DOCSLIB.ORG

ANNUAL NOISE MANAGEMENT REPORT Message on Operations and Noise Management at Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

2020 ANNUAL NOISE MANAGEMENT REPORT Message on Operations and Noise Management at Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport What a difference a year can make. to maintain the airport and airfield residence as much as possible. However, in reality, the change to Billy in order to provide service to Ornge With people home more, noise issues Bishop Toronto City Airport didn’t take medevac, which has served an became more noticeable for some a year – the change came overnight essential role during this pandemic residents. Many airports in Canada with the emergence of a global from day one. The airport also remains have experienced a similar shift in pandemic and the resulting seismic open for General Aviation (GA) clients, complaints during this timeframe. disruption and disabling of airline the flight schools, as well as smaller service around the world. carriers such as Cameron Air and Against this backdrop I can report FlyGTA. that the noise office received For our part, our resident airlines 333 complaints in 2020, which is down – Porter Airlines and Air Canada What also remains is our commitment from 542 complaints in 2019. While – made the unprecedented but prudent to working with the community to complaints related to aircraft activity decision in March 2020 to temporarily maintain balance in our operations were down, complaints specific to the suspend air carrier service at and conduct our business in a way ferry were up in 2020. We are pleased Billy Bishop Airport until the that reflects a commitment to to confirm that despite the current conditions were appropriate to sustainability, an emphasis on financial hardships being experienced resume service. As I write this in community initiatives, and an by Billy Bishop Airport – and every February 2021, these airlines are imperative to communicate and airport in Canada and around the still in a holding pattern awaiting a report with transparency. world – PortsToronto has chosen to meaningful reduction in infection continue work on the conversion of numbers that will provide for a In an example of the latter, the 2020 the Marilyn Bell I passenger ferry to lessening of government restrictions Noise Report is now before you to electric power. This conversion will be and the re-emergence of passenger report on our efforts to manage noise complete in 2021 and will effectively demand for air travel. We are confident and introduce improvements to eliminate noise and air emissions from that conditions will improve and that mitigate operational impacts. The the ferry operation. our carriers will restart at Billy Bishop report also details the number and Airport this spring/summer, and nature of complaints received in 2020. Although overall community anxiously await a return of passengers complaints were down in 2020, there and a resumption of the world-class With commercial airline activity were two areas that experienced service that has won us awards and suspended in March 2020, our increases: Wards Island logged has given our staff, stakeholders and noise profile is different this year 41 complaints in 2020, which is up community a point of pride and and reflects a unique reality of 2020. from 35 in 2019; and Mimico had one purpose for so many years. Interestingly, while commercial complaint in 2020, whereas this area activity was mostly suspended had zero complaints the year prior. But as different as the airport is during 2020, many residents now All other complaints are down by right now, it also remains the same found themselves at home with neighbourhood. in many respects. The PortsToronto/ governments encouraging people Billy Bishop Airport team continues to stay home and work from their Message on Operations and Noise Management at Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport (continued) The increase in complaints for Wards We are thrilled with the results of In the meantime, the Billy Bishop Island came from General Aviation this initiative that will provide new Airport team will continue to maintain and flight school activity. With many and enhanced public space, better the airport for the businesses that activities restricted in 2020, General access for the airport and the continue to operate, including Ornge Aviation was still permitted and Billy neighbouring TDSB Waterfront School, medevac which is based at our Bishop Airport and many GA airports and a new promenade and trees. airport and has been tasked with experienced an increase in the number I would encourage you to read more the important role of distributing of GA movements in the year. This about this project on pages 7 and 10. vaccines to northern communities in increased activity, combined with an initiative dubbed Operation Remote people spending more time at home, I am also pleased to report that Immunity. was likely a primary driver for the despite the COVID-19 pandemic increase in complaints over