DOCSLIB.ORG

Old Khmer Grammar Pacific Linguistics 611

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Old Khmer Grammar Pacific Linguistics 611 Old Khmer grammar Pacific Linguistics 611 Pacific Linguistics is a publisher specialising in grammars and linguistic descriptions, dictionaries and other materials on languages of the Pacific, Taiwan, the Philippines, Indonesia, East Timor, southeast and south Asia, and Australia. Pacific Linguistics, established in 1963 through an initial grant from the Hunter Douglas Fund, is associated with the Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies at The Australian National University. The authors and editors of Pacific Linguistics publications are drawn from a wide range of institutions around the world. Publications are refereed by scholars with relevant expertise, who are usually not members of the editorial board. FOUNDING EDITOR: Stephen A. Wurm EDITORIAL BOARD: John Bowden and I Wayan Arka (Managing Editors), Mark Donohue, Nicholas Evans, David Nash, Andrew Pawley, Malcolm Ross, Paul Sidwell, Jane Simpson, and Darrell Tryon EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD: Karen Adams, Arizona State University Marian Klamer, Universiteit Leiden Alexander Adelaar, University of Melbourne Harold Koch, The Australian National Peter Austin, School of Oriental and African University Studies Frantisek Lichtenberk, University of Byron Bender, University of Hawai‘i Auckland Walter Bisang, Johannes Gutenberg- John Lynch, University of the South Pacific Universität Mainz Patrick McConvell, Australian Institute of Robert Blust, University of Hawai‘i Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander David Bradley, La Trobe University Studies Lyle Campbell, University of Utah William McGregor, Aarhus Universitet James Collins, Universiti Kebangsaan Ulrike Mosel, Christian-Albrechts- Malaysia Universität zu Kiel Bernard Comrie, Max Planck Institute for Claire Moyse-Faurie, Centre National de la Evolutionary Anthropology Recherche Scientifique Soenjono Dardjowidjojo, Universitas Atma Bernd Nothofer, Johann Wolfgang Goethe- Jaya Universität Frankfurt am Main Matthew Dryer, State University of New York Bambang Kaswanti Purwo, Universitas Atma at Buffalo Jaya Jerold A. Edmondson, University of Texas at Ger Reesink, Universiteit Leiden Arlington Lawrence Reid, University of Hawai‘i Margaret Florey, Monash University Jean-Claude Rivierre, Centre National de la William Foley, University of Sydney Recherche Scientifique Karl Franklin, SIL International Melenaite Taumoefolau, University of Charles Grimes, SIL International Auckland Nikolaus Himmelmann, University of Tasaku Tsunoda, University of Tokyo Münster John Wolff, Cornell University Lillian Huang, National Taiwan Normal Elizabeth Zeitoun, Academica Sinica University Old Khmer grammar Philip N. Jenner and Paul Sidwell Pacific Linguistics School of Culture, History and Language College of Asia and the Pacific The Australian National University Published by Pacific Linguistics School of Culture, History and Language College of Asia and the Pacific The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200 Australia Copyright in this edition is vested with Pacific Linguistics First published 2010 National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry: Author: Jenner, Philip N. Title: Old Khmer grammar / Philip Jenner and Paul Sidwell. ISBN: 9780858836136 (pbk.) Subjects: Khmer language--To 800--Grammar. Inscriptions, Khmer. Other Authors/ Sidwell, Paul J. Contributors: Australian National University. School of Culture, History and Language, College of Asia and the Pacific. Dewey Number: 495.935 Typeset by Paul Sidwell Cover: photo courtesy of EFEO, Paris, image of inscritpion K876 Cover design by Julie Manley/Addcolour Digital Pty Ltd Printed and bound by Addcolour Digital Pty Ltd, Fyshwick, Canberra in memoriam Miyo Contents PREFATORY NOTES..................................................................................................................................IX ABBREVIATIONS .......................................................................................................................................XI 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 1 2 THE WRITING SYSTEM.................................................................................................................... 3 2.1. VOWEL SYMBOLS................................................................................................................................... 4 2.2. CONSONANT SYMBOLS........................................................................................................................... 4 2.2.1. Aspirate Consonant Symbols. ........................................................................................................ 4 2.3. TRANSLITERATION. ................................................................................................................................ 5 3 PHONOLOGY....................................................................................................................................... 6 3.1. VOWELS. ................................................................................................................................................ 6 3.2. CONSONANTS. ........................................................................................................................................ 7 3.2.1. Consonant Clusters........................................................................................................................ 7 3.3. SYLLABLE AND WORD STRUCTURE........................................................................................................ 