Child Acquisition of Sociolinguistic Variation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Child Acquisition of Sociolinguistic Variation Child Acquisition of Sociolinguistic Variation A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics By Shannon Mooney, M.A. Washington, DC February 27, 2020 Copyright c 2020 by Shannon Mooney All Rights Reserved ii Child Acquisition of Sociolinguistic Variation Shannon Mooney, M.A. Dissertation Advisor: Jennifer Nycz, Ph.D. Abstract This dissertation explores the acquisition of sociolinguistic variation by 5;0 to 6;0 year old children in a public bilingual immersion elementary school setting. It shows how children at this age engage in spontaneous stylistic variation during play with peers, suggesting early diffusion of non-local forms. The capacity for stylistic varia- tion indicates an emergent sociolinguistic competence. This emergent sociolinguistic competence is then shown to play a role in phonological accommodation to peers and acquisition of a second dialect vowel system over the course of the first year at school, as, by the end of the school year, children were found to move toward the vowel system of the classmate to whom they showed the most affinity. Spontaneous child speech with classmates was recorded at monthly timepoints throughout a year of ethnographic fieldwork at the school. Vowel formants in fifteen lexical classes were extracted from the recordings to test for the presence of the traditional Eastern New England English (ENEE) dialect vowel system, as well as the vowel systems of surrounding regional dialects and vowels undergoing change in multiple North American English varieties. While a qualitative analysis reveals stylistic variation in performance of personae during roleplay, statistical modeling using classification and regression trees (CART) shows accommodation to the vowel system of a second dialect that appears to be subject to interpersonal relationships between peers as well as a potential influence of peer ethnicity. iii A major finding from this study is the amount of linguistic variation that exists between peers in this public early education setting that draws students from across many residentially-segregated communities in a small post-industrial city near Boston. The exposure of the very young children in this study to extensive linguistic variation leads to an active role for the children’s sociolinguistic competence as they navigate relationships with peers, identity, stances, power, and development into adult-like sociolinguistic actors. Index words: sociolinguistic development, dialect acquisition, phonological accommodation, stylistic variation, child speech, language in schools, peer learning, ethnicity, Eastern New England English iv Dedication For Elsie. v Acknowledgments Jen, we did it! Thank you for everything — our writing retreats, coffees at the cathe- dral, celebratory text messages, etc. From when I first reached out to you for advice in early 2009, you have been there for me, allowing me to find my way academically and develop an independent and interdisciplinary voice while also having my back and putting in sometimes a lot of effort just to keep me going. I am also grateful to Natalie Schilling for her guidance while I was designing and carrying out the project, as well as for her enthusiasm and engagement throughout, and for some truly restora- tive lunches. I am grateful as well to Elissa Newport for taking me under her wing and welcoming me into her lab meetings and reading groups, and for encouraging me along as I discovered and began to engage with foundational concepts in cognitive science and developmental psychology. Elissa, I also admire and am deeply grateful for your fierce advocacy for women. I am grateful to Youngah Do for serving on an earlier version of my dissertation committee while at Georgetown, as well as for our evolving collaborative relationship now that we find ourselves on opposite sides of the world. Thank you, above all, to my parents Jean and Joe Mooney, as well as Pat Mooney and Alisen Downey, whose support, love, and encouragement have sustained me through the completion of this very long project. I am also grateful for my Glover Park family, Lara Bryfonski, Lindley Winchester, Andrew Scanlan, and Nick