Regulation of Mrna Translation by Human Cytomegalovirus Ptrs1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Regulation of Mrna Translation by Human Cytomegalovirus Ptrs1 REGULATION OF MRNA TRANSLATION BY HUMAN CYTOMEGALOVIRUS PTRS1 Heather Ashley Vincent A dissertation submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Microbiology and Immunology in the School of Medicine. Chapel Hill 2017 Approved by: Nathaniel Moorman Mark Heise Marty Ferris Stanley Lemon Bill Marzluff Cary Moody © 2017 Heather Ashley Vincent ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Heather Ashley Vincent: Regulation of mRNA Translation by Human Cytomegalovirus pTRS1 (Under the direction of Nathaniel Moorman) Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is a major public health burden. Acute infection during pregnancy can lead to congenital birth defects, and reactivation of a latent infection in immune compromised individuals can cause significant morbidity and mortality. HCMV does not encode its own ribosomes, and is therefore completely reliant on the host translation machinery for viral protein synthesis. HCMV also does not induce host translational shutoff upon infection, thus viral mRNAs must compete with cellular mRNAs to efficiently translate viral proteins. The HCMV protein TRS1 (pTRS1) plays an integral role in translation regulation during HCMV replication by antagonizing the antiviral kinase PKR. Activated PKR phosphorylates eIF2α, which causes an overall inhibition of protein synthesis that inhibits HCMV replication. pTRS1 also increases overall levels of protein synthesis and enhances the translation of reporter mRNAs in a PKR-independent manner, showing that pTRS1 regulates mRNA translation through multiple mechanisms. In this dissertation I sought to define the mechanisms used by pTRS1 to stimulate translation. In chapter 1 I show that pTRS1 inhibits PKR activation by binding to PKR and inhibiting PKR kinase activity. pTRS1 binds PKR residues that are conserved across eIF2α kinases, suggesting that pTRS1 can antagonize multiple eIF2α kinases. In chapter 2 I show that pTRS1 stimulates cap-independent translation. iii pTRS1 enhances the activity of both host and viral internal ribosome entry sites (IRESs) and stimulates translation of a circular mRNA reporter. These pTRS1 functions were independent of its ability to antagonize PKR, but dependent on its ability to bind double- stranded RNA. To understand how pTRS1 stimulates translation, in chapter 4 I identify ribosome-associated, cellular proteins that bind pTRS1. I found that pTRS1 interacts with active protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) catalytic subunits. Rather than affect PP1 catalytic activity, pTRS1 changes the complement of proteins that interact with the PP1 alpha catalytic subunit, possibly to regulate PP1 substrate specificity. Together these data further characterize the mechanisms used by pTRS1 to regulate mRNA translation and reveal how pTRS1 may contribute to the efficient translation of viral mRNAs during HCMV infection. iv To my little man. Your smiling face brightens even the roughest days. v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I first want to thank my family for their continued love and support. You have supported me in every step of my journey to becoming a scientist and I am eternally grateful for that. I also want to thank my friends for keeping me sane during my time in graduate school. This was not an easy process, but you were always there for me. I could not have made it without you. I cannot express how grateful I am to have worked with such a wonderful group of people in the Moorman lab. You guys are amazing, and became like family. Thank you for your support and friendship throughout the years. Lastly, none of this would have been possible without the incredible mentorship I received from Nathaniel Moorman. You taught me how to think, and very importantly, to always include proper controls. I am so grateful for the time and effort you put into training me. I am the scientist I am today because of you. Thank you. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................ xi LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................... xii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS ................................................................. xiv CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................ 1 Herpesvirus replication and pathogenesis ............................................................ 1 Human cytomegalovirus pathogenesis ................................................................. 5 Human cytomegalovirus replication ...................................................................... 8 Regulation of mRNA translation during HCMV infection ....................................... 9 Overview of translation regulation ....................................................................... 10 Overview of translation regulation during HCMV infection .................................. 18 The role of the eIF4F complex in HCMV replication ........................................... 19 Alternate modes of translation initiation during infection ..................................... 21 HCMV and eIF2α kinases ................................................................................... 23 Role for HCMV pTRS1 in translation regulation .................................................. 27 Outstanding questions in the field ....................................................................... 31 Figure .................................................................................................................. 