Research Report Is Uploaded Onto the Policy Innovation and Co-Ordination Office’S (PICO’S) Website for Public Reference

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Research Report Is Uploaded Onto the Policy Innovation and Co-Ordination Office’S (PICO’S) Website for Public Reference PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH FUNDING SCHEME 公共政策研究資助計劃 Project Number : 項目編號: 2015.A5.019.16B Project Title : Youth Radicalism in Hong Kong: Exploring Changes in 項目名稱: Adolescents' Civic Consciousness and Attitudes to the Nation 香港青年的激進主義:探索青少年時期學生的公民意識 及對國家態度之變化 Principal Investigator : 首席研究員: Professor Kerry John KENNEDY Institution/Think Tank : The Education University of Hong Kong 院校 /智庫: 香港教育大學 Project Duration (Month): 推行期 (月) : 10.5 Funding (HK$) : 總金額 (HK$): 569,905.00 This research report is uploaded onto the Policy Innovation and Co-ordination Office’s (PICO’s) website for public reference. The views expressed in this report are those of the Research Team of this project and do not represent the views of PICO and/or the Assessment Panel. PICO and/or the Assessment Panel do not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this report. Please observe the “Intellectual Property Rights & Use of Project Data” as stipulated in the Guidance Notes of the Public Policy Research Funding Scheme. A suitable acknowledgement of the funding from PICO should be included in any publication/publicity arising from the work done on a research project funded in whole or in part by PICO. The English version shall prevail whenever there is any discrepancy between the English and Chinese versions. 此研究報告已上載至政策創新與統籌辦事處(創新辦)網站,供公眾查閱。報告內所表 達的意見純屬本項目研究團隊的意見,並不代表創新辦及/或評審委員會的意見。創新辦及/或 評審委員會不保證報告所載的資料準確無誤。 請遵守公共政策研究資助計劃申請須知內關於「知識產權及項目數據的使用」的規定。 接受創新辦全數或部分資助的研究項目如因研究工作須出版任何刊物/作任何宣傳,均 須在其中加入適當鳴謝,註明獲創新辦資助。 中英文版本如有任何歧異,概以英文版本為準。 YOUTH RADICALISM IN HONG KONG: EXPLORING CHANGES IN ADOLESCENTS’ CIVIC CONSCIOUSNESS AND ATTITUDES TO THE NATION 1 香港青年的激進主義:探索青少年時期學生的公民意識及對國家態度之變化 Project 2015.A5.019.16B FINAL REPORT2 1 Project 2015.A5.019.16B was funded by the Central Policy Unit of the Hong Kong SAR Government. 2 This Report was prepared by Professor Kerry J Kennedy, Dr Li Lijuan and Dr Ng Hoi Yu TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 LIST OF TABLES 4 LIST OF FIGURES 5 ABSTRACT 6 POLICY IMPLICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 9 PROJECT OBJECTIVES AND RATIONALE 12 Project Objectives .................................................................................................................. 12 Policy Relevance .................................................................................................................... 12 Key Questions ........................................................................................................................ 13 Project Rationale/Background ............................................................................................. 14 Summary ................................................................................................................................ 24 CHAPTER 2 25 PROJECT METHODOLOGY AND METHODS 25 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 25 Methods .................................................................................................................................. 26 Participants ............................................................................................................................ 28 Data Analysis ......................................................................................................................... 28 CHAPTER 3 31 THEORETICAL AND CONCEPTUAL ISSUES: UNDERSTANDING YOUTH RADICALISM IN HONG KONG 31 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 31 What is radicalism? ............................................................................................................... 31 Youth radicalism in Hong Kong: A historical account ...................................................... 34 Factors Contributing to the Recent Rise of Youth Radicalism ......................................... 38 The focus of the Report ......................................................................................................... 41 CHAPTER 4 43 THE CIVIC PROFILE OF YOUNG ADOLESCENTS IN HONG KONG: PRELUDE TO RADICALISM? 43 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 43 Socio-demographic Profiles of the 1999 Cohort and 2009 Cohort Secondary Students ..................................................................................................................... 45 Creating Civic Profiles through Identifying Distinct Groups of Individuals ................... 48 Socio-demographic Information of the Student Clusters in Each Cohort ....................... 49 Respective “Profiles” of the Two Cohorts of Students ....................................................... 58 2 How do Groups within Each Cohort Differ from One Another Considering Some Other Civic Elements? ................................................................................... 63 Summary ................................................................................................................................ 67 Conclusion .............................................................................................................................. 68 Extension ................................................................................................................................ 69 CHAPTER 5 74 FROM ADOLESCENCE TO ADULTHOOD: THE RADICALIZATION OF CIVIC ENGAGEMENT 74 Abstract .................................................................................................................................. 