DOCSLIB.ORG

Paulovicova Nina Spring 2012

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Paulovicova Nina Spring 2012 University of Alberta Rescue of Jews in the Slovak State (1939 – 1945) by Nina Paulovicova A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Department of History and Classics ©Nina Paulovicova Spring 2012 Edmonton, Alberta Permission is hereby granted to the University of Alberta Libraries to reproduce single copies of this thesis and to lend or sell such copies for private, scholarly or scientific research purposes only. Where the thesis is converted to, or otherwise made available in digital form, the University of Alberta will advise potential users of the thesis of these terms. The author reserves all other publication and other rights in association with the copyright in the thesis and, except as herein before provided, neither the thesis nor any substantial portion thereof may be printed or otherwise reproduced in any material form whatsoever without the author's prior written permission. Abstract This dissertation targets the topic of rescue of Jews in the Holocaust in World War II. It offers a thorough examination of the defiance mechanics of rescue and looks at how precisely rescuers undermine the pillars of totalitarian regimes. The locus for the empirical part is the Slovak State, a puppet state of Nazi Germany. This dissertation scrutinizes the mindset behind efforts to assist Jews, the obstacles on paths to rescue as well as strategies applied in order to overcome legal and societal persecution of Jews. This project builds on the premise that agencies of any individual fluctuate, merge and change accordingly with the developments of the war. This study also undermines the widely accepted view of the rescue of Jews as static and one-dimensional and highlights rescue acts’ heterogeneous and amorphous nature. Weaving the shades of compliance of Slovaks with the clerico-fascist regime into the story of the assistance/non- assistance to Jews aims to produce a “collage of multiple ambiguities” and “grey zones” of rescue. Rather than celebrating acts of rescuers, this dissertation focuses on the path to rescue of which the acts of rescuers were just one piece in a long chain of events in wartime Slovakia. What are the silenced facets of the rescue of Jews that have not been acknowledged, and why have they not been? Why did the topic of rescue emerge as a prominent theme in public forums in recent years? This dissertation not only looks at rescue more broadly, engaging with models of defiance of totalitarian states, but also sheds light on the controversy over the understanding of the Slovak World War II milieu. Acknowledgements My journey from a problematic postcommunist milieu to Canada was not only a journey to greater economic opportunities in North America, but more important, a journey of intellectual enlightenment. I am sincerely thankful to my supervisor, Professor John-Paul Himka, a prominent scholar of the Ukrainian Holocaust, whose guidance throughout my studies has enabled me to develop a deeper understanding of Holocaust history. I benefited from his courses on the Holocaust as well as the University of Alberta Holocaust and Memory workshop that he initiated. Perhaps most important, Professor Himka turned my attention to avenues of investigation previously unknown to me. In short, I would never have been able to finish my dissertation without intellectual direction from such a knowledgeable scholar and the general support of such a wonderful person. In addition, I am grateful to my advisory committee. Professor Dennis Sweeney’s outstanding course on Nazi Germany allowed me to set forth the history of the clerico-fascist Slovak state within a broader perspective. Professor Beverly Lemire opened my mind to the fascinating topic of gender, which was terra incognita in the Central European postcommunist era. Professor Guy Thompson’s course on material culture – the first course I ever took on American soil – provided a sobering view of methodology in history. I would also like to thank a number of other people whose support gave me much needed