DOCSLIB.ORG

Socio-Economic Baseline Survey of Villages Adjacent to the Vidunda Catchment Area, Bordering Udzungwa Mountains National Park

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Socio-Economic Baseline Survey of Villages Adjacent to the Vidunda Catchment Area, Bordering Udzungwa Mountains National Park Socio-Economic Baseline Survey of Villages Adjacent to the Vidunda Catchment Area, Bordering Udzungwa Mountains National Park Incorporating a Socio-Economic Monitoring Plan for 29 Villages North and East of the Udzungwa Mountains National Park Paul Harrison November 2006 WORLD WIDE FUND FOR NATURE TANZANIA PROGRAMME OFFICE (WWF-TPO) WITH SUPPORT FROM WWF NORWAY AND NORAD Socio-Economic Baseline Survey of Villages Adjacent to the Vidunda Catchment Area, Bordering Udzungwa Mountains National Park Report compiled by Paul Harrison, Kilimanyika Produced on behalf of WWF Tanzania Programme Office, P. O. Box 63117, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania Co-Financed by NORAD and WWF Norway All photographs © Kilimanyika, unless otherwise stated. A series of photographs accompanying this report may be obtained by contacting Kilimanyika The views expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect those of WWF Tanzania, WWF Norway or NORAD. Bankipore House High Street Brill, Bucks HP18 9ST, UK Tel. +44 7739 803 704 Email: [email protected] Web: www.kilimanyika.com 2 Paul Harrison/Kilimanyika for WWF Tanzania Table of Contents Tables and Figures..............................................................................................................................................4 Abbreviations and Acronyms .............................................................................................................................5 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................................6 Executive Summary............................................................................................................................................7 1 Background .........................................................................................................................................7 2 Key Findings .......................................................................................................................................7 3 Monitoring Steps .................................................................................................................................8 Scope of Study....................................................................................................................................................9 1 Importance of the Study ......................................................................................................................9 2 Background to the Study .....................................................................................................................9 3 Objective of the Study .......................................................................................................................10 4 Structure and Method of the Study....................................................................................................10 Context & Literature Review............................................................................................................................12 1 Geographical Context........................................................................................................................12 2 List and Population of Study Villages ...............................................................................................13 3 Previous Socio-Economic Research..................................................................................................14 4 Participatory Forest Management (PFM) ..........................................................................................15 Report on Vidunda Villages .............................................................................................................................16 1 Villages Profiled................................................................................................................................16 2 Household Survey .............................................................................................................................16 3 Land and Home Ownership...............................................................................................................17 4 Standards of Living ...........................................................................................................................18 5 Available Assets ................................................................................................................................21 6 Use of and Dependence on Natural Assets........................................................................................25 7 Values of the Forest...........................................................................................................................28 8 Livelihood Activities .........................................................................................................................28 9 Seasonal Activities ............................................................................................................................30 10 Vulnerability and Shocks...................................................................................................................31 11 Land Use Planning ............................................................................................................................31 12 Influential Institutions........................................................................................................................32 13 Alternative Livelihood Programmes..................................................................................................34 14 Level of Environmental Awareness...................................................................................................34 Findings from Stakeholder Consultations.........................................................................................................36 1 Government Natural Resource Managers..........................................................................................36 2 Commercial Stakeholders..................................................................................................................39 Socio-Economic Monitoring Plan ....................................................................................................................41 1 Overview ...........................................................................................................................................41 2 Background .......................................................................................................................................41 3 Ten Key Steps....................................................................................................................................42 Discussion & Recommendations......................................................................................................................48 1 Monitoring the Future........................................................................................................................48 2 Summarising Livelihood Activities...................................................................................................48 3 Capacity Building and Institutional Change......................................................................................48 4 High Dependency on Natural