DOCSLIB.ORG

The Following Scope of Work Has Been Prepared to Reflect the Request For

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Following Scope of Work Has Been Prepared to Reflect the Request For TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN FOR SOUTH NORWALK RAILROAD STATION NEIGHBORHOOD EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT Prepared for: The City of Norwalk Prepared by: The Cecil Group, Inc. TR Advisors Milone & MacBroom December 22, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS The Cecil Group – TR Advisors – Milone & MacBroom – Language Link Consortium Existing Conditions Evaluation Report i The Cecil Group – TR Advisors – Milone & MacBroom – Language Link Consortium Existing Conditions Evaluation Report ii SECTION 1: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Overview The Existing Conditions Evaluation Report is a multidisciplinary review of the current elements that comprise the area surrounding the South Norwalk Railroad Station. This document has been assembled as part of the Transit Oriented Development Master Plan for South Norwalk Railroad Station Neighborhood Study Area for the purpose of accurately informing subsequent analyses and decisions related to constructing a Transit Oriented Master Plan for the South Norwalk Railroad Station Neighborhood. The purpose of the Transit Oriented Development Master Plan for South Norwalk Railroad Station Neighborhood Study Area is to provide The City of Norwalk with planning recommendations that can guide and manage future change in the area of the South Norwalk Railroad Station. The aim of the planning recommendations will be to capitalize on this area’s development potential, while providing benefits that will appropriately enhance the area neighborhoods and their component places. Project Goals and Objectives have been collaboratively prepared with members of the public, community stakeholders and City staff, to guide the planning recommendations associated with this project. The project Goals and Objectives are included as Appendix A of this Existing Conditions Evaluation Report. Transit Oriented Development (TOD) generally refers to land use and activities that are advantaged by proximity to and pedestrian access to public transit. Common Transit Oriented Development characteristics include a transit station as a community and development center point and anchor, a safe, accessible and engaging pedestrian environment, a mixed use neighborhood that is primarily residential, and high density levels located at the transit facility that progressively decrease further from the transit station. The underlining principle of these characteristics is that aim to maximize access to public transportation through the implementation of urban planning and real estate development decisions and approaches. The report was produced by multidisciplinary consultant team comprised of land planners, real estate development consultants, transportation engineers, and urban designers. The consultant team members that contributed to this report include: TR Advisors, a specialty real estate consulting and asset management firm focusing on transportation related and entity owned property; Milone & MacBroom, a civil engineering firm with expertise in transportation and circulation planning; and The Cecil Group, a planning and urban design firm with extensive expertise in Transit Oriented Development and urban revitalization in New England and throughout the northeast. The consultant team members conducted research through a combination of onsite observations, stakeholder interviews, and reviews of previous reports and plans, as well as online and City resources. In addition, consultant team members have met regularly with committees established to advise and guide the Transit Oriented Development Master Plan for South Norwalk Railroad Station Neighborhood Study Area project. The advisory committees include The Planning Coordination Committee, comprised of City staff from various departments and the Stakeholder Committee, comprised of South Norwalk neighborhood community and business leaders. The Study Area used for this report is the project’s Pedestrian Access Planning Area, as illustrated in Figure 1: Study Area. The Transit Oriented Neighborhood Planning Area and the Focus Area are also illustrated in Figure 1: Study Area. These planning areas were defined by the consultant team through The Cecil Group – TR Advisors – Milone & MacBroom – Language Link Consortium Existing Conditions Evaluation Report 1 collaborative discussions with the Steering and Coordination Committees as well as consultation with the Norwalk Redevelopment Agency. The process for establishing the Study Area boundaries for neighborhood access and redevelopment considered the standard distances pedestrians will typically walk (one-quarter to one-half mile)to reach transit service along the South Norwalk neighborhood street network as well as activity centers, residential areas, and various community assets. The Study Area is approximately 0.75 square miles. These planning areas acknowledge different types of existing