Wards and the lockdowns that prevented We will also continue work on the Island. gatherings, the Community Liaison electric conversion of the Marilyn Bell I Committee (CLC) met as scheduled with a view to having this newly The Billy Bishop Airport team with the first of four meetings being modified vessel in service in 2021 continues to work with our individual held in person, and the remaining (pg. 8); will continue to work with the pilots and businesses to adhere to our three meetings happening online via community through CLC meetings; good neighbour policies specific to the ZOOM. The Noise Sub-Committee also share the results of our Ground Noise Toronto Islands and other community met in person and online for a total of Study (pg. 6); and of course welcome areas. The vast majority of pilots three meetings. the restart of our commercial airlines follow our published policy and are when the time is right. complying with this framework. We Although we are always pleased when continue to work with all involved to we can report a decrease in noise May the months ahead continue to ensure awareness of the expectations complaints, the circumstances that keep everyone safe and healthy and we for the community on overflights and brought about this reduction has look forward to better times in 2021. compliance for our operators. been linked to a detrimental decline in aviation overall, including Our noise office also received Billy Bishop Airport. The year 2020 complaints linked to construction has been challenging for many of activities associated with the us and we are all looking forward to Bathurst Quay Neighbourhood Plan sunnier skies in 2021 and beyond with (BQNP) being implemented by the a return to travel when the time is City of Toronto in partnership with right. When that time comes we will Gene Cabral PortsToronto. This activity was welcome back our passengers with a Executive Vice President, specific to the BQNP and is now Safe Travels Program that will ensure PortsToronto and Billy Bishop complete in terms of the work that everyone’s experience is positive Toronto City Airport required for PortsToronto property. and safe. Other By the numbers Ferry Related Scheduled Uncorrelated Commercial COMPLAINTS Mainland Military Engine Related BY ACTIVITY Medevac Run-Up 2020 Helicopters General Construction Related Aircraft Related COMPLAINTS OF AIRCRAFT FIVE YEAR ANNUAL COMPARISON OPERATIONS OF NOISE COMPLAINTS BY TYPE 2020 General Aviation 542 333 236 271 228 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 MONTHLY COMPARISON OF NOISE NOISE COMPLAINT TOTAL 2019 COMPLAINTS 2019 AND 2020 NOISE COMPLAINT TOTAL 2020 100 LOWEST MONTH 90 FOR COMPLAINTS: DECEMBER 2020 80 HIGHEST MONTH 70 FOR COMPLAINTS: SEPTEMBER 2020 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Noise Noise Monitor Noise-Sub Management Terminals Committee Office Noise Monitoring Terminals (NMTs) A Noise Management Sub-Committee are the foundation of the airport’s noise of the Community Liaison Committee Part of our commitment to our noise monitoring system and provide ongoing (CLC) was formed in late 2017 to further management program includes noise-level data to the airport’s Noise research, understand and address noise dedicated staff in our Noise Management Management Office. This data is then impacts from airport operations. The Office who collect, analyze and respond used in long-term noise mitigation Noise Sub-Committee consists of four to noise complaints and monitor daily planning and in responding to noise community members, two staff members operations. Staff at the office use complaints from the surrounding from PortsToronto, one staff member Vortex, a customizable tracking and community. from the City of Toronto and a facilitator logging software platform, designed from Lura Consulting. specifically for the needs of an airport As part of our continuing efforts to environment, to track, document and ensure improvements between The committee has two co-chairs, respond to noise complaints. operations at Billy Bishop Toronto City one from the community and one from Airport and the surrounding community, PortsToronto. The committee met three A response time policy has been in place PortsToronto currently operates four times in 2020. at the Noise Management Office since NMTs: 2011, and mandates a response time of five business days. The economic impacts • One located on the Toronto Police of the COVID-19 pandemic and resulting Marine Unit building; WebTrak staffing changes at the airport led to • One located at Toronto Fire Station slower response rates in 2020. In 2020, 335 on the Toronto Islands; 98.5% per cent of all noise complaints We continue to offer free access to were responded to within five business • One currently installed on the Webtrak, which enables anyone with days. mainland ferry terminal to be a computer, smartphone or tablet to relocated to a building in the gather information on any aircraft community in 2021; and activity they may hear overhead.
Recommended publications
  • Curriculum Vitae

