DOCSLIB.ORG

Fyodor Dostoevsky : Notes from Underground

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

M.A. (ENGLISH) PART-I COURSE-VII SEMESTER-II NINETEENTH CENTURY FICTION Lesson No. 15 Author : Dr. Sushil Kumar Fyodor Dostoevsky : Notes from Underground Introduction : The historical, cultural and political background of an author plays a significant role in the constitution of his/her fictional discourses. These aspects must be studied in order to comprehend the geo-political, historical, cultural and ideological positions of a literary writer. It is more important in the case of 19th century Russian writer like Dostoevsky who belongs to a complex set of historical, political and cultural circumstances of Russia. Like many of his contemporaries, he responded to the cultural, historical and political climate of the transformation era of Russia in his writings. The examining of the cultural and political background of Dostoevsky shows some sort of similarity in his upbringing and immediate ideological environment. So, his response to the socialist discursive ideas is predominantly unique and his fiction becomes an attempt to critique that heritage by revisiting, appropriating and articulating afresh the rich historical, political and cultural heritage of Russian Society. Fyodor Mikhailovich Dostoevsky: Life and Works Fyodor Mikhailovich Dostoevsky is a versatile genius and prolific writer. He is a novelist, short story writer, essayist, journalist and a philosopher. He was born in 1821, in Moscow, Russia. His parents Maria Fyodorovna Dostoevskaya and Mikhail Andreevich Dostoyevsky belonged to a mixed ethnic and multi-denominational noble family from the Pinsk region. He was the second among seven siblings. Dostoevsky’s father was supposed to work as a priest like his ancestors but he ran away from home and broke his relations with the family. His father was enrolled in Moscow's Imperial Medical- Surgical Academy in 1809. He served as a military doctor and senior physician in Moscow hospital. He worked in the Mariinsky Hospital that was for the poor. After the birth of Dostoevsky, he was promoted as a collegiate assessor and got legal status of nobility. This status enabled him to own an estate in a town Darovoye. It was about 150 km away from Moscow and Dostoevsky used to spend summer there. Dostoevsky’s mother died of tuberculosis on September 27, 1837 and after two years, his father was murdered. Dostoyevsky’s nanny, Alena Frolovna introduced him to literature and developed his reading habits in his childhood. His family atmosphere made him familiar with world literature and writers like Karamzin, Pushkin, Derzhavin, Ann Radcliffe, Schiller, Goethe, Cervantes, Walter Scott, Homer and others. Besides, the M.A. (English) Part-I (Semester-II) 49 Course-VII impact of some horrible experiences of his childhood days can be seen in his writings. Once a nine year old girl patient came to his father, who was raped brutally by a drunkard. The memory of that incident haunted his sensitivity throughout his life. In his childhood, he was hot headed, pale, introvert and a dreamer. He did not like his school much because of his aristocratic schoolmates. Dostoevsky joined Nikolayev Military Engineering Institute at St Petersburg in January 1838 to receive education. He could not enjoy his studies because of his lack of interest in science, mathematics and military engineering. He was interested in drawing and architecture. He felt like an outsider in the institute. After getting the degree, he worked as an engineer and also translated the books and earned some money. He appeared on the literary scene by translating Honoré de Balzac's novel Eugénie Grandet. He started writing in his 20s and he wrote his first novel, Poor Folk, in 1840 when he was 25 years old and became popular among the literary writers. He established himself as a genius writer after the publication of his first novel. It was well received and Harold Bloom quotes well known critic Belinsky who admired this novel as a first “social novel” (12). He was arrested by the state for his participation in a literary discussion group in the Petrashevsky Circle in 1849. It was a society for liberal utopian world. He was charged by the Czar administration for reading and circulating the works by Belinsky and Gogol and awarded death sentence but at the last moment, the death sentence was converted into life imprisonment with rigorous work at Omex jail at Siberia. He was diagnosed with epilepsy during his confinement and released from the jail on medical grounds. He was released from the prison on February, 14 1854. He was forced to work as a soldier after his release. But after some time, he left his military job in order to concentrate on writing. He wrote his second novel, The Double in 1846. His novel The House of the Dead is about his horrible experience in prison. It was published in 1861 and it was a first attempt of its kind about the conditions of prisons in Russia. He was very much impressed by Belinsky’s logic, rationality, idea of justice and his concern for the marginalized sections of society. But he could not like