Osmund- son. Thank you to my ‘second parents’, Kathy and Mike Lentini, who provided me with food, shelter, a car(!), and friendship during my year of fieldwork. Thanks as vi well to staff and students at the Center for New Designs in Learning and Scholarship (CNDLS), and especially to Eddie Maloney, Maggie Debelius, and Yianna Vovides for their support, understanding, and encouragement of me while completing this work. Thank you to Caitlin Crafton, Desniq Campbell, and Adam Leader-Smith for the cupcakes, the balloons, and the hugs, and thank you, Joselyn Schultz Lewis, just for being you. I am grateful to Dr. Susan McGilvray-Rivet, and to Dr. Anna Nolin for con- necting us, as well as to Framingham Public Schools administrators, teachers, aides, volunteers, and families. Thanks especially to my Kindergarten participants (now third-graders!) and their families, who will remain very special to me always. Very en- thusiastic thanks to Sarah Sybicki, who is the most amazingly brilliant and dedicated research assistant I could have ever asked for. Thanks also to all the research assis- tants who have contributed to the project: Annie Xie, Kenzie Offley, Daniel Wheelock, Jocelyn Alvarez, Jade Ponciano, Nimitha Kommoju, and Elizabeth Krueger. Lastly, I am grateful to the National Science Foundation DDRI Linguistics Program for their financial support of this project (Award no. 1729018). vii Contents Chapter 1 Introduction . .1 2 Context: Social and Linguistic Diversity in the Greater Boston Area . .8 2.1 The Greater Boston Area . .8 2.1.1 “The Most Racist City in America” . 12 2.1.2 Kindergarten Representation Index . 15 2.2 The Community: Framingham, MA . 19 2.2.1 Ethnic and Racial Diversity and Immigration . 20 2.2.2 Linguistic Diversity . 21 2.2.3 Residential Segregation by Neighborhood . 22 2.2.4 Dissimilarity, Isolation, and Exposure Measures . 25 2.2.4.1 Dissimilarity Index . 26 2.2.4.2 Isolation Index . 27 2.2.4.3 Exposure to Other Groups . 28 2.2.5 Poverty and Race/Ethnicity . 29 2.2.6 Issues with Relying on Census Data . 30 2.3 Conclusion . 31 3 Methodology: Sociolinguistic Fieldwork for a Linguistically Diverse Ur- ban Elementary School . 33 3.1 Introduction to the Fieldsite . 33 3.1.1 Immersion Elementary School . 35 3.1.2 Ethnicity and Labels . 37 3.2 Participants and Participant Selection . 41 3.3 School Culture and Implications for Language Use . 50 3.3.1 Exposure to Spanish and English . 52 3.3.2 Bilingual Immersion in the School Day . 52 3.3.3 English Classes . 54 3.4 Methods of Data Collection and Data Analysis . 55 3.4.1 Recording Schedule . 57 3.4.2 Recording Equipment . 59 3.4.3 Data Processing . 61 3.4.3.1 Transcription and Alignment of Recordings . 62 3.4.3.2 Coding and Extraction of Phonetic Data . 65 viii 3.4.4 Additional Data Artifacts . 65 3.4.4.1 Class Transcripts . 66 3.4.4.2 Sociomatrices . 66 3.4.4.3 Observation Notes . 67 3.4.4.4 Parent Surveys . 68 3.5 Conclusion . 68 4 The Development of Style . 70 4.1 Stylistic Practice . 73 4.1.1 Style and Stylistic Variation . 73 4.1.1.1 Models of Stylistic Variation and Language Change . 74 4.1.2 Stance and Indexicality . 75 4.1.3 Acquisition of Stylistic Practice . 78 4.1.4 Performance . 82 4.2 Young Children as Social Actors . 85 4.2.1 Participant Details . 86 4.2.1.1 Age . 86 4.2.1.2 Neighborhood and Background . 88 4.3 KIT, DRESS, TRAP, GOAT, GOOSE, and FOOT Vowels . 92 4.3.1 Front Lax Vowels KIT, DRESS, and TRAP . 92 4.3.2 Back Vowels GOAT, GOOSE, and FOOT . 93 4.3.3 California Vowel Shift . 94 4.4 Case Study: Acquisition of ‘rude’ . 97 4.4.1 The Phonetics of ‘rude’ . 114 4.5 Case Study: Stylization in Roleplay . 116 4.5.1 Normalization . 119 4.5.2 Performance Vowel Classes . 121 4.5.2.1 GOOSE and FOOT . 124 4.5.2.2 KIT, DRESS, and TRAP . 125 4.5.2.3 GOAT . 129 4.6 Discussion . 132 5 Peer Affinity and Accommodation in Dialect Acquisition . 135 5.1 Background . 135 5.1.1 Input . 136 5.1.2 Accommodation and Second Dialect Acquisition . 138 5.1.2.1 Interactive Alignment Theory . 145 5.1.2.2 Audience Design Theory and Communication Accommodation Theory . 147 5.2 Affinity and Attention . 148 5.2.1 Testing the Role of Input . 148 5.2.2 Nardy et al. (2014) . 150 ix 5.2.3 Affinity Mapping . 151 5.2.4 Power and Conflict . 154 5.3 Variables . 156 5.3.1 Low Vowel Systems . 156 5.3.2 Canadian Raising . 