35 References .......................................................................................................... 37 CHAPTER 2: MECHANISM OF PKR INHIBITION BY HCMV PTRS1 ........................... 66 Overview ............................................................................................................. 66 vii Introduction ......................................................................................................... 67 Materials and Methods ........................................................................................ 70 Results ................................................................................................................ 77 Discussion ........................................................................................................... 85 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................. 90 Figures ................................................................................................................ 91 Tables.................................................................................................................. 98 References ........................................................................................................ 104 CHAPTER 3: HUMAN CYTOMEGALOVIRUS PTRS1 STIMULATES CAP- INDEPENDENT TRANSLATION ...................................................................... 111 Overview ........................................................................................................... 111 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 112 Materials and Methods ...................................................................................... 115 Results .............................................................................................................. 118 Discussion ......................................................................................................... 123 Acknowledgements ........................................................................................... 125 Figures .............................................................................................................. 126 Tables................................................................................................................ 131 References ........................................................................................................ 132 CHAPTER 4: HCMV PTRS1 INTERACTS WITH ACTIVE PP1 CATALYTIC SUBUNITS ................................................................................... 139 Overview ........................................................................................................... 139 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 140 Materials and Methods ...................................................................................... 142 viii Results .............................................................................................................. 149 Discussion ......................................................................................................... 154 Figures .............................................................................................................. 158 Tables................................................................................................................ 164 References ........................................................................................................ 165 CHAPTER 5: DISCUSSION ......................................................................................... 170 Summary of my findings .................................................................................... 170 Outstanding questions
Recommended publications
  • Repositório Da Universidade De Lisboa
    UNIVERSIDADE DE LISBOA FACULDADE DE CIÊNCIAS DEPARTAMENTO DE BIOLOGIA ANIMAL TOWARDS THE IDENTIFICATION OF BIOMARKERS FOR CYSTIC FIBROSIS BY PROTEOMICS NUNO MIGUEL ANTUNES GARCIA CHARRO DOUTORAMENTO EM BIOLOGIA ESPECIALIDADE BIOLOGIA MOLECULAR 2011 ii iii iv UNIVERSIDADE DE LISBOA FACULDADE DE CIÊNCIAS DEPARTAMENTO DE BIOLOGIA ANIMAL TOWARDS THE IDENTIFICATION OF BIOMARKERS FOR CYSTIC FIBROSIS BY PROTEOMICS Tese orientada pela Doutora Deborah Penque e Professora Doutora Ana Maria Viegas Gonçalves Crespo NUNO MIGUEL ANTUNES GARCIA CHARRO DOUTORAMENTO EM BIOLOGIA (BIOLOGIA MOLECULAR) 2011 v The research described in this thesis was conducted at Laboratório de Proteómica, Departamento de Genética, Instituto Nacional de Saúde Dr. Ricardo Jorge (INSA, I.P.), Lisbon, Portugal; Clinical Proteomics Facility, University of Pittsburgh Medical Centre, Pennsylvania, USA; and Laboratory of Proteomics and Analytical Technologies, National Cancer Institute at Frederick, Maryland, USA. Work partially supported by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT), Fundo Europeu para o Desenvolvimento (FEDER) (POCI/SAU-MMO/56163/2004), FCT/Poly-Annual Funding Program and FEDER/Saúde XXI Program (Portugal). Nuno Charro is a recipient of FCT doctoral fellowship (SFRH/BD/27906/2006). vi Agradecimentos/Acknowledgements “Nothing is hidden that will not be made known; Nothing is secret that will not come to light” Desde muito pequeno, a minha vontade em querer saber mais e porquê foi sempre presença constante. Ao iniciar e no decorrer da minha (ainda) curta na investigação científica, as perguntas foram mudando, o método também e várias pessoas contribuíram para o crescimento e desenvolvimento da minha personalidade científica e pessoal. Espero não me esquecer de ninguém e, se o fizer, não é intencional; apenas falibilidade.