Resources...........................................................................................48 5 Environmental Awareness.................................................................................................................49 6 Energy Options..................................................................................................................................49 7 Market Realities.................................................................................................................................50 References ........................................................................................................................................................51 Appendix 1. Methodology................................................................................................................................53 1 Criteria...............................................................................................................................................53 2 Socio-Economic Baseline Study & Livelihoods Assessment............................................................53 3 Rapid Rural Appraisal .......................................................................................................................54 4 Stakeholder Consultations .................................................................................................................55 Appendix 2: Communities & Stakeholders Consulted .....................................................................................56 1 Stakeholders ......................................................................................................................................56 2 Community Members........................................................................................................................56 Appendix 3: Quantitative Questionnaire ..........................................................................................................60 Appendix 4: Livelihood Assessment Checklist ................................................................................................64
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kilombero Valley, United Republic of Tanzania
    Kilombero Valley, United Republic of Tanzania Ramsar Site No. 1173 Ramsar Advisory Mission Report April 2017 Ed Wilson, Robert McInnes, Damas Patrick Mbaga and Paul Ouedraogo i [Page left blank for double-sided printing] ii Contents 1. Background ................................................................................................................ 1 1.1. Overview of the wetlands of Tanzania.............................................................. 1 1.2. Kilombero Valley Ramsar Site: Ecological character description ...................... 2 1.3. Background to the Ramsar Advisory Mission ................................................... 5 1.4. Importance of the RAM recommendations ....................................................... 7 2. Hydrological and wider context of the Kilombero Valley Ramsar Site .................. 8 2.1. Background ..................................................................................................... 8 2.2. The Rufiji River basin ....................................................................................... 9 2.3. Hydrology of the Rufiji River basin ................................................................. 10 2.4. Management of water in the Rufiji River Basin ............................................... 10 2.5. The Kilombero River sub-basin ...................................................................... 13 2.6. Governance structures in the Kilombero River sub-basin ............................... 15 2.7. Economic activities .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability of Health Benefits
    www.sciedu.ca/jha Journal of Hospital Administration 2015, Vol. 4, No. 4 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Sustainability of health benefits: Challenges faced by councils health management teams in sustaining comprehensive emergency care services after project phase out. The case of Rufiji, Kilombero and Ulanga districts Josephine Shabani ,∗ Iddagiovana Kinyonge, Hadija Kweka, Selemani Mbuyita, Ahmed Makemba, Godfrey Mbaruku Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania Received: January 13, 2015 Accepted: April 3, 2015 Online Published: April 28, 2015 DOI: 10.5430/jha.v4n4p1 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/jha.v4n4p1 ABSTRACT Background: Attention to the sustainability of health intervention programs is increasing not only in developing countries but also in developed countries together with international development agencies. However, consensus on operational definitions of sustainability and determinants of sustainability is still at an early stage. While much progress has been made in the development of successful interventions to promote health, too few interventions achieve long term sustainability. Implementation of EMPOWER project in collaboration with World Lung Foundation (WLF) have increased accessibility of comprehensive emergency obstetric care (CEmOC) by upgrading health centers which were formerly not providing CEmOC services in the three rural districts in Tanzania. Although the WHO standards of CEmOC coverage in the project districts was above the requirement, but accessing these health facilities which provides CEmOC was so difficult due to various factors like geographical (mountains, rivers, seasonal roads), locations of these health facilities (like in one district the it was located at a corner of the district), unreliable referral system and poor functionality of these health facilities especially in terms of emergency preparedness etc.
    [Show full text]
  • A Contextual Analysis for Village Land Use Planning in Tanzania's
    A contextual analysis for village land use planning in Tanzania’s Bagamoyo and Chalinze districts, Pwani region and Mvomero and Kilosa districts, Morogoro region Sustainable Rangeland Management Project ILRI PROJECT REPORT ISBN: 92-9146-586-0 The International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) works to improve food and nutritional security and reduce poverty in developing countries through research for efficient, safe and sustainable use of livestock. Co-hosted by Kenya and Ethiopia, it has regional or country offices and projects in East, South and Southeast Asia as well as Central, East, Southern and West Africa. ilri.org CGIAR is a global agricultural research partnership for a food-secure future. Its research is carried out by 15 research centres in collaboration with hundreds of partner organizations. cgiar.org A contextual analysis for village land use planning in Pwani and Morogoro regions of Tanzania i ii A contextual analysis for village land use planning in Pwani and Morogoro regions of Tanzania A contextual analysis for village land use planning in Tanzania’s Bagamoyo and Chalinze districts, Pwani region and Mvomero and Kilosa districts, Morogoro region Sustainable Rangeland Management Project Emmanuel Sulle and Wilbard Mkama Editor: Fiona Flintan (International Livestock Research Institute) July 2019 A contextual analysis for village land use planning in Pwani and Morogoro regions of Tanzania iii ©2019 International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) ILRI thanks all donors and organizations which globally support its work through their contributions to the CGIAR Trust Fund This publication is copyrighted by the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI). It is licensed for use under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence.
