AQUIFERPROTECTIONAREA SW Estport , CONNECTICUT

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

AQUIFERPROTECTIONAREA SW Estport , CONNECTICUT n M ! R F S o N G o Godfrey Pond C e t Inwood Rd u P u n o d a r u d B W d r n n r t e R L r e t d R d b e r t e R o t t s n R 111 D i l n I o a e l a r o M o t e n l s S1 r R i t t V W w l r A O d n k a l d e K i i R e i S d 1 n M a n n l R W B e l y D H o id g e a a T u a l R t R i Wheelers Pond 1 H L l a a r x d n l B o a g e R d r r a v a d o F d d e d d R n r T t e Nod Hill Pond t e y n l n e R r e R R W d h d o e u d r D e D d i y n u D R v M R e e E w e e d n k d e o S H R u b n d w r r a r r r e Chestnut Hill r c d e o e d d w 7 R H u w o n b L e r D d l R d Mill River h B o d L w t S W n d b n s s s u Plymouth Avenue Pond £ a d s y e ¤ r A u o i R R s o n i b Pipers t o R h d Hill R n d o i n L c S d d e 5 C t a e d r r d d B o U H g Powells Hill k t t o r t 9 d e S k n Spruc u p r l d D o R d c r R R L P e S i a r n s l H r Cristina R 136 i h L Ln e n B l i r T R o d n r d s l L S o n r R V e o H o k L R i r M d t M Killian A H G L a S ve d R e s R y n l g e d Pin 1 i l C r a d w r n M e d d e r a a 1 i R r d c y e D h k h s r S R 1 d o d c E Cricker Brook i t c a k n l 7 r M d r u w a e l o R l n y g a R d r S n d l Dr c e B W od l e F nwo d r Nature Pond o t utt o l S i B t w d C h l S B n y i d r o t l e W ch R e i D R e e o o D p B r M Hill Rd i L d n r H R ey l on r il H P H n L H o ls illa w o d v r w t w a w on La n o s D D d d e O e S e n w r g r R e p i e i W k l n n e d d W t r g L e v e r t l y e l D l r y g l 53 e e T a e o R e l s d y d H n Plum rkw o a D i P a R n l r a S d R L V W i w o u r u Jennings Brook l R u t r t m i r D D M d O e s d N l n d o l ie n B W f ran o n R l o a R at K d ch Br e o d S w Ch S oo p g e r k r Deutsch Pond d a R R R B d h V d l i o e d c r n l d Td R U M B U L L i u e l ly R D il R Rd t k R s d v e ille v d h v C L C s o t s d m North Branch West Branch Saugatuck River R n r at R e t d R Pl c ll l g d a e i a i o Exit 48 S s H H a as d n P r n F e n D v Exit 48 e llo R d d o i F o n d r D C crib H n ck i a ir O h d M C n S o l lo i w l e r l o y l t s R d i n em n Th AQUIFER PROTECTION AREAS o r e R l n D e H R s r l a e g e e Wendy Road Pond J e F l k g R C g v r w l d R r T id l t r t c o a a R P M d e i d a o D e d D H n r l k n u a t P i h l l d r V n d c o ua m t B a R l ve S o R e i o d ut A a n z aln u r d L Morehouse Brook C c i R W R d v R R f d r e T g y S n f d w i n o l n n R i s n o Rd l e l Ox Hill ok t l H illbro i in H W s H a r o n h y c H r i n r i a r n H Mayapple Brook i S e n n l F D s W d r e i l D L l L P L D l E A S T O N s m Goetzen Brook n ha L or M f l A y d G n R a V d G r o e e Exit 47 e d d r R D o o s d l l o 59 a s i Wheeler Pond s i t l d o t v C S Mullens Pond o e l Turn Pond e e d p r G w S g n o V e i n i t u e e u d r n R G w S f k g o e s t h G h Seeley Pond r l R n o a y n i e H t n t W estpo rt, CON N ECTICUT m o d n w a u n S ir S D B e w r W H o s C J l R R L o ftu k d a o o e c L t r i l n M a F p t S r W d r r R M l M n o n d c R u d k C T S d l o b i e G R n o E h r l Pfeiffer Pond R i o a n e R H o r T e Old Town Rd r r M D p e a ls N y l t l H k i M H g l D d d d c a C n i l u L l R o l B i O r a c d d r l C h u i o g l e a o e o l er o r a i k l l o R S al r t T r T e l o g Hemlocks Reservoir W R a l e o e d n P n almetto Rd l r D y v s l L r h l W H d C M p C o a i r n e R s l W T a r d i f w y l n D L D Lyons Plain d a i s D R s R l e p R i n m e R e r a d l e w R F o e D Halls Pond a Mullens Brook s g a M b K d s d H e r r o o y o e o n r b Laurel Lake East Branch Comstock Brook l d v e n e R Notre Dame High School o C a r m a e B n e y g t l d e i l i i l t d i e A s a c N n r a r m t d T r w S Hoyden Hill i R a L k S n l l r v g T a D o D n y d n ! d S D H a V r L n D e b B R I D G E P O R T e u n w r B lo n u f n u May o D r l e Olmsted Hill Pond n s T c r D S e a n a Flat Rock Hill o r S r i D r a r y r l d e e o d d l r xbrook R r s n O S