2016. the Evaluation
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
IUCN World Heritage Evaluations 2016 IUCN Evaluations of nominations of natural and mixed properties to the World Heritage List WHC/16/40.COM/INF.8B2 IUCN REPORT FOR THE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE, 40TH SESSION, ISTANBUL, TURKEY, 10-20 JULY 2016 Cover page photo: Waterways are the arteries of Pimachiowin Aki, carrying the lifeblood of the land and the people. © H. Otake 2004 IUCN Evaluations of Nominations of Natural and Mixed Properties to the World Heritage List Table of Contents Executive summary table Alphabetical index and IUCN field evaluators Introduction A. Natural Properties Page n° A1. New Nominations of Natural Properties Asia / Pacific China – Hubei Shennongjia 3 Iran (Islamic Republic of) – Lut Desert 15 Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan – Western Tien-Shan 25 Turkmenistan – Mountain Ecosystems of Koytendag 39 Europe / North America Canada – Mistaken Point 53 Russian Federation – Virgin Komi Forests [Significant boundary modification] 63 Russian Federation – Western Caucasus [Significant boundary modification] 71 Latin America / Caribbean Mexico – Archipiélago de Revillagigedo A2. Referred Nominations of Natural Properties Asia / Pacific Thailand – Kaeng Krachan Forest Complex See document WHC/16/40.COM/INF.8B2.Add Arab States Sudan – Sanganeb Marine National Park and Dungonab Bay - Mukkawar Island Marine National Park See document WHC/16/40.COM/INF.8B2.Add Europe / North America France – Tectono-volcanic Ensemble of the Chaine des Puys and Limagne Fault See document WHC/16/40.COM/INF.8B2.Add A3. Minor Boundary Modifications of Natural Properties Europe / North America United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland – Giant's Causeway and Causeway Coast See document WHC/16/40.COM/INF.8B2.Add B. Mixed Properties Page n° B1. New Nominations of Mixed Properties Africa Chad – Ennedi Massif: natural and cultural landscape 81 Arab States Iraq – The Ahwar of Southern Iraq: refuge of biodiversity and the relict landscape of the Mesopotamian Cities 97 Asia / Pacific India – Khangchendzonga National Park 109 B2. Deferred Nominations of Mixed Properties Europe / North America Canada – Pimachiowin Aki 135 B3. Minor Boundary Modifications of Mixed Properties Asia / Pacific Viet Nam – Trang An Landscape Complex See document WHC/16/40.COM/INF.8B2.Add C. Cultural Properties Page n° C1. New Nominations of Cultural Landscapes Asia / Pacific China – Zuojiang Huashan Rock Art Cultural Landscape 149 Thailand – Phu Phrabat Historical Park 153 Europe / North America Turkey – Ani Cultural Landscape 157 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TABLE OF IUCN EVALUATIONS TO THE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE OUTSTANDING UNIVERSAL VALUE Meets protection and Meets one or more natural criteria Meets conditions of integrity management Name of the requirements State ) / Note ) ) ) property vii viii ix x Party ( ( ( ( (ID number) on in rotecti Criterion Criterion Criterion Criterion Criterion Integrity Boundaries Threats addressed Justification of serial approach Protection status Management zone Buffer P surrounding arrea Paragraphs of the Operational 78, 108- required ission Guidelines for the 118, 77 77 77 77 78, 87-95 99-102 78, 98 137 78, 132.4 103-107 Implementation of the World 132.4, Heritage Convention 135 m Further IUCN Recommendation Hubei Shennongjia China ̶ ̶ yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes no I (1509) Iran (Islamic Lut Desert part part ̶ ̶ part part yes ̶ part no part no R Republic of) (1505) Kazakhstan, Western Tien-Shan Kyrgyzstan, ̶ no ̶ part no no part part part no part yes D (1490) Uzbekistan Mountain Ecosystems Turkmenistan of Koytendag no ̶ no no no no part ̶ part yes part no N (1521) Mistaken Point Canada yes yes yes yes yes yes yes no I (1497) ̶ ̶ ̶ ̶ Significant Russian Virgin Komi Forests boundary no ̶ no ̶ no no no ̶ no no no no N Federation (719 Bis) modification Significant Russian Western Caucasus boundary ̶ ̶ no no no no no no no no no no N Federation (900 Bis) modification OUTSTANDING UNIVERSAL VALUE Meets protection and Meets one or more natural criteria Meets conditions of integrity management Name of the requirements State ) / Note ) ) ) property vii viii ix x Party ( ( ( ( (ID number) on in rotecti Criterion Criterion Criterion Criterion Criterion Integrity Boundaries Threats addressed Justification of serial approach Protection status Management zone Buffer P surrounding arrea Paragraphs of the Operational 78, 108- required ission Guidelines for the 118, 77 77 77 77 78, 87-95 99-102 78, 98 137 78, 132.4 103-107 Implementation of the World 132.4, Heritage Convention 135 m Further IUCN Recommendation Archipiélago de Mexico Revillagigedo yes no yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes no I (1510) Ennedi Massif: natural Chad and cultural