DOCSLIB.ORG

Response to Submissions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Response to Submissions Albany Iron Ore Project Albany Port Expansion Proposal PUBLIC ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW RESPONSE TO PUBLIC SUBMISSIONS Albany Port Authority Albany Port Expansion Proposal EPA Assessment No. 1594 August 2008 i Document Status Rev Author Reviewer/s Date Approved for Issue No. Name Distributed Date To 9 S. Dolbel P. Mackey 11/07/08 V Ee B Corry 11/07/08 V Ee P Mackey 10 T. Souster P. Mackey 01/08/08 G. Crockford 11 T. Souster ecologia Environment (2008). Reproduction of this report in whole or in part by electronic, mechanical or chemical means including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, in any language, is strictly prohibited without the express approval of Albany Port authority and/or ecologia Environment. Restrictions on Use This report has been prepared specifically for Albany Port Authority. Neither the report nor its contents may be referred to or quoted in any statement, study, report, application, prospectus, loan, or other agreement document, without the express approval of Albany Port Authority and/or ecologia Environment. ecologia Environment 1025 Wellington Street WEST PERTH WA 6005 Phone: 08 9322 1944 Fax: 08 9322 1599 Email: ecologia@ecologia.com.au ii Table of Contents 1.0 Responses to submissions ....................................................................................1 2.0 Stakeholder Engagement........................................................................................2 2.1 Compensation ...........................................................................................................3 3.0 Project Justification.................................................................................................5 4.0 Project Description..................................................................................................7 4.1 Project Timing............................................................................................................7 5.0 Environmental Offsets...........................................................................................10 6.0 The Project Environment and Potential Environmental Impacts and Management...........................................................................................................11 6.1 The Project Environment .........................................................................................11 6.2 Modelling .................................................................................................................16 6.3 Environmental Impacts ............................................................................................22 6.4 Sediment Chemistry ................................................................................................23 6.5 Benthic Primary Producer Habitat ...........................................................................26 6.5.1 BPPH Mapping.............................................................................................26 6.5.2 Seagrass......................................................................................................29 6.5.3 Coral.............................................................................................................33 6.6 Marine Fauna ..........................................................................................................38 6.7 Fisheries and Aquaculture.......................................................................................41 6.8 Terrestrial Fauna .....................................................................................................51 6.9 Noise and Vibration .................................................................................................51 6.10 Visual Amenity.........................................................................................................54 6.11 Air Quality Dust........................................................................................................57 6.12 Social and Cultural Environment .............................................................................57 6.13 Monitoring................................................................................................................59 6.14 Dredge Management...............................................................................................68 6.15 Evaluation of Disposal Sites ....................................................................................69 6.15.1 Disposal Site Stability...................................................................................69 6.15.2 Evaluation of Alternative Sites .....................................................................71 6.15.3 Disposal Site Epifauna and Infauna.............................................................72 7.0 Miscellaneous ........................................................................................................74 8.0 Figures....................................................................................................................77 9.0 Revised Dredge Program and Modelling Outputs ..............................................85 9.1 Dredge and Land Reclamation Program .................................................................85 9.1.1 Channel Design............................................................................................85 9.1.2 Dredging.......................................................................................................85 9.1.3 Land Reclamation ........................................................................................85 9.1.4 Offshore Disposal.........................................................................................85 9.2 New Information ......................................................................................................89 9.3 Remodelling of Turbidity Generation .......................................................................89 iii 9.3.1 For the Period July to October .....................................................................89 9.3.2 For the Period November to February .........................................................92 9.3.3 For the Period March to June.......................................................................95 9.4 Impacts to BPPH .....................................................................................................98 