8 3.3.1. The Monosyllable........................................................................................................................... 8 3.3.2. The Subdissyllable. ........................................................................................................................ 8 3.3.3. The Dissyllable............................................................................................................................... 8 3.3.4. Compounds. ................................................................................................................................... 8 3.3.5. Loanwords. .................................................................................................................................... 9 4 MORPHOLOGY ................................................................................................................................. 10 4.1. AFFIXATION.......................................................................................................................................... 10 4.1.1. Infixes........................................................................................................................................... 10 4.1.2. Prefixes. ....................................................................................................................................... 10 4.1.3. Reduplication. .............................................................................................................................. 11 4.1.4. Analogic Prefixes......................................................................................................................... 11 4.1.5. Affix Function............................................................................................................................... 11 5 WORD CLASSES................................................................................................................................12 5.1. LEXICAL ITEMS..................................................................................................................................... 12 5.1.1. The Verb....................................................................................................................................... 12 5.1.2. The Noun...................................................................................................................................... 18 5.1.3. The Adverb................................................................................................................................... 30 5.2. GRAMMATICAL ITEMS. ......................................................................................................................... 33 5.2.1. Conjunctions. ............................................................................................................................... 33 5.2.2. Prepositions. ................................................................................................................................ 38 6 THE PHRASE...................................................................................................................................... 42 6.1. NOUN PHRASES. ................................................................................................................................... 42 6.1.1. Head + Genitive Modifier............................................................................................................ 42 6.1.2. Head + Appositional Modifier..................................................................................................... 42 6.1.3. Head + Verbal Modifier. ............................................................................................................. 43 6.2. PREPOSITIONAL PHRASES. .................................................................................................................... 43 6.3. ADVERBIAL PHRASES ..........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • THE KHMER INSCRIPTIONS of TENASSERIM : a REINTERPRETATION by Michael Vickery
    THE KHMER INSCRIPTIONS OF TENASSERIM : A REINTERPRETATION by Michael Vickery These four short inscriptions were discovered in 1954 and were published in 1965 by Prof. George Coedes who interpreted them as diplomas conferring rank or titles. ' They are dated 1384-1388 s·aka corresponding to 1462-1466 A.D., and all of them contain the titles, in full or in part, of the king who was responsible for them. In Coedes' opinion these titles cannot refer to the king ruling at Ayutthaya because ~t that time the ruler was Paramatrai1okanatha, and in any case, according to Coedes, the Khmer language was unlikely to have been used for Ayutthayan inscriptions, "carle Cambodge et sa langue n'avaient aucune raison de jouir d'un pareil prestige". 2 He concluded that the Tenasserim inscriptions must have been due to a Cambodian prince and explained his presence at Tenasserim by a Thai invasion of Cambodia during which t wo of that country's princes were taken to Ayutthaya. 3 Further evidence supporting this view was the fact that the royal title in the Tenasserim inscriptions, according to Coedes, is "presque identique" to tba t of the Khmer king who had the bas-reliefs of Angkor Vat completed in the period between 1546 and 1564. 4 Since then Prof. 0 . Wolters has written about the Cambodian chronicles of this period and has accepted these inscriptions as proof of Notes Transcription : For citations from inscriptions and pre-modern documents an d for the names of archeological sites I have used the system based on the Sanskrit value of the letters of the Thai and Cambodian alphabets as described, fo r T hai , by Coedes in Pra.chum Uwm.' l< sayam , Bangkok, 2467 ( 1924).
