DOCSLIB.ORG

Atlanta Beltline/Atlanta Streetcar System Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Atlanta Beltline/Atlanta Streetcar System Plan An aspirational plan for streetcar investments for the City of Atlanta. December 2015 A t l a n t a S t r e e t c a r System Plan This page intentionally left blank. A t l a n t a S t r e e t c a r System Plan Acknowledgements The Honorable Mayor Kasim Reed Atlanta City Council Atlanta BeltLine, Inc. Staff Ceasar C. Mitchell, President Paul Morris, FASLA, PLA, President and Chief Executive Officer Carla Smith, District 1 Benjamin Limmer, AICP, Transportation Director Kwanza Hall, District 2 Marcus Arnold, AICP, Senior Transit Project Ivory Lee Young, Jr., District 3 Manager Cleta Winslow, District 4 Beth McMillan, Community Planning & Natalyn Mosby Archibong, District 5 Engagement Director Alex Wan, District 6 Lynnette Reid, Senior Community Planner Howard Shook, District 7 James Alexander, Housing Policy & Development Yolanda Adrean, District 8 Director Felicia A. Moore, District 9 City of Atlanta Staff C.T. Martin, District 10 Keisha Lance Bottoms, District 11 Kristin Wilson, Interim Chief Operating Officer Office of the Mayor Joyce Sheperd, District 12 Tim Keane, Commissioner, Department of Planning Michael Julian Bond, Post 1 at Large & Community Development Mary Norwood, Post 2 at Large Charletta Wilson Jacks, Director of Planning, Andre Dickens, Post 3 at Large Department of Planning & Community Atlanta BeltLine, Inc. Board Development Jonathan Lewis, AICP, Assistant Director of Planning The Honorable Kasim Reed, Mayor, City of Atlanta – Transportation, Department of Planning & John Somerhalder, Chairman Community Development Elizabeth B. Chandler, Vice Chair Invest Atlanta Earnestine Garey, Invest Atlanta Appointee Craig Richard, President and Chief Executive Officer Cynthia Briscoe Brown, Atlanta Board of Education, District 8 At Large C. Courtney Knight, Managing Director of Redevelopment The Honorable Joan Garner, Fulton County Board of Commissioners, District 4 The Honorable Andre Dickens, Atlanta City Councilmember, Post 3 At Large R. Charles Shufeldt, Atlanta BeltLine Partnership Appointee Cathy Woolard, Community Representative to the Board Acknowledgements | i A t l a n t a S t r e e t c a r System Plan Stakeholder Advisory Committee Michael Hunter, Georgia Institute of Technology Steve Klein, The King Center Ashley Robbins, Citizens for Progressive Transit Lauren Cardoni, University of Georgia - Athens Yvette Bowden, Piedmont Park Conservancy Ayana Gabriel, Westview Community Orginization Helen Butler, Coalition for the Peoples' Agenda Michael Hoath, Brand Properties Ray Christman, Livable Communities Coalition Carry Burgess, Zoo Atlanta Timothy Trefzer, Georgia World Congress Center Authority Technical Advisory Committee Christy Peterson, Georgia World Congress Center David Emory, Atlanta Regional Commission Authority Kirk Fjelstul, Georgia Regional Transportation Christina Skowronski, Centennial Park Authority Authority Holly Snow, Piedmont Healthcare Craig Camuso, CSX Transportation Abigail Paine, Park Pride Joel Harrell, Norfolk Southern Railway Company Penelope Mcphee, The Blank Foundation Kerima Hayes, Georgia Transit Association Jana Miles, Grant Park Conservancy Johnny Dunning, Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Ed McBrayer, Path Foundation Transit Authority (MARTA) Ronald Brewster, Citizen Keith Melton, Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Theodore Williams, Citizen Region 4 Bakari Brooks, Atlanta Housing Authority (AHA) Alan Ware, Georgia Department of Transportation Angela Renfroe, Atlanta Board of Education (GDOT) Major Hagin (Lt Durrant), Atlanta Police Rebecca Gutowsky, Cobb County Transit Department (APD) Phil Boyd, Gwinnett County Transit Steve Luxenberg, Federal Highway Administration Jennifer Giersch, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) (FHWA) Ryan Mahoney, Georgia Chamber of Commerce Richard Cogswell, Federal Railroad Administration Jeff Mann, National Railroad Passenger Corp. (FRA) (AMTRAK) Ntale Kajumba, U.S. Environmental Protection Pamela Papner, Virginia Highland Civic Association Agency (EPA) William Prescott, Atlanta Police Department (APD) Chuck Young, Atlanta Housing Authority (AHA) Dan Hourigan, Midtown Alliance Richard Mendoza, City of Atlanta Department of Angie Laurie, Central Atlanta Progress (CAP) Public Works (DPW) Dave Williams, Metro Atlanta Chamber of Scott Lee, GDOT District 7 Commerce Regan Hammond, Atlanta Regional Commission - Denise Starling, Buckhead Area