n e i r l i l e r s P y n y L D e Popes Pond p s o L v s b d e F m i r n e t H r Comstock Brook e L k e Plattsville Sacred Heart University l e r o R D v D k y o Pascone Pond Upper e d m Pheiffer Pond i lo l p F D h R a l L s G 4 r d R b r e ! ld c m L s LEGEN D H y R n pk Winthrop School Fie a O e e e T n e e M ll ck 58 ndia k l r r d s o I a m it a Ln R S s s a C k V a h c n l te g V L K fis h Bla Pascone Pond Lower ! K e a e r g n od o t d C s H a C M S A m H t h in O 1 m t i r i t r n n m ll a p ll a y 1 e a L R s Stil m D k s e d l S lwa k d a M Morehouse Brook Pond c t r n l i ter L w O o e H Cannon Pond L d n i o E yd L o d d o o Dr n R r n e o S n Ranch e C to o r g A g d L r n e d n D Level A Aquifer Pro tec tio n Area (Fina l Ad o pted ) n n R d L l e w R w R to n D h g R n o h n r L n d e d o o d S a Scofield Dam e s c n R n t d k g u o o Cannondale Station d L y k e n o d H P d L s d P R Cobbs Mill Brook Seyer Dam n R R s e A o d n G e d h g a d e D u Rd Tre d R H ! w i e n d o r lane à R R B y r t D e a o r l s W L o d u o l e k n hi s J H f m m c t H k R p i e e w L O a a ls V r g a i s ak i W o B l d s i t n i C o n L l Camfield Hill n n i E t Level A Aquifer Pro tec tio n Area (Fina l) n l a d o r M s o e bb C e r i S lu t a M R S r d i W le ll i l w g r n st D d d a e H d R E o b i e Hill Road Pond n A n e t w D d ie D e g l r R l t a e rd e b i n D s t n P L t Edwards Pond l e S l r d g t e e y a R o e l D S r L s L g C e m r e e n h t 57 R e R ig d l y o v r k l L r d ld c S r r l V S r n e i l c r Weston Middle School d c W R u e M a u R y d n L d s a u o n k O Beaver Brook Dam u lo A E e c e L d h b i Cannondale b L d d H s m a G n e n d H r n S C a e i p m m n B e n s R m T D R d ! i e o s K Turner Ridge R t V Level B Aquifer Pro tec tio n Area (Prelimina ry) i l O e i e t l w h l C t l a p r d e k 0 t H o d t d R u F s e i l d 1 w n t b W D n a c il n t o d P R r d e R r a m k S y R o M i T d t C L o r L c d s b R L h e p m R r s a t a e o W E S T O N r d W r k e s r r n n o k e y u n e r k e n o S Wilton High School i N e D f o e L n u t d v s o b e m a F i a o S l r Old Sherwood Pond Weston High School n i t R l d R D e a d d R H o te s n d h n n R d H ! r L Sturges Ridge C i Cobbs Mill Pond Davidge Pond P l R oo d C n P s r e a i l w w b v n g n r l V a m R m l g l o A o n t o u e y ! s C d a r F a l d L R e 3 C b l R g e Beaver Brook n o 3 R R Skunk Pond n d t le t y d O W d H u o p S Davidge Brook t L O S y d a o e y e a P l E t R R d O a s ss v C p a o a m l i l d L y e l l e A w r n d l G c l e r i i R H k k a D l e w lo g r r Rooster River t e d e il o t W v n a an y o t y o l M H e L c P p y o n t V a H R d d b L S k C r B o d d s n n e S a C s e d e t d i l r m i o Weston Intermediate School R s R H P e l t i r R e l Huckleberry Hills Brook d b W ll H r e Upper Stony Brook Pond O e k e S i R p M r T Ridgefield Pond a g e v o e i h y t P b r l Redding Road Pond i y h Country Club Pond r i H r llt g l m S t r e n o d a l a i d C s W w u L n l ri Cricker Brook e T R n R d ! F d l H H r i to x C R e B d l R o v o h S a R R k Still Pond R o f d s t Comstock Knoll c S o d p d d s l p r A S h n a R Town Pond l d F T te c d e North Stratfield Elementary School o tt o e t e s Delevett Pond D ri ol n u le L g n e k R G T r i L t m r d R k H r t to Lower Stony Brook Pond o k t L e n e P i t d d un g L d id s H R c S Lake Mohegan n D io M g k t r a Harrisons Brook o l n r r S m ! R S S e l i p e l y e R G E d n ll rt r b Newton Pond a o B e i f e n s l l t ld d m r T e i ib l a e r R e T u H e d L r i O Fanton Hill y Q l Cider Mill School y R n a ll H k F i H l w d L S R a H d B i M e C H Stratfield A n d o i a d P R u k d R l n d S r l g n n g d o a d L r R i ! a u l r ra v a r p d R d a a S o e e n c R d l n s Hurlbutt Elementary School D R A Londons Brook m n t r i K i w Hoyt Pond x e L b O T n d o T m o k Toilsome Hill t f R l S g d R l t ad e s d y a L a 8 o A u i r e e e y 5 e L l n d l a S i m n e Hw Exit 44 p C n l n A a o f g t t n n n Sta g C n B a a l d n o t h g e V o Middlebrook School t ! l n t w Lo l h R b v t n t l P i r E o w i s D w l l a g r d e l C o o e r u i e e hee W l t sesprin N e g Rd S n a d l w p o s n Ln C L o N s r N a h R R r r S r a d W t n e t o D n le e C b o c o t n c a e d t a F s ! L nd g o n R e d w i M o l k ie d F C n a d h m t r r i R e r a F r w n t d e r o C o r d i S S l O e r a l o d o d y v t h t 33 f e u e o m v O e o d R H n y L t P i O i e L y y t T in S t n R d l w e e N a V l a n n a T t L b d n n S i R F l N k e o l l t l k n l c D l a t g l i d u o e t R lo o r W.