    Curriculum Vitae

    Cole Swanson | Curriculum Vitae Education University of Toronto Masters of Art, Art History 2013 University of Guelph Bachelor of Arts, Honours: Studio Art 2004 Solo & Dual Exhibitions Spadina House Museum, Toronto Research Project and Solo Exhibition – TBA (forthcoming) 2020 Hamilton Artist Inc, Cannon Gallery, Hamilton Devil’s Colony (forthcoming) 2019 Rajasthan Lalit Kala Academy, Jaipur The Furrow, The Froth 2018 The Open Space Society, Jaipur िमटटी िसटी | Mitti City 2018 Unilever Factory & Design Exchange, Toronto Muzzle and Hoof, Horn and Bone 2017 Expo for Design, Innovation, and Technology Casa Na Ilha, Ilhabela, Brazil Lecanora Muralis 2017 Art Gallery of Guelph, Guelph Out of the Strong, Something Sweet 2016 Jawahar Kala Kendra, Jaipur, India Red Earth 2014 Museum of Northern History, Kirkland Lake Monuments & Melodramas 2012 Le Gallery, Toronto Next Exit (with Jennie Suddick) 2011 Ministry of Casual Living, Victoria, BC Mile Zero (with Jennie Suddick) 2011 Jawahar Kala Kendra, Jaipur, India of a feather 2007 Zero Four Art Space, Chung Li, Taiwan of a feather 2006 The Canadian Trade Office, Taipei, Taiwan of a feather 2006 Stirred a Bird Gallery, Guelph everybody in Flamingo 2005 Zavitz Hall Gallery, Guelph Shauchaalaya/Latrine 2003 Selected Group Exhibitions 2020 The Reach Glimmers of the Radiant Real (Forthcoming) Abbottsford, BC 2019 McIntosh Gallery, University of Western Ontario Glimmers of the Radiant Real (Forthcoming) London Gladstone Hotel Come Up to My Room, Terraflora (Solo) Toronto 2018 Paul Petro Contemporary Art
  • 3131 Lower Don River West Lower Don River West 4.0 DESCRIPTION

    3131 Lower Don River West Lower Don River West 4.0 DESCRIPTION

    Lower Don River West Environmental Study Report Remedial Flood Protection Project 4.0 DESCRIPTION OF LOWER DON 4.1 The Don River Watershed The Don River is one of more than sixty rivers and streams flowing south from the Oak Ridges Moraine. The River is approximately 38 km long and outlets into the Keating Channel, which then conveys the flows into Toronto Harbour and Lake Historic Watershed Ontario. The entire drainage basin of the Don urbanization of the river's headwaters in York River is 360 km2. Figure 4.1 and Figure 4.2, on the Region began in the early 1980s and continues following pages, describe the existing and future today. land use conditions within the Don River Watershed. Hydrologic changes in the watershed began when settlers converted the forests to agricultural fields; For 200 years, the Don Watershed has been many streams were denuded even of bank side subject to intense pressures from human vegetation. Urban development then intensified settlement. These have fragmented the river the problems of warmer water temperatures, valley's natural branching pattern; degraded and erosion, and water pollution. Over the years often destroyed its once rich aquatic and during the three waves of urban expansion, the terrestrial wildlife habitat; and polluted its waters Don River mouth, originally an extensive delta with raw sewage, industrial/agricultural marsh, was filled in and the lower portion of the chemicals, metals and other assorted river was straightened. contaminants. Small Don River tributaries were piped and Land clearing, settlement, and urbanization have buried, wetlands were "reclaimed," and springs proceeded in three waves in the Don River were lost.
  • Financial Reporting and Is Ultimately Responsible for Reviewing and Approving the Financial Statements

    Financial Reporting and Is Ultimately Responsible for Reviewing and Approving the Financial Statements

    Treasury Board Secretariat ANNUAL REPORT OF ONTARIO Financial Statements of Government Organizations VOLUME 2B | 2015-2016 7$%/( 2)&217(176 9ROXPH% 3DJH *HQHUDO 5HVSRQVLEOH0LQLVWU\IRU*RYHUQPHQW$JHQFLHV LL $*XLGHWRWKHAnnual Report .. LY ),1$1&,$/ 67$7(0(176 6HFWLRQ ņ*RYHUQPHQW 2UJDQL]DWLRQV± &RQW¶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
  • Toronto Islands Flood Characterization and Risk Assessment Project Flood Risk Assessment Report