Transportation Transportation Division Management Association (BATMA) Terry Lawler, Regional Business Coalition Cletta Rowden, West End Mall Jason Crane, GDOT – Planning Stefanie McCaster, Atlantic Station Aaron Fowler, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Sherry Turner, Atlanta University Center Consortium Gary Ulicny, Shepherd Center Christine Arato, National Park Service (NPS) Acknowledgements | ii A t l a n t a S t r e e t c a r System Plan Table of Contents Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................................................... i Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................................................... iii List of Tables .............................................................................................................................................................. iv List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................................. iv Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................ E-1 SECTION 1: Introduction .............................................................................................................................................1 SECTION 2: Transit in Atlanta .....................................................................................................................................3 2.1 Population, Employment, and Development Trends ......................................................................................3 2.2 Regional Transit Context .................................................................................................................................4 2.3 Chronology of Transit Plans/Studies/Initiatives ..............................................................................................4 2.3.1 Influence of the 2012 Transportation Investment Act .............................................................................4 2.4 Integrating Atlanta BeltLine Transit and the Atlanta Streetcar ............................................................................6 2.4.1 The Atlanta BeltLine ....................................................................................................................................6 2.4.2 The Atlanta BeltLine Transit Vision .............................................................................................................6 2.4.3 The Connect Atlanta Plan Transit Vision .....................................................................................................7 2.4.4 Concept3 Regional Transit Vision ...............................................................................................................9 2.4.5 The Atlanta Streetcar Project ......................................................................................................................9 SECTION 3: Planning Process ................................................................................................................................... 12 3.1 Guiding Principles......................................................................................................................................... 12 3.2 Community Engagement Process Overview ................................................................................................ 12 3.3 Guidance for Future Expansion .................................................................................................................... 14 SECTION 4: Atlanta Streetcar System Plan, Operations, Costs and Potential Funding ........................................... 15 4.1 Atlanta Streetcar System Plan...................................................................................................................... 15 4.1.1 Priority Streetcar System ....................................................................................................................... 15 4.1.2 Connected Transit System ..................................................................................................................... 15 4.2 Improving Connectivity ................................................................................................................................ 17 4.3 Conceptual Operating Plan .......................................................................................................................... 17 4.3.1 Operational Scenarios ........................................................................................................................... 17 4.3.2 Interface with MARTA Rail and Bus Services ......................................................................................... 18 Table of Contents | iii A t l a n t a S t r e e t c a r System Plan 4.3.3 Vehicle Maintenance and Storage Facility ............................................................................................ 20 4.4 Costs