Recommended publications
  • Natural Hazard Migaon Plan 2016-2021 Update for the South
    Natural Hazard Migaon Plan 2016-2021 Update for the South Western Region Prepared by the Western Conneccut Council of Governments (WCCOG) February 2016 3.0 Hazard Idenficaon and Risk Assessment .... 29 Table of Contents 3.1 Avalanche ........................................................................... 32 Execuve Summary ............................... ES.1 - ES.16 3.2 Dam Failure ........................................................................ 32 3.3 Drought ............................................................................... 36 1.0 Introducon ...................................................... 1 3.4 Earthquake ......................................................................... 39 1.1 Background and Purpose ..................................................... 2 3.5 Erosion ................................................................................ 43 1.2 Hazard Migaon Goals ...................................................... 3 3.6 Expansive Soils ................................................................... 44 1.3 Regional Overview ............................................................... 3 3.7 Extreme Cold ...................................................................... 44 1.4 Climate and Weather ......................................................... 11 3.8 Extreme Heat ..................................................................... 46 2.0 Planning Process ............................................. 13 3.9 Flood ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 2016 Volume 28 Number 4
    The Habitat A newsletter of the Connecticut Association of Conservation & Inland Wetlands Commissions, Inc. Fall 2016 volume 28 number 4 CACIWC’s 39th Annual Meeting & Environmental Conference Saturday, November 12, 2016 New Venue, New Workshops and Networking Opportunities! ACIWC will host an exciting legislative panel biology and habitat management, legal and regulatory discussion during the 2016 Annual Meeting updates & issues, climate adaptation & water Cand Environmental Conference. The panel management, and resource conservation, planning consists of key legislative leaders who will discuss and development. Individual workshops will focus expectations for the upcoming legislative session, on invasive plant and animal species, wetlands case including the ongoing efforts to enact a state consti- law and regulation, vernal pool biology, conducting tutional amendment designed to permanently protect natural resource inventories, climate resiliency state parks and forests. The panel discussion will take update, improving stormwater management, place during the luncheon session. promoting local recycling efforts, and promoting cluster housing as a conservation tool. (See pages 8-9). Our keynote speaker panel includes State Representative James M. Albis (99th House Our new conference venue will also host a revised District), State Senator Ted M. Kennedy, Jr. layout of new and informative displays in an arrange- (12th Senate District), and State Representative ment that will promote open discussions and net- Mary M. Mushinsky (85th House District). This working opportunities among our members and other distinguished panel will also discuss how our member conference attendees. commissions can plan for more ecologically resilient communities, as we prepare for short- and long-term Watch for additional conference news and information changes to Connecticut habitats that may come about on our website.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Oriented Development Final Report | September 2010