energy to overcome the often sad, tragic and depressing nature of the topic in question. Holocaust survivor Pavol Hronec, who unfortunately passed away this year, encouraged me in my work during times of personal tragedy; I dedicate this work to the memory of this exceptional person. I am thankful to the director of Hlohovec Museum, Jozef Urminský, who not only facilitated contact with Pavol Hronec in Jerusalem but also pointed out useful material. I owe much to Professor Eduard Niž ňanský at Comenius University in Bratislava, Slovakia: besides his outstanding work on the Holocaust in Slovakia, to which I am indebted, he became a great friend, helping me establish academic relations with Holocaust scholars in Slovakia such as Ivan Kamenec, Martina Fiamová and Martin Macko while offering advice and support without which I would not have been able to overcome obstacles I faced along the way. I offer my regards and blessings to all who supported me during the completion of the project. I am greatly indebted to dear friends and colleagues Sarah Waurechen, Sean Atkins, Rob Desjardins and Tanya Henderson. Sarah’s informal breakfast club at Good Earth alleviated the pressures I was exposed to during my studies and brought more light and humour to my life. Per Anders Rudling, Srdja Pavlovic, Heather Coleman, Marya Melentyeva, Bryan Gold, Kamila Štulerová, David Buchanan, Igor Jakab and Alan Rutkowski assisted me or contributed to my work in various ways. I am thankful to the people outside academia who supported me in difficult times. I would not be able to withstand the pressures of emigration, academic life and motherhood without the support of my mother, Mária Paulovi čová, as well as my husband Martin Ková č, Stanislava Stan čeková, Jana Rychlikova, Henrich Rychlik, Denisa Larišová, Ingrid Pagá čová, Katarína Psicová, Miloš Rácik, Ivana Gergi čová, Miroslav Tomašovi č, Martin Štipák and Rišo Stolárik. The attitude of staff members at various archives in Slovakia made a huge difference, helping me to overcome challenges that arose during the completion of this project. Despite the cold reception and unaccommodating assistance offered at the Slovak National Archive, I was lucky to come across enthusiastic and supportive staff in the State District Archive in Trnava, the Regional Archive in Bratislava and Nadácia Milana Šime čku. I have benefited from a number of awards and scholarships that helped me to conduct research in Slovak archives and complete this study, including: a Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada Doctoral Fellowship, the Andrew Stuart Memorial Graduate Prize, the Queen Elizabeth Graduate Scholarship, the David Marples Travel Award, Stipendium Gizely Fleischmanovej and Štipendium Park Uš ľachtilých Duší. Portions of the introduction to this dissertation are forthcoming in Bringing the Dark Past to Light: The Reception of the Holocaust in Postcommunist Europe , edited by John- Paul Himka and Joanna B. Michlic (University of Nebraska Press). A very short section of Chapter 2 was translated from my previous work Židovská komunita v dejinách mesta Hlohovec. (1938 – 1945) Príbeh, ktorý prešiel tmou published in 2009. Table of Contents Introduction Chapter I, From Marginalization to Mythologization: Mapping the Rescue Discourses in Postwar and Postcommunist Slovakia / 1. Chapter II, “The Grey Zone of Assistance to Jews.” On the Path to the Rescue of Jewish Doctors / 48. Chapter III, “Undisciplined Aryanizers.” Mapping the Terrain of Assistance to Jews within the Context of Aryanization Policies / 111. Chapter IV, The Silenced Phenomenon of Cross-National Rescue: “Leaking Border” and Paid Smugglers / 176. Chapter V, “On the Path to the Cross.” Baptism as a Means of Rescuing Jews from Deportations in 1942 / 245. Conclusion / 307. Bibliography / 315. List of Figures Figure 1, 1 March 1943 - Religion of 18,945 ethnic Jews Figure 2, An insight into the denominations of 8002 baptized Jews not concentrated in labour camps dated from 1 March 1943. Figure 3, More detailed look at Figure 2. An insight into the denominations of 2,568 Jews baptized prior 14 March 1939. Figure 4, An