February 2015

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

February 2015 Volume 43 • Number 2 • February 2015 Back to Sweet Home Chicago William T. Bielby, Vegas.) The Great Recession took suburbs. Gentrification continues inside University of Illinois, Chicago a toll on Chicago in the years since apace in every direction from the Come on we last met there. It is smaller, Loop, while leap frogging African Oh baby don’t you want to go experiencing a population loss of American communities. New immi- 3 COSSA Modernizes its Come on 200,000 between 2000 and 2010, grant gateways in the suburbs pro- Governance System Oh baby don’t you want to go and the recovery has been less vide new avenues for social mobility Back to that same old place robust than in other large cities. It for some, but poverty is growing The revision of the bylaws Sweet home Chicago is also more unequal than it was 13 faster in Chicago suburbs than in seeks to comply, streamline, years ago. Tremendous wealth has any other region of the state. and simplify. he Annual been generated Mayor Emanuel and the TMeeting was in the booming Neo-Liberal Turn 5 Connecting Students first held in technology and with Careers Chicago in 1919, professional and In 2011 Rahm Emanuel suc- and we’ve met at ceeded Richard Daley as mayor. That SUNY Potsdam professor financial services “that same old may or may not have been the end provides tips, suggestions, sectors, with pre- place” a total of of the Chicago machine domina- and resources to integrate dictable impacts 14 times, most tion of city politics, but it certainly into your sociology on wealth recently in 2002. marked a neoliberal turn. Rahm has department. concentra- (Chicago was tion, economic the well-earned nickname of “Mayor to have been the site of the 2011 vitality, and conspicuous con- 1%.” He grew up in the affluent Choosing ASA’s Slate of 5 meeting until labor issues at the sumption in the city’s affluent North Shore suburb of Wilmette and Candidates Hilton resulted in a move to Las neighborhoods and North Shore Continued on Page 8 Before names end up on the ballot there is a rigorous selection process. 7 Updating the U.S. Reflections on the Recipients Constitution as a Class Activity Charlie Hebdo Massacre of 2015 ASA Want to insert human rights Erik Olin Wright, University of killed 12 people. “What terrible Awards lessons into your classroom? Wisconsin-Madison events,” I wrote in my travel journal. Have students tackle he American Sociological n the second week of January 2015, I had heard of Charlie Hebdo, but updating the constitution. had not been aware of its place in TAssociation proudly announces II traveled to Paris to give a lecture the recipients of the major awards at a research institute and partici- France as a real political-cultural Get to Know ASA Staff institution: biting, irreverent satire, for 2015. These outstanding scholars 9 pate in a meeting of the scientific will be recognized at the 2015 Find out who is behind criticism through mockery. Some council of the International Panel Annual Meeting Awards Ceremony those e-mails and answering of the senior editors who were on Social Progress, a new orga- on Sunday, August 23, at 4:30 your questions. nization roughly modeled on the murdered were icons in the world of intellectuals in Paris. France, more p.m. The Awards Ceremony will Intergovernmental Panel on Climate immediately precede the formal Change. Its goal is to produce a than almost any other place I know of, reveres its serious intellectu- address of the ASA President Paula massive report on the global status England. All registrants are invited of progress on the many dimensions als. In addition to being a terrible loss, the political ramifications are to attend an Honorary Reception of social justice by 2017. The council immediately following the address consists of social scientists from also unsettling. In France right- wing forces have been gaining to congratulate President England around the world, including many and the award recipients. economists as well as some sociolo- strength around hyper-nationalist ideologies, and one of the ideologi- The ASA awards are conferred on From the Executive Officer .................2 gists. I had anticipated a typical, sociologists for outstanding publica- interesting academic trip; it turned cal anchors of this political current Science Policy .........................................3 is Islamophobia intertwined with tions and achievements in the schol- out to be much more intense than I arship, teaching, and the practice ASA Forum ............................................ 10 racism. These killings, and the imagined. of sociology. Award recipients are Announcements ................................. 10 I arrived in Paris the day after subsequent hostage situation that occurred while I was in Paris, are selected by committees appointed Obituaries .............................................. 14 two masked gunmen armed with likely to intensify this. by the ASA Committee on assault rifles forced their way into Committees and the ASA Council. the offices of the French satirical newspaper, Charlie Hebdo, and Continued on Page 6 Continued on Page 4 footnotes • February 2015 To view the online version, visit <www.asanet.org/footnotes/feb15/index.html> 1 American Sociological Association footnotes.asanet.org from the executive officer Communicating Social Science Let me tell you a story… few weeks ago, an ASA staff will be. We see this today in the triggers neurons in the brain that tists as social workers who are not Amember was telling me about debate surrounding the vaccination revive past experiences. A child scientists and not equal in stature to his recent trip to visit his in-laws. of children. reading the Harry Potter series is physical and life science researchers. They are semi-retired