DOCSLIB.ORG

Office of the Secretary of Defense § 158.9

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Office of the Secretary of Defense § 158.9 Office of the Secretary of Defense § 158.9 ‘‘ELINT,’’ ‘‘electronic security,’’ ‘‘en- (r) Forward Area Alerting Radar cipher,’’ ‘‘encode,’’ ‘‘encrypt,’’ ‘‘inter- (FAAR) System. cept,’’ ‘‘key book,’’ ‘‘signals intel- (s) Ground laser designators. ligence’’ or ‘‘SIGINT,’’ ‘‘signal secu- (t) Hawk Guided Missile System. rity,’’ and ‘‘TEMPEST.’’ (u) Heliborne, Laser, Air Defense Suppression and Fire and Forget Guid- § 158.8 Categories of information that ed Missile System (HELLFIRE). require review before declassifica- tion: Department of the Army sys- (v) Honest John Missile System. tems. (w) Lance Field Artillery Missile System. The following categories of Army in- (x) Land Combat Support System formation shall be reviewed systemati- (LCSS). cally for declassification by designated DoD reviewers in accordance with this (y) M22 (SS–11 ATGM) Guided Missile part. System, Helicopter Armament Sub- (a) Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) system. missile information, including the (z) Guided Missile System, Air De- principle of operation of warheads fense (NIKE HERCULES with Improved (fuzing, arming, and destruct oper- Capabilities with HIPAR and ations); quality or reliability require- ANTIJAM Improvement). ments; threat data; vulnerability; ECM (aa) Patriot Air Defense Missile Sys- and ECCM); details of design, assem- tem. bly, and construction; and principle of (bb) Pershing IA Guided Missile Sys- operations. tem. (b) BMD systems data, including the (cc) Pershing II Guided Missile Sys- concept definition (tentative roles, tem. threat definition, and analysis and ef- (dd) Guided Missile System, Inter- fectiveness); detailed quantitative cept Aerial M41 (REDEYE) and Associ- technical system description-revealing ated Equipment. capabilities or unique weaknesses that (ee) U.S. Roland Missile System. are exploitable; overall assessment of (ff) Sergeant Missile System (less specific threat-revealing vulnerability warhead) (as pertains to electronics or capability; discrimination tech- and penetration aids only). nology; and details of operational con- (gg) Shillelagh Missile System. cepts. (hh) Stinger/Stinger-Post Guided (c) BMD optics information that may Missile System (FIM–92A). provide signature characteristics of (ii) Terminally Guided Warhead U.S. and United Kingdom ballistic (TWG) for Multiple Launch Rocket weapons. System (MLRS). (d) Shaped-charge technology. (jj) TOW Heavy Antitank Weapon (e) Fleshettes. System. (f) M380 Beehive round. (kk) Viper Light Antitank/Assault (g) Electromagnetic propulsion tech- Weapon System. nology. (h) Space weapons concepts. § 158.9 Categories of information that (i) Radar-fuzing programs. require review before declassifica- (j) Guided projectiles technology. tion: Department of the Navy sys- (k) ECM and ECCM to weapons sys- tems. tems. The following categories of Navy in- (l) Armor materials concepts, de- formation shall be reviewed systemati- signs, or research. cally for declassification by designated (m) 2.75-inch Rocket System. DoD reviewers in accordance with this (n) Air Defense Command and Coordi- part. nation System (AN/TSQ–51). (a) Naval nuclear propulsion informa- (o) Airborne Target Acquisition and tion. Fire Control System. (b) Conventional surface ship infor- (p) Chaparral Missile System. mation: (q) Dragon Guided Missile System (1) Vulnerabilities of protective sys- Surface Attack, M47. tems, specifically: 583 VerDate Jul<25>2002 15:04 Jul 31, 2002 Jkt 197117 PO 00000 Frm 00583 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\197117T.XXX pfrm15 PsN: 197117T § 158.10 32 CFR Ch. I (7–1–02 Edition) (i) Passive protection information (2) Tactical performance, tactical concerning ballistic torpedo and under- doctrine, and vulnerability to counter- bottom protective systems. measures. (ii) Weapon protection requirement (i) Design performance and func- levels for conventional, nuclear, bio- tional characteristics of guided mis- logical, or chemical weapons. siles, guided projectiles, sonars, radars, (iii) General arrangements, drawings, acoustic equipments, and fire control and booklets of general plans (applica- systems. ble to carriers only). (2) Ship-silencing information rel- § 158.10 Categories of information that ative to: require review before declassifica- (i) Signatures (acoustic, seismic, in- tion: Department of the Air Force frared, magnetic (including alternating systems. magnetic (AM)), pressure, and under- The Department of the Air Force has water