his orthodox atheism and strong disliking for religion. After that he wrote some short stories like "Mr. Prokharchin", "The Landlady", "A Weak Heart", and "White Nights". He launched a journal The Times in 1861 with the help of his brother Mikhaile. In 1882-1883, he set out on a journey for Europe, it gave impetus to his anti Europe ideas. Dostoevsky taught to school children and here he came into contact with Maria Dmitrievna Isaeva (1857–1864) and fell in love with her. They got married in Semipalatinsk on February 7, 1857 and after her death he got married to Anna Grigoryevna Snitkina (1867–1881). His children were Sonya (1868), Lyubov (1869–1926), Fyodor (1871–1922), Alexey (1875–1878). Dostoevsky worked as a journalist, editor and M.A. (English) Part-I (Semester-II) 50 Course-VII a diary writer. In his Diary, he discussed many burning issues related to society, religion, politics and ethics. He travelled throughout Europe and he suffered a lot of financial hardship due to his gambling addiction. At the same time, he established himself as a well known writer and his books have been translated in many languages. He was in deep financial crisis and his stories couldn’t help him in this regard. He became the part of Betekov circle; they helped him for his survival. But the circle was disbanded after sometime. After that Dostoyevsky became friend of Apollon Maykov and his brother Valerian. He participated in the discussions organized by these circles. Dostoevsky’s contemporary Russian society was feudal and strictly believed in hierarchies. The political structures, religion, social norms, land ownership established hierarchy in the society. The society was divided into classes. The industrial labourer and marginalized peasantry were in majority of the population. In comparison to Europe, Russia’s educated and professional middle class was small in number. The historian Michael Lynch divided the population during 1897 census into four classes and categorized the population of Russia in four broad class groups. The upper class included royalty, nobility and higher clergy. It was 12.5 per cent of the total population; they lived comfortable life without any concern with the plight of poor peasantry and the Middle class comprised merchants, bureaucrats and professionals. They were only 1.5 per cent of total population and they are educated, liberal and reformists. The working class consisted of Factory workers, artisans, soldiers and sailors and they were only 4 per cent. Peasants included landed and landless farmers who were 82 per cent of the total population. They lacked opportunity of any kind to get education. They did not have the feelings of hatred towards Czar but they had the strong sense of revulsion towards the bureaucracy for their inhuman behavior. Similarly, Russian society of 19th century was highly patriarchal. Due to the growth in population, sharp inequalities and exploitative policies, the landlords became more and more exploitative and brute towards the peasantry. As a corollary, many people from marginalized section of society were forced to adopt the inhuman profession of prostitution. They were addict to alcohol and indulged in petty crimes. Russia came across many political and cultural movements during this time. These movements played a significant role in transforming Russian society into communism. The economy of Russia collapsed in the second half of the 19th century. Agriculture was also technically underdeveloped at the same time. Population of Russia doubled during 1850 to 1900. In peasantary, women were doubly at a disadvantage. They were treated like commodity and slaves. In this context, Dostoevsky became more and more popular among the readers and received numerous letters because he dealt with these issues in her works. He was invited by many rich persons. He was primarily M.A. (English) Part-I (Semester-II) 51 Course-VII concerned with the terrible aspects of human existence. The influence of Dostoevsky on the writers like Anton Chekhov, Ernest Hemingway, Friedrich Nietzsche and Jean-Paul Sartre and others was immense. He wrote 11 novels, three novellas, 17 short novels and numerous other works. His well known novels are Poor Folk (1846), The Double (1846), The Landlady (1847), Netochka Nezvanova (1849), Uncle's Dream (1859), The Village of Stepanchikovo (1859), Humiliated and Insulted (1861), The House of the Dead (1862), Notes from Underground (1864), Crime and Punishment (1866), The Gambler (1867), The Idiot (1869), The Eternal Husband (1870), Demons (1872), The Adolescent (1875), The Brothers Karamazov (1880). He also wrote short stories collections and novelettes like "Mr. Prokharchin" (1846) "Another Man's Wife and a Husband under the Bed" (1848) "The Honest Thief" (1848) "The Christmas Tree and a Wedding" (1848) "White Nights" (1848) "A Nasty Anecdote" (1862) "The Crocodile" (1865) "Bobok" (1873) "The Beggar Boy at Christ's Christmas Tree" (1876) "The Meek One" (1876) "The Peasant Marey" (1876) "The Dream of a Ridiculous Man" (1877).
Recommended publications
  • John Steinbeck As a Radical Novelist Shawn Jasinski University of Vermont