not merely reading about wizards However, even without overcoming What’s a scientist to snow birds who spend the going to school, rather they are the basic identity problem, once do? winter in the California reflecting on and learning about social science research is presented desert—basking in the Appealing to people’s good overcoming evil through reli- to the public beginning with a blue skies and warmth. His father emotions has been used ance on friendship, education, and metaphor or story the acceptance in-law is a successful entrepreneur to bludgeon political opponents— perseverance. Using Mar’s analysis level changes. with an advanced degree in the Presidents Reagan and George W. as a foundation, scientists should Sociological research can lead to physical sciences. While sitting on Bush were masters at this. (See consider “showing instead of telling” a better understanding of the world his porch, enjoying a drink, he told Drew Weston’s The Political Brain: when initiating a presentation based in which we live and the social my colleague about the ways of The Role of Emotion in Deciding the on their expertise. ramifications of human behavior. the world and defended as truths Fate of the Nation). Policies rooted This does not mean scientists It often leads scientists to argue numerous myths that have been in emotion, like mandatory mini- should consult with the university’s for social change. Arguing for debunked by scientists related to mum sentencing or drug testing Creative Writing Department prior social change, however, generates poverty, vaccines, climate change, welfare recipients, have become the to releasing research to the public. an emotional response from those etc. My colleague attempted to law across the country even though Ummm, well, maybe we should. many people in the society who fear refute his father in-law’s claims with scientific experts state that they are According to the FrameWorks change. As a result we often feel like research but this further strength- ineffective. Institute--a we are pulling an obstinate mule ened the father in-law’s insistence (You add to Washington, down a path. and only made the conversation this list.) scientists should consider DC, com- Moving forward more awkward. As his brief story Scientists “showing instead of telling” when munication in our nation’s Let’s consider new ways we can concluded, my colleague asked me, initiating a presentation based on think tank “Why is it that when I tried to use capitol often that designs, use our research and that commu- lament that their expertise. nicate scientific knowledge to the scientific fact to refute a myth, my conducts, and father in-law’s opinion became more there is a “war publishes com- public—incorporating narratives entrenched?” on science” and munications (i.e., stories!) or metaphors is likely that scientists research to further public under- to be just a start. Science isn’t accu- Been there, done that, you’ll (social scientists included) and their standing of social issues—simply mulated stories, but stories can help say expertise is not being heard. I would incorporating a metaphor into the frame scientific facts in meaningful We’ve all been there, and we argue that scientists are not losing description of one’s research can ways. If we do this we can be better know the answer (from research): a “war on science” rather they are help it be received better by the prepared for those conversations confirmation bias. In 1979, losing a communications war. public. For example, instead of on a desert porch, at a backyard Stanford University psycholo- So, how should scientists com- saying “recent research identifies barbeque, and at a holiday din- gists Charles Lord, Lee Ross, and municate? Scientists need to do why there is an increased recidivism ner, or for those policy discussions Mark Lepper (psycnet.apa.org/ a better job of separating their rate among felons in urban areas”, in the local government centers, psycinfo/1981-05421-001) showed professional identity from an issue a scientist might say “like the last state capital buildings, and during empirically that our beliefs shape they want to discuss.
Recommended publications
  • “State of Civil Society Report: 2015
    the year in review State of Civil Society report 2015: THE YEAR IN REVIEW ...these stories tell us that only civil introduction society, in its broadest sense, is taking a It has been another year of hard work and high achievement for civil society. The story of the year since the stance against the 2014 State of Civil Society Report was published has partly been one of a continuing series of attacks on civil concentration of society in the many countries where, when civil society asks difficult questions about power, the powerful seek to silence it. But is has also been a story of impressive and sustained civil society response, in a world that has power in the hands of become more turbulent and contested. a tiny, global, super- rich elite, and against As we show below, civil society faces challenges - of lack of space, under-resourcing and limited access to the attempts of many decision-makers. Civil society also needs continually to prove its connection with and relevance to citizens, political leaders and and it needs to demonstrate its ability to stay ahead of trends and innovate. When civil society groups do not corporate interests do these, they fail. But so often, we see civil society leading the response to crisis, taking on difficult issues, contributing to change, and winning arguments for social justice. to undermine human rights and This year in review section of the 2015 CIVICUS State of Civil Society Report is complemented by our report’s the value of people’s special thematic section on the resourcing for civil society, and the 27 guest contributions, from civil society participation.