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wayside Noise of Elevated Rail Transit Structures: Analysis of Published Data and Supplementary Measurements
    HE )8# 5 ORT NO. UMTA-MA-06-0099-80-6 . A3 7 no. DOT- TSC- UMTA- 3n-4i WAYSIDE NOISE OF ELEVATED RAIL TRANSIT STRUCTURES: ANALYSIS OF PUBLISHED DATA AND SUPPLEMENTARY MEASUREMENTS Eric E. Unger Larry E. Wittig TRJ < of A , DECEMBER 1980 INTERIM REPORT DOCUMENT IS AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC THROUGH THE NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICE, SPRINGFIELD, VIRGINIA 22161 Prepared for U,S, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RESFARCH AND SPECIAL PROGRAMS ADMINISTRATION Transportation Systems Center Cambridge MA 02142 x . NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Govern- ment assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof NOTICE The United States Government does not endorse pro- ducts or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers' names appear herein solely because they are con- sidered essential to the object of this report. i Technical Report Documentation Page 1 . Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. UMTA-MA- 0 6-0099-80-6 4.^Jitle and Subtitle 5. Report Date WAYSIDE NOISE OF ELEVATED RAIL TRANSIT December 1980 STRUCTURES: ANALYSIS OF PUBLISHED DATA 6. Performing Organization Code AND SUPPLEMENTARY MEASUREMENTS DTS-331 8. Performing Organization Report No. 7. Author's) DOT-TSC-UMTA-80- 41 linger, Eric E.; Wittig, Larry E. 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) UM049/R0701 Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc.* Moulton Street 11. Contract or Grant No. 50 DOT-TSC Cambridge MA 02238 -1531 13. Type of Report and Period Covered 12 U.S. Department of Transportation Interim Report Urban Mass Transportation Administration July 1978-Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • The Las Vegas Monorail, an Innovative Solution for Public Transportation Problems Within the Resort Corridor
    UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones 4-1999 The Las Vegas Monorail, an innovative solution for public transportation problems within the resort corridor Cam C. Walker University of Nevada Las Vegas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/thesesdissertations Part of the Public Administration Commons Repository Citation Walker, Cam C., "The Las Vegas Monorail, an innovative solution for public transportation problems within the resort corridor" (1999). UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones. 198. http://dx.doi.org/10.34917/1439111 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Monorail 1 THE LAS VEGAS MONORAIL, AN INNOVATIVE SOLUTION The Las Vegas Monorail: An Innovative Solution for Public Transportation Problems within the Resort Corridor By Cam C. Walker Bachelor of Science Brigham Young
    [Show full text]
  • Southern California Rapid Transit District (SCRTD)
    Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Law ---------------------------------------------------------------------- With corresponding provisions of the Southern California Rapid Transit District Law and Los Angeles County Transportation Commission Law Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority California Public Utilities Code Page 2 of 110 Introduction The Southern California Rapid Transit District, also known as the SCRTD or the “District” (1964-1993) was created by the State as the successor to the Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit Authority or “LAMTA” (1958-1964). LAMTA was the first publicly governed transit operator in Los Angeles and also responsible for the planning of a new mass transit system to replace the aging remnants of the transit systems built by Pacific Electric (1899-1953) and Los Angeles Railway (1895-1945). Unfortunately, the LAMTA had no ability to raise tax revenues or powers of eminent domain, and its board was appointed by the Governor, making the task building local support for mass transit improvements difficult at best. Dissatisfaction with the underpowered LAMTA led to a complete re-write of its legislative authority. While referred to in state legislation as a merger, the District law completely overwrote the LAMTA Act of 1957. The