Metics and Athenian Citizenship in the Aftermath of the Thirty Bakewell, Geoff Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Spring 1999; 40, 1; Proquest Pg

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Metics and Athenian Citizenship in the Aftermath of the Thirty Bakewell, Geoff Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Spring 1999; 40, 1; Proquest Pg Lysias 12 and Lysias 31: Metics and Athenian citizenship in the aftermath of the thirty Bakewell, Geoff Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Spring 1999; 40, 1; ProQuest pg. 5 Lysias 12 and Lysias 31: Metics and Athenian Citizenship in the Aftermath of the Thirty Geoff Bakewell HE SPEECHES LYSIAS 12 Ken·a. 'Epa'tocrSevou<; and Lysias 31 Ka'ta. <l>iA,(J)vo<; date to roughly the same time period, T403--401 B.C.! The former was likely delivered at the ac­ countability proceeding (EuSuva) of Eratosthenes, one of the Thirty who sought to remain in Athens under the terms of the reconciliation agreement of 403.2 The latter formed part of the competency hearing (ooK1Ilacria) for Philon, a man selected by lot to serve on the reconstituted boule. 3 Both speeches fault the defendants for their actions during the tyranny.4 Moreover, they lK. J. Dover, Lysias and the Corpus Lysiacum (Berkeley 1968), holds that most Lysian speeches apart from 12 were products of consultation and collaboration between logographer and client. S. Usher, "Lysias and His Clients," GRBS 17 (1976) 31-40, defends the traditional view of independent composition by Ly:sias. M. Weissenberger, Die Dokimasiereden des Lysias (orr. 16, 25, 26, 31) (Beitr.z.klass.Phil. 182 [Frankfurt 1987]) 149-152, accepts Lysias as the author of 31. S. Usher and M. Najock, "A Statistical Study of Authorship in the Corpus Lysiacum," Computers and the Humanities 16 (1982) 85-105, at 104, are less certain, assigning it "a marginal position" in this regard. The rhetorical similarity between speeches 12 and 31 addressed below constitutes another argument for the authenticity of the latter. 2T. Murphy, "The Vilification of Eratosthenes and Theramenes in Lysias 12," AlP 110 (1989) 40-49, at 40, places the speech in the "twenty-day period following 12 Boedromion, 403." 3Weissenberger (supra n.1) 401 argues for a date shortly before 401/0 B.C. "spatestens zur Dokimasie des Friihjahres 401." 4 Under the terms of the reconciliation agreement, Athenians were not to pursue grievances against one another which dated to the rule of the Thirty. On orators' frequent disregard of this principle of Ill, I1VT1<HKUK£'iv (Ath.Pol. 39.6), see P. J. Rhodes, A Commentary on the Aristotelian Athenaion Politeia 2 (Oxford 1993) 472. Greek, Roman, and ~yzantine Studies 40 (1999) 5-22 ©2000 GRBS 5 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 6 LYSIAS 12 AND LYSIAS 31 employ a similar rhetorical gambit: they use metics as a point of reference in evaluating the deeds of the accused, who were citizens. In particular, the speeches note that some metics acted better than did some citizens.s One implication of this argument is that from the point of view of the polis, good 1l£'t01KOl are preferable to bad not-1ml. Lysias takes this good metic/bad citizen comparison one step further. In casting Eratosthenes and Philon as individuals devoted to money and inclined to place their own good above that of the polis, he assimilates them to the worst of metic stereotypes. These speeches of Lysias pro­ vide valuable evidence for Athenian attitudes towards citizen­ ship during the restoration of the democracy. In particular, they suggest that at least some Athenian citizens saw shortcomings in distinctions based solely on heredity. The fact that the city subsequently reinstated Perikles' citizenship law of 451/0 should not obscure the importance of Lysias' claim that birth alone is insufficient for citizenship. Indeed, the orator's explicit formulation that people must also want to be citizens, and the apparent willingness of some of his citizen listeners to countenance it, deserves just as much notice as Athens' famed political moderation after the overthrow of the Thirty. 