157 5.3.3 Coding and Extraction . 159 5.3.4 Normalization . 162 5.4 Phonetic Convergence . 168 5.5 Dialect Acquisition . 175 5.5.1 Low Vowel Systems . 175 5.5.1.1 Baselines . 177 5.5.2 Canadian Raising . 184 5.5.2.1 Baselines . 186 5.5.3 Testable Hypotheses . 188 5.5.4 Change to Individual Systems . 191 5.5.4.1 Marshall . 191 5.5.4.2 Sienna . 196 5.6 Discussion and Limitations . 200 6 Conclusion . 207 6.1 Contributions . 207 6.2 Discussion of Findings . 209 6.3 Limitations and Directions for Future Research . 212 Appendix A Additional Demographics Tables . 214 B Parent Dialect Background and Attitudes Survey Text . 216 C Roleplay: Full Transcripts . 223 D Summary Tables for Low Vowel Systems Regression Tree Models . 240 Bibliography ................................... 244 x List of Figures 2.1 Major roadways in Metrowest Boston (Google n.d.).
Recommended publications
  • Phonetic Enhancement and Three Patterns of English A-Tensing
    University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics Volume 23 Issue 1 Proceedings of the 40th Annual Penn Article 21 Linguistics Conference 2017 Phonetic Enhancement and Three Patterns of English a-Tensing Yining Nie New York University Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl Recommended Citation Nie, Yining (2017) "Phonetic Enhancement and Three Patterns of English a-Tensing," University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics: Vol. 23 : Iss. 1 , Article 21. Available at: https://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol23/iss1/21 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol23/iss1/21 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Phonetic Enhancement and Three Patterns of English a-Tensing Abstract English a-tensing has received numerous treatments in the phonological and sociolinguistic literature, but the question of why it occurs (i) at all and (ii) in seemingly unnatural disjunctive phonological environments has not been settled. This paper presents a novel phonetic enhancement account of a-tensing in Philadelphia, New York City and Belfast English. I propose that a-tensing is best understood as an allophonic process which facilitates the perceptual identity and articulatory ease of nasality, voicing and/or segment duration in the following consonant. This approach unifies the apparently unnatural phonological environments in which the two a variants surface and predicts the attested dialectal patterns. A synchronic account of a-tensing also provides
    [Show full text]
  • The Reversal of a Sound Change in Cincinnati Stephanie M
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ScholarlyCommons@Penn University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics Volume 3 Issue 1 (N)WAVES and MEANS: A selection of Article 19 papers from NWAVE 24 1-1-1996 The Reversal of a Sound Change in Cincinnati Stephanie M. Strassel Charles Boberg This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. http://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol3/iss1/19 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Reversal of a Sound Change in Cincinnati This working paper is available in University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics: http://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol3/ iss1/19 The Reversal of a Sound Change in Cincinnati Stephanie M. Strassel and Charles Boberg University of Pennsylvania 1 Introduction One of the most important variables for characterizing and distinguishing American English dialects is the phoneme /'iJ:./, or "short-a", the sound of mat, mass and man. Many dialects have two main allophones of l'i1:-/: a tense ['iJ:.h], characterized by phonetic raising along the outer perimeter of the vowel space and the development of a central in-glide; and a lax, monophthongal ['iJ:.] more or less in the position of cardinal ['iJ:.]. In some dialects these allophones have split into two phonem~. Labov (1991:12), in putting forth a tertiary typology of English dialects, calls this split one of two "pivot points" in American English. Some of the oldest American dialects, those on the Atlantic Coast and in the South, have tense /'iJ:./ in a restricted set of environments, most commonly before front nasals, voiceless fricatives and varying subsets of the voiced consonants.