    [Show full text]
  • Africa's Freedom Railway
    AFRICA HistORY Monson TRANSPOrtatiON How a Chinese JamiE MONSON is Professor of History at Africa’s “An extremely nuanced and Carleton College. She is editor of Women as On a hot afternoon in the Development Project textured history of negotiated in- Food Producers in Developing Countries and Freedom terests that includes international The Maji Maji War: National History and Local early 1970s, a historic Changed Lives and Memory. She is a past president of the Tanzania A masterful encounter took place near stakeholders, local actors, and— Studies Assocation. the town of Chimala in Livelihoods in Tanzania Railway importantly—early Chinese poli- cies of development assistance.” the southern highlands of history of the Africa —James McCann, Boston University Tanzania. A team of Chinese railway workers and their construction “Blessedly economical and Tanzanian counterparts came unpretentious . no one else and impact of face-to-face with a rival is capable of writing about this team of American-led road region with such nuance.” rail power in workers advancing across ’ —James Giblin, University of Iowa the same rural landscape. s Africa The Americans were building The TAZARA (Tanzania Zambia Railway Author- Freedom ity) or Freedom Railway stretches from Dar es a paved highway from Dar Salaam on the Tanzanian coast to the copper es Salaam to Zambia, in belt region of Zambia. The railway, built during direct competition with the the height of the Cold War, was intended to redirect the mineral wealth of the interior away Chinese railway project. The from routes through South Africa and Rhodesia. path of the railway and the After being rebuffed by Western donors, newly path of the roadway came independent Tanzania and Zambia accepted help from communist China to construct what would together at this point, and become one of Africa’s most vital transportation a tense standoff reportedly corridors.
    [Show full text]
  • Kilombero Plantations Limited
    KILOMBERO PLANTATIONS LIMITED MNGETA FARM SQUATTER SURVEY REPORT Claude G. Mung’ong’o, PhD and Juma Kayonko, MSc Natural Resource Management Consultants P.O. Box 35097, Dar es Salaam FEBRUARY 2009 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION Background Located in Mngeta Division, Kilombero District, Mngeta Farm (5,818 ha) is owned by Kilombero Plantations Ltd (KPL), a public-private partnership between the Rufiji Basin Development Authority (RUBADA) and InfEnergy Tanzania Ltd. In 1986, the Government of Tanzania granted the farm area to the Korea Tanzania Agricultural Company (KOTACO), a Korea – Tanzania government partnership. KOTACO surveyed the farm, cleared the entire 5818 ha, and built 185 km of roads and approximately 290 km of drainage ditches. KOTACO farmed rice on approximately 2500 ha until 1993 when the Koreans left the project and handed over the farm equipment and infrastructure to RUBADA. From 1994 to 1999 the farm remained idle. Later in 1999 RUBADA contracted the farm to Kilombero Holding Company (KIHOCO) which never farmed more than 400 ha. KIHOCO fell 5 years behind in rent payments and was finally forced off the farm in August 2007. During the period of the farm’s idleness it attracted a gradual influx of subsistence squatters from different parts of Tanzania. It also attracted a high influx of livestock, especially from 2005 onwards. In December 2007, KPL began operations, re-clearing land and planting 641 ha of rice in early 2008. In September 2008 KPL completed the title transfer of Mngeta Farm. KPL is planting 3000 ha of rice in early 2009 and has targeted 5800 ha of rice in 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Sugarcane Outgrowers in Kilombero District, Tanzania