    FTA ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS DRAFT/FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DANBURY BRANCH IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT FINAL REPORT | SEPTEMBER 2010 In Cooperation with U.S. Department CONNECTICUT South Western Regional Planning Agency of Transportation DEPARTMENT OF Federal Transit TRANSPORTATION Administration FTA ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS DRAFT/FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DANBURY BRANCH IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT FINAL REPORT | SEPTEMBER 2010 In Cooperation with U.S. Department CONNECTICUT South Western Regional Planning Agency of Transportation DEPARTMENT OF Federal Transit TRANSPORTATION Administration Abstract This report presents an evaluation of transit-oriented development (TOD) opportunities within the Danbury Branch study corridor as a component of the Federal Transit Administration Alternatives Analysis/ Draft Environmental Impact Statement (FTA AA/DEIS) prepared for the Connecticut Department of Transportation (CTDOT). This report is intended as a tool for municipalities to use as they move forward with their TOD efforts. The report identifies the range of TOD opportunities at station areas within the corridor that could result from improvements to the Danbury Branch. By also providing information regarding FTA guidelines and TOD best practices, this report serves as a reference and a guide for future TOD efforts in the Danbury Branch study corridor. Specifically, this report presents a definition of TOD and the elements of TOD that are relevant to the Danbury Branch. It also presents a summary of FTA Guidance regarding TOD and includes case studies of FTA-funded projects that have been rated with respect to their livability, land use, and economic development components. Additionally, the report examines commuter rail projects both in and out of Connecticut that are considered to have applications that may be relevant to the Danbury Branch.
    [Show full text]
  • Norwalk Community Food Report
    Norwalk Community Food Report January 2020 Prepared and Presented by: Fairfield University’s Center for Social Impact Norwalk Health Department Additional Data Analysis provided by: CT Food Bank Research Team: Director of Center for Social Impact: Melissa Quan Research Coordinator: Jonathan Delgado Student Researcher: Mahammad Camara ‘19 Editors: Sophia Gourgiotis Luckario Alcide Eileen Michaud Research Partners: Norwalk Health Department Health Educator: Theresa Argondezzi Food Access Project Coordinator: Pamela Flausino Melo da Silva Additional Data Resources Made Available by CT Food Bank: Jamie Foster, PhD Acknowledgments Center for Social Impact 4 Healthy for Life Project 5 Project Overview 6 How To Use This Report 7 Norwalk Food Agencies 8 Norwalk Maps And Tables Food Insecurity 9 Populations Children 12 Immigrant (Foreign Born) Population 14 Seniors 16 Single Parent/Guardian 18 Services Disability 20 Free & Reduced-Price Lunch 22 SNAP & WIC 24 Social Determinants Educational Attainment 28 Housing Burden 32 Transportation 34 Unemployment 36 Key Findings 38 Taking Action: Norwalk Food Access Initiative 39 Appendix A: Census Boundary Reference Map 41 Appendix B: Population Density Table 42 Appendix C: SNAP & WIC Retailers 43 Appendix D: SNAP & WIC Information 45 Appendix E: Data Source Tables 46 Glossary 47 References 48 TABLE OF Contents Page 3 of 50 Center for Social Impact The Center for Social Impact was founded in 2006 with the goal of integrating the Jesuit, Catholic mission of Fairfield University, which includes a commitment to service and social justice, through the academic work of teaching and research. The Center for Social Impact has three major programs: 1. Community-Engaged Learning (formerly known as Service Learning) 2.