    Toronto Islands Flood Characterization and Risk Assessment Project Flood Risk Assessment Report

    Toronto Islands Flood Characterization and Risk Assessment Project Flood Risk Assessment Report 30 April 2019 | 13017.101.R2.Rev0_FloodRisk Toronto Islands Flood Characterization and Risk Assessment Project Flood Risk Assessment Report Prepared for: Prepared by: Toronto and Region Conservation Authority W.F. Baird & Associates Coastal Engineers Ltd. 101 Exchange Avenue Vaughan, Ontario For further information, please contact L4K 5R6 Josh Wiebe at +1 905 845 5385 [email protected] www.baird.com 13017.101.R2.Rev0_FloodRisk Z:\Shared With Me\QMS\2019\Reports_2019\13017.101.R2.Rev0_FloodRisk.docx Revision Date Status Comments Prepared Reviewed Approved A 2018/02/12 Draft Client Review DJE JDW RBN 0 2018/04/30 Final Final Report JDW RBN RBN © 2019 W.F. Baird & Associates Coastal Engineers Ltd. (Baird) All Rights Reserved. Copyright in the whole and every part of this document, including any data sets or outputs that accompany this report, belongs to Baird and may not be used, sold, transferred, copied or reproduced in whole or in part in any manner or form or in or on any media to any person without the prior written consent of Baird. This document was prepared by W.F. Baird & Associates Coastal Engineers Ltd. for Toronto and Region Conservation Authority. The outputs from this document are designated only for application to the intended purpose, as specified in the document, and should not be used for any other site or project. The material in it reflects the judgment of Baird in light of the information available to them at the time of preparation. Any use that a Third Party makes of this document, or any reliance on decisions to be made based on it, are the responsibility of such Third Parties.
  • Toronto Has No History!’

    Toronto Has No History!’

    ‘TORONTO HAS NO HISTORY!’ INDIGENEITY, SETTLER COLONIALISM AND HISTORICAL MEMORY IN CANADA’S LARGEST CITY By Victoria Jane Freeman A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History University of Toronto ©Copyright by Victoria Jane Freeman 2010 ABSTRACT ‘TORONTO HAS NO HISTORY!’ ABSTRACT ‘TORONTO HAS NO HISTORY!’ INDIGENEITY, SETTLER COLONIALISM AND HISTORICAL MEMORY IN CANADA’S LARGEST CITY Doctor of Philosophy 2010 Victoria Jane Freeman Graduate Department of History University of Toronto The Indigenous past is largely absent from settler representations of the history of the city of Toronto, Canada. Nineteenth and twentieth century historical chroniclers often downplayed the historic presence of the Mississaugas and their Indigenous predecessors by drawing on doctrines of terra nullius , ignoring the significance of the Toronto Purchase, and changing the city’s foundational story from the establishment of York in 1793 to the incorporation of the City of Toronto in 1834. These chroniclers usually assumed that “real Indians” and urban life were inimical. Often their representations implied that local Indigenous peoples had no significant history and thus the region had little or no history before the arrival of Europeans. Alternatively, narratives of ethical settler indigenization positioned the Indigenous past as the uncivilized starting point in a monological European theory of historical development. i i iii In many civic discourses, the city stood in for the nation as a symbol of its future, and national history stood in for the region’s local history. The national replaced ‘the Indigenous’ in an ideological process that peaked between the 1880s and the 1930s.
  • AECOM Report 1.Dot

