Lake Tanganyika Strategic Action Programme

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lake Tanganyika Strategic Action Programme ,,,,/ The Strategic Action Programme for the Protection of Biodiversity and Sustainable Management of the Natural Resources of Lake Tanganyika and its Basin November 2010 1 Page for Signature 2 Contents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................................................................................. 5 FOREWORD ............................................................................................................................................. 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................. 8 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS .......................................................................................................... 9 GLOSSARY OF TERMS ............................................................................................................................ 12 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 15 1.1 NEED FOR JOINT ACTION - SHARED RESOURCES IN LAKE TANGANYIKA AND ITS BASIN ............................ 15 1.1.1 The Lake Tanganyika and its Basin .................................................................................. 15 1.1.2 The People ....................................................................................................................... 16 1.1.3 Causes of Threats to Biodiversity and Sustainable Use of Natural Resources in the Lake Basin 18 1.1.4 Previous Projects and Research on Lake Tanganyika ...................................................... 18 1.2 JOINT COMMITMENTS TO FUTURE ACTIONS: THE CONVENTION ON THE SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT OF LAKE TANGANYIKA ................................................................................................................................ 19 2 BACKGROUND AND PRINCIPLES OF THE STRATEGIC ACTION PROGRAMME .......................... 20 2.1 RATIONALE OF THE STRATEGIC ACTION PROGRAMME ........................................................................ 20 2.2 GEOGRAPHICAL SCOPE OF THE LAKE TANGANYIKA SAP ..................................................................... 21 2.3 THE PURPOSE OF PRIORITIZATION................................................................................................... 21 2.4 NATIONAL ACTIONS WITHIN A REGIONAL FRAMEWORK ..................................................................... 21 2.5 PRINCIPLES OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT ...................................... 22 2.6 THE PROCESS OF CONSULTATION FOR THE SAP ................................................................................ 22 2.6.1 Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis ................................................................................. 23 2.6.2 National Stakeholder Consultations ................................................................................ 23 2.6.3 Regional Consultation ...................................................................................................... 24 2.6.4 National Policies and Action Plans ................................................................................... 24 2.6.5 Future Evolution of the SAP ............................................................................................. 28 3 THE LAKE TANGANYIKA AUTHORITY ................................................................................... 28 3.1 BACKGROUND AND ESTABLISHMENT OF THE LTA .............................................................................. 28 3.2 ORGANS OF THE LTA .................................................................................................................... 28 3.2.1 The LTA and the Convention ............................................................................................ 29 3.2.2 The Conference of Ministers ............................................................................................ 29 3.2.3 The Management Committee .......................................................................................... 30 3.2.4 LTA Secretariat ................................................................................................................. 30 3.3 THE LAKE TANGANYIKA REGIONAL INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME ........ 31 3.3.1 UNDP/GEF Partnership Interventions for the Implementation of the SAP for Lake Tanganyika Project ....................................................................................................................... 31 3.3.2 Coordination .................................................................................................................... 33 4 THE FRAMEWORK FOR THE SAP .......................................................................................... 34 4.1 THE ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK ....................................................................................................... 34 4.2 THE BASIS FOR PRIORITISATION ...................................................................................................... 35 4.3 NATIONAL ACTIONS WITHIN A REGIONAL FRAMEWORK ..................................................................... 36 5 PROGRAMME OF PRIORITY ACTIONS .................................................................................. 