DOCSLIB.ORG

Morogoro Region Socio-Economic Profile

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Morogoro Region Socio-Economic Profile THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA MOROGORO REGION SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE UGANDA RWANDA KENYA BURUNDI MOROGORO ZAMBIA MSUMBIJI Joint Publication by: THE PLANNING COMMISSION DAR ES SALAAM and REGIONAL COMMISSIONER'S OFFICE MOROGORO TABLE OF CONTENTS Page FOREWORD............................................................................................v SECTION I..............................................................................................1 1.0 LAND, PEOPLE AND CLIMATE ...................................................1 1.1 GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION:..................................................................1 1.2 LAND AREA :........................................................................................1 1.3 ADMINISTRATIVE UNITS ......................................................................2 1.4 ETHNIC GROUPS:..................................................................................2 1.5 POPULATION SIZE, GROWTH AND DENSITY..........................................3 1.6 MIGRATION:....................................................................................... 19 1.7 EMPLOYMENT:................................................................................... 22 1.8 CLIMATE:........................................................................................... 27 1.9 AGRO-ECOLOGICAL ZONES:................................................................. 27 SECTION II ..........................................................................................29 REGIONAL ECONOMY......................................................................29 2.1 INTRODUCTION: ................................................................................. 29 2.2 REGIONAL GDP AND PER CAPITA GDP:............................................. 30 2.3 PRODUCTIVE SECTORS:....................................................................... 37 2.3.1 Agriculture:.................................................................................. 37 2.3.2 Livestock:.................................................................................... 61 2.3.3 Forestry:...................................................................................... 75 2.3.4 FISHERIES:................................................................................ 85 2.3.5 Beekeeping:................................................................................. 91 2.3.6 Wildlife:....................................................................................... 94 2.3.7 Industrial Development: ................................................................ 96 SECTION III.........................................................................................98 ECONOMIC INFRASTRUCTURE .....................................................98 3.1 ROAD NETWORK ........................................................................... 98 i ROAD NETWORK - MOROGORO ..................................................... 101 3.2 RAILWAY NETWORK:...................................................................... 102 3.3 AIR TRANSPORT .............................................................................. 102 3.4 COMMUNICATION NETWORK.......................................................... 102 3.5 ENERGY ......................................................................................... 104 3.5.1 Electricity .................................................................................. 104 3.5.2 Fuelwood. .................................................................................. 105 3.5.3 Fossil fuels ................................................................................. 106 SECTION IV .......................................................................................108 SOCIAL SERVICES ...........................................................................108 4.1 EDUCATION SECTOR................................................................... 108 4.1.1 PRE-SCHOOLS (NURSERY SCHOOLS) ............................................... 108 4.1.2 PRIMARY SCHOOL EDUCATION...................................................... 109 4.1.2.1 Number of Schools and Enrolment............................................ 109 4.1.2.2 Pupil Dropouts:........................................................................ 118 4.1.2.3 Primary School Building ........................................................... 127 4.1.2.4 Teachers:................................................................................ 128 4.1.2.5 Some Primary Education Criteria:............................................. 129 4.1.3 SECONDARY SCHOOL EDUCATION:................................................. 135 4.1.4 ADULT EDUCATION:...................................................................... 141 4.1.5 VOCATIONAL TRAINING:............................................................... 146 4.2 HEALTH SECTOR.......................................................................... 147 4.2.1 Introduction................................................................................ 147 4.2.2 Health facilities:.......................................................................... 148 4.2.3 Life Expectancy:........................................................................ 153 4.2.4 Infant and Under Five Mortality:.................................................. 154 4.2.5 Maternal Mortality:..................................................................... 158 4.2.6 Immunization of Children:............................................................ 159 4.2.7 Chidlren Malnutrition:.................................................................. 160 4.2.8 AIDS:........................................................................................ 162 4.2.9 Tuberculosis and Leprosy:........................................................... 165 4.2.10 Epidemics:................................................................................ 165 4.2.11 Cost Sharing:............................................................................ 167 4.3 WATER SECTOR:........................................................................... 168 ii 4.3.1 Introduction................................................................................ 168 4.3.2 Rural Water Supplies:................................................................. 171 4.2.3 Urban Water Supplies:................................................................ 171 4.3.4 Morogoro Town Water Supply: ................................................... 172 4.3.5 Sanitation................................................................................... 