    AECOM Report 1.Dot

    Environmental Assessment chapter 3. description of the potentially affected environment 3. Description of the Potentially Affected Environment This chapter is divided into four different sections which describe different components of the baseline or existing environmental conditions. The first section describes the river characteristics which will influence the development of alternatives. This information has been separated from the remaining description of the natural environment such that some emphasis can be given to those aspects of the existing environment that are driving the development of alternatives for the DMNP. The second section describes the remaining components of the natural environment: fish and fish habitat, terrestrial vegetation, and wildlife. The third section addresses components related to soils and groundwater contamination. The final section describes socio-economic components: land use, air quality and noise, archaeology, aboriginal interests, and built heritage. 3.1 River Characteristics in the Project and Impact Assessment Study Areas The Don Watershed possesses a dendretic drainage pattern that flows southward for 38 kilometres (as the crow flies) from the Oak Ridges Moraine (ORM) to the Inner Harbour of Toronto. The Don possesses two major branches (the East and West Don), each consisting of many smaller sub-watershed systems, such as but not limited to Taylor Massey Creek, Wilket Creek, Patterson Creek and Pomona Creek. The confluence of the East and West Branches occurs approximately 6 kilometres upstream of the Impact Assessment Study Area. Downstream from the confluence, the sub-watershed is known as the Lower Don and includes all of the Don Narrows until reaching the Keating Channel. The entire watershed area or drainage basin of the Don River is approximately 360 square kilometres (Figure 3−1).
  • Directory of Institutions

    Directory of Institutions

    Ministry of Government Services Information Access & Privacy Directory of Institutions What is the Directory of Institutions? The Directory of Institutions lists and provides contact information for: • Ontario government ministries, agencies, community colleges and universities covered by FIPPA • Municipalities and other local public sector organizations such as school boards, library boards and police services covered by MFIPPA These organizations are all called "institutions" under the Acts. The address of the FIPPA or MFIPPA Coordinator for each institution is provided to assist you in directing requests for information to the correct place. FIPPA Coordinators • Provincial Ministries • Provincial Agencies, Boards and Commissions • Colleges and Universities • Hospitals MFIPPA Coordinators • Boards of Health • Community Development Corporations • Conservation Authorities • Entertainment Boards • District Social Services Administration Boards • Local Housing Corporations • Local Roads Boards • Local Services Boards • Municipal Corporations • Planning Boards • Police Service Boards • Public Library Boards • School Boards • Transit Commissions FIPPA Coordinators Provincial Ministries MINISTRY OF ABORIGINAL AFFAIRS Freedom of Information and Privacy Coordinator 160 Bloor Street East, 4th Floor Toronto, Ontario M7A 2E6 Phone: 416-326-4740 MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD AND RURAL AFFAIRS Freedom of Information and Privacy Coordinator 2nd Floor NW, 1 Stone Rd. W. Guelph, ON N1G 4Y2 Phone: 519-826-3100 ARCHIVES OF ONTARIO Freedom of Information and Privacy Coordinator 134 Ian Macdonald Blvd Toronto, ON M7A 2C5 Phone: 416-327-1563 MINISTRY OF GOVERNMENT AND CONSUMER SERVICES Freedom of Information and Privacy Coordinator 20 Dundas St. West, 4th Floor Toronto, ON M7A 1N3Phone: 416-325-2791 MINISTRY OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Freedom of Information and Privacy Coordinator McMurty-Scott Building 5th Floor, 720 Bay St.
  • Land Use Study: Development in Proximity to Rail Operations

    Land Use Study: Development in Proximity to Rail Operations

    Phase 1 Interim Report Land Use Study: Development in Proximity to Rail Operations City of Toronto Prepared for the City of Toronto by IBI Group and Stantec August 30, 2017 IBI GROUP PHASE 1 INTERIM REPORT LAND USE STUDY: DEVELOPMENT IN PROXIMITY TO RAIL OPERATIONS Prepared for City of Toronto Document Control Page CLIENT: City of Toronto City-Wide Land Use Study: Development in Proximity to Rail PROJECT NAME: Operations Land Use Study: Development in Proximity to Rail Operations REPORT TITLE: Phase 1 Interim Report - DRAFT IBI REFERENCE: 105734 VERSION: V2 - Issued August 30, 2017 J:\105734_RailProximit\10.0 Reports\Phase 1 - Data DIGITAL MASTER: Collection\Task 3 - Interim Report for Phase 1\TTR_CityWideLandUse_Phase1InterimReport_2017-08-30.docx ORIGINATOR: Patrick Garel REVIEWER: Margaret Parkhill, Steve Donald AUTHORIZATION: Lee Sims CIRCULATION LIST: HISTORY: Accessibility This document, as of the date of issuance, is provided in a format compatible with the requirements of the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA), 2005. August 30, 2017 IBI GROUP PHASE 1 INTERIM REPORT LAND USE STUDY: DEVELOPMENT IN PROXIMITY TO RAIL OPERATIONS Prepared for City of Toronto Table of Contents 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose of Study ..................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Background .............................................................................................................
  • Festival Guide

