DOCSLIB.ORG

6.5 X 11 Double Line.P65

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
6.5 X 11 Double Line.P65 Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-84646-2 - An Introduction to Chinese Philosophy Karyn L. Lai Index More information Index alchemy 5, 15, 203 Bianzhe 5, 6, 9, 112–113, 114–123, 136–139 Analects of Confucius (Lunyu) 19–21, 45 practical concerns 15 contemporary applications of 20, 51 Bingfa (Art of War) 15 analysis, method of (see also synthesis) Book of History (Shu Jing) 21 16, 31 Book of Lord Shang 176–178 arbitrariness Book of Odes (Shi Jing) 21, 200 a concern in later Mohist philosophy 127 Buddhism 1–2 of distinctions, in Daoist philosophy 103 Chan 261–267 of names, in Zhuangzi 149–150 Chinese 1, 267–268 argument 66 Consciousness-only 253–255 suggestive imagery 16–17, 72 Flower Garland 257–261 argument by analogy 60 introduction into China 235, 244–250 Hui Shi 115 Pure Land 251 later Mohist philosophy 127, 129–130 Three Treatise 251–253 argument by appeal to authority, rejected Tian Tai 255–257 in later Mohist philosophy 138 Buddhist philosophy 236–243 argument by method of inference, in later action (karma) 241–242 Mohist philosophy 129–130, 133 and Daoist philosophy 244 argumentation apologetic texts 246–247 Chinese philosophy 15–17 bodhisattva 243 later Mohist philosophy 113 Brahmanic infl uences 241 Mohist philosophy 69 concept matching (geyi) 245–246 role of language (see also Daoist concept of existence 239, 241 philosophy, role of language) 56 craving 237–238 Baijia zhi xue (Hundred Schools eightfold noble path 238, 241 of Learning) 3, 8 enlightenment 250, 257, 261, 263–264, Ban Biao 204 265–266 Ban Gu 211–212 extra-sensory perception 237, 240 basic disposition (zhi) 27 extra-sensory phenomena 236 bian (discrimination) fourfold noble truth 237–238 later Mohist philosophy 126 Hinayanist infl uences 243, 250, 258 Mohist philosophy 67, 68 ignorance 237 Zhuangzi 149, 154 interdependence (see also causality) bian (disputation) 9 259–261 Bianzhe 112, 125–128, 136 Jainist infl uences 236, 241 Mozi 56, 68 Mahayanist tradition 243, 250, 256, 257 300 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-84646-2 - An Introduction to Chinese Philosophy Karyn L. Lai Index More information Index 301 meditation 237, 253, 261 Confucian paradigmatic person (junzi) middle-path approaches 240, 249, 19, 23, 49–51 254–255, 256, 268 independent of contemporary norms Nirvana 242 49–50 paradigmatic person (arahant) 238 Confucian philosophy paradoxes in Chan (gongan) 266–267 contexts of social engagement 31 rebirth (samsara) 236, 242 cultivation of skills 15, 24, 49–51 suffering 237 education 35 Theravadin tradition 243, 250 family relationships 8, 21, 23, 24 translation into Chinese 244–246 loyalty 9, 21, 24 Upanisadic infl uences 236, 239, 240 meritocracy 45 yoga practices 253, 255 music 28, 49 refi nement (wen) 27 causality refl ection (si) 41, 50 Buddhist philosophy 239–241, 242 shame 51 Chinese philosophy 276 zhong (commitment, being one’s best) 23 later Mohist philosophy 131–132 Confucianism, Han 2, 212 Zhuangzi 167 Confucians, as traditionalists (see also Ru) change (see also Yijing) 10–11, 223 19 anticipation of 11, 224–226, 228 Confucius 1, 19, 35 constant and ceaseless 223, 230 consciousness, in Buddhist philosophy 236, inevitability of 14, 78, 89 241–242, 253–255, 264 Chinese philosophy 1–17, 272–276 context (environment) and intellectual history 16, 136, 204 importance of 6, 12, 213 characteristics 4–17 place of humanity 8 contemporary signifi cance 273 convention (see also Daoist philosophy, development of 1, 55 against convention) 5, 97, 103, 108 empirical character 12, 128 and language use 111 human nature 37 correlative thinking (see also ganying) 