Miami News Dated " - . ,? A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Miami News Dated - -- _ -- _I&#39;_-l-__-g, - -. V. -@- - ._,_92.., - - &#39;&#39;-"1-"-Ii "~" » &#39;_ -- &#39; .- --.- - ~» =-I7&#39;~I."&#39;.» -f.~&#39;<"v-&#39;/L.:1&#39;T~-"":_&#39;-&#39;-""_!&#39;-&#39;-&#39;7-l?&#39;$1§;! II -4=3-~&#39;-<--= m,.,.=§..~_. .1.»-I-. 92-92.u1 Q I-.~_._-&#39;. V _..t.a;Z.,,.:,92.-92_.&#39;;¢,&#39;§_.-92.192&#39;+v._.4:3..-~.in..4i_Lu=z._»¢l:#»kli592&#39;1-l-I~Hl-"-Jr1a92-an: . - - o. - L...-e-l:;...-:_.~ .» *-- :-- 1 - -.&#39;1~&#39; .¢- . l ."~ . .. ,1--¢~t». -H92"-71"»"-_&#39;j,_._";.;"&&#39;.Ii3.i;f.JZn=.i§.-1:.utlui&#39;.5-i::i.1J92k1,l_o."11&#39;-TE.-;»92.Z¬I:|£r; _ _ _ __ . , _ ._ __ .. q,-. - - Jr ,<_ -Y _- - _ _&#39;-; :"-.1. 1. E_ _- . Q * .__-vtrit * _ _-;- ::_¬_J_ jm _____~;___ &#39; :_ . _ l - I 4. _ Z-Q. __. 0 _ . 92.a-_--_-@-- ,, ..:~ -... .-.._ - _- pk!"-5 _ _..._,.¢..~..7. &#39;~. _-_ .2,*/&#39; &#39;e " _ : &#39;-&#39; . -- &#39;_ . &#39; &#39;7 . &#39; V_ _ 7"?-&#39; ~. &#39; s---&#39; -- """ .1 -- -:|&#39; ._ .- e .- .- - &#39; - -<=~ | _ oy-,. .. -ff ._ ,.. ._._ _ _.|~ -.__ _ .. _ .- __-&#39; t _ _ _ . _ <__ _ _ . - _ 7 J__>W: _ ,-1- __ -" .. _ L I. -. M - _ _ _ _ ,- -,-Q _¢ . - - .1 ~ -7",, r-__.. :- &#39;- - _ 3 -»__ _ , » ~-_, _ -&#39;4&#39; 0, _ * - -.¢ ~ ~"- ».---» - &#39;-- - -- - . - ,., - ___. _ _. - - . - en--__ -72- , _ . .:. - -_-. 92 - _ H. b -.1: -. _ - H - - -., __,¬,:¢. - - R, 92 _ _ 5- - &#39;.._ ., . - , 1. .r &#39;_-"= &#39; - .&#39; I . :=.~ . &#39; &#39; Q . I _ M> . 1 _ _ . _ . _. »_-&#39; _ _ _ ._ . - . Logust l, 1973 &#39; . 7 ,_ - -. - V - ":--9 .&#39; 7 1 I * V 1»-m.- ~ ~ ~ Honorable Donald c. mama er -&#39;1 Mr? * . cm:mi5&#39;s5_DnEr&#39; _ I _ ; . " ~ ~&#39;i,§;&#39;-&#39;~.?;§-;ii;~":;;.: 1 e Internal 3,5?-en,_;&#39;a Service - _ &#39; _ ,l -<:_ * *- i_"i;-"&#39;.-:.7;~5:"-&#39;3-ii? ; t L - Bspértnent of the Treas111:y_ - e - 2 _ s _- . Washington, n. c. 2:222»: Y ole Y» oi , ~.., . &#39;,6,» 55,-, ,_,,_.=m,,,,,1lml so s ____ i _ . _ ,;_¢ , A. , .. "- . -,"&#39;¢.v-4-~~ .&#39; . "_ -" - 1. I "92.&#39;- I. ,--7&#39;9-&#39;2&#39;." ,_. &#39; _ On July 2s, 19-:3, information-was brought,-to my?-A =- _ e_ &#39;personal attention which I feel would be of interest to -- _t .-n 92~~ .._ __ you and your agency. j .1. :_ L-__§ Q -. --;_-_:;=¢ . , _ . - ~_-.._- -_ , &#39; -.---&#39;_- P -- -&#39; ?<;*-&#39;PF :1 -." &#39; . -. &#39; 92 V "-&#39; --&#39;lr""- . _ . - -_,- _ On Jone 18, 1373, "Hr, ,C11ar1es__G.&#39; Rebpzo, s . &#39; "I." &#39; irisncl oz the President, t&#39;og&#39;ether&#39;with h:1.s.atto:mey, a z 9.; Hr, Wakefield, met w._i.th_t S5»:-Loial Agent in _¬!_harga&#39;lKe_n.o_m_;h- L 1ifr1__&#39;jjjffj"-3;_ § Whitter of the éiismi Office of _1:.he_EBI at Hr. Rebozo&#39;s f F -"".