    [Show full text]
  • The Mon Language Editmj
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2013 The Mon language:recipient and donor between Burmese and Thai Jenny, Mathias Abstract: Mon is spoken in south Myanmar and parts of central and northern Thailand and has been in intense contact with its neighboring languages for many centuries. While Mon was the culturally and politically dominant language in the first millennium, its role was reduced to a local minority language first in Thailand, later in Myanmar. The different contact situations in which the Mon languagehas been between Thailand and Myanmar has led to numerous instances of language change. The influence has not been one-way, with Mon on the receiving end only, but Mon was also the source of restructuring in Burmese and Thai. The present paper attempts to trace some of the contact induced changes in the three languages involved. It is not always clear which language was the source of shared vocabulary and constructions, but in many cases linguistic and historical facts can be adduced to find answers. While Mon language use in Thailand is diminishing fast and Mon in this country is undergoing restructuring according to Thai patterns, in Myanmar Mon is actually still exerting influence on Burmese, albeit mostly on a local level in varieties spoken in Mon and Karen States. The contact between genetically and typologically very different languages as is the case here leads in many cases to linguistically interesting outcomes. Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-81044 Journal Article Accepted Version Originally published at: Jenny, Mathias (2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Aslian: Mon-Khmer of the Malay Peninsula
    1 Aslian: Mon-Khmer of the Malay Peninsula. James A. Matisoff University of California, Berkeley Depending from the Southeast Asian mainland like “a long-necked bottle or an Indian club,”1 the Malay Peninsula lies in tropical splendor, separated from the island of Sumatra by the peaceful tidal waters of the Strait of Malacca. In the geological past, before the sinking of the Sunda Shelf, the west (‘Selangor’) coast of Malaya and the east coast of Sumatra were in fact connected by land—and at an even earlier period the two coastlines must have fit neatly together like pieces of a jigsaw puzzle (see Map 1). * This monograph was originally written in 1982-83, almost twenty years ago now, with the intention of incorporating it into the Mon-Khmer chapter of my long-suffering book, Languages of Mainland Southeast Asia. This book, to be published eventually in the Language Surveys series (familiarly know as the “green books”) by Cambridge University Press, is still far from completion, but will hopefully appear sometime during the 21st century. Meanwhile it has become clear that this study of the Aslian branch of Mon-Khmer is far too long and detailed to serve merely as part of a single chapter of a general book on Southeast Asian languages. However, in view of the fact that no other overall treatment of the Aslian languages has appeared in the past 20 years, perhaps the time has come to publish it separately. Since I am certainly no specialist in Mon-Khmer, I have obviously had to rely on the true masters of the field, especially the works of the two preeminent Aslianists, Gérard Diffloth and Geoffrey Benjamin, both of whom have been kind enough to approve of my attempts to summarize their research.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rhyme in Old Burmese Frederic Pain
    Towards a panchronic perspective on a diachronic issue: the rhyme in Old Burmese Frederic Pain To cite this version: Frederic Pain. Towards a panchronic perspective on a diachronic issue: the rhyme in Old Burmese. 2014. hal-01009543 HAL Id: hal-01009543 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01009543 Preprint submitted on 18 Jun 2014 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. PRE-PRINT VERSION | 1 TOWARDS A PANCHRONIC PERSPECTIVE ON A DIACHRONIC ISSUE: THE RHYME <<----UIW>UIW> IN OLD BURMESE Pain Frederic Academia Sinica, Institute of Linguistics — Taipei Laboratoire Langues et Civilisations à Tradition Orale — Paris1 1.1.1. Theoretical background: PanchronPanchronyy and "Diahoric" StudiesStudies This paper aims at introducing to the panchronic perspective based on a specific problem of historical linguistics in Burmese. Its purpose is to demonstrate that a diachrony is not exclusively indicative of systemic internal contingencies but also a medium through which a socio-cultural situation of the past surfaces. In this sense, I will argue that both internal and external factors of a specific diachrony belong to both obverses of a same panchronic coin and that a combined analysis of both diachronic factors generates powerful explanatory models.