36 5.1 INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ............................................................................. 36 5.2 CROSSCUTTING THEMES ................................................................................................................ 37 5.2.1 Information Management ............................................................................................... 37 5.2.2 Socio-economic Development and Governance .............................................................. 37 5.2.3 Institutional and legal aspects, Capacity Building and Funding ...................................... 38 5.2.4 Environmental policy ....................................................................................................... 38 5.2.5 Environmental Education ................................................................................................. 38 5.3 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING ..................................................................................................... 38 3 5.4 ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE EFFECTS ..................................................................................... 39 5.4.1 Impacts of Increasing Temperatures ............................................................................... 40 5.4.2 Impacts of Decreased Precipitations ............................................................................... 40 5.4.3 Impacts of Increased Precipitations ................................................................................. 41 5.5 CONTROL AND PREVENTION OF BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS .................................................................... 42 5.5.1 Reduction of ecosystem productivity, biodiversity and resources ................................... 43 5.5.2 Alteration of the lake water budget and the economic use of the invaded surfaces ...... 44 5.6 DEVELOPMENT OF SUSTAINABLE FISHERIES ...................................................................................... 44 5.6.1 Excessive Fishing Effort in the Littoral Zone ..................................................................... 45 5.6.2 Excessive Fishing Effort in the Pelagic Zone ..................................................................... 46 5.6.3 Excessive or Uncontrolled Extraction of Ornamental Fish ............................................... 49 5.7 POLLUTION CONTROL.................................................................................................................... 50 5.7.1 Urban and Industrial Pollution ......................................................................................... 51 5.7.2 Harbour Pollution ............................................................................................................ 55 5.7.3 Pollution from Mining Activities ...................................................................................... 56 5.7.4 Risks of Major Marine Accidents ..................................................................................... 57 5.7.5 Petroleum exploration and production ............................................................................ 58 5.8 SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT ............................................................................................................. 59 5.8.1 Promotion of Sustainable Farming Practices ................................................................... 60 5.8.2 Control of Deforestation .................................................................................................. 62 5.8.3 Other unsustainable land uses......................................................................................... 63 5.9 PROTECTION OF IMPORTANT HABITATS FOR BIODIVERSITY ................................................................. 64 5.9.1 Threats to Protected Area Resources .............................................................................. 64 5.9.2 Conservation of Sensitive Coastal Habitats ..................................................................... 66 APPENDICES ............................................................................................................................... 69 APPENDIX I LIST OF STAKEHOLDERS INVOLVED IN THE CONSULTATION PROCESS
Recommended publications
  • Molecular Phylogenetic Evidence That the Chinese Viviparid Genus Margarya (Gastropoda: Viviparidae) Is Polyphyletic
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Springer - Publisher Connector Article SPECIAL ISSUE June 2013 Vol.58 No.18: 21542162 Adaptive Evolution and Conservation Ecology of Wild Animals doi: 10.1007/s11434-012-5632-y Molecular phylogenetic evidence that the Chinese viviparid genus Margarya (Gastropoda: Viviparidae) is polyphyletic DU LiNa1, YANG JunXing1*, RINTELEN Thomas von2*, CHEN XiaoYong1 & 3 ALDRIDGE David 1 State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650223, China; 2 Museum für Naturkunde, Leibniz-Institut für Evolutions- und Biodiversitätsforschung an der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin 10115, Germany; 3 Aquatic Ecology Group, Department of Zoology, Cambridge University, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK Received February 28, 2012; accepted May 25, 2012; published online February 1, 2013 We investigated the phylogeny of the viviparid genus Margarya, endemic to Yunnan, China, using two mitochondrial gene frag- ments (COI and 16S rRNA). The molecular phylogeny based on the combined dataset indicates that Margarya is polyphyletic, as two of the three well-supported clades containing species of Margarya also comprise species from other viviparid genera. In one clade, sequences of four species of Margarya even cluster indiscriminately with those of two species of Cipangopaludina, indi- cating that the current state of Asian viviparid taxonomy needs to be revised. Additionally, these data suggest that shell evolution in viviparids is complex, as even the large and strongly sculptured shells of Margarya, which are outstanding among Asian viviparids, can apparently be easily converted to simple smooth shells.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6 Crabs
