DOCSLIB.ORG

Delegation to the EU-Kazakhstan, EU-Kyrgyzstan, EU-Uzbekistan And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Delegation to the EU-Kazakhstan, EU-Kyrgyzstan, EU-Uzbekistan And Delegation to the EU-Kazakhstan, EU-Kyrgyzstan, EU- List of members Uzbekistan and EU-Tajikistan Parliamentary Cooperation Committees and for relations with Turkmenistan and Mongolia Members Iveta GRIGULE Chair Group of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe Latvia Zaļo un Zemnieku savienība Gabrielius LANDSBERGIS Vice-Chair Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Lithuania Tėvynės sąjunga-Lietuvos krikščionys demokratai Tatjana ŽDANOKA Vice-Chair Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance Latvia Latvijas Krievu savienība Brando BENIFEI Member Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament Italy Partito Democratico Mady DELVAUX Member Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament Luxembourg Parti ouvrier socialiste luxembourgeois Herbert DORFMANN Member Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Italy Südtiroler Volkspartei (Partito popolare sudtirolese) Ismail ERTUG Member Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament Germany Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands Adam GIEREK Member Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament Poland Unia Pracy 06/04/2016 1 Jarosław KALINOWSKI Member Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Poland Polskie Stronnictwo Ludowe Kostadinka KUNEVA Member Confederal Group of the European United Left - Nordic Green Left Greece Coalition of the Radical Left Jean-Marie LE PEN Member Non-attached Members France Front national Urmas PAET Member Group of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe Estonia Eesti Reformierakond Markus PIEPER Member Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Germany Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands Pavel POC Member Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament Czech Republic Česká strana sociálně demokratická Emil RADEV Member Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Bulgaria Citizens for European Development of Bulgaria György SCHÖPFLIN Member Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Hungary Fidesz-Magyar Polgári Szövetség-Keresztény Demokrata Néppárt Helga STEVENS Member European Conservatives and Reformists Group Belgium Nieuw-Vlaamse Alliantie Viktor USPASKICH Member Group of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe Lithuania Darbo partija Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI Member European Conservatives and Reformists Group Poland Prawo i Sprawiedliwość 06/04/2016 2 Substitutes Alberto CIRIO Substitute Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Italy Forza Italia Ryszard CZARNECKI Substitute European Conservatives and Reformists Group Poland Prawo i Sprawiedliwość Marielle de SARNEZ Substitute Group of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe France Mouvement Démocrate Jussi HALLA-AHO Substitute European Conservatives and Reformists Group Finland Perussuomalaiset Jaromír KOHLÍČEK Substitute Confederal Group of the European United Left - Nordic Green Left Czech Republic Komunistická strana Čech a Moravy Marju LAURISTIN Substitute Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament Estonia Sotsiaaldemokraatlik Erakond Jeroen LENAERS Substitute Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Netherlands Christen Democratisch Appèl Andrejs MAMIKINS Substitute Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament Latvia "Saskaņa" sociāldemokrātiskā partija Fulvio MARTUSCIELLO Substitute Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Italy Forza Italia Ulrike MÜLLER Substitute Group of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe Germany Freie Wähler Marc TARABELLA Substitute Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament Belgium Parti Socialiste 06/04/2016 3 Inese VAIDERE Substitute Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Latvia Partija "VIENOTĪBA" Daniele VIOTTI Substitute Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament Italy Partito Democratico Hermann WINKLER Substitute Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Germany Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands Sotirios ZARIANOPOULOS Substitute Non-attached Members Greece Communist Party of Greece Joachim ZELLER Substitute Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Germany Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands Source : © European Union, 2016 - EP 06/04/2016 4.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FRANCE: a HOTBED of OPPOSITION to the TTIP? Elvire Fabry | Senior Research Fellow at the Jacques Delors Institute