9.4.1 Berth Pocket Dredging.................................................................................98 9.4.2 Combined Berth Pocket and Channel Dredging ........................................102 10.0 References ...........................................................................................................107 Figures Figure 6-1: Cross section of Channel and Berth pocket.................................................44 Figure 6-2: Flat seabed without wave action..................................................................70 Figure 8-1: Drain option, concept B Berth Location........................................................78 Figure 8-2: Marine Habitat in the Albany area Identified as worthy of Consideration for Reserve (A Representative Marine Reserve System for Western Australia, CALM 1994).................................................................................................79 Figure 8-3: Habitat map of Princess Royal Harbour and King George Sound study area .....................................................................................................................80 Figure 8-4: Ground Truthing Locations for Habitat Mapping of Princess Royal Harbour and King George Sound study area.............................................................81 Figure 8-5: Satellite imagery of Habitat Mapping in Princess Royal Harbour and King George Sound study area............................................................................82 Figure 8-6: Chart 2619 “King George Sound” and “Princess Royal Harbour” (Corrected 6.7.1956)......................................................................................................83 Figure 8-7: Area with contaminated material suitable for unconfined offshore disposal in- line with NODGDM.......................................................................................84 Figure 9-1: Revised Channel Design Footprint ..............................................................86 Figure 9-2: Previous, Revised & Existing Channel Design Comparison ........................87 Figure 9-3: Previous vs Revised Land Reclamation and Berth Pocket Footprint...........88 Figure 9-4: CSD and TSHD Combined Campaign Turbidity Generation (July to October) .....................................................................................................................90 Figure 9-5: CSD Berth Pocket only Turbidity Generation (July to October) ...................91 Figure 9-6: CSD and TSHD Combined Campaign Turbidity Generation (November to February)......................................................................................................93 Figure 9-7: CSD Berth Pocket only Turbidity Generation (November to February) .......94 iv Figure 9-8: CSD and TSHD Combined Campaign Turbidity Generation (March to June) . .....................................................................................................................96 Figure 9-9: CSD Berth Pocket only Turbidity Generation (March to June).....................97 Figure 9-10: CSD Impact on Benthic Primary Producer Habitat of Princess Royal Harbour and King George Sound study
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Great Australian Bight BP Oil Drilling Project
    Submission to Senate Inquiry: Great Australian Bight BP Oil Drilling Project: Potential Impacts on Matters of National Environmental Significance within Modelled Oil Spill Impact Areas (Summer and Winter 2A Model Scenarios) Prepared by Dr David Ellis (BSc Hons PhD; Ecologist, Environmental Consultant and Founder at Stepping Stones Ecological Services) March 27, 2016 Table of Contents Table of Contents ..................................................................................................... 2 Executive Summary ................................................................................................ 4 Summer Oil Spill Scenario Key Findings ................................................................. 5 Winter Oil Spill Scenario Key Findings ................................................................... 7 Threatened Species Conservation Status Summary ........................................... 8 International Migratory Bird Agreements ............................................................. 8 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 11 Methods .................................................................................................................... 12 Protected Matters Search Tool Database Search and Criteria for Oil-Spill Model Selection ............................................................................................................. 12 Criteria for Inclusion/Exclusion of Threatened, Migratory and Marine
    [Show full text]
  • Albany Coast Draft Management Plan 2016
    Albany coast draft management plan 2016 Albany coast draft management plan 2016 Conservation Commission of Western Australia Department of Parks and Wildlife Department of Parks and Wildlife 17 Dick Perry Avenue KENSINGTON WA 6151 Phone: (08) 9219 9000 Fax: (08) 9334 0498 www.dpaw.wa.gov.au © State of Western Australia 2016 May 2016 This work is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in unaltered form (retaining this notice) for your personal, non-commercial use or use within your organisation. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, all other rights are reserved. Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Department of Parks and Wildlife. ISBN 978-1-921703-67-6 (print) ISBN 978-1-921703-68-3 (online) This management plan was prepared by the Conservation Commission of Western Australia through the agency of the Department of Parks and Wildlife. Questions regarding this management plan should be directed to: Planning Branch Department of Parks and Wildlife Locked Bag 104 Bentley Delivery Centre WA 6983 Phone: (08) 9219 9000 The recommended reference for this publication is: Department of Parks and Wildlife (2016) Albany coast draft management plan 2016. Department of Parks and Wildlife, Perth. This document is available in alternative formats on request. Please note: URLs in this document which conclude a sentence are followed by a full point. If copying the URL please do not include the full point. Front cover photos Main The new recreation facilities at The Gap in Torndirrup National Park. Photo – Parks and Wildlife Top left Gilbert’s potoroo or ngilgyte (Potorous gilberti).