&#39;!. 5 &#39;ll &#39;.&#39;=_&#39;§f"&#39;_"-""-&#39;¢<1&#39;92?-est. 3-Ir. -Rebozo ~des:Lred; $ir.&#39;*-Whi-ttaker&#39;s advice as "t:o&#39;-11} - -- whatheiqcertain moneys in_h.isposse_asion in the?-mou&#39;nt&#39;of &#39; ""*=-;-Ti; _ - $100,009-1x1&#39;$];0Db1lls could beescanined by anyone. to it .1 7 determine the length o£time&#39; such moneys had been retained,-e &#39;_ 1 in a safe deoosit box. L-11.. Rebozo-was infoilrmed that altho --__,_ 1-&#39;_ tho.:E;.na1 answer would, have to come from the I-BI Laboratory, . - - the condition would be _a detemioing factor; however, sioce .i_&#39;§ " 1- . -_ most safe deposit bums in hanks are in air-conditioned. &#39; * ti -ji, _- surroundings, the moneys would most likely not be susceptible ?_, _ type 1-l ;: &#39; -- to;this . of&#39; ._exam3.nat1~on-suocessful1y..;.;_;§ . Hr. Rebozo explaine to Hr. Whittaker amathe my "7__ _ H . received $50,060 from n1o1:&#39;Da.nne.::- in 1959, which he was told _ Q _ . was from Howard Hughes to be applies to the Republican 7- i 2 ._ . 9Q119&#39;1&#39;essiona1§1&#39;T5°tions in 19&#39;?!! as iiesired, A short-tinial-5&#39;|= _. -_ later he, Rebozo, had receivedmanother $50,000 £¢i=7i-.na ._ . &#39;<,"._._,,;§ purpose from Banner. allegedly, from the same source; that is F f_;;~} ._ &#39;Hr. Hughes. -w . &#39; 7- 7. -- - ~- &#39; _ . j - Hr. Pebozo stated he keptthe may an-at safe deposit"=-1&#39;§ j box intening to give :i.t__to whoever was Republican Party .- _ _oha;.:-nyan, when, all of a. sudden, Hughes, Danneoand n -- . 1 mode national -publicity through a. big fight when efforts were §§ . &#39;-. _ being made to wrest control of the hugs Hughes financial 1;-;i_&#39;;;f_§;g§:§¢j;5 &#39;1. " &#39;Amiro. ._ Rebozo said because-pi this he decided. not to give]*5F;l1i{*?1;*$_ &#39;5-3 .:" . 7 L! »*?§ - e . 7..&#39; e - °. l l &#39;&#39; L35//1&#39; &#39; &#39; eini:LB$92.m5, V -. =~.".~,92.-H .92&#39;- -__&#39; "..&#39; ;.-&#39;,- --...,-._ ,. .__,&#39;¢_;,;.;-,-_ ;--,---.-_¢ .! ", . _." , ,.>- __ _ --.4 _ ,- . &#39;..__.r-- -., __ ,_ _ , _, , _ .{._}&#39;f_-&#39;;?_j.;;&#39;§;r¬i=_j.-.".;..; .=--,_92§;.;¢-.§;;;.g§§_§..j;7}.-_"l-fl.» ¢..-, _. - ., -._, _ :2. M ...., . ,. ., M. ,. ,r, _.______ . &#39;,_,_.,_,,_._u,,..,-,~.,_c..,..;_:_-.r_Jit-.&#39;-.-.-.-i-ua-Lu-.n.-|2..L.-»92.-&#39;.92;-~-r.=-.¢..1......=_4._._._.__1.- L~ i "- &#39;_. &#39;. -. .1., 3., ;. -.» ;_92.,n -~;- , &#39;. ____-;, , ~ "I 1_ _. 92 > -~___,__ &#39;.-&#39; "&#39;92:&#39;~&#39;-:- .;~___ &#39;».- -._1___>-92_p-..-..&#39; .&#39;-&#39; r-.;&#39; .a_Q*-..>. _&#39;-~ "1|&#39;1&#39;"wjria{""1&#39;-..&#39;:.&#39;>;5J&#39;-_&#39;"" .A~H.A---»" &#39;-M-----»_--...-..1&#39; _-,&#39;,". &#39;<;"::"-; .=_...- --.&#39;~..-;_..,$11-r - ,,_ % .,N,,.-..., - _ _ - _ _ __ r __. _ .. _ .,__- - _-92r --=-1 -._-»...