DOCSLIB.ORG

El Dorado Task Force Papers Volume I

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
El Dorado Task Force Papers Volume I American Anthropological Association El Dorado Task Force Papers Volume I Submitted to the Executive Board As a Final Report May 18, 2002 PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN ANTHROPOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION EL DORADO TASK FORCE SUBMITTED AS A FINAL REPORT TO THE EXECUTIVE BOARD OF THE ASSOCIATION MAY 18, 2002 VOLUME I. TABLE OF CONTENTS A NOTE ON THE STRUCTURE OF THE REPORT PART I: BACKGROUND ON THE TASK FORCE AND THE INQUIRY (May 1, 2002) 1.1. STATEMENT OF THE CHARGE TO THE TASK FORCE 1.2. INTERPRETING THE CHARGE 1.3. STATEMENT OF MEMBERSHIP AND PROCEDURES PART II: INTRODUCTORY STATEMENTS (May 1, 2002) 2.1. Informed Consent and the work of James V. Neel 2.2. Some major allegations against Napoleon Chagnon 2.3. Deepening and moving beyond informed consent: Toward collaborative models of anthropological research. APPENDIX TO VOLUME I: 4.4.b Commentary by José Antonio Kelly CURRICULUM VITAE OF THE MEMBERS OF THE TASK FORCE Janet Chernela Fernando Coronil Ray Hames Jane H. Hill Trudy Turner Joe Watkins VOLUME II. TABLE OF CONTENTS A NOTE ON THE STRUCTURE OF THE REPORT PART III. BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS 3.1. THE ROLE OF THE ASSOCIATION (February 8, 2002)* 3.2. BACKGROUND ON THE YANOMAMI (Janet Chernela, (Ray Hames), Jane Hill) (February 8, 2002) 3.3. YANOMAMI UPDATES (Janet Chernela) 3.3 (1) Human Rights Issues Concerning the Yanomami in 2002. (February 8, 2002) Volume I, Page 2 3.3 (2) Translation Yanomami Bulletin #25 (April 3, 2002) PART IV: YANOMAMI STATEMENTS (Collected, transcribed, and translated by Janet Chernela) 4.1. Interview with Davi Kopenawa June 10, 2000 4.2. Interview with Davi Kopenawa June 7, 2001 4.3. Presentation by José Seripino Sep. 7, 2001 4.4.a Interview with Julio Wichato, José Antonio Kelly, and Guillermo Domingo Torres 4.5. Presentation by Toto Yanomami, April 2002 PART V: CASE STUDIES 5.1. The Measles Epidemic of 1968 (Trudy Turner and Jane Hill, February 14, 2002) 5.2. Informed consent and its contexts in the 1968 Neel Expedition (Trudy Turner, February 8, 2002) 5.3. Collection of Bodily Samples and Informed Consent (Janet Chernela, February 8, 2002) 5.4. Yanomami Names and Photographic Identification (Jane Hill (Ray Hames), February 8, 2002) 5.5. Involvement in Yanomami Political Affairs (Jane Hill (Ray Hames), February 8, 2002) 5.6. Engagement of Anthropologists in Public Dialogue with Members of Study Communities (Jane Hill, February 8, 2002) 5.7. The Yanomami Survival Fund (Jane Hill, May 1, 2002) 5.8. GIFTING:* A commentary, based on allegations in Tierney's Darkness in El Dorado (Janet Chernela, February 8, 2002) 5.9. Allegations of inappropriate sexual relationships with Yanomami (Jane Hill, April 8, 2002) 5.10. Warriors of the Amazon (Jane Hill (Ray Hames), February 8, 2002) PART VI: REPORTS AND ESSAYS 6.1. REPORTS 6.1.1 Turner Point by Point (Trudy Turner and Jeffrey Nelson, February 8, 2002) 6.1.1.a. Neel Journal Database 6.1.1.b. Neel Field Map 6.1.2. Tierney's use of Asch Sound Tapes (Jane Hill, February 20, 2002) 6.2. ESSAYS 6.2.1. The Case for Collective Responsibility and Reparations (Janet Chernela, April 5, 2002) 6.2.2. Re Chernela's "The Case for Collective Responsibility and Reparations" (Joe Watkins, May 2, 2002) 6.2.3. Freedom and comprehension: Deciphering ethical, genetic, and linguistic codes (a minority opinon) (Janet Chernela, April 5, 2002) 6.2.4. Roles, responsibilities, and relationships between anthropologists and indigenous people in the anthropological enterprise (Joe Watkins, May 1, 2002) Volume I, Page 3 *NOTE: The dates are original dates of posting. Revisions were made in many documents through May 1, 2002. The dates prior to May 1 help to identify documents where the