Los Angeles County Transportation Commission, also known as LACTC or the “Commission” (1977-1993) was created by the State in 1976 as a separate countywide transportation planning agency, along with transportation commissions in San Bernardino, Riverside, and Orange counties. At the time the District was initially created, there were no transit or transportation grant programs available from the State or Federal governments. Once funding sources became available from the Urban Mass Transit Administration, now the Federal Transit Administration, the California Transportation Commission, and others, the creation of county transportation commissions ensured coordination of multimodal transportation planning and funding programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Southside Trail Design July 12, 2016
    // Southwest + Southeast Study Group: Southside Trail Design July 12, 2016 7/12/2016 Page 1 // Trails: Southside Corridor • Includes 4-mile trail between University Ave & Glenwood Ave • Design to include lighting, retaining walls, vertical connections, storm drainage, signage/wayfinding, and bridges • Federally Funded Project, following GDOT Design Process • Design to be complete in 18-24 months followed by construction 7/12/2016 Page 2 MECHANICSVILLE LEGEND EDY PUBLIC LIBRARY I - 20 NODE OPTIONS ENN FULTON WAY GLENWOOD AVE SE WAY DUNBAR GLENWOOD ELEMENTARY PARK L K VERTICAL CONNECTION SCHOOL BILL KENNEDY BILL KENNEDY BIL ROSA L BURNEY SOUTHSIDE TRAIL AT GRADE PARK HERITAGE PARK MAYNARDD CONNECTION TO ATLANTA JACKSON BELTLINE COORIDOR H.S. PHOENIX III PARK|SCHOOL|LIBRARY| PARK WINDSOR GREENSPACE STREET GRANT PARK MERCER ST SE KILLIANKKILLIKILLKIL IANAN TO FOCUS AREA PHOENIX II PARK PARKSIDEARKSIDE ELEMENELEMENTARYTA ORMEWORMEORMEWOODRMEWWOODODOD PARK SCHOOL BROWN ORMEWOODWOOD AVEE MIDDLE WELCH ORMEWOODOORORMEWOOMEWOOD SCHOOL STREET PARK PARKPARK ROSE CIRCLE ADAIR DELMAR AVE SESE DELMARDELMDEDELLMAMAR PARK PARK II ORMOND AVEAVENUEENUENUNUE CHARLES L GRANT GIDEONS PARK ELEMENTARY VARD SE SCHOOL GGRANTRANT PPARKARK PPEOPLESEOPLES TTOWNOWN SE AVE CHEROKEE BOULEVARD SE BOULEVARD PITMAN SE BOULEVARD LEE ST AADAIRDAIR D.H. STANTON PARK E CCONFEDERATECONFEDE AVE SE I - 75 ELEMENTARY O PPARKARK PPITTSBURGHITTSBURGH SCHOOL RAATE AVE SE OOAKLANDAKLAND FOUR D.H. STANTON CORNERS WALTER LEONARD PARK PARK HILL ST SE CCITYITY ADAIR PARKS MIDDLE PARK I JACCIJAC FULLER ALLENE AVE SW ALLENE AVE SCHOOL WOODLAND GARDEN BBOULEVARDOULEVARD PARK METROPOLITAN PKWY METROPOLITAN BOULEVARD HANK AARON DR SE HANK AARON CCHOSEWOODHOSEWOOD HHEIGHTSEIGHTS CARVER D.H. CROSSING SCHOOLS FINCH UNIVERSITY AVE MILTONSTANTON AVE SE PPARKARK PARK ELEMENTARY TO PARK SCHOOL MCDONOUGH BLVDO SE EENGLEWOODNGLEWOOD THE REV.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stepped Hull Hybrid Hydrofoil
    The Stepped Hull Hybrid Hydrofoil Christopher D. Barry, Bryan Duffty Planing @brid hydrofoils or partially hydrofoil supported planing boat are hydrofoils that intentionally operate in what would be the takeoff condition for a norma[ hydrofoil. They ofler a compromise ofperformance and cost that might be appropriate for ferq missions. The stepped hybrid configuration has made appearances in the high speed boat scene as early as 1938. It is a solution to the problems of instability and inefficiency that has limited other type of hybrids. It can be configured to have good seakeeping as well, but the concept has not been used as widely as would be justified by its merits. The purpose of this paper is to reintroduce this concept to the marine community, particularly for small, fast ferries. We have performed analytic studies, simple model experiments and manned experiments, andfiom them have determined some specljic problems and issues for the practical implementation of this concept. This paper presents background information, discusses key concepts including resistance, stability, seakeeping, and propulsion and suggests solutions to what we believe are the problems that have limited the widespread acceptance of this concept. Finally we propose a “strawman” design for a ferry in a particular service using this technology. BACKGROUND Partially hydrofoil supported planing hulls mix hydrofoil support and planing lift. The most obvious A hybrid hydrofoil is a vehicle combining the version of this concept is a planing hull with a dynamic lift of hydrofoils with a significant amount of hydrofoil more or less under the center of gravity. lit? tiom some other source, generally either buoyancy Karafiath (1974) studied this concept and ran model or planing lift.