10, interpretive approach 14, 220–223 212–228 cosmological thinking (see also Yijing) 7, refl ective enquiry 17, 220, 273 210–211 Civil Service Examinations 5, 35, 193 collectivist focus, Confucian philosophy dao 13, 93 (see also individualist and collectivist, all-embracing 9, 216 and Mohist philosophy) 32, 48 and de 85–89 complementation (see also opposites) 13 as power 85–86 Confucian and Mohist (Ru-Mo) debates chang dao (unchanging, absolute dao) 7, 8–9, 55–56, 60–69, 125, 145–146 74–75 Confucian government 7 ineffability 74–75, 102 accountability 47–49 intuitive grasp of 5, 104 attention to socio-political likened to uncarved wood 75, 103 infrastructure 47 method 94 commitment to people 47 nameless 74–75 cultivated person as practitioner of origin 75, 76 good government 5, 35, 47–49 principle 76 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-84646-2 - An Introduction to Chinese Philosophy Karyn L. Lai Index More information Index302 dao (cont.) Dong Zhongshu 206 teaching 94 dualism (see also opposites) 13 way (path) 71–72, 93–94 Zhuangzi 160 ecology, ecological thinking 31 Dao-de School 4 environment (see context) Daodejing (or Dao De Jing) 7, 71–72, 73, 102 natural, in Daoist philosophy as a primitivist tract 97, 100 79–80, 86, 104 discussed by Han Fei 184 epistemological questions, in Zhuangzi’s Guodian version 71 philosophy 145–152, 166 Mawangdui version 71 epistemology Daoism Daoist philosophy 104 philosophical 5 later Mohist philosophy 128 religious 5 ethical scepticism, in Zhuangzi’s Daoist philosophy 9 philosophy 155–156 against anthropocentricism 9, 78 ethics Chinese philosophy 5–6, 273–275 against convention 72, 95, 98, 99, 103, Confucian philosophy 31 105, 156, 158, 163 Zhuangzi (see also Ziran and Wuwei) complementation 13 166–167 disagreement with Confucian philosophy 95–97 fa (penal law), in Legalist philosophy 40, individual in contextual environment 88 175–178 infant metaphor 104 fa (standard) 9, 174–175 overturning existing norms/convention Legalist philosophy 176–177, 184 5, 81, 83, 105, 156 Mohist philosophy 63–69, 111, 127 responsiveness 108 fa san fa, three standards (see Mohist reversion (fan) 81 philosophy) role of language 95–97 Fa Zang 257–261 role of language in instilling attitudes feminine, in Daoist philosophy 104 96–97 feminist ethic of care 31 simplicity (pu) 102, 104 fi lial piety (xiao) 24 submissiveness 105 Five Classics (Wu Jing) of Confucianism 200, telos 103 206–207 vacuity 101 Four Books (Si Shu) of Confucianism 36, 212 withdrawal from life 97–98 Daojia (dao school, or dao doctrine) 73 Ganying (mutual resonance) 10, 13–14, Daojiao (dao religion) 73 83–84, 218–219 de Gaozi 37 power, integrity 84–87, 554 giant bird (peng) and the cicada, in virtue 51, 84–85 Zhuangzi 146–147 Deng Xi 114 Gongsun Longzi 114 litigation 114 Gongsun Long 40, 43, 118–123, 136, 142 Dialecticians (see Bianzhe) metaphysics 118–122 dichotomy, dissolution of 82 universals 121 diversity (see plurality) White Horse debate 118–123 divination (see Yijing) growth and birth, sheng 75 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-84646-2 - An Introduction to Chinese Philosophy Karyn L. Lai Index More information Index 303 Guan Zhong 162, 172, 175 inner–outer (nei–wai) debate 27 Guanzi 145, 162 interdependent self 8, 10, 49 Confucian philosophy 32, 49 Han Fei 172, 173, 174, 184–186 Daoist philosophy 107 Han Fei Zi (or Han Fei Tzu) 174 Han thought 203 Ji Zang 252–253 Happy Fish Debate, in Zhuangzi 152–154 Jianai (see Mohist philosophy) harmony 8–10 Jixia 16, 40 and change 11 Junzi (see Confucian paradigmatic person) Daoist philosophy 9 health 210–211, 217, 221–222, 229 know-how heart–mind (see xin) later Mohist philosophy 129 heaven (tian) 7 Zhuangzi 153, 157 Mohist philosophy 