1. Bad citizens and good metics One prominent claim of both Lysias 12 and Lysias 31 is that in the turbulent times of the rule of the Thirty, civic status was an unreliable predictor of men's behavior. He argues that under the circumstances, some metics proved to be better Athenians than did some citizens. In Lysias 12, the orator says that his father Kephalos was persuaded to immigrate to Athens by SLysias' speech Opo<; 'Imto8£pcH\v employs the same gambit (fr.1.135-206 Gernet-Bizos), but is not treated in this article because its date mar be substan­ tially later (e.g., after 394). If T. Loening, "The Autobiograyhica Speeches of Lyslas and the Biographical Tradition," Hermes 109 (198 ) 287-289, is cor­ rect that it dates to 403 or 402, this further strengthens the arguments advanced here. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. GEOFF BAKEWELL 7 Perikles, and that his family lived there quietly for many years. They were supporters of the democracy and stayed out of the law courts, neither harming anyone nor being harmed. The ad­ vent of the Thirty changed all that. The oligarchs executed his brother Polemarchos and would have done the same to Lysias had he not escaped. He fled to Megara, and his family's prop­ erty was confiscated. He summarizes this period in his family history thus (12.20): aU' OUtffie; de; fH.taC; oux to. XPtlJ.Lata E~llJ.Laptavov, WCJ1tEP (Xv £tEPOt J.LqaAffiv aOtKllJ.Latffiv opyTjv EXOVtEC;, ou tOUtffiV a~ioue; yE ovtae; til ltOAEt, aAAa ltacrae; (J.LEV) tae; XOPllyiae; XOPTj­ ytlaavtae;, ltOAAaC; 0' d(j(popae; £laEvqKoVtae;, KoaJ.Liouc; 0' "wac; autoue; ltapExovtae; Ka!. to ltpoatattoJ.LEvOV ltowuvtac;, EXOpOV 0' ouOEva KEKtllJ.LEVOUC;, ltOAAOUe; 0' 'AOTjvaiffiv £K trov ltOAEJ.LiffiV AUaaJ.LEVouc;· tOWUtffiV iJ~iffiaav OUX OJ.LOiffiC; J.LEtotKOUVtae; WaltEp auto!' EltOAltEUovtO. But they were wronging us on account of money, in the way that others might who are angry at great injustices. We did not deserve these things with respect to the city, but had fulfilled all our choregic duties, and had paid many special taxes; we were orderly and did what was assigned us, made no enemies, and ransomed many Athenians from our foes. They deemed us worthy of such treatment, and as citizens conducting the govern­ ment behaved far differently than we who were metics.6 Throughout the passage Lysias emphasizes the differences be­ tween his family and the Thirty. He and his relatives acted like the best sort of citizens; their civic virtue shone all the more brightly when viewed against the actions of Eratosthenes and his cohorts. The final phrase sums up these differences in con­ duct: the opposition between ll£t01KOUY'tW; and E7tOAt't£UOY'to is pronounced, and is strengthened by the OUX Ollotm<; ... wcr7t£p construction. The conduct of Lysias and his family, who were 1l£'t01KOt, was unlike, i.e., superior to, that of the Thirty, who were 7tOAt'tat governing Athens. 6The text is that of Hude. All translations are my own. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 8 LYSIAS 12 AND LYSIAS 31 Lysias 31 adopts the same tactic, attacking Philon by com­ paring his conduct with that of the metics who fought alongside Thrasyboulos. While they risked life and limb to help the demos, Philon took no side in the struggle, fleeing to Oropos. At one point in the trial, the unnamed accuser urges the jurors to punish Philon on the following grounds (31.29): 'til; 0' oln~ av dlCO'tO)<; f7ttn!lTtcr£t£V U!ltV, d 'to\><; !l£'toilCou<; !lEV, on OU lCU'ta 'to 1tPOcr11lCOV euu'tot<; f~OTteTJcruv 'tip OTt!lCP, fn!lTt(w't£ a~iO)<; 'tT\<; 1tOA£o)<;, 't01hov OE, on 1tUpa 'to 1tPOcrT\lCOV euu'tf{> 1tPOU­ OO)lC£ 't~v 1tOAtV, !l~ lCoAacr£'t£, d !lTt y£ UAACP nv! !l£i~ovt, 'tn y£ 1tUpoucrn an!l itt; Who would not rightly blame you, if you honored in a fashion worthy of the city the metics because they assisted the people out of proportion to their obligation, but will not punish this man because he betrayed the city contrary to his obligation, if not with some greater penalty, then at least with the present dishonor? As in the passage from Lysias 12, antitheses drive home the point. The 'tOUC; !l€Wll(OUC; !lEV is balanced by the 'to\)'tov 8E: on the one hand the me tics, on the other this man Phil on (who as a prospective ~oUA€u'tilc; was a citizen). The me tics helped the people, the citizen betrayed the city; the metics acted out of proportion to their obligation, Philon acted contrary to his obli­ gation. Whitehead has categorized remarks of this sort as an a fortiori topos resting on a largely negative stereotype of metics at Athens: "if (mere) metics do or suffer something, then surely citizens ... "7 According to him, such comparisons focus atten­ tion primarily on citizen behavior; Lysias is urging his listeners to raise their expectations for citizens. Yet the comparisons here also have the effect of ennobling metic behavior. In Lysias 12.20, for instance, the lines leading up to the metic/ citizen compari- 7D. Whitehead, The Ideology of the Athenian Metic (Cambridge 1977: here­ after WHITEHEAD) 55. While he specifically includes Lys. 31.29 in this topos, he does not mention Lys. 12.20. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. GEOFF BAKEWELL 9 son stress that the orator and his family served as choregoi, paid taxes, were orderly,S made no private enemies, ransomed Athen­ ian prisoners. In a phrase, they did what was assigned to them by the city, 'to rtpoa'tu't'to~EVOV rtOlOUV'tUC;.9 Likewise, Lysias 31.29 reminds the audience that metics comprised a substantial portion of Thrasyboulos' support.lO In fighting for the city, these men went beyond the call of duty (ou KU'tU 'to rtpoallKov Euuw'iC;).
Recommended publications
  • Democracy in Ancient Athens Was Different from What We Have in Canada Today
    54_ALB6SS_Ch3_F2 2/13/08 2:25 PM Page 54 CHAPTER Democracy in 3 Ancient Athens Take a long step 2500 years back in time. Imagine you are a boy living in the ancient city of Athens, Greece. Your slave, words matter! Cleandros [KLEE-an-thros], is walking you to school. Your father Ancient refers to something and a group of his friends hurry past talking loudly. They are on from a time more than their way to the Assembly. The Assembly is an important part of 2500 years ago. democratic government in Athens. All Athenian men who are citizens can take part in the Assembly. They debate issues of concern and vote on laws. As the son of a citizen, you look forward to being old enough to participate in the Assembly. The Birthplace of Democracy The ancient Greeks influenced how people today think about citizenship and rights. In Athens, a form of government developed in which the people participated. The democracy we enjoy in Canada had its roots in ancient Athens. ■ How did men who were citizens participate in the democratic government in Athens? ■ Did Athens have representative government? Explain. 54 54_ALB6SS_Ch3_F2 2/13/08 2:25 PM Page 55 “Watch Out for the Rope!” Cleandros takes you through the agora, a large, open area in the middle of the city. It is filled with market stalls and men shopping and talking. You notice a slave carrying a rope covered with red paint. He ? Inquiring Minds walks through the agora swinging the rope and marking the men’s clothing with paint.