environments, which will require different Transit Oriented Development approaches that are appropriate for each specific area. The information gathered and assembled in this document will guide the decision as to which approaches to Transit Oriented Development should be used in each of these areas. The purpose of this report is to gather information that will enable informed decisions in subsequent phases of this study and the intent of the research is to be able to make assessments regarding trends and analysis. This report includes evaluations of land use, plans and initiatives, property ownership, crime and code violations, an economic and market profile, traffic circulation, transit service, neighborhood issues and demographics. Through the assessment of these elements, the challenges and opportunities of South Norwalk will be defined for the South Norwalk Transit Oriented Development Master Plan to address. Summary of Conditions and Assessments The assessment of the South Norwalk Study Area has been coordinated and organized into categories to facilitate understanding and communication. This summary provides an overview of key components of the Existing Conditions Evaluation Report, which are then further discussed in the subsequent sections. The numbering has been used to simplify referencing concepts. Land Use 1. Land Use Diversity – The South Norwalk Study Area contains a highly diverse mix of land uses. The City of Norwalk Tax Assessor’s Office has categorized 82 different land uses within the South Norwalk Study Area. Residential uses occupy approximately 80% of total parcels in the Study Area and 60% of the total parcel area. The mix and locations of land uses reflect South Norwalk’s historical and current resources such as rail service, and an active commercial waterfront. 2. Zoning Regulations – The Study Area features fourteen different zoning districts, a large number for such a concentrated area. Similar to the Study Area’s land use patterns the range of zoning districts reflects the area’s existing and traditional assets and resources. In spite of the diversity of zoning districts, the dimensional standards are consistent across all zones south of Washington Street with height restrictions ranging between 2.5 stories or 40 feet and 4.5 stories and 55 feet. The consistent dimensional standards contribute to unifying the neighborhood environment where the allowed uses vary considerably. While the zoning districts south of Washington Street enforce a neighborhood scaled environment, the zoning districts in the Study Area north of Washington Street allow for significantly higher density in the Webster Street Block and Reed Putnam areas. The Cecil Group – TR Advisors – Milone & MacBroom – Language Link Consortium Existing Conditions Evaluation Report 2 FIGURE 1: STUDY AREA The Cecil Group – TR Advisors – Milone & MacBroom – Language Link Consortium Existing Conditions Evaluation Report 3 3. Comparison to Transit Oriented Development Districts – The South Norwalk Study Area’s existing land use and zoning regulations contribute to a neighborhood that contains many of the characteristics of typical Transit Oriented Development districts. The Study Area’s existing mix of uses, which is primarily residential, and the planned high-density developments in the Reed Putnam area are elements consistent with Transit Oriented Development districts. The South Norwalk Study Area differs from typical Transit Oriented Development districts by maintaining a greater industrial and manufacturing land use segment than is usual and the area’s planned high density development projects are located further away (approximately a ½ mile) from the transit center. As currently constituted, the South Norwalk Study Area is functioning as a neighborhood connected to, but not fully capitalizing on, its asset of transit service. The planned developments north of Washington Street will contribute to the Transit Oriented Development district characteristics and, although atypical, if active and well connected the industrial and manufacturing uses could become an employment generator within the Transit Oriented Development district. Plans and Initiatives 1. Previous Plans – A series of previous planning and development studies and initiates related to the South Norwalk neighborhood were reviewed. The relatively high number of recent studies conducted for the South Norwalk neighborhood underscores the City’s focus on South Norwalk and the importance of the neighborhood’s assets. Although the purpose and approach of each study and initiative varied considerably, they were unified in the theme of improving the connection and integration of the South Norwalk Railroad Station with the surrounding
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Implementation Plan for Sustainable Development in the New York - Connecticut Metropolitan Region