    [Show full text]
  • English Grammar in American Schools Before 1850
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF EDUCATION BULLETIN, 1921, No. 12 ENGLISH GRAMMAR IN AMERICAN SCHOOLS BEFORE 1850 By ROLLO LAVERNE LYMAN THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO .e WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1922 ADDITIONAL COPIES OF THIS PUBLICATION NAT BE pm-let:Ran FROM THE SCPERINTICNDENT OF DOCUMENTS GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON, D. C. AT 20 CENTS PER COPY CONTENTS. Page. Introduction 5 Chapter I.Early instruction In the vernacular precedingEnglish gram- mar 11 1. Character of vernacular instruction In English. 1596-1422 12 2. Reasons for early emphasis on vernacular in America 15 3. Character of vernacular instruction in America. 1620-1720 17 Chapter IT. -Early apitearanes of English grammar inAmerica... 21 1. SChools and schoolmasters teaching Englishgrammar before 1775 ... 0 21 , 2. English grammars in America before 1781. 33 3. Early instruction in English grammar in Americancolleges 36 Chapter 11.1. - =Influences adding grammars to the curriculum 43 1. Franklin's English school 43 2. The influence of the Philadelphia English school 49 3. Educational theories supporting grammar in Americapp to 1775 .55 Chapter !V.The rapid rise of grammar after 1775 70 1. The legislative recognition of grammar 70 2. The flood of textbooks after 1784 77 3. The .extent of, lustruction in grammar th repre,entative.States. 1800 -1850 82 4. The status of grammhr. 1850 to 1870 02 Chapter S.Traditional rriethodh of teaching Lan grammar transferred to English grammar 103 1. Grammar as an art.. 105 2. Methods used in stadying Lily, and Latingrammar in general seventeenth century 107 3. Latin methods carried directly to Englishgrammar memorization 111 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Ruaridh Purse [email protected]
    Ruaridh Purse [email protected] Education and Qualifications 2016– Ph.D. in Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania Advisor: Dr. Meredith Tamminga 2019 CTL Graduate Teaching Certificate, University of Pennsylvania Center for Teaching and Learning 2012–2016 M.A. (First Class Honours) in Linguistics, University of Edinburgh Dissertation: An Electromagnetic Articulography Perspective on ‘/t,d/ Deletion’ Advisor: Dr. Alice Turk Publications Purse, Ruaridh, 2019. The envelope of variation for /l/ vocalisation in Philadelphia English. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, volume 25(2) Purse, Ruaridh, 2019. The Articulatory Reality of Coronal Stop ‘Deletion’. Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences (XIX). Melbourne, Australia Purse, Ruaridh, 2019. Variable Word-Final Schwa in French: An OT Analysis. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, volume 25(1) Cardoso, Amanda and Lauren Hall-Lew, Yova Kemenchedjieva, Ruaridh Purse, 2016. Between California and the Pacific Northwest: The Front Lax Vowels in San Francisco English. In Valerie Fridland, Betsy Evans, Tyler Kendall, and Alicia Wassank, eds. Speech in the Western States, Volume 1: The Coastal States, pp. 33–54. Publication of the American Dialect Society. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. DOI: 10.1215/00031283- 3772890 Purse, Ruaridh and Euan McGill, 2016. An Intraspeaker Variation Study of Scottish English /r/ Pharyngealisation. Lifespans & Styles: Undergraduate Working Papers On Variation. 2(2): 36–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2218/ls.v2i2.2016 Hall-Lew, Lauren and Amanda Cardoso, Yova Kemenchedjieva, Kieran Wilson, Ruaridh Purse, and Julie Saigusa, 2015. San Francisco English and the California Vowel Shift. Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences (XVIII).
    [Show full text]
  • Ki(Ng) in the North : Effects of Duration, Boundary and Pause on Post-Nasal [ɡ]-Presence
    This is a repository copy of Ki(ng) in the North : effects of duration, boundary and pause on post-nasal [ɡ ]-presence. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/140612/ Version: Published Version Article: Bailey, George orcid.org/0000-0001-5137-8394 (2019) Ki(ng) in the North : effects of duration, boundary and pause on post-nasal [ɡ ]-presence. Laboratory Phonology. ISSN 1868-6354 https://doi.org/10.5334/labphon.115 Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ hon Bailey, G. 2019 Ki(ng) in the north: Effects of duration, boundary, labla Laboratory Phonology Journal of the Association for and pause on post-nasal [ɡ]-presence. Laboratory Phonology: phon Laboratory Phonology Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology 10(1): 3, pp. 1–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/labphon.115 JOURNAL ARTICLE Ki(ng) in the north: Effects of duration, boundary, and pause on post-nasal [ɡ]-presence George Bailey1,2 1 University of Manchester, UK 2 University of York, UK [email protected] This paper highlights a hitherto unreported change in progress among northern speakers of British English, with increasing post-nasal [ɡ]-presence in words like sing or wrong pre-pausally.