74 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 74 Sampling Procedures, Interviewees, and Data Analysis .................................................... 75 What Does Radicalism Mean to the Interviewees? ............................................................ 79 Radicalization Process and the Leading Factors ................................................................ 84 Major Factors Contributing to Radicalization ................................................................... 95 Critical Political Events ...................................................................................... 95 Daily and Personal Experiences ........................................................................ 97 School Education ................................................................................................ 98 Chinese History Teachers .................................................................................. 99 Family Socialization ........................................................................................... 99 Peers and Social Networks ............................................................................... 100 Politicians and Opinion Leaders ..................................................................... 101 Media and the Internet ..................................................................................... 101 Summary .............................................................................................................................. 103 CHAPTER 6 104 CONCLUSIONS 104 Summary .............................................................................................................................. 118 References 119 Appendices 127 Appendix 1: Common items and factors used in both the 1999 CivED and 2009 ICCS surveys.................................................................................................. 127 Appendix 2: Tables and Graphs Reporting the Results of Latent Profile Analysis ................................................................................................................... 139 Appendix 3: Project Description (English and Chinese) ................................................. 148 Appendix 4: Interview Guide (English and Chinese) ....................................................... 154 3 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Socio-demographic Information of the 1999 Cohort of Students ............................. 46 Table 2. Socio-demographic Information of the 2009 Cohort of Students ............................. 47 Table 3. Comparison of Item Means across the Two Cohorts ................................................ 51 Table 4. Comparison of Factor Means across the 1999 and 2009 Cohorts ............................. 53 Table 5. Response Patterns to the Items Measuring Civic Trust and National Attitudes (the 1999 cohort) ............................................................................................................................ 55 Table 6. Response Patterns to the Items Measuring Civic Trust and National Attitudes (the 2009 cohort) ............................................................................................................................ 57 Table 7. Changes of the Proportions of the Three Groups Over Time .................................... 58 Table 8. Socio-demographic information of the 1999 cohort (By clusters) ........................... 60 Table 9. Socio-demographic Information of the 2009 Cohort (By Clusters) .......................... 61 Table 10. Comparison of Civic Knowledge Mean Scores across the groups within the respective 1999 and 2009 cohorts ........................................................................................... 62 Table 11. Comparison of Civic Values, Attitudes, Behaviors, and Behavioural Intentions across the Two Cohorts ..........................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • CHAPTER 3 Hong Kong Music Ecosphere
    Abstract The people of Hong Kong experienced their deepest sense of insecurity and anxiety after the handover of sovereignty to Beijing. Time and again, the incapacity and lack of credibility of the SAR government has been manifested in various new policies or incidents. Hong Kong people’s anger and discontent with the government have reached to the peak. On July 1, 2003, the sixth anniversary of the hand-over of Hong Kong to China, 500,000 demonstrators poured through the streets of Hong Kong to voice their concerns over the proposed legislation of Article 23 and their dissatisfaction to the SAR government. And the studies of politics and social movement are still dominated by accounts of open confrontations in the form of large scale and organized rebellions and protests. If we shift our focus on the terrain of everyday life, we can find that the youth voice out their discontents by different ways, such as various kinds of media. This research aims to fill the gap and explore the relationship between popular culture and politics of the youth in Hong Kong after 1997 by using one of the local bands KingLyChee as a case study. Politically, it aims at discovering the hidden voices of the youth and argues that the youth are not seen as passive victims of structural factors such as education system, market and family. Rather they are active and strategic actors who are capable of negotiating with and responding to the social change of Hong Kong society via employing popular culture like music by which the youth obtain their pleasure of producing their own meanings of social experience and the pleasure of avoiding the social discipline of the power-bloc.