    [Show full text]
  • Woodland Ferry History
    Woodland Ferry: Crossing the Nanticoke River from the 1740s to the present Carolann Wicks Secretary, Department of Transportation Welcome! This short history of the Woodland Ferry, which is listed in the National Register of Historic Places, was written to mark the commissioning of a new ferryboat, the Tina Fallon, in 2008. It is an interesting and colorful story. TIMELINE 1608 Captain John Smith explores 1843 Jacob Cannon Jr. murdered at the the Nanticoke River, and encounters wharf. Brother Isaac Cannon dies one Nanticoke Indians. Native Americans month later. Ferry passes to their sister have resided in the region for thousands Luraney Boling of years 1845 Inventory of Luraney Boling’s 1734 James Cannon purchases a estate includes “one wood scow, one land tract called Cannon’s Regulation at schooner, one large old scow, two small Woodland old scows, one ferry scow, one old and worn out chain cable, one lot of old cable 1743? James Cannon starts operating a chains and two scow chains, on and ferry about the wharves” 1748 A wharf is mentioned at the 1883 Delaware General Assembly ferry passes an act authorizing the Levy Court of Sussex County to establish and 1751 James Cannon dies and his son maintain a ferry at Woodland Jacob takes over the ferry 1885 William Ellis paid an annual 1766 A tax of 1,500 lbs. of tobacco salary of $119.99 by Sussex County for is paid “to Jacob Cannon for keeping operating the ferry a Ferry over Nanticoke River the Year past” 1930 Model “T” engine attached to the wooden ferryboat 1780 Jacob Cannon dies and
    [Show full text]
  • The Atlanta Beltline: Creating a TOD Real Estate Market Pre-Transit
    //The Atlanta BeltLine: Creating a TOD Real Estate Market Pre-Transit NACTO 2012 Designing Cities Conference 10/23/2012 Confidential // Atlanta BeltLine // © 2012 Page 1 // Context The Atlanta BeltLine connects the heart of the region and utilizes historic freight rail ROW circling the city: • Located inside the I-285 loop highway • Connects 45 neighborhoods ringing the CBD • 22% of City of Atlanta population and 19% of city land mass within ½ mile of corridor 10/23/2012 Confidential // Atlanta BeltLine // © 2012 Page 2 // HistoryThe Project + Context Elements Providing the Region with Needed Connectivity •Economic Development •Transit •Brownfield cleanup •Affordable housing •Parks •Trails 10/23/2012 Confidential // Atlanta BeltLine // © 2012 Page 3 //The Project Elements Transit Parks Trails Jobs & Economic 22-mile loop 1300 + new acres, 33 miles Development 40% increase 20 areas, 30k jobs 6,500 acre TAD Affordable & Existing Public Art & Environmental Workforce Communities & Streetscapes Clean-up Housing Historic 1100 + acres Preservation 10/23/2012 Confidential // Atlanta BeltLine // © 2012 Page 4 // Case Study for Urban TOD Historic Fourth Ward / Poncey Highlands Redevelopment Historic Fourth Ward Park Site The old Sears Distribution Center next to the Atlanta BeltLine and lots of parking 10/23/2012 Confidential // Atlanta BeltLine // © 2012 Page 5 // Historic Fourth Ward & Poncey Highlands Existing Conditions “Buttermilk Bottom” Confluence of 3 watersheds Described by The Atlanta Journal Constitution as … “A barren expanse of cracked concrete, weeds, and towering trees surviving against a background of neglect.” 10/23/2012 Confidential // Atlanta BeltLine // © 2012 Page 6 // The Planning Process Led to Projects Atlanta BeltLine Master Plan Promote improved connectivity Promote denser development Promote improved livability 10/23/2012 Confidential // Atlanta BeltLine // © 2012 Page 7 // The Planning Process Led to Projects Historic Fourth Ward Park Vision and Construction 1 2 3 1.