58, 65 knowledge heaven and earth 209, 215–216 Buddhist philosophy 237–238 Daoist philosophy 76, 78 Daoist philosophy 102–103, 167–168 heaven and humanity later Mohist philosophy 113, 128–129, 133 Confucianism 45–47 Legalist philosophy 194 Daoist philosophy 100 Mohist philosophy 68 Mencius 37, 38–39 skill of an intuitive nature (knack), in Xunzi 47 Zhuangzi 154, 157–159, 161, 163–164 Yang Zhu 46 knowledge, objects of (in later Mohist Zhongyong 45 philosophy) 128–129 heaven, earth and humanity Kumarajiva (Jiumoluoshi) 249, 251 Confucian philosophy 7, 13, 206, 214–215 Daoist philosophy 13 language 275–276 Yijing 202 language and reality holistic perspective 10, 12–13, 214–215 later Mohist philosophy 111, 136–137 Hu Shih 125 Zhuangzi 148–149, 159, 166 Huainanzi 145, 164, 208, 209–210 Lao-Zhuang philosophy 142 Huangdi Neijing 211 Laozi 72, 73 Huang-Lao philosophy (see also Legalist later Mohist Canons 123–125 philosophy) 144, 173, 181–182, 205–206 later Mohist philosophy (see also Hui Neng 262–266 argument by appeal to authority and Hui Shi 114, 115–118, 127, 136 argument by method of inference) in debate with Zhuangzi 152–154 113, 123–139 paradoxes 115–118 compound names 129–131 human nature ke-buke (admissible, not admissible) 126 Confucian philosophy (see also Mencius, lei (a particular kind) 127–128 Xunzi) 36 necessity (bi) 132–133 Confucian–Legalist debates 186–187 ran-buran (so, not-so) 126 impartial adjudicator (privileged observer), role of explanation (shuo) 128 criticised in Zhuangzi 146, 147 shi-fei (this, not-this) 126, 134 individual and whole 8, 88 tong-yi (same, different) 126–127 individualist and collectivist 7–8, 104 universal concern (jianai) 130, 134–136 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-84646-2 - An Introduction to Chinese Philosophy Karyn L. Lai Index More information Index304 leadership and music 26 Confucianism 5 and relationships 26 Daoist philosophy 93–94 and ren (see ren and li) learning as conduit for feeling 29 and morality 5 concrete instantiation 25 Confucian philosophy (see also self normative codes of conduct 25 religious ritual
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Glossary of Personal Names
    Glossary of Personal Names Ai Kai 艾恺 (Guy Alitto) Chen Duxiu 陈独秀 Ai Siqi 艾思奇 Chen Fuchen 陈黻宸 Roger Ames 安乐哲 Chen Guangzhong 陈广忠 An Qinian 安启念 Chen Guofu 陈国符 Kengo Araki 荒木见悟 Chen Guying 陈鼓应 Asano Yuichi 浅野裕一 Chen Hanzhang 陈汉章 Bai Tongdong 白彤东 Chen Jian 陈坚 Bai Xi 白溪 Chen Jing 陈静 Ban Gu 班固 Chen Jinkun 陈进坤 Bao Guizhen 宝贵贞 Chen Jiuchuan 陈九川 Bao Lige 宝力格 Chen Jiujin 陈久金 Bao Shibin 鲍世斌 Chen Junmin 陈俊民 Batu Bagan 巴图巴干 Chen Junyi 陈君毅 Bi Yangsai 毕养赛 Chen Keming 陈克明 Bo Shuren 薄树人 Chen Lai 陈来 Cai Boming 蔡伯铭 Chen Lisheng 陈立胜 Cai Degui 蔡德贵 Chen Mengjia 陈梦家 Cai Fanglu 蔡方鹿 Chen Menglin 陈猛麟 Cai Shangsi 蔡尚思 Chen Ming 陈明 Cai Yuanpei 蔡元培 Chen Pan 陈槃 Cai Zhongde 蔡仲德 Chen Shaoming 陈少明 Cao Cao 曹操 Chen Qiaojian 陈乔见 Cao Feng 曹峰 Chen Qifang 陈期芳 Cao Fujing 曹福敬 Chen Qiyun 陈启云 Cao Jianguo 曹建国 Chen Qizhi 陈启智 Cao Yaoming 曹耀明 Chen Renren 陈仁仁 Cao Zhongjian 曹中建 Chen Rongjie 陈荣捷 Ceng Xiangyun 曾祥云 Chen Rui 陈锐 Cengzi 曾子 Chen Shaoming 陈小明 Wing-Tsit Chan 陈荣捷 Chen Shengbai 陈声柏 Chen Banghuai 陈邦怀 Chen Songchang 陈松长 Chen Bao 陈莹 Chen Tongsheng 陈桐生 Chen Biao 陈彪 Chen Weiping 陈卫平 Chen Chang 陈畅 Chen Xianchu 陈先初 Chen Chun 陈淳 Chen Xianyou 陈宪猷 Chen Daqi 陈大齐 Chen Xiuzhai 陈修斋 Chen Daixiang 陈代湘 Chen Yangjiong 陈扬炯 © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, 2018 | doi 10.1163/9789004360495_018 Qiyong Guo - 9789004360495 Downloaded from Brill.com09/24/2021 05:39:45PM via free access 598 Glossary of Personal Names Chen Yaoting 陈耀庭 Dao An 道安 Chen Yingning 陈撄宁 Deng Aimin 邓艾民 Chen Yinke 陈寅恪 Deng Bingyi 邓冰夷 Chen Yong 陈勇 Deng Kewu 邓克武 Chen Yongge 陈永革 Deng Lianhe 邓联合 Chen Youqin 陈友琴 Deng Mu 邓牧 Chen Yuan 陈垣 Deng