landscape Mixed site part ̶ part ̶ no no no ̶ no no no yes D (1475) The Ahwar of Southern Iraq: refuge of Iraq Mixed site part part part part part part no no no yes D biodiversity and the relict ̶ ̶ landscape (1481) Khangchendzonga India National Park Mixed site yes ̶ ̶ yes yes yes yes ̶ yes yes yes no I (1513) Pimachiowin Aki Canada Mixed site ̶ ̶ yes ̶ yes yes yes ̶ yes yes yes no I (1415 Rev) KEYS yes met I inscribe / approve part partially met N non inscribe / approve no not met R refer ̶ not applicable D defer ALPHABETICAL INDEX State Party ID No. Property Page Canada 1497 Mistaken Point 53 Canada 1415 Rev Pimachiowin Aki 135 Chad 1475 Ennedi Massif: natural and cultural landscape 97 China 1509 Hubei Shennongjia 3 India 1513 Khangchendzonga National Park 121 Iran 1505 Lut Desert 15 The Ahwar of Southern Iraq: refuge of biodiversity and the relict Iraq 1481 109 landscape of the Mesopotamian Cities Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, 1490 Western Tien-Shan 25 Uzbekistan Mexico 1510 Archipiélago de Revillagigedo 81 Russian Federation 719 Bis Virgin Komi Forests [Significant boundary modification] 71 Russian Federation 900 Bis Western Caucasus [Significant boundary modification] 81 Turkmenistan 1521 Mountain Ecosystems of Koytendag 39 IUCN FIELD EVALUATORS Site Name Mistaken Point Mohd Shafeea Leman Pimachiowin Aki Bastian Bertzky Ennedi Massif: natural and cultural landscape Guy Debonnet Hubei Shennongjia Bruce Jefferies Khangchendzonga National Park Tilman Jaeger Lut Desert Paul Williams & Maher Mahjoub The Ahwar of Southern Iraq: refuge of biodiversity and Faisal Abu-Izzeddin the relict landscape of the Mesopotamian Cities Western Tien-Shan Elena Osipova & Kyung Sik Woo Archipiélago de Revillagigedo Wendy Strahm & German Soler Virgin Komi Forests [Significant boundary modification] Nikita Lopoukine Western Caucasus [Significant boundary modification] Carlo Ossola & Chimed Ochir Bazarsad Mountain Ecosystems of Koytendag Sarangoo Radnaaragchaa & Remco van Merm It should be noted that the IUCN field evaluators are part of a broader evaluation approach detailed in the introduction of this report. THE WORLD HERITAGE CONVENTION IUCN TECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT OF WORLD HERITAGE NOMINATIONS APRIL 2016 1. INTRODUCTION Economic and Social Policy); from international earth science unions, non-governmental organizations and This technical evaluation report of natural and mixed scientific contacts in universities and other properties nominated for inclusion on the World international agencies. This highlights the considerable Heritage List has been conducted by the World “added value” from investing in the use of the Heritage Programme of IUCN (International Union for extensive networks of IUCN and partner institutions. Conservation of Nature). The World Heritage Programme co-ordinates IUCN’s input to the World These networks allow for the increasing involvement of Heritage Convention in close cooperation with the regional natural heritage experts and broaden the IUCN Global Protected Areas Programme (GPAP) and capacity of IUCN with regard to its work under the other units of IUCN both at headquarters and in the World Heritage Convention. Reports from field regions. It also works closely with IUCN’s World missions and comments from a large number of Commission on Protected Areas (WCPA), the world’s external reviewers are comprehensively examined by leading expert network of protected area managers the IUCN World Heritage Panel, as key inputs to each and specialists, and other Commissions, members and evaluation. The IUCN World Heritage Programme partners of IUCN. prepares the final technical evaluation reports which are presented in this document and represent the IUCN’s evaluations are conducted according to the corporate position of IUCN on World Heritage Operational Guidelines that the World Heritage evaluations. IUCN has also placed emphasis on Committee has agreed, and which are the essential providing input and support to ICOMOS in relation to framework for the application of the evaluation those cultural landscapes which have important natural process. This framework was updated and revised in values. 2015, and a revised process documented in Annex 6 of the Operational Guidelines, following discussion by IUCN has continued to extend its cooperation with the World Heritage Committee. In carrying out its ICOMOS, including coordination in relation to the function under the World Heritage Convention, IUCN evaluation of mixed sites and cultural landscapes. has been guided by four principles: IUCN and ICOMOS have also enhanced the coordination of their panel processes as requested by (i) ensuring the highest standards of quality control, the World Heritage Committee. This cooperation was institutional memory and consistency in relation to reported at the 40th Session of the World Heritage technical evaluation, monitoring