electric potential (UEP)). determined that the categories identi- (ii) Procedures and techniques for fied in § 158.7 of this part shall apply to noise reduction pertaining to an indi- Air Force information. vidual ship’s component. (iii) Vibration data relating to hull § 158.11 Declassification consider- and machinery. ations. (3) Operational characteristics re- (a) Technological developments; lated to performance as follows: widespread public knowledge of the (i) Endurance or total fuel capacity. subject matter; changes in military (ii) Tactical information, such as plans, operations, systems, or equip- times for ship turning, zero to max- ment; changes in the foreign relations imum speed, and maximum to zero or defense commitments of the United speed. States; and similar events may bear (c) All information that is uniquely upon the determination of whether in- applicable to nuclear-powered surface formation should be declassified. If the ships or submarines. responsible DoD reviewer decides that, (d) Information concerning diesel in view of such circumstances, the pub- submarines as follows: lic disclosure of the information being (1) Ship-silencing data or acoustic reviewed no longer would result in warfare systems relative to: damage to the national security, the (i) Overside, platform, and sonar information shall be declassified. noise signature. (b) The following are examples of (ii) Radiated noise and echo response. considerations that may be appropriate (iii) All vibration data. in deciding whether information in the (iv) Seismic, magnetic (including categories listed in §§ 158.7 through AM), pressure, and UEP signature data. 158.10 may be declassified when it is re- (2) Details of operational assign- viewed: ments, that is, war plans, antisub- (1) The information no longer pro- marine warfare (ASW), and surveil- vides the United States a scientific, en- lance tasks. gineering, technical, operational, intel- (3) General arrangements, drawings, ligence, strategic, or tactical advan- and plans of SS563 class submarine tage over other nations. hulls. (2) The operational military capa- (e) Sound Surveillance System bility of the United States revealed by (SOSUS) data. the information no longer constitutes a (f) Information concerning mine war- limitation on the effectiveness of the fare, mine sweeping, and mine counter- Armed Forces. measures. (3) The information is pertinent to a (g) ECM or ECCM features and capa- system that no longer is used or relied bilities of any electronic equipment. on for the defense of the United States (h) Torpedo information as follows: or its allies and does not disclose the (1) Torpedo countermeasures devices: capabilities or vulnerabilities of exist- T–MK6 (FANFARE) and NAE beacons. ing operational systems. 584 VerDate Jul<25>2002 15:04 Jul 31, 2002 Jkt 197117 PO 00000 Frm 00584 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\197117T.XXX pfrm15 PsN: 197117T.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Historic Context of the Nike Missile Site
    HISTORIC CONTEXT OF THE NIKE MISSILE SITE The NIKE Missile sites were the first nationwide U.S. air defense system designed to protect against a Soviet nuclear attack. In the 1950s, they were highly visible, powerful symbols of U.S. military power as well as the Soviet threat. The sites were the outgrowth of an increasing concern over the Soviet ability to equip jet aircraft with nuclear bombs, and continued to develop into an early defense against Inter-Continental Ballistic Missiles (ICBMs). During World War II, the U.S. military began to experiment with missiles and rockets in response to the German rocket program. In 1943, the U.S. Army established the Rocket Branch of the Ordnance Corps, and in 1945 recruited Bell Laboratories and the Douglas Aircraft Company as part of the team (USACE 1997:5; Bright 1997:321). Although Bell Laboratories and Douglas had completed a prototype weapon by 1946, funding cutbacks after the war delayed further progress. In 1951, Western Electric, then the prime contractor of the project, had developed a 34-foot, two- stage missile guided by a system of three radars. The new missile could travel at Mach 2 (Bright 1997:321). This missile used a highly volatile liquid fuel composed of jet fuel and nitric acid, and had to be handled with full protective gear in specially constructed magazines. This was exceptionally revolutionary and complex technology for the time. The first radar would identify the target 125 miles away, the second would track the target, and a third would track the missile's course and alter it in response to the target tracking radar.