    John Steinbeck As a Radical Novelist Shawn Jasinski University of Vermont

    University of Vermont ScholarWorks @ UVM Graduate College Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 2008 John Steinbeck As a Radical Novelist Shawn Jasinski University of Vermont Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/graddis Recommended Citation Jasinski, Shawn, "John Steinbeck As a Radical Novelist" (2008). Graduate College Dissertations and Theses. 117. https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/graddis/117 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations and Theses at ScholarWorks @ UVM. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate College Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ UVM. For more information, please contact [email protected]. JOHN STEINBECK AS A RADICAL NOVELIST A Thesis Presented by Shawn Mark Jasinski to The Faculty of the Graduate College of The University of Vermont In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Specializing in English May, 2008 Accepted by the Faculty of the Graduate College, The University of Vermont, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts specializing in English. Thesis Examination Committee: Advisor - John ~yhnari,lP$. D +A d)d Chairperson Patrick Neal, Ph. D. /'----I Vice President for Research and Dean of Graduate Studies Date: April 4", 2008 ABSTRACT The radical literary tradition of the 1930‟s inspired many American authors to become more concerned with the struggle of the proletariat. John Steinbeck is one of these authors. Steinbeck‟s novels throughout the 1930‟s and 1940‟s display a lack of agreement with the common Communist principles being portrayed by other radical novelists, but also a definite alignment with several more basic Marxist principles.
  • Thackeray's Satire on British Society of the Early Victorian Era Through

    Thackeray's Satire on British Society of the Early Victorian Era Through

    PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI i MATERIALISM AND SOCIAL STATUS: THACKERAY’S SATIRE ON BRITISH SOCIETY OF THE EARLY VICTORIAN ERA THROUGH REBECCA SHARP CHARACTER IN VANITY FAIR AThesis Presented as Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements to Obtain the Sarjana Pendidikan Degree in English Language Education By Nadia Octaviani Student Number: 021214111 ENGLISH LANGUAGE EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM DEPARTMENT OF LANGUAGE AND ARTS EDUCATION FACULTY OF TEACHERS TRAINING AND EDUCATION SANATA DHARMA UNIVERSITY YOGYAKARTA 2008 i i PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI vi We are what we imagine Our very existence consist in our imagination of ourselves Our best destiny is to imagine who and what we are The greatest tragedy to befall us is to go unimagined N. Scott Nomaday This thesis is dedicated to my family, to my friends, and to my self. vi vi PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank those who have given me their affection, support, guidance and criticism in finishing every part of my thesis. First of all, I would like to bestow my gratitude to Allah s.w.t. for guiding and keeping me not to stray from His path and finally finish my thesis. My deepest gratitude is given to my beloved dad and mom, Pak Kun and Mama Ning, who have given me their never-ending affection and prayer to support me through the life. I also thank them for keeping asking patiently on the progress of my thesis.
  • FYODOR DOSTOYEVSKY Read by Constantine Gregory

    FYODOR DOSTOYEVSKY Read by Constantine Gregory

    The COMPLETE CLASSICS Idiot UNABRIDGED FYODOR DOSTOYEVSKY Read by Constantine Gregory Prince Lyov Nikolayevitch Myshkin is one of the great characters in Russian literature. Is he a saint or just naïve? Is he an idealist or, as many in General Epanchin’s society feel, an ‘idiot’? Certainly his return to St Petersburg after years in a Swiss clinic has a dramatic effect on the beautiful Aglaia, youngest of the Epanchin daughters, and on the charismatic but wilful Nastasya Filippovna. As he paints a vivid picture of Russian society, Dostoyevsky shows how principles conflict with emotions – with tragic results. Constantine Gregory is an actor, dialogue coach and ‘voice’. Constantine has more than 30 years’ experience in all these capacities on international projects with many major film directors, including Danny Boyle, Bernardo Bertolucci, Terry Gilliam, Neil Jordan and Julie Taymor and with actors such as Anthony Hopkins, Jessica Lange, Nicole Kidman, George Clooney, Gerard Depardieu, Chiwetel Eijofor, Keanu Reeves, Eva Green and many, many others. With Edmund Caldecott, Constantine runs the website Total running time: 24:58:10 • 21 CDs Spoken Ink, dedicated to short audios for download, and for which he has recorded a View our catalogue online at n-ab.com/cat number of short stories himself. = Downloads (M4B chapters or MP3 files) = CDs (disc–track) 1 1-1 The Idiot 8:32 23 3-7 Myshkin turned round quickly… 12:04 2 1-2 Such omniscient gentlemen are to be found… 9:06 24 3-8 Chapter 8 11:32 3 1-3 ‘But perhaps I do know!’ said the official…
  • Upton Sinclair Against Capitalism