    [Show full text]
  • A Q U I F E R P R O T E C T I O N a R E a S N O R W a L K , C O N N E C T I C
    !n !n S c Skunk Pond Beaver Brook Davidge Brook e d d k h P O H R R O F p S o i d t n n l c t u i l R a T S d o i ll l t e e lv i d o t R r r d r l h t l l a H r n l t r M b a s b R d H e G L R o r re R B C o o u l e t p o n D o e f L i s Weston Intermediate School y l o s L d r t e Huckleberry Hills Brook e t d W d r e g Upper Stony Brook Pond N L D g i b R o s n Ridgefield Pond a t v d id e g e H r i l Country Club Pond b e a R d r r S n n d a g e L o n tin a d ! R d l H B n t x H e W Still Pond d t n Comstock Knoll u d a R S o C R k R e L H d i p d S n a l l F tt h Town Pond d l T te r D o e t l e s a t u e L e c P n n b a n l R g n i L t m fo D b k H r it to Lower Stony Brook Pond o r A d t P n d s H t F u d g L d d i Harrisons Brook R h e k t R r a e R m D l S S e e G E o n y r f ll H rt R r b i i o e n s l t ld d d o r l ib l a e r R d L r O e H w i Fanton Hill g r l Cider Mill School P y R n a ll F i e s w L R y 136 e a B i M e C H k A s t n d o i S d V l n 3 c k r l t g n n a d R i u g d o r a L 3 ! a l r u p d R d e c L S o s e Hurlbutt Elementary School R d n n d D A i K w T n d o O n D t f R l g d R l t ad L i r e R e e r n d L a S i m a o f g n n n D d n R o t h n Middlebrook School ! l n t w Lo t a 33 i n l n i r E id d D w l i o o W l r N e S a d l e P g n V n a h L C r L o N a r N a S e n e t l e b n l e C s h f ! d L nd g o a F i i M e l k rie r id F C a F r w n P t e r C ld l O e r a l y v f e u e o O n e o a P i O i s R w e t n a e l a n T t b s l d l N l k n t g i d u o e a o R W R Hasen Pond n r r n M W B y t Strong
    [Show full text]
  • South Norwalk Individual Station Report
    SOUTH NORWALK TRAIN STATION VISUAL INSPECTION REPORT January 2007 Prepared by the Bureau of Public Transportation Connecticut Department of Transportation South Norwalk Train Station Visual Inspection Report January 2007 Overview: The South Norwalk Train Station is located in the SoNo District section of the City of Norwalk. The city and the Department reconstructed the South Norwalk Train Station about 15 years ago. A parking garage, waiting room, ticket windows, municipal electricity offices, and security office replaced the old westbound station building. The old eastbound station building was rehabilitated at the same time. The interior has been nicely restored. Motorists can get to the station from nearby I-95, Route 7 and Route 1. However, one must be familiar with the since trailblazing is inconsistent. Where signs indicate the station, the message is sometimes lost amidst the clutter of street, advertising, landmark and business signs. A bright, clean tunnel connects the two station buildings. Elevators and ramps provide platform accessibility for the less able. The two ten-car platforms serve as center island platforms at their respective east ends for Danbury Branch service. At this time, the Department is replacing the railroad bridge over Monroe Street as part of its catenary replacement project. Bridge plates are in place over Track 3 to accommodate the required track outage. The South Norwalk Station is clean except around the two pocket tracks at the east end of the station. Track level litter has piled up along the rails and under the platforms. Litter is also excessive along the out of service track. Maintenance Responsibilities: Owner: City Operator: City Platform Lights: Metro-North Trash: Metro-North Snow Removal: Metro-North Shelter Glazing: Metro-North Platform Canopy: Metro-North Platform Structure: Metro-North Parking: LAZ Page 2 South Norwalk Train Station Visual Inspection Report January 2007 Station Layout: Aerial Photo by Aero-Metric, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 CT IWQR Appendix
    1 Appendix A-3. Connecticut 305b Assessment Results for Estuaries Connecticut 2018 305b Assessment Results Estuaries Appendix A-3 Waterbody Waterbody Square Segment ID Name Location Miles Aquatic Life Recreation Shellfish Shellfish Class See Map for Boundaries. Central portion of LIS, LIS CB Inner - Inner Estuary, Patchogue and Menunketesuck Rivers Patchogue And from mouths at Grove Beach Point, US to saltwater Menunketesuc limits just above I95 crossing, and at I95 crossing NOT Direct CT-C1_001 k Rivers respectively, Westbrook. 0.182 UNASSESSED UNASSESSED SUPPORTING Consumption See Map for Boundaries. Central portion of LIS, LIS CB Inner - Inner Estuary, SB water of inner Clinton Harbor, Inner Clinton including mouths of Hammonasset, Indian, Harbor, Hammock Rivers, and Dudley Creek (includes NOT FULLY Commercial CT-C1_002-SB Clinton Esposito Beach), Clinton. 