original versions were part of the Working Papers posted as a preliminary report. PART VII: References Cited PART VIII: Appendix: Comments regarding the Working Papers of the El Dorado Task Force, submitted by anthropologists to the AAA web site February 10, 2002-April 19, 2002. The Task Force includes here comments by anthropologists on the Working Papers that make a substantive contribution to issues within the scope of the charge to the Task Force. These comments are included here with the permission of the authors. These comments were submitted before the completion of the final report, "Papers of the El Dorado Task Force." In some cases, issues raised in the comments are addressed in the final report. Note that the numbered sections of the working papers have been changed in the final report, but the documents still have similar (and in some cases the same) titles. All comments submitted, in addition to those included here, can be found on the AAA web web site. The Task Force thanks all those who have participated in the web site dialogue. Readers who read the final report on the web site should seek the comments referenced below on the site, using the "Search Comments" button and searching by the last name of the author. Bruce Albert , 2.3 Yanomami Names: "Comments on Napoleon Chagnon's methods of identification and name collecting among the Yanomami (03/10/02) Bruce Albert, 2.2. Informed consent and the 1968 Neel Expedition": Yanomami Rights to Informed Consent: Inverting the Perspective (2 parts) (04/19/02) Bruce Albert , 2.2. Informed consent and the 1968 Neel Expedition: " Federal Attorney General Office of Brazil launches investigation into Yanomami Blood Samples held in U.S. (04/19/02) Manuela Carneiro da Cunha , General Comment (04/13/02)* R. Brian Ferguson, 2.4. Involvement in Yanomami Political Affairs (03/20/02) Michael Fischer, General Comment (04/13/02) Michael Fischer, General Comment (04/18/02) Michael Fischer, 2.3 Yanomami Names (04/18/02) John Frechione, 2.1. The Measles Epidemic of 1968: "Interview with Dr. Brandon S. Centerwall" (04/19/02) Kenneth Good, 2.2 Informed Consent and the 1968 Neel Expedition (04/19/02) Kenneth Good, General Comment (04/19/02) Kenneth Good, 2.1. The Measles Epidemic of 1968 (04/19/02) Gail Goodwin Gomez, General Comment: "General Comments to the AAA El Dorado Task Force Submitted by Gale Goodwin Gomez, Ph.D." (03/07/02) Thomas Gregor , 3. Yanomami Statements "Comments on Yanomami Interviews and 'The Case for Collective Responsibility and Reparations'" (04/19/02) Edward Hagen, General Comment (04/19/02) Volume I, Page 4 Catherine Howard, 2.6 Allegations of Inappropriate Sexual Relationships: "The Sexual Life of Savants, or Putting Hill's Argument to Bed" (03/10/02) William Irons, 3.3. Interview with Davi Kopenawa: "Comment on Chernela's Interview with Davi Kopenawa" (03/08/02) William Irons, 4.1. Turner Point by Point (03/13/02) Jean Jackson, 2.5 Engagement of Anthros in Public Dialogue (03/10/02) Jean Jackson, 2.4. Involvement in Yanomami Political Affairs (03/10/02) Barbara Rose Johnston , 4. Essays and Reflections: "Elements of the Professional Life of James V. Neel as Reflected in the Declassified Literature on Human Radiation Experimentation" (04/12/02) Davi Kopenawa Yanomami, 3.3. Interview with Davi Kopenawa: "Davi Kopenawa Responds to William Irons" (04/15/02) Lêda Martins. 