insight into the denominations of 5,434 Jews baptized between 14 March 1939 and 1 March 1943. Table 1, Number of Jews in Slovakia on 1 March 1943 (after the 1942 deportation) Introduction On 25 October 1996 I was invited to a tiny one bedroom apartment on Vinohradská Street in Hlohovec, a small town situated in Southwestern Slovakia. As I reached for the doorbell I realized that the apartment doors were open. The calm voice of Rabbi William Glück encouraged me to step inside. Rabbi Glück apologized for his unusual welcome and explained that on Saturdays his actions were restricted by the need to respect the Sabbath and avoid any activity that might be considered “work.” He kept his door opened so that his nieghbours could hear him if he called for assistance. The purpose of our meeting was to discuss a taboo theme – the fate of the Jewish community in Hlohovec in World War II. Despite his age, Rabbi Glück’s mind was extremely sharp. We discussed his father’s effort to alert the Slovak president Jozef Tiso about the fate of the deported in an unanswered letter. We also discussed the fate of many Hlohovec Jews and the Rabbi’s own painful experience in Auschwitz in 1944 – 1945. When I asked him how he managed to survive, Rabbi Glück replied that his survival was God’s will. Somewhat puzzled by the Rabbi’s answer I personally believed that it was this very tiny man’s spiritual strength that helped him to endure his suffering. It was this discussion that piqued my curiosity about exactly how some survived the Holocaust when so many others perished.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 20. ABBILDUNGEN UND KARTEN 1978 Abbildungen Und Karten
    20. ABBILDUNGEN UND KARTEN 1978 Abbildungen und Karten Abb. 1: Festzug zum 60. Regierungsjubiläum des Kaisers und Königs Franz Joseph I., Wien, 12. Juni 1908: Franz Joseph mit Kaiser Wilhelm II. Abb. 2: Abfahrt eines österreichisch-ungarischen Regiments an die Front, Anfang August 1914 Abbildungen und Karten 1979 Abb. 3: Mobilmachung in Belgrad/Beograd, Anfang August 1914 Abb. 4: Österreichisch-ungarische Truppen nehmen eine serbische MG-Kompanie gefangen, Herbst 1915 1980 Abbildungen und Karten Abb. 5: Im eroberten Serbien: Deutsch-österreichisch-ungarisch-bulgarische Verbrüderung, Herbst 1915 Abb. 6: Serbien unter k.u.k. Militärverwaltung: Serbische Bauern bringen Heu zu einer Sammel- stelle Abbildungen und Karten 1981 Abb. 7: Umsturz in Prag/Praha, 28. Oktober 1918: Menschenmenge vor dem Wenzels-Denkmal Abb. 8: Die Proklamation der Unabhängigkeit des Staates der Slowenen, Kroaten und Serben vom Balkon des Saborgebäudes in Agram/Zagreb, 29. Oktober 1918 1982 Abbildungen und Karten Abb. 9: Adresse des Vizepräsidenten des Nationalrates SHS, Ante Pavelić, an den Prinzregenten Aleksandar, Belgrad/Beograd, 1. Dezember 1918 Abb. 10: Der tschechoslowakische Präsident Tomáš G. Masaryk wird auf dem Wenzelsplatz in Prag/ Praha von der Bevölkerung und Legionären willkommen geheißen, 21. Dezember 1918 Abbildungen und Karten 1983 Abb. 11: Leichenbegängnis für die am 27. Jänner 1919 in Marburg/Maribor von slowenischen Truppen erschossenen deutschen Demonstranten Abb. 12: Défilé des tschechoslowakischen Heeres in Pressburg/Bratislava, 4.-5. Februar 1919 1984 Abbildungen und Karten Abb. 13: Die Hauptvertreter der alliierten Mächte auf der Pariser Friedenskonferenz, Frühjahr 1919: v. li. David Lloyd George, Vittorio Emanuele Orlando, Georges Clemenceau, Woodrow Wilson Abb. 14: Der österreichische Staatskanzler Karl Renner unterzeichnet in Saint-Germain-en-Laye den Friedensvertrag, 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Slovakia's Righteous Among the Nations