    [Show full text]
  • South Coast Terrestrial and Marine Reserve Integration Study
    MARINE RESERVE IMPLEMENTATION SOUTH COAST SOUTH COAST TERRESTRIAL AND MARINE RESERVE INTEGRATION STUDY PROJECT #713 NATIONAL RESERVE SYSTEM COOPERATIVE PROGRAM Final Report: MRIP/SC-10/1997 A collaborative project between CALM Marine Conservation Branch and South Coast Region A project funded by Environment Australia Prepared by J G Colman Marine Conservation Branch March 1998 Marine Conservation Branch Department of Conservation and Land Management 47 Henry Street South Coast Terrestrial and Marine Reserve Integration Study Fremantle, Western Australia, 6160 ii South Coast Terrestrial and Marine Reserve Integration Study Research and the collation of information presented in this report was undertaken with funding provided by Environment Australia. The project was undertaken for the National Reserves System Cooperative Program (Project #713). The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the author and do not reflect those of the Commonwealth Government, the Minister for the Environment, or the Secretary, Environment Australia This report may be cited as South Coast Terrestrial and Marine Reserve Integration Study. Copies of the report may be borrowed from the library: Environment Australia Biodiversity Group GPO Box 636 CANBERRA ACT 2601 AUSTRALIA or The Librarian Science and Information Division Department of Conservation and Land Management PO Box 51 WANNEROO WA 6065 AUSTRALIA Cover - Bremer Bay and the Fitzgerald River National Park - Landsat TM imagery digitally enhanced by Satellite Remote Sensing Services, Department of Land Administration (DOLA), Western Australia. Satellite data provided from the Australian Coastal Atlas by ACRES. iii South Coast Terrestrial and Marine Reserve Integration Study EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Currently, there are no marine conservation reserves along the south coast of Western Australia, although most of the coastal terrestrial reserves contain marine areas between high and low water marks.
    [Show full text]
  • Fauna Assessment
    Fauna Assessment Lots 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10 & 11 Doyle Place Margaret River FEBRUARY 2017 Version 2 On behalf of: Halsall and Associates PO Box 29 MARGARET RIVER WA 6285 T: (08) 9758 8676 E: admin@halsall.net.au Prepared by: Greg Harewood Zoologist PO Box 755 BUNBURY WA 6231 M: 0402 141 197 E: gharewood@iinet.net.au LOTS 4, 5, & 7 - 11 - DOYLE PLACE - MARGARET RIVER – FAUNA ASSESSMENT – FEBRUARY 2017 – V2 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 1 2. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL ...................................................................................... 1 3. SCOPE OF WORKS ..................................................................................................... 1 4. METHODS .................................................................................................................... 2 4.1 POTENTIAL FAUNA INVENTORY – LITERATURE REVIEW ..................................... 2 4.1.1 Database Searches ............................................................................................. 2 4.1.2 Previous Fauna Surveys in the Area ................................................................... 2 4.1.3 Existing Publications ........................................................................................... 4 4.1.4 Fauna of Conservation Significance ................................................................... 5 4.1.5 Invertebrate Fauna of Conservation Significance ..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • By Ian Abbott Zoology Depaxtnent, University of Western Australia
    WESTERNAUSTRALIAN HERBARIUM RESEARCH NOTES No. 5, 1981: 5-18 VEGETATIONMAPS OF FOUR LARGE ISLANDS NEAR ALBANY, WESTERNAUSTRALIA By Ian Abbott ZooLogy Depaxtnent, University of Western Australia, Nedlands l1I.A.6009 . (Present address: Institute of Forest Researchand Protection. HaymanRoad, ComoW.A. 6152) ABSTRACT Vegetation maps otd coftn'nentay,Aane prouided fot, the fout: Lctrgest islands ( BaLd, Ecli,ps e, Breaksea, Miclnelnas ) neaz. Albang, Westewt Australia. The unLts nopped uez'e recognized by a mi.nture of strucku,al c*td florLsti,c ctitez"La. The nutnber of units napped ronged fz,omfour, (EcLipse f,) to ntne (Breaksea I.). Vegetati,on strLtctur.e cmd flor"Lstics of each island az,e dLscussed