-.;v or . 4 _ _ Va, »92 &#39;4&#39;92 _ , =92 - 92- J . &#39;- ~r92 , -.- -_ V &#39; _ __ -. .r .- ,- - ti .w=-1. <9292. Hwuac1e_m@OC. Alexancerj I _&#39; 7 ti " &#39;_n.&#39;.,4&#39; &#39;.,_.§v,.. the money tn the Republican Financial Chairman "but retained it and celled Banner as to who he shoulcl give the money ._ - ;&#39;92 hack re." __ Banner advised him that Hughes "still wanted the - Republicans to have the money and inciicetezi he had. given ,.. similar amounts to -Democratic candidates. -- _ -. ,&#39; o - :~_ .r -_ -3 _ <4: &#39; &#39;- Reborn said he had he-16 the money all this time and .r: 4;. never ecoiztributeé it. He sai he had been qnerie by Inte1:na.1.&#39; -,| Revenue people an few months ago as to the eztistence or these -A funds since they had been told by an unknown sourc5e P.ebozoo believes it was Haheu} that the money was given to Reborn, by -_ 3., Banner. In feet, Rebozo said, he thinks iiahen meyhave e . ."¢-&#39;a&#39; a13.eged"t.!m1:lDa:mer&#39; never paid the money but kept" it for his i Q-92 ovfn use, since they have become bitter eceeiea. -7 _ _ w_.J -_.-rv &#39;. Rebozo indicate that because 0,4! an this confusion .,92_;H92 , he never die give the money to the Republicans, even during &#39; the Presidential election and still, in fact, has the original . 4. .6. money in his safe deposit box. Rebozo said his p92_1J:&#39;pD_3B in &#39;: calling Hhittaker was to determine if therewas any way he, .7 ;.;,¢ &#39; Whittaker, could think o£___1_:1E_1a1;wcu1;3 indicate o_1¢_!,_t_he &#39;4 ii .-, I 4 5.}. moziey was. 1-ihittaker q=1a him he knew or no; wayjmlesa there e _&#39;.&#39;-92;§,, was some peculiarity about the xecqeyyl.-Q i_ .1-_ _; _._. _ _.»,J..,_..-.4 _:_ - _._ . _ .. _ _. _ ._&#39;__ .. _ ,__1. ... P Y e .R.,..,e=., than ma &#39;xx 1 P Reiioze, to take the money out of hisihox, recor all the numbers] an write to Banner telling him the money was available in the I vault at his bank and he wanted to return it to him eincethe ._~__;1- Preaiéent did not neeé it for his campaign-_am1 had indicated 1: to Robozo it should he returned to Hughes. &#39; -" 1 . _&#39; - - &#39; if . &#39; Mr. Hhittaker 92-raadgpresent wheethe money wae.taken out Q! 1"-he safe-deposit 1&#39;><>==. ~=.I1§&#39;-.- &#39;?=.~=-=i °b5@rv=f1&#39;_1?=. F !>e4=11.%10¢";b111=i**i&#39;~@¢i%~i: Be did not participate-in counting -the ~mney<but.did it wee all in very good-condition. 5-rhittaker advised Reborn he did not believe the FBI Laboratory could-be of any assistance in detemizaing the length of time the hills were in-At-ixe safe - deposit box. Whittaker wee asked by Rebozo if he would like -f 4. to observe the counting of the money and the marking 80 that _- Whittaker could recognize it ag&#39;ain_"_if- questioned.