    [Show full text]
  • Citations in Classics and Ancient History
    Citations in Classics and Ancient History The most common style in use in the field of Classical Studies is the author-date style, also known as Chicago 2, but MLA is also quite common and perfectly acceptable. Quick guides for each of MLA and Chicago 2 are readily available as PDF downloads. The Chicago Manual of Style Online offers a guide on their web-page: http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide.html The Modern Language Association (MLA) does not, but many educational institutions post an MLA guide for free access. While a specific citation style should be followed carefully, none take into account the specific practices of Classical Studies. They are all (Chicago, MLA and others) perfectly suitable for citing most resources, but should not be followed for citing ancient Greek and Latin primary source material, including primary sources in translation. Citing Primary Sources: Every ancient text has its own unique system for locating content by numbers. For example, Homer's Iliad is divided into 24 Books (what we might now call chapters) and the lines of each Book are numbered from line 1. Herodotus' Histories is divided into nine Books and each of these Books is divided into Chapters and each chapter into line numbers. The purpose of such a system is that the Iliad, or any primary source, can be cited in any language and from any publication and always refer to the same passage. That is why we do not cite Herodotus page 66. Page 66 in what publication, in what edition? Very early in your textbook, Apodexis Historia, a passage from Herodotus is reproduced.
    [Show full text]
  • The Family Connection of Alcibiades and Axiochus , Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies, 27:2 (1986:Summer) P.173
    STANLEY, PHILLIP V., The Family Connection of Alcibiades and Axiochus , Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies, 27:2 (1986:Summer) p.173 The Family Connection of Alcibiades and Axiochus Phillip V. Stanley LTHOUGH THE ANCESTRY of the Athenian general Alcibiades A III remains obscure for the sixth century, his genealogy is as­ sumed to be secure for the fifth. The descent of the family from Alcibiades I to Alcibiades IV has been reconstructed by Vander­ pool in the following way:l Alcibiades J2 I Cleinias I I Alcibiades II I I Axiochus Cleinias II I I I I Cleinias III Alcibiades III Cleinias IV I Alcibiades IV I E. Vanderpool, "The Ostracism of the Elder Alcibiades," Hesperia 21 (I952) 1-8, esp. 6. Cr. M. B. Wallace, "Early Greek Proxenoi," Phoenix 24 (I 970) 196f; 1. K. DAVIES, Athenian Propertied Families (Oxford 1971 [hereafter APF)) 10-12. According to Isoc. 16.25f (delivered by Alcibiades IV, son of the general), Alcibiades I, the ally of Cleisthenes when he expelled Hippias from Athens, was the great-grandfather (1TpO- 1Ta1T1To~) of Alcibiades III. The general difficulty stems from the apparent need to reduce the number of generations separating Alcibiades I from Alcibiades III, believed to be five: if the number is not reduced, Alcibiades I would actually be the great-great­ grandfather of the general. 2 Roman numerals are those assigned in PA and APF. These numerals will continue to be used even when homonyms are added to the family's genealogy. In order to avoid the confusion that might result if a major overhaul of the numerical system for this family were attempted, and to preserve the numerical descent established for the branch of the family to which Alcibiades III belongs, the newly identified individual will be assigned the next available Roman numeral, even though he may be earlier than an individual with the same name whose number is lower.