    [Show full text]
  • Associated 16P11.2 Deletion in Drosophila Melanogaster
    ARTICLE DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-04882-6 OPEN Pervasive genetic interactions modulate neurodevelopmental defects of the autism- associated 16p11.2 deletion in Drosophila melanogaster Janani Iyer1, Mayanglambam Dhruba Singh1, Matthew Jensen1,2, Payal Patel 1, Lucilla Pizzo1, Emily Huber1, Haley Koerselman3, Alexis T. Weiner 1, Paola Lepanto4, Komal Vadodaria1, Alexis Kubina1, Qingyu Wang 1,2, Abigail Talbert1, Sneha Yennawar1, Jose Badano 4, J. Robert Manak3,5, Melissa M. Rolls1, Arjun Krishnan6,7 & 1234567890():,; Santhosh Girirajan 1,2,8 As opposed to syndromic CNVs caused by single genes, extensive phenotypic heterogeneity in variably-expressive CNVs complicates disease gene discovery and functional evaluation. Here, we propose a complex interaction model for pathogenicity of the autism-associated 16p11.2 deletion, where CNV genes interact with each other in conserved pathways to modulate expression of the phenotype. Using multiple quantitative methods in Drosophila RNAi lines, we identify a range of neurodevelopmental phenotypes for knockdown of indi- vidual 16p11.2 homologs in different tissues. We test 565 pairwise knockdowns in the developing eye, and identify 24 interactions between pairs of 16p11.2 homologs and 46 interactions between 16p11.2 homologs and neurodevelopmental genes that suppress or enhance cell proliferation phenotypes compared to one-hit knockdowns. These interac- tions within cell proliferation pathways are also enriched in a human brain-specific network, providing translational relevance in humans. Our study indicates a role for pervasive genetic interactions within CNVs towards cellular and developmental phenotypes. 1 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA. 2 Bioinformatics and Genomics Program, The Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 2 (Cdk2) Controls Phosphatase-Regulated Signaling and Function in Platelets
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.31.126953; this version posted June 28, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (Cdk2) controls phosphatase-regulated signaling and function in platelets Paul R. Woods, Jr.,1,2 Brian L. Hood5, Sruti Shiva,$4 Thomas P. Conrads5, Sarah Suchko,2 Richard Steinman, 1,2,4# Departments oF Medicine1, Hillman Cancer Center2, Vascular Medicine Institute3, Department oF Molecular Pharmacology and Chemical Biology4, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; The Henry M. Jackson Foundation For the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Inova Women’s Service Line, Inova Health System5 #Corresponding author: Richard Steinman, MD, PhD Associate Professor of Medicine and Pharmacology Associate Dean, Director Medical Scientist Training Program Director, Physician Scientist Training Program University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine 2.26f Hillman Cancer Center 5117 Centre Avenue Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA phone: 412 6233237 fax: 412 6234840 [email protected] bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.31.126953; this version posted June 28, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Abstract Cell cycle regulatory molecules including cyclin-dependent kinases can be recruited into non-nuclear pathways to coordinate cell cycling with the energetic state oF the cell or with Functions such as motility.