    [Show full text]
  • MARTA Jurisdictional Briefing City of Atlanta
    MARTA Jurisdictional Briefing City of Atlanta March 27, 2019 Jeffrey A. Parker | General Manager/CEO AGENDA More MARTA Atlanta Program Update Systemwide Station Improvements Program Transit Oriented Development Update State of Service 2 MORE MARTA ATLANTA PROGRAM UPDATE MORE MARTA PLAN (ADOPTED OCT. 4, 2018) 4 WHERE ARE WE GOING? CoA Board MARTA BOARD BOARD Members APPROVAL ADOPTED Briefing PLAN Draft Final WE ARE Plan Plan Financial HERE MARTA Workshop Board Work Session OCT 2018 NOV 2018 DEC 2018 JAN 2019 FEB 2019 MAR 2019 APR 2019 MAY 2019 JUN 2019 REQUIRED FEEDBACK AT MILESTONES: MAR 2019 MAY 2019 TAC OCT 2018 – FEB 2019 –APR 2019 – JUN 2019 JPLG SCENARIO PLANNING & EVALUATION IMPLEMENTATION PLAN SAC PLAN APPROVAL MARTA/COA Executive Leadership 5 DEFINING THE MORE MARTA ATLANTA PROGRAM 2-STEP PROCESS Step 1: Narrowed list of projects from 73 to 16 Priority Projects Board approval October 2018 MORE MARTA INPUT RECEIVED FROM: PUBLIC COMMITTEES Step 2: Create a phasing plan and financial strategy Implementation plan Refine cash flow model Board approval June 2019 6 MORE MARTA ATLANTA STATION ENHANCEMENTS PROGRAM $200M allocated for station enhancements Initially allocated funds to improve 16 stations Focus on transformational changes at 3 priority stations o Five Points o Bankhead o Vine City Remaining 13 stations to be funded by current penny sales tax 7 LA BRT EDUCATION TOUR: MAY 1-3 • Purpose Local elected officials and decision makers to learn and experience LA Metro’s BRT system Collaborate and gather lessons learned
    [Show full text]
  • ATLANTA BELTLINE MASTER PLAN • July 18, 2011 SUBAREA 4 B
    I. Executive Summary The recommendations of the Atlanta BeltLine To better defi ne streetscape, pedestrian and Master Plan for Subarea 4 are summarized in the roadway projects and associated cost estimates following pages. The recommendations include for high priority corridors necessary to support brief sections on land use, design, mobility, and future development as identifi ed in the parks. Complete recommendations follow this Redevelopment Plan and Street Framework section in the Plan Recommendations Report. Plan. To refi ne projects and programming related to parks and open spaces along the BeltLine. a. Study Overview The Atlanta BeltLine will combine greenspace, Upon completion of all Subarea Master Plans, trails, transit, and new development along 22 miles Atlanta BeltLine Inc. will develop a comprehensive of historic rail segments that encircle the core of Implementation Plan and budget for projects the city. It will connect 45 neighborhoods and identifi ed and prioritized in individual subareas. affect more than 100,000 people who live within This phased process will ensure a uniform one-half mile of the corridor. approach to implementing projects and an equitable distribution of development across all In 2005, the Atlanta City Council adopted the geographies of the Atlanta BeltLine over time BeltLine Redevelopment Plan. This important – regardless of the sequencing of Subarea Master planning document created a broad vision for the Plans. Atlanta BeltLine project and enabled the creation of the BeltLine Tax Allocation District (TAD), a key Master Plans by their nature are subject to source of implementation funds. The Subarea 4 periodic review and changes to refl ect changing Master Plan builds on the foundation of previous local conditions, refi ned neighborhood visions and planning efforts by refi ning recommendations city policies, demographic shifts, and other factors.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 116 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 116 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 166 WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, DECEMBER 3, 2020 No. 204 House of Representatives The House met at 10 a.m. and was These are the people who walked in Doug Hartman, Karen Hasara, Holly called to order by the Speaker pro tem- parades; they helped pass out balloons, Healey, Brian Heckert, Bob pore (Mr. CUELLAR). candy, and political literature; they Hermsmeyer, Dennis Herrington, Nita f carried signs; they put up and took Hill, Mark and Elaine Hoffman, Nancy down political signs of all sizes; they Kimme, Bob Kjellander, Gwen Klinger, DESIGNATION OF SPEAKER PRO helped stuff mail and phone-bank; they Doug Knebel, Lynn Koch, Gale and Pat