    [Show full text]
  • Blasphemy, Charlie Hebdo, and the Freedom of Belief and Expression
    Blasphemy, Charlie Hebdo, and the Freedom of Belief and Expression The Paris attacks and the reactions rashad ali The horrific events in Paris, with the killing of a group of Other reactions highlight and emphasise the fact journalists, a Police officer, and members of the Jewish that Muslims are also victims of terrorism – often the community in France have shocked and horrified most main victims – a point which Charlie Hebdo made in commentators. These atrocities, which the Yemen branch an editorial of the first issue of the magazine published of the global terrorist group al-Qaeda have claimed the following the attack on its staff. Still others highlight responsibility for,1 have led to condemnations from that Jews were targeted merely because they were Jews.2 across the political spectrum and across religious divides. This was even more relevant given how a BBC journalist Some ubiquitous slogans that have arisen, whether appeared to suggest that there was a connection between Je suis Charlie, Ahmed, or Juif, have been used to show how “Jews” treated Palestinians in Israel and the killing of empathy with various victims of these horrid events. Jews in France in a kosher shop.3 These different responses illustrate some of the divides in The most notorious response arguably has not come public reaction, with solidarity shown to various camps. from Islamist circles but from the French neo-fascist For example, some have wished to show support and comedian Dieudonne for stating on his Facebook solidarity with the victims but have not wished to imply account “je me sens Charlie Coulibaly” (“I feel like Charlie or show support to Charlie Hebdo as a publication, Coulibaly”).
    [Show full text]
  • Je Suis Charlie?
    Je Suis Charlie? Why Positive Integration of Muslims in France Reinforces the Republican Ideal By Emmanuel Todd e can now say, with the benefit of hindsight, that in January 2015 France succumbed to an attack of hysteria. The massacre of the editorial board Wof the satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo, as well as of several police officers and the customers of a Jewish shop, triggered a collective reaction unprec - edented in our country’s history. It would have been impossible to discuss it in the heat of the moment. The media joined hands to denounce terrorism, to celebrate the admirable character of the French people, and to sacralize liberty and the French Republic. Charlie Hebdo and its caricatures of Mohammed were enshrined. The government announced that it was giving a grant to the weekly so that it could get back on its feet. Crowds of people followed the government’s appeal to march in protest throughout the land: they held pencils to symbolize press freedom and applauded the state security police and the marksmen posted on the rooftops. The logo “Je suis Charlie” (“I am Charlie”), written in white letters against a black background, could be seen everywhere: on our screens, in the streets, on restaurant menus. Children came home from school with a letter C written on their hands. Kids aged 7 and 8 were interviewed at the school gates and asked for their thoughts on the horror of the events and the importance of one’s freedom to draw caricatures. The government decreed that anyone who failed to toe the line would be punished.
    [Show full text]
  • The Right to Offend Will Not Tolerate Any Assault on Our Right to Open Expression, Which Is the Basis of a Free Society
    January 26, 2015 Enquiry Free thought and discourse A publication of the AHI Undergraduate Fellows Volume II | Issue XV secular society and an epidemic Charlie Hebdo of violent religious extremism in a Je suis Charlie Mike Adamo fanatically religious society. There’s Senior Editor not much that’s moderate, from our The tragic attack on the French Western perspective, about how Islam satirical newspaper Charlie Hebdo is commonly practiced in Muslim earlier in January was, in effect, an countries. In Iraq, according to a 2013 attack on free expression in the West Pew Research study, more than half by a strain of Islam that is far too of all Muslims favor stoning as the common. Charlie Hebdo is well known punishment for adultery. In Palestine, for its irreverent satirical treatment of 40 percent of Muslims say that attacks almost every religion and ideology in against civilians in defense of Islam are the world. The publication had already often or sometimes justified. Over 90% endured a bombing in 2011 for printing of Muslims in Iraq, Tunisia, Morocco, cartoons of Muhammad. This time, Indonesia, Malaysia, and Afghanistan two terrorists stormed the newspaper’s believe that a woman must obey her office, killing nine editors, a building husband in all cases whatsoever. worker, and two police officers. The These aren’t marginal populations. We message was clear: you do not get to have our own religious radicals in the exercise free speech when it comes to United States, but you won’t find many Islam. Christians who want to make Leviticus Islamists have some common global law.
