to metic status was not automatic, becoming liable was. “[I]n the fourth century at least, foreigners arriving in Athens—whether intending to ‘immigrate’ or not—encountered an essentially pragmatic machinery: intentions apart, if they stayed for longer than a statutory (and fairly short) period the polis required them to become metics.”16 So shows the rider to the decree that honored Straton of Sidon, which added that Sidonians who were visiting Athens for the purpose of trade could not be made to pay metoikion, serve as choregos, or contribute eisphora, “provided that they reside in Sidon and are active citizens” there.17 Absent this protection, if these Sidonians stayed in Athens beyond the fixed time limit they would have had to become metics; presence beyond the time limit was otherwise sufficient to trigger liability, and claims of proper residence elsewhere would not have altered that fact. By freeing these Sidonians from having to pay the metoikion18 the decree accorded them “an artificially prolonged ‘life’ as xenoi, as parepidemountes free of financial obligation.”19 One who pays the metoikion is a metic; one who does not is not.
Recommended publications
  • Democracy in Ancient Athens Was Different from What We Have in Canada Today
    54_ALB6SS_Ch3_F2 2/13/08 2:25 PM Page 54 CHAPTER Democracy in 3 Ancient Athens Take a long step 2500 years back in time. Imagine you are a boy living in the ancient city of Athens, Greece. Your slave, words matter! Cleandros [KLEE-an-thros], is walking you to school. Your father Ancient refers to something and a group of his friends hurry past talking loudly. They are on from a time more than their way to the Assembly. The Assembly is an important part of 2500 years ago. democratic government in Athens. All Athenian men who are citizens can take part in the Assembly. They debate issues of concern and vote on laws. As the son of a citizen, you look forward to being old enough to participate in the Assembly. The Birthplace of Democracy The ancient Greeks influenced how people today think about citizenship and rights. In Athens, a form of government developed in which the people participated. The democracy we enjoy in Canada had its roots in ancient Athens. ■ How did men who were citizens participate in the democratic government in Athens? ■ Did Athens have representative government? Explain. 54 54_ALB6SS_Ch3_F2 2/13/08 2:25 PM Page 55 “Watch Out for the Rope!” Cleandros takes you through the agora, a large, open area in the middle of the city. It is filled with market stalls and men shopping and talking. You notice a slave carrying a rope covered with red paint. He ? Inquiring Minds walks through the agora swinging the rope and marking the men’s clothing with paint.
    [Show full text]
  • How Ancient Greece and Rome Provide Insight for Citizenship and Immigration in the 21St Century
    Xavier University Exhibit Honors Bachelor of Arts Undergraduate 2019-4 Comparing Ancient to Modern: How Ancient Greece and Rome Provide Insight for Citizenship and Immigration in the 21st Century Viktoria Schumacher Follow this and additional works at: https://www.exhibit.xavier.edu/hab Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, Ancient Philosophy Commons, Classical Archaeology and Art History Commons, Classical Literature and Philology Commons, and the Other Classics Commons Comparing Ancient to Modern: How Ancient Greece and Rome Provide Insight for Citizenship and Immigration in the 21st Century Viktoria Schumacher CPHAB Senior Thesis Xavier University 2019 Director: Thomas Strunk Readers: Jay Arns and Tim Severyn 1 Introduction Migration plays an extremely vital role in the advancement of human societies. Despite our world’s staggering history with immigration, the conversation about how to manage current issues has fallen flat. Patterns of immigration have demonstrated that the number of migrants, especially refugees, has peaked in the 21st century, and numbers are still raising steadily.1 The increase is caused by an abundance of factors, including major events such as the Syrian refugee crisis, harmful or unfavorable political climates, and ongoing gang violence in Mexico and Central America. These issues have gone largely unsolved, causing immense suffering resulting in millions of people to migrate out of their home countries. Movement away from home due to tumultuous times is not a new concept. In fact, migration history demonstrates that major movement of people is a characteristic of our world. I posit that looking at migration in our past as well as examining its effects on different societies will offer a perspective that has otherwise been ignored.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Consequences of the Plague of Athens