brLeflg in the contert of erposuz,e to saLt-bea?ing uindB, geoLogg, and nestirq s eabi.r'ds. It i,s axgued tLmt descrLption of the uegetati,on of Laz,ge islands of the Soul;h-ueatewl artd southern coastLi,nes of Ausl;y,aLia Lns intportont scientific uaLue. These isLands pr.ouide a baseLine ufuLeh eould aid undeystandLng of the Long temn effects of AborLgirnl fi.r"Lng on the uegetation of tLrc mainLand coast. INTRODUCTION Bald, Eclipse, Breaksea and lr{ichael.nasIslands, although only four of the 300 islands near the southern coastline of Western Austlcalia, are arnongstthe largest, They differ markedly in vegetation because of differences in area, naxinum elevation, distance from the mainland and degree of exposure and orientation to the swel1 (coning from the southwest) The purpose of this paper is to provide vegetation maps with detailed comnentaries for the four islands. Short descriptions of the vegetation present on snallelc islands near Albany are supplied, and brief conparisons are rnadebetween the vegetation present on islands and on peninsulas and headlands on the adj acent nainland.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Days Index
    Early Days Subject Index Volumes 1-13 Additions from Vols 10-13 are in blue Early Day's General Subject Index Subject Volume, Part and Page A Abandonment of the Colony 3.2.27; 3.5.12 Abbett, W.W. 3.6.35 ABBOTT Capt. 3.1.11 Mary 1.3.9 Mr., Northern Territory 3.2.48 V. 4.2.53,55 Abby Family 10.49 A.B.C. Offices 3.8.27-8; 7.7.IFC; 9.4.71-3 Abcott, Capt. 1.9.69 Abdullah, Mr. 9.1.67 ABERDEEN House, Albany 5.4.40,45,47 Dr. K. McK. 7.1.74 ABORIGINAL PEOPLE AND TOPICS 9.4.57 A group of Swan River Natives (Sketch) 13.591 Act of 1905 10.87; 10.85; 11.460 Affairs Dept 11.459 Albany 2.19.19,40 Albert 8.4.11 and legal system 13.317 and Swan River 13.372,375 Armstrong, with 2.19.27 Arrival in the Kimberley 13.53-58 Attacks 10.30; 11.596 Axes 3.5.34-5 Baby Stones 3.5.38 Bardoc Tribesmen 2.13.32 Barrabong 2.19.39 Battle of Pinjarra 1.1.24-37; 1.5.17-9; 2.19.27; 3.5.14; 5.8.11; 13.592 Bibbulmun 1.1.24 Biljagoro, Salvado's friend 3.9.27-8,34 Boab nut carving 12.697-715 Bolya 3.9.30-2 Boomerangs 3.5.35 Boongaree 2.19.2 Brass Band 3.9.34; 5.8.64 Bunbury 1.1.48,52; 3.3.27; 8.1.60 Page 1 of 476 Subject Volume, Part and Page Calyoot 1.8.72 Cannibals 5.8.21-3 Carlunga 4.1.46 Carnac Prison 2.19.18; 3.5.14 Charlie 2.19,45; 3.9.21 Children 11.189-90; 11.387-88 Christmas Island 5.4.15 Clothing 2.19.7; 9.6.34 Commissions of Inquiry 2.17.13; 2.19.42-5 Convicted, 1862-92 6.5.81 Cooking 10.324-28 Corroborees 1.1.7; 1.8.10; 1.9.16-7,70; 1.10.11; 2.19.20,24,29-32; 3.1.13; 3.9.30- 110.599 Coyle, Wiluna 4.2.55-7 Cricket Team 3.6.19; 3.9.34; 12.431 Cultural Foundation 13.686
    [Show full text]
  • A Representative Marine Reserve System for Western
    I I r t I I E I n I I T I I I E T I I REPORT OF THE MITRINE PARKS AND RESERVES SELECTION WORKING GROUP I PUBLISHED BY THE DEPARTMENT oF I qONSERVATIoN AND LAND MANAGEMENT I JUNE 1994 I I I I I I A REPRESENTATIVEMARINE I RESERVESYSTEM FOR WESTERN I AUSTRATIA I T I I I T I I I T REPORTOF THE MARINE PARKS AND RESERVESSELECTION I WORKINGGROUP Publishedby the Department of Conservation r and Land Management t luNE1994 I I I I I I Thisreport prepared by the Marine Park andReserves Selection Woyking Group for theHon Kevin MinsonML,A, Western Australian Minister for theEnvironment, is publishedon behalfof the t WorkingGroup by the Department of Conservationand Land Management. Thevaluable contribution made by the Chairman and mernbers ofthe Working Group, over a I numberofyears, is gratefullyacknowledged, asis thefinancial assistance towards the work of the WorkingGroup, in recentyears, from the Commonwealth Government through the Ocean Rescue 2000Program. T Theviews expressed in this reportare those of theWorking Group, and are not necessarilythe views of theWestern Australian Department of Conservationand Iand Management, the Western I AustralianMinister for theEnvironment, or theCommonwealth Government. I I I fu*AL'-4- I SydShea t ETCUTIIv'EDIRECTOR DEPARTMENTOF CONSERVATIONAND 1.4NDMANACEMENT I t I I I I I I r MAKINGA SUBMISSION r Wewant to knowwhat you think of theproposals in this reporl haveyou thought of writinga submission? I WHY WRITEA SUBMISSION? It is an opportunityto provideinformation, express your opinion, suggest alternatives and have a say I on howwe are proposing to developthe marine reserve system in WesternAustnlia.