    [Show full text]
  • Charlie Hebdo Massacre Today Was the Twitter Hashtag #Je- of Charles De Gaulle
    reader %6IEWSR4YFPMGEXMSR N .ERYEV] 8LI'LEVPMI,IFHS8VEKIH] 'SRINSXE`(VIEQWXMQIGSQ --22 8,-77-779) ª..IWYMW'LEVVPMI«# ::MSPIRRX6IWTTSRWIWXS3JJIRWMZI7TIIGL ,,EXI 7TIIGL 0E[W -WWPEQMMG7EXMVVI -WWPEQ4VSLMFFMX-QEKIWSJ1SLEQQIH# ;;LMXII,SYWI SR'LEVPPMI,IFHS JJ2544_Newsletter.indd2544_Newsletter.indd 1 11/14/15/14/15 33:04:04 PPMM ‘Je suis Charlie’? No, You’re Not, or Else You Might Be Dead &]1EXX;IPGL 3VMKMREPP]TYFPMWLIH.ERYEV] One of the spontaneous social-media reactions to the cal publication was shuttered for its disrespect at the funeral Charlie Hebdo massacre today was the Twitter hashtag #Je- of Charles De Gaulle. It frequently published stuff that most SuisCharlie (“I am Charlie”). It’s an admirable sentiment, journalists know, but are too afraid to stand by. resonant with the classic post-9/11 Le Monde cover “Nous The cartoonists who were killed today—Wolinski, Cabu, sommes tous Americains.” It’s also totally inaccurate. Tignous, Charb—were some of the most beloved figures If we—all of us, any of us—were Charlie Hebdo, here are in modern French life. Contra some of the nonsense being some of the things that we might do: mouthed today by fools on Twitter, these weren’t some kind * Not just print original satirical cartoons taking the piss of Andrew Dice Clay acts looking for ever-more vulnerable out of Islamic-terrorist sensibilities, but do so six days after minorities to kick; Cabu, for instance, is most famous for you were firebombed for taking the piss creating the provincial, typical-French out of Islamic-terrorist sensibilities, and character Mon Beauf, who he mocks for do so in such a way that’s genuinely fun- being crude and bigoted toward minori- ny (IMO) and even touching, with the ties.
    [Show full text]
  • Charlie Hebdo: an Analysis of the Framing of the Paris Attacks in Comparison with 9/11
    Charlie Hebdo: An Analysis of the Framing of the Paris Attacks in Comparison with 9/11. By Laura Scholte Student number: 4019563 Supervisor: S.J.Cook Date: 3-01-2016 2 Contents Introduction …………………………………………………………………………. 3 Method………………………………………………………………………………… American media response to 9/11………………………………………………… Framing theory………………………………………………………………………. Analysis of the framing of Charlie Hebdo…………………………………………… Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………….. References…………………………………………………………………………….. Appendix………………………………………………………………………………. 3 Introduction On January 7th 2015, two masked men forced their entry into the office of French satirical newspaper Charlie Hebdo and shot eight staff members. The victims were a group of four cartoonists, the editor and sub-editor of the magazine, one journalist and one columnist. Four others who were in the building at the time were also killed; that week’s guest-editor, an office caretaker, the editor’s bodyguard and a local policeman outside. Eleven others were severely injured. The reason behind the attack was the portrayal of the prophet Muhammad in an earlier issue of the newspaper. The men who carried out the assault claimed to belong to Islamist Terrorist group Al-Qaeda in Jemen and were shot by the police after a hostage situation outside of Paris. The news of the shooting spread rapidly through social media and live TV broadcasts. The Washington Post named it “France’s deadliest terrorist attack in modern memory (…)” (Witte and Faiola 2015) and U.S. President Obama’s speech on counter-terrorism and justice was quoted in many following articles. For many days after the shooting, the hashtag #CharlieHebdo was trending worldwide on Twitter. Many expressed their sympathies for the victims by changing their profile pictures to “Je suis Charlie” (I am Charlie), after the name of the newspaper.