    [Show full text]
  • Discourse, Social Scales, and Epiphenomenality of Language Policy: a Case Study of a Local, Hong Kong NGO
    Discourse, Social Scales, and Epiphenomenality of Language Policy: A Case Study of a Local, Hong Kong NGO Item Type text; Electronic Dissertation Authors Tso, Elizabeth Ann Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 27/09/2021 12:25:43 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/623063 DISCOURSE, SOCIAL SCALES, AND EPIPHENOMENALITY OF LANGUAGE POLICY: A CASE STUDY OF A LOCAL, HONG KONG NGO by Elizabeth Ann Tso __________________________ Copyright © Elizabeth Ann Tso 2017 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the GRADUATE INTERDISCIPLINARY PROGRAM IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION AND TEACHING In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2017 2 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE As members of the Dissertation Committee, we certify that we have read the dissertation prepared by Elizabeth Tso, titled Discourse, Social Scales, and Epiphenomenality of Language Policy: A Case Study of a Local, Hong Kong NGO, and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. _______________________________________________ Date: (January 13, 2017) Perry Gilmore _______________________________________________ Date: (January 13, 2017) Wenhao Diao _______________________________________________ Date: (January 13, 2017) Sheilah Nicholas Final approval and acceptance of this dissertation is contingent upon the candidate’s submission of the final copies of the dissertation to the Graduate College.
    [Show full text]
  • In Hong Kong the Political Economy of the Asia Pacific
    The Political Economy of the Asia Pacific Fujio Mizuoka Contrived Laissez- Faireism The Politico-Economic Structure of British Colonialism in Hong Kong The Political Economy of the Asia Pacific Series editor Vinod K. Aggarwal More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/7840 Fujio Mizuoka Contrived Laissez-Faireism The Politico-Economic Structure of British Colonialism in Hong Kong Fujio Mizuoka Professor Emeritus Hitotsubashi University Kunitachi, Tokyo, Japan ISSN 1866-6507 ISSN 1866-6515 (electronic) The Political Economy of the Asia Pacific ISBN 978-3-319-69792-5 ISBN 978-3-319-69793-2 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69793-2 Library of Congress Control Number: 2017956132 © Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication.
    [Show full text]
  • In Hong Kong Restrictions on Rights to Peaceful Assembly and Freedom of Expression and Association
    BEIJING’S “RED LINE” IN HONG KONG RESTRICTIONS ON RIGHTS TO PEACEFUL ASSEMBLY AND FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION AND ASSOCIATION Amnesty International is a global movement of more than 7 million people who campaign for a world where human rights are enjoyed by all. Our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights standards. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and public donations. © Amnesty International 2019 Cover photo: An estimated 1.03 million people in Hong Kong took to the streets to protest the Extradition Except where otherwise noted, content in this document is licensed under a Creative Commons Bill on 9 June 2019. (Photo credit: Amnesty International) (attribution, non-commercial, no derivatives, international 4.0) licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode For more information please visit the permissions page on our website: www.amnesty.org Where material is attributed to a copyright owner other than Amnesty International this material is not subject to the Creative Commons licence. First published in 2019 by Amnesty International Ltd Peter Benenson House, 1 Easton Street London WC1X 0DW, UK Index: ASA 17/0944/2019 Original language: English amnesty.org CONTENTS CONTENTS 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 1. BEIJING’S “RED LINE” IN HONG KONG 8 1.1 THE SINO-BRITISH JOINT DECLARATION AND THE BASIC LAW 8 1.2 NATIONAL SECURITY LEGISLATION 9 1.3 THE WHITE PAPER ON “ONE COUNTRY, TWO SYSTEMS” 10 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Perspectives Chinoises, 2018-3