    [Show full text]
  • SHOC2–MRAS–PP1 Complex Positively Regulates RAF Activity and Contributes to Noonan Syndrome Pathogenesis
    SHOC2–MRAS–PP1 complex positively regulates RAF activity and contributes to Noonan syndrome pathogenesis Lucy C. Younga,1, Nicole Hartiga,2, Isabel Boned del Ríoa, Sibel Saria, Benjamin Ringham-Terrya, Joshua R. Wainwrighta, Greg G. Jonesa, Frank McCormickb,3, and Pablo Rodriguez-Vicianaa,3 aUniversity College London Cancer Institute, University College London, London WC1E 6DD, United Kingdom; and bHelen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158 Contributed by Frank McCormick, September 18, 2018 (sent for review November 22, 2017; reviewed by Deborah K. Morrison and Marc Therrien) Dephosphorylation of the inhibitory “S259” site on RAF kinases CRAF/RAF1 mutations are also frequently found in NS and (S259 on CRAF, S365 on BRAF) plays a key role in RAF activation. cluster around the S259 14-3-3 binding site, enhancing CRAF ac- The MRAS GTPase, a close relative of RAS oncoproteins, interacts tivity through disruption of 14-3-3 binding (8) and highlighting the with SHOC2 and protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) to form a heterotri- key role of this regulatory step in RAF–ERK pathway activation. meric holoenzyme that dephosphorylates this S259 RAF site. MRAS is a very close relative of the classical RAS oncoproteins MRAS and SHOC2 function as PP1 regulatory subunits providing (H-, N-, and KRAS, hereafter referred to collectively as “RAS”) the complex with striking specificity against RAF. MRAS also func- and shares most regulatory and effector interactions as well as tions as a targeting subunit as membrane localization is required transforming ability (9–11). However, MRAS also has specific for efficient RAF dephosphorylation and ERK pathway regulation functions of its own, and uniquely among RAS family GTPases, it in cells.
    [Show full text]
  • Pig Antibodies
    Pig Antibodies gene_name sku Entry_Name Protein_Names Organism Length Identity CDX‐2 ARP31476_P050 D0V4H7_PIG Caudal type homeobox 2 (Fragment) Sus scrofa (Pig) 147 100.00% CDX‐2 ARP31476_P050 A7MAE3_PIG Caudal type homeobox transcription factor 2 (Fragment) Sus scrofa (Pig) 75 100.00% Tnnt3 ARP51286_P050 Q75NH3_PIG Troponin T fast skeletal muscle type Sus scrofa (Pig) 271 85.00% Tnnt3 ARP51286_P050 Q75NH2_PIG Troponin T fast skeletal muscle type Sus scrofa (Pig) 266 85.00% Tnnt3 ARP51286_P050 Q75NH1_PIG Troponin T fast skeletal muscle type Sus scrofa (Pig) 260 85.00% Tnnt3 ARP51286_P050 Q75NH0_PIG Troponin T fast skeletal muscle type Sus scrofa (Pig) 250 85.00% Tnnt3 ARP51286_P050 Q75NG8_PIG Troponin T fast skeletal muscle type Sus scrofa (Pig) 266 85.00% Tnnt3 ARP51286_P050 Q75NG7_PIG Troponin T fast skeletal muscle type Sus scrofa (Pig) 260 85.00% Tnnt3 ARP51286_P050 Q75NG6_PIG Troponin T fast skeletal muscle type Sus scrofa (Pig) 250 85.00% Tnnt3 ARP51286_P050 TNNT3_PIG Troponin T, fast skeletal muscle (TnTf) Sus scrofa (Pig) 271 85.00% ORF Names:PANDA_000462 EMBL EFB13877.1OrganismAiluropod High mobility group protein B2 (High mobility group protein a melanoleuca (Giant panda) ARP31939_P050 HMGB2_PIG 2) (HMG‐2) Sus scrofa (Pig) 210 100.00% Agpat5 ARP47429_P050 B8XTR3_PIG 1‐acylglycerol‐3‐phosphate O‐acyltransferase 5 Sus scrofa (Pig) 365 85.00% irf9 ARP31200_P050 Q29390_PIG Transcriptional regulator ISGF3 gamma subunit (Fragment) Sus scrofa (Pig) 57 100.00% irf9 ARP31200_P050 Q0GFA1_PIG Interferon regulatory factor 9 Sus scrofa (Pig)