    Upton Sinclair Against Capitalism

    Scientific Journal in Humanities, 1(1):41-46,2012 ISSN:2298-0245 Walking Through The Jungle: Upton Sinclair Against Capitalism George SHADURI* Abstract At the beginning of the 20th century, the American novel started exploring social themes and raising social problems. Upton Sinclair’s novel The Jungle, which appeared in 1906, was a true sensation for American reading community. On the one hand, it described the outra- geous practices of meatpacking industry prevalent at those times on the example of slaughterhouses in Chicago suburbs; on the other hand, it exposed the hapless life of American worker: the book showed what kind of suffering the worker experienced from his thankless work and poor living conditions. Sinclair hoped that the novel, which was avidly read both in America and abroad, would help improve the plight of American worker. However, to his disappointment, the government and society focused their attention exclusively on unhealthy meatpacking practices, which brought about necessary, but still superficial reforms, ignoring the main topic: the life of the common worker. Sinclair was labeled “a muckraker”, whereas he in reality aspired for the higher ideal of changing the existing social order, the thought expressed both in his novels and articles. The writer did not take into account that his ideas of non-violent, but drastic change of social order were alien for American society, for which capitalism was the most natural and acceptable form of functioning. The present article refers to the opinions of both American and non-American scholars to explain the reasons for the failure of Sinclair’s expectations, and, based on their views, concludes why such a failure took place.
  • A Tragedy of Unforgiveness

    A Tragedy of Unforgiveness

    29 deborah a . martinsen Columbia University The Idiot: A Tragedy of Unforgiveness In characterizing The Idiot as a tragedy of unforgiveness, I am offering a new perspective on Nastasya Filippovna and the choices she faces throughout the novel, many of which hinge on Nastasya’s ability to forgive her wrongdoers or herself or both . In her article on forgiveness for The Routledge Encyclope- dia of Philosophy, Kathryn Norlock writes “Forgiveness is a response to wrong- doing characterized by forswearing or overcoming the fullness of blame that one could otherwise justifiably hold against a wrongdoer” 1. While some phi- losophers view forgiveness primarily as an internal process “characterized by a change of heart or a choice to revise one’s dispositions, beliefs, or attitudes to- ward the offender”,2 others see it primarily as a social practice “characterized by effecting of a morally significant consequence such as the release or relief of an offender” 3. In the case of Nastasya Filippovna, forgiveness is primarily an inter- nal process, one that requires that she overcome, on moral grounds, “the in- tense negative reactive attitudes – the vindictive passions of resentment, anger, hatred, and the desire for revenge – that are quite naturally occasioned when one has been wronged by another responsible agent” .4 The Idiot’s main action pivots around Nastasya Filippovna, whose guardi- an, Afanasy Totsky, abused her when she was younger and now wants to mar- ry elsewhere . As the narrator makes clear, Nastasya Filippovna hates not on- ly Totsky, but herself . The question posed throughout Part One is what will she do? Will she follow Totsky’s script and marry Ganya Ivolgin? Or will she act as 1 Kathryn J .
  • Troubled Masculinity at Midlife: a Study of Dickens's Hard Times