    Festival Guide

    FESTIVAL GUIDE DU GUÍA DEL GUIDE FESTIVAL FESTIVAL July 10–August 15, 2015 10 juillet au 15 août 2015 10 julio – 15 agosto 2015 LEAD PARTNER PARTENAIRE PRINCIPAL SOCIO PRINCIPAL PREMIER PARTNERS GRANDS PARTENAIRES SOCIOS PREMIERES OPENING CEREMONY CREATIVE PARTNER OFFICIAL BROADCASTER PARTENAIRE CRÉATIF POUR LA CÉRÉMONIE D’OUVERTURE DIFFUSEUR OFFICIEL SOCIO CREATIVO PARA LA CEREMONIA DE INAUGURACIÓN EMISORA OFICIAL OFFICIAL SUPPLIERS FOURNISSEURS OFFICIELS PROVEEDORES OFICIALES PROUD SUPPORTERS FIERS PARRAINEURS COLABORADORES PRINCIPALES Acklands-Grainger ATCO Structures & Logistics Ltd. Bochner Eye Institute BT/A Advertising Burnbrae Farms The Canadian Press Carbon60 Networks The Carpenters’ Union CGC Inc. Division Sports-Rep Inc. ELEIKO EllisDon-Ledcor Esri Canada eSSENTIAL Accessibility Freeman Audio Visual Canada Gateman-Milloy Inc. George Brown College Gerflor Gold Medal Systems La Presse LifeLabs Medical Laboratory Services MAC Cosmetics Minavox Modu-loc Fence Rentals Morningstar Hospitality Services Inc. Nautique Boats ONRoute Highway Service Centres Ontario Power Generation PortsToronto Riedel Communications Roots Rosetta Stone SpiderTech Sportsnet 590 The Fan S4OPTIK Starwood Hotels and Resorts TBM Service Group TLN Telelatino Toronto Port Lands Company UP Express VIA Rail Canada VOIT Vision Critical Waste Management Yonex YouAchieve ZOLL 407 ETR FUNDING PARTIES HOST CITY HOST FIRST NATION BAILLEURS DE FONDS VILLE HÔTE PREMIÈRE NATION HÔTE PROVEEDORES DE FINANCIAMIENTO CIUDAD ANFITRIONA PRIMERA NACIÓN ANFITRIONA Live Sites/Sites
  • Peer Review EA Study Design Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport BBTCA

    Peer Review EA Study Design Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport BBTCA

    Imagine the result Peer Review – EA Study Design Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport (BBTCA) Runway Expansion and Introduction of Jet Aircraft Final Report August 2015 BBTCA Peer Review of EA Study Design Report ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ii 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1-1 1.1 Background 1-1 1.2 Current Assignment 1-3 2.0 PEER REVIEW APPROACH 2-1 2.1 Methodology 2-1 3.0 FINDINGS OF PEER REVIEW OF AECOM’S DRAFT STUDY DESIGN REPORT 3-1 3.1 EA Process and Legislation 3-1 3.2 Public Consultation & Stakeholder Engagement 3-1 3.3 Air Quality 3-2 3.4 Public Health 3-5 3.5 Noise 3-6 3.6 Natural Environment 3-10 3.7 Socio-Economic Conditions 3-11 3.8 Land Use & Built Form 3-14 3.9 Marine Physical Conditions and Water Quality 3-15 3.10 Transportation 3-15 3.11 Archaeology & Cultural Heritage 3-18 4.0 SUMMARY RECOMMENDATIONS 4-1 APPENDIX A Presentation Given to the Working Group (22 June 2015) B Presentation of Draft Phase I Peer Review Report Results (13 July 2015) i BBTCA Peer Review of EA Study Design Report ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS AERMOD Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling System ARCADIS ARCADIS Canada Inc. BBTCA Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport CALPUFF Meteorological and Air Quality Monitoring System CCG Canadian Coast Guard CEAA Canadian Environmental Assessment Act CO Carbon Monoxide COPA Canadian Owners and Pilots Association dBA Decibel Values of Sounds EA Environmental Assessment EC Environment Canada GBE Government Business Enterprise GWC Greater Waterfront Coalition HEAT Habitat and Environmental Assessment Tool INM Integrated Noise Model Ldn Day-Night
  • The Fish Communities of the Toronto Waterfront: Summary and Assessment 1989 - 2005