    Slovakia’s Righteous among the Nations Gila Fatran Slovak-Jewish relations, an important factor in the rescue of Jews during the Holocaust, were influenced in no small part by events that took place in the latter third of the 19th century. That century saw the national awakening of oppressed nations. The Slovak nation, ruled by the Hungarians for 1,000 years, was struggling at the time for its national existence. The creation of the Austro-Hungarian monarchy led in 1867 to the granting of equal civil rights to the Jews in the empire in the assumption that they would assimilate nationally and culturally into the state. At the same time the Hungarian leaders stepped up their suppression of the Slovak nation. The integration of the Jews into the developing economic and cultural life and the continued improvement in their situation alongside the suppression of the aspirations of the Slovaks, were used by the political and church representatives of the Slovak nation to fan the flames of Jew-hatred and to blame the Jews for the difficult lot of the Slovak People. During this period many Slovak publications also addressed the existence of a “Jewish Question” in a negative sense: blaming the Jews for all of the Slovak society’s ills. During this era, one of the central reasons behind the rise of Slovak antisemitism was the economic factor. At the same time, the slogan “Svoj k svojmu,” which, freely translated, means “Buy only from your own people,” registered a series of “successes” in neighboring countries. However, when nationalists, using this motto, launched a campaign to persuade Slovaks to boycott Jewish-owned shops, their efforts proved unsuccessful.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Community Museum As a Result of Citizen Activities
    4 63 • 2015 ESSAY JEWISH COMMUNITY MUSEUM AS A RESULT OF CITIZEN ACTIVITIES PETER SALNER PhDr. Peter Salner, DrSc., Institute of Ethnology of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Klemensova 19, 813 64, e-mail: [email protected] The study focuses on circumstances under which the Jewish Community Museum was established and officially opened in the Bratislava synagogue in 2012. Already prior to WWII, a respected architect and collector Eugen Barkány came with the idea of opening a museum consisting of Slovak judaica. He followed up his project after the liberation, too. In the second half of the sixties, it seemed that thanks to the Jewish Religious Community (JCR/ŽNO) Bratislava support there would be created a Slovak branch of the Prague Jewish Museum within the premises of the Neolog Bratislava synagogue. However, the project implementation had to be postponed for many years to come: first of all due to Bárkány’s death (1967), demolition of the sy - nagogue giving place to the construction of a new bridge, and the occupation of Czechoslovakia in 1968. In the beginning of the next millenium, it was Maroš Borský, Art historian and Judaist , who undertook this project. He persuaded the board members of the JCR (ŽNO) Bra - tislava to vacate the already abandoned female gallery of the only preserved synagogue for presentation of Barkány’s collection. Apart from the permanent exhibition, the museum already offered three exhibits entitled: The Shadow of the Past (2013); We Are Here (2014); and Engerau – a Forgotten Story of Petržalka in 2015. Key words: The Jewish Community Museum, E.
    [Show full text]
  • Bojničky 2016 - 2024  Štruktúra - Úvod Analytická Časť Strategická Časť Programová Časť Realizačná Časť Finančná Časť Záver Prílohy
    Program hospodárskeho a sociálneho rozvoja obce Bojničky 2016 – 2024 Názov Program hospodárskeho a sociálneho rozvoja obce Bojničky Územné vymedzenie: Trnavský samosprávny kraj Okres: Hlohovec Obec: Bojničky Región: ZMO - Jaslovské Bohunice, Dolné Považie Nadmorská výška: 193 m n. m Počet obyvateľov: 1 384 Rozloha 927 ha Hustota obyvateľstva 147,68 obyv./km² Územný plán obce schválený xxx Dátum schválenia PHSR 05. 09. 2016 Dátum platnosti PHSR Od 01. 10. 2016 do 31. 12. 2024 Verzia 1.0 Publikovaný verejne 09. 09. 