    [Show full text]
  • Army Ballistic Missile Programs at Cape Canaveral 1953 – 1988
    ARMY BALLISTIC MISSILE PROGRAMS AT CAPE CANAVERAL 1953 – 1988 by Mark C. Cleary 45th SPACE WING History Office TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface…………………………………………………… iii INTRODUCTION……………………………………… 1 REDSTONE……………………………………………… 15 JUPITER…………………………………………………. 44 PERSHING………………………………………………. 68 CONCLUSION………………………………………….. 90 ii Preface The United States Army has sponsored far fewer launches on the Eastern Range than either the Air Force or the Navy. Only about a tenth of the range’s missile and space flights can be attributed to Army programs, versus more than a third sponsored by each of the other services. Nevertheless, numbers seldom tell the whole story, and we would be guilty of a grave disservice if we overlooked the Army’s impressive achievements in the development of rocket- powered vehicles, missile guidance systems, and reentry vehicle technologies from the late 1940s onward. Several years of experimental flights were conducted at the White Sands Proving Ground before the Army sponsored the first two ballistic missile launches from Cape Canaveral, Florida, in July 1950. In June 1950, the Army moved some of its most important guided missile projects from Fort Bliss, Texas, to Redstone Arsenal near Huntsville, Alabama. Work began in earnest on the REDSTONE ballistic missile program shortly thereafter. In many ways, the early Army missile programs set the tone for the development of other ballistic missiles and range instrumentation by other military branches in the 1950s. PERSHING missile launches continued at the Cape in the 1960s, and they were followed by PERSHING 1A and PERSHING II launches in the 1970s and 1980s. This study begins with a summary of the major events leading up to the REDSTONE missile program at Cape Canaveral.
    [Show full text]
  • Ballistic, Cruise Missile, and Missile Defense Systems: Trade and Significant Developments, June 1994-September 1994
    Missile Developments BALLISTIC, CRUISE MISSILE, AND MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEMS: TRADE AND SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENTS, JUNE 1994-SEPTEMBER 1994 RUSSIA WITH AFGHANISTAN AND AFGHANISTAN TAJIKISTAN AUSTRALIA 8/10/94 According to Russian military forces in Dushanbe, the 12th post of the Moscow INTERNAL DEVELOPMENTS border troops headquarters in Tajikistan is INTERNAL DEVELOPMENTS attacked by missiles fired from Afghan ter- 9/27/94 ritory. The Russians respond with suppres- 7/94 Rocket and mortar attacks leave 58 people sive fire on the missile launcher emplace- It is reported that Australia’s University of dead and 224 wounded in Kabul. Kabul ment; no casualties are reported. Queensland can produce a scramjet air- radio attributes this attack to factions op- Itar-Tass (Moscow), 8/11/94; in FBIS-SOV-94-155, breathing engine, which may offer payload posing President Burhanuddin Rabbani. 8/11/94, p. 36 (4564). and cost advantages over conventional SLVs. More than 100 rockets and mortar shells Chris Schacht, Australian (Sydney), 7/20/94, p. 6; are fired on residential areas of Kabul by 8/27/94 in FBIS-EAS-94-152, 8/8/94, pp. 89-90 (4405). anti-Rabbani militia under the control of During the early morning hours, Tajik Prime Minister Gulbuddin Hekmatyar and Mujaheedin launch several missiles at the 7/94 northern warlord General Abdul Rashid Russian Frontier Guard observation posi- It is reported that the Australian government Dostam. tion and post on the Turk Heights in awarded Australia’s AWA Defence Industries Wall Street Journal, 9/28/94, p. 1 (4333). Tajikistan. The missiles are launched from (AWADI) a $17 million contract to produce the area of the Afghan-Tajik border and from the Active Missile Decoy (AMD) system, a Afghan territory, according to the second “hovering rocket-propelled anti-ship missile commander of Russian border guards in decoy system” providing for ship defense against sea-skimming missiles.