0.372 SUPPORTING UNASSESSED SUPPORTING Harvesting See Map for Boundaries. Central portion of LIS, Inner Estuary, Hammonasset River SB water from LIS CB Inner - mouth at inner Clinton Harbor, US to SA/SB water Hammonasset quality line between Currycross Road and RR track, NOT Commercial CT-C1_003-SB River, Clinton Clinton. 0.072 UNASSESSED UNASSESSED SUPPORTING Harvesting 2 See Map for Boundaries. Central portion of LIS, Inner Estuary, Hayden Creek SB water from mouth LIS CB Inner - at Hammonasset River (parallel with Pratt Road), US Hayden Creek, to saltwater limit near Maple Avenue (off Route 1), NOT Commercial CT-C1_004-SB Clinton Clinton. 0.009 UNASSESSED UNASSESSED SUPPORTING Harvesting See Map for Boundaries. Central portion of LIS, Inner Estuary, (DISCONTINUOUS SEGMENT) SA LIS CB Inner - water of upper Hammonasset, Indian, Hammock Clinton Harbor Rivers, Dudley Creek and other small tributaries, (SA Inputs), from SA/SB water quality line, US to saltwater NOT Direct CT-C1_005 Clinton limits, Clinton.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Resources Evaluation Report
    Archaeological and Historical Services, Inc. Historic Resources Evaluation Report Walk Bridge Replacement Project Norwalk, Connecticut State Project No. 0301-0176 Prepared for HNTB Corporation Boston, Massachusetts by Archaeological and Historical Services, Inc. Storrs, Connecticut for submission to The Connecticut Department of Transportation Authors: Bruce Clouette Marguerite Carnell Rodney Stacey Vairo August 2016 ABSTRACT AND MANAGEMENT SUMMARY The State of Connecticut, through the Connecticut Department of Transportation (CTDOT), is planning the replacement of the 1896 Norwalk River railroad swing bridge in Norwalk, Connecticut, in order to improve the safety and reliability of service along the state’s busiest rail corridor. The project will receive funding from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), requiring consultation with the State Historic Preservation Office (CTSHPO) regarding possible impacts to significant historic and archaeological resources under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act. CTDOT is studying variants of the movable replacement bridge, including a vertical lift span option and a bascule span option. This report presents the results of research, field inspection, and analysis for the historic resources that may be affected by the project. Historic resources as considered herein are limited to above-ground (i.e., standing) properties: buildings, structures, objects, districts, landscapes, and sites that meet the criteria for listing in
    [Show full text]
  • Norwalk Pedestrian & Bikeway Transportation Plan
    NORWALK PEDESTRIAN & BIKEWAY TRANSPORTATION PLAN Introduction and Existing Conditions Technical Memorandum DRAFT Submitted by: Fitzgerald & Halliday, Inc. 72 Cedar Street Hartford, CT 06106 Contents Vision..............................................................................................3 Executive Summary...........................................................................4 Key Points Plan Purpose....................................................................................5 Background Study Area The Case for Walking & Cycling Plan Development............................................................................7 Review of Existing Plans 2009 Connecticut Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan..........9 SWRPA Bicycle and Pedestrian Study......................................10 2008 Plan of Conservation and Development for Norwalk.......11 Existing Conditions Report..............................................................14 Population and Employment................................................14 Land Use...........................................................................15 Transportation Network.......................................................16 Overpasses & Underpasses..................................................17 Sidewalks & Footpaths.........................................................18 Major Pedestrian Routes......................................................19 Connectivity Plan................................................................23 On-Road Bicycling.............................................................26
    [Show full text]
  • Danbury Branch Improvement Program Task 5