172 SECTION V.........................................................................................175 OTHER DEVELOPMENT ISSUES ...................................................175 5.1 WOMEN DEVELOPMENT:............................................................ 175 5.2 COOPERATIVES:........................................................................... 176 5.3 NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS 9NGOS). ................. 179 5.4 REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES SUPPORTED BY ONORS ...... 182 5.5 YOUTH DEVELOPMENT:.................................................................... 183 5.6 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION:................................................... 185 5.7 TOURISM ....................................................................................... 186 SECTION VI .......................................................................................188 PONTENTIAL INVESTMENT AREAS ............................................188 6.1 AGRICULTURE.............................................................................. 188 6.2 LIVESTOCK:...................................................................................... 190 6.3 TRANSPORT: .................................................................................... 190 6.4 HEALTH:.......................................................................................... 191 6.5 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ........................................................ 192 6.6 TOURISM ......................................................................................... 192 6.7 MINING: ........................................................................................... 194 6.8 EDUCATION: .................................................................................... 194 6.9 FORESTRY: ....................................................................................... 195 6.10 FISHERIES:...................................................................................... 195 6.11 BEEKEEPING:................................................................................... 195 6.12 WATER SUPPLIES:........................................................................... 196 6.13 WOMEN DEVELOPMENT:................................................................. 196 6.14 INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT:........................................................... 197 iii ANNEX A ............................................................................................198 Morogoro Region in a Nutshell ............................................................ 198 ANNEX B ............................................................................................205 Morogoro Rural District...................................................................... 205 ANNEX C ............................................................................................208 Morogoro Urban
Load more

Recommended publications
  • USAID Tanzania Activity Briefer May 2020
    TANZANIA ACTIVITY BRIEFER MAY 2020 For over five decades, the United States has partnered with the people of Tanzania to advance shared development objectives. The goal of USAID assistance is to help the country achieve self- reliance by promoting a healthy, prosperous, democratic, well- governed, and secure Tanzania. Through partnerships and investments that save lives, reduce poverty, and strengthen democratic governance, USAID’s programs advance a free, peaceful, and prosperous Tanzania. In Tanzania, USAID engages in activities across four areas: ● Economic growth, including trade, agriculture, food security, and natural resource management ● Democracy, human rights, and governance ● Education ● Global health LARRIEUX/ USAID ALEX ALEX ECONOMIC GROWTH OVERVIEW: USAID supports Tanzania’s economic development and goal to become a self-reliant, middle- income country by 2025. We partner with the government and people of Tanzania, the private sector, and a range of development stakeholders. Agriculture plays a vital role in Tanzania’s economy, employing 65 percent of the workforce and contributing to nearly 30 percent of the economy. USAID strengthens the agriculture policy environment and works directly with actors along the production process to improve livelihoods and trade. At the same time, we strengthen the ability of rural communities to live healthy, productive lives through activities that improve 1 nutrition and provide access to clean water and better sanitation and hygiene. We also enhance the voices of youth and women in decision making by building leadership skills and access to assets, such as loans and land ownership rights. As Tanzania’s natural resources are the foundation for the country’s development, we work to protect globally important wildlife, remarkable ecosystems, and extraordinary natural resources.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Tanzania in Figures
    2019 Tanzania in Figures The United Republic of Tanzania 2019 TANZANIA IN FIGURES National Bureau of Statistics Dodoma June 2020 H. E. Dr. John Pombe Joseph Magufuli President of the United Republic of Tanzania “Statistics are very vital in the development of any country particularly when they are of good quality since they enable government to understand the needs of its people, set goals and formulate development programmes and monitor their implementation” H.E. Dr. John Pombe Joseph Magufuli the President of the United Republic of Tanzania at the foundation stone-laying ceremony for the new NBS offices in Dodoma December, 2017. What is the importance of statistics in your daily life? “Statistical information is very important as it helps a person to do things in an organizational way with greater precision unlike when one does not have. In my business, for example, statistics help me know where I can get raw materials, get to know the number of my customers and help me prepare products accordingly. Indeed, the numbers show the trend of my business which allows me to predict the future. My customers are both locals and foreigners who yearly visit the region. In June every year, I gather information from various institutions which receive foreign visitors here in Dodoma. With estimated number of visitors in hand, it gives me ample time to prepare products for my clients’ satisfaction. In terms of my daily life, Statistics help me in understanding my daily household needs hence make proper expenditures.” Mr. Kulwa James Zimba, Artist, Sixth street Dodoma.”. What is the importance of statistics in your daily life? “Statistical Data is useful for development at family as well as national level because without statistics one cannot plan and implement development plans properly.