    [Show full text]
  • “FRBR-Inspired” Catalog 2.1? (Fall 2012) Alison Babeu
    A Continuing Plan for the “FRBR-Inspired” Catalog 2.1? (Fall 2012) Alison Babeu Introduction....................................................................................................................................1 So What Exactly is in the FRBR-Inspired Catalog Collection Anyway?..................................1 What’s Contained in the Catalog Data (MODS records) ..........................................................2 What’s Found in the Enhanced Authority Records (MADS RECORDS)................................3 The Catalog’s Initial Goals and Changing Goals .......................................................................3 Current Status of Cataloging Work.............................................................................................4 Some Desired Enhancements to the MODS and MADS records..............................................5 Cataloging Priorities/Desires........................................................................................................6 Some Tasks To Automate/Partial Automation?...........................................................................7 Current Issues with the FRBR Catalog eXtensible Catalog implementation .........................7 Current Issues With FRBR Feeds in Dropbox............................................................................9 Introduction Work that began in 20051 to create an experimental “FRBRized” catalog for the Perseus Digital Library’s (PDL) online classics collection has continued to the present day in the form of work on
    [Show full text]
  • Lysias and the Date of Plato's Phaedrus by Spiro
    LYSIAS AND THE DATE OF PLATO'S PHAEDRUS BY SPIRO PANAGIOTOU It is generally accepted nowadays that the Phaedyus is a relatively late dialogue. Stylometric studies 1) and internal evidence 2) make almost certain that it was composed after the Republic. As to possible dates, Howland suggests 372 B. C. as the upper and 368 as the lower terminus 3). Hackforth rejects Howland's argument but accepts its general conclusions. Although very hesitant to give us a precise date, he ventures the guess of "37o B.C. or there- abouts" 4). Professor De Vries would prefer to bring the date a little forward to 369-67. But he also suggests that a "date between 366 and 362 is not excluded" 5). In this paper I wish to recommend 365 ?4 B.C. as the teyminus a quo for the composition of the Phaedyus. My discussion will center around the possible date for Lysias' death. In Section I I shall present a number of arguments which, taken together, make it virtually certain that Lysias is dead when Plato sits down to write the Phaedyus. I shall then offer in Section II some reasons for thinking that Lysias is alive up to the mid 36os. The consid- erations of Section II are admittedly problematic. However, I think it worth while to put them forth here. I Lysias must be dead when Plato sits down to compose the Phaedyus. There are at least three complementary reasons to 1) For results of stylometric studies cf. W. D. Ross, Plato's Theory of Ideas (Oxford 1953), 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Greek, and Latin GREE 315 Advanced Greek Literature a TRIMESTER 1 2011 Trimester Dates: 28 February-2 July 2011
    SCHOOL OF ART HISTORY, CLASSICS, AND RELIGIOUS STUDIES Classics, Greek, and Latin GREE 315 Advanced Greek Literature A TRIMESTER 1 2011 Trimester Dates: 28 February-2 July 2011 TRIMESTER DATES Teaching dates: 28 February to 3 June 2011 Mid-trimester break: 18 April to 1 May 2011 Study week: 6 June to 10 June 2011 Examination/Assessment period: 10 June to 2 July 2011 NB: Students who enrol in this course must be able to attend an examination at the University at any time during the formal examination period. WITHDRAWAL DATES Information on withdrawals and refunds may be found at http://www.viCtoria.aC.nz/home/admisenrol/payments/withdrawlsrefunds.aspx Menelaos retrieving Helen after the sack of Troy, under the influence of Erōs, Louvre G424. *1* GREE 315 Course Handout 2011 1. Course Organization Lecturer: Dr. David Rosenbloom. Office: OK 516; Phone: 463-5478; e-mail: [email protected]; office hour W 3:00-4:00 and by appointment. Lecture Time and Place: 9:00-9:50, M, W, F; OK 524. Dates: classes take place from 28 Feb. through 3 June. 2. Learning Objectives and Content Course Delivery In this course there are 36 classes. The main task of each class is to translate the Greek texts set for the course. AdditiOnal infOrmatiOn Any further announcements concerning the course will be posted on Blackboard. Learning Objectives and COntent GREE 315 is a reading course in ancient Greek prose and poetry. Building on GREE 216, its aim is to refine students’ understanding of the morphology, grammar, and syntax of ancient Greek and to introduce them to the study of Greek prose and poetry by a close reading of selected texts.