    Graeco-Latina Brunensia 22 / 2017 / 1 DOI: 10.5817/GLB2017-1-12 Political Consequences of the Plague of Athens Javier Martínez Abstract During the Plague of Athens, foreign refugees as well as inhabitants of nearby rural areas flood- ed the city, establishing the necessary conditions for the epidemic to spread rapidly to other parts of Greece. Athens, formerly Greece’s most open and accepting city-state with regards to resident aliens (‘metics’), experienced such disruption that metics would suffer permanent loss ČLÁNKY / ARTICLES of the legal right to become Athenian citizens – while perhaps also losing the desire to seek citizenship – and Athens itself would suffer a permanent loss of power and prestige. Athenian attitudes toward metics did change noticeably in the fourth and fifth centuries, but not for the better. Keywords Plague of Athens; resident aliens in Athens; metics; women; xenophobia 135 Javier Martínez Political Consequences of the Plague of Athens Introduction The Plague of Athens (430–426 BCE) remains one of the most famous epidemics in history, even though only one eyewitness account, that of Athenian citizen Thucydides, survives (Salway & Dell 1955). The epidemic erupted in Attica in the second year of the Peloponnesian War (431–404 BCE) during a siege of Athens (then the leader of the Deli- an League) by its rival city-state, Sparta, and Sparta’s allies in the Peloponnesian League. When the disease first began to spread, Athens was crowded with foreign refugees and local inhabitants from the countryside. This increase in population overstretched the city’s infrastructure and resources, and set up the conditions for an epidemic that spread easily to other parts of Greece.
    [Show full text]
  • Stasis, Political Change and Political Subversion in Syracuse, 415-305 B.C
    'STASIS', POLITICAL CHANGE Al']]) POLITICAL SUBVERSION IN SYRACUSE, 415-305 B.C. by DAVID JOHN BETTS, B.A.(Hons.) Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA HOBART October 1980 To the best of my knowledge and belief, this thesis contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any university, and contains no copy or paraphrase of material previously published or written by another person, except when due reference is made in the text of the thesis. Signed : (iii) CONTENTS Abstract iv Principal Ancient Texts vi Abbreviations, Textual Note vii INTRODUCTION : Scope and Intention of Thesis 1 CHAPTER 1 : Revolutionary Change and the Preservation of Constitutions CHAPTER 2 : The Nature and Method of Revolutionary Change and Political Subversion in Syracuse, 415-305 B.C. 45 CHAPTER 3 : Political Problems and the Role of the Leader in Syracuse, 415-305 B.C. 103 CHAPTER 4 : The Effect of Socio—Economic Conditions 151 CHAPTER 5 : Conclusion 180 APPENDIX : A Note on the Sources for Sicilian History 191 Footnotes 202 Tables 260 Maps 264 Bibliography 266 Addendum 271 (iv) ABSTRACT The thesis examines the phenomena of opr71-4,/5 , political change and political subversion in Syracuse from 415 to 305 B.C. The Introductory Chapter gives a general outline of the problems in this area, together with some discussion of the critical background. As the problems involved with the ancient sources for the period under discussion lie outside the mainstream of the thesis, these have been dealt with in the form of an appendix.
    [Show full text]
  • The Citizenship Debates, Lysias, and the Metics in Athens After The
    ISSN: 2519-1268 Issue 7 (Autumn 2018), pp. 23-64 DOI: 10.6667/interface.7.2018.74 The Citizenship Debates, Lysias, and the Metics in Athens after the Restoration of Democracy vassilis vagios National Taiwan University Abstract After the restoration of democracy in Athens in 403 B.C. the question of who should be in- cluded in the citizen-body was fervently contested. Two of the speeches composed by Lysias for delivery at this period have been interpreted by Bakewell (1999) as constituting a covert proposal of adding an alternative to citizenship by birth: legal naturalization. This paper argues that Bakewell’s interpretation misunderstands the argument of the speech Against Philon which is concerned only with eligibility to serve in the Council, not with citizenship. Furthermore, the paper questions the validity of what Bakewell (1999) considers as Athenian stereotypes of metics (resident aliens), and concludes that these are stereotypes held by modern scholars, generated by misunderstandings of the actual composition of the metic community, rather than ancient Athenian views. The paper is addressed not only to Classicists, but also to scholars of other disciplines who might be interested in the opinions held by host communities towards diasporic communities among them. Keywords: Democracy, Citizenship, Metics, Lysias, Athens © Vassilis Vagios This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. http://interface.ntu.edu.tw/ 23 The Citizenship Debates, Lysias, and the Metics in Athens after the Restoration of Democracy 403 B.C. was a year of great upheaval in Athens. The conclusion of the civil war between the supporters of the oligarchic regime imposed by the Spartans at the end of the Peloponnesian war and the supporters of democracy presented the restored democracy with considerable chal- lenges.