Recommended publications
  • Blackmail in the Deep State
    Blackmail in the Deep State: From the Bay of Pigs and JFK Assassination to Watergate Jonathan Marshall Note: this article is excerpted from an unpublished book titled Watergate, the American Deep State, and the Legacy of Secret Government by Jonathan Marshall. The Watergate affair of 1972-74, though widely regarded as one of the the gravest political and constitutional crises in U.S. history, began not with a bang but a whimper – or as President Nixon’s press secretary dismissed it, a ‘third-rate burglary attempt’.1 Despite myriad government probes, lawsuits, news stories, and scholarly analyses, no one knows for sure what motivated the historic break-in at the Democratic National Committee headquarters during the 1972 presidential campaign.2 Another unresolved puzzle is why President Nixon, who was apparently ignorant of plans for the burglary, did not simply fire those involved and cut his losses. What cost him the presidency was not the original crime, but his illegal attempt to cover it up. I argue in the book from which this article is excerpted that the initial burglary was set in motion by White House insiders to uncover information they could use against the Democratic Party’s chairman, Larry O’Brien. A major goal was to prevent him from releasing politically damaging secrets 1 Quoted in Karlyn Barker and Walter Pincus, ‘Watergate Revisited; 20 Years After the Break-in, the Story Continues to Unfold’, Washington Post, 14 June 1992. 2 There were at least two break-ins; police arrested the burglars on 17 June 1972. Several dozen theories are noted in Edward Epstein and John Berendt, ‘Did There Come a Point in Time When There Were 43 Different Theories of How Watergate Happened?’ Esquire, November 1973.
    [Show full text]
  • A List of the Records That Petitioners Seek Is Attached to the Petition, Filed Concurrently Herewith
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN RE PETITION OF STANLEY KUTLER, ) AMERICAN HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION, ) AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR LEGAL HISTORY, ) Miscellaneous Action No. ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN HISTORIANS, ) and SOCIETY OF AMERICAN ARCHIVISTS. ) ) MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR ORDER DIRECTING RELEASE OF TRANSCRIPT OF RICHARD M. NIXON’S GRAND JURY TESTIMONY OF JUNE 23-24, 1975, AND ASSOCIATED MATERIALS OF THE WATERGATE SPECIAL PROSECUTION FORCE Professor Stanley Kutler, the American Historical Association, the American Society for Legal History, the Organization of American Historians, and the Society of American Archivists petition this Court for an order directing the release of President Richard M. Nixon’s thirty-five-year- old grand jury testimony and associated materials of the Watergate Special Prosecution Force.1 On June 23-24, 1975, President Nixon testified before two members of a federal grand jury who had traveled from Washington, DC, to San Clemente, California. The testimony was then presented in Washington, DC, to the full grand jury that had been convened to investigate political espionage, illegal campaign contributions, and other wrongdoing falling under the umbrella term Watergate. Watergate was the defining event of Richard Nixon’s presidency. In the early 1970s, as the Vietnam War raged and the civil rights movement in the United States continued its momentum, the Watergate scandal ignited a crisis of confidence in government leadership and a constitutional crisis that tested the limits of executive power and the mettle of the democratic process. “Watergate” was 1A list of the records that petitioners seek is attached to the Petition, filed concurrently herewith.