    POLICY PAPER 136 10 JUNE 2015 FRANCE: A HOTBED OF OPPOSITION TO THE TTIP? Elvire Fabry | senior research fellow at the Jacques Delors Institute SUMMARY Two years after the start of negotiations for the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) in July 2013, the evolution of French public opinion is intriguing. THE EVOLUTION OF FRENCH PUBLIC OPINION It was expected that opposition to TTIP would come primarily from France, IS INTRIGUING” where public opinion is traditionally wary of trade liberalisation. But in November 2014, when 59% of Europeans and 25 of 28 member states said they were in favour of TTIP, 50% of French held a favourable opinion while the Germans had become the leading opponents of TTIP. The shift in German public opinion in spring 2014 had not been anticipated, considering that the German econ- omy has turned towards exports and that the German government itself was active in supporting the launch of negotiations. Public debate over TTIP has only truly manifested in France during the European election campaigns of May 2014, when the minor parties opposed to negotiations put the spotlight on the sanitary, phytosanitary, and environmental issues of the negotiations. The two major political groups adopted a more cautious and even evasive approach, waiting until autumn 2014 to clearly state their positions. In summer 2014, meanwhile, the inclusion of a mechanism to resolve disputes between investor and state has imposed itself as a source of more mobilising fears and has united a cross-partisan opposition which has con- tributed to growing doubts over the benefits of the agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • What You Should Know About Covid-19
    N°74/March 2021 EPFMA BULLETIN European Parliament Former Members Association www.formermembers.eu WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT COVID-19 Current Affairs FMA Activities “A new chapter in transatlantic Together for the relations” by Josep Future of Europe Borrell Fontelles Page 05 Page 30 2 FMA BULLETIN 74 - MARCH 2021 IN THIS ISSUE 03 Message from the President FOCUS 31 Former members network 04 EP at work 12 Europe’s Recovery Plan 32 EP to Campus Programme (Elisa Ferreira) 35 Book Review CURRENT AFFAIRS 14 Economic Consequences through COVID 19 05 A new chapter in and the Recovery Plan transatlantic relations (Ivailo Kalfin) LATEST NEWS (Josep Borrell Fontelles) 16 Drug landscape for 37 Activities 06 U.S. election result: a glimmer severe COVID-19 disease 39 In memoriam of hope ... (Zita Gurmai) (Prof. Flavia Franconi) 07 There is no strength without 18 Psychological explanations unity (Brian Crowley) and consequences (Nadja Hirsch) 08 How Brexit happened (Edward McMillan-Scott) 20 Nutrition and COVID-19 (Dr Carlos Enrique Rodríguez 09 AI could be what we want it Jiménez) Safer Internet Day (9 February to be (Zofija Mazej Kukovič) 22 Overview of the Pandemic 2021) was a call to action to contribute to a safer and (Prof. Isabella De Martini) 10 Europe 2020, a better internet, especially renewed momentum Quarantine on Syros Island for its youngest users, to be (Michel-Ange Scarbonchi) 24 (Anna Karamanou) prepared to handle digital technologies responsibly, FMA ACTIVITIES respectfully, critically and creatively. 26 Together for the Future of Europe CALL FOR CONTRIBUTIONS: The Editorial Board would like to thank all those members who took the time to contribute to this issue of the FMA Bulletin.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes and Continuities in the Formation of the 2017 French Government
    Fr Polit (2017) 15:340–359 DOI 10.1057/s41253-017-0042-9 ORIGINAL ARTICLE A mould-breaking cabinet? Changes and continuities in the formation of the 2017 French government Cristina Bucur1 Published online: 1 August 2017 Ó Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2017 Abstract Emmanuel Macron’s election as President of the Republic and the for- mation of a government that includes a mix of politicians from parties on the left and right of the political spectrum, as well as a significant share of non-partisan ministers, has been hailed by numerous commentators as an unprecedented overhaul of France’s political life. This article examines how the two cabinets formed under prime minister E´ douard Philippe in the shadow of the 2017 presidential and par- liamentary elections compare to previous governments in the Fifth Republic. The analysis reveals a less than revolutionary break with previous patterns of govern- ment size, channels of ministerial recruitment, portfolio allocation, gender balance, and ethnic diversity. Keywords France Á Cabinet Á Ministers Á Political parties Á Gender Á Ethnic diversity The president and the prime minister appointment The Constitution of the Fifth Republic places the president at the centre of the government formation process. Article 8 grants the head of state unconstrained power to select the prime minister and to appoint all other cabinet members on his or her proposal. Thus, favourable circumstances, such as the support of a majority in parliament, allow the head of state to appoint a loyal and/or at least subordinate prime minister and take control over the government (Elgie 2013: 20).