2016 Obsah Úvod 1. Zámer spracovania PHSR 2. Harmonogram spracovania PHSR 3. Východiskové koncepčné dokumenty 4. Analytická časť 4.1 Analýza vnútorného prostredia 4.1.1 História obce 4.1.2 Geografické hľadisko 4.1.3 Prírodné zdroje 4.1.4 Demografické zdroje 4.1.6 Sociálna infraštruktúra 4.1.7 Kultúrny a spoločenský život 4.1.8 Mimovládny sektor 4.1.9 Podnikateľské prostredie 4.1.10 Materiálne zdroje 4.1.11 Cestovný ruch 4.2 Analýza vonkajšieho prostredia 4.3 SWOT 4.4 Zhodnotenie hlavných disparít a faktorov rozvoja 5. Strategická časť 5.1 Vízia rozvoja územia obce Bojničky 5.2 Strategický cieľ 6. Programová časť 6.1 Opatrenia a projekty vrátane ich priradenia k jednotlivým prioritám 6.2 Súbor ukazovateľov výsledkov a dosahov 7. Realizačná časť 7.1 Popis postupov organizačného a inštitucionálneho zabezpečenia realizácie PHSR 7.2 Systém monitorovania a hodnotenia 7.3 Akčný plán 8. Finančná časť 8.1 Indikatívny finančný plán na celú realizáciu PHSR 8.2 Model viaczdrojového financovania jednotlivých projektov Záverečná časť Prílohy Úvod Posledná dekáda 20. storočia až po súčasnosť je poznačená kumuláciou procesov, ktoré výrazne predznamenali dynamiku a charakter premien spoločensko-politických, hospodárskych, sociálnych, sociálno-kultúrnych s celou škálou pozitívnych ale aj problémových dopadov na spoločnosť i jednotlivé spoločenstvá na Slovensku.
    [Show full text]
  • Program Hospodárskeho a Sociálneho Rozvoja Mesta Leopoldov
    PROGRAM HOSPODÁRSKEHO A SOCIÁLNEHO ROZVOJA MESTA LEOPOLDOV PROGRAM HOSPODÁRSKEHO A SOCIÁLNEHO ROZVOJA MESTA LEOPOLDOV Samosprávny kraj: Trnavský Okres: Hlohovec Región: ZMO - Jaslovské Bohunice Adresa: Mestský úrad Hlohovecká cesta 2 920 41 Leopoldov Tel: 033 / 734 22 07, 734 23 88, 73 Fax: 033 / 734 22 07 Email: [email protected] [email protected] Web: www.leopoldov.sk IČO: 312703 Počet obyvateľov: 4053 Rozloha: 566 ha Prvá písomná zmienka: v roku 1665 Programovacie obdobie 2008 – 2017 2008 2 PROGRAMOVACIE OBDOBIE 2008 - 2017 PROGRAM HOSPODÁRSKEHO A SOCIÁLNEHO ROZVOJA MESTA LEOPOLDOV Sídlo: Povstalecká cesta 16 974 09 Banská Bystrica Poštová adresa: SCARABEO, s.r.o. P.O.BOX č. 8 974 09 Banská Bystrica Tel. fax. Web: 0907 439 224 [email protected] www.scarabeo.sk © SCARABEO, s.r.o. 2008, Banská Bystrica 3 PROGRAMOVACIE OBDOBIE 2008 - 2017 PROGRAM HOSPODÁRSKEHO A SOCIÁLNEHO ROZVOJA MESTA LEOPOLDOV 1 ÚVOD ................................................................................................................................................................. 6 2 ZÁKLADNÁ CHARAKTERISTIKA MESTA ............................................................................................................ 11 2.2 PRÍRODNÉ POMERY .............................................................................................................................................. 12 2.3 TECHNICKÁ INFRAŠTRUKTÚRA .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Between Denial and "Comparative Trivialization": Holocaust Negationism in Post-Communist East Central Europe
    Between Denial and "Comparative Trivialization": Holocaust Negationism in Post-Communist East Central Europe Michael Shafir Motto: They used to pour millet on graves or poppy seeds To feed the dead who would come disguised as birds. I put this book here for you, who once lived So that you should visit us no more Czeslaw Milosz Introduction* Holocaust denial in post-Communist East Central Europe is a fact. And, like most facts, its shades are many. Sometimes, denial comes in explicit forms – visible and universally-aggressive. At other times, however, it is implicit rather than explicit, particularistic rather than universal, defensive rather than aggressive. And between these two poles, the spectrum is large enough to allow for a large variety of forms, some of which may escape the eye of all but the most versatile connoisseurs of country-specific history, culture, or immediate political environment. In other words, Holocaust denial in the region ranges from sheer emulation of negationism elsewhere in the world to regional-specific forms of collective defense of national "historic memory" and to merely banal, indeed sometime cynical, attempts at the utilitarian exploitation of an immediate political context.1 The paradox of Holocaust negation in East Central Europe is that, alas, this is neither "good" nor "bad" for the Jews.2 But it is an important part of the * I would like to acknowledge the support of the J. and O. Winter Fund of the Graduate Center of the City University of New York for research conducted in connection with this project. I am indebted to friends and colleagues who read manuscripts of earlier versions and provided comments and corrections.