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Paradoxes in the School of Names1 Chris Fraser University of Hong
    1 Paradoxes in the School of Names1 Chris Fraser University of Hong Kong Introduction Paradoxes are statements that run contrary to common sense yet seem to be supported by reasons and in some cases may turn out to be true. Paradoxes may be, or may entail, explicit contradictions, or they may simply be perplexing statements that run beyond or against what seems obviously correct. They may be proposed for various reasons, such as to overturn purportedly mistaken views, to illustrate problematic logical or conceptual relations, to reveal aspects of reality not reflected by received opinion, or simply to entertain. In the Western philosophical tradition, the earliest recognized paradoxes are attributed to Zeno of Elea (ca. 490–430 B.C.E.) and to Eubulides of Miletus (fl. 4th century B.C.E.). In the Chinese tradition, the earliest and most well-known paradoxes are ascribed to figures associated with the “School of Names” (ming jia 名家), a diverse group of Warring States (479–221 B.C.E.) thinkers who shared an interest in language, logic, and metaphysics. Their investigations led some of these thinkers to propound puzzling, paradoxical statements such as “Today go to Yue but arrive yesterday,” “White horses are not horses,” and “Mountains and gorges are level.” Such paradoxes seem to have been intended to highlight fundamental features of reality or subtleties in semantic relations between words and things. Why were thinkers who advanced paradoxes categorized as a school of “names”? In ancient China, philosophical inquiry concerning language and logic focused on the use of “names” (ming 名, also terms, labels, or reputation) and their semantic relations to “stuff” (shi 實, also objects, features, events, or situations).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Paradoxes in the School of Names1 Chris Fraser University of Hong
    1 Paradoxes in the School of Names1 Chris Fraser University of Hong Kong Introduction Paradoxes are statements that run contrary to common sense yet seem to be supported by reasons and in some cases may turn out to be true. Paradoxes may be, or may entail, explicit contradictions, or they may simply be perplexing statements that run beyond or against what seems obviously correct. They may be proposed for various reasons, such as to overturn purportedly mistaken views, to illustrate problematic logical or conceptual relations, to reveal aspects of reality not reflected by received opinion, or simply to entertain. In the Western philosophical tradition, the earliest recognized paradoxes are attributed to Zeno of Elea (ca. 490–430 B.C.E.) and to Eubulides of Miletus (fl. 4th century B.C.E.). In the Chinese tradition, the earliest and most well-known paradoxes are ascribed to figures associated with the “School of Names” (ming jia 名家), a diverse group of Warring States (479–221 B.C.E.) thinkers who shared an interest in language, logic, and metaphysics. Their investigations led some of these thinkers to propound puzzling, paradoxical statements such as “Today go to Yue but arrive yesterday,” “White horses are not horses,” and “Mountains and gorges are level.” Such paradoxes seem to have been intended to highlight fundamental features of reality or subtleties in semantic relations between words and things. Why were thinkers who advanced paradoxes categorized as a school of “names”? In ancient China, philosophical inquiry concerning language and logic focused on the use of “names” (ming 名, also terms, labels, or reputation) and their semantic relations to “stuff” (shi 實, also objects, features, events, or situations).