    Chapter 6. Freshwater crabs of Africa: diversity, distribution, and conservation. Cumberlidge, N.¹ ¹ Department of Biology, Northern Michigan University, Marquette, Michigan 49855, USA The Purple March Crab Afrithelphusa monodosa (Endangered) which lives in swamps and year-round wetland habitats in north-western Guinea where it is known from only a few specimens from two localities. This species is clearly a competent air-breather and has a pair of well-developed pseudolungs. It is mainly threatened by habitat loss and degradation. © PIOTR NASKREKI An unidentifi ed freshwater crab species within the family Potamonautes. This specimen was collected in central Africa, a region noted for its limited fi eld sampling. © DENIS TWEDDLE IUCN AFR2011_pp178-199_chapter 6_crabs V2.indd 178 4/3/11 18:59:15 The Purple March Crab Afrithelphusa monodosa (Endangered) which lives in swamps and year-round wetland habitats in north-western Guinea. © PIOTR NASKREKI Potamonautes lirrangensis (Least Concern), a relatively abundant and widespread species found in large slow fl owing rivers in rainforests across central and eastern Africa. © DENIS TWEDDLE CONTENTS 6.1 Overview of the African freshwater crab fauna 180 6.1.1 Biogeographic patterns 182 6.2 Conservation status 183 6.3 Patterns of species richness 184 6.3.1 All freshwater crab species: interpretation of distribution patterns 186 6.3.2 Threatened species 187 6.3.3 Restricted range species 188 6.3.4 Data Defi cient species 190 6.4 Major threats 191 6.4.1 Habitat destruction 191 6.4.2 Pollution 192 6.4.3
    [Show full text]
  • Final Energy Report Tanzania
    Final Energy report Tanzania Commissioned by the Netherlands Enterprise Agency Report Tanzania Author: Kees Mokveld & Steven von Eije (RVO.nl) Date: 30-7-2018 Version: 6 (final) RVO 1. Tanzania general overview ...................................................................................................... 2 2. Energy overview ....................................................................................................................... 3 3. Renewable energy ................................................................................................................... 6 4. Energy efficiency ...................................................................................................................... 9 5. Governmental framework ..................................................................................................... 11 6. Regulatory framework ........................................................................................................... 14 7. Access to finance.................................................................................................................... 16 8. Opportunities and barriers for Dutch renewable energy companies in Tanzania ................ 18 9. Dutch companies active in Tanzania ...................................................................................... 22 10. Relevant Dutch support schemes .......................................................................................... 23 11. Relevant international donors ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Eco-Ethology of Shell-Dwelling Cichlids in Lake Tanganyika
    ECO-ETHOLOGY OF SHELL-DWELLING CICHLIDS IN LAKE TANGANYIKA THESIS Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE of Rhodes University by IAN ROGER BILLS February 1996 'The more we get to know about the two greatest of the African Rift Valley Lakes, Tanganyika and Malawi, the more interesting and exciting they become.' L.C. Beadle (1974). A male Lamprologus ocel/alus displaying at a heterospecific intruder. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The field work for this study was conducted part time whilst gworking for Chris and Jeane Blignaut, Cape Kachese Fisheries, Zambia. I am indebted to them for allowing me time off from work, fuel, boats, diving staff and equipment and their friendship through out this period. This study could not have been occured without their support. I also thank all the members of Cape Kachese Fisheries who helped with field work, in particular: Lackson Kachali, Hanold Musonda, Evans Chingambo, Luka Musonda, Whichway Mazimba, Rogers Mazimba and Mathew Chama. Chris and Jeane Blignaut provided funds for travel to South Africa and partially supported my work in Grahamstown. The permit for fish collection was granted by the Director of Fisheries, Mr. H.D.Mudenda. Many discussions were held with Mr. Martin Pearce, then the Chief Fisheries Officer at Mpulungu, my thanks to them both. The staff of the JLB Smith Institute and DIFS (Rhodes University) are thanked for help in many fields: Ms. Daksha Naran helped with computing and organisation of many tables and graphs; Mrs. S.E. Radloff (Statistics Department, Rhodes University) and Dr. Horst Kaiser gave advice on statistics; Mrs Nikki Kohly, Mrs Elaine Heemstra and Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Revisiting Public-Private Partnerships in the Power Sector
    Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Revisiting Public-Private Partnerships in the Power Sector A WORLD BANK STUDY Revisiting Public-Private Partnerships in the Power Sector Maria Vagliasindi Washington, D.C. © 2013 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW, Washington DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000; Internet: www.worldbank.org Some rights reserved 1 2 3 4 16 15 14 13 World Bank Studies are published to communicate the results of the Bank’s work to the development community with the least possible delay. The manuscript of this paper therefore has not been prepared in accordance with the procedures appropriate to formally edited texts. This work is a product of the staff of The World Bank with external contributions. Note that The World Bank does not necessarily own each component of the content included in the work. The World Bank therefore does not warrant that the use of the content contained in the work will not infringe on the rights of third parties. The risk of claims resulting from such infringement rests solely with you. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of The World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denomina- tions, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Multilocus Phylogeny of the Afrotropical Freshwater Crab Fauna Reveals Historical Drainage Connectivity and Transoceanic Dispersal Since the Eocene
    Syst. Biol. 64(4):549–567, 2015 © The Author(s) 2015. Published by Oxford University Press, on behalf of the Society of Systematic Biologists. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: [email protected] DOI:10.1093/sysbio/syv011 Advance Access publication February 3, 2015 Multilocus Phylogeny of the Afrotropical Freshwater Crab Fauna Reveals Historical Drainage Connectivity and Transoceanic Dispersal Since the Eocene ,∗ , SAV E L R. DANIELS1 ,ETHEL E. PHIRI1,SEBASTIAN KLAUS2 3,CHRISTIAN ALBRECHT4, AND NEIL CUMBERLIDGE5 1Department of Botany and Zoology, Private Bag X1, University of Stellenbosch, Matieland 7602, South Africa; 2Department of Ecology and Evolution, J. W. Goethe-University, Biologicum, Frankfurt am Main 60438, Germany; 3Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041, Peoples Republic of China; 4Department of Animal Ecology and Systematics, Justus Liebig University, Giessen 35392, Germany; and 5Department of Biology, Northern Michigan University, Marquette, MI 49855-5376, USA ∗ Correspondence to be sent to: Department of Botany and Zoology, Private Bag X1, University of Stellenbosch, Matieland 7602, South Africa; E-mail: mailto:[email protected] Received 15 November 2014; reviews returned 22 December 2014; accepted 28 January 2015 Associate Editor: Adrian Paterson Abstract.—Phylogenetic reconstruction, divergence time estimations and ancestral range estimation were undertaken for 66% of the Afrotropical freshwater crab fauna (Potamonautidae) based on four partial DNA loci (12S rRNA, 16S rRNA, cytochrome oxidase one [COI], and histone 3). The present study represents the most comprehensive taxonomic sampling of any freshwater crab family globally, and explores the impact of paleodrainage interconnectivity on cladogenesis among freshwater crabs. Phylogenetic analyses of the total evidence data using maximum-likelihood (ML), maximum parsimony (MP), and Bayesian inference (BI) produced a robust statistically well-supported tree topology that reaffirmed the monophyly of the Afrotropical freshwater crab fauna.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Tanganyika Biodiversity Project Projet Sur La Biodiversité Du Lac Tanganyika
    Lake Tanganyika Biodiversity Project Projet sur la Biodiversité du Lac Tanganyika Lake Tanganyika: Results and Experiences of the UNDP/GEF Conservation Initiative (RAF/92/G32) in Burundi, D.R. Congo, Tanzania, and Zambia prepared by Kelly West 28 February 2001 TABLE of CONTENTS ACRONYMS 08 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION to LAKE TANGANYIKA 11 1.1 Why is Lake Tanganyika Special? 11 1.1.1 Physiographic Considerations 11 1.1.2 Biological Considerations 12 1.1.3 Socio-Political Considerations 17 1.2 Threats to this Resource 19 1.2.1 Pollution 19 1.2.2 Sedimentation 20 1.2.3 Overfishing 21 1.2.4 People 22 CHAPTER 2. ORIGIN, STRUCTURE and EVOLUTION of LTBP 23 2.1 History 23 2.2 Project Objectives 25 2.3 Project Structure 25 2.4 Chronology of LTBP 28 CHAPTER 3. IMPLEMENTATION and OUTPUTS of LTBP 31 3.1 Capacity-Building and Training 31 3.1.1 Material Capacity Building 31 3.1.2 Human Capacity Building and Training 32 3.2 Technical Programmes 35 3.2.1 Biodiversity Special Study 35 3.2.1.1 Objectives and Strategy 35 3.2.1.2 Products 36 3.2.1.2.1 Methodology 37 3.2.1.2.2 Human Capacity 38 3.2.1.2.3 Databases 38 3.2.1.2.4 Biodiversity in Lake Tanganyika 39 Habitats 39 Lakewide Biodiversity Patterns 41 Biodiversity Patterns near PAs 41 3.2.2 Pollution Special Study 45 3.2.2.1 Objectives and Strategy 45 3.2.2.2 Products 46 3.2.2.2.1 Water Quality Studies 46 3.2.2.2.2 Industrial Pollution Inventory 47 Bujumbura, Burundi 48 2 Uvira, D.R.