    The Fish Communities of the Toronto Waterfront: Summary and Assessment 1989 - 2005

    THE FISH COMMUNITIES OF THE TORONTO WATERFRONT: SUMMARY AND ASSESSMENT 1989 - 2005 SEPTEMBER 2008 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors wish to thank the many technical staff, past and present, of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority and Ministry of Natural Resources who diligently collected electrofishing data for the past 16 years. The completion of this report was aided by the Canada Ontario Agreement (COA). 1 Jason P. Dietrich, 1 Allison M. Hennyey, 1 Rick Portiss, 1 Gord MacPherson, 1 Kelly Montgomery and 2 Bruce J. Morrison 1 Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, 5 Shoreham Drive, Downsview, ON, M3N 1S4, Canada 2 Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Lake Ontario Fisheries Management Unit, Glenora Fisheries Station, Picton, ON, K0K 2T0, Canada © Toronto and Region Conservation 2008 ABSTRACT Fish community metrics collected for 16 years (1989 — 2005), using standardized electrofishing methods, throughout the greater Toronto region waterfront, were analyzed to ascertain the current state of the fish community with respect to past conditions. Results that continue to indicate a degraded or further degrading environment include an overall reduction in fish abundance, a high composition of benthivores, an increase in invasive species, an increase in generalist species biomass, yet a decrease in specialist species biomass, and a decrease in cool water Electrofishing in the Toronto Harbour thermal guild species biomass in embayments. Results that may indicate a change in a positive community health direction include no significant changes to species richness, a marked increase in diversity in embayments, a decline in non-native species in embayments and open coasts (despite the invasion of round goby), a recent increase in native species biomass, fluctuating native piscivore dynamics, increased walleye abundance, and a reduction in the proportion of degradation tolerant species.
  • Sec 2-Core Circle

    Sec 2-Core Circle

    TRANSFORMATIVE IDEA 1. THE CORE CIRCLE Re-imagine the valleys, bluffs and islands encircling the Downtown as a fully interconnected 900-hectare immersive landscape system THE CORE CIRLE 30 THE CORE CIRLE PUBLIC WORK 31 TRANSFORMATIVE IDEA 1. THE CORE CIRCLE N The Core Circle re-imagines the valleys, bluffs and islands E encircling the Downtown as a fully connected 900-hectare immersive landscape system W S The Core Circle seeks to improve and offer opportunities to reconnect the urban fabric of the Downtown to its surrounding natural features using the streets, parks and open spaces found around the natural setting of Downtown Toronto including the Don River Valley and ravines, Lake Ontario, the Toronto Islands, Garrison Creek and the Lake Iroquois shoreline. Connecting these large landscape features North: Davenport Road Bluff, Toronto, Canada will create a continuous circular network of open spaces surrounding the Downtown, accessible from both the core and the broader city. The Core Circle re- imagines the Downtown’s framework of valleys, bluffs and islands as a connected 900-hectare landscape system and immersive experience, building on Toronto’s strong identity as a ‘city within a park’ and providing opportunities to acknowledge our natural setting and connect to the history of our natural landscapes. East: Don River Valley Ravine and Rosedale Valley Ravine, Toronto, Canada Historically, the natural landscape features that form the Core Circle were used by Indigenous peoples as village sites, travelling routes and hunting and gathering lands. They are regarded as sacred landscapes and places for spiritual renewal. The Core Circle seeks to re-establish our connection to these landscapes.