    [Show full text]
  • Albany Coast Draft Management Plan 2014
    Albany coast draft management plan 2016 Albany coast draft management plan 2016 Conservation Commission of Western Australia Department of Parks and Wildlife Department of Parks and Wildlife 17 Dick Perry Avenue KENSINGTON WA 6151 Phone: (08) 9219 9000 Fax: (08) 9334 0498 www.dpaw.wa.gov.au © State of Western Australia 2016 May 2016 This work is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in unaltered form (retaining this notice) for your personal, non-commercial use or use within your organisation. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, all other rights are reserved. Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Department of Parks and Wildlife. ISBN 978-1-921703-67-6 (print) ISBN 978-1-921703-68-3 (online) This management plan was prepared by the Conservation Commission of Western Australia through the agency of the Department of Parks and Wildlife. Questions regarding this management plan should be directed to: Planning Branch Department of Parks and Wildlife Locked Bag 104 Bentley Delivery Centre WA 6983 Phone: (08) 9219 9000 The recommended reference for this publication is: Department of Parks and Wildlife (2016) Albany coast draft management plan 2016. Department of Parks and Wildlife, Perth. This document is available in alternative formats on request. Please note: URLs in this document which conclude a sentence are followed by a full point. If copying the URL please do not include the full point. Front cover photos Main The new recreation facilities at The Gap in Torndirrup National Park. Photo – Parks and Wildlife Top left Gilbert’s potoroo or ngilgyte (Potorous gilberti).
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Records of Australia
    LOCKYER TO MACLEAY. 471 Sunday, 14th.—At eleven o'clock ordered the Prisoners to be assem- 1827. bled for muster and inspection in general; found them very decent 22 Jan- and clean; ordered the Indulgence of Tea, Sugar and Tobacco to be Journai 0f disallowed to John Ryan, one of the sawyers for the next week, E. Lockyer. for gross insolence and general misconduct; the natives have not been Generai seen today; ordered the Prisoners not to go further than half a mile transactions. from the Camp, and on no pretence to go into the plain at the back of the Hill without orders and their names to be called'every four hours on Sunday. Therm, at noon 75. Monday, 15th.—A Party at work in the Garden and others col­ lecting Wood, etc., for additional Huts for the use of the Officers, etc., of the settlement. Yesterday was counted twelve large smokes or fires at the back of the encampment about two miles apart, forming a complete semicircle; what the motive was for it cannot be known, but from so many fires there must be assembled a number of the Natives. The wind has been very unpleasant, blowing hard from the westward, covers everything in the Tent with dust and sand. Therm, at noon 76. Tuesday, 16th.—People employed as yesterday a,t the Garden and collecting Materials for Huts and clearing ground, the stores being- all landed, and having no further cause for detaining the Brig than will be necessary to make the required reports for His Excellency's Proposed sailing information of the Progress made in the settlement, etc., Lieut, of bug Amity.