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Hanfei's Political Philosophy
    An Introduction to Hanfei’s Political Philosophy An Introduction to Hanfei’s Political Philosophy: The Way of the Ruler By Henrique Schneider An Introduction to Hanfei’s Political Philosophy: The Way of the Ruler By Henrique Schneider This book first published 2018 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2018 by Henrique Schneider All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-5275-0812-9 ISBN (13): 978-1-5275-0812-5 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface ....................................................................................................... vii Chapter One ................................................................................................. 1 Introduction – Hanfei, Legalism, Chinese Philosophy Chapter Two .............................................................................................. 27 Methodology – Reading Hanfei as a “Social Scientist”? Chapter Three ............................................................................................ 43 History – If Unimportant, Why Look at the Past? Chapter Four .............................................................................................. 65
    [Show full text]
  • Sima Tan and the Invention of Daoism, "Legalism," "Et Cetera" Author(S): Kidder Smith and Sima Tan Source: the Journal of Asian Studies, Vol
    Sima Tan and the Invention of Daoism, "Legalism," "et cetera" Author(s): Kidder Smith and Sima Tan Source: The Journal of Asian Studies, Vol. 62, No. 1 (Feb., 2003), pp. 129-156 Published by: Association for Asian Studies Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3096138 Accessed: 06-01-2016 12:20 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/ info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Association for Asian Studies and Cambridge University Press are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal of Asian Studies. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 195.113.0.105 on Wed, 06 Jan 2016 12:20:29 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Sima Tan and the Invention of Daoism, "Legalism,"et cetera KIDDER SMITH H ERE'S A SHORT VERSION: The "-ism" we invoke when we posit things like "Daoism" was glimpsed for the first time by Sima Tan-J,J--, a(d. 110 B.C.E.), lord grand astrologer (taishigongJ; _j_) to the Han court. His essay "Yaozhi"g^ (Essential points), included in the final chapter of his son Sima Qian's Taishigong,' analyzes the strengths and weaknesses of six approaches to governance: Yinyang =%|, Ru f (known to us as Confucians), Mo , (the Mohists), Fajia ~j * (called Legalists), Mingjia ; V (called Sophists), and Daojia I * (or Daode X {f , the supposed Daoists).
    [Show full text]
  • Early Chinese Thought from Confucius to Han Feizi. by Wiebke Denecke
    《中國文化研究所學報》 Journal of Chinese Studies No. 55 - July 2012 Book Reviews 321 philanthropy in China. Whether we agree with them or not about the PUMC legacy as they remember it, they deserve to be heard. Works on philanthropic foundations are voluminous. Philanthropies and their impact on society and culture will continue to be scrutinized and debated. The Oil Prince’s Legacy is a welcome addition to this literature. By looking at the Rockefeller philanthropies across the twentieth century’s longue durée, particularly with the much- heralded China’s rise in the foreground, Bullock has offered us a study that compels us to look beyond case studies and think in long terms. History moves on, and so are our perspectives. The Dynamics of Masters Literature: Early Chinese Thought from Confucius to Han Feizi. By Wiebke Denecke. Harvard-Yenching Institute Monographs 74. Cambridge, MA and London, England: Harvard University Asia Center, 2011. Pp. viii + 370. $39.95/£29.95. The Dynamics of Masters Literature is a study of early Chinese non-historical “mas- ters” prose literature in a new key. However, when the title of the books seems to refer to a person called Han Feizi 韓非子 (Master Han Fei) it has to be said that Han Fei was the name of the man, and Han Feizi was the name of the book. (Hanzi 韓 子 is first attested, as far as I know, in Huainanzi 淮南子 chapter 11, and nowhere in pre-Han times. And one notes by the way that Huainanzi seems never to be used a personal name of Liu An 劉安.) It is true that we have plenty of early Zengzi 曾子 (Master Zeng), Mengzi 孟 子 (Master Meng), and Mozi 墨子 (Master Mo).