    Implementation Plan for Sustainable Development in the New York - Connecticut Metropolitan Region MAY 30, 2014 DRAFT: June 2, 2014 - 13:33 SCI Implementation Plan Draft 20140602_final.indd 1 About the New York-Connecticut Sustainable Communities Consortium NY-CT Sustainable Communities Consortium The New York – Connecticut Sustainable Communities Consortium is supported by a U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Office of Sustainable Housing and Communities Regional Planning Grant. The Sustainable Communities Regional Planning Grant program is a key initiative of the Partnership for Sustainable Communities, a federal partnership joining the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Department of Transportation, and HUD with a shared mission to coordinate federal housing, transportation, water, and other infrastructure investments to make neighborhoods more prosperous, allow people to live closer to jobs, save households time and money, and reduce pollution . Partners in the NY-CT Sustainable Communities Consortium An Advisory Board was formed to monitor the progress of include cities, counties, metropolitan planning organizations, Consortium activities, provide recommendations, and review and non-profit organizations across Long Island, New York City, and comment on Consortium work programs. Advisory lower Hudson Valley, and coastal Connecticut: Board members include both governmental agencies and non- governmental organizations in the tri-state New York/New Regional Plan Association, partner and fiduciary agent Jersey/Connecticut
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Greater Bridgeport Region Bridgeport Hospital and St. Vincent's Medical Center Collaborative Community Health Needs Asse
    2019 Greater Bridgeport Region Bridgeport Hospital and St. Vincent’s Medical Center Collaborative Community Health Needs Assessment and Implementation Plan By the Health Improvement Alliance This document is a special section of the Fairfield County Community Wellbeing Index 2019, a core program of DataHaven (ctdatahaven.org), in partnership with Fairfield County’s Community Foundation and a Community Health Needs Assessment for the towns served by all Fairfield County hospitals including Bridgeport Hospital and St. Vincent’s Medical Center 1 | Page ABOUT THIS REPORT This document is a special section of the Fairfield County Community Wellbeing Index 2019 (Appendix A), a comprehensive report about Fairfield County and the towns within it. The Community Index was produced by DataHaven in partnership with Fairfield County’s Community Foundation and many other regional partners, including the Health Improvement Alliance (HIA), a coalition serving towns in the Greater Bridgeport region. This document serves as the Community Health Needs Assessment for the six towns in the HIA area (Bridgeport, Easton, Fairfield, Monroe, Stratford, and Trumbull). The Community Health Needs Assessment documents the process that the HIA used to conduct the regional health assessment and health improvement activities. You may find the full Community Wellbeing Index attached to this section, or posted on the DataHaven, Fairfield County’s Community Foundation, Bridgeport Hospital, St. Vincent’s Medical Center, or any of the town health department websites. The Community Health Needs Assessment and Community Health Improvement Plan were approved by the Board of Trustees for St. Vincent’s Medical Center in June 13, 2019 and the Board of Trustees for Bridgeport Hospital in July 9, 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Releases Gov. Malloy, CTDOT Indefinitely Postpone Hundreds Of
    Press Releases 01/10/2018 Gov. Malloy, CTDOT Indefinitely Postpone Hundreds of Transportation Projects Across Connecticut Malloy Administration Will Work With Legislature to Identify New Funding and Save Projects (HARTFORD, CT) – Governor Dannel P. Malloy and Connecticut Department of Transportation (CTDOT) Commissioner James P. Redeker today released a full list of projects totaling $4.3 billion that are postponed indefinitely until new revenue is appropriated for the Special Transportation Fund (STF). The Governor made clear that his administration will announce detailed proposals this month that, if adopted by the General Assembly, would bring the projects back online. The STF finances the state’s transportation system, including the operating costs of the CTDOT and all of the services it provides. Last month, Governor Malloy reiterated and increased his warnings on the solvency of the fund following the release of a report showing that without prompt action, the STF will be in deficit by fiscal year 2019, which begins July 1, 2018. **Download the list of CTDOT projects now postponed indefinitely here** Hundreds of projects across the state, such as critical improvements to the I-91/Route 15 interchange on the Charter Oak Bridge, the replacement of the Waterbury Mixmaster, and the widening of I-95 from Bridgeport to Stamford, are postponed indefinitely, or until resources are identified to allow projects to continue. Even routine highway maintenance and transportation aid to cities and towns are seriously jeopardized. “If Connecticut does not take the necessary action to allow us to restart these vital projects, not only will it put the state’s infrastructure into a further state of disrepair, it will hurt our economy,” Governor Malloy said.