2.2 Informed Consent and the 1968 Neel Expedition (03/21/02) Leslie Sponsel, 1. Introduction (03/12/02) Leslie Sponsel, 2.7 Warriors of the Amazon (04/12/02) Leslie Sponsel, 2.6 Allegations of Inappropriate Sexual Relationships (4/17/02) Leslie Sponsel, General Comment (4/19/02) Terrence Turner, 4.1, Turner Point by Point: "Turner on Turner* on Turner , Point by Point by Point" (Parts 1 and 2) (3/21/02) Terence Turner, 2.1. The Measles Epidemic of 1968 (4/19/02) Juan J. R. Villarías-Robles, General Comment (02/27/02) *Carneira da Cunha's comment was posted during the period for comment on the Working Papers, which did not include a section on "Representations and portrayals of the Yanomami that may have had a negative impact." That section is now included in the summary statement "Some major allegations against Napoleon Chagnon." However her comment complements the remarks made there. Volume I, Page 5 PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN ANTHROPOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION EL DORADO TASK FORCE SUBMITTED AS A FINAL REPORT TO THE EXECUTIVE BOARD OF THE ASSOCIATION A Note on the Structure of the Report The report includes the following sections in two volumes. In Volume I, Part I, in addition to this overview note, there are: 1) A statement of the charge to the El Dorado Task Force 2) The Task Force's interpretation of the charge 3) Membership and procedures of the Task Force In Volume I, Part II, we present three introductory statements under the collective authorship of the members of the Task Force. In Volume II, we include the following sections: Part III offers some background materials on 1) The role of the American Anthropological Association in issues related to the Yanomami 2) Background information on the Yanomami 3) Yanomami Updates In Part IV, we present a set of interviews with and statements by Yanomami, collected, transcribed, and translated by Janet Chernela. In Part V there are 10 case studies. The case studies vary in length and represent the results of research conducted into the issues indicated by members of the Task Force. Many of the case studies are individually authored by members of the Task Force, who have undertaken the research necessary to complete the case study. Where a case study has only one or two authors, other members felt that they simply did not have the expertise to either confirm or deny the results reported in the case study. In Part VI, there are two reports and four essays.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Multilinear Euo Lution: Eaolution and Process'
    '1. Multilinear Euolution: Eaolution and Process' THEMEANING Of EVOLUIION Cultural evolution, although long an unfashionable concept, has commanded renewed interest in the last two decades. This interest does not indicate any seriousreconsideration of the particular historical reconstructions of the nineteenth-century evolutionists, for thesc were quite thoroughly discredited on empirical grounds. It arises from the potential methodological importance of cultural evolution for con- temporary research, from the implications of its scientific objectives, its taxonomic procedures, and its conceptualization of historical change and cultural causality. An appraisal of cultural evolution, therefore, must be concerned with definitions and meanings. But I do not wish to engage in semantics. I shall attempt to show that if certain distinc- tions in the concept of evolution are made, it is evident that certain methodological propositions find fairly wide acceptance today. In order to clear the ground, it is necessaryfirst to consider the meaning of cultural evolution in relation to biological evolution, for there is a wide tendency to consider the former as an extension of, I This chapter is adapted lrom "Evolution and Process," in Anthropology Today: An Encyclopedic Inaentory, ed. A. L. Kroeber (University of Chicago Press, 1953), pp. 313-26, by courtesy of The University of Chicago Press. l1 12 THEoR'- oF cuLTURE cIIANGE and thercfore analogousto, the latter. There is, of course,a relation- ship betrveen biological and cultural evolution in that a minimal dcvclopment of the Hominidae was a prccondition of culture. But cultural cvolution is an extension of biological evolution only in a chronological sense (Huxley, 1952). The nature of the cvolutionary schemesand of the devclopmental processesdiffers profoundly in.