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Table 2
    Supplementary Table 2. Differentially Expressed Genes following Sham treatment relative to Untreated Controls Fold Change Accession Name Symbol 3 h 12 h NM_013121 CD28 antigen Cd28 12.82 BG665360 FMS-like tyrosine kinase 1 Flt1 9.63 NM_012701 Adrenergic receptor, beta 1 Adrb1 8.24 0.46 U20796 Nuclear receptor subfamily 1, group D, member 2 Nr1d2 7.22 NM_017116 Calpain 2 Capn2 6.41 BE097282 Guanine nucleotide binding protein, alpha 12 Gna12 6.21 NM_053328 Basic helix-loop-helix domain containing, class B2 Bhlhb2 5.79 NM_053831 Guanylate cyclase 2f Gucy2f 5.71 AW251703 Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 12a Tnfrsf12a 5.57 NM_021691 Twist homolog 2 (Drosophila) Twist2 5.42 NM_133550 Fc receptor, IgE, low affinity II, alpha polypeptide Fcer2a 4.93 NM_031120 Signal sequence receptor, gamma Ssr3 4.84 NM_053544 Secreted frizzled-related protein 4 Sfrp4 4.73 NM_053910 Pleckstrin homology, Sec7 and coiled/coil domains 1 Pscd1 4.69 BE113233 Suppressor of cytokine signaling 2 Socs2 4.68 NM_053949 Potassium voltage-gated channel, subfamily H (eag- Kcnh2 4.60 related), member 2 NM_017305 Glutamate cysteine ligase, modifier subunit Gclm 4.59 NM_017309 Protein phospatase 3, regulatory subunit B, alpha Ppp3r1 4.54 isoform,type 1 NM_012765 5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin) receptor 2C Htr2c 4.46 NM_017218 V-erb-b2 erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homolog Erbb3 4.42 3 (avian) AW918369 Zinc finger protein 191 Zfp191 4.38 NM_031034 Guanine nucleotide binding protein, alpha 12 Gna12 4.38 NM_017020 Interleukin 6 receptor Il6r 4.37 AJ002942
    [Show full text]
  • Allelic Deletions on Chromosome 11Q13 in Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1- Associated and Sporadic Gastrinomas and Pancreatic Endocrine Tumors
    ICANCERRESEARCH57.2238—2243.June1. 19971 Allelic Deletions on Chromosome 11q13 in Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1- associated and Sporadic Gastrinomas and Pancreatic Endocrine Tumors Larisa V. Debelenko, Zhengping Zhuang, Michael R. Emmert-Buck, Settara C. Chandrasekharappa, Pachiappan Manickam, Siradanahalli C. Guru, Stephen J. Marx, Monica C. Skarulis, Allen M. Spiegel, Francis S. Collins, Robert T. Jensen, Lance A. Liotta, and Irma A. Lubensky' Laboratory of Pathology, National Cancer institute IL V. D., 1 1, M. R. E-B., L A. L, i. A. LI, National Centerfor Human Genome Research [S. C. C., P. M., S. C. G., F. S. C.], and Branches of Metabolic Diseases (S. J. M., A. M. S.], Diabetes [M. C. S.), and Digestive Diseases [R. T. ii, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, N/H. Bethesda, Maryland 20892 ABSTRACT MEN] is a tumor suppressor gene (9—11).MEN1 patients are hypoth esized to inherit a mutation in one copy of the gene, and susceptible Endocrine tumors (ETs) of pancreas and duodenum occur sporadically cells in the target organs are transformed through the inactivation of and as a part of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1). The MENJ the wild-type copy of the gene, potentially occurring via point muta tumor suppressor gene has been localized to chromosome 11q13 by link age analysis but has not yet isolated. Previous alleic deletion studies in tions, deletions, or gene methylation (6, 7, 10, 11). Sporadic parathy enteropancreatic ETs suggested MENJ gene involvement in tumorigenesis roid and enteropancreatic ETs have also been described to exhibit of familial pancreatic ETs (nongastrinomas) and sporadic gastrinomas.