    [Show full text]
  • Socio-Economic Baseline Survey of Villages Adjacent to the Vidunda Catchment Area, Bordering Udzungwa Mountains National Park
    Socio-Economic Baseline Survey of Villages Adjacent to the Vidunda Catchment Area, Bordering Udzungwa Mountains National Park Incorporating a Socio-Economic Monitoring Plan for 29 Villages North and East of the Udzungwa Mountains National Park Paul Harrison November 2006 WORLD WIDE FUND FOR NATURE TANZANIA PROGRAMME OFFICE (WWF-TPO) WITH SUPPORT FROM WWF NORWAY AND NORAD Socio-Economic Baseline Survey of Villages Adjacent to the Vidunda Catchment Area, Bordering Udzungwa Mountains National Park Report compiled by Paul Harrison, Kilimanyika Produced on behalf of WWF Tanzania Programme Office, P. O. Box 63117, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania Co-Financed by NORAD and WWF Norway All photographs © Kilimanyika, unless otherwise stated. A series of photographs accompanying this report may be obtained by contacting Kilimanyika The views expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect those of WWF Tanzania, WWF Norway or NORAD. Bankipore House High Street Brill, Bucks HP18 9ST, UK Tel. +44 7739 803 704 Email: [email protected] Web: www.kilimanyika.com 2 Paul Harrison/Kilimanyika for WWF Tanzania Table of Contents Tables and Figures..............................................................................................................................................4 Abbreviations and Acronyms .............................................................................................................................5 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • FOREWORD the Lindi Municipality Is One of the Major Coastal Towns Of
    FOREWORD I wish to recognize and commend all stakeholders who in one way or another contributed to the completion of the preparation of this master plan, starting with the Lindi Municipal Council who were The Lindi Municipality is one of the major coastal towns of Tanzania and a transit centre from Dar es the mentors of the idea of preparing it and supervised its process as a planning authority, the Lindi Salaam to Mtwara and Songea regions, and the Republic of Mozambique through the Umoja Bridge in District Council who shared the preparation and agreed to include the Wards of Mchinga and Kiwalala Mtwara Region. The town is well-endowed with rich agricultural and other natural resources hinterland, on the plan, the World Bank who funded it, the Consultants (JAGBENS Planners &JMZ Landfields including, inter alia, cashewnut, coconut and the normal cereal crops. Salt farming and fishing are also Ltd), the Lindi Regional Administrative Secretariat, technical teams, the public and private institutions prominent in, around and outside the town. Livestock keeping, particularly cattle, sheep, goats and and individuals. I remain hopeful that this Master Plan will be used in good course and as a tool to poultry is an upcoming production activity. The region has 28percent of its land covered by Selous guide the sustainable development of Lindi town and the Wards of Mchinga and Kiwalala inLindi Game reserve and many natural forest reserves. When talking of the future prosperity of Lindi, one District. cannot overlook a planned establishment within the municipality; a giant LNG Plant proposed to commence in 2020/2021.