    [Show full text]
  • Becoming Macedonian: Name Mapping and Ethnic Identity. the Case of Hephaistion*
    Karanos 3, 2020 11-37 Becoming Macedonian: Name Mapping and Ethnic Identity. The Case of Hephaistion* by Jeanne Reames University of Nebraska at Omaha [email protected] With the Digital Assistance of Jason Heppler and Cory Starman ABSTRACT An epigraphical survey (with digital mapping component) of Greece and Magna Graecia reveals a pattern as to where Hephais-based names appear, up through the second century BCE. Spelled with an /eta/, these names are almost exclusively Attic-Ionian, while Haphēs-based names, spelled with an alpha, are Doric-Aeolian, and much fewer in number. There is virtually no overlap, except at the Panhellenic site of Delphi, and in a few colonies around the Black Sea. Furthermore, cult for the god Hephaistos –long recognized as a non-Greek borrowing– was popular primarily in Attic-Ionian and “Pelasgian” regions, precisely the same areas where we find Hephais-root names. The only area where Haphēs-based names appear in any quantity, Boeotia, also had an important cult related to the god. Otherwise, Hephaistos was not a terribly important deity in Doric-Aeolian populations. This epigraphic (and religious) record calls into question the assumed Macedonian ethnicity of the king’s best friend and alter-ego, Hephaistion. According to Tataki, Macedonian naming patterns followed distinctively non-Attic patterns, and cult for the god Hephaistos is absent in Macedonia (outside Samothrace). A recently published 4th century curse tablet from Pydna could, however, provide a clue as to why a Macedonian Companion had such a uniquely Attic-Ionian name. If Hephaistion’s ancestry was not, in fact, ethnically Macedonian, this may offer us an interesting insight into fluidity of Macedonian identity under the monarchy, and thereby, to ancient conceptualizations of ethnicity more broadly.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Seven
    2010066. Sluiter/Rosen 07_Ober. 2nd proofs. 1-7-2010:16.54, page 155. chapter seven THE INSTRUMENTAL VALUE OF OTHERS AND INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE: AN ATHENIAN CASE STUDY Josiah Ober . Instrumental vs. inherent value Among the central problems addressed by contemporary moral philos- ophy is the ethical question of how others ought to be valued.1 The pri- mary issue for ethicists is not whether we should value others, but our reasons for valuing them. The categorical imperative of Kantian deon- tological (rights- and duties-centered) ethics insists that we treat others as inherently valuable ends-in-themselves, rather than as instruments or means to our own valued ends. Utilitarian or consequentialist (outcome- centered) ethics, on the other hand, allows considerable space for instru- mentalizing others. The goal of the consequentialist is maximizing the quantity of some good, measured by aggregating utility satisfaction or preferences, across a given population (e.g. the residents of a state, all humanity, or even all sentient beings). Ancient Greek systems of ethics, with their focus on character and the virtues, cannot be reduced to a choice between deontology and consequentialism. Yet the contemporary ethical dichotomy nonetheless provides a useful device for evaluating changes in ancient institutions.2 Since antiquity, political philosophy has been closely aligned with ethics: questions of justice, obedience, and legitimate authority are not easily severed from the ethical question of why and how to value 1 Sections – of this chapter are adapted from Ober , chapter . 2 Deontology and consequentialism: Kagan . For the record my own moral commitments are neither primarily deontological nor primarily consequentialist but rather those of a liberal-leaning inclusivist Aristotelian; see Ober .