    [Show full text]
  • Leslie White (1900-1975)
    Neoevolutionism Leslie White Julian Steward Neoevolutionism • 20th century evolutionists proposed a series of explicit, scientific laws liking cultural change to different spheres of material existence. • Although clearly drawing upon ideas of Marx and Engels, American anthropologists could not emphasize Marxist ideas due to reactionary politics. • Instead they emphasized connections to Tylor and Morgan. Neoevolutionism • Resurgence of evolutionism was much more apparent in U.S. than in Britain. • Idea of looking for systematic cultural changes through time fit in better with American anthropology because of its inclusion of archaeology. • Most important contribution was concern with the causes of change rather than mere historical reconstructions. • Changes in modes of production have consequences for other arenas of culture. • Material factors given causal priority Leslie White (1900-1975) • Personality and Culture 1925 • A Problem in Kinship Terminology 1939 • The Pueblo of Santa Ana 1942 • Energy and the Evolution of Culture 1943 • Diffusion Versus Evolution: An Anti- evolutionist Fallacy 1945 • The Expansion of the Scope of Science 1947 • Evolutionism in Cultural Anthropology: A Rejoinder 1947 • The Science of Culture 1949 • The Evolution of Culture 1959 • The Ethnology and Ethnography of Franz Boas 1963 • The Concept of Culture 1973 Leslie White • Ph.D. dissertation in 1927 on Medicine Societies of the Southwest from University of Chicago. • Taught by Edward Sapir. • Taught at University of Buffalo & University of Michigan. • Students included Marshall Sahlins and Elman Service. • A converted Boasian who went back to Morgan’s ideas of evolutionism after reading League of the Iroquois. • Culture is based upon symbols and uniquely human ability to symbolize. • White calls science of culture "culturology" • Claims that "culture grows out of culture" • For White, culture cannot be explained biologically or psychologically, but only in terms of itself.
    [Show full text]
  • 05 Neo-Evolutionism
    Paper No. : 10 Theories and methods in social and cultural Anthropology Module : 05 Neo-Evolutionism Development Team Principal Investigator Prof. Anup Kumar Kapoor Department of Anthropology, University of Delhi Paper Coordinator Prof. Anup Kumar Kapoor Department of Anthropology, University of Delhi Vineet Kumar Verma Content Writer Department of Anthropology, University of Delhi Prof. Subir Biswas, Department of Anthropology, West Content Reviewer Bengal State University, Barasat, West Bengal 1 Theories and methods in social and cultural Anthropology Anthropology Neo-Evolutionism Description of Module Subject Name Anthropology Paper Name 10 Theories and methods in social and cultural Anthropology Module Name/Title Neo-Evolutionism Module Id 05 2 Theories and methods in social and cultural Anthropology Anthropology Neo-Evolutionism Table of Contents Introduction 1. Early anthropological theory 2. History of nineteenth-century classical evolutionists 3. Neo-evolutionist 4. Neo-evolutionists Scholars V. Gordon Childe (England) Julian Steward (U.S.A) Leslie White (U.S.A) Summary Learning Objective To introduce history of anthropological thought by tracing its historical development To classify the course of historical development, academic, and Anthropological importance in terms of its development An attempt to look Methodological approaches to the origin of culture 3 Theories and methods in social and cultural Anthropology Anthropology Neo-Evolutionism Introduction A theoretical orientation is usually a general attitude about how cultural phenomena are to be explained. A number of thinkers during this period began to discuss evolution and how it might occur. The prevailing theoretical orientation in anthropology during the 19th century was based on a belief that culture generally evolves in a uniform and progressive manner; that is, most societies were believed to pass through the same series of stages, to arrive ultimately at a common end.
    [Show full text]
  • SM 3 History of the Personality of Anthropology
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by eVols at University of Hawaii at Manoa Savage Minds Occasional Papers No. 3 The History of the Personality of Anthropology By Alfred Kroeber Edited and with an introduction by Alex Golub First edition, 18 October, 2013 Savage Minds Occasional Papers 1. The Superorganic by Alfred Kroeber, edited and with an introduction by Alex Golub 2. Responses to “The Superorganic”: Texts by Alexander Goldenweiser and Edward Sapir, edited and with an introduction by Alex Golub 3. The History of the Personality of Anthropology by Alfred Kroeber, edited and with an introduction by Alex Golub Copyright information This original work is copyright by Alex Golub, 2013. The author has issued the work under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States license. You are free • to share - to copy, distribute and transmit the work • to remix - to adapt the work Under the following conditions • attribution - you must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author • noncommercial - you may not use this work for commercial purposes • share alike - if you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same or similar license to this one This work includes excerpts from Kroeber, Alfred. 1959. The history of the personality of anthropology. American Anthropologist 61 (3): 398-404. American Anthropological Association article content published before 1964 is in the public domain and may be used and copied without permission. For more information see http:// www.aaanet.org/publications/permissions.cfm. The original article appears at http:// onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1525/aa.1959.61.3.02a00040/abstract.