    [Show full text]
  • Sound Change
    Sound change Andrew Garrett UC Berkeley “[T]he causes of sound change are unknown.” — Leonard Bloomfield, Language (1933:385) 1 Introduction If new words and lexical usages are the most recognizable aspect of language change, the emergence of novel pronunciation patterns and the existence of distinct accents of the same language are also familiar to casual observers.1 Despite its ubiquity, there is no generally accepted definition of sound change. It certainly includes phonologization, whereby an automatic phonetic property evolves into a language-specific phonological one (Jakobson 1931, Hyman 1977, 2012). For some analysts, the phenomenon of sound change also encompasses phonological change with other origins, such as dialect contact, paradigm regularization, or structural simplification. Defining the object of study is important when different definitions lead to different views of its mechanisms and properties. Nonetheless, in what follows I take a pragmatic approach, highlighting some phenomena, questions, and further literature that seem especially interesting at present, and setting others aside. Students entering the field in 2013 will find a different landscape from that of a generation ago. Inquiry into the causes and pathways of sound change has been transformed by the work of five scholars in particular. Three of them, Paul Kiparsky (1988, 1995), William Labov (e.g. 1981, 1994, 2001, 2010), and Björn Lindblom (Lindblom 1990, Lindblom et al. 1995), have proposed influential structural analyses of changes within their sound systems. Two others, Juliette Blevins (e.g. Blevins and Garrett 1998, 2004, Blevins 2004, 2006a) and John Ohala (e.g. 1974, 1981, 1983, 1993), have also emphasized the role of articulatory detail and perceptual processes in determining the course of sound changes.
    [Show full text]
  • Phonological Change in Philadelphia /Æ
    Chapter 2 Phonological Change in Philadelphia /æ/ While the scale of sociolinguistic data has increased dramatically, given technological advances in recording, transcription, and measurement, most corpora still fall short of the necessary data to analyze the mechanism of phonological change. The problem of capturing the elusive timing of a change, as outlined in Hockett (1958) “on such-and-such a day, for such-and such- a speaker or tiny group of speakers, the two fell together [...] and the whole system [...] was restructured” re- quires any empirical investigation into phonological change to contain data from speakers before this sudden restructuring as well as data from speakers after this sudden restructuring. Because phonological restructuring does not occur as frequently as phonetic change, any corpus that en- compasses the entire change – before and after – must either be specically targeted towards a potential change (as in the case of Johnson’s 2010 investigation of the spread of the low-back merger in Massachusetts) or contain enough longitudinal data to capture a change. As sociolin- guistic corpora continue to be built up (e.g., Buckeye Corpus, Origins of New Zealand English Corpus, Philadelphia Neighborhood Corpus, Voices of California Project, inter alia) this longitudi- nal data will become more and more possible. In addition to requiring a large longitudinal corpus to capture a change, any phonological change resulting in a merger or a split also will require a massive amount of per-speaker data in order to disambiguate between the three mechanisms 21 of phonological change: since phonetic similarity renders individual tokens dicult to classify phonologically, an analysis of the mechanism of change for a merger or a split will rely primarily on the distribution of the data.