    Perspectives chinoises 2018-3 | 2018 Vingt ans après : transformations et défis de Hong Kong sous le régime chinois Édition électronique URL : http://journals.openedition.org/perspectiveschinoises/8408 ISSN : 1996-4609 Éditeur Centre d'étude français sur la Chine contemporaine Édition imprimée Date de publication : 1 septembre 2018 ISSN : 1021-9013 Référence électronique Perspectives chinoises, 2018-3 | 2018, « Vingt ans après : transformations et défis de Hong Kong sous le régime chinois » [En ligne], mis en ligne le 01 septembre 2019, consulté le 01 avril 2020. URL : http:// journals.openedition.org/perspectiveschinoises/8408 Ce document a été généré automatiquement le 1 avril 2020. © Tous droits réservés 1 SOMMAIRE Dossier Vingt ans après la rétrocession : des transformations économiques et politiques de Hong Kong et de son avenir sous le régime chinois Éditorial Jean-Pierre Cabestan et Éric Florence Évolution de l’économie politique des médias hongkongais Francis L. F. Lee Le « localisme » à Hong Kong depuis la rétrocession Une approche évènementielle Samson Yuen et Sanho Chung Boom immobilier et essor du localisme à Hong Kong Témoignage de l’élection du Conseil législatif en 2016 Stan Hok-Wui Wong et Kin Man Wan Désarticulation entre les valeurs civiques et le nationalisme Cartographie du nationalisme d’État chinois après la rétrocession de Hong Kong Chi Kit Chan et Anthony Ying Him Fung Les demandeurs d’asile, symboles de la non-sinité de Hong Kong Le cas d’une enquête dans Chungking Mansions Gordon Mathews Articles Jeunes militantes
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    HNP DISCUSSION PAPER Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Economics of Tobacco Control Paper No. 21 Research on Tobacco in China: About this series... An annotated bibliography of research on tobacco This series is produced by the Health, Nutrition, and Population Family (HNP) of the World Bank’s Human Development Network. The papers in this series aim to provide a vehicle for use, health effects, policies, farming and industry publishing preliminary and unpolished results on HNP topics to encourage discussion and Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized debate. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper are entirely those of the author(s) and should not be attributed in any manner to the World Bank, to its affiliated organizations or to members of its Board of Executive Directors or the countries they represent. Citation and the use of material presented in this series should take into account this provisional character. For free copies of papers in this series please contact the individual authors whose name appears on the paper. Joy de Beyer, Nina Kollars, Nancy Edwards, and Harold Cheung Enquiries about the series and submissions should be made directly to the Managing Editor Joy de Beyer ([email protected]) or HNP Advisory Service ([email protected], tel 202 473-2256, fax 202 522-3234). For more information, see also www.worldbank.org/hnppublications. The Economics of Tobacco Control sub-series is produced jointly with the Tobacco Free Initiative of the World Health Organization. The findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed in this paper are entirely those of the authors and should not be attributed in any Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized manner to the World Health Organization or to the World Bank, their affiliated organizations or members of their Executive Boards or the countries they represent.
    [Show full text]
  • ENCROACHMENTS on PRESS FREEDOM in HONG KONG Threatened Harbor Encroachments on Press Freedom in Hong Kong
    THREATENED HARBOR ENCROACHMENTS ON PRESS FREEDOM IN HONG KONG Threatened Harbor Encroachments on Press Freedom in Hong Kong January 16, 2015 © PEN American Center 2015 All rights reserved PEN American Center is the largest branch of PEN International, the world’s leading literary and human rights organization. PEN works in more than 100 countries to protect free expression and to defend writers and journalists who are imprisoned, threatened, persecuted, or attacked in the course of their profession. PEN America’s 3,700 members stand together with more than 20,000 PEN writers worldwide in international literary fellowship to carry on the achievements of such past members as James Baldwin, Robert Frost, Allen Ginsberg, Langston Hughes, Arthur Miller, Eugene O’Neill, Susan Sontag, and John Steinbeck. For more information, please visit www.pen.org. Cover photograph: © Gareth Hayes, Creative Commons CONTENTS Introduction 4 Report Framework and Methodology 6 Legal Framework 7 Challenges to Press Freedom in Hong Kong 9 Physical Assaults on Journalists 9 Attacks on and Obstruction of Media During the Pro-Democracy Protests 11 Threats to Free Expression Online 14 Politically Motivated Censorship and Removal of Media Figures 17 Politically Motivated Economic Pressures on Media Outlets 20 Recommendations 22 References 23 Appendix: Alleged Incidents of Violence Against Journalists During the 2014 Pro-Democracy Protests As Reported to the Hong Kong Journalists Association 23 INTRODUCTION Hong Kong has long enjoyed a vibrant, diverse, and independent passed in 1990 by the Chinese National People’s Congress, also media and a unique position as a window into mainland China. explicitly protects the rights of Hong Kong’s residents through Local and foreign correspondents make use of Hong Kong’s the year 2047, including the freedom of speech, freedom of unique geopolitical position, cosmopolitanism, and strong the press, and freedom of assembly.