    Troubled Masculinity at Midlife: a Study of Dickens's Hard Times

    235 Troubled Masculinity at Midlife: A Study of Dickens’s Hard Times HATADA Mio Hard Timesで提示される “Fact”と“Fancy”の2つの対照的な世界、あるいは価値観は、一見 すると相反するもののように思われるが、この小説は両者の対立よりもむしろ、両者がいかに 密接な関係を持っているかを暗示しているように思われる。そして、主要な登場人物は複雑に 絡まり合ったこれら2つの世界に、それぞれのやり方で関わりを持ち、反応を示す。興味深い ことに、2つの絡み合う世界は、主要な人物（その多くは中年の男性である）の抱えている問 題とも密接な関係を持っている。本稿ではHard Timesにおける2つの世界を、作品中で直接姿 を現すことのないSissy の父親の存在を手がかりに、中年期の男性が経験するmasculinityの危 機、という観点から再考している。 キーワード：aging, masculinity, gender Introduction It is well known that F. R. Leavis included Hard Times in his work The Great Tradition, calling it “a completely serious work of art” (Leavis 258) with the “subtlety of achieved art” (Leavis 279). Much earlier, John Ruskin estimated the novel as “the greatest” of Dickens’s novels, and asserted that it “should be studied with close and earnest care by persons interested in social questions” (34). Many other critics make much of the aspect of Hard Times as a critique of the contemporary society, and it has often been treated with other industrial novels such as Elizabeth Gaskell’s North and South (1855). Humphry House, for instance, points out that Dickens was “thinking much more about social problems,” and that “Hard Times is one of Dickens’s most thought-about books.” He goes on to assert that “in the ’fi fties, his novels begin to show a greater complication of plot than before” because “ he was intending to use them as a vehicle of more concentrated sociological argument” (House 205). David Lodge, too, affi rms, “Hard Times manifests its identity as a polemical work, a critique of mid-Victorian industrial society dominated by materialism, acquisitiveness and ruthlessly competitive capitalist economics,” which are “represented... by the Utilitarians” (Lodge 69‒70).
  • Prince Myshkin As a Tragic Interpretation of Don Quixote Slav N

    Prince Myshkin As a Tragic Interpretation of Don Quixote Slav N

    Marshall University Marshall Digital Scholar Modern Languages Faculty Research Modern Languages 2015 Prince Myshkin as a Tragic Interpretation of Don Quixote Slav N. Gratchev PhD Marshall University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://mds.marshall.edu/languages_faculty Part of the Modern Languages Commons, and the Modern Literature Commons Recommended Citation Gratchev, Slav N. "Prince Myshkin as a Tragic Interpretation of Don Quixote." Cervantes: Bulletin of the Cervantes Society of America, vol. 35, no. 1, 2015, pp. 137-51. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Modern Languages at Marshall Digital Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Modern Languages Faculty Research by an authorized administrator of Marshall Digital Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Prince Myshkin as a Tragic Interpretation of Don Quixote _______________________________________S!"# N. G$"%&'(# )$*$+,+-.!/, 0'+!( #+$%)"!!/ -1 one doubts Fyodor Dostoevsky’s profound and direct indebtedness to Miguel de Cervantes in !e Idiot, manifested in the obvious connection between Don Quixote Sand Prince Myshkin, no one yet has fully analyzed both how and why Myshkin—a character more dialogically elaborate and versatile than Don Quixote—turned out to be more limited in literary expressivity than his more “monological” counterpart. 2e essay seeks to remedy this analytical absence but focusing on just how the realness of Dostoevsky’s hero became a weakened version of Cervantes’s monologic character, and thus how this weakened realness negatively a3ects Myshkin’s literary an- swerability. When the 45-year-old Prince Myshkin returns to Russia after spend- ing several years at a Swiss sanatorium, he 6nds himself at the center of attention, an attention that he never intended to have.
  • The Struggle for Spiritual Supremacy: Dostoevsky's Philosophy Or History and Eschatology

    The Struggle for Spiritual Supremacy: Dostoevsky's Philosophy Or History and Eschatology