    [Show full text]
  • PURPA and Solar by Robert Shapiro, in Washington
    April 2017 PURPA and Solar by Robert Shapiro, in Washington Solar developers are again using a 1978 federal law that requires utilities to sign long-term power purchase agreements to secure utility PPAs after years of disuse, but the recent track record of developers trying to use this statute is mixed. The law, called the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act or PURPA, requires utilities to buy electricity from renewable energy projects of up to 80 megawatts in size at the “avoided cost” the utility would otherwise spend to purchase or generate the electricity itself. PURPA is expected to overtake state renewable portfolio standards as the biggest driver for utility-scale PPAs in 2017 due to falling solar electricity prices. Solar electricity can now be delivered at less than utility avoided costs in such states as North Carolina, Georgia, Utah and Oregon. Any developer planning to use PURPA should analyze first how likely it is to end up bat- tling with the utility before the state public utility commission and, if so, with what likeli- hood of success. Potentially Useful Tool For more than 10 years, renewable energy developers have relied on renewable portfolio standards, or RPS, created under state laws as the primary way to get a utility to enter into a long-term PPA that can support project financing. Twenty-nine states and the District of Columbia have RPS standards. However, as most of the state utilities in RPS states have signed / continued page 2 IN THIS ISSUE 1 PURPA and Solar 6 Emerging Storage A TAX EQUITY TRANSACTION was set aside on audit.
    [Show full text]
  • "The Status and Distribution of Freshwater Crabs [Central Africa]" Neil Cumberlidge Northern Michigan University
    Northern Michigan University The Commons Book Sections/Chapters 2011 "The status and distribution of freshwater crabs [Central Africa]" Neil Cumberlidge Northern Michigan University Follow this and additional works at: http://commons.nmu.edu/facwork_bookchapters Part of the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Cumberlidge N. 2011. Chapter 6. The ts atus and distribution of freshwater crabs, pp. 71-78. In: Brooks, E.G.E., Allen, D.J. and Darwall, W.R.T. (Compilers). 2011. The tS atus and Distribution of Freshwater Biodiversity in Central Africa. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN: i-ix+140pp. This Book Section/Chapter is brought to you for free and open access by The ommonC s. It has been accepted for inclusion in Book Sections/Chapters by an authorized administrator of The ommonC s. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. Chapter 6. Freshwater crabs of Africa: diversity, distribution, and conservation. Cumberlidge, N.¹ ¹ Department of Biology, Northern Michigan University, Marquette, Michigan 49855, USA The Purple March Crab Afrithelphusa monodosa (Endangered) which lives in swamps and year-round wetland habitats in north-western Guinea where it is known from only a few specimens from two localities. This species is clearly a competent air-breather and has a pair of well-developed pseudolungs. It is mainly threatened by habitat loss and degradation. © PIOTR NASKREKI An unidentifi ed freshwater crab species within the family Potamonautes. This specimen was collected in central Africa, a region noted for its limited fi eld sampling. © DENIS TWEDDLE The Purple March Crab Afrithelphusa monodosa (Endangered) which lives in swamps and year-round wetland habitats in north-western Guinea.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterizing Molluscan Shell Accumulations: Ecological, Depositional and Taphonomic Variations on the Northern Luiche River Platform
    Characterizing Molluscan Shell Accumulations: Ecological, Depositional and Taphonomic Variations on the Northern Luiche River Platform Students: Oceana S. Castañeda (Dartmouth College) Christine S. O’Connell (Stanford University) Mentors: Ellinor Michel and Mike Soreghan Introduction Shell gravel deposits represent geologic facies that persist into deep time as well as unique modern ecological habitats (Kidwell, 1986). Lake Tanganyika, East Africa, is home to numerous distinct facies and habitat types and provides a potential model system for understanding shell beds on a wider scale. In this ancient rift lake shell gravel occurs along axial, hinged and accommodation zone margins and seems to be particularly extensive near the mouths of relatively large rivers (Soreghan and Cohen, 1996). In the Kigoma region shell beds exist both on high-energy headlands and also blanketing the low-energy Luiche River delta platform (McGlue, et. al, 2005). However, little is understood about the mechanism by which these deposits may have formed. Examination of the northern Luiche River delta’s shell gravel has the potential to suggest a formation mechanism for these shell lags. Lake Tanganyika houses a robust sedimentary record that can be used to understand past changes in paleoenvironmental dynamics, land use and lake chemistry. However, accurate interpretation of the sedimentation record depends directly on an accurate understanding and interpretation of modern sedimentation patterns and mechanisms. The first step in understanding the depositional mechanism for the Luiche delta shell beds is to determine the source of the shell material. Lake Tanganyika’s shell beds consist primarily of the bivalve genus Caelatura and the endemic gastropod species Neothauma tanganyicense, both of which are poorly understood ecologically.