    [Show full text]
  • Status Performance Assessment: Biodiversity Conservation on Western Australian Islands Phase 1
    CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA STATUS PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT: BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION ON WESTERN AUSTRALIAN ISLANDS PHASE 1 Conservation Commission performance assessments are undertaken primarily to fulfil the functions described in S 19(g) of the Conservation and Land Management Act 1984. That is to “assess and audit the performance of the Department and the Forest Products Commission in carrying out and complying with the management plans”. They will also help inform its policy development function and its responsibility to advise the Minister on conservation and management of biodiversity components throughout the State. This performance assessment was undertaken in accord with the “Conservation Commission policy and guidelines for the performance assessment of conservation reserve and forest management plans and biodiversity management in WA”. Further details are available at www.conservation.wa.gov.au. The use of Department of Environment and Conservation (DEC) data for the production of this report is acknowledged. Approved at Conservation Commission meeting –11th May 2009 Conservation Commission of Western Australia Corner of Hackett Drive and Australia II Drive Crawley WA 6009 Status Performance Assessment - Biodiversity Conservation on Western Australian Islands CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................. 1 1. INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • REPTILES; PREDATORS Aild AMPHIBIANS and BIRDS Cook
    AiiPHIBIA.NS AfJD REPTILES; PREDATORS AilD PREY AMPHIBIANS AND BIRDS by Willian-L E. Cook Columbia Greene Community College BIBLIOGRAPHY OF HERPETOLOG ICAL REFERENCES IN AUSTRALIAN ORNITHOLOGICAL JOURNALS r-sT^^^TViY) by Glenn M. Shea <cC^\-\"\ 1 University of Sydney ^ SMITHSONIAN HERPETOLOGICAL INFORMATION SERVICE NO. 73 . - 1 - Despite being ornithological journals, The Emu, the Australian Bird Bander, the Australian Bird Watcher, Birds, Australian Birds, Corelia, the South Australian Ornithologist and the Sunbird all contain numerous valuable observations on reptiles an(i frogs. These are mostly hjilden amongst orni thologic:al observations, and are, for the most part, inacessible to herpetologists by normal data-retrieval methods. Three species indices have been published to the Emu, covering volumes to 1960 (Wells, 1922; McGiU, 1953, 1962) and one to the South Australian Ornithologist (Condon et a_l. , 1975), covering volumes to 197L, but those only covered birds. Individual volume indices to the other journals are similarly restricted in scope. The following bibliography included most of the herpetological citations in these eight Journals to the en<i of 1985. Publication details of each journal are given in Table I. In general, I have excluded those papers that note only "lizards", "snakes" or "reptiles" at a particular mainland locality (although such data on islands is included), that only cite a previously published reference to reptiles (although citations from newspaper articles are included) or that are only supposition (e.g., the fre<iuent suggestion that goannas are probably a major predator) In the cross-indices, I have attempted, where possible, to identify the reptile and amphibian species involved on the basis of the common names or descriptions originally used.
    [Show full text]
  • Gilbert's Potoroo (Potorous Gilbertii) Recovery Plan
    Gilbert’s potoroo (Potorous gilbertii) Recovery Plan Wildlife Management Program No. 62 Western Australia Department of Parks and Wildlife September 2016 Wildlife Management Program No. 62 Gilbert’s potoroo (Potorous gilbertii) Recovery Plan September 2016 Western Australia Department of Parks and Wildlife Locked Bag 104, Bentley Delivery Centre, Western Australia 6983 i Foreword Recovery plans are developed within the framework laid down in Department of Parks and Wildlife Corporate Policy Statement No. 35; Conserving Threatened Species and Ecological Communities (DPaW 2015a), Corporate Guidelines No. 35; Listing and Recovering Threatened Species and Ecological Communities (DPaW 2015b), and the Australian Government Department of the Environment and Energy’s Recovery Planning Compliance Checklist for Legislative and Process Requirements (Department of the Environment 2014a). Recovery plans outline the recovery actions that are needed to urgently address those threatening processes most affecting the ongoing survival of threatened taxa or ecological communities, and begin the recovery process. Recovery plans are a partnership between the Department of the Environment and Energy and the Department of Parks and Wildlife. The Department of Parks and Wildlife acknowledges the role of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 and the Department of the Environment and Energy in guiding the implementation of this recovery plan. The attainment of objectives and the provision of funds necessary to implement actions are subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. This recovery plan was approved by the Department of Parks and Wildlife, Western Australia. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in status of the taxon or ecological community, and the completion of recovery actions.
    [Show full text]