    Western Washington University Western CEDAR WWU Honors Program Senior Projects WWU Graduate and Undergraduate Scholarship Spring 1994 The Struggle for Spiritual Supremacy: Dostoevsky's Philosophy or History and Eschatology Andrew Wender Western Washington University Follow this and additional works at: https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwu_honors Part of the History Commons, and the Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Wender, Andrew, "The Struggle for Spiritual Supremacy: Dostoevsky's Philosophy or History and Eschatology" (1994). WWU Honors Program Senior Projects. 339. https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwu_honors/339 This Project is brought to you for free and open access by the WWU Graduate and Undergraduate Scholarship at Western CEDAR. It has been accepted for inclusion in WWU Honors Program Senior Projects by an authorized administrator of Western CEDAR. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Struggle for Spiritual Supremacy: Dostoevsky's Philosophy or History and Eschatology Andrew Wender Presented to Prof. George Mariz and Prof. Susan Costanzo Project Advisers Honors 490 - Senior Project June 6, 1994 • ............._ Honors Program HONORS fflESIS In presenting this Honors Paper in partial requirements for a bachelor's degree at Western Washington University, I agree that the Library shall make its copies freely available for inspection. I further agree that extensive copying of this thesis is allowable only for scholarly purposes. It is understood that any publication of this thesis for commercial pur:uoses or for financial eain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Bellingham, Washington 98225-9089 □ f2061 676-3034 An Equal Oppartunit_v University Table of Contents Page I. Introduction . 2 II. Historical Context And Intellectual Development or Dostoevsky's Philosophy or History ..............................
  • Rimsky-Korsakov and His World

    Rimsky-Korsakov and His World

    © Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical means without prior written permission of the publisher. David Brodbeck The Professor and the Sea Princess: Letters of Nikolai Rimsky-Korsakov and Nadezhda Zabela-Vrubel EDITED BY MARINA FROLOVA-WALKER TRANSLATED BY JONATHAN WALKER I am still filled, my dear, dear friend, Filled with your visage, filled with you! . It is as if a light-winged angel Descended to converse with me. Leaving the angel at the threshold Of holy heaven, now alone, I gather some angelic feathers Shed by rainbow wings . —Apollon Maykov (1852), set by Rimsky-Korsakov as No. 4 of his Opus 50 songs and dedicated to Nadezhda Zabela-Vrubel “I am rather dry by nature,” confessed Rimsky-Korsakov in one of his letters.1 This is indeed the prevailing impression we are likely to draw from his biographies, or even from his own memoirs. We know so much about the externals of his life, and yet the inner man somehow eludes us, obscured by his professorial image: a kindly but reserved man, with a pos- itive outlook on life, dignified and of impeccable morals. The contrast with the wild biographies of Musorgsky and Tchaikovsky allows us to suppose that Rimsky-Korsakov was really rather ordinary, even a little dreary. 1. Maykov’s Russian original of the epigraph above is as follows: Yeshcho ya poln, o drug moy milïy, / Tvoim yavlen'yem, poln toboy!. ./ Kak budto angel legkokrïlïy / Sletal besedovat' so mnoy, / I, provodiv yego v preddver'ye svyatïkh nebes, ya bez nego / Sbirayu vïpavshiye per'ya / Iz krïl'yev raduzhnïkh yego… • 3 • For general queries, contact [email protected] © Copyright, Princeton University Press.
  • Legend of the Grand Inquisitor’ Reconsidered Literary Irony and Theological Seriousness in Its Representation of Christ

    Legend of the Grand Inquisitor’ Reconsidered Literary Irony and Theological Seriousness in Its Representation of Christ

    Journal of Eastern Christian Studies 59(1-2), 103-121. doi: 10.2143/JECS.59.1.2023429 T©HE 2007 ‘LEGEND by Journal OF THE of EasternGRAND Christian INQUISITOR Studies.’ RECONSIDERED All rights reserved. 103 THE ‘LEGEND OF THE GRAND INQUISITOR’ RECONSIDERED LITERARY IRONY AND THEOLOGICAL SERIOUSNESS IN ITS REPRESENTATION OF CHRIST WIL VAN DEN BERCKEN* The chapter ‘The Grand Inquisitor’ in Dostoevsky’s novel The Brothers Karamazov is one of the most intriguing religious-philosophical pieces in lit- erature. It is an original interpretation of the figure of Christ and of the na- ture of Christian belief. The story has been commented on by many inter- preters but was more often used as an argument for or against a certain ec- clesiastical theological standpoint, rather than appreciated as an autono- mous piece of literature. In order to make a sound theological evaluation, however, one must first approach the story within its own literary frame- work. What literary means does Dostoevsky use to convey his view of Christ and Christianity? Before analysing the theological content of the story, I would like to treat three aspects of literary style in ‘The Grand Inquisi- tor’1: irony in the presentation of the story, the anti-iconographical picture of Christ and the indirect method of presenting his message. IRONY First a word on the general structure of the story of ‘The Grand Inquisitor’ itself. It is a story within the larger story of the novel and is not part of the plot. As regards content, it is linked to the discussion between the brothers, Ivan and Aleksei, on the suffering in the world, described in the previous chapter.
  • ABSTRACT Dostoevsky's View of the Russian Soul and Its Impact on the Russian Question in the Brothers Karamazov Paul C. Schlau