    Working Paper Working The role of the state and foreign capital in agricultural commercialisation: The case of sugarcane outgrowers in Kilombero District, Tanzania Rebecca Smalley, Emmanuel Sulle and Lameck Malale September 2014 Working Paper 106 www.future-agricultures.org Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank Ruth Hall for her comments on a previous draft, Ellen Sprenger for sending us her report and all the people who contributed their time to this research, including company staff, grower representatives, civil servants, researchers and local residents. Working Paper 106 2 www.future-agricultures.org 1 Introduction Our main research question is: what effect has privatisation of Kilombero Sugar Company had on its Since the launch of the Kilimo Kwanza (‘Agriculture operations and surrounding communities? The study was First’) slogan in 2009, the Tanzanian government has undertaken within the context of the Future Agricultures been part of efforts to inject foreign capital into its Consortium (FAC) and our analytical framework draws 1 country’s agricultural sector. A range of domestic and from its Land theme, especially its questions around international players have developed plans to facilitate agrarian structure; social differentiation; land and private acquisition of farmland; increase investment in property; and livelihoods and food security. The paper irrigation and value addition; deepen the penetration contributes to the debate on large-scale land acquisition of agribusiness; and bring more of Tanzania’s small- and agricultural commercialisation in sub-Saharan Africa, scale farmers into commercial agriculture, particularly as well as providing insights for Tanzanian agricultural through outgrower arrangements. The plans include the policymaking and giving a history of the company and Southern Agricultural Growth Corridor project (SAGCOT), local area.
    [Show full text]
  • Occasional Paper 272 Occasional Paper
    POWER AND THE PRIVATE SECTOR IN TANZANIA: PROSPECTS FOR THE AFDB’s HIGH FIVES STRATEGY CYRIL PRINSLOO & TALITHA BERTELSMANN-SCOTT OCCASIONAL PAPER 272 OCCASIONAL PAPER NOVEMBER 2017 SOUTH AFRICAN INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS The South African Institute of International Affairs (SAIIA) has a long and proud record as South Africa’s premier research institute on international issues. It is an independent, non-government think tank whose key strategic objectives are to make effective input into public policy, and to encourage wider and more informed debate on international affairs, with particular emphasis on African issues and concerns. It is both a centre for research excellence and a home for stimulating public engagement. SAIIA’s occasional papers present topical, incisive analyses, offering a variety of perspectives on key policy issues in Africa and beyond. Core public policy research themes covered by SAIIA include good governance and democracy; economic policymaking; international security and peace; and new global challenges such as food security, global governance reform and the environment. Please consult our website www.saiia.org.za for further information about SAIIA’s work. ECONOMIC DIPLOMACY PROGRAMME SAIIA’s Economic Diplomacy (EDIP) Programme focuses on the position of Africa in the global economy, primarily at regional, but also at continental and multilateral levels. Trade and investment policies are critical for addressing the development challenges of Africa and achieving sustainable economic growth for the region. EDIP’s work is broadly divided into three streams. (1) Research on global economic governance in order to understand the broader impact on the region and identifying options for Africa in its participation in the international financial system.