    [Show full text]
  • Sociocultural Evolution 1 Sociocultural Evolution
    Sociocultural evolution 1 Sociocultural evolution Sociocultural evolution(ism) is an umbrella term for theories of cultural evolution and social evolution, describing how cultures and societies have changed over time. Note that "sociocultural evolution" is not an equivalent of "sociocultural development" (unified processes of differentiation and integration involving increases in sociocultural complexity), as sociocultural evolution also encompasses sociocultural transformations accompanied by decreases of complexity (degeneration) as well as ones not accompanied by any significant changes of sociocultural complexity (cladogenesis).[1] Thus, sociocultural evolution can be defined as "the process by which structural reorganization is affected through time, eventually producing a form or structure which is qualitatively different from the ancestral form.... Evolutionism then becomes the scientific activity of finding nomothetic explanations for the occurrence of such structural changes".[2] Although such theories typically provide models for understanding the relationship between technologies, social structure, the values of a society, and how and why they change with time, they vary as to the extent to which they describe specific mechanisms of variation and social change. Historically, Europeans had tried to explain the meaning of "primitive" societies, with some arguing that primitive peoples had degenerated from a "barbarous" to an even lower "savage" state. These observers often saw European society as symbolizing the highest state of "civilization."[3] Over time, important commentators like Edward Burnett Tylor, Lewis Henry Morgan, Franz Boas, Leslie White, and Julian Steward elaborated on this thinking with theories from unilinear evolution to the "culture history" approach.[3] Sociocultural modeling[4] is an umbrella term for theories of cultural and social evolution, which aims to describe how cultures and societies have developed over time.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes and References
    Notes and References 1. Introduction 1. Seasonal variation and the division of labour among hunter-gatherers receives detailed attention in Chapter 5 (see also Condon, 1983). The particular point in this passage comes from the ethnographie film entitled People ofthe Seal, by Asen Balikci (see also Balikci, 1970). The famous Northwest Coast potlatch does not receive detailed treatment in this book, but some traditional analyses as weIl as new findings should be mentioned. Some traditional sources include: Boas, 1897, 1966; Drucker, 1955, 1965; DeLaguna, 1972; Oberg, 1973; Sapir and Swadesh, 1939; Codere, 1950; Mitchell and Donald, 1988. The fact that post-contact Northwest Coast economies encompass a complex mix of organisational features is documented by Donald (1984) and Mitchell 1984 (see also Isaac, 1988). The literature on the Trobriand Islands is substantial. The specific reference here is to Bronislaw Malinowski, Argonauts of the Western Pacifie (1922) and Coral Gardens and Their Magie (1935); see also Uberoi (1962). For material on the Dani see Karl Heider (1979). Barbara Myerhoff's book, Number Dur Days (1978), is the reference for the elderly Californian. On the Mudurucu see Murphy and Murphy (1974). The description ofthe Mexican grand­ mother's multiple roles is in Friedlander (1976). 2. Patch exploitation refers to optimal foraging models of hunter-gatherer economies. I deal more extensively with elements of optimal foraging models in Chapter 4. Discussions of classical political economy (Adam Smith and others) and of marginal utility economics (Alfred Marshall and others), I leave to the historians of economic thought. I elaborate the meaning of the concept of institution in the discussion of the institutional paradigm in Chapter 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from Second World War Anthropology Peripheral, Persuasive and Ignored Contributions
    Lessons from Second World War anthropology Peripheral, persuasive and ignored contributions DAVID PRICE Anthropologists were largely called upon to contribute their World War II and other past wars must be viewed in the David Price is Associate specialized knowledge to the war effort. The nature of the con- historical context of their times. The international anthro- Professor of Anthropology, St. tacts they had established with native peoples the world over pological community needs to be aware of past anthropo- Martin's College, Lacey, and the methods they had developed for understanding varied Washington, USA. A modes of life permitted them to give realistic aid to intelligence logical contributions to war, and we need to critically forthcoming essay examines units, or to those carrying on economic and psychological war- evaluate these past activities not in order to criticize past some