    [Show full text]
  • Nixon's Caribbean Milieu, 1950–1968
    Dark Quadrant: Organized Crime, Big Business, and the Corruption of American Democracy Online Appendix: Nixon’s Caribbean Milieu, 1950–1968 By Jonathan Marshall “Though his working life has been passed chiefly on the far shores of the continent, close by the Pacific and the Atlantic, some emotion always brings Richard Nixon back to the Caribbean waters off Key Biscayne and Florida.”—T. H. White, The Making of the President, 19681 Richard Nixon, like millions of other Americans, enjoyed Florida and the nearby islands of Cuba and the Bahamas as refuges where he could leave behind his many cares and inhibitions. But he also returned again and again to the region as an important ongoing source of political and financial support. In the process, the lax ethics of its shadier operators left its mark on his career. This Sunbelt frontier had long attracted more than its share of sleazy businessmen, promoters, and politicians who shared a get-rich-quick spirit. In Florida, hustlers made quick fortunes selling worthless land to gullible northerners and fleecing vacationers at illegal but wide-open gambling joints. Sheriffs and governors protected bookmakers and casino operators in return for campaign contributions and bribes. In nearby island nations, as described in chapter 4, dictators forged alliances with US mobsters to create havens for offshore gambling and to wield political influence in Washington. Nixon’s Caribbean milieu had roots in the mobster-infested Florida of the 1940s. He was introduced to that circle through banker and real estate investor Bebe Rebozo, lawyer Richard Danner, and Rep. George Smathers. Later this chapter will explore some of the diverse connections of this group by following the activities of Danner during the 1968 presidential campaign, as they touched on Nixon’s financial and political ties to Howard Hughes, the South Florida crime organization of Santo Trafficante, and mobbed-up hotels and casinos in Las Vegas and Miami.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Didn't Nixon Burn the Tapes and Other Questions About Watergate
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by NSU Works Nova Law Review Volume 18, Issue 3 1994 Article 7 Why Didn’t Nixon Burn the Tapes and Other Questions About Watergate Stephen E. Ambrose∗ ∗ Copyright c 1994 by the authors. Nova Law Review is produced by The Berkeley Electronic Press (bepress). https://nsuworks.nova.edu/nlr Ambrose: Why Didn't Nixon Burn the Tapes and Other Questions About Waterga Why Didn't Nixon Bum the Tapes and Other Questions About Watergate Stephen E. Ambrose* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ........................... 1775 II. WHY DID THEY BREAK IN? ........... 1776 III. WHO WAS DEEP THROAT? .......... .. 1777 IV. WHY DIDN'T NIXON BURN THE TAPES? . 1778 V. VICE PRESIDENT FORD AND THE PARDON ........ 1780 I. INTRODUCTION For almost two years, from early 1973 to September, 1974, Watergate dominated the nation's consciousness. On a daily basis it was on the front pages-usually the headline; in the news magazines-usually the cover story; on the television news-usually the lead. Washington, D.C., a town that ordinarily is obsessed by the future and dominated by predictions about what the President and Congress will do next, was obsessed by the past and dominated by questions about what Richard Nixon had done and why he had done it. Small wonder: Watergate was the political story of the century. Since 1974, Watergate has been studied and commented on by reporters, television documentary makers, historians, and others. These commentators have had an unprecedented amount of material with which to work, starting with the tapes, the documentary record of the Nixon Administration, other material in the Nixon Presidential Materials Project, plus the transcripts of the various congressional hearings, the courtroom testimony of the principal actors, and the memoirs of the participants.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix: Nixon's Caribbean Milieu, 1950–1968 “Though His Working Life Has Been Passed Chiefly on the Far Shores of the C
    Appendix: Nixon’s Caribbean Milieu, 1950–1968 “Though his working life has been passed chiefly on the far shores of the continent, close by the Pacific and the Atlantic, some emotion always brings Richard Nixon back to the Caribbean waters off Key Biscayne and Florida.”—T. H. White, The Making of the President, 19681 Richard Nixon, like millions of other Americans, enjoyed Florida and the nearby islands of Cuba and the Bahamas as refuges where he could leave behind his many cares and inhibitions. But he also returned again and again to the region as an important ongoing source of political and financial support. In the process, the lax ethics of its shadier operators left its mark on his career. This Sunbelt frontier had long attracted more than its share of sleazy businessmen, promoters, and politicians who shared a get-rich-quick spirit. In Florida, hustlers made quick fortunes selling worthless land to gullible northerners and fleecing vacationers at illegal but wide-open gambling joints. Sheriffs and governors protected bookmakers and casino operators in return for campaign contributions and bribes. In nearby island nations, as described in chapter 4, dictators forged alliances with US mobsters to create havens for offshore gambling and to wield political influence in Washington. Nixon’s Caribbean milieu had roots in the mobster-infested Florida of the 1940s. He was introduced to that circle through banker and real estate investor Bebe Rebozo, lawyer Richard Danner, and Rep. George Smathers. Later this chapter will explore some of the diverse connections of this group by following the activities of Danner during the 1968 presidential campaign, as they touched on Nixon’s financial and political ties to Howard Hughes, the South Florida crime organization of Santo Trafficante, and mobbed-up hotels and casinos in Las Vegas and Miami.