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 10 the Pre-Qin School of Names and Their Thought
    Lecture 10 The Pre-Qin School of Names and Their Thought The thought of the pre-Qin School of Names [mingjia, also translated Logicians, Debaters, Nominalists] was not as tidy nor as systematic as Confucianism, Mohism, Daoism, or Legalism. Unlike them, it was not directed at the exhaustion of Zhou culture, and so not directly related to Zhou [1122?-255 BCE] culture. When the Confucians, Mohists, Daoists, and Legalists articulated their philosophy, they automatically brought up questions discussed by the School of Names . Thus the School of Names was a derivative and the immediate occasion of their derivation was indirectly related to the exhaustion of Zhou culture. This immediate occasion was what Confucius called “rectifying names/terms” [zheng-ming]. By the time of the Spring and Autumn [722-481 BCE] and Warring States [480-222 BCE] periods, Zhou culture had become difficult to sustain because of the corruption of the nobility and the increasing complexity of society. In other words, the aristocracy was no longer able to maintain the ritual, music, and institutions, names [i.e., titles and ranks], ritual implements, measures, and numbers institutionalized by the Duke of Zhou [Zhou Gong,12th cent. BCE]. Once the nobility degenerated, it was unavoidable that name and substance/actuality, as well as names and implements (mingqi名器), became at odds with one another and disordered. “Name and substance at odds and confused” [mingshi guailuan名實乖亂] refers to what the Analects [Lunyu] described as “The ruler not being ruler, the minister not being minister, the father not being father, the son not being son.”1 He who occupies the position of a ruler has a ruler's name and should also have the substance of a ruler, namely virtue.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Materials
    Contents ls ia er Preface..................................................at ix M Introduction .............................................ed xiii ht Key to Abbreviations .......................................ig liii yr op Part I Texts and Translations : C ss 1. Deng Xi: Deng Xizi...................................e 2 Pr 2. Yin Wen: Yin Wenzi ..................................g 44 3. Hui Shi’s Conversations with Zhuangon Zhou (Zhuangzi) ....... 114 K 4. Paradoxes (Theses) of Hui Shi gand Others ................. 162 5. Gongsun Long: Gongsun Longzion (Dao Zang Version).......... 198 H 6. Gongsun Long: Gongsunf Longzi (Modern Version) ........... 266 o ity Part II Testimonia et Fragmentars 1. Dynastic Historiesve ................................... 318 ni 2. Zuo Qiuming:U Zuo Zhuan ............................. 340 3. Zhuang Zhou:e ............................... 342 es Zhuangzi 4. Xun Kuang/Qing:n Xunzi............................... 366 hi 5. Han C Fei: Han Feizi ................................... 376 6. heLie Yukou: Liezi ..................................... 386 7.T Lü Buwei: Lü Shi Chunqiu ............................. 398 8. Liu An: Huainanzi ................................... 426 9. Liu Xiang: Zhanguoce ................................. 436 10. Huan Kuan: Yantie Lun ............................... 446 11. Liu Xiang: Shuo Yuan................................. 448 12. Liu Xiang and Liu Xin ................................ 454 13. Yang Xiong: Fa Yan .................................. 462 14. Huan Tan: Huanzi Xinlun ............................
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of the Guodian Confucian Texts
    Early Confucianism: A Study of the Guodian Confucian Texts Item Type text; Electronic Dissertation Authors Wong, Kwan Leung Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 26/09/2021 06:38:27 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/195186 EARLY CONFUCIANISM: A STUDY OF THE GUODIAN CONFUCIAN TEXTS by Kwan Leung Wong _______________________________ Copyright © Kwan Leung Wong 2006 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF EAST ASIAN STUDIES In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2006 2 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE As members of the Dissertation Committee, we certify that we have read the dissertation prepared by Kwan Leung Wong entitled EARLY CONFUCIANISM: A STUDY OF THE GUODIAN CONFUCIAN TEXTS and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ______________________________________________________________________ Date: March 24, 2006 Jiang Wu Dissertation Chair _______________________________________________ Date: March 24, 2006 Donald Harper Dissetation Co-chair ________________________________________________ Date: March 24, 2006 Anna M. Shields Final approval and acceptance of this dissertation is contingent upon the candidate’s submission of the final copies of the dissertation to the Graduate College. I hereby certify that I have read this dissertation prepared under my direction and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement.