    [Show full text]
  • A PP1-Binding Motif Present in BRCA1 Plays a Role in Its DNA Repair Function Young-Mi Yu1, Serena M
    Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2008, 4 352 International Journal of Biological Sciences ISSN 1449-2288 www.biolsci.org 2008 4(6):352-361 © Ivyspring International Publisher. All rights reserved Research Paper A PP1-binding motif present in BRCA1 plays a role in its DNA repair function Young-Mi Yu1, Serena M. Pace1, Susan R. Allen1, Chu-Xia Deng2 and Lih-Ching Hsu1,3 1. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, PA15213, USA 2. Genetics of Development and Diseases Branch, National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive, and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA 3. School of Pharmacy, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei 10051, Taiwan, ROC Correspondence to: Dr. Lih-Ching Hsu, School of Pharmacy, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, 12F, No 1, Section 1, Jen-Ai Road, Taipei 10051, Taiwan. Phone: +886-2-2312-3456 ext. 88400; Fax: +886-2-2391-9098; E-mail: [email protected] Received: 2008.09.30; Accepted: 2008.10.04; Published: 2008.10.04 Protein phosphatase 1α (PP1α) regulates phosphorylation of BRCA1, which contains a PP1-binding motif 898KVTF901. Mutation of this motif greatly reduces the interaction between BRCA1 and PP1α. Here we show that mutation of the PP1-binding motif abolishes the ability of BRCA1 to enhance survival of Brca1-deficient mouse mammary tumor cells after DNA damage. The Rad51 focus formation and comet assays revealed that the DNA repair function of BRCA1 was impaired when the PP1-binding motif was mutated. Analysis of subnuclear localization of GFP-tagged BRCA1 demonstrated that mutation of the PP1-binding motif affected BRCA1 redistribution in response to DNA damage.
    [Show full text]
  • Coordinated Downregulation of Spinophilin and the Catalytic Subunits of PP1, PPP1CA/B/C, Contributes to a Worse Prognosis in Lung Cancer
    www.impactjournals.com/oncotarget/ Oncotarget, 2017, Vol. 8, (No. 62), pp: 105196-105210 Research Paper Coordinated downregulation of Spinophilin and the catalytic subunits of PP1, PPP1CA/B/C, contributes to a worse prognosis in lung cancer Eva M. Verdugo-Sivianes1,2, Lola Navas1,2, Sonia Molina-Pinelo1,2, Irene Ferrer2,3, Alvaro Quintanal-Villalonga3, Javier Peinado1,4, Jose M. Garcia-Heredia1,2,5, Blanca Felipe-Abrio1,2, Sandra Muñoz-Galvan1,2, Juan J. Marin1,2,6, Luis Montuenga2,7, Luis Paz-Ares2,3 and Amancio Carnero1,2 1Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBIS), Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Universidad de Sevilla, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Sevilla, Spain 2CIBER de Cáncer, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Pabellón 11, Planta 0, Madrid, Spain 3H120-CNIO Lung Cancer Clinical Research Unit, Instituto de Investigación Hospital 12 de Octubre and CNIO, Madrid, Spain 4Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain 5Department of Vegetal Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Seville, Seville, Spain 6Department of Predictive Medicine and Public Health, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain 7Program in Solid Tumors and Biomarkers, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), Pamplona, Spain Correspondence to: Amancio Carnero, email: [email protected] Keywords: Spinophilin; PP1; biomarker; lung cancer; therapy Received: May 13, 2017 Accepted: September 03, 2017 Published: October 26, 2017 Copyright: Verdugo-Sivianes et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
    [Show full text]
  • Alterations of the Pro-Survival Bcl-2 Protein Interactome in Breast Cancer
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/695379; this version posted July 12, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Alterations of the pro-survival Bcl-2 protein interactome in 2 breast cancer at the transcriptional, mutational and 3 structural level 4 5 Simon Mathis Kønig1, Vendela Rissler1, Thilde Terkelsen1, Matteo Lambrughi1, Elena 6 Papaleo1,2 * 7 1Computational Biology Laboratory, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, 8 Strandboulevarden 49, 2100, Copenhagen 9 10 2Translational Disease Systems Biology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Novo 11 Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, 12 Denmark 13 14 Abstract 15 16 Apoptosis is an essential defensive mechanism against tumorigenesis. Proteins of the B-cell 17 lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2) family regulates programmed cell death by the mitochondrial apoptosis 18 pathway. In response to intracellular stresses, the apoptotic balance is governed by interactions 19 of three distinct subgroups of proteins; the activator/sensitizer BH3 (Bcl-2 homology 3)-only 20 proteins, the pro-survival, and the pro-apoptotic executioner proteins. Changes in expression 21 levels, stability, and functional impairment of pro-survival proteins can lead to an imbalance 22 in tissue homeostasis. Their overexpression or hyperactivation can result in oncogenic effects. 23 Pro-survival Bcl-2 family members carry out their function by binding the BH3 short linear 24 motif of pro-apoptotic proteins in a modular way, creating a complex network of protein- 25 protein interactions.