of the ways in which fare and to advise concerning many types of postwar programs anthropologists, but to help provide a framework for anthropological interactions with military and intelligence of rehabilitation. coping with present and future pressures for anthropolo- agencies in the Cold War ‘Anthropology 1944’ gists to contribute to military and intelligence operations. became increasingly Britannica Book of the Year 1944 While past wartime anthropological decisions may be seen complicated and ignored. His as appropriate for their times, the context of contemporary email is [email protected]. The well established links between anthropologists and wars raises many more complex and problematic issues. colonialism documented in the work of scholars like Talal Asad, Kathleen Gough, Dell Hymes, Adam Kuper and WWII: Anthropological warfare comes of age George Stocking stand in marked contrast with the sparse The First World War brought a significant anthropological I am grateful for comments from analysis of anthropological contributions to the wars of the showdown, with implications for the wars that followed.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of the Anthropological Theories
    International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Vol. 4, No. 10(1); August 2014 An Overview of the Anthropological Theories Nurazzura Mohamad Diah Head Department of Sociology & Anthropology International Islamic University Malaysia Dewan Mahboob Hossain Associate Professor Department of Accounting & Information Systems University of Dhaka Bangladesh Sohela Mustari PhD Student Department of Sociology & Anthropology International Islamic University Malaysia Noor Syafika Ramli Master in Anthropology Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Abstract Theories are treated as the lifeblood of the disciplines like sociology and anthropology. As a newer discipline that has grown approximately over the last two hundred years, anthropology has proposed different important theories on man and culture. This article presents with an overview of the theories of anthropology developed over the last two hundred years. This can be considered as a general summarized reading of the important anthropological theories like evolutionism, diffusionism, historical particularism, functionalism, culture and personality, structuralism, neo-evolutionism, cultural ecology, cultural materialism, postmodernist and feminist explanations. This article concludes that though each of these theories was criticized by the subsequent theorists, all these theories contributed a lot in the development of anthropology as a discipline. Keywords: anthropology, theory, anthropological theory 1.0. Introduction In the academic arena, anthropology is considered as a relatively new discipline as its major development mainly happened in the nineteenth and the twentieth centuries. Though, in France and Germany, this discipline got a momentum in the seventeenth and the eighteenth centuries in different names (like ethnology, Volkskunde, Volkerkunde etc.), in English, the word ‘anthropology’ first appeared in the year of 1805 (McGee and Warms, 2012; 6).
    [Show full text]
  • V. 2/11/97 Evolutionism and Its Critics by Stephen K. Sanderson
    Evolutionism and its Critics by Stephen K. Sanderson Department of Sociology Indiana University of Pennsylvania v. 2/11/97 (cJ1997 Stephen K. Sanderson Cite: Sanderson, Stephen K. (1997). "Evolutionism and its Critics." Journal ofWorld­ Systems Research 3: 94 - 114. Evolutionary theories have held a prominent place in the history of the social sciences. Although there are many kinds of evolutionary theories, the essential element that they hold in common is their assumption that history is more than just a series of particular and unique events. On the contrary, the evolutionist assumption is that history revea ls a certain directionality in the sense that there are similar processes occurrin g at similar times, at various points throughout the globe. The best of thes e theories do not limit themselves to simply describing directional patterns, but go on to provid e some sort of model or causal explanation for the observed sequence or sequences . The social sciences, sociology and anthropology in particular, have long enjoyed a love ­ hate relationship with evolutionary theories of society, with the periods of love alternating with periods of hate in a striking pattern of ebb and flow. The second half of the nineteenth century -- the period when sociology and anthropology wer e born as social-scientific disciplines -- was overwhelmingly a period oflo ve. Most anthropological thinking, and a large amount of sociological thinking, was evolutionary in nature . In anthropology the two most important evolutionary theorists were Lewis Henry Morgan (1974[1877]) and Edward Burnett Tylor (1871), both among th e mo st important founding fathers of that discipline.