    [Show full text]
  • American Intelligence and the Question of Hitler's Death
    American Intelligence and the Question of Hitler’s Death Undergraduate Research Thesis Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation with honors research distinction in History in the Undergraduate colleges of The Ohio State University by Kelsey Mullen The Ohio State University November 2014 Project Advisor: Professor Alice Conklin, Department of History Project Mentor: Doctoral Candidate Sarah K. Douglas, Department of History American Intelligence and the Question of Hitler’s Death 2 Introduction The fall of Berlin marked the end of the European theatre of the Second World War. The Red Army ravaged the city and laid much of it to waste in the early days of May 1945. A large portion of Hitler’s inner circle, including the Führer himself, had been holed up in the Führerbunker underneath the old Reich Chancellery garden since January of 1945. Many top Nazi Party officials fled or attempted to flee the city ruins in the final moments before their destruction at the Russians’ hands. When the dust settled, the German army’s capitulation was complete. There were many unanswered questions for the Allies of World War II following the Nazi surrender. Invading Russian troops, despite recovering Hitler’s body, failed to disclose this fact to their Allies when the battle ended. In September of 1945, Dick White, the head of counter intelligence in the British zone of occupation, assigned a young scholar named Hugh Trevor- Roper to conduct an investigation into Hitler’s last days in order to refute the idea the Russians promoted and perpetuated that the Führer had escaped.1 Major Trevor-Roper began his investigation on September 18, 1945 and presented his conclusions to the international press on November 1, 1945.
    [Show full text]
  • Biskup Ján Vojtaššák Očami Svätej Stolice a Slovenského Exilu
    BISKUP JÁN VOJTAššÁK očami Svätej Stolice a SlovenSkého exilu Biskup Ján Vojtaššák a Svätá stolica Emília Hrabovec Ján Vojtaššák je nepochybne jednou z najvýraznejších postáv sloven- - ských dejín 20. storočia. Do historickej pamäti národa sa zapísal ako kňaz a biskup hlbokej viery a bezpodmienečnej oddanosti a lásky k Bohu, ku Ka tolíckej cirkvi a k svojmu slovenskému národu. sentireHoci nemal cum vyššieEcclesia teologické vzdelanie, stál na pevnom fundamente viery a živého vzťahu k Bohu, ktorý mu vedno s prirodzeným intelektom a pevným sapere discernere umožnil, aby si aj v najzložitejších situáciách väzenia, fyzického a psychického nátlaku a izolácie dokázal v duchovných veciach uchovať vzácne , teda schopnosť rozlišovať pravdivé od nepravdivého, preniknúť k podstate- vecí a spoznať to, čo katolík chápe ako Božiu vôľu, a tiež prekvapivú pružnosť- intelektu i srdca a vnútornú silu, z ktorej čerpal aj jeho prirodzený sklon rea govať na výzvy a ohrozenia skôr priamym, odvážnym odporom než diploma- tickým lavírovaním, skláňaním hlavy či kompromismi. Tieto mravné i osobnostné vlastnosti, nekompromisná katolíckosť a sloven- skosť, odvaha pozdvihnúť hlas aj vtedy, keď zdanlivo neexistovala ľudská nádej na úspech, osobná nenáročnosť a súčasne veľká citlivosť voči biede a nespra vodlivosti páchanej na druhých a napokon prekvapivá otvorenosť mysle i srdca, vďaka ktorej aj v najvyššom veku a po rokoch izolácie nezostal tkvieť v minulosti, ale s nádejou hľadal nové riešenia pre budúcnosť, urobili z Vojtaššáka, ktorého už politické elity prvej československej republiky považovali za nepohodlného- biskupa stojaceho v ceste odkresťančeniu i odnárodneniu Slovenska, v očiach československého komunistického režimu jedného z najväčších nepriateľov, kto rého bolo treba za každú cenu zlikvidovať.