    [Show full text]
  • Brāhmaṇa As an Honorific in 'Indianized' Southeast Asia. a Linguistic Approach
    Brāhmaṇa as an honorific in ’Indianized’ Southeast Asia. A Linguistic Approach Frederic Pain To cite this version: Frederic Pain. Brāhmaṇa as an honorific in ’Indianized’ Southeast Asia. A Linguistic Approach. 2014. hal-01009585 HAL Id: hal-01009585 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01009585 Preprint submitted on 18 Jun 2014 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. PRE-PRINT VERSION | 1 """B"BBBRĀHMARĀHMARĀHMAṆṆṆṆAAAA"""" ASASAS AN HONORIFIC INININ ‘I‘I‘INDIANIZED‘INDIANIZEDNDIANIZED’’ MAINLAND SSSOUTHEASTSOUTHEAST ASIA A LINGUISTIC APPROACH111 Frédéric Pain Academia Sinica (Institute of Linguistics, Taipei) KULeuven (Belgium) – LACITO (France) With the editorial assistance of Jonathan Evans, Academia Sinica Abstract. This article demonstrates that the Old Khmer b/vraḥ originates from a syllabic reduction of Sanskrit brāhmaṇa via monosyllabization, a widespread diachronic phenomenon among the Mon-Khmer languages of Mainland Southeast Asia and will show that this term must have been originally used as an honorific for deities and, consequently for royalty. We then respectfully disagree with two other current hypotheses explaining the etymology of this word, that is b/vraḥ is an autochthonous Mon-Khmer word or, according to the second hypothesis, that b/vraḥ originates in the Sanskrit/ Pāli word vara- "excellent, splendid, noble".
    [Show full text]
  • Mon-Khmer Studies
    Mon-Khmer Studies Volume 41 Author: Michel FERLUS Title: Linguistic evidence of the trans-peninsular trade route from North Vietnam to the Gulf of Thailand (3rd-8th centuries) Pages:10-19. Date Received: 25/10/2012 Revised Text Accepted: 12/12/2012 Copyright for this paper vested in the author Released under Creative Commons Attribution License Volume 41 Editors: Paul Sidwell Brian Migliazza ISSN: 0147-5207 Website: http://mksjournal.org Published by: Mahidol University (Thailand) SIL International (USA) Linguistic evidence of the trans-peninsular trade route from North Vietnam to the Gulf of Thailand (3rd-8th centuries) * Michel FERLUS Independent researcher (retired, National Center for Scientific Research , France) Abstract By the period of 3rd-8th centuries, an ancient land trade route linked North Vietnam to the Gulf of Thailand. The circulation of traders and travelers along this route has left cultural and linguistic influences of Ancient China as well as Ancient Vietnam (under Chinese rule) through the Khmer area. (1) Some Chinese words, few but highly significant, were borrowed into Khmer, and later passed in Thai, (2) The names of animals of the duodenary cycle in Ancient Vietnamese were borrowed by the Khmer and are still used today, and (3) The syllabic contrast /Tense ~ Lax/ of Middle Chinese was transferred, with various effects, in Vietic, and thence in Katuic and Pearic. This study is yet another example of the fruitfulness of interdisciplenary cooperation in the social science fields, here between linguistics and history. Keywords: phonetic history, borrowing, language contact ISO 639 Language codes: cmn, cog, khm, tha, pcb 1. Introduction Ancient Chinese texts that tell us about the period from the 3rd to the 8th century led to suppose the existence of a land route joining the Chinese protectorate of Chiao-chih ( Giao Chỉ, Northern Vietnam) to the Gulf of Thailand, a route which avoided the dangers of the maritime route.
    [Show full text]
  • KUAY in CAMBODIA a Vocabulary with Historical Comments
    KUAY in CAMBODIA a vocabulary with historical comments Gérard DIFFLOTH KUAY in CAMBODIA, a vocabulary with historical comments. by Prof. Gérard DIFFLOTH, Siem Reap, Cambodia FOREWORD There are many languages spoken in Cambodia today. Some are relatively new arrivals, others have been here for many centuries. The Kuay language belongs to the latter category. It is spoken natively in seven provinces of the country, and this book suggests that it has been in contact with the Khmer language at least since Angkorian times and probably even before that. There are also Kuay-speaking communities outside Cambodia, North of the Dangrek. Kuay is therefore an important regional language, and we need to understand its place in the ancient history of the country. Unfortunately, there are very few studies of the Kuay language, and it has remained little known to the general public and to scholarship until quite recently. The present book is a new and original contribution to this neglected field of study. It is not the definitive and final book on the Kuay language, but, as the author himself says, it is just an invitation for others to continue studying it. But behind this modest facade, the reader will discover that this author is a very knowledgeable scholar in the field of Austroasiatic language studies. The book is presented as a vocabulary, a list of some interesting words of the Kuay lan- guage. In each entry of this vocabulary, the reader will find first the pronunciation of the word in five varieties of Kuay spoken in different parts of Cambodia.