    [Show full text]
  • The Multidirectional Memory of Charlie Hebdo
    The Multidirectional Memory of Charlie Hebdo Hollis-Touré, I. (2016). The Multidirectional Memory of Charlie Hebdo. French Cultural Studies, 27(3), 293-302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957155816648102 Published in: French Cultural Studies Document Version: Peer reviewed version Queen's University Belfast - Research Portal: Link to publication record in Queen's University Belfast Research Portal Publisher rights © 2016 The Authors. General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Queen's University Belfast Research Portal is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The Research Portal is Queen's institutional repository that provides access to Queen's research output. Every effort has been made to ensure that content in the Research Portal does not infringe any person's rights, or applicable UK laws. If you discover content in the Research Portal that you believe breaches copyright or violates any law, please contact [email protected]. Download date:28. Sep. 2021 The Multidirectional Memory of Charlie Hebdo: Isabel Hollis Queen’s University Belfast Abstract This article will discuss notions and concepts of remembering in the aftermath of the Charlie Hebdo attacks. Much has been written about the immediate response to the attacks, both commending the collective spirit of unity that defined the ‘marche républicaine’ of 11 January 2015, and criticising the alleged hypocrisy and cynicism of, most notably, the political figures that took to the streets that day, hand in hand.
    [Show full text]
  • Why the First Amendment Must Protect Provocative Portrayals of the Prophet Muhammad Daniel Ortner
    Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy Volume 12 | Issue 1 Article 1 Winter 2016 The eT rrorist's Veto: Why the First Amendment Must Protect Provocative Portrayals of the Prophet Muhammad Daniel Ortner Recommended Citation Daniel Ortner, The Terrorist's Veto: Why the First Amendment Must Protect Provocative Portrayals of the Prophet Muhammad, 12 Nw. J. L. & Soc. Pol'y. 1 (2016). http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njlsp/vol12/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. Copyright 2016 by Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law Vol. 12, Issue 1 (2016) Northwestern Journal of Law and Social Policy The Terrorist’s Veto: Why the First Amendment Must Protect Provocative Portrayals of the Prophet Muhammad Daniel Ortner1 I. INTRODUCTION On Wednesday, January 7, 2015, armed gunmen entered the offices of French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo and killed employees and editors of the magazine in probable retaliation for the publication of satirical cartoons depicting the Prophet Muhammad.2 The attack on Charlie Hebdo has contributed to the debate over whether publication of speech that is likely to provoke violent reactions from religious extremists should be permissible.3 Some have argued that such speech should be prohibited in order to prevent responsive violence and terrorism.4 Recently, a school of journalism dean argued in USA Today that the publication of cartoons that insult the Prophet Muhammad 1 Daniel Ortner, J.D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Offensive Depictions of Prophet Muhammad (SAW) in Western
    Volume 4, Issue I Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization Spring 2014 The Offensive Depictions of Prophet Muhammad ( SAW ) in Western Media and its Consequences Aijaz Ahmad Khan PhD Scholar Mewar University, Rajasthan, India Abstract The controversies and provocations generated by the West and its media over depictions of Prophet Muhammad (SAW) are not only related to recent caricatures or cartoons but are also about the display of historical artwork. Recently, many Western organisations, newspapers, magazines, social networks and even websites organised seminars and events like the cartoon "Everybody Draw Mohammed Day!" to hurt and provoke the Muslim world. Muslims believe that visual depictions of all the Prophets should be prohibited and are particularly averse to visual representations of Prophet Muhammad (SAW). The key concern is that the use of images can encourage idolatry. Islam does not allow the depictions of Prophet Muhammad (SAW); to do so goes against the faith of the Muslims and hurts their emotions. This article will focus on providing an analysis of the distorted images, fabricated views, and overgeneralizations which typically characterize Western representation of the Prophet (SAW) of Islam with reference to some particular incidents, chiefly the Charlie Hebdo controversy, Danish newspaper, controversial movie Innocence of Muslims, animated films and social networks. This analysis comprises of works by both Western and Muslim thinkers; it also includes biased and moderate/ fair views depicted in the Western media. Keywords: Portraits of Prophets ( AS ), Drawings, Calligraphy, Media, Image Building Introduction The negative representation of Muslims and Prophet Mohammed ( SAW ) in Western media is not a recent fabrication.