    [Show full text]
  • White House Tapes of the Nixon Administration, 1971-1973 Page | 1
    White House Tapes of the Nixon Administration, 1971-1973 Richard Nixon Presidential Library and Museum, NARA Online Public Access Catalog Identifier: 597542 Conversation No. 662-001 Conversation No. 662-002 Conversation No. 662-003 Conversation No. 662-004 Conversation No. 662-005 Conversation No. 662-006 Conversation No. 662-007 Conversation No. 662-008 Conversation No. 662-009 Conversation No. 662-010 Conversation No. 662-011 Conversation No. 662-001 Date: February 1, 1972 Time: 9:33 am - 9:35 am Location: Oval Office The President met with Alexander P. Butterfield. Missing plaque Butterfield left at an unknown time before 9:35 am. Conversation No. 662-002 Date: February 1, 1972 Time: 9:39 am - 9:45 am Location: Oval Office The President met with Alexander P. Butterfield. Missing plaque -Replacement -Certificate -University of Nebraska football team -Polls William F. (“Billy”) Graham -Timing Page | 1 White House Tapes of the Nixon Administration, 1971-1973 Richard Nixon Presidential Library and Museum, NARA Online Public Access Catalog Identifier: 597542 H. R. (“Bob”) Haldeman meeting -Timing Butterfield left at an unknown time before 9:45 am. Conversation No. 662-003 Date: February 1, 1972 Time: Unknown between 9:45 am and 10:03 am Location: Oval Office The President met with Alexander P. Butterfield. President’s schedule -William F. (“Billy”) Graham meeting -H. R. (“Bob”) Haldeman Butterfield left at an unknown time before 10:03 am. Conversation No. 662-004 Date: February 1, 1972 Time: 10:03 am - 11:37 am Location: Oval Office The President met with William F. (“Billy”) Graham and H.
    [Show full text]
  • Nixon's Wars: Secrecy, Watergate, and the CIA
    Eastern Kentucky University Encompass Online Theses and Dissertations Student Scholarship January 2016 Nixon's Wars: Secrecy, Watergate, and the CIA Chris Collins Eastern Kentucky University Follow this and additional works at: https://encompass.eku.edu/etd Part of the Defense and Security Studies Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Collins, Chris, "Nixon's Wars: Secrecy, Watergate, and the CIA" (2016). Online Theses and Dissertations. 352. https://encompass.eku.edu/etd/352 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at Encompass. It has been accepted for inclusion in Online Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Encompass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Nixon’s Wars: Secrecy, Watergate, and the CIA By Christopher M. Collins Bachelor of Arts Eastern Kentucky University Richmond, Kentucky 2011 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Eastern Kentucky University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS December, 2016 Copyright © Christopher M. Collins, 2016 All rights reserved ii Acknowledgments I could not have completed this thesis without the support and generosity of many remarkable people. First, I am grateful to the entire EKU history department for creating such a wonderful environment in which to work. It has truly been a great experience. I am thankful to the members of my advisory committee, Dr. Robert Weise, Dr. Carolyn Dupont, and especially Dr. Thomas Appleton, who has been a true friend and mentor to me, and whose kind words and confidence in my work has been a tremendous source of encouragement, without which I would not have made it this far.