    [Show full text]
  • China (Includes Tibet, Hong Kong, and Macau) 2016 Human Rights Report
    CHINA (INCLUDES TIBET, HONG KONG, AND MACAU) 2016 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The People’s Republic of China (PRC) is an authoritarian state in which the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is the paramount authority. CCP members hold almost all top government and security apparatus positions. Ultimate authority rests with the CCP Central Committee’s 25-member Political Bureau (Politburo) and its seven-member Standing Committee. Xi Jinping continued to hold the three most powerful positions as CCP general secretary, state president, and chairman of the Central Military Commission. Civilian authorities maintained control of the military and internal security forces. Repression and coercion of organizations and individuals involved in civil and political rights advocacy as well as in public interest and ethnic minority issues remained severe. As in previous years, citizens did not have the right to choose their government and elections were restricted to the lowest local levels of governance. Authorities prevented independent candidates from running in those elections, such as delegates to local people’s congresses. Citizens had limited forms of redress against official abuse. Other serious human rights abuses included arbitrary or unlawful deprivation of life, executions without due process, illegal detentions at unofficial holding facilities known as “black jails,” torture and coerced confessions of prisoners, and detention and harassment of journalists, lawyers, writers, bloggers, dissidents, petitioners, and others whose actions the authorities deemed unacceptable. There was also a lack of due process in judicial proceedings, political control of courts and judges, closed trials, the use of administrative detention, failure to protect refugees and asylum seekers, extrajudicial disappearances of citizens, restrictions on nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), discrimination against women, minorities, and persons with disabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • China (Includes Tibet, Hong Kong, and Macau) 2017 Human Rights Report
    CHINA (INCLUDES TIBET, HONG KONG, AND MACAU) 2017 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The People’s Republic of China (PRC) is an authoritarian state in which the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is the paramount authority. CCP members hold almost all top government and security apparatus positions. Ultimate authority rests with the CCP Central Committee’s 25-member Political Bureau (Politburo) and its seven-member Standing Committee. Xi Jinping continued to hold the three most powerful positions as CCP general secretary, state president, and chairman of the Central Military Commission. At the 19th Communist Party Congress in October, the CCP reaffirmed Xi as the leader of China and the CCP for another five years. Civilian authorities maintained control of the military and internal security forces. The most significant human rights issues for which the government was responsible included: arbitrary or unlawful deprivation of life and executions without due process; extralegal measures such as forced disappearances, including extraterritorial ones; torture and coerced confessions of prisoners; arbitrary detention, including strict house arrest and administrative detention, and illegal detentions at unofficial holding facilities known as “black jails”; significant restrictions on freedom of speech, press, assembly, association, religion, and movement (for travel within the country and overseas), including detention and harassment of journalists, lawyers, writers, bloggers, dissidents, petitioners, and others as well as their family members;
    [Show full text]
  • Hong Kong * | Freedom House Page 1 of 6
    Hong Kong * | Freedom House Page 1 of 6 Hong Kong * freedomhouse.org Hong Kong received a downward trend arrow due to restrictions on press freedom and freedom of assembly surrounding protests against a Chinese government decision to limit candidate nominations for future executive elections. China’s growing political influence over Hong Kong encountered dramatic public resistance in 2014. In August, the Standing Committee of China’s National People’s Congress (NPC) issued a decision that would allow a popular vote for chief executive in the territory for the first time in 2017, but would empower an effectively pro-Beijing committee to control nominations for the contest. Prodemocracy groups criticized the decision, arguing that it violated promises of eventual universal