    [Show full text]
  • Hungarian Studies Review, Vol
    Hungarian Studies Review, Vol. XXIII, No. 1 (Spring, 1996) Edmund Veesenmayer on Horthy and Hungary: An American Intelligence Report N.F. Dreisziger "As Minister to Hungary, Veesenmayer had something more than the normal duties of a Minister." (The Veesenmayer Interrogation Report, p. 21) "... it was a good thing if [Veesenmayer] did not always know everything that was going on (i.e. the Gestapo was doing) [in Hungary]." (SS leader Heinrich Himmler, cited ibid., p. 22) The role Edmund Veesenmayer played in twentieth century Hungarian history is almost without parallel. He was, to all intents and purposes, a Gauleiter, a kind of a modern satrap, in the country for the last year of the war. Hungary would have her share of quislings during the post-war communist era, but they would not be complete foreigners: the Matyas Rakosis, the Erno Geros, the Ferenc Mtinnichs, the Janos Kadars, and the Farkases (Mihaly and Vladimir) had connections to Hungary, however tenuous in some cases.1 Veesenmayer had no familial, ethnic or cultural ties to Hungary, he was simply an agent of a foreign power appointed to make sure that power's interests and wishes prevailed in the country. The closest parallel one finds to him in the post-war period is Marshal Klementy E. Voroshilov, the member of the Soviet leadership who was ap- pointed as head of the Allied Control Commission in Hungary at the end of the war. Though Voroshilov's position most resembled Veesenmayer's, it is doubtful whether the Soviet General was as often involved in meddling in Hungarian affairs as was the energetic German commissioner and his SS cohorts.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Owned' Vatican Guilt for the Church's Role in the Holocaust?
    Studies in Christian-Jewish Relations Volume 4 (2009): Madigan CP 1-18 CONFERENCE PROCEEDING Has the Papacy ‘Owned’ Vatican Guilt for the Church’s Role in the Holocaust? Kevin Madigan Harvard Divinity School Plenary presentation at the Annual Meeting of the Council of Centers on Christian-Jewish Relations November 1, 2009, Florida State University, Boca Raton, Florida Given my reflections in this presentation, it is perhaps appropriate to begin with a confession. What I have written on the subject of the papacy and the Shoah in the past was marked by a confidence and even self-righteousness that I now find embarrassing and even appalling. (Incidentally, this observation about self-righteousness would apply all the more, I am afraid, to those defenders of the wartime pope.) In any case, I will try and smother those unfortunate qualities in my presentation. Let me hasten to underline that, by and large, I do not wish to retract conclusions I have reached, which, in preparation for this presentation, have not essentially changed. But I have come to perceive much more clearly the need for humility in rendering judgment, even harsh judgment, on the Catholic actors, especially the leading Catholic actors of the period. As José Sanchez, with whose conclusions in his book on understanding the controversy surrounding the wartime pope I otherwise largely disagree, has rightly pointed out, “it is easy to second guess after the events.”1 This somewhat uninflected observation means, I take it, that, in the case of the Holy See and the Holocaust, the calculus of whether to speak or to act was reached in the cauldron of a savage world war, wrought in the matrix of competing interests and complicated by uncertainty as to whether acting or speaking would result in relief for or reprisal.