    [Show full text]
  • The Teacup Media History of Chinese Philosophy 9-Part Series Presented by Laszlo Montgomery
    The Teacup Media History of Chinese Philosophy 9-Part Series Presented by Laszlo Montgomery Timeline of Chinese Philosophers @LaszloCHP teacup.media Name 名字 When Dynasty Elsewhere Yuzi 鬻⼦ c.1100 BCE 周 Zhou Sima Tan’s 6 Schools of Thought Guan Zhong 管仲 720 - 645 BCE 论六家要旨 Lùn Liùjiā Yàozhî Confucius Laozi ⽼⼦ ? - 531 BCE Pythagoras 570-495 BCE 孔⼦ Deng Xi 邓析 545 - 501 BCE Kôngzî Confucius 孔⼦ 551 - 479 BCE Gautama Buddha 563-480 BCE Sunzi 孙⼦ 544 - 496 BCE Mozi 墨⼦ 470 - 391 BCE Socrates 469-399 BCE 1. Confucianism 儒家 Rú Jiā Liezi 列⼦ 450 - 375 BCE Democritus 450-370 BCE 2. Daoism 道家 Dào Jiā Yang Zhu 杨朱 440 - 360 BCE Plato 427-347 BCE 3. Legalism 法家 Fâ Jiā 4. Mohism 墨家 Mò Jiā Shen Buhai 申不害 400 - 337 BCE 5. School of Names 名家 Míng Jiā 6. Yin Yang School 阴阳家 Yīnyáng Jiā 13 Confucian Classics Shang Yang 商鞅 390 - 338 BCE Aristotle 384-322 BCE ⼗三经 Shísànjīng Hui Shi 惠施 370 - 310 BCE Mengzi 孟⼦ 372 - 289 BCE 1. I Ching / The Book of Changes 易经 Yìjīng 2. The Classic of History 书经 Shūjīng Zhuangzi 庄⼦ 369 - 286 BCE 3. The Classic of Poetry 诗经 Shījīng 4. Rites of Zhou 周礼 Zhōulî Shen Dao 慎到 350 - 275 BCE Epicurus 341-270 BCE 5 Founders of Neo-Confucianism Yílî 5. Rites and Ceremonies 仪礼 Gongsun Long 公孙⻰ 325 - 250 BCE Zeno 333-264 BCE 宋明理学 6. The Classic of Rites 礼记 Lîjì Sòng Míng Lîxué 7. The Commentary of Zuo 左传 Zuô Zhuàn Zou Yan 邹衍 305 - 240 BCE 8.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Study Between Hui Shi and Other Pre-Qin Philosophers
    KEQIAN XU THE UNIQUE FEATURES OF HUI SHI’S THOUGHT: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN HUI SHI AND OTHER PRE-QIN PHILOSOPHERS INTRODUCTION Hui Shi (370-3 10 B.C.?)’ was one of the main representatives of the logician school (ming jiu) in pre-Qin Era of China. However, the historical records concerning his life and thought in the early texts that we can find today are very inadequate.’ So that it is not easy to give a deep and thorough research on his thought. Consequently, most of the studies that have been conducted so far are mainly concentrated on explaining and analyzing the meanings of his famous ten paradoxes (recorded in chapter 33 of Zhuang Zi), while the general features of Hui Shi’s thought and its special position in preQin intellectual history have not yet been fully discussed. In this paper, I try to integrate some other records about Hui Shi scattered in the early texts with the ten paradoxes in my analysis, in order to give a more panoramic and well-rounded description of Hui Shi’s thought. I would also like to consider Hui Shi and his ideas in terms of general pre-Qin intellectual background, and specially to compare it to the thoughts of some representatives of other pre-Qin schools, such as Con- fucianism, Taoism, Mohism, Legalism, etc., thus to point out the unique features of Hui Shi’s thsught . 1 Hui Shi’s doctrine that we can find today are mainly the ten para- JOU~Of Chinee fiil~sOphy24 (I 997) 231 -253 Copyright 01997 by Dhlogue Publishing Company,Honolulu.
    [Show full text]
  • Humor in Ancient Chinese Philosophy Author(S): Christoph Harbsmeier Source: Philosophy East and West, Vol
    Humor in Ancient Chinese Philosophy Author(s): Christoph Harbsmeier Source: Philosophy East and West, Vol. 39, No. 3, Philosophy and Humor (Jul., 1989), pp. 289- 310 Published by: University of Hawai'i Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1399450 Accessed: 08/08/2010 22:41 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=uhp. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. University of Hawai'i Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Philosophy East and West. http://www.jstor.org Christoph Harbsmeier Humor in ancient Chinese philosophy Man has been defined as the laughinganimal.1 He not only belongs to his culture, he may also react to his own culture-for example, by laughingat it.
    [Show full text]