    [Show full text]
  • Sukhothai and Ayutthaya Pittayawat Pittayaporn1 Sireemas Maspong2 Shinnakrit Tangsiriwattanakul3 Yanyong Sikharit4
    The genetic relationship between the Thai language of Sukhothai and Ayutthaya Pittayawat Pittayaporn1 Sireemas Maspong2 Shinnakrit Tangsiriwattanakul3 Yanyong Sikharit4 Chulalongkorn University1, 3, Cornell University2, Srinakharinwirot University4 Medieval Tai languages Kingdoms Oldest inscriptions Dates Sukhothai Bang Sanuk Inscription 1339 Tin Inscription of Ayutthaya Wat Maha That 1374 Lan Na Lan Thong Kham Inscription 1376 Lan Xang Nang An Inscription 14th century Sadiya Snake-Pillar Ahom 1497-1537 Inscription Bang Sanuk Inscription (1339) Tin Inscription of Wat Maha That (1374) Sukhothai and Ayutthaya 1238 AD The first king of Sukhothai King Sri Indraditya began the Phra Ruang Dynasty 1350 AD The first king of Ayutthaya King Ramathibodi I began the Uthong Dynasty 1438 AD Merger into Ayuthaya Kingdom 1767 AD The fall of Ayutthaya Kingdom Mother-Daughter or Cousins? Proto-Southwestern Tai Proto-Southwestern Tai Sukhothai Sukhothai Ayutthaya Ayutthaya Proposal • The Thai varieties attested in Sukhothai and Ayutthaya inscriptions are in fact the same language • Shared phonological innovations • Shared chronology Outline • Historical background • Previous phonological study of Sukhothai Thai (SKT) and Ayutthaya Thai (AYT) • Early phonological innovations • Later innovations • SKT-AYT as Old Thai Historical background Foundation of Sukhothai and Ayutthaya • SWT speakers must have arrived in present-day Thailand by the middle of the 12th century as attested by bas-reliefs in Angkor Wat (Coedès 1968; Phumisak 1976) • A coalition of Thai
    [Show full text]
  • Historie Routes to Angkor: Development of the Khmer Road System (Ninth to Thirteenth Centuries AD) in Mainland Southeast Asia Mitch Hendrickson*
    Historie routes to Angkor: development of the Khmer road system (ninth to thirteenth centuries AD) in mainland Southeast Asia Mitch Hendrickson* Road systems in the service of empires have long inspired archaeologists and ancient historians alike. Using etymology, textual analysis and Angkor archaeology the author deconstructs the road system of the Khmer, empire builders of early historic Cambodia. Far from being the creation of one king, the road system evolved organically to serve expeditions, pilgrimages Phnom . Penh ù <> and embedded exchange routes over several i centuries. The paper encourages us to regard road networks as a significant topic, worthy of comparative study on a global scale. N 0 ^ 200 Keywords: Cambodia, Khmer, roads, routes, communications Ancient road systems: context and methods of study Investigating the chronology of road systems is complicated by their frequent reuse over long time periods and because they are comprised of multiple archaeological components that range from site to regional scales (e.g. roads, resting places, crossing points, settlements, ceramics). The archaeologist studying road systems must identify and incorporate a variety of available data sets, including historic information, within a framework of operational principles that characterise state-level road building and use. Recent trends in the study of imperial states focus on socio-cultural issues, such as pov^'er and politico-economic organisation (see D'Altroy 1992; Sinopoli 1994; Morrison 2001) and concepts of boundaries ' Department of Archaeology. University af Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia (Email: [email protected]) Received: 28 Au^t 2009; Revised: ¡3 October 2009: Accepted: 12 January 2010 ANTlQUITy84 (2010): 480-496 http://antiquiiy.ac.uk/ant/84/ant840480.htni 480 Mitch Hendrickson (see Morrison 2001; Smith 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • Schooltime Study Guide
    2011–2012 SEASON SchoolTime Study Guide Cambodia’s Khmer Arts Ensemble The Lives of Giants Monday, October 3, 2011 at 11 a.m. Zellerbach Hall, University of California, Berkeley Welcome to SchoolTime On Monday, October 3 at 11am, your class will attend a performance of Cambodia’s Khmer Arts Ensemble at Cal Performances’ Zellerbach Hall. Cambodia’s Khmer Arts Ensemble is renowned for performing dazzling, powerful works that dramatically expand the repertory of Cambodian dance. In The Lives of Giants, the company of 36 dancers, instrumentalists, and singers combine gestural dance, traditional music and spectacular costumes and staging to bring to life the ancient tale of a power-drunk and vengeful giant who wreaks havoc in the kingdom of heaven.. Using This Study Guide You can use this study guide to engage your students and enrich their Cal Performances