    [Show full text]
  • Jacques Tiziou Space Collection
    Jacques Tiziou Space Collection Isaac Middleton and Melissa A. N. Keiser 2019 National Air and Space Museum Archives 14390 Air & Space Museum Parkway Chantilly, VA 20151 [email protected] https://airandspace.si.edu/archives Table of Contents Collection Overview ........................................................................................................ 1 Administrative Information .............................................................................................. 1 Biographical / Historical.................................................................................................... 1 Scope and Contents........................................................................................................ 2 Arrangement..................................................................................................................... 2 Names and Subjects ...................................................................................................... 2 Container Listing ............................................................................................................. 4 Series : Files, (bulk 1960-2011)............................................................................... 4 Series : Photography, (bulk 1960-2011)................................................................. 25 Jacques Tiziou Space Collection NASM.2018.0078 Collection Overview Repository: National Air and Space Museum Archives Title: Jacques Tiziou Space Collection Identifier: NASM.2018.0078 Date: (bulk 1960s through
    [Show full text]
  • Air Base Defense Rethinking Army and Air Force Roles and Functions for More Information on This Publication, Visit
    C O R P O R A T I O N ALAN J. VICK, SEAN M. ZEIGLER, JULIA BRACKUP, JOHN SPEED MEYERS Air Base Defense Rethinking Army and Air Force Roles and Functions For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR4368 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0500-5 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2020 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface The growing cruise and ballistic missile threat to U.S. Air Force bases in Europe has led Headquarters U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Archie to SAM a Short Operational History of Ground-Based Air Defense
    Archie to SAM A Short Operational History of Ground-Based Air Defense Second Edition KENNETH P. WERRELL Air University Press Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama August 2005 Air University Library Cataloging Data Werrell, Kenneth P. Archie to SAM : a short operational history of ground-based air defense / Kenneth P. Werrell.—2nd ed. —p. ; cm. Rev. ed. of: Archie, flak, AAA, and SAM : a short operational history of ground- based air defense, 1988. With a new preface. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-58566-136-8 1. Air defenses—History. 2. Anti-aircraft guns—History. 3. Anti-aircraft missiles— History. I. Title. 358.4/145—dc22 Disclaimer Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of Air University, the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or any other US government agency. Cleared for public re- lease: distribution unlimited. Air University Press 131 West Shumacher Avenue Maxwell AFB AL 36112-6615 http://aupress.maxwell.af.mil ii In memory of Michael Lewis Hyde Born 14 May 1938 Graduated USAF Academy 8 June 1960 Killed in action 8 December 1966 A Patriot, A Classmate, A Friend THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Contents Chapter Page DISCLAIMER . ii DEDICATION . iii FOREWORD . xiii ABOUT THE AUTHOR . xv PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION . xvii PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION . xix ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . xxi 1 ANTIAIRCRAFT DEFENSE THROUGH WORLD WAR II . 1 British Antiaircraft Artillery . 4 The V-1 Campaign . 13 American Antiaircraft Artillery . 22 German Flak . 24 Allied Countermeasures . 42 Fratricide . 46 The US Navy in the Pacific .
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Weapons Databook, Volume I 3 Stockpile
    3 Stockpile Chapter Three USNuclear Stockpile This section describes the 24 types of warheads cur- enriched uranium (oralloy) as its nuclear fissile material rently in the U.S. nuclear stockpile. As of 1983, the total and is considered volatile and unsafe. As a result, its number of warheads was an estimated 26,000. They are nuclear materials and fuzes are kept separately from the made in a wide variety of configurations with over 50 artillery projectile. The W33 can be used in two differ- different modifications and yields. The smallest war- ent yield configurations and requires the assembly and head is the man-portable nuclear land mine, known as insertion of distinct "pits" (nuclear materials cores) with the "Special Atomic Demolition Munition" (SADM). the amount of materials determining a "low" or '4high'' The SADM weighs only 58.5 pounds and has an explo- yield. sive yield (W54) equivalent to as little as 10 tons of TNT, In contrast, the newest of the nuclear warheads is the The largest yield is found in the 165 ton TITAN I1 mis- W80,5 a thermonuclear warhead built for the long-range sile, which carries a four ton nuclear warhead (W53) Air-Launched Cruise Missile (ALCM) and first deployed equal in explosive capability to 9 million tons of TNT, in late 1981. The W80 warhead has a yield equivalent to The nuclear weapons stockpile officially includes 200 kilotons of TNT (more than 20 times greater than the only those nuclear missile reentry vehicles, bombs, artil- W33), weighs about the same as the W33, utilizes the lery projectiles, and atomic demolition munitions that same material (oralloy), and, through improvements in are in "active service."l Active service means those electronics such as fuzing and miniaturization, repre- which are in the custody of the Department of Defense sents close to the limits of technology in building a high and considered "war reserve weapons." Excluded are yield, safe, small warhead.
