DOCSLIB.ORG

· .. ·. ·Newsletter

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

·Australian~··· ·Systematic • ... ··Botany ·.···.·Society. ' ·.. ·. ·Newsletter. ·:- ., ' . .·No. 91 JUNE· 1997- . Price.: $5..00 . Registered by Australia Post Print Post Publication Number. PP 545545 - 0055 · · _ISSI';Jl034-1218 '· AUST-~LIAN. SYSTEMATIC BOTANY SOCIETY iNCORPORATED Qffice Bearers Pr.esident · Vice President Dr T. J. Entwisle . Dr C. J, Puttock · National Herbarium ofVicto~ia, · Australian National Herbarium; -Birdwood Avenue, . _0PO Box 1600, South Yarra, Vic. 3141 . Can~erra,ACT 2601 tel.: (03) 925.2231.3 - tel.: (06) 2465497 ·fmc (03) 92522350 fax: (06) 2465249 e'mail: [email protected] email: [email protected] ·Secretary · Treasurer . Mrs R. M. Barker · Mr J. (:larkson- Botanic Garden of Adelaide · Queensland Herbarium, iuid State Herbarium; PO Box 1054, .. North Terrace, . Mareeba, Q1d 4~80 Ade1aid~, SA 5000 · ·tej.: (070) 928445 . tel.:_ (08) 2282303 fax: (070) 923593 fax: (08) 2231809 · email:[email protected]:au · _ · email:[email protected],au . Councillor · - :Councillor Dr T. Macfarlane · Dr P. Weston Western Australian Herbarium, Natioiial Herbarium ofNew South Wales,' Dept Conservation & Land Management; Mrs Macq1,umes Road; Manjimup, WA 6258 · Sydney, NSW 2000 ·. e~1ail: terrym@calm:wagov.au ·- <bmail; [email protected]()v.. au. Affil_iate SocietY Pajma New q-uinea Botanical Society .. Australian Botanicafqaison Officer · P~blic Officer ~nd Melllbership Officer . Dr D. B. Foreman MrA.Lyne Herbarium, · Al!siralian N atiorial Herbarium; Royal Botanic Gardens,-'Kew, Centre for Plant Biodiversity Research - RichmoP,d; Surrey TW9 3AB, GPO Box 1600; -England· Canberra, ACT 2601 teJ.: 44-1S1c3325270 tel.:.(06) Q465508 faX:44-181-3325278 fax: (06) 2465249 .• · ein~l: [email protected] email: [email protected] . - ASBS Web site: http:/11-~5.187.10.1:~/asbs/asbs.html · Australian Systematic Botany Society Newsletter 91 (June 1997) Funding for systematics and our institution, and why we study one With continuing cuts to Environment Australia's plant group and not another. Lobbying and budget, and in particular to the Australian spruiking certainly take time away from our Biological Resources Study, it is a sobering core business, but it is our responsibility to time for Australia systematists. Will any of the convince the widest possible audience of money from the sale ofTelstra go to research? the value of our science. If systematics At this stage it seems unlikely we will get more continues to decline it is not solely the fault than a few crumbs. I wrote recently on behalf of of government or voters, systematists must ASBS to Senator Hill, registering our concerns share the blame. about cuts toABRS. Such letters are necessary and sometimes lead to change, but they are not Newsletter enough. I recently sent out an urgent call to all chapter conveners and councillors, seeking a new editor It is equally important that we lobby on behalf (or brood of editors). The Darwin team, now of systematics in our own institutions, whether ably led by Philip Short, have announced that they be universities or herbaria/botanic gardens. after the December issue they want out. There Is it enough to say that you study a particular has been one nibble from the opposite genus because it is poorly known, or because extremity of Australia, but if there is an you suspect there are half a dozen undescribed enthusiastic editor somewhere in between, the species? There are hundreds of vascular plant job is theirs. genera like that. Why are you working on a particular genus? Is it because the genus has As newsletter editor you keep in regular contact important implications in biodiversity withASBS members from all over the place. You conservation? Will your research lead to keep up with what is happening in ASBS, plant sustainable use of natural resources? Will your systematics and (through the FASTS bulletins) studies provide fundamental advances in our Australian science. Even better, you get to knowledge of evolution and the origins of life inflict your wit and wisdom on a witty and wise on earth? I'm sure other reasons spring to audience. If you have any aspirations towards mind ... science journalism, or just plain enjoy writing or editing, give it a try. We have a duty to sell systematics to the government, to the general public and to our While waxing on this subject, I should also colleagues. Talks and seminars must be exciting lobby for contributions to the newsletter. and persuasive. Our research results must be Apparently everyone in the society agreed explained and interpreted in ways that everyone with Chris Quinn's recent letter. No one has can understand. It is quite reasonable to be concerns about cuts to the ABRS budget. asked why systematics is important, why it Nothing interesting, touching or funny happens should be supported by government funds in plant systematics in Australia. And was Australian Systematic Botany Society Newsletter 91 (June 1997) there really an ASBS conference in Melbourne International Botanical Congress, to be held in last year? StLouis, USA, in August 