    [Show full text]
  • Gavan Titley, Des Freedman, Gholam Khiabany, Aurélien Mondon, (Eds.)
    1 | CHARLIE HEBDO, REPUBLICAN SECULARISM AND ISLAMOPHOBIA Aurélien Mondon and Aaron Winter The attack against Charlie Hebdo in Paris on 7 January 2015 took place in a context in which Islamophobia had become increasingly mainstream in France.1 The widespread albeit uneven use of the slogan ‘Je Suis Charlie’ across France and the Western world represented for many an assertion of solidarity, and more specifically identification, with Charlie Hebdo and its championing of liberal Enlightenment and Republican values of freedom of speech. This reaction, we were told, was in response to the threat posed by Muslim extremists and terrorists. However, the boundaries between a critique of extremism and terrorism and that of Islamophobia (and anti-Muslim hate), as well as that between the defence of liberal values, Islamophobia and securitisation, have become increasingly blurry. The string of deadly attacks by those identified or self-identifying as ‘Islamist’ and linked to IS (however tenuous that link may be) which have taken place since in Paris, Nice and Saint-Etienne-du-Rouvray have rendered them ever fuzzier. It is for this reason, and the mapping of these discourses and practices as they relate or are deployed in relation to Islam and Muslims, however loosely defined, that we employ our concepts of illiberal and liberal Islamophobia (Mondon and Winter 2017). The illiberal articulation of Islamophobia, or ‘anti-Muslim’ hate, is closest to traditional racism based around exclusivist notions and concepts of race, ethnicity, gender, sexuality and religion, as well as identity itself, and is commonly associated with the extreme right and authoritarian treatment of minority groups and rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Killer Cartoons: Islamophobia, Depictions of the Prophet Muhammad, and the Possible Limitations of Free Speech Chidiebere T
    FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Volume 14 | Issue 3 Article 6 3-1-2016 Killer Cartoons: Islamophobia, Depictions of the Prophet Muhammad, and the Possible Limitations of Free Speech Chidiebere T. Madu Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.unc.edu/falr Part of the First Amendment Commons Recommended Citation Chidiebere T. Madu, Killer Cartoons: Islamophobia, Depictions of the Prophet Muhammad, and the Possible Limitations of Free Speech, 14 First Amend. L. Rev. 489 (2018). Available at: http://scholarship.law.unc.edu/falr/vol14/iss3/6 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in First Amendment Law Review by an authorized editor of Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. KILLER CARTOONS: ISLAMOPHOBIA, DEPICTIONS OF THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD, AND THE POSSIBLE LIMITATIONS OF FREE SPEECH CHIDIEBERE T. MADU* I. INTRODUCTION On May 3, 2015, the Curtis Curwell Center of Garland, Texas was attacked by two heavily armed American-Muslim extremists.' Armed with assault rifles, bulletproof body armor, and hundreds of rounds of ammunition, the gunmen shot and wounded a security guard.2 Before the gunmen could attack other civilians, they were both killed on the scene in a vicious gunfight with local police.3 Their attack of the Curtis Curwell Center was motivated by the "Draw Mu- hammad" Contest, which awarded $10,000 to the contestant who draws the "best caricature of the Prophet Muhammad." 4 In the Mus- lim faith, idol worship is strictly forbidden, thus the depiction of the Prophet Muhammad is seen as exceedingly blasphemous and offen- sive.5 Following the attack, the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant * Juris Doctor Candidate, University of North Carolina School of Law, 2017; Staff Member, FirstAmendment Law Review.
    [Show full text]
  • The Charlie Hebdo Affair and Comparative Journalistic Cultures Lyombe Eko the Charlie Hebdo Affair and Comparative Journalistic Cultures
    The Charlie Hebdo Affair and Comparative Journalistic Cultures Lyombe Eko The Charlie Hebdo Affair and Comparative Journalistic Cultures Human Rights Versus Religious Rites Lyombe Eko Journalism and Creative Media Texas Tech University Lubbock, TX, USA ISBN 978-3-030-18078-2 ISBN 978-3-030-18079-9 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18079-9 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2019 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the ­publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and ­institutional affiliations. Cover illustration: Leontura/DigitalVision Vectors/Getty Images Cover design by Tjaša Krivec This Palgrave Macmillan imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
    [Show full text]