    [Show full text]
  • New England Daniel Ezra Johnson and David Durian
    chapter 11 New England Daniel Ezra Johnson and David Durian 11.1 Introduction The six New England states, although they contain less than 5% of the population of the United States (and comprise less than 2.5% of its area), have played an outsized role in the political, economic, and cultural his- tory of the nation. In the study of American dialects, too, a strong focus has been placed on New England. In part, this has resulted from a per- ception that it is the home of a great deal of linguistic diversity, consid- ering its size. And the speech of Boston (and eastern New England more generally) does have some characteristics – for example, the combination of non-rhoticity and the use of the “broad a” – that are fairly unique in the North American context, and recall features of some Southern British English varieties. The early volumes ofDialect Notes contained many contributions from New England. Then, the pilot endeavor of the Linguistic Atlas of the United States and Canada (LAUSC) project was chosen to be the Linguistic Atlas of New England (LANE) (Kurath, et al. 1939–1943). These volumes, mod- eled on contemporary European dialect atlases, turned out to be the only LAUSC product that would be published in the form of an atlas. LANE is known for the attention paid to social class and age in its sam- pling procedure (the oldest speakers were born before 1850), and for the use of nine fieldworkers to cover the territory, each trained in on-the-spot phonetic transcription (since recording devices were not available at the time of initial fieldwork).
    [Show full text]
  • An Experimental Study of Court Reporter Accuracy in Transcription of African American English Taylor Jones Jessica Rose Kalbfeld
    LANGUAGE AND PUBLIC POLICY Testifying while black: An experimental study of court reporter accuracy in transcription of African American English Taylor Jones Jessica Rose Kalbfeld University of Pennsylvania New York University RYAN HANCOCK ROBIN CLARK Philadelphia Lawyers for Social Equity University of Pennsylvania Court reporters are certified at either 95% or 98% accuracy, depending on their certifying or - ganization; however, the measure of accuracy is not one that evaluates their ability to transcribe nonstandard dialects. Here, we demonstrate that Philadelphia court reporters consistently fail to meet this level of transcription accuracy when confronted with mundane examples of spoken African American English (AAE). Furthermore, we show that they often cannot demonstrate un - derstanding of what is being said. We show that the different morphosyntax of AAE, the different phonological patterns of AAE, and the different accents in Philadelphia related to residential seg - regation all conspire to produce transcriptions that not only are inaccurate, but also change the of - ficial record of who performed what actions under which circumstances, with potentially dramatic legal repercussions for everyday speakers of AAE.* Keywords : African American English, comprehension, criminal justice, inequality ‘I hereby certify that the proceedings and evidence are contained fully and accurately in the notes taken by me on the trial of the above cause, and that this copy is a correct transcript of the same.’ —standard court transcript boilerplate 1. Introduction. The criminal justice system of the United States rests on the idea that every criminal defendant has the right to a speedy and fair trial (per the sixth amendment of the US Constitution).
    [Show full text]
  • Adult Literacy, GED & English Language Resources in Philadelphia
    Adult Literacy, GED & English Language Resources in Philadelphia Office of Adult Education, City of Philadelphia Enrolling adult learners in basic education, high school equivalency prep (GED & HISET) and English as a Second Language (ESL) classes in their neighborhood. Also offers free public computing classes. 990 Spring Garden Street http://philaliteracy.org Third Floor, Suite 300 Phone number: (215) 686-5250 Philadelphia, PA 19123 Email Address: [email protected] Center for Literacy CFL provides a range of free community literacy programs: Adult Education classes to improve the literacy skills, classes to prepare for the GED or High School Equivalency and English as a Second Language (ESL) classes. 399 Market Street https://www.centerforliteracy.org Suite 201 Phone number: 215-474-1235 Philadelphia, PA 19106 Email Address: [email protected] School District of Phila. Re-Engagement Center- Multiple Pathways Programs Multiple Pathways Programs gives Philadelphia residents who have fallen behind in school several different "Pathways" to High School Diploma attainment. The programs include: Accelerated High School Pathway, Educational Options Program (EOP), Gateway to College Pathway, Community- Based GED & Literacy Pathway and Crossroads Accelerated Academy. Programs are offered at a variety Alternative Education: 215-400-4230 Email Address: [email protected] of locations. Please contact the Re-Engagement Center: 215-400-6700 organization for details. Free Library of Philadelphia- Classes & Resources for Adults Libraries located throughout Philadelphia provide a variety of child, teen, and adult reading programs including GED. A few of the programs include: Adult Education Classes, Computer Classes, New Americans which has materials and services to help you as you get settled in Philadelphia.