    [Show full text]
  • Dod Financial Management Regulation Volume 15, Appendix B
    DoD Financial Management Regulation Volume 15, Appendix B APPENDIX B - NONRECURRING COSTS RECOUPMENT CHARGES MAJOR DEFENSE EQUIPMENT Approved Effectivec,d Item Description Charge Date CATEGORY I - FIREARMS Rifle, 5.56mm M-16 Series (A) [No Charge] Gun, Machine, 7.62mm, M240 (A) 65.07 28 Mar 89 Gun, Machine, 50 CAL, M-2 (A) 1.82 28 Mar 89 CATEGORY II - ARTILLERY AND PROJECTILES Gun, M-61, 20mm (AF) 1,342.00 6 Dec 84 Gun, GAU-8, 30mm (AF) 27,881.00 22 Jan 81 Gun Pod, GPU-5/A, 30mm (AF) 60,239.00 11 Aug 82 Howitzer, Towed, 105mm, M101A1 (A) 850.00 11 Jun 87 Howitzer, Towed, 155mm, M198 (A) 47,483.00 14 Feb 86 CATEGORY III - AMMUNITION Cartridge, 20mm (A) (a) Cartridge, 30mm (GAU-8) (AF) .50 28 Mar 89 Cartridge, 40mm, HE (A) .11 28 Mar 89 Cartridge, 40mm, HE, M406 (A) .01 Cartridge, 40mm, M385 Dummy .19 15 May 91 Cartridge, 40mm, FXD HEDP M433 SNGL RD 72/BX (A) .43 15 May 91 Cartridge, 60mm, HE (A) .47 28 Mar 89 Cartridge, 60mm, HE, M49A2/A3/A4 (A) (a) Cartridge, 60mm, HE, M720 W/FMO M734 (LAP) (A) 5.00 15 May 91 Cartridge, 81mm, ILLUM (M301)(only) (A) .04 7 May 81 Cartridge, 81mm, HE, M374A2/A3 (A) (a) Cartridge, 81mm, HE, M374A3 W/M567 Fuze (A) 3.24 15 May 91 Cartridge, 105mm, APFSDS-T M735 (A) 68.00 28 Mar 89 Cartridge, 105mm, APFSDS-T M833 88.00 5 Jul 91 Cartridge, 105mm, M490 (A) .57 7 May 81 Cartridge, 105mm, M724Al (A) 1.42 7 May 81 Cartridge, 105mm, APFSDS-T M774 (A) (a) Cartridge, 105mm, APFSDS-T M774 2/BX (A) 24.00 15 May 91 Cartridge, 105mm, HEAT-T MP M456 (A) 3.59 7 May 81 Cartridge, 105mm, HE, HEP-T, M393A2 (A) (a) Cartridge,
    [Show full text]
  • Canada Aviation and Space Museum Aircraft
    CANADA AVIATION AND SPACE MUSEUM AIRCRAFT RYAN KDA-4 FIREBEE DRONE ROYAL CANADIAN AIR FORCE SERIAL KD-4788 INTRODUCTION The Ryan Firebee began as a series of target drones (now more commonly referred to as unmanned aerial vehicles or UAVs) 1 developed by the Ryan Aeronautical Company (later Teledyne Ryan), beginning in 1951. It was one of the first jet-propelled drones, and, eventually, one of the most successful and widely used target drones ever built. Generally referred to as the Firebee I, the initial versions possessed high subsonic speed, and were primarily intended for use in ground-to-air and air-to-air gunnery training. Later versions were developed into reconnaissance vehicles, as well as into attack and multi-mission platforms. More than 7,000 Firebee vehicles were built, with many variants being introduced. A Ryan publicity photo illustrating the first customers for the Ryan Firebee: the United States Air Force, the United States Navy, the United States Army and the Royal Canadian Air Force. - (Ryan Aeronautical Company Photo) The Royal Canadian Air Force (RCAF) became one of the first customers for the Firebee intending the target drone to be used in particular for the planned weapons testing and training on the Avro Canada CF-105 Arrow fighter program. The Firebee has the distinction of being the first UAV in the RCAF. Cover Photo Caption - The Ryan Firebee was launched from a modified Lancaster bomber in RCAF service. - (RCAF Photo) 1 / 22 ______________________________________________________________________ FIREBEE DESIGN HISTORY 2 Q-2 / KDA-1 Firebee The Firebee was the result of a 1946 United States Army Air Force (USAAF) request for a jet-powered gunnery target.