    [Show full text]
  • Obama's Discourse of "Hope": Making Rhetoric Work Politically
    Obama's discourse of "hope": Making rhetoric work politically Marcus Letts University of Bristol © Marcus Letts School of Sociology, Politics and International Studies University of Bristol Working Paper No. 04-09 Marcus Letts is a former undergraduate student in the Department of Politics, University of Bristol. This paper, originally a BSc dissertation, received the highest mark awarded to any BSc dissertation in Politics at the University of Bristol in 2008-2009. A revised version of this paper is currently being prepared for submission to the journal New Political Science. University of Bristol School of Sociology, Politics, and International Studies Title: Obama's discourse of "hope": Making rhetoric work politically (Morris, C. 2008) Question: What is articulated in Obama's discourse of "hope"? How did this rhetoric work politically? Marcus Letts Word Count: 9,899 2 Contents: Introduction: The US elections of 2008: A contextualisation The "strange death of Republican America": A grand theme of change................................ 5 A "rhetorical situation"?.......................................................................................................... 6 The birth of "Brand Obama": An exceptional campaign........................................................ 7 The nature of American "polyarchy"...................................................................................... 9 Literature Review: Two theories of discourse. Derrida's deconstruction and Laclau logics: A theory of discourse.......................................10
    [Show full text]
  • How Ancient Greece and Rome Provide Insight for Citizenship and Immigration in the 21St Century
    Xavier University Exhibit Honors Bachelor of Arts Undergraduate 2019-4 Comparing Ancient to Modern: How Ancient Greece and Rome Provide Insight for Citizenship and Immigration in the 21st Century Viktoria Schumacher Follow this and additional works at: https://www.exhibit.xavier.edu/hab Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, Ancient Philosophy Commons, Classical Archaeology and Art History Commons, Classical Literature and Philology Commons, and the Other Classics Commons Comparing Ancient to Modern: How Ancient Greece and Rome Provide Insight for Citizenship and Immigration in the 21st Century Viktoria Schumacher CPHAB Senior Thesis Xavier University 2019 Director: Thomas Strunk Readers: Jay Arns and Tim Severyn 1 Introduction Migration plays an extremely vital role in the advancement of human societies. Despite our world’s staggering history with immigration, the conversation about how to manage current issues has fallen flat. Patterns of immigration have demonstrated that the number of migrants, especially refugees, has peaked in the 21st century, and numbers are still raising steadily.1 The increase is caused by an abundance of factors, including major events such as the Syrian refugee crisis, harmful or unfavorable political climates, and ongoing gang violence in Mexico and Central America. These issues have gone largely unsolved, causing immense suffering resulting in millions of people to migrate out of their home countries. Movement away from home due to tumultuous times is not a new concept. In fact, migration history demonstrates that major movement of people is a characteristic of our world. I posit that looking at migration in our past as well as examining its effects on different societies will offer a perspective that has otherwise been ignored.
    [Show full text]
  • De Oratore I
    D E O R A T O R E BO O" 1 TRA N S L A TED IN TO E N G LIS H W ITH A N IN T R O DU C TIO N B Y P E N . MOOR M . , . A . A S S I S T A N T M A S T E R A T C L I F T O N C O L L E G E filamj um a nti 1 8 BU RY S TREET W C , . L O N D O N 1 8 9 2 IN TR O D U C TIO N H T E t hre e b o o k s De Ora tore seem to have been B . C 5 5 written by Cicero in the year . It was n t o n s o f a time when, owi g the i crea ing power the fo r Triumvirs, there was little room any political activity o n o f his the part Cicero . On recall from exile in the preceding year he had conceived som e hopes o f again taking a leading part in political life but owing partly to the lukewarmness o f some and the downright faith o f o f lessness others his old supporters, which made it impossible for him to resume his o l d place at the head o f s ro the optimates, and partly to the clo er union p du ced between Pom peia s and Caesar by the conference s at Luca, he thought it more advi able to withdraw f m s a s inva ri ro public life and con ole himself, was his 1 w able custom , with literary work .