field trip. Before attending the performance, we encourage you to: • Copy the Student Resource Sheet on pages 2 & 3 and give it to your students several days before the show. • Discuss the information on pages 4-6 About the Performance & Artists with your students. • Read to your students from About the Art Form on pages 7-10 and About Cambodia on pages 11-14. • Engage your students in two or more Activities on pages 15 & 16. • Reflect with your students by asking them Guiding Questions, found on pages 2, 4, 7 and 11. • Immerse students further into the subject matter and art form by using the Additional Resources on pages 16-17. At the performance: Your class can actively participate during the performance by: • Listening carefully to the rhythms, melodies and harmonies of the music • Observing how the dancers tell a story and express ideas and emotions through their movements • Thinking about the culture, traditions and history expressed through the dance and music • Marveling at the skill of the dancers, musicians and singers • Reflecting on the sounds, sights, and performance skills you experience at the theater.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Thai Alphabet Written Script, Elaborate Style
    THAI CULTURE NEW SERIES NO.10 THE NATURE AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE THAI LANGUAGE BY PHYA ANUMAN RAJADHON PUBLISHED BY THE FINE ARTS DEPARTMENT BANGKOK, THAILAND B.E. 2558 Preface Thailand is very rich in precious arts and cultural heritage which represents a long-lasting independence, prosperity and stability of the country. These various fields of heritage have been preserved, accumulated and inherited throughout generations until the present. This legacy brings pride, dignity and prestige to Thai people. Therefore, it should be shared with the world so that Thai wisdom can be appreciated. The Fine Arts Department is responsible for the preservation, promotion, transmission and dissemination of arts and culture of the Thai nation. As such it has compiled and published a book series of 25 volumes written by experts in their respective fields. Their areas of knowledge include artistic works, architecture, music and dramatic arts as well as language and literature. Each series has been reprinted from time to time. In this publication, there are no alterations to the contents although some illustrations have been added for the benefit of the readers. The Department hopes that this series of books will be a resource among the international community to help them understand Thailand better EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD through its unique arts and culture. Mr. Borvornvate Rungrujee Director General of the Fine Arts Department Mr. Pirapon Pisnupong Deputy Director General of the Fine Arts Department Mrs. Sunisa Chitrbhandh Deputy Director General of the Fine Arts Department Mr. Sahabhum Bhumtitterat Deputy Director General of the Fine Arts Department Mr. Boonteun Srivorapot Director of the Office of Literature and History Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Thai-Cambodian Culture Relationship ------10
    ThaiThai -- CambodianCambodian CultureCulture RelationshipRelationship thrthroughough ArtsArts Mrs Charuwan Phungtian HAN DD ET U 'S B B O RY eOK LIBRA E-mail: [email protected] Web site: www.buddhanet.net Buddha Dharma Education Association Inc. 2 3 4 Preface I got the inspiration to take up this thesis “Thai- Cambodian Culture relationship through arts” at the time I used to work in the camp with the S.E.A. refugees to resettle their lives in America. I worked with the “Consortium” organization under the administrative of UNHCR. The camp was at Phanat Nikhom, Chonburi, Thailand. I had good social relationship with all of my refugee students in the camp with all clans, tribes and countries. Especially for the Khmers, I learnt Khmer language and Khmer dance. I was fascinated with their arts so much. Apart from this, I took my Ph.D. topic from one part of my previous M.A. thesis “Some aspect of Buddhist arts in Thailand”. Its chapter “Lopburi art” helped me very much to make further studies on details of my present work on this Ph.D. thesis. I am proud of my work and give very much gratitude and my thanks to many persons. I must express my thanks and my gratitude to my re- spected supervisor Professor Dr. Sahai Sachchidanand, Head of the Department of Ancient Indian and Asian Studies, Magadh University, Bodh-Gaya, Bihar (India) who very kindly allowed me to take up this thesis. Besides, he with full attention pours out his scholarship and his knowledge and gave me the benefit of many sug- gestions for my Ph.D.
    [Show full text]