1999. In particular, the organisers have called for topics for symposia. A Hansjorg Eichler Scientific Research Fund HISCOM-based session has already been With too little fanfare, the application forms for suggested. If you are interested in finding out the inaugural Eichler Fund grants were included more about the Congress or in contributing to in the last newsletter. Applications were due in the program for the Congress, look at the by 12 June and the successful candidates will website http://www.ibc99.org. be announced at the Adelaide conference. The full Council will act as selection panel (except You might also consider whereASBS might on applications where there may be a conflict of meet in 1999, and how or if that meeting should interest). We propose to favour honours and relate to the IBC. There are a few options. The post-graduate students, or newly established Society of Australian Systematic Biologists botanists, to keep with the spirit of the (SASB, rather than the unfortunate acronym proposals discussed at various council meetings ASS I inadvertently chose last time) is at present over the years. Inevitably we will learn from this organising its future conference program and we first selection process. The lack of background could plan another meeting with them (but information in the newsletter is certainly one where?). Bob Hill has floated the idea of a pair aspect which will be have to be improved next of symposia focusing on systematics to be time. jointly hosted by the Korean Botanical Society and ASBS. The proposal involves a meeting in It is opportune to thank again Marlies Eichler South Korea next year, with a follow-up in for her establishment of, and substantial Australia in 1999. This may have an impact on contributions to, this fund. If anyone would like any meeting of ASBS associated with Monocots to join Marlies in fostering the research of II in Sydney next year. young and new systematic botanists, please send donations to the Treasurer. Tax Historical proposals abound. We could deductibility for the fund is currently under commemorate Dampier's landing in Western investigation. Australia with a conference in Perth (or maybe Dirk Hartog Island to tie in even more history) National Biodiversity Council in 1999. Reenactments of the Flinders voyage I neglected to mention in the last newsletter that are proposed for the year 2002, and ASBS Peter Weston is another ASBS member in the clearly has a role in these. It has been noted that NBC assembly. He was chosen as an Australian cities in need of an ASBS conference independent member. Although he does not include Alice Springs, Darwin, Armidale and represent the society, I am sure he will happily Townsville. Plenty to think about before the relay the concerns of society members. Our ASBS meeting in Adelaide. If you have ideas or society representatives are Bob Hill and Darren suggestions contact your chapter convener or an Crayn. ASBS councillor. Conferences Tim Entwisle ASBS has been invited to participate in the next Australian Systematic Botany Society Newsletter 91 (June 1997) 1\.SBS 1110 Bl:JSINESS - PAROORIVER Participating speakers include Professor Brian Timms (Geography, Newcastle University), Dr In my capacity as secretary of the Society, an John Pickard (Environmental Planning, Mac­ invitation has just (4th June) been received from quarie University), Dr Bill Young (CSIRO Land the Paroo River Association to attend a Scien­ & Water, Canberra), Dr Martin Thoms (CRC for tific Workshop to be held in Hungerford, Freshwater Ecology, Canberra University), Dr Queensland, from 7th-9th July 1997. Its text Sue Briggs (NSWNPWS), Mr JimPuckeridge reads as follows. (Zoology, Adelaide University), Dr Stuart Bunn (Catchment and In-Stream Research, Griffith "The workshop is a result of concerns raised by University), Dr Margaret Brock Botany, Univer­ the Paroo River Association over water manage­ sity of New England), Dr Michelle Casanova ment of the Paroo River. It is our understanding (Botany, University ofNew England), Dr Jane that there are currently 2 applications for Roberts (CSIRO Land & Water, Canberra), Dr commercial irrigation submitted for considera­ Andrew Boulton (Zoology, University of New tion by the Department of Water Resources in England), Dr Richard Kingsford (NSWNPWS), Queensland. The extraction of substantial of Dr Peter Fairweather (CSIRO Land & Water, water from the Paroo would have disastrous Griffith)and Mr Mark Morrison (Economics & consequences for all downstream and the fragile Management, University ofNSW). ecology of the river. The Paroo River remains the only river in the Murray-Darling Basin Unfortunately I will be unable to attend and by untouched by such water management. the time this newsletter is distributed the We hope the workshop will provide the local workshop will be over. community with information which will guide As a footnote, members might be interested in decision-making processes within government Siobhan McHugh's book 'Cottoning On', which aim to manage river systems.
Recommended publications
  • Wildflowers to Grow in Your Garden Here Is the Key to the List Large

    Wildflowers to Grow in Your Garden Here Is the Key to the List Large

    Wildflowers to grow in your garden Here is the key to the list Trees Ground covers Shrubs Eucalypts Banksias Myrtle family Banksias Others Baeckea Other Beaufortia Calothamnus Chamelaucium Hypocalymna Kunzea Melaleuca and Callistemon Scholtzia Thryptomene Verticordia Large trees. Think very carefully before you plant them! Large trees, such as lemon scented gums or spotted gums may look great in parks - at least local councils seem to think so (we would rather see local plants). But you may regret planting them in a modern small garden. That doesn't mean there is no room for trees. There are hundreds of attractive small trees that grow very well in native gardens. Here are just a few. Small trees Eucalypts with showy flowers. Eucalytpus caesia Comes in two sub species with the one known as "silver princess" being readily available in Perth. Lovely multi- stemmed weeping tree with pendulous pink flowers and silver-bell fruits. E. torquata Small upright tree with attractive pink flowers. Very drought resistant. E. ficifolia Often called the WA Flowering gum. Ranges in size from small to quite large and in flower colour from deep red to = Corymbia ficifolia orange to pale pink. In WA subject to a serious disease - called canker. Many trees succumb when about 10 or so years old, either dying or becoming very unhealthy. E. preissiana Bell fruited mallee. Small tree (or shrub) with bright yellow flowers. E. erythrocorys Illyarrie, red cap gum or helmet nut gum. Large golden flowers in February preceded by a bright red bud cap. Tree tends to be bit floppy and to need pruning.
  • Salinity Tolerance of Muntries (Kunzea Pomifera F. Muell.)

    Salinity Tolerance of Muntries (Kunzea Pomifera F. Muell.)

    HORTSCIENCE 53(11):1562–1569. 2018. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI13280-18 When crops are subjected to soil salinity levels exceeding their tolerance levels, plant Kunzea growth declines and crop yields decrease. For Salinity Tolerance of Muntries ( example, strawberry (sensitive) exhibits a re- pomifera duced number of leaves and leaf area at F. Muell.), a Native Food Crop 30 mM NaCl and a 20% reduction in fruit yield (Garriga et al., 2015). A significant in Australia decrease in growth of date palm (tolerant) –1 is observed at 7.3 dS·m , and fruit yield is Chi M. Do, Kate L. Delaporte, Vinay Pagay, and Carolyn J. Schultz1 reduced by 25% (Department of Agricul- School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, Waite Research Institute, The ture and Food, 2016). Olive is an example of University of Adelaide, PMB1, Glen Osmond, SA, 5064, Australia a moderately tolerant fruit crop that shows relatively minor impacts at high salinity (7.5 Additional index words. alternative fruits, homeostasis, potassium, salinity stress, sodium dS·m–1), with 20% to 30% reduction in oil chloride, sustainable agriculture and fresh-fruit yield compared with nonsalt- stressed plants (Al-Rawi and Al-Mohemdy, Abstract . Identifying productive food crops that tolerate moderate soil salinity is critical 2001). In citrus (lime and lemon, both sensi- Kunzea pomifera for global food security. We evaluate the salinity tolerance of tive crops), moderate salinity (50 mM NaCl) (muntries), a traditional Indigenous food plant that grows naturally in coastal regions reduces leaf number, area, and thickness of southern Australia and thrives on relatively low rainfall.
  • Epacris Study Group

    Epacris Study Group

    AUSTRALIAN NATIVE PLANTS SOCIETY (Australia) Jnc. EPACRIS STUDY GROUP Group Leader: Gwen Elliot, P.O.Box 655 Heathmont Vic. 3135 NEWSLETTER NO. 30 (ISSN 1038-6017) Greetings to all Epacris Study Group members, Regular readers of our Newsletters will have noticed the following note which was added to page 1 of our Autumn 2010 issue, just prior to it going to press. NOTE: I have just received in the post an envelope addressed to the Epacris Study Group, posted from Hobart on May Znd, 2010. Unfortunately the envelope was slit along the bottom and was totally empty. There was no information regarding the sender, but ifyou have sent such a letter in recent days, please let me know, and perhaps cancel any cheque sent. Fortunately all turned out well in the end, as the next morning an Epacris Study Group renewal form was delivered with a $5 note stapled to the corner. Our very nice Post Office manager advised that it had been found on the floor of the district sorting office. He went on to explain that many of today's envelopes have a very effective self-sealing strip and if there is any air left in the envelope when the seal is fastened envelopes can 'pop' at the bottom as they go through the rollers of the sorting machines. This is certainly something I had not personally considered previously, but I felt it is very useful information for us all to be aware of. All of my letters will be squashed down firmly in future to avoid this potential problem.
  • Puccinia Psidii Winter MAY10 Tasmania (C)

    Puccinia Psidii Winter MAY10 Tasmania (C)

    MAY10Pathogen of the month – May 2010 a b c Fig. 1. Puccinia psidii; (a) Symptoms on Eucalyptus grandis seedling; (b) Stem distortion and multiple branching caused by repeated infections of E. grandis, (c) Syzygium jambos; (d) Psidium guajava; (e) Urediniospores. Photos: A. Alfenas, Federal University of Viçosa, Brazil (a, b,d and e) and M. Glen, University of Tasmania (c). Common Name: Guava rust, Eucalyptus rust d e Winter Disease: Rust in a wide range of Myrtaceous species Classification: K: Fungi, D: Basidiomycota, C: Pucciniomycetes, O: Pucciniales, F: Pucciniaceae Puccinia psidii (Fig. 1) is native to South America and is not present in Australia. It causes rust on a wide range of plant species in the family Myrtaceae. First described on guava, P. psidii became a significant problem in eucalypt plantations in Brazil and also requires control in guava orchards. A new strain of the rust severely affected the allspice industry in Jamaica in the 1930s. P. psidii has spread to Florida, California and Hawaii. In 2007, P. psidii arrived in Japan, on Metrosideros polymorpha cuttings imported from Hawaii. Host Range: epiphytotics on Syzygium jambos in Hawaii, with P. psidii infects young leaves, shoots and fruits of repeated defoliations able to kill 12m tall trees. many species of Myrtaceae. Key Distinguishing Features: Impact: Few rusts are recorded on Myrtaceae. These include In the wild, in its native range, P. psidii has only a P. cygnorum, a telial rust on Kunzea ericifolia, and minor effect. As eucalypt plantations in Brazil are Physopella xanthostemonis on Xanthostemon spp. in largely clonal, impact in areas with a suitable climate Australia.
  • Budawangia* an E-Newsletter for All Those Interested in the Native Plants of the Nsw South Coast

    Budawangia* an E-Newsletter for All Those Interested in the Native Plants of the Nsw South Coast

    BUDAWANGIA* AN E-NEWSLETTER FOR ALL THOSE INTERESTED IN THE NATIVE PLANTS OF THE NSW SOUTH COAST Contact: Dr Kevin Mills – [email protected] No. 48 - March 2016 Aims: To connect those interested in the native flora of the NSW South Coast, to share up to date information on the flora of the region and to broaden the appreciation of the region’s native plants. Editorial With continuing warmer oceans around Australia, El Nino has deepened during the last two months, and our dry conditions continued into mid-March when some reasonable rain finally came. We can only be thankful that the severe bushfires this season in other states have not occurred in our part of the world. Blackberry bushes were introduced for their fruit but now are regarded as noxious weeds. Many of us would remember going out in summer and collecting the fruit from thickets of Blackberry in paddocks and escarpment clearings. Native raspberries are closely related to the Blackberry, and there are four species in the region, although their fruits are not as an attractive culinary treat as the introduction. The native raspberries are the subject of the first piece in this newsletter, followed by items on a plant of the month, an eatable thistle, slime mould and a new weed for the region. The answers to last month’s challenge to identify rainforest tree bark are also provided as is a photo of a common local frog from a reader. Below is another note on a common Australian genus. Grevillea - named in 1809 after the English politician and founder of the London Horticultural Society Charles Francis Greville.
  • Comparative Floral Presentation and Bee-Pollination in Two Sprengelia Species (Ericaceae)

    Comparative Floral Presentation and Bee-Pollination in Two Sprengelia Species (Ericaceae)

    Comparative floral presentation and bee-pollination in two Sprengelia species (Ericaceae) Karen A. Johnson* and Peter B. McQuillan School of Geography and Environmental Studies, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 78, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia. *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Pollination by sonication is unusual in the Styphelioideae, family Ericaceae. Sprengelia incarnata and Sprengelia propinqua have floral characteristics that suggested they might be adapted to buzz pollination.Both species have florally similar nectarless flowers except that the stamens ofSprengelia propinqua spread widely after the flower opens, while those of Sprengelia incarnata cohere in the centre of the flower. To test whether sonication occurs, we observed bee behaviour at the flowers of both plant species, documented potential pollinators, and examined their floral and pollen attributes. We found that Sprengelia incarnata had smaller and drier pollen than Sprengelia propinqua. We found that Sprengelia incarnata was sonicated by native bees in the families Apidae (Exoneura), Halictidae (Lasioglossum) and Colletidae (Leioproctus, Euryglossa). Sprengelia propinqua was also visited by bees from the Apidae (Exoneura) and Halictidae (Lasioglossum), but pollen was collected by scraping. The introduced Apis mellifera (Apidae) foraged at Sprengelia propinqua but ignored Sprengelia incarnata. The two Sprengelia species shared some genera of potential pollinators, but appeared to have diverged enough in their floral and pollen characters to elicit different behaviours from the native and introduced bees. Cunninghamia (2011) 12 (1): 45–51 Introduction species, some Leucopogon species, Richea milliganii (Hook.f.) F.Muell., and Sprengelia incarnata Sm. (Houston The interactions between plants and pollinators are thought & Ladd, 2002; Ladd, 2006).
  • Creating Jobs, Protecting Forests?

    Creating Jobs, Protecting Forests?

    Creating Jobs, Protecting Forests? An Analysis of the State of the Nation’s Regional Forest Agreements Creating Jobs, Protecting Forests? An Analysis of the State of the Nation’s Regional Forest Agreements The Wilderness Society. 2020, Creating Jobs, Protecting Forests? The State of the Nation’s RFAs, The Wilderness Society, Melbourne, Australia Table of contents 4 Executive summary Printed on 100% recycled post-consumer waste paper 5 Key findings 6 Recommendations Copyright The Wilderness Society Ltd 7 List of abbreviations All material presented in this publication is protected by copyright. 8 Introduction First published September 2020. 9 1. Background and legal status 12 2. Success of the RFAs in achieving key outcomes Contact: [email protected] | 1800 030 641 | www.wilderness.org.au 12 2.1 Comprehensive, Adequate, Representative Reserve system 13 2.1.1 Design of the CAR Reserve System Cover image: Yarra Ranges, Victoria | mitchgreenphotos.com 14 2.1.2 Implementation of the CAR Reserve System 15 2.1.3 Management of the CAR Reserve System 16 2.2 Ecologically Sustainable Forest Management 16 2.2.1 Maintaining biodiversity 20 2.2.2 Contributing factors to biodiversity decline 21 2.3 Security for industry 22 2.3.1 Volume of logs harvested 25 2.3.2 Employment 25 2.3.3 Growth in the plantation sector of Australia’s wood products industry 27 2.3.4 Factors contributing to industry decline 28 2.4 Regard to relevant research and projects 28 2.5 Reviews 32 3. Ability of the RFAs to meet intended outcomes into the future 32 3.1 Climate change 32 3.1.1 The role of forests in climate change mitigation 32 3.1.2 Climate change impacts on conservation and native forestry 33 3.2 Biodiversity loss/resource decline 33 3.2.1 Altered fire regimes 34 3.2.2 Disease 35 3.2.3 Pest species 35 3.3 Competing forest uses and values 35 3.3.1 Water 35 3.3.2 Carbon credits 36 3.4 Changing industries, markets and societies 36 3.5 International and national agreements 37 3.6 Legal concerns 37 3.7 Findings 38 4.
  • Native Plants Sixth Edition Sixth Edition AUSTRALIAN Native Plants Cultivation, Use in Landscaping and Propagation

    Native Plants Sixth Edition Sixth Edition AUSTRALIAN Native Plants Cultivation, Use in Landscaping and Propagation

    AUSTRALIAN NATIVE PLANTS SIXTH EDITION SIXTH EDITION AUSTRALIAN NATIVE PLANTS Cultivation, Use in Landscaping and Propagation John W. Wrigley Murray Fagg Sixth Edition published in Australia in 2013 by ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Reed New Holland an imprint of New Holland Publishers (Australia) Pty Ltd Sydney • Auckland • London • Cape Town Many people have helped us since 1977 when we began writing the first edition of Garfield House 86–88 Edgware Road London W2 2EA United Kingdom Australian Native Plants. Some of these folk have regrettably passed on, others have moved 1/66 Gibbes Street Chatswood NSW 2067 Australia to different areas. We endeavour here to acknowledge their assistance, without which the 218 Lake Road Northcote Auckland New Zealand Wembley Square First Floor Solan Road Gardens Cape Town 8001 South Africa various editions of this book would not have been as useful to so many gardeners and lovers of Australian plants. www.newhollandpublishers.com To the following people, our sincere thanks: Steve Adams, Ralph Bailey, Natalie Barnett, www.newholland.com.au Tony Bean, Lloyd Bird, John Birks, Mr and Mrs Blacklock, Don Blaxell, Jim Bourner, John Copyright © 2013 in text: John Wrigley Briggs, Colin Broadfoot, Dot Brown, the late George Brown, Ray Brown, Leslie Conway, Copyright © 2013 in map: Ian Faulkner Copyright © 2013 in photographs and illustrations: Murray Fagg Russell and Sharon Costin, Kirsten Cowley, Lyn Craven (Petraeomyrtus punicea photograph) Copyright © 2013 New Holland Publishers (Australia) Pty Ltd Richard Cummings, Bert
  • Budawangia and Rupicola, New and Revised Genera of Epacridaceae.Crossref

    Budawangia and Rupicola, New and Revised Genera of Epacridaceae.Crossref

    Volume 5(1): 229–239 TELOPEA Publication Date: 30 September 1992 Til. Ro)'al BOTANIC GARDENS dx.doi.org/10.7751/telopea19924966 Journal of Plant Systematics 6 DOPII(liPi Tm st plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au/Telopea • escholarship.usyd.edu.au/journals/index.php/TEL· ISSN 0312-9764 (Print) • ISSN 2200-4025 (Online) 229 Budawangia and Rupico/a, new and revised genera of Epacridaceae Ian R. H. Telford Abstract Telford, I.R.H. (Australian National Botanic Gardens, Canberra, ACT, Australia 2601) 1992. Rupicola and Budawangia, new and revised genera of Epacridaceae. Telopea 5(1): 229-239. Rupicola Maiden & Betche consists of four species endemic in New South Wales. Besides the type species, R. sprengelioides Maiden & Betche, R. ciliata Telford and R. decumbens Telford are described as new and a new combination is made for R. apiculata (Cunn.) Telford, which is transferred from Epacris. R. gnidioides Summerh. is transferred from Rupicola to the monotypic new genus Budawangia Telford as B. gnidioides (Summerh.) Telford. Introduction Rupicola Maiden & Betche (1898) was established as monotypic with its only species, R. sprengelioides, endemic to New South Wales in the southern Blue Mountains. A second species, R. gnidioides Summerh., was described from the Southern Tablelands escarpment SW of Nowra, N.S.W., in 1927. This species has been shown to be mis­ placed and is here transferred from Rupicola to a new monotypic genus. More recent discoveries have yielded two new species of Rupicola described in this paper. Studies in staminal morphology have shown that a species previously included in Epacris must also be transferred to Rupicola.
  • Pollination Ecology and Evolution of Epacrids

    Pollination Ecology and Evolution of Epacrids

    Pollination Ecology and Evolution of Epacrids by Karen A. Johnson BSc (Hons) Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Tasmania February 2012 ii Declaration of originality This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma by the University or any other institution, except by way of background information and duly acknowledged in the thesis, and to the best of my knowledge and belief no material previously published or written by another person except where due acknowledgement is made in the text of the thesis, nor does the thesis contain any material that infringes copyright. Karen A. Johnson Statement of authority of access This thesis may be made available for copying. Copying of any part of this thesis is prohibited for two years from the date this statement was signed; after that time limited copying is permitted in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. Karen A. Johnson iii iv Abstract Relationships between plants and their pollinators are thought to have played a major role in the morphological diversification of angiosperms. The epacrids (subfamily Styphelioideae) comprise more than 550 species of woody plants ranging from small prostrate shrubs to temperate rainforest emergents. Their range extends from SE Asia through Oceania to Tierra del Fuego with their highest diversity in Australia. The overall aim of the thesis is to determine the relationships between epacrid floral features and potential pollinators, and assess the evolutionary status of any pollination syndromes. The main hypotheses were that flower characteristics relate to pollinators in predictable ways; and that there is convergent evolution in the development of pollination syndromes.
  • Gloucester Park, Margaret

    Gloucester Park, Margaret

    Flora and Fauna Assessment Gloucester Park, Margaret River Prepared November 2016 for the Shire of Augusta Margaret River Flora and Fauna Assessment Gloucester Park, Margaret River, November 2016 This document has been prepared by Litoria Ecoservices for the express use of the client. Litoria Ecoservices accepts no responsibility to any third party who may rely upon this document. All rights reserved. No section or element of this document may be removed from this document, reproduced, electronically stored or transmitted in any form without the written permission of Litoria Ecoservices. Version Control Version Date Version Purpose Author Draft 1 29/11/ 2016 Draft for client review DMcK Final 1 5/12/2016 Complete Report D McK Flora and Fauna Assessment Gloucester Park, Margaret River, November 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 2 1.1 Background .......................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Site Description .................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Assessment Objectives and Scope ....................................................................... 2 1.5 Personnel .............................................................................................................. 3 1.6 Landform .............................................................................................................
  • Southern Gulf, Queensland

    Southern Gulf, Queensland

    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.