    [Show full text]
  • Political Consequences of the Plague of Athens
    Graeco-Latina Brunensia 22 / 2017 / 1 DOI: 10.5817/GLB2017-1-12 Political Consequences of the Plague of Athens Javier Martínez Abstract During the Plague of Athens, foreign refugees as well as inhabitants of nearby rural areas flood- ed the city, establishing the necessary conditions for the epidemic to spread rapidly to other parts of Greece. Athens, formerly Greece’s most open and accepting city-state with regards to resident aliens (‘metics’), experienced such disruption that metics would suffer permanent loss ČLÁNKY / ARTICLES of the legal right to become Athenian citizens – while perhaps also losing the desire to seek citizenship – and Athens itself would suffer a permanent loss of power and prestige. Athenian attitudes toward metics did change noticeably in the fourth and fifth centuries, but not for the better. Keywords Plague of Athens; resident aliens in Athens; metics; women; xenophobia 135 Javier Martínez Political Consequences of the Plague of Athens Introduction The Plague of Athens (430–426 BCE) remains one of the most famous epidemics in history, even though only one eyewitness account, that of Athenian citizen Thucydides, survives (Salway & Dell 1955). The epidemic erupted in Attica in the second year of the Peloponnesian War (431–404 BCE) during a siege of Athens (then the leader of the Deli- an League) by its rival city-state, Sparta, and Sparta’s allies in the Peloponnesian League. When the disease first began to spread, Athens was crowded with foreign refugees and local inhabitants from the countryside. This increase in population overstretched the city’s infrastructure and resources, and set up the conditions for an epidemic that spread easily to other parts of Greece.
    [Show full text]
  • Cicero and Barack Obama: How to Unite the Republic Without Losing Your Head
    Georgetown University Law Center Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW 2020 Cicero and Barack Obama: How to Unite the Republic Without Losing Your Head Michael J. Cedrone Georgetown University Law Center, [email protected] This paper can be downloaded free of charge from: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/2266 https://ssrn.com/abstract=3607105 Nevada Law Journal, Vol. 20, Issue 3, 1177. This open-access article is brought to you by the Georgetown Law Library. Posted with permission of the author. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub Part of the Jurisprudence Commons, Law and Society Commons, and the Legal Writing and Research Commons 20 NEV. L.J. 1177 CICERO AND BARACK OBAMA: HOW TO UNITE THE REPUBLIC WITHOUT LOSING YOUR HEAD Michael J. Cedrone* TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 1178 I. AUTHOR AND AUDIENCE IN THE LIFE OF CICERO AND IN DE ORATORE .......................................................................................... 1182 A. Cicero: A Career Built on Oratory ........................................... 1182 B. De Oratore’s Purposes: Gazing on the Orator ......................... 1185 C. Setting the Scene for De Oratore: Location, Situation, Participants ............................................................................... 1186 D. Rhetoric, Philosophy, Action, Audience, and Power ................ 1187 II. CICERO AND BARACK OBAMA: RIGHTING THE SHIP OF STATE ........ 1191
    [Show full text]
  • John F. Kennedy at American University: the Rhetoric of the Possible, Epideictic Progression, and the Commencement of Peace
    The College of Wooster Open Works All Faculty Articles All Faculty Scholarship 2014 John F. Kennedy at American University: The Rhetoric of the Possible, Epideictic Progression, and the Commencement of Peace Denise M. Bostdorff The College of Wooster, [email protected] Shawna Ferris The College of Wooster Follow this and additional works at: https://openworks.wooster.edu/facpub Recommended Citation Bostdorff, Denise M. and Ferris, Shawna, "John F. Kennedy at American University: The Rhetoric of the Possible, Epideictic Progression, and the Commencement of Peace" (2014). Quarterly Journal of Speech, 100(4), 407-441. 10.1080/00335630.2014.989895. Retrieved from https://openworks.wooster.edu/ facpub/239 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the All Faculty Scholarship at Open Works, a service of The College of Wooster Libraries. This article is a(n) Accepted Manuscript and was originally published in Quarterly Journal of Speech (2014), available at https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2014.989895. For questions about OpenWorks, please contact [email protected]. John F. Kennedy at American University: The Rhetoric of the Possible, Epideictic Progression, and the Commencement of Peace Denise M. Bostdorff and Shawna H. Ferris Abstract: In his American University address, Kennedy employed epideictic progression, a pedagogical process drawing upon dissociation and epideictic norms to convince listeners, gradually, to embrace a new vision—in this case, a world in which a test ban treaty with the USSR was possible. To do so, Kennedy’s words: (1) united the audience behind the value of “genuine peace”; (2) humanized the Soviets as worthy partners in genuine peace; (3) established the reality of the Cold War and the credibility of US leadership; and (4) connected lessons on genuine peace to domestic civil rights.
    [Show full text]