    [Show full text]
  • Age-Class Societies in Ancient Greece?*
    AGE-CLASS SOCIETIES IN ANCIENT GREECE?* Abstract: This article assesses the validity of claims that Greek city states were ‘age-class societies’, a type of social ordering found in acephalous societies, in which males grouped into age sets attain different degrees of power and status as they progress collectively though a system of age grades. After a survey of the anthropological terminology, drawn mostly from studies of age-class societies in northeastern Africa, three Greek case studies are presented: Athens, Sparta, and Crete. Examination of literary and epigraphical evidence reveals that while Athens manifested an abundance of age designa- tions they did not cohere into the official, universally applicable age scale necessary in an age-class society. The ephebate proves to be neither compulsory nor all-inclusive, qualities typical of age-class systems. In contrast, the Spartan citizen training system was compul- sory for all young Spartiates, but no evidence exists for the further collective movement of Spartan males through an official set of graded age designations, despite a recent detailed argument in favor of Sparta being organized along generation-set lines. The mixture of different ages was moreover integral to the functioning of important Spartan institutions such as the army and common messes. Crete offers the only evidence for universally-applied official age designa- tions, nonetheless without any indications that citizens belonged to age sets or age-grade scales were systematically arranged. This nega- tive finding leads to the conclusion that no single theory can explain how ancient Greek societies were organized and that more profitable insights may be gained from comparisons with evidence from places such as early modern Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin of Ancient Macedonian Studies 2020
    Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Departament de Ciències de l’Antiguitat i l’Edat Mitjana Karanos BULLETIN OF ANCIENT MACEDONIAN STUDIES http://revistes.uab.cat/karanos 03 ), online ( 3521 - 2604 ISSN e 2020 (paper), 6199 - 2604 , ISSN 20 20 , 3 Vol. Karanos Bulletin of Ancient Macedonian Studies Vol. 3 (2020) President of Honor Secretary F. J. Gómez Espelosín, Marc Mendoza Sanahuja (Universitat Autònoma (Universidad de Alcalá) de Barcelona) Director Edition Borja Antela-Bernárdez, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona) Departament de Ciències de l’Antiguitat i l’Edat Mitjana Editorial Board 08193 Bellaterra (Barcelona). Spain Borja Antela-Bernárdez Tel.: 93 581 47 87. Antonio Ignacio Molina Marín Fax: 93 581 31 14 (Universidad de Alcalá) [email protected] Mario Agudo Villanueva http://revistes.uab.cat/karanos (Universidad Complutense de Madrid) Layout: Borja Antela-Bernárdez Advisory Board F. Landucci (Università Cattolica del Printing Sacro Cuore) Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona E. Carney (Clemson University) Servei de Publicacions D. Mirón (Universidad de Granada) 08193 Bellaterra (Barcelona). Spain C. Rosillo (Universidad Pablo de Olavide) [email protected] F. Pownall (University of Alberta) http://publicacions.uab.cat/ W. L. Adams (University of Utah) N. Akamatis (International Hellenic University) ISSN: 2604-6199 (paper) V. Alonso-Troncoso (Universidad de A Coruña) eISSN 2604-3521 (online) A. Domínguez Monedero (Universidad Dipòsit legal: B 26.673-2018 Autónoma de Madrid) F. J. Gómez Espelosín (Universidad de Alcalá) Printed in Spain W. S. Greenwalt (Santa Clara University) Printed in Ecologic paper M. Hatzopoulos (National Hellenic Research Foundation) S. Müller (Philipps-Universität Marburg) M. Jan Olbrycht (University of Rzeszów) O.