    [Show full text]
  • SAGCOT) Public Disclosure Authorized Investment Project
    THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA PRIME MINISTER’S OFFICE Public Disclosure Authorized Southern Agricultural Growth Corridor of Tanzania (SAGCOT) Public Disclosure Authorized Investment Project SRATEGIC REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL Public Disclosure Authorized AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT (SRESA) This SRESA report was prepared for the Government of Tanzania by Environmental Resources Management Limited (ERM) under a contract as part of SAGCOT preparatory activities Public Disclosure Authorized DECEMBER 2013 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 BACKGROUND 1 1.2 PROGRAMMEOVERVIEW 1 1.3 STUDY OBJECTIVE 2 1.4 PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT 3 1.5 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY 3 1.5.1 Overview 3 1.5.2 Screening 4 1.5.3 Scoping 4 1.5.4 Baseline Description 4 1.5.5 Scenario Development 4 1.5.6 Impact Assessment 5 1.5.7 Development of Mitigation Measures 5 1.5.8 Consultation 6 1.5.9 Constraints and Limitations 6 1.6 REPORT LAYOUT 6 2 THE SOUTHERN AGRICULTURAL GROWTH CORRIDOR OF TANZANIA 8 2.1 THE SAGCOT PROGRAMME 8 2.1.1 The SAGCOT Concept 8 2.1.2 SAGCOT Organisation 11 2.2 PROPOSED WORLD BANK SUPPORTED SAGCOT INVESTMENT PROJECT 14 2.2.1 General 14 2.2.2 Catalytic Fund 15 2.2.3 Support Institutions 16 3 THE AGRICULTURE SECTOR IN TANZANIA 20 3.1 INTRODUCTION 20 3.2 AGRICULTURE AND THE TANZANIAN ECONOMY 20 3.2.1 Overview 20 3.2.2 Land Use 25 3.3 PRIORITIES FOR DEVELOPMENT OF THE AGRICULTURE SECTOR 25 3.3.1 Current Initiatives for Agricultural Development 25 3.3.2 Rationale for SAGCOT Programme 29 3.3.3 District Level Agricultural Planning 30 3.4 FINANCING POLICIES
    [Show full text]
  • Kilombero Valley, United Republic of Tanzania
    Kilombero Valley, United Republic of Tanzania Ramsar Site No. 1173 Ramsar Advisory Mission Report April 2017 Ed Wilson, Robert McInnes, Damas Patrick Mbaga and Paul Ouedraogo i [Page left blank for double-sided printing] ii Contents 1. Background ................................................................................................................ 1 1.1. Overview of the wetlands of Tanzania.............................................................. 1 1.2. Kilombero Valley Ramsar Site: Ecological character description ...................... 2 1.3. Background to the Ramsar Advisory Mission ................................................... 5 1.4. Importance of the RAM recommendations ....................................................... 7 2. Hydrological and wider context of the Kilombero Valley Ramsar Site .................. 8 2.1. Background ..................................................................................................... 8 2.2. The Rufiji River basin ....................................................................................... 9 2.3. Hydrology of the Rufiji River basin ................................................................. 10 2.4. Management of water in the Rufiji River Basin ............................................... 10 2.5. The Kilombero River sub-basin ...................................................................... 13 2.6. Governance structures in the Kilombero River sub-basin ............................... 15 2.7. Economic activities .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Demographic and Socio-Economic Profile
    The United Republic of Tanzania Basic Demographic and Socio-Economic Profile National Bureau of Statistics Ministry of Finance Dar es Salaam and Office of Chief Government Statistician Ministry of State, President ’s Office, State House and Good Governance Zanzibar April, 2014 UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA, ADMINISTRATIVE BOUNDARIES Basic Demographic and Socio-Economic Profile Foreword The 2012 Population and Housing Census (PHC) for the United Republic of Tanzania was carried out on the 26th August, 2012. This was the fifth Census after the Union of Tanganyika and Zanzibar in 1964. Other censuses were carried out in 1967, 1978, 1988 and 2002. The 2012 PHC, like previous censuses, will contribute to the improvement of quality of life of Tanzanians through the provision of current and reliable data for policy formulation, development planning and service delivery as well as for monitoring and evaluating national and international development frameworks. The 2012 PHC is unique as the collected information will be used in monitoring and evaluating the Development Vision 2025 for Tanzania Mainland and Zanzibar Development Vision 2020, Five Year Development Plan 2011/12–2015/16, National Strategy for Growth and Reduction of Poverty (NSGRP) commonly known as MKUKUTA and Zanzibar Strategy for Growth and Reduction of Poverty (ZSGRP) commonly known as MKUZA. The Census will also provide information for the evaluation of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) in 2015. The Poverty Monitoring Master Plan, which is the monitoring tool for NSGRP and ZSGRP, mapped out core indicators for poverty monitoring against the sequence of surveys, with the 2012 PHC being one of them. Several of these core indicators for poverty monitoring are measured directly from the 2012 PHC.