    W FTA ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS DRAFT/FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DANBURY BRANCH IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TASK 5 ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM STATE PROJECT 302-008 SECTION 18: VISUAL RESOURCES MAY 2009 State Project No. 302-008 Connecticut Department of Transportation Danbury Branch Improvement Program AA/DEIS SECTION 18. VISUAL RESOURCES INTRODUCTION This section describes the visual resources in the study corridor. Visual resources contribute greatly to environmental quality, shaping the views and aesthetic experiences of people’s daily lives. Visual resources include natural landscape elements as well as features of the built environment. The quality of the visual experience depends on many factors, including the physical attributes of objects, the combination of objects and features in view, the location of visual elements in relation to the viewer, the condition of the elements, their uniqueness, viewer perceptions, and cultural connotations, among many others. Descriptions of landscape characteristics and features under existing conditions lay the groundwork for evaluating the effects of a project on the visual environment. Regulatory Context There are no federal and state laws that specifically protect visual resources across the board. There are, however, several important references to visual resources within the context of historic preservation and coastal zone management statutes. The implications of these legal protections are described below. At the Federal level, the following legislation is relevant to the project:
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality Conditions in the Silvermine / Lower Norwalk River
    Water Quality Data Report For The Silvermine River and Lower Norwalk River June 2009 through July 2009 Site SM6 at Silvermine Tavern Dam Submitted by: Richard Harris, Principal Investigator, Staff Scientist/Director of the Harbor Watch/River Watch Program at Earthplace, Westport, CT, Phone (203) 227-7253 Peter Fraboni, Associate Director & QA/QC Officer for the Harbor Watch/River Watch program at Earthplace, Westport, CT Eric Sroka, Coastal Studies Technician for the Harbor Watch/River Watch program at Earthplace, Westport, CT Josh Cooper and Christine Wozniak, Norwalk Mayor’s Water Quality Committee summer interns 2009 Water Quality Data Report for The Silvermine River and Lower Norwalk River June 2009 through July 2009 Table of Contents I Index of Figures and Tables II Acknowledgements V Abstract 1 Introduction 1 Three Research Zones 1 Methods and Procedures (Zones A, B and C) 6 Section I Introduction, Zone A (Upper Silvermine River) 7 Results, Zone A 8 Discussion, Zone A 9 Data, Zone A 11 Site Description, GPS coordinates for Zone A 12 Section II Introduction, Zone B (Lower Silvermine River) 13 Results, Zone B (Lower Silvermine River) 13 Results, Zone B (Silvermine Brook) 17 Discussion, Zone B 17 Conclusion 18 Data, Zone B (Lower Silvermine River and 19 Silvermine Brook) Site Description, GPS coordinates for Zone B 20 Section III Introduction, Zone C (Lower Norwalk River) 21 Results, Zone C 21 Discussion, Zone C 25 Data, Zone C 27 Site Description, GPS coordinates for Zone C 28 Moody’s Storm Drain Network Introduction, Moody’s Lane
    [Show full text]
  • Lip Fall 2012
    Fall 2012 NEWSLETTER OF LONG ISLAND PADDLERS lipaddlers.org Long Island Paddlers in Greece Photo courtesy of Lois Gibney Letter from the President By Steve Berner If you are like me, you are probably wondering Emery Korpi designed and built his own kayak where the summer went. It seems like just trainer, Ed Luke shared information on the yesterday that we were putting away the cold dangers of cold water paddling, Maureen Dunn water gear and getting ready for the June taught us everything we will ever need to know picnic. Now, here it is, the middle of October, about tides, Liz Marcellus and Chris Scalisi the air and the water are starting to cool, and I shared stories and pictures of their kayaking am checking to see if the gaskets on my dry suit adventures in faraway places, Kevin need to be changed and if I can still fit into my Stiegelmaier introduced us to his second book wet suit. Like it or not, another kayaking (Paddling Long Island and New York City), and season is drawing to a close for most of us. Alan Mindlin shared his knowledge on how to This is also the time I like to look back on the buy a boat. We were also lucky to have Chris year gone by. Raab from TukTu Paddles in New Jersey come We were fortunate to have every Board position and speak to us about the Greenland paddles he filled again this year. The club always operates hand crafts. better when there are many people pitching in, While much has been accomplished this year, or as the Amish are fond of saying, “Many thanks to the hard work of a lot of people, there hands, make light work.” The members of the are still some great events coming up.
    [Show full text]