suffrage that China had made under Hong Kong’s Basic Law and in a corresponding 2007 NPC Standing Committee decision. Long-standing disagreements between the authorities and a large section of the population over the degree of free choice in future elections came to a head in response to the ruling. Large student-led protests broke out in September, with demonstrators establishing encampments and barricades at several points in the city center. The occupations continued for more than two months, though the police periodically attempted to clear them, at times using tear gas and batons. The police were also accused of enabling violence by counterprotesters with alleged links to organized crime groups. The last encampments were removed by mid-December. Meanwhile, the territory’s press freedom suffered a sharp decline. The number of physical attacks on journalists increased during the year, major businesses withdrew advertising from critical media outlets, and reporters acknowledged the growing practice of self-censorship.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Dissertation FINAL2.Pdf
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of Communications AFTER A RAINY DAY IN HONG KONG: MEDIA, MEMORY AND SOCIAL MOVEMENTS, A LOOK AT HONG KONG’S 2014 UMBRELLA MOVEMENT A Dissertation in Mass Communications by Kelly A. Chernin © 2017 Kelly A. Chernin Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2017 The dissertation of Kelly A. Chernin was reviewed and approved* by the following: Matthew F. Jordan Associate Professor of Media Studies Dissertation Adviser Chair of Committee C. Michael Elavsky Associate Professor of Media Studies Michelle Rodino-Colocino Associate Professor of Media Studies Stephen H. Browne Liberal Arts Research Professor of Communication Arts and Sciences Ford Risley Professor of Communications Associate Dean of the College of Communications *Signatures are on file in the graduate school. ii ABSTRACT The period following an occupied social movement is often overlooked, yet it is an important moment in time as political and economic systems are potentially vulnerable. In 2014, after Hong Kong’s Chief Executive declared that the citizens of Hong Kong would be unable to democratically elect their leader in the upcoming 2017 election, a 79-day occupation of major city centers ensued. The memory of the three-month occupation, also known as the Umbrella Movement was instrumental in shaping a political identity for Hong Kong’s residents. Understanding social movements as a process and not a singular event, an analytic mode that problematizes linear temporal constructions, can help us move beyond the deterministic and celebratory views often associated with technology’s role in social movement activism.
    [Show full text]
  • Hong Kong Youth Radicalization from the Perspective of Relative Deprivation
    Contemporary Chinese Political Economy and Strategic Relations: An International Journal Vol. 4, No. 2, July/Aug. 2018, pp. 451-485 __________________________________________________________ Hong Kong Youth Radicalization from the Perspective of Relative Deprivation Łukasz Zamęcki* University of Warsaw Abstract The aim of this paper is to highlight the influence of relative deprivation (RD), observed amongst a number of Hongkongese youth, on the process of radicalization of Hong Kong politics. The thesis of this paper is that the political radicalization of youth, noticeable particularly in recent years (e.g. more violent protests, the growth of nativist and localist organizations and the flourishing idea of self-determination of Hong Kong), can be an effect of RD. The findings conclude that the feeling of deprivation amongst youth refers to two spheres: “political values” and “welfare values”. The former concern the expectations of democratization of the political system and the latter relate to the feeling of dismantling the economic status and cultural identity of Hongkongers. The results of this paper are based on a small-range qualitative research (focus groups, in-depth interviews) conducted in April 2014, November 2015 and September 2016 on the group of HK students, scholars, journalists, and politicians. The analysis leads to the conclusion that without real changes in the political system of Hong Kong, the level of radicalization might further increase in the coming years. 451 452 Łukasz Zamęcki Keywords: relative deprivation, political radicalization, contentious politics, Hong Kong politics 1. Introduction In recent years, one could observe more transgressive instruments of manifestation of own political ideas by the young citizens of Hong Kong.
    [Show full text]