    [Show full text]
  • Mvomero District, Morogoro Region)
    January 2015 LOCAL EDUCATION SECTOR GOVERNANCE IN TANZANIA Mapping monitoring and evaluation actors, activities and use in two selected villages of Mzumbe ward (Mvomero District, Morogoro Region) Preliminary Findings Nathalie HOLVOET and Liesbeth INBERG Institute of Development Policy and Management, University of Antwerp Elisabeth LULU and Yona MATEKERE Institute of Development Studies, Mzumbe University, Tanzania Table of Content 0. Preface 4 1. Introduction 5 2. Conceptual framework 8 3. Methodology 10 3.1. Data collection 10 3.2. Data selection and location 11 3.3. Limitations 12 4. Bio-physical conditions 13 4.1. Inputs to the education sector 13 4.2. Education activities and outputs 16 4.2.1. Morogoro Region 17 4.2.2. Mvomero District 19 4.2.3. Changarawe and Vikenge 19 5. Rules in use 26 5.1. Rules in use (formal) 26 5.1.1. Decentralisation 26 5.1.2. Open Government Partnership and Big Results Now 27 5.1.3. Education 27 5.2. Rules in use (informal) 29 6. Community attributes 30 6.1. Political context 30 6.2. Governance context 31 6.3. Socio-economic context 32 6.4. Cultural context 35 6.5. Religion 37 7. Into the action arena: Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) actors, activities and outputs 39 7.1. Schools 39 7.1.1. Primary schools 39 7.1.2. Secondary schools 40 7.2. District level actors 41 7.2.1. General 41 7.2.2. Education-specific actors 44 7.3. Village level actors 45 7.3.1. Village Council, Village education committees, Village General Assembly 45 7.3.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Songea Municipal Profile 2010
    WI WJ NJ N WNJ WNM WNWWMNI WN NWNNNI MUNUCIPAL DIRECTOR SONGEA MU NICIPAL COUNCIL P.0, BOX 14 SONGEA. PHONE: + 225252602970 FAX: + 255252602474 Map No. 1: Songea Municip alitY S ONGTA TO'i{N TDMIMSTX.{TIIT AXIAS 2005 ill't tu 024 kilometers -r--l BONOEA WARDS I BOMBAhIBTLI I ltzraot'tr n lulAJENoo ! ri'nranlwr ! MATOGORo I MFARANYAKI ! lulsuFtNl N hILETELE I MSHANGANO ! Ruttnr,ttto ! RUVr..l[4A ! soNoEA_rulJtNl ! suBrRA sMe IilM Srtl@flE delolM Dtp{llsa @Ini*y of furir uri liw Srtiesrtr Delq@rd) Il{,{PNo.2 Source: Songeo Municipol Plonning Deporlment. STRUCTURE AND THE POLITICAL ORGANIZATION FULL COUNCIL Finance and Economic Affairs. Urban Planning, HIV/AID Administration Health and Education and Works Committee committee committee committee Ward Development Committee Mitaa Committee Adm inistrative O rga nization Stru ctu re VISION 'Aspires to have a community that enjoys sustainable high qaality standard of living' MISSION: 'Through collaboration with the internul und external stakeholders, intends to offer high quality and sustainable service to its community through the proper use of resources und through adherence to the priority set by involving its community in a transpurent und democratic manner which will eventually improve their standard of living by year 2020. Legalframework Songea is a Municipality within the Region of Ruvuma. The Songea Municipal appointed to be Municipality the year 2006. Lo c utio n and Top o grap hy Songea is one of the five Districts that make up Ruvuma Region. lt is the Regional Headquarter. lt lies between Longitude 35030'100 35'.The Municipality is bordered by the lringa Region to the Northern part, Songea District Council Southern part, Tunduru District Council Eastern part, and Mbinga District Council Western part, The Municipality is well linked by roads and other communication networks to the rest of the Region and other parts of the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Baseline Study Report Vol. 2 Table of Contents Items Pages 1. Introduction 1 1.1. Background 1 1.2. Study rationale and objective 4 2. Description of the study area 5 2.1. Location of the study areas 5 2.2. Institutional set-up 7 3. Literature review 8 3.1. Paradigm shift 8 4. Discussion of monitoring indicators 11 4.1. Identification 12 4.2. Measurement 13 5. Methodology 13 5.1. Data type and source 14 5.2. Primary data collection 14 5.2.1. Sampling methods 14 5.2.1.1. Data collection instruments 15 5.2.1.2. Key informants 16 5.3. Data analysis 17 5.3.1. Participatory rural appraisal (pra) 17 5.3.2. Structured surveyed 17 5.3.3. GIS data 17 6. Findings 17 6.1. Situation analysis 17 6.2. Level of development of wmas 21 6.3. Social aspects 22 6.3.1. Location and size: 22 6.3.2. Population 25 6.3.3. Natural resources: 30 6.3.4. Taboos and Rituals Related to Natural Resources Conservation 31 6.3.5. Village governments: 34 Wami-Mbiki WMA i Baseline Study Report Vol. 2 6.3.6. Village government office: 36 6.3.7. Existing community based organizations: 38 6.3.8. Knowledge of the wma concept: 40 6.3.9. Wildlife related court cases: 42 6.3.10. Collaboration with other stakeholders: 44 6.3.11. Social services 46 6.3.12. Community solidarity 52 6.4. Economic aspects 54 6.4..1. Economic services 54 6.4.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability of Health Benefits