    [Show full text]
  • AQUIFERPROTECTIONAREA SW Estport , CONNECTICUT
    n M ! R F S o N G o Godfrey Pond C e t Inwood Rd u P u n o d a r u d B W d r n n r t e R L r e t d R d b e r t e R o t t s n R 111 D i l n I o a e l a r o M o t e n l s S1 r R i t t V W w l r A O d n k a l d e K i i R e i S d 1 n M a n n l R W B e l y D H o id g e a a T u a l R t R i Wheelers Pond 1 H L l a a r x d n l B o a g e R d r r a v a d o F d d e d d R n r T t e Nod Hill Pond t e y n l n e R r e R R W d h d o e u d r D e D d i y n u D R v M R e e E w e e d n k d e o S H R u b n d w r r a r r r e Chestnut Hill r c d e o e d d w 7 R H u w o n b L e r D d l R d Mill River h B o d L w t S W n d b n s s s u Plymouth Avenue Pond £ a d s y e ¤ r A u o i R R s o n i b Pipers t o R h d Hill R n d o i n L c S d d e 5 C t a e d r r d d B o U H g Powells Hill k t t o r t 9 d e S k n Spruc u p r l d D o R d c r R R L P e S i a r n s l H r Cristina R 136 i h L Ln e n B l i r T R o d n r d s l L S o n r R V e o H o k L R i r M d t M Killian A H G L a S ve d R e s R y n l g e d Pin 1 i l C r a d w r n M e d d e r a a 1 i R r d c y e D h k h s r S R 1 d o d c E Cricker Brook i t c a k n l 7 r M d r u w a e l o R l n y g a R d r S n d l Dr c e B W od l e F nwo d r Nature Pond o t utt o l S i B t w d C h l S B n y i d r o t l e W ch R e i D R e e o o D p B r M Hill Rd i L d n r H R ey l on r il H P H n L H o ls illa w o d v r w t w a w on La n o s D D d d e O e S e n w r g r R e p i e i W k l n n e d d W t r g L e v e r t l y e l D l r y g l 53 e e T a e o R e l s d y d H n Plum rkw o a D i P a R n l r a S d R L V W i w o u r u Jennings Brook l
    [Show full text]
  • Ride Lots + Municipal and Regional Parking
    PM03: Parking Electronic Payment Parking Management PaymentParking AdministrationManagement request for payment SystemCenter transaction status Payment Device CTDOT Park-and- Financial Center Statewide Smart Ride Lots Financial Institution Card + payment Municipal and payment request Regional Parking Facilities + request for payment Private Parking payment Operators Vehicle OBE Private Vehicles LEGEND planned and future flow existing flow user defined flow PT04: Transit Fare Collection Management CTtransit payment request Transit Management Transit Vehicle OBE Center Financial Center fare collection data CTtransit Vehicles Financial Institution CTtransit Operations transaction status Centers fare management request for fare collection data information payment payment request for payment Traveler Support Payment Device Equipment Regional Transit Card CTtransit Kiosks + Statewide Smart Card payment LEGEND planned and future flow existing flow user defined flow PT04: Transit Fare Collection Management Regional Transit Districts transaction status Financial Center Financial Institution Transit Management Center Transit Vehicle OBE payment request Regional Transit Regional Transit Districts District passenger Paratransit information_ud Vehicles Transportation + fare collection data + Information Center payment request_ud Regional Transit Service Agencies District Vehicles payment_ud + transaction status_ud fare management fare collection data request for information payment payment Payment Device Traveler Support Equipment request for payment
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Oriented Development Final Report | September 2010