    [Show full text]
  • Office of Multilingual Curriculum and Programs
    UPDATED January 2019 OFFICE OF MULTILINGUAL CURRICULUM AND PROGRAMS 440 N. Broad Street, Suite 251 Philadelphia, PA 19130 Phone: 215­400­5340 Fax: 214­400­4282 1 UPDATED January 2019 2 UPDATED January 2019 ENGLISH LEARNERS PROGRAMMING HANDBOOK TABLE OF CONTENTS Contents I. INTRODUCTION 6 A. Guiding Principles 7 II. STATUTES, POLICIES, AND LEGAL REQUIREMENTS 8 A. Federal Laws, State Laws, and School District of Philadelphia Policies 8 1. Federal Policies 8 2. State Policies 9 3. Local Policies 9 B. EL Identification and Program Enrollment 10 1. Overview 10 2 . Primary Home Language Other Than English (PHLOTE) List 11 A . Multilingual Assessment Center (MAC) 12 III. Proficiency Standards & Levels – World­Class Instructional Design and Assessment (WIDA) Consortium 12 A. The English Language Development (ELD) Standards 12 B. Four Language Domains 13 C. Proficiency Levels 14 D. Can Do Descriptors and Model Proficiency Indicators 15 1. Can Do Descriptors 15 2. Can Do Descriptors, Key Uses Edition 15 3. Model Performance Indicators 15 IV. LANGUAGE INSTRUCTION EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM (LIEP) IMPLEMENTATION 16 A. English as a Second Language (ESL) 16 B. Dual Language Program 16 C. Newcomer Learning Academy (NLA) 17 D. Sheltered Instruction/EL Friendly Instruction 18 E. Supplemental Language Programs 18 V. ESL IMPLEMENTATION 19 A. ESL: Grades K­8 19 3 UPDATED January 2019 Collaborative ELD Instruction: K­8 19 ESL Programming: K­8 19 Rostering Directive: K­8 20 B. ESL: Grades 9­12 21 Foundational Beliefs 21 Course Sequence 21 ESL English and Elective Courses 22 Academic Core 23 English Language Development (ELD) Materials 25 Rostering Guidelines for ELs in Grades 9­12 27 Block Rostering Guidelines 27 Sample Block Roster Chart for ELD Classes 28 ELD English Placement for High Schools 28 VI.
    [Show full text]
  • A Morphosyntactic Account of Indexical Pronouns
    The Spatiotemporal Dimensions of Person A Morphosyntactic Account of Indexical Pronouns Published by LOT phone: +31 30 253 5775 Trans 10 e-mail: [email protected] 3512 JK Utrecht http://www.lotschool.nl The Netherlands Cover illustration: Bettina Gruber & Alexis Dimitriadis ISBN: 978-94-6093-123-9 NUR: 616 Copyright © 2013 Bettina Gruber. All rights reserved. The Spatiotemporal Dimensions of Person A Morphosyntactic Account of Indexical Pronouns De spatio-temporele dimensies van Persoon Een morfosyntactische verklaring van indexicale pronomina (met een samenvatting in het Nederlands) Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Universiteit Utrecht op gezag van de rector magnificus, prof. dr. G.J. van der Zwaan, ingevolge het besluit van het college voor promoties in het openbaar te verdedigen op donderdag 14 november 2013 's ochtends te 10.30 uur door Bettina Gruber geboren op 17 mei 1975 te Gmunden, Oostenrijk Promotores: Prof.dr. N.F.M. Corver Prof.dr. L.C.J. Barbiers Co-promotor: Dr. J.M. van Koppen F¨urmeine Mama und meinen Papa Contents List of Tables . xi Acknowledgements . xv Abbreviations . xxi I Introduction 1 1 What This Thesis Is About . .1 1.1 The Main Research Questions . .2 1.2 The Hypothesis . .3 2 Person, Deictic Space, and Indexicality . .5 2.1 A Few Notes on the Terminology . .6 2.2 Some Traditional Issues of Indexicality . .7 2.3 Deictic and Grammatical Person . .9 2.4 Reconsidering the Category Person . 18 3 Summary and Outlook . 20 II Analysis: a First Outline 25 1 Setting the Stage . 25 2 The Internal Structure of Indexical Pronouns .
    [Show full text]