    ABSTRACT Dostoevsky's View of the Russian Soul and Its Impact on the Russian Question in the Brothers Karamazov Paul C. Schlau

    ABSTRACT Dostoevsky’s View of the Russian Soul and its Impact on the Russian Question in The Brothers Karamazov Paul C. Schlaudraff Director: Adrienne M. Harris, Ph.D Fyodor Dostoevsky, one of Russia’s most renowned novelists, profoundly affected the way that Russia would think of itself in the years following his death. One of the most important issues for Dostoevsky and other authors at the time was the reconciliation of the peasant and noble classes in the aftermath of the serf emancipation in Russia. Dostoevsky believed that the solution to this issue would come from the Russian peasantry. My research investigates Dostoevsky’s view of the “Russian soul”, which is the particular set of innate characteristics which distinguishes Russians from other nationalities. Furthermore, it examines how Dostoevsky’s view of the Russian soul affected his answer to the question of Russia’s ultimate destiny. During the 19th century, socialism was an especially popular answer to that question. Dostoevsky, however, presented an entirely different solution. Through a thorough examination of Dostoevsky’s final novel, The Brothers Karamazov, my thesis demonstrates this alternative solution and its significance in light of competing Russian theory during the 19th century. APPROVED BY DIRECTOR OF HONORS THESIS ______________________________________________________ Dr. Adrienne M. Harris, Department of Modern Languages APPROVED BY THE HONORS PROGRAM: ______________________________________________ Dr. Andrew Wisely, Director DATE: ________________________ DOSTOEVSKY’S VIEW OF THE RUSSIAN SOUL AND ITS IMPACT ON THE RUSSIAN QUESTION IN THE BROTHERS KARAMAZOV A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Baylor University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Honors Program By Paul C.
  • MAXIM LANDO, Piano

    MAXIM LANDO, Piano

    Candlelight Concert Society Presents MAXIM LANDO, piano Saturday, September 26, 2020, 7:30pm Broadcast Virtually PIOTR ILYICH TCHAIKOVSKY (1840-1893) The Seasons, op. 37a January: At the Fireside February: Carnival March: Song of the Lark April: Snowdrop May: Starlit Nights June: Barcarolle July: Song of the Reaper August: Harvest September: The Hunt October: Autumn Song November Troika December: Christmas NIKOLAI KAPUSTIN (1937-2020) Eight Concert Études, op 40 Prelude Reverie Toccatina Remembrance Raillery Pastorale Intermezzo Finale wine stewards. As a result, the singing and dancing that Program Notes takes place at their parties is always vigorous. Tchaikovsky captures this vitality through rapidly ______________________________ moving chords and arpeggios along with sudden Piotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky (1840-1893) changes from loud to soft. THE SEASONS, OP. 37a March: Chant de l'alouette (Song of In 1875, the editor of the Saint Petersburg music the Lark) magazine Nouvellist, Nikolay Matveyevich The field shimmering with flowers, Bernard, commissioned Tchaikovsky to write twelve the stars swirling in the heavens, short piano pieces, one for each month of the year. The the song of the lark commission came just as Tchaikovsky was enjoying fills the blue abyss. the resounding success of the Boston premiere of his (Apollon Maykov) First Piano Concerto (while simultaneously resenting its lukewarm reception in St. Petersburg). Bernard’s The melody Tchaikovsky creates for this piece imitates plan was to publish the pieces in each of the monthly not only the trilling of the lark through its ornamentation editions of the magazine throughout 1876. Bernard but also the swooping of the bird in flight through its chose the subtitles and epigraphs for the pieces with recurring six-note motif, which alternately rises and an eye to the experiences and emotions that were falls.