    [Show full text]
  • Nike Ajax and Hercules Plans and Records Collections
    Nike Ajax and Hercules Plans and Records Collection, 1943 - 1978 GOGA 35344 Nike Hercules missile graphic from “Lesson 1. Introduction to the Improved Nike Herculese [sic] Missile System;” see appendix Golden Gate National Recreation Area Park Archives and Records Center Building 201, Fort Mason San Francisco, CA 94123 Phone: 415-561-2807 Fax: 415-441-1618 Susan Ewing Haley, Park Archivist Table of Contents Introduction Acknowledgements 3 Golden Gate National Recreation Area 3 Park Archives and Record Center 3 Nike Ajax and Hercules Plans and Records Collection Scope and Content Title 4 Dates 4 Collection Number 4 Creator 4 Volume 4 Provenance 4 Scope and Content Note 4 Significance 5 Condition 5 Entries 6 Preferred Citation 6 Processing Information 6 History 6 Series Description 8 Folder List 12 Appendix 23 Lesson 1. Introduction to the 23 Improved Nike Herculese [sic] Missile System from the Nike Historical Society, http://www.nikemissile.org/ or Ed Thelen’s Nike site, http://ed-thelen.org/MMS-150.html GOGA 35344 2 Introduction Acknowledgements This collection’s further arrangement would not have been possible without the dedicated work of John Martini, who performed initial description of this series from the Army Engineering Plans Collection: Forts Baker, Barry, Cronkhite, Funston, & Miley. I would also like to gratefully acknowledge Park Archivist Susan Ewing Haley and Assistant Archivist Amanda Williford; their guidance and advice have made this an excellent processing experience. Golden Gate National Recreation Area The Golden Gate National Recreation Area (GGNRA) was created in 1972 as the largest urban recreation area in the United States. The history and culture contained within span an extraordinary timeframe with a rich layering of themes and subject matter.
    [Show full text]
  • Tactical References Included in Those Patches You Will Find Details on Over 130 New Additional Weapons and Stores
    Tactical Reference for Falcon 4.0 1 Tactical Reference for Falcon 4.0 Tactical Reference Munitions Handbook 2 Tactical Reference for Falcon 4.0 Rev. 2.0 3 Tactical Reference for Falcon 4.0 TABEL OF CONTENTS TABEL OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................... 4 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................................... 10 SOURCES AND RESOURCES ....................................................................................................................... 11 US/ALLIED MUNITIONS CHAPTER .............................................................................................................. 12 FREE FALL BOMBS .................................................................................................................................... 12 B-53 .............................................................................................................................................. 12 B-61 .............................................................................................................................................. 13 B-83 .............................................................................................................................................. 14 BLU-1/B ........................................................................................................................................ 15 BLU-10/A
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Nine Army Nuclear Weapons
    9 Army Nuclear Weapons Chapter Nine Army Nuclear Weapons The Army1 uses a wide variety of nuclear weapon sys- ish, Dutch, Italian, and West German armies. LANCE tems-medium range PERSHING la and short-range replaced HONEST JOHN in all of these countries, more LANCE surface-to-surface missiles, NIKE-HERCULES than doubling the range and accuracy over the older surface-to-air missiles, 155mm and 8-inch (203mm) artil- missile, and providing greater mobility and reliability. lery, and atomic demolition munitions (nuclear land A new warhead for the LANCE, an enhanced radiation mines). The HONEST JOHN surface-to-surface rocket, version of the W70 (Mod 3) produced in 1981-1983, is although withdrawn from active U.S. use, is nuclear being stored in the U.S. and awaits shipment to armed with some NATO allies. Army nuclear weapons Europe. The HONEST JOHN short-range free-flight are deployed with U.S. combat units throughout the rocket, first deployed in 1954, remains deployed with United States, Europe, in South Korea, and among allied W31 nuclear warheads in the Greek and Turkish military forces. They vary in range from manually armies. No plans are currently known for the replace- emplaced land mines to 460 miles, and in yield from sub ment of HONEST JOHN in the above forces with the (0.01) to 400 kilotons. LANCE, but they will be obsolete in the late 1980s and The PERSHING la is the longest range and highest impossible to support. A nuclear armed LANCE yield Army nuclear weapon currently deployed. One replacement is under development, called the Corps hundred and eighty launchers, with more than 300 mis- Support Weapon System, as part of the Army-Air Force siles, all armed with W50 nuclear warheads, are Joint Tactical Missile System program to investigate deployed in West Germany with the U.S.
    [Show full text]