    [Show full text]
  • F:\Nixon -- Move to Former Staff on 9.2\Declarations
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN RE PETITION OF STANLEY KUTLER, ) AMERICAN HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION, ) AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR LEGAL HISTORY, ) Miscellaneous Action No. ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN HISTORIANS, ) and SOCIETY OF AMERICAN ARCHIVISTS. ) ___________________________________________) DECLARATIONS IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR ORDER DIRECTING RELEASE OF TRANSCRIPT OF RICHARD M. NIXON’S GRAND JURY TESTIMONY OF JUNE 23-24, 1975, AND ASSOCIATED MATERIALS OF THE WATERGATE SPECIAL PROSECUTION FORCE Allison M. Zieve (D.C. Bar No. 424786) Michael T. Kirkpatrick (D.C. Bar No. 486293 Public Citizen Litigation Group 1600 20th Street NW Washington, DC 20009 (202) 588-1000 Counsel for Petitioners TABLE OF CONTENTS Tab Declaration of Stanley Kutler.................................................... A Declaration of Julian Helisek (including exhibits) ................................... B Declaration of Richard J. Davis .................................................. C Declaration of John W. Dean III ................................................. D Declaration of David M. Dorsen ................................................. E Declaration of Mark Feldstein ................................................... F Declaration of Don Fulsom ..................................................... G Declaration of David Greenberg ................................................. H Declaration of Kenneth J. Hughes, Jr. .............................................. I Declaration of Thomas Long ....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Murder Suspect: G. Gordon Liddy G. Gordon Liddy
    Murder Suspect: G. Gordon Liddy G. Gordon Liddy was born November 30th 1930 in Brooklyn, New York. He started as a attorney after joining the army and fighting in the Korean War. He also was the youngest Beaurea Supervisor in the F.B.I He later became a prominent figure in the Nixon administration and served many jobs and positions before heading the Committee to re-elect the president in 1972. This organization known as CREEP was used to help stop important leeks of Nixon campaign and presidential material. The CREEP leaders were closely related to the so-called “Plumbers” and were paranoid about the opposition to Nixon. Liddy, who had early been seen as somewhat of a loose cannon, did find many “democratic plots” and eagerly searched for a way to embarrass and discredit democratic candidates. The biggest scandal Liddy ever organized was the break in at the Watergate Complex. Later on, after his 5 men were caught he would be tried and incarcerated for conspiracy, burglary, and illicit wiretapping. Liddy, an unbalanced man, would be about a 6 on a scale of 1 to 10 for killing Nixon seeing as he feared serving 20 years in federal prison. Murder Suspect a) Eldridge Cleaver: Cleaver was a political activist, writer and serial rapist best known for being an early leader for the Black Panthers in the late 1960’s and early ‘70’s. After getting out of jail on a rape conviction in 1966, Cleaver became a Presidential nominee on the “Peace and Freedom” party. Cleaver was shot during the Oakland riots in 1968.
    [Show full text]
  • Allies Deserting Nixon After New Admissions Resignation Was Rumored
    The Daily Register VOL. 97 NO.34 SHREWSBURY, N. J. TUESDAY, AUGUST 6. 1974 TETEN CENTS Allies deserting Nixon after new admissions WASHINGTON (AP)\ A that threatened-to wipose the storm of protest who had been solidly in Nix- new firestorm in Congress is fact his campaign aides chan- But his promise to yield on's anti-impeachment camp threatening to engulf Richard neled money to the burglars. more tapes did little to soften were wavering toward unde- M. Nixon's presidency after — Was told six days after the harsh reaction of some of cided But one, Rep Otto K his admission he tried two the break-in that his cam- his closest allies. Passman, I) La , said he still years ago to thwart a crucial paign director and former at- Visibly shaken and fighting backed the President because phase of the FBI's Watergate torney general, John N. Mit- to keep his composure, Rep "to err is human, to forgive investigation. chell, may have had some pri- Charles E Wiggins, R Calif, divine." ' Coupled with his admission or knowledge of the wiretapp- the silver haired lawyer who House Democratic Leader that he withheld evidence ing plans. carried the burden of Nixon's Thomas P "Tip" O'Neill of from Congress, the public and — Withheld evidence from defense in the Judiciary Com- Massachusetts said, "A tidal his own lawyer, the disclosure his closest advisers and law- mittee, told newsmen: wave is about to strike the dealt a devastating blow to yers as well as (he House "After considerable reflec- House as far as impeachment Nixon's already dimmed Judiciary Committee, and tion, I have reached the pain- goes.