    FTA ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS DRAFT/FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DANBURY BRANCH IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT FINAL REPORT | SEPTEMBER 2010 In Cooperation with U.S. Department CONNECTICUT South Western Regional Planning Agency of Transportation DEPARTMENT OF Federal Transit TRANSPORTATION Administration FTA ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS DRAFT/FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DANBURY BRANCH IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT FINAL REPORT | SEPTEMBER 2010 In Cooperation with U.S. Department CONNECTICUT South Western Regional Planning Agency of Transportation DEPARTMENT OF Federal Transit TRANSPORTATION Administration Abstract This report presents an evaluation of transit-oriented development (TOD) opportunities within the Danbury Branch study corridor as a component of the Federal Transit Administration Alternatives Analysis/ Draft Environmental Impact Statement (FTA AA/DEIS) prepared for the Connecticut Department of Transportation (CTDOT). This report is intended as a tool for municipalities to use as they move forward with their TOD efforts. The report identifies the range of TOD opportunities at station areas within the corridor that could result from improvements to the Danbury Branch. By also providing information regarding FTA guidelines and TOD best practices, this report serves as a reference and a guide for future TOD efforts in the Danbury Branch study corridor. Specifically, this report presents a definition of TOD and the elements of TOD that are relevant to the Danbury Branch. It also presents a summary of FTA Guidance regarding TOD and includes case studies of FTA-funded projects that have been rated with respect to their livability, land use, and economic development components. Additionally, the report examines commuter rail projects both in and out of Connecticut that are considered to have applications that may be relevant to the Danbury Branch.
    [Show full text]
  • Green's Farms URBITRANR EPORT
    Individual Station Report Green's Farms URBITRANR EPORT CONTENTS: Stakeholder Interview Customer Opinion Survey Parking Inventory & Utilization Station Condition Inspection Lease Narrative and Synopsis Station Operations Review Station Financial Review URBITRAN Prepared to Connecticut Department of Transportation S ubmitted by Urbitran Associates, Inc. July 2003 June 2003 June 2003 June 2003 June 2003 June 2003 June 2003 Stakeholder Interview URBITRANR EPORT URBITRAN Prepared to Connecticut Department of Transportation S ubmitted by Urbitran Associates, Inc. Westport According to those at the meeting, which included the First and Second Selectmen and a representative from the Police Department, who run the station, Harry Harris wants CDOT to take control of the stations and parking. This was the first issue brought up by the town representatives – that the State wants to run the stations to provide better quality control, and that the State feels that this is the only solution to improve the supply of parking along the entire line. Furthermore, the feeling was that CDOT would be exempt from local zoning and would therefore be in a position to deck parking lots without local permission. Westport feels that they do a good job with the two town stations, and that they have an excellent relationship with Carl Rosa regarding maintenance and operations and with Harry Harris regarding policy. They feel strongly that if other towns ran their stations and parking like they do CDOT would have far fewer issues to contend with. Westport understands the desire for uniformity among the stations and supports that policy, albeit with concern regarding home rule issues. Westport, ultimately, is satisfied with the status quo, and feels the working relationship is excellent, the division of responsibilities clear, and their ability to have input into the ADA design process excellent.