TEMPORE organized fundraisers, both big and Koelling, Greg Knott, J.C. Kowa, Kel- The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- small; they manned booths at county vin Kuneth, Keith and Judy Loemker, fore the House the following commu- fairs. Kay Long, Tom and Robin Long, Sen- nication from the Speaker: What causes people to give up their ator David Luechtefeld, Curt and Lu WASHINGTON, DC, time, their talents and possessions to a Maddox, Tony Marsh, Mark and Carol December 3, 2020. candidate, party, or cause? It is at the Mestemacher, Don and Joanne Metzler, I hereby appoint the Honorable HENRY heart of a representative democracy, Guy Michael, Tom and Robin Long. CUELLAR to act as Speaker pro tempore on our constitutional Republic. Kathy Lynch, Kathy Lydon, Andy this day.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Relations Manager Atlanta Streetcar
    CITY OF ATLANTA 55 TRINITY Ave, S.W Kasim Reed ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30335-0300 Sonji Jacobs Dade Mayor Director of Communications City of Atlanta TEL (404) 330-6004 City of Atlanta Public Relations Manager Atlanta Streetcar Title: Public Relations Manager Department: Atlanta Streetcar / Department of Public Works Supervisor: Tim Borchers, Executive Director, Atlanta Streetcar Interested candidates should submit a cover letter and resume to [email protected] no later than Friday, September 13, 2013 at 5:30 p.m. About the Atlanta Streetcar The Atlanta Streetcar is the first phase of a comprehensive, regional streetcar and transit system in the City of Atlanta and the region to address issues of transportation, land use, smart growth, and sustainability while providing last-mile connectivity to riders. The Atlanta Streetcar is a modern, ADA compliant, electrically powered transit system. The streetcar will run for 2.7 miles in the heart of Atlanta’s downtown, business, tourism and convention corridor connecting Centennial Olympic Park area with the vibrant Sweet Auburn and Edgewood Avenue districts. The Atlanta Streetcar project is a cooperative effort by the City of Atlanta, the Atlanta Downtown Improvement District (ADID) and MARTA. The streetcar will run through the heart of Atlanta's business, tourism and convention corridor, bringing jobs and new economic development to the city. Public Relations Manager Overview The Atlanta Streetcar seeks an energetic and articulate Public Relations Director for our press initiatives. The Public Relations Manager will be the primary spokesperson for the Atlanta Streetcar. S/he will work with our staff and partners to build and undertake communications strategies that keep the public informed on the construction and operation of the Streetcar.
    [Show full text]
  • Soohueyyap Capstone.Pdf (6.846Mb)
    School of City & Regional Planning COLLEGE OF DESIGN A Text-Mining and GIS Approach to Understanding Transit Customer Satisfaction Soo Huey Yap MS-GIST Capstone Project July 24, 2020 1 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Transit Performance Evaluation……………………………………………………………………………….. 3 1.2 Using Text-Mining and Sentiment Analysis to Measure Customer Satisfaction………… 5 2. METHODOLOGY 2.1 Study Site and Transit Authority……………………………………………………………………………….. 9 2.2 Description of Data…………………………………………………………………………………………………… 9 2.3 Text-Mining and Sentiment Analysis 2.3.1 Data Preparation……………………………………………………………………………………….. 11 2.3.2 Determining Most Frequent Words…………………………………………………………… 12 2.3.3 Sentiment Analysis……………………………………………………………………………………. 13 2.4 Open-Source Visualization and Mapping………………………………………………………………… 14 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 3.1 Determining Most Frequent Words………………………………………………………………………… 16 3.2 Sentiment Analysis…………………………………………………………………………………………………. 17 3.3 Location-based Analysis…………………………………………………………………………………………. 19 4. CHALLENGES AND FUTURE WORK……………………………………………………………………………………. 24 5. CONCLUSION………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….… 25 6. REFERENCES……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 26 7. APPENDICES……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 29 Appendix 1: Final Python Script for Frequent Words Analysis Appendix 2: Results from 1st Round Data Cleaning and Frequent Words Analysis Appendix 3: Python Script for Sentiment Analysis using the NLTK Vader Module Python Script for Sentiment Analysis using TextBlob Appendix 4:
    [Show full text]