    [Show full text]
  • Women in the Athenian Agora Picture Book No
    WomenATHENIAN AGORA American School of Classical Studies at Athens The Agora Excavations are conducted by the American School of Classical Studies at Athens in collaboration with the Packard Humanities Institute. ISBN 0-87661-644-9 Women in the Athenian Agora Picture Book No. 26 © 2006 by The American School of Classical Studies at Athens Front cover: Woman painted on a wine mixing bowl, mid-5th century b.c. (P 29766) Title page: Woman holding a flower, drinking cup from the Crossroads Shrine, last quarter of the 5th century (P 29902) WomenATHENIAN AGORA Susan I. Rotroff and Robert D. Lamberton AMERICAN SCHOOL OF CLASSICAL STUDIES AT ATHENS 2006 $)09,/.'!4% (!34).'3342%%4 3!#2%$'!4% !'/2! 4(%3%)/.342%%4 340(),)0342%%4 "/5.$!2934/.% %.$/&6#%.4"# /&+%2!-%)+/3 34/!0/)+),% 2!),7!9 !,4!2 %2)$!./32)6%2 (%0(!)34/3342%%4 340(),)0 #2/332/!$33(2).% 2/9!,34/! (!$2)!.342%%4 !,4!2 /&4(% :%53 '/$3 3(/03 /& %3#(!2! 34/! #/524(/53% 05",)# 7%,, "!,,/4"/8 (%0(!)34%)/. '2%!4$2!). 2!#%42!#+ 0!.!4(%.!)#7!9 02)6!4%(/53%3 !.$3(/03 "/5,%54%2)/. -%42//. %6293!+%)/.342%%4 4(/,/3 "/5.$!2!934/.%3 /&!'/2! 3-!,, $2!). "5),$).'3 4(%%0/.9-/53 (%2/%3 342!4%'%)/. !)!+%)/. 05",)# 3/54(34/!) !#2/0/,)3 0)2!%53 7%,, '!4% 3/54(%!34 &/5.4!). -).4 (/53% (/53% 3(2).% 0/2/3 "5),$).' -%4%23 1. The Athenian Agora at the time Socrates and Ischomachos had their conversation. The Stoa of Zeus is at the upper left (1).
    [Show full text]
  • Metics and Identity in Democratic Athens
    METICS AND IDENTITY IN DEMOCRATIC ATHENS By MATTHEW JOHN KEARS A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Institute of Archaeology and Antiquity College of Arts and Law University of Birmingham March 2013 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT This thesis investigates the metics, or resident aliens, in democratic Athens and how they affected ideas of identity, with a particular focus on the fourth century BC. It looks at definitions of the metics and how the restrictions and obligations which marked their status operated; how these affected their lives and their image, in their own eyes and those of the Athenians; how the Athenians erected and maintained a boundary of status and identity between themselves and the metics, in theory and in practice; and how individuals who crossed this boundary could present themselves and be characterised, especially in the public context of the lawcourts. The argument is that the metics served as a contradiction of and challenge to Athenian ideas about who they were and what made them different from others.
    [Show full text]
  • 448 Rebecca Futo Kennedy the Title of Rebecca Futo Kennedy's New Book, Immigrant Women in Athens, Gender, Ethnicity, and Citiz
    448 Book Reviews Rebecca Futo Kennedy Immigrant Women in Athens: Gender, Ethnicity, and Citizenship in the Classical City (New York; London: Routledge, 2014), xiii + 177 pp. $125.00. ISBN 9780415737869 (hbk). The title of Rebecca Futo Kennedy’s new book, Immigrant Women in Athens, Gender, Ethnicity, and Citizenship in the Classical City, is a misnomer, as she readily admits. It might more aptly have been called, ‘The Ideology of Metic Women in Athens’. Kennedy is interested in the depiction and lives of historical metic women, (a diverse group that includes free immigrants, those descended from immigrants, and freed slaves), as well as in dramatic representations of non-Athenian female figures who become metics or who, she argues, are lik- ened to them. More precisely, she investigates how ‘developments in citizen ideology and socio-political and economic realities of the city intersected and impacted metic women’ (p. 7). The first chapter reviews the position of metic women in law before and after Pericles’ citizenship law was passed in 451/0 BCE. A surge in female immi- gration must have been the impetus behind the law, Kennedy reasons, because the law had the greatest impact on the fortunes of free foreign women in Athens. Kennedy believes that the law had a negative effect on metic women not because they were barred from marrying citizens per se but because the children produced in such unions were ineligible for citizenship. Although Kennedy is likely correct that unions between citizen men and metic women continued to occur, it is difficult to know how such unions were characterized, especially since the citizenship law uses the language of legitimacy (a status that depends on marriage) to designate potential citizens.
    [Show full text]