    [Show full text]
  • A Q U I F E R P R O T E C T I O N a R E a S N O R W a L K , C O N N E C T I C
    !n !n S c Skunk Pond Beaver Brook Davidge Brook e d d k h P O H R R O F p S o i d t n n l c t u i l R a T S d o i ll l t e e lv i d o t R r r d r l h t l l a H r n l t r M b a s b R d H e G L R o r re R B C o o u l e t p o n D o e f L i s Weston Intermediate School y l o s L d r t e Huckleberry Hills Brook e t d W d r e g Upper Stony Brook Pond N L D g i b R o s n Ridgefield Pond a t v d id e g e H r i l Country Club Pond b e a R d r r S n n d a g e L o n tin a d ! R d l H B n t x H e W Still Pond d t n Comstock Knoll u d a R S o C R k R e L H d i p d S n a l l F tt h Town Pond d l T te r D o e t l e s a t u e L e c P n n b a n l R g n i L t m fo D b k H r it to Lower Stony Brook Pond o r A d t P n d s H t F u d g L d d i Harrisons Brook R h e k t R r a e R m D l S S e e G E o n y r f ll H rt R r b i i o e n s l t ld d d o r l ib l a e r R d L r O e H w i Fanton Hill g r l Cider Mill School P y R n a ll F i e s w L R y 136 e a B i M e C H k A s t n d o i S d V l n 3 c k r l t g n n a d R i u g d o r a L 3 ! a l r u p d R d e c L S o s e Hurlbutt Elementary School R d n n d D A i K w T n d o O n D t f R l g d R l t ad L i r e R e e r n d L a S i m a o f g n n n D d n R o t h n Middlebrook School ! l n t w Lo t a 33 i n l n i r E id d D w l i o o W l r N e S a d l e P g n V n a h L C r L o N a r N a S e n e t l e b n l e C s h f ! d L nd g o a F i i M e l k rie r id F C a F r w n P t e r C ld l O e r a l y v f e u e o O n e o a P i O i s R w e t n a e l a n T t b s l d l N l k n t g i d u o e a o R W R Hasen Pond n r r n M W B y t Strong
    [Show full text]
  • Norwalk Pedestrian & Bikeway Transportation Plan
    NORWALK PEDESTRIAN & BIKEWAY TRANSPORTATION PLAN Introduction and Existing Conditions Technical Memorandum DRAFT Submitted by: Fitzgerald & Halliday, Inc. 72 Cedar Street Hartford, CT 06106 Contents Vision..............................................................................................3 Executive Summary...........................................................................4 Key Points Plan Purpose....................................................................................5 Background Study Area The Case for Walking & Cycling Plan Development............................................................................7 Review of Existing Plans 2009 Connecticut Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan..........9 SWRPA Bicycle and Pedestrian Study......................................10 2008 Plan of Conservation and Development for Norwalk.......11 Existing Conditions Report..............................................................14 Population and Employment................................................14 Land Use...........................................................................15 Transportation Network.......................................................16 Overpasses & Underpasses..................................................17 Sidewalks & Footpaths.........................................................18 Major Pedestrian Routes......................................................19 Connectivity Plan................................................................23 On-Road Bicycling.............................................................26
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Development Action Plan 2015-2020 Page 2
    2015 Economic Development Action Plan City of Norwalk, CT Norwalk CT Economic Development Action Plan 2015-2020 Page 2 August 2015 Dear Colleagues: Thanks to an enthusiastic and dedicated group of nearly 40 people from a wide variety of sectors -- including business, government, education, culture, tourism and the arts -- I am pleased to present Norwalk’s Economic Development Action Plan. It is a living, dynamic document that we will update periodically, and use as a reference and guide in Board, Commission and Department Head meetings. Many individuals gave considerable time and expertise to assess business needs and identify actions that will make Norwalk an even better place to work, live, shop, play and dine. I am grateful for their time and hard work. I especially want to thank SCORE for facilitating the process, and Elizabeth Stocker, our Director of Economic Development, who coordinated it. Norwalk is a New England maritime community with historic roots. Located in the heart of Fairfield County on Long Island Sound, the City welcomes large corporations, small businesses and entrepreneurs. Norwalk offers economic development expertise and a strong chamber of commerce. Business space ranges from sleek multi-story towers to historical buildings and new mixed-use waterfront developments in the heart of the downtown area. Tourist destinations, hotels, restaurants, and a strong tradition of arts and cultural activities round out this vibrant city. Norwalk is planning for the future by capitalizing on its assets to attract and sustain business, create jobs, develop its workforce, and continuously improve the quality of life for all people. We will continue to partner with major corporations, entrepreneurs and small business owners who call Norwalk home, and reach out to those who might consider locating here.