    www.sciedu.ca/jha Journal of Hospital Administration 2015, Vol. 4, No. 4 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Sustainability of health benefits: Challenges faced by councils health management teams in sustaining comprehensive emergency care services after project phase out. The case of Rufiji, Kilombero and Ulanga districts Josephine Shabani ,∗ Iddagiovana Kinyonge, Hadija Kweka, Selemani Mbuyita, Ahmed Makemba, Godfrey Mbaruku Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania Received: January 13, 2015 Accepted: April 3, 2015 Online Published: April 28, 2015 DOI: 10.5430/jha.v4n4p1 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/jha.v4n4p1 ABSTRACT Background: Attention to the sustainability of health intervention programs is increasing not only in developing countries but also in developed countries together with international development agencies. However, consensus on operational definitions of sustainability and determinants of sustainability is still at an early stage. While much progress has been made in the development of successful interventions to promote health, too few interventions achieve long term sustainability. Implementation of EMPOWER project in collaboration with World Lung Foundation (WLF) have increased accessibility of comprehensive emergency obstetric care (CEmOC) by upgrading health centers which were formerly not providing CEmOC services in the three rural districts in Tanzania. Although the WHO standards of CEmOC coverage in the project districts was above the requirement, but accessing these health facilities which provides CEmOC was so difficult due to various factors like geographical (mountains, rivers, seasonal roads), locations of these health facilities (like in one district the it was located at a corner of the district), unreliable referral system and poor functionality of these health facilities especially in terms of emergency preparedness etc.
    [Show full text]
  • To Sell Or Not to Sell – Maasai Milk Marketing in Ngerengere, Tanzania
    African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics Volume 9 Number 2 pages 106-118 To sell or not to sell – Maasai milk marketing in Ngerengere, Tanzania Tim K Loos* University of Hohenheim (490a), Stuttgart, Germany E-mail: [email protected] Manfred Zeller University of Hohenheim (490a), Stuttgart, Germany. E-mail: [email protected] *Corresponding author Abstract In Maasai culture, responsibilities and labour are divided between the genders. Men are in charge of the herd and thus control the main income source. Women take care of the family and are responsible for milking. Milk sales provide the women’s main income source. In this paper, using olmarei- (= household) and enkaji- (= sub-household) data from the milk catchment area of a collection centre in Ngerengere, Tanzania, we assess the potential impact of milk sales on enkaji income. We estimate the effect by employing propensity score-matching procedures. Our findings suggest that milk sellers earn significantly higher average income per capita than non-sellers. This appears to be especially true for enkajijik selling milk to other buyers rather than to the collection centre. Other buyers reach more remote areas, usually offer higher prices, but only purchase limited amounts of milk. The collection centre, on the other hand, is a guaranteed market with large capacity. Keywords: milk sales; income effect; propensity score matching; Maasai; Tanzania 1. Introduction Livestock are one of the major agricultural sub-sectors in Tanzania. Its contribution to the national gross domestic product is estimated at 4.7%, of which about one third is attributed to the dairy sector (URT 2012).
    [Show full text]