    [Show full text]
  • Anticancer Effects of Β-Elemene in Gastric Cancer Cells and Its Potential Underlying Proteins: a Proteomic Study
    ONCOLOGY REPORTS 32: 2635-2647, 2014 Anticancer effects of β-elemene in gastric cancer cells and its potential underlying proteins: A proteomic study JUN-SONG LIU, SHI-CAI HE, ZHENG-LIANG ZHANG, RUI CHEN, LIN FAN, GUANG-LIN QIU, SHUAI CHANG, LIANG LI and XIANG-MING CHE Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Medical College of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, P.R. China Received July 4, 2014; Accepted August 26, 2014 DOI: 10.3892/or.2014.3490 Abstract. Gastric cancer is a common malignancy with a Introduction poor prognosis. β-elemene is a broad-spectrum anticancer drug extracted from the traditional Chinese medicinal herb Gastric cancer is the fourth most common malignancy in Curcuma wenyujin. In the present study, we investigated the the world and the second leading cause of cancer-related anticancer effects of β-elemene in gastric cancer cells and the mortality (1). At present, surgical resection remains the potential proteins involved. Human SGC7901 and MKN45 main therapeutic strategy for gastric cancer, supplemented gastric cancer cells were treated with different concentrations with perioperative chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy and/or of β-elemene. Cell viability, clonogenic survival and apoptotic immunotherapy (2-5). However, most patients are diagnosed cell death were assessed. β-elemene inhibited viability and with advanced gastric cancer which may have progressed decreased clonogenic survival of gastric cancer cells in a beyond the curative potential of surgical operation (6,7). In dose-dependent manner. Apoptosis induction contributed to addition, previous studies have demonstrated that a consid- the anticancer effects. We then employed a proteomic method, erable proportion of patients receiving potentially curative isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ), to resection experienced recurrences which lead to unfavorable detect the proteins altered by β-elemene.
    [Show full text]
  • Role of the Holoenzyme PP1-SPN in the Dephosphorylation of the RB Family of Tumor Suppressors During Cell Cycle
    cancers Review Role of the Holoenzyme PP1-SPN in the Dephosphorylation of the RB Family of Tumor Suppressors During Cell Cycle Eva M. Verdugo-Sivianes 1,2 and Amancio Carnero 1,2,* 1 Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, IBIS, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Universidad de Sevilla, Avda. Manuel Siurot s/n, 41013 Seville, Spain; [email protected] 2 CIBERONC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +34-955-92-31-11 Simple Summary: Cell cycle progression is highly regulated by modulating the phosphorylation status of retinoblastoma (RB) family proteins. This process is controlled by a balance in the action of kinases, such as the complexes formed by cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) and cyclins, and phosphatases, mainly the protein phosphatase 1 (PP1). However, while the phosphorylation of the RB family has been largely studied, its dephosphorylation is less known. Recently, the PP1-Spinophilin (SPN) holoenzyme has been described as the main phosphatase responsible for the dephosphorylation of RB proteins during the G0/G1 transition and at the end of G1. Here, we describe the regulation of the phosphorylation status of RB family proteins, giving importance not only to their inactivation by phosphorylation but also to their dephosphorylation to restore the cell cycle. Abstract: Cell cycle progression is highly regulated by modulating the phosphorylation status of Citation: Verdugo-Sivianes, E.M.; the retinoblastoma protein (pRB) and the other two members of the RB family, p107 and p130. This Carnero, A. Role of the Holoenzyme process is controlled by a balance in the action of kinases, such as the complexes formed by cyclin- PP1-SPN in the Dephosphorylation of dependent kinases (CDKs) and cyclins, and phosphatases, mainly the protein phosphatase 1 (PP1).
    [Show full text]