    [Show full text]
  • Steward, White, Service Neo-Evolutionary Anthropology Developed in the Mid-Twentieth Century As a Response T
    ANTHROPOLOGY THOUGHT JUNE 2019 Neo-Evolutionists: Steward, White, Service Neo-evolutionary anthropology developed in the mid-Twentieth Century as a response to the need to develop theories that better explained cultural differences, similarities and the processes of culture change than the British Structural-Functionalists or the American Historical Particularists. The need was especially felt in archeology for an empirical method that could be used to categorize types of societies from material evidence. This new theoretical perspective incorporated evolutionary theory with Marxism, Structural-Functionalism of British anthropology, the American Historical Particularists and other perspectives. Neo-evolutionists Julian Steward, Leslie White influenced their successors at Columbia University Elman Service, Morton Fried, Marvin Harris and Sidney Mintz . The following essay will compare and contrast the explanations for social evolution of Steward and White and that of their successors Service and Fried. Julian Steward (1902-1974) Julian Steward, an archeologist of Native American hunter-gatherer cultures, established a taxonomy for categorizing cultures based on the material evidence of their “social, political, and religious patterns” that were “empirically determined” by their “cultural core”. A society’s “cultural core” according to Steward was composed of a “constellation of features which are most closely related to subsistence activities and economic arrangements”–or in other words the natural and social environment . Steward called his study of the process of culture change “cultural ecology.” Cultural ecology is a term he coined to explain culture as an adaptation of a society to their environment. Like the evolutionists that preceded him, Steward believed that “significant cross-cultural regularities exist” among societies.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Annual Meeting
    Central States Anthropological Society 2015 annual meeting PROGRAM April 9-11, 2015 Crowne Plaza St. Paul-Riverfront Hotel St. Paul, Minnesota Crowne Plaza St. Paul-Riverfront Hotel, Lower Level Most conference events will take place on the hotel’s Lower Level. The distinguished lecture and reception on Friday are in the Great River Ballroom on Level 1. The business lunch on Saturday is in the Windows Room on the 22nd floor. Two break-out sessions are in Kellogg 1 on the Lobby Level. CSAS Welcomes You to Its 2015 Annual Meeting! Welcome to the 2015 Annual Meeting of the Central States Anthropological Society. This is our 94th meeting, and of all the sections of the American Anthropological Association, we are the oldest (almost as old as the AAA itself). While our past may not be exactly as glorious as an historical romance novel, it's certainly been illustrious, and has at various times sheltered some of the most notable names in the history of anthropology, from Fay-Cooper Cole, Leslie White, Edward Sapir, and Oscar Lewis. So from its very beginnings, the CSAS has taken the four-field approach to the discipline, as initially advocated by Franz Boas, very seriously. In this so-called postmodernist, poststructuralist, post-industrialized, transnational, globally-interconnected world—which ironically has seen the splintering of many academic disciplines (including, at times, anthropology)—it is consoling to know that there are still places where linguists can see the value in talking to biologists, and ethnographers dig archaeologists. The CSAS offers such a venue—where professionals and students alike can engage in thought-provoking and focused debate in a respectful and unpretentious atmosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 22, Issue 1
    History of Anthropology Newsletter Volume 22 Issue 1 June 1995 Article 1 January 1995 Volume 22, Issue 1 Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/han Part of the Anthropology Commons, and the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine Commons Recommended Citation (1995) "Volume 22, Issue 1," History of Anthropology Newsletter: Vol. 22 : Iss. 1 , Article 1. Available at: https://repository.upenn.edu/han/vol22/iss1/1 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/han/vol22/iss1/1 For more information, please contact [email protected]. is ory of ' nthropology ewsletter XXII:l 1995 History of Anthropology Newsletter VOLUME XXII, NUMBER 1 June 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOOTNOTES FOR THE HISTORY OF ANTHROPOLOGY A Stage our Ancestors Went Through . 3 CLIO'S FANCY: DOCUMENTS TO PIQUE THE HISTORICAL IMAGINATION The Soviet Response to Leslie White, c. 1932 . 7 SOURCES FOR THE HISTORY OF ANTHROPOLOGY I. Preserving the Anthropological Record . 9 II. Guide to the National Anthropological Archives .................. 10 RESEARCH IN PROGRESS I. Individual Projects .................... ·.................. 11 II. French Anthropological Institutions .......................... 12 BIBLIOGRAPHICA ARCANA I. Anthropologies of the South . 12 II. Recent Dissertations .................................... 12 III. Work by Subscribers ................................... 13 IV. Suggested by Our Readers ................................ 15 The Editorial Committee Robert Bieder Regna Darnell Indiana University University
    [Show full text]