    [Show full text]
  • Portugal, Slovakia, and the Political Counter- Reformation of the Twentieth Century (1910- 1939)
    23 ZuZana Poláčková – Pieter C. van Duin Portugal, Slovakia, and the political Counter- reformation of the twentieth century (1910- 1939) This essay tries to make a comparative analysis of the political dynamics of Portugal and Slovakia in the first half of the twentieth century (1910-1939) in terms of the significance of conservative political Catholicism. The two countries belonged to a group of nations in Europe in which there was a strong reaction to political liberalism, progressive republicanism, cultural secularism, and socialism. This an- tagonism can arguably be seen as a modern continuation of the historic conflict between the Protestant and humanist Reformation and the Catholic Counter-Reformation. Its twentieth-century manifestation was of course somewhat different from the original sixteenth- and seventeenth-century conflict. After the eighteenth century the historic force of anti-Catholic Reformation was mainly expressed in the form of intellectual Enlightenment, anti-clericalism, and social and cultural progressivism. But it would seem that in many ways the dynamics and aggressive energy of this great cultural confrontation was continued during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, although in a modified ideological and political shape. The years between 1910 and 1940 were the period when the conflict between political progressivism and Catholic conservatism reached its culmination. In Portugal the forces of cultural secularism and liberal republicanism were defeated by the new authoritarian regime led by Salazar. In Slovakia the foundation and then the end of the First Czechoslovak Republic brought the rise and then the victory of the Catho- lic opposition movement, the Slovak People’s Party of Andrej Hlinka and Jozef Tiso.
    [Show full text]
  • Der ‚Judenkönig' Der Edlgasse
    S: I. M. O. N. SHOAH: I NTERVENTION. M ETHODS. DOCUMENTATION. Michal Schvarc Der ‚Judenkönig‘ der Edlgasse Gustav Hauskrecht und die Verfolgung der Juden in Bratislava 1944/19451 Abstract The Holocaust in Slovakia was not only a result of the antisemitic policy of Hlinka’s Slovak People’s Party regime headed by the Catholic priest Joseph Tiso, but also an initiative by the lower parts of society – the local aggressors. After the occupation of the country by Nazi Germany in the late summer of 1944, this situation partly changed, with the ‚solution of the Jewish question‘ becoming one of the top priorities of the occupying power. However, with- out the help of local helpers, this would hardly have been successful. One such case was Gus- tav Hauskrecht, the head of the so-called ‚Judensammelstelle‘ in Bratislava. This convinced National Socialist and uncompromising antisemite contributed significantly to the persecu- tion of Jews in the Slovak capital at the end of the war and bears a joint responsibility for their deportation to the Nazi concentration camps. This article is an attempt to biographically profile one of the main perpetrators responsible for Shoah in Slovakia. Im Juni 1961 traf sich Simon Wiesenthal in Wien mit Samson Fischer. Fischer, gebürtiger Berliner, hatte den Holocaust in Bratislava überlebt, der Hauptstadt des ersten Satellitenstaates des nationalsozialistischen Deutschland in Europa, wohin seine Eltern bald nach seiner Geburt umgezogen waren.2 Kurz nach der Zusammen- kunft schrieb Fischer Wiesenthal, er habe vergessen, ihm über zwei in der Bundes- republik Deutschland lebende „prominente Nazigrössen“ zu berichten. Einer von ihnen hieß Gustav Hauskrecht.
    [Show full text]