    [Show full text]
  • Le Monde.Fr : Rébellion En Fanfare Chez Les Gendarmes D'issy 256/09/Thursday 09H23
    Le Monde.fr : Rébellion en fanfare chez les gendarmes d'Issy 256/09/Thursday 09h23 Identifiez-vous Recherchez depuis email 1 mois Mot de passe France et Société sur Le Monde.fr ••• » Recevez les newsletters » Abonnez-vous au journal gratuites Le Monde : 16€/mois mémorisez | oublié? Jeudi 13 septembre 2007 Rébellion en fanfare chez les gendarmes d'Issy LE MONDE POUR MATINPLUS | 13.09.07 | 08h59 • Mis à jour le 13.09.07 | 09h02 Réagissez aux articles que vous venez de lire. Abonnez-vous au Monde.fr : 6€ par mois + 30 jours offerts Parmi les articles précédents ingt-deux musiciens de la gendarmerie mobile ont été mis aux arrêts. Ils ont refusé de Les faits Des "gendarmes en colère" expriment leurs déménager du fort d'Issy-les-Moulineaux (Hauts-de-Seine) à la caserne de Maisons-Alfort griefs sur Internet 23.03.07 € (Val-de-Marne). Raison invoquée : elle serait insalubre et amiantée. Les faits Un officier de gendarmerie tué lors de Tout commence en septembre 2006, lorsque les 78 gendarmes que compte la musique de la l'interpellation de cambrioleurs 25.06.07 € gendarmerie mobile, logés au fort d'Issy avec leurs familles, sont prévenus qu'ils vont être Les faits A Malakoff, un gendarme tue son adjudant, transférés à Maisons-Alfort. Le 23 avril, ils reçoivent leur ordre de mutation, pour un ses propres enfants puis se donne la mort 13.07.07 € emménagement le 30 juin. Mais entre-temps, une visite de leurs futurs appartements a fait l'effet d'une douche froide aux familles. D'après les témoignages, les sols et les plafonds sont dégradés, les plinthes arrachées, des fuites d'eau, des moisissures sont signalées.
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Policy Audit: Ukraine-France 1
    uniter Leonid Litra Florent Parmentier Cyrille Bret Anastasiya Shapochkina FOREIGN POLICY AUDIT: UKRAINE- FRANCE DISCUSSION PAPER Кyiv 2016 uniter CONTENTS 1. Introduction 4 This report was conducted within the project of the Institute of World Policy “Ukraine’s 2. Ukraine’s Interests in France and French Foreign Policy Audit”. This project is implemented with the support of the Black Sea Trust Interests in Ukraine: Possible Conversion Points 8 for Regional Cooperation of German Marshall Fund (BST GMF) and Ukraine National 2.1. France as a Mediator: an auxiliary actor 8 Initiatives to Enhance Reforms (UNITER) program, which is funded by the United States 2.2. French Investors, Economic Actors Agency for International Development (USAID) and implemented by Pact Inc. 12 2.3. The French interest and participation The contents are those of the Institute of World Policy and do not necessarily reflect in the promotion of reforms in Ukraine 18 the views of GMF, USAID, Pact Inc., and the United States Government. No part of 3. Existing and Potential Risks and Conflicts 21 this research may be reproduced or transferred in any form or by any means, graphic, electronic, or including photocopying or by any information storage retrieval system, 4. Who is Who? Interest Groups in France and Ukraine 33 without the proper reference to the original source. 5. Recommendations 41 6. Acknowledgements 43 Photos: Presidential Administration, the Embassy of Ukraine in France Authors: Leonid Litra Florent Parmentier Cyrille Bret Anastasiya Shapochkina Editor and project coordinator: Kateryna Zarembo © 2016, Institute of World Policy uniter CONTENTS 1. Introduction 4 This report was conducted within the project of the Institute of World Policy “Ukraine’s 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Bilan D'activité De La Commission Des Affaires Étrangères
    Bilan d’activité de la commission des Affaires étrangères Juillet 2017 – Juillet 2018 Table des matières Le mot de la présidente .............................................................................................................. 3 La commission des Affaires étrangères...................................................................................... 4 Les compétences de la commission des Affaires étrangères .................................................. 5 Les membres de la commission des Affaires étrangères ........................................................ 6 Le bureau de la commission des Affaires étrangères ............................................................. 7 Les coordonnateurs de la commission des Affaires étrangères .............................................. 8 Le secrétariat administratif de la commission des Affaires étrangères .................................. 9 L'activité législative de la commission des Affaires étrangères ............................................... 10 Les conventions et traités internationaux ............................................................................. 12 Les rapports pour avis sur les projets de loi ......................................................................... 15 Le projet de loi relatif à la programmation militaire pour les années 2019 à 2025 portant diverses dispositions intéressant la défense ..................................................................... 15 Le projet de loi pour une immigration maîtrisée et un droit d’asile effectif
    [Show full text]
  • Bilan D'activité De La Commission Des Affaires Étrangères
    Bilan d’activité de la commission des Affaires étrangères Septembre 2019 – Septembre 2020 1 Table des matières Présentation .............................................................................................................................. 3 La commission des Affaires étrangères .................................................................................. 5 Les compétences ...................................................................................................................... 6 Les membres ............................................................................................................................ 7 Hommage à Claude Goasguen (1945 – 2020) ............................................................................. 8 Les groupes .............................................................................................................................. 9 Le Bureau ............................................................................................................................... 10 Les coordonnateurs ................................................................................................................ 11 Le secrétariat administratif ..................................................................................................... 12 L’activité législative de la commission des Affaires étrangères ......................................... 13 L’examen des conventions et traités internationaux ................................................................ 14 Les avis
    [Show full text]
  • Bilan D'activité De La Commