DOCSLIB.ORG

Spring 2018 Issue

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

SCIENCE IN PARLIAMENT 8 1 0 2 G N I The Journal of the R Parliamentary and P Scientific Committee sip S Opening in 2018, the Quadr am I nstitut e will f ocus on the impac t of diet and micr ob es on health y ageing , br ing ing clinicians alongside This is not an official publication of the House of scien tists under one r oof , maximising Commons or the House of Lords. It has not been approved the unique w or ld- class bioscienc e by either House or its Committees. All-Party Groups are informal groups of clust er a t the Nor wich members of both Houses with a common Resear ch P ar k. interest in particular issues. The views expressed in this Journal are those of the Group. This Journal is funded by the members of the Parliamentary and Scientific Committee. www.scienceinparliament.org.uk quadr am.ac .uk At t he f orefro nt of en er gy transfor mation £6 0m Ove r In novat e U K in ve stment 40 industrial pa rtners £120 m industrial co -inv estment More t ha n 1,000 7 re searc hers pa rtners Find o ut m ore a t: era .ac.uk Or g et i n t ouch: enqui ries@e ra.a c.uk included in this edition. We also STEM for BRITAIN. Details of the include a summary of the winners can be found on the SCIENCE IN PARLIAMENT meeting we held jointly with the website APPG on Food and Drink www.stemforbritain.org.uk and Manufacturing where we we will be publishing a special discussed the Science of Food STEM for BRITAIN edition of Manufacturing. Science in Parliament in the sip Summer. As the Government Envoy to the Year of Engineering – the I hope you will enjoy the The Journal of the Parliamentary and campaign that will see plethora of other topics Scientific Committee. Stephen Metcalfe MP, government join forces with presented in this issue from the The Parliamentary and Scientific Chairman, Parliamentary and industry to give thousands of up and coming science Committee is an All-Party Scientific Committee Parliamentary Group of members of young people direct and inspiring surrounding microbiomes both both Houses of Parliament and British experiences of engineering within and around us to how members of the European Parliament, representatives of scientific and Welcome to the Spring edition of throughout 2018 – I have been science and engineering can technical institutions, industrial Science in Parliament . As ever it busy around the country visiting help us with the real challenge of organisations and universities. has been a busy start to the year projects. You can discover more achieving the ambitious CO 2 for both myself and the about the Year of Engineering in reduction targets set by Government of 50% compared Parliamentary and Scientific this edition and find out more with 1990s levels by 2030, and Committee. Our opening about how you can get involved an 80% reduction by 2050. meeting on ‘Data as a resource ’ in this celebration of Engineering. drew a capacity audience I was pleased to see many fascinated in the potential of data fascinating engineering projects Science in Parliament has two main but also concerned about some alongside those from the objectives: of the ethical issues presented. biosciences, physical sciences 1. to inform the scientific and Many of the issues presented by and mathematics at the finals of industrial communities of activities within Parliament of a scientific our excellent speakers are our Annual Poster Competition nature and of the progress of relevant legislation; 2. to keep Members of Parliament abreast of scientific affairs. CONTENTS FOREWORD 1 DATA IN REAL-LIFE CANCER THERAPY 12 RADIOTHERAPY - CANCER TREATMENT OF THE Stephen Metcalfe MP Bissan Al-Lazakani FUTURE 22 SCIENCE AND FOOD MANUFACTURING 2 DATA AS A RESOURCE: FOR WHAT? AND FOR Alexandra Stewart, Andy Beavis Helen Munday, John Bows, Tim Foster, Ian Noble WHO? 15 UPDATE FROM HOC LIBRARY 25 Simon Burall IT IS TIME FOR A NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR Edward Potton ENERGY INNOVATION 4 UNLOCKING THE MICROBIOME 16 Gordon Waddington Paul Richards, Roya Ziaie NEWS FROM POST 25 Jonathan Wentworth ENERGY EFFICIENT MOTORS ON AN INDUSTRIAL A YEAR TO INSPIRE THE ENGINEERS OF SCALE 7 TOMORROW 18 SELECT COMMITTEES UPDATE 26 Christopher Donaghy-Spargo Jo Parry SCIENCE DIRECTORY 31 MAKING DATA WORK 10 VOICE OF THE FUTURE 2018 20 Mandy Chessell SCIENCE DIARY 40 Science in Parliament | Vol 74 No 1 | Spring 2018 1 SCIENCE AND FOOD MANUFACTURING The food and drink manufacturing industry is the biggest sector will create benefits for us all. Fail to do so and we risk manufacturing sector in the country – bigger than the losing it to overseas automotive and aerospace industries combined. The food supply competitors. chain employs almost 4 million people and generates £112bn of In 2015 Roger Eccleston value to the UK economy each year. The food and drink (Sheffield Hallam University) manufacturing sector contributes £28.8bn to the economy. and I approached the Institute of Physics because we saw a Then, how does the food and drink sector continue to deliver the need for physics within food manufacturing to grow. We wide variety of safe, affordable food to consumers? With Brexit identified an opportunity for making exports so key – how can we build on food and drink’s physics to enable growth within the sector by using physics- £20 billion in global exports? based research to solve its pre- competitive challenges, and The answers to these and efficiency. It was illustrated that his capacity of Chair of the also spotted a chance for the many other questions are of maintaining the sector at the Institute of Physics (IOP) Physics industry to play a central role in course through science and forefront of technology is vital, in Food Manufacturing Group. solving some genuine innovation to deliver productivity and underpins the success of He reflected on his own fundamental physics problems. and growth . During the UK’s largest manufacturing personal views expressed as Taking on the challenge, the December’s meeting of the sector. follows (which do not IOP created a pilot programme Parliamentary and Scientific necessarily reflect the position or First to present was Helen of open innovation in food Committee and the All Party policy of PepsiCo Inc.) Munday, Chief Scientific Officer manufacturing, culminating in Parliamentary Group (APPG) for “Working in the food at the Food and Drink the IOP publishing the ‘Health Food and Drink Manufacturing, manufacturing sector, I know Federation, who set the scene, of Physics in Food attendees were enlightened by how important physics is. Much including giving details on the Manufacturing’ report in 2016. speakers from the food and drink dimensions of the sector. This of the technology used, and sector on a breadth of topics that included the fact that the sector many of the innovations that The food sector faces global demonstrated how technologically contains many small and make the sector competitive, challenges including population advanced the industry is. medium enterprises (SMEs), in are underpinned by physics. It’s growth, globalisation, food security, minimising Introduced by Chairmen fact 96% of businesses fall into central to improvements in environmental impact, and Stephen Metcalfe MP (for the this category. Therefore, products themselves. And dealing with concerns of health Parliamentary and Scientific technology transfer can look physics-based skills are and nutrition. A multi-disciplinary Committee) and John very different for these applicable throughout the approach is necessary to tackle Stevenson MP (for the APPG for organisations compared to the industry, from breaking these and physics has a critical Food and Drink Manufacturing) highly sophisticated multi- problems down to first role to play, from soft examples were given of how national organisations (many of principles, through generating condensed matter research, science has and is transforming which have research and testable hypotheses and insights from computer the food and drink available. development laboratories in the working with complex maths, to modelling and advanced Manufacturers offer greater UK). Helen also talked about creating simulations to make predictions as to how food will measurement techniques. variety, higher quality, and more the huge diversity of scientific and technology skills that are behave. convenience than ever before, Food manufacturing is a large, needed within the industry, from and tomorrow’s consumer will But there’s a general lack of diverse sector in which physics sensory scientists, to have different needs again to awareness of this elsewhere. plays a crucial role and which microbiologists, and process those of today. Central to these That crucial role of physics in can benefit enormously from engineers. changes is the investment in the food sector needs to be fully physics-based innovation. science, research and innovation Next to present was John recognised – and taken full Physics is a significant lever in – used to increase shelf life, Bows, Research and advantage of. If we create the food manufacturing – it tackles reformulate products to improve Development Director at conditions in which food all of the industry’s main diets, and drive productivity and PepsiCo. John was speaking in manufacturing can flourish, the challenges. But if the sector is to 2 Science in Parliament | Vol 74 No 1 | Spring 2018 Leadership Council was the final speaker at the event, bringing to life how science has enabled all aspects of the transformation to our modern, developed food system delivering safe, affordable, nutritious and high quality food for all, addressing the challenges of the 20th Century. A visit to a modern food manufacturer can be a surprise for many, encountering for the first time the levels of science and technology used: from analytical chemistries also found in the pharmaceutical sector; computational modelling, in- silica simulation and material sciences also adopted in the aerospace sector and process automation, sensor technologies and control systems at levels common in state of the art manufacturing.
Recommended publications
  • A Short History of the Royal Aeronautical Society

    A Short History of the Royal Aeronautical Society

    A SHORT HISTORY OF THE ROYAL AERONAUTICAL SOCIETY Royal Aeronautical Society Council Dinner at the Science Museum on 26 May 1932 with Guest of Honour Miss Amelia Earhart. Edited by Chris Male MRAeS Royal Aeronautical Society www.aerosociety.com Afterburner Society News RAeS 150th ANNIVERSARY www.aerosociety.com/150 The Royal Aeronautical Society: Part 1 – The early years The Beginning “At a meeting held at Argyll Lodge, Campden Hill, Right: The first Aeronautical on 12 January 1866, His Grace The Duke of Argyll Exhibition, Crystal Palace, 1868, showing the presiding; also present Mr James Glaisher, Dr Hugh Stringfellow Triplane model W. Diamond, Mr F.H. Wenham, Mr James Wm. Butler and other exhibits. No fewer and Mr F.W. Brearey. Mr Glaisher read the following than 77 exhibits were address: collected together, including ‘The first application of the Balloon as a means of engines, lighter- and heavier- than-air models, kites and ascending into the upper regions of the plans of projected machines. atmosphere has been almost within the recollection A special Juror’s Report on on ‘Aerial locomotion and the laws by which heavy of men now living but with the exception of some the exhibits was issued. bodies impelled through air are sustained’. of the early experimenters it has scarcely occupied Below: Frederick W Brearey, Wenham’s lecture is now one of the aeronautical Secretary of the the attention of scientific men, nor has the subject of Aeronautical Society of Great classics and was the beginning of the pattern of aeronautics been properly recognised as a distinct Britain, 1866-1896.
  • 2019 Trustees' Annual Report and Financial Statements

    2019 Trustees' Annual Report and Financial Statements

    Science Council Annual Report and Financial Statements For the year ended 31st December 2019 Registered Charity no. 1131661 1 Science Council Reference and administrative details Annual Report and Financial statements for the year ended 31st December 2019 Contents Page Title Page Number Reference and administrative details 2 Chair’s report 3-4 Chief Executive’s report 5-6 Board of Trustees’ Annual Report Structure, governance and management 7-16 Achievements, performance and plans for future periods 17-32 Financial review 33-35 Statement of Trustees’ responsibilities 36 Independent auditor’s report 37-39 Statement of financial activities 40 Balance sheet 41 Statement of cash flows 42 Notes to the financial statements 43-54 1 Science Council Reference and administrative details Annual Report and Financial statements for the year ended 31st December 2019 Reference and administrative details Registered Office Fora Space, 71 Central Street, London, EC1V 8AB Charity number 1131661 Bankers HSBC 39 Tottenham Court Road London W1T 2AR Accountants Excluserv Limited 1 Fore Street Avenue London EC2Y 9DT Legal advisers Bates Wells Braithwaite 10 Queen Street Place London EC4R 1BE Auditors Kreston Reeves LLP 37 St Margaret's Street Canterbury Kent CT1 2TU Website www.sciencecouncil.org 2 Science Council Board of Trustees’ Annual Report Financial statements for the year ended 31st December 2019 Chair’s report Welcome to the Science Council’s Annual Report 2019. As I write this, the government has announced sweeping measures to manage the impact of COVID-19. There is no doubt that the impact will be significant and long-lasting. In a time when it seems that evidence and scientific expertise have not always been used to inform public policy, it is encouraging that the UK government has stated that its strategy to minimise the spread is being informed by the science.
  • Evidence Synthesis on the EU-UK Relationship on Research and Innovation January 2018

    Evidence Synthesis on the EU-UK Relationship on Research and Innovation January 2018

    Evidence synthesis on the EU-UK relationship on research and innovation January 2018 1. Introduction The Royal Society and the Wellcome Trust have undertaken a rapid evidence synthesis on the EU-UK research and innovation relationship as part of their Future Partnership Project. Organisations and individuals were invited to submit evidence and analyses for inclusion. Evidence was also gathered through internet searches to ensure an inclusive approach. The Annex is a summary of the methods. Two questions were used in gathering evidence and in determining the material in scope: 1. What incentives, infrastructure and mechanisms can be accessed by research and innovation organisations, funders and individuals in Member States to support collaborations? 2. How do Member States currently use and benefit from these and how might they be affected by Brexit? This paper is a synthesis of the evidence and covers funding, infrastructures, mobility, collaboration and regulation, with a focus on links between the EU and the UK. 2. Overview of the evidence base A few major reports were of particular relevance; the Royal Society’s three reports on the role of the EU in UK research and innovation and two reports commissioned from Technopolis Group by UK organisations, on the role of EU funding in UK research and innovation and the impact of collaboration: the value of UK medical research to EU science and health1,2. These documents were often referenced in other submissions. A report from the Lords Science and Technology Committee’s inquiry on EU Membership and UK Science also summarises many sources of evidence relevant to this synthesis.
  • Common Acronyms Engineers SOE Society of Operations Engineers Licensed Members TWI the Welding Institute BCS the Chartered Institute for IT

    Common Acronyms Engineers SOE Society of Operations Engineers Licensed Members TWI the Welding Institute BCS the Chartered Institute for IT

    SEE Society of Environmental Common Acronyms Engineers SOE Society of Operations Engineers Licensed Members TWI The Welding Institute BCS The Chartered Institute for IT BINDT British Institute of Non-Destructive Testing Professional Affiliates CIBSE Chartered Institution of Building ACostE Association of Cost Engineers Services Engineers APM Association for Project CIHT Chartered Institution of Highways Management and Transportation CABE Chartered Association of Building CIPHE Chartered Institute of Plumbing and Engineers Heating Engineering CQI Chartered Quality Institute CIWEM Chartered Institution of Water and IAEA Institute of Automotive Engineer Environmental Management Assessors EI Energy Institute IAT Institute of Asphalt Technology IAgrE Institution of Agricultural Engineers ICES Chartered Institution of Civil ICE Institution of Civil Engineers Engineering Surveyors IChemE Institution of Chemical Engineers ICorr Institute of Corrosion ICME Institute of Cast Metals Engineers ICT Institute of Concrete Technology IED Institution of Engineering IDE Institute of Demolition Engineers Designers IDGTE Institution of Diesel and Gas IET Institution of Engineering and Turbine Engineers Technology IExpE Institute of Explosives Engineers IFE Institution of Fire Engineers IMA Institute of Mathematics and its IGEM Institution of Gas Engineers and Applications Managers IMF Institute of Materials Finishing IHE Institute of Highway Engineers INCOSE UK International Council on Systems Engineering (UK Chapter) IHEEM Institute of Healthcare Engineering
  • Wellcome Trust Annual Report and Financial Statements 2018 Is © the Wellcome Trust and Is Licensed Under Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 UK

    Wellcome Trust Annual Report and Financial Statements 2018 Is © the Wellcome Trust and Is Licensed Under Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 UK

    Annual Report and Financial Statements 2018 Table of contents Report from Chair 3 Report from Director 4 Trustee’s Report 5 What we do 6 Review of Charitable Activities 7 Review of Investment Activities 18 Financial Review 28 Structure and Governance 33 Social Responsibility 38 Risk Management 40 Remuneration Report 42 Nomination Committee Report 44 Remuneration Committee Report 45 Investment Committee Report 46 Audit and Risk Committee Report 47 Independent Auditor’s Report 49 Financial Statements 59 Consolidated Statement of Financial Activities 60 Consolidated Balance Sheet 61 Statement of Financial Activities of the Trust 62 Balance Sheet of the Trust 63 Consolidated Cash Flow Statement 64 Notes to the Financial Statements 65 Reference and Administrative Details 116 2 Table of Contents Wellcome Trust Annual Report 2018 Report from Chair In March 2018, the Board of Governors and I year, driven by the performance of the investment decided to reappoint Jeremy Farrar as Director portfolio, which returned 13.4%, or 10.7% after of Wellcome for a further five years. Under his inflation. This year has seen a return of market leadership, Wellcome is ambitious, innovative and volatility as the economic cycle has matured. willing to take risks in pursuit of our mission of Central Banks, led by the US Federal Reserve, have improving health by helping great ideas to thrive. begun to raise interest rates and remove the prop to Wellcome’s work is underpinned by the financial asset prices previously provided by quantitative strength we derive from our £25.9 billion investment easing. Uncertainties about Brexit have generated portfolio.
  • Royal Society, 1985

    Royal Society, 1985

    The Public Understanding of Science Report of a Royal Society adhoc Group endorsed by the Council of the Royal Society The Royal Society 6 Carlton House Terrace London SWlY 5AG CONTENTS Page Preface 5 Summary 6 1. Introduction 7 2. Why it matters 9 3. The present position 12 4. Formal education 17 5. The mass media 2 1 6. ' The scientific community 24 7. Public lectures, children's activities, museums and libraries 27 8. Industry 29 9. Conclusions and recommendations 31 Annexes A. List of those submitting evidence B. Visits and seminars C. Selected bibliography PREFACE This report was prepared by an ad hoc group under the chairmanship of Dr W.F. Bodmer, F.R.S.; it has been endorsed by the Council of the Royal Society. It deals with an issue that is important not only, or even mainly, for the scientific community but also for the nation as a whole and for each individual within it. More than ever, people need some understanding of science, whether they are involved in decision-making at a national or local level, in managing industrial companies, in skilled or semi-skilled employment, in voting as private citizens or in making a wide range of personal decisions. In publishing this report the Council hopes that it will highlight this need for an overall awareness of the nature of science and, more particularly, of the way that science and technology pervade modern life, and that it will generate both debate and decisions on how best they can be fostered. The report makes a number of recommendations.
  • Guidance for Applicants

    Guidance for Applicants

    Guidance for applicants The British Academy, Royal Academy of Engineering and A full list of the disciplines covered by the Academies can the Royal Society are three of five Designated Competent be found in the ‘Guidance on Policy for UK visas under Tier Bodies (DCBs) appointed by the Home Office to assess 1 (Exceptional Talent)’ document available on the Home applications for the Research and Innovation Talent Visa Office website. under the Home Office Tier 1 (Exceptional Talent) Visa route. Holders of a Research and Innovation Talent Visa that were As DCBs, the Academies are responsible for considering endorsed through Exceptional Talent are eligible to apply whether an individual who makes an application for settlement (Indefinite Leave to Remain) after three years. is demonstrably ‘exceptionally talented’ or has Holders endorsed through Exceptional Promise are eligible ‘exceptional promise’. after five years. Tier 1 (Exceptional Talent) is subject to a limit of 2,000 visas per year (beginning on 6 April one year and ending on 5 April the following year). The Academies assess applications in the following areas and are allocated a minumum number of endorsements by the Home Office from the total annual pool. • The British Academy – for humanities and social sciences (150 endorsements); • The Royal Society – for natural sciences and medical science research (250 endorsements); • The Royal Academy of Engineering – for engineering (150 endorsements). TIER 1 APPLICATION GUIDANCE 1 Overview of the application process The application for a Research & Innovation Talent visa Should the decision be upheld then the process ends here. (Tier 1 Exceptional Talent) is in two stages: You can still apply via another visa route or re-apply to this route with revised supporting evidence.
  • Chemistry for All Reducing Inequalities in Chemistry Aspirations and Attitudes

    Chemistry for All Reducing Inequalities in Chemistry Aspirations and Attitudes

    Chemistry for All Reducing inequalities in chemistry aspirations and attitudes Institute of Education 2 Chemistry for All Reducing inequalities in chemistry aspirations and attitudes Findings from the Chemistry for All research and evaluation programme November 2020 Authors Dr Tamjid Mujtaba Dr Richard Sheldrake Professor Michael J. Reiss UCL Institute of Education, University College London Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank the students and staff from across the participating schools. The authors would also like to thank the Chemistry for All programme delivery teams and members of the programme steering group. The research was conducted independently by the UCL Institute of Education with funding from the Royal Society of Chemistry. For further information For further information on the Chemistry for All project, including requests for related publications or the next phase of the work, please contact Dr Tamjid Mujtaba ([email protected]). 3 1. Executive summary 5 9.3. Results for science as of Year 11 82 1.1. Background and context 6 9.3.1. Predicting students’ science aspirations 1.2. Chemistry for All programme 7 (A-Level, university, jobs) as of Year 11 82 1.3. Research and evaluation programme 7 9.3.2. Predicting students’ science aspirations for A-Level as of Year 11 85 CONTENTS 1.4. Research results and insights 8 1.4.1. Insights into students’ changing attitudes and aspirations 8 9.3.3. Predicting students’ science aspirations for careers as of Year 11 86 1.4.2. Insights into students’ attitudes and views 9 9.3.4. Predicting students’ science aspirations for university 1.4.3.
  • Quadram Institute Newsletter

    Quadram Institute Newsletter

    Autumn 2019 Welcome to the newsle�er of the Quadram Ins�tute. This issue highlights recent research breakthroughs at the We con�nue to build our team and are pleased to welcome Quadram Ins�tute (QI) that could have posi�ve impacts on Professor Cynthia Whitchurch to the QI. Cynthia is se�ng public health. Working with clinicians our researchers have up a research group inves�ga�ng bacterial lifestyles, and shown how the latest sequencing technologies can aid in how these make them more infec�ous or resistant to diagnos�cs and surveillance. Coupling these techniques an�microbials. Cynthia joins us from the ithree ins�tute at with ‘Big Data’ analy�cal approaches will be vital to the University of Technology Sydney. Her research led to addressing 21st century popula�on health challenges, and the discovery that extracellular DNA is required for biofilm the QI aims to be a leader in this area. development. Big Data in the NHS was the topic of a roundtable We con�nue to welcome visitors to our new building to discussion I a�ended with Patricia Hart at the policy share our vision to understand how food and microbes development think tank Reform. This roundtable was interact to promote health and prevent disease. In June, we sponsored by QI and explored how universi�es and industry had the honour of hos�ng His Excellency Simon Smits, can work with government to realise poten�al applica�ons Ambassador of the Netherlands to the UK. The Ambassador of Big Data. The event was chaired by Baroness Blackwood, visited the Norwich Research Park as part of an Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department of interna�onal trade delega�on to East Anglia to learn about Health and Social Care (DHSC) and included senior the region’s world-leading life sciences research and trade policy-makers, public service prac��oners, academics and opportuni�es.
  • The Case for a Gender Lens in STEM THROUGH BOTH Eyes: the Case for a Gender Lens in STEM ‘Think of a Gender Lens As Putting on Spectacles

    The Case for a Gender Lens in STEM THROUGH BOTH Eyes: the Case for a Gender Lens in STEM ‘Think of a Gender Lens As Putting on Spectacles

    THE CASE FOR A GENDER LENS IN STEM THROUGH BOTH eyes: The case for a gender lens in STEM ‘Think of a gender lens as putting on spectacles. Out of one lens of the spectacles, you see the participation, needs and realities of women. Out of the other lens, you see the participation, needs and realities of men. Your sight or vision is the combination of what each eye sees.’ 2 contents Contents EXECUTive summary 4 1.0 introduction 7 2.0 Challenges 8 3.0 Solutions 23 Sir Peter Luff MP: A Call to Action 49 References 50 Authorship & Credits 51 ‘The country urgently needs more young people with STEM qualifications, which means we have to get more girls and women involved. This should be at the heart of education and skills policy – it isn’t an optional extra left to a few passionate enthusiasts. We have to make it everyone’s business’ Helen Wollaston, Director WISE ‘Our research shows that it is harder for girls to balance, or reconcile, their interest in science with femininity. The solution won’t lie in trying to change girls. The causes are rooted in, and perpetuated by, wider societal attitudes and social structures. We also need to think about the whole structure of our education system in England, which essentially channels children into narrow ‘tracks’ from a young age’ Professor Louise Archer, Director of ASPIRES, ‘The lack of girls and women in STEM blights lead coordinatior of TISME our society and our economy. There is no single solution, which is why I am glad to see that Sciencegrrl have come forward with a wide range of recommendations covering education, careers and the broader cultural challenges’ Chi Onwurah, MP for Newcastle upon Tyne ‘We are working to maximise employer engagement to help put science and maths in a careers context.
  • Engineering UK 2020 Report

    Engineering UK 2020 Report

    Engineering UK 2020 Educational pathways into engineering Engineering UK 2020 Foreword Educational pathways into engineering Authors EngineeringUK would like to express sincere A central part of EngineeringUK’s work is to provide educators, policy-makers, industrialists and others with the most gratitude and special thanks to the following up-to-date analyses and insight. Since 2005, our EngineeringUK State of Engineering report has portrayed the breadth of Luke Armitage the sector, how it is changing and who is working within it, as well as quantifying students on educational pathways into Senior Research Analyst, EngineeringUK individuals, who contributed thought pieces or engineering and considering whether they will meet future workforce needs. Despite numerous changes of government Mollie Bourne acted as critical readers for this report: and educational policy, the 2008 recession and the advent of Brexit, the need for the UK to respond to the COVID-19 Research and Impact Manager, EngineeringUK Amanda Dickins pandemic has provided the most uncertain and challenging context to date for our research. Jess Di Simone Head of Impact and Development, STEM Learning Research Officer, EngineeringUK Teresa Frith Anna Jones Senior Skills Policy Manager, Association of Colleges Research Officer, EngineeringUK Ruth Gilligan Stephanie Neave Assistant Director for Equality Charters, AdvanceHE Our analyses for this report started before the pandemic • Ambitious plans to expand technical education are heavily Head of Research, EngineeringUK began. In light of the current and rapidly changing educational reliant on employers and may not have considered the Aimee Higgins environment, EngineeringUK has not sought to update our specific requirements of engineering. It will be even harder to Director of Employers and Partnerships, The Careers & findings.
  • Scientific Infrastructure House of Lords Science & Technology Select

    Scientific Infrastructure House of Lords Science & Technology Select

    Scientific Infrastructure House of Lords Science & Technology Select Committee Science Council Evidence The Science Council 1. The Science Council was established in 2004. It is an umbrella organisation of learned societies and professional bodies, and currently has 41 member organisations drawn from across science and its applications: a list of member bodies is attached. In addition to providing a mechanism for the sector to work collectively, the Science Council develops and leads collaborative projects working with member bodies and the wider scientific community: examples include the Future Morph website 1 designed to provide young people with information about careers opportunities, and LMI analysis of the UK Science Workforce. 2 2. The Science Council also works to advance the professional practice of science and since 2004 has awarded the professional qualification of Chartered Scientist (CSci) with 15,000 individuals currently registered. With the aim of raising the profile, aspirations and retention of scientists at graduate and non­graduate levels, professional registration was extended in 2012 to include Registered Scientist and Registered Science Technician. 3. Collectively the Science Council member bodies represent more than 400,000 individual members, including scientists, teachers and senior executives in industry, academia and the public sector. 4. In preparing this submission we have consulted member bodies to identify areas of common interest and the issues they raised form the content of this submission. This includes the importance of developing and nurturing a skills infrastructure to complement investment in physical scientific infrastructure, and the need for the UK to be a strong contributor to international scientific infrastructure programmes.