    [Show full text]
  • 1471-2148-7-7.Pdf
    BMC Evolutionary Biology BioMed Central Research article Open Access Reticulate phylogeny of gastropod-shell-breeding cichlids from Lake Tanganyika – the result of repeated introgressive hybridization Stephan Koblmüller1, Nina Duftner2, Kristina M Sefc1, Mitsuto Aibara3, Martina Stipacek1, Michel Blanc1, Bernd Egger1 and Christian Sturmbauer*1 Address: 1Department of Zoology, University of Graz, Universitätsplatz 2, 8010 Graz, Austria, 2Section of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin,1 University Station, #C0930, Austin, TX 78712, USA and 3Graduate School of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, B21-4259, Nagatsuta-cho, Midori-ku, Yokohama 226-8501, Japan Email: Stephan Koblmüller - [email protected]; Nina Duftner - [email protected]; Kristina M Sefc - [email protected]; Mitsuto Aibara - [email protected]; Martina Stipacek - [email protected]; Michel Blanc - [email protected]; Bernd Egger - [email protected]; Christian Sturmbauer* - [email protected] * Corresponding author Published: 25 January 2007 Received: 12 October 2006 Accepted: 25 January 2007 BMC Evolutionary Biology 2007, 7:7 doi:10.1186/1471-2148-7-7 This article is available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/7/7 © 2007 Koblmüller et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Background: The tribe Lamprologini is the major substrate breeding lineage of Lake Tanganyika's cichlid species flock. Among several different life history strategies found in lamprologines, the adaptation to live and breed in empty gastropod shells is probably the most peculiar.
    [Show full text]
  • Tanzania Has Tanzania Played a Key Support Role for Our Project Since Day 1
    “The Power Africa team in Tanzania has Tanzania played a key support role for our project since Day 1. From making introductions Population: 57.31 million to providing technical expertise they GDP Growth (2017): 7% have been reliable and valuable GDP/Cap (PPP): $879 partners for our business.” Tom Ease of Doing Business: 137 Carnahan. Owner, Wind Capital Group ENERGY SECTOR OVERVIEW Tanzania is the sixth-most populous country in sub-Saharan Africa; it connects six land-locked countries to the Indian Ocean; and, with the announcement of natural gas reserves, it presents opportunities for investment. Tanzania has abundant and world-class wind and solar resources. The Government of Tanzania (GOT) has committed to reform the operations of TANESCO (the national utility), and meet new demand through low-cost solutions. High reliance on expensive thermal and emergency generation sources have helped make the sector financially unviable. Tanzania has made progress in grid expansion, increasing generation capacity with natural gas, facilitating an enabling environment for solar home systems, and publishing of new standard Power Purchase Agreement for small producers 2017; but more progress is needed to provide adequate and reliable electricity. GENERATION CAPACITY CONNECTIONS Installed Capacity: 1,504 MW Current Access Rate: 32.7% . Hydroelectric: 568 MW . Thermal: 925 MW Households without Power: 7.7 . Other Renewables: 82.4 MW million . Target: Universal access by Power Africa New MW to date 2030 . Reached Financial Close: 162.5 MW Power Africa New Off-Grid Connections: 2.26 million Power Africa 2030 Pipeline 2,302 MW INVESTMENT AND ENABLING ENVIRONMENT Biggest Issues and Bottlenecks Power Africa Interventions 1.
    [Show full text]