    [Show full text]
  • Danbury Branch Improvement Program Task 5
    W FTA ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS DRAFT/FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DANBURY BRANCH IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TASK 5 ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM STATE PROJECT 302-008 SECTION 18: VISUAL RESOURCES MAY 2009 State Project No. 302-008 Connecticut Department of Transportation Danbury Branch Improvement Program AA/DEIS SECTION 18. VISUAL RESOURCES INTRODUCTION This section describes the visual resources in the study corridor. Visual resources contribute greatly to environmental quality, shaping the views and aesthetic experiences of people’s daily lives. Visual resources include natural landscape elements as well as features of the built environment. The quality of the visual experience depends on many factors, including the physical attributes of objects, the combination of objects and features in view, the location of visual elements in relation to the viewer, the condition of the elements, their uniqueness, viewer perceptions, and cultural connotations, among many others. Descriptions of landscape characteristics and features under existing conditions lay the groundwork for evaluating the effects of a project on the visual environment. Regulatory Context There are no federal and state laws that specifically protect visual resources across the board. There are, however, several important references to visual resources within the context of historic preservation and coastal zone management statutes. The implications of these legal protections are described below. At the Federal level, the following legislation is relevant to the project:
    [Show full text]
  • CT2030 2020-2030 Base SOGR Investment $10.341 $0.023 $5.786
    Public Transportation Total Roadway Bus Rail ($B) ($B) ($B) CT2030 2020-2030 Base SOGR Investment $10.341 $0.023 $5.786 $16.149 2020-2030 Enhancement Investment $3.867 $0.249 $1.721 $5.837 Total $14.208 $0.272 $7.506 $21.986 Less Allowance for Efficiencies $0.300 CT2030 Program total $21.686 Notes: 2020-2030 Base SOGR Investment Dollars for Roadway also includes funding for bridge inspection, highway operations center, load ratings 2020-2030 program includes "mixed" projects that have both SOGR and Enhancement components. PROJECT ROUTE TOWN DESCRIPTION PROJECT COST PROJECT TYPE SOGR $ 0014-0185 I-95 BRANFORD NHS - Replace Br 00196 o/ US 1 18,186,775 SOGR 100% $ 18,186,775 0014-0186 CT 146 BRANFORD Seawall Replacement 7,200,000 SOGR 100% $ 7,200,000 0015-0339 CT 130 BRIDGEPORT Rehab Br 02475 o/ Pequonnock River (Phase 2) 20,000,000 SOGR 100% $ 20,000,000 0015-0381 CT 8 BRIDGEPORT Replace Highway Signs & Supports 10,000,000 SOGR 100% $ 10,000,000 0036-0203 CT 8 Derby-Seymour Resurfacing, Bridge Rehab & Safety Improvements 85,200,000 SOGR 100% $ 85,200,000 0172-0477 Various DISTRICT 2 Horizontal Curve Signs & Pavement. Markings 6,225,000 SOGR 100% $ 6,225,000 0172-0473 CT 9 & 17 DISTRICT 2 Replace Highway Signs & Sign Supports 11,500,000 SOGR 100% $ 11,500,000 0172-0490 Various DISTRICT 2 Replace Highway Signs & Supports 15,500,000 SOGR 100% $ 15,500,000 0172-0450 Various DISTRICT 2 Signal Replacements for APS Upgrade 5,522,170 SOGR 100% $ 5,522,170 0173-0496 I-95/U.S.
    [Show full text]