    [Show full text]
  • Infrastructure Development AED2018.Pdf
    INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT IN TANZANIA PROF JOSEPH MSAMBICHAKA MBEYA UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 50TH YEARS ERB ANNIVERSARY 5TH TO 7TH SEPTEMBER 2018 PRESENTATION LAYOUT 1. DEFINITION OF INFRASTRUCTURE 2. SOME MAJOR INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS IN AFRICA IN THE 21ST CENTURY 3. SOME INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS IN TANZANIA 4. INFRASTRUCTURE GROWTH IN TANZANIA 5. CONTRIBUTION 6. FINANCING 7. CONCLUDING REMARKS INFRASTRUCTURE DEFINITION Infrastructure are the fundamental facilities and systems which include organizational structures, services and physical structures (e.g. buildings, roads, power supplies) serving a country, city, or a place necessary for its economy to function, economic develop and prosperity. INFRASTRUCTURE … CONT’D CLASSIFICATIONS: Hard Infrastructure Infrastructure Soft Infrastructure HARD STRUCTURE Hard Infrastructure Include:- Roads, Bridges, Railways, Buildings, Bridges, Irrigation Structures and Water supply systems. SOFT STRUCTURE Soft Infrastructure Services and system e.g. Educational, Health, Legal, Courier, Financial, Security, Political Systems, Management Systems, Governance, Regulations, Standards, Policies, Procedures, Guidelines etc. INFRASTRUCTURE … CONT’D OTHER CLASSIFICATIONS INCLUDE : • SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE: PARKS, CHILDREN PLAYGROUNDS, HOSPITALS, SPORTS AREA, ETC. • ECONOMIC INFRASTRUCTURE: DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS, FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS AND MARKETS, ETC. • MILITARY INFRASTRUCTURE: BARRACKS, AIRFIELDS, ETC. • COMMUNICATIONS INFRASTRUCTURE: POLITICAL NETWORKS, SOCIAL NETWORKS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY,
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the State of Pastoralists' Human Rights in Tanzania
    REPORT ON THE STATE OF PASTORALISTS’ HUMAN RIGHTS IN TANZANIA: SURVEY OF TEN DISTRICTS OF TANZANIA MAINLAND 2010/2011 [Area Surveyed: Handeni, Kilindi, Bagamoyo, Kibaha, Iringa-Rural, Morogoro, Mvomero, Kilosa, Mbarali and Kiteto Districts] Cover Picture: Maasai warriors dancing at the initiation ceremony of Mr. Kipulelia Kadege’s children in Handeni District, Tanga Region, April 2006. PAICODEO Tanzania Funded By: IWGIA, Denmark 1 REPORT ON THE STATE OF PASTORALISTS’ HUMAN RIGHTS IN TANZANIA: SURVEY OF TEN DISTRICTS OF TANZANIA MAINLAND 2010/2011 [Area Surveyed: Handeni, Kilindi, Bagamoyo, Kibaha, Iringa-Rural, Morogoro-Rural, Mvomero, Kilosa, Mbarali and Kiteto Districts] PARAKUIYO PASTORALISTS INDIGENOUS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION-(PAICODEO) Funded By: IWGIA, Denmark i REPORT ON THE STATE OF PASTORALISTS’ RIGHTS IN TANZANIA: SURVEY OF TEN DISTRICTS OF TANZANIA MAINLAND 2010/2011 Researchers Legal and Development Consultants Limited (LEDECO Advocates) Writer Adv. Clarence KIPOBOTA (Advocate of the High Court) Publisher Parakuiyo Pastoralists Indigenous Community Development Organization © PAICODEO March, 2013 ISBN: 978-9987-9726-1-6 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..................................................................................................... vii FOREWORD ........................................................................................................................viii Legal Status and Objectives of PAICODEO ...........................................................viii Vision ......................................................................................................................viii
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Information Needs of Rice Farmers in Tanzania
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal) Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln Spring 1-22-2014 Assessment of information needs of rice farmers in Tanzania; A case study of Kilombero District, Morogoro ronald benard SOKOINE UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE, [email protected] Frankwell Dulle Sokoine University of Agriculture, [email protected] Honesta Ngalapa Sokoine University of Agriculture, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac Part of the Library and Information Science Commons benard, ronald; Dulle, Frankwell; and Ngalapa, Honesta, "Assessment of information needs of rice farmers in Tanzania; A case study of Kilombero District, Morogoro" (2014). Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 1071. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1071 1 ASSESSMENT OF THE INFORMATION NEEDS OF RICE FARMERS IN TANZANIA: A CASE STUDY OF KILOMBERO DISTRICT, MOROGORO. Benard Ronald Sokoine University of Agriculture, Tanzania, [email protected] Frankwell Dulle Sokoine University of Agriculture, Tanzania University of South Africa, South Africa, [email protected] Ngalapa Honesta Sokoine University of Agriculture, Tanzania, [email protected] Abstract This paper aims at assessing the information needs of rice farmers in Tanzania using rice producers in Kilombero District as a case study. The study was carried out in four purposefully selected villages in Kilombero District, Morogoro Region. The study used a sample size of 80 respondents. The study employed a case study research design and used a combination of methods to collect both quantitative and qualitative data. Data were collected by using documentary review, questionnaires, focus group discussions and personal observations.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Publication
    BRIEFING NOTE March 2015 ETHNIC VIOLENCE IN MOROGORO REGION IN TANZANIA n early 2015, Morogoro Region of Tanzania was the scene of deadly violence targeting minority Maasai and Datoga pasto- Iralist groups,1 which raised concerns in Parliament that the assaults could descend into ethnic based violence and spread across the country2. These assaults are said to be instigated by public figures with interests in acquiring land3. State authori- ties have not intervened to protect Maasai and Datoga citizens; rather police protection has been provided to others who are illegally cultivating officially registered Maasai village land. The violent episodes experienced since mid-January 2015 follow on from a decade of poor governance in Morogoro Region, with illegal eviction and dispossession of Maasai and Datoga citizens accompanied by human rights violations. None of these offences have been addressed despite high court rulings and numerous commissions of enquiry4. This brief provides a review of the violent and often deadly attacks on Maasai and Datoga citizens in Morogoro Region, committed between 15 January and the end of February 2015 as well as recommendations to duty bearers and other stakeholders. The brief is informed by civil society organisations5, official records of the Tanzanian Parliament and the media, and reference will be made where possible6. Since January 15, assaults have led to between 6 and 15 deaths (numbers still to be confirmed7) and many people have been injured and robbed. Six Maasai women were raped, 38 Maasai homesteads on village land were burned to the ground and 77 cattle were stolen. Currently 266 men, women and children are living in Mabwegere Village (Kilosa District of Morogoro Region) without food, shelter or protection.
    [Show full text]
  • Longitudinal Study on the Health Status of Children in Kikwawila Village, Tanzania : Study Area and Design
    Longitudinal study on the health status of children in Kikwawila village, Tanzania : study area and design Autor(en): Tanner, M. / Degrémont, A. / Savigny, D. de Objekttyp: Article Zeitschrift: Acta Tropica Band (Jahr): 44 (1987) Heft 2: A longitudinal study in a rural Tanzanian community 1982-1984 PDF erstellt am: 05.10.2021 Persistenter Link: http://doi.org/10.5169/seals-313827 Nutzungsbedingungen Die ETH-Bibliothek ist Anbieterin der digitalisierten Zeitschriften. Sie besitzt keine Urheberrechte an den Inhalten der Zeitschriften. Die Rechte liegen in der Regel bei den Herausgebern. Die auf der Plattform e-periodica veröffentlichten Dokumente stehen für nicht-kommerzielle Zwecke in Lehre und Forschung sowie für die private Nutzung frei zur Verfügung. Einzelne Dateien oder Ausdrucke aus diesem Angebot können zusammen mit diesen Nutzungsbedingungen und den korrekten Herkunftsbezeichnungen weitergegeben werden. Das Veröffentlichen von Bildern in Print- und Online-Publikationen ist nur mit vorheriger Genehmigung der Rechteinhaber erlaubt. Die systematische Speicherung von Teilen des elektronischen Angebots auf anderen Servern bedarf ebenfalls des schriftlichen Einverständnisses der Rechteinhaber. Haftungsausschluss Alle Angaben erfolgen ohne Gewähr für Vollständigkeit oder Richtigkeit. Es wird keine Haftung übernommen für Schäden durch die Verwendung von Informationen aus diesem Online-Angebot oder durch das Fehlen von Informationen. Dies gilt auch für Inhalte Dritter, die über dieses Angebot zugänglich sind. Ein Dienst der ETH-Bibliothek ETH Zürich, Rämistrasse 101, 8092 Zürich, Schweiz, www.library.ethz.ch http://www.e-periodica.ch Acta Tropica 44. 119-136(1987) 1 Swiss Tropical Institute Field Laboratory, Ifakara, Tanzania 2 Swiss Tropical Institute Basel, Switzerland 1 District Health Office, Kilombero District, Tanzania Longitudinal study on the health status of children in Kikwawila village, Tanzania: study area and design M.
    [Show full text]