    [Show full text]
  • Tequesta: the Journal of Historymiami Museum
    The Journal of HistoryMiami Museum LXXVIII (78) 2018 The Journal of HistoryMiami Museum Number LXXVIII (78) 2018 Cover—Fowey Rocks Light, within Biscayne National Park. Kirsten Hines, photographer. © Kirsten Hines, http://www.KirstenNatureTravel.com. 3 Tequesta The Journal of HistoryMiami Museum Editor Paul S. George, Ph.D. Managing Editor Rebecca A. Smith Number LXXVIII (78) 2018 Contents Trustees.................................................................................4 Editor’s Foreword .................................................................5 A History of Southern Biscayne Bay and its National Park J a es . u s la a d i s e i es ..................................8 Wrecking Rules: Florida’s First Territorial Scrum J a es il h m a .................................................................58 El Jardin: the Story behind Miami’s Modern Mediterranean Masterpiece I r is u z m a ola a.........................................................106 Stars and Tropical Splendor: The Movie Palaces of Greater Miami, 1926-1976 R o e t o is e es .......................................................... 132 Memberships and Donations ........................................... 174 About T e u es a ..................................................................175 © Copyright 2018 by the Historical Association of Southern Florida 4 Tequesta LXXVIII HistoryMiami Museum Historical Association of Southern Florida, Inc. Founded 1940—Incorporated 1941 Trustees Michael Weiser, Chairman John Shubin, Vice Chairman Etan Mark,
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the DISTRICT of COLUMBIA in RE PETITION of ) ) STANLEY KUTLER ) 4112 Keewatin Trail ) Verona, W
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN RE PETITION OF ) ) STANLEY KUTLER ) 4112 Keewatin Trail ) Verona, Wisconsin 53593; ) ) AMERICAN HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION ) 400 A Street SE ) Washington, District of Columbia 20003; ) ) AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR LEGAL HISTORY ) Miscellaneous Action No. 4301 Friedmann Hall ) Western Michigan University ) Kalamazoo, Michigan 49008; ) ) ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN HISTORIANS ) 112 North Bryan Avenue ) Bloomington, Indiana 47408; ) ) and ) ) SOCIETY OF AMERICAN ARCHIVISTS ) 17 North State Street, Suite 1425 ) Chicago, Illinois 60602. ) __________________________________________) PETITION FOR ORDER DIRECTING RELEASE OF TRANSCRIPT OF RICHARD M. NIXON’S GRAND JURY TESTIMONY OF JUNE 23-24, 1975, AND ASSOCIATED MATERIALS OF THE WATERGATE SPECIAL PROSECUTION FORCE Stanley Kutler, the American Historical Association, American Society for Legal History, Organization of American Historians, and Society of American Archivists hereby petition this Court to exercise its inherent supervisory authority to unseal the transcript of President Richard M. Nixon’s grand jury testimony of June 23-24, 1975, and certain associated materials of the Watergate Special Prosecution Force. Attached to this petition is a list of the records that petitioners seek. The records are located at the National Archives and Records Administration in College Park, Maryland, as part of Record Group 460, Records of the Watergate Special Prosecution Force, Special Prosecutor’s Files, Records Relating to Richard Nixon. 1. Stanley Kutler is an historian, Professor Emeritus at the University of Wisconsin, and author of The Wars of Watergate (1990), a text that is widely considered to be the definitive account of the Watergate scandal. The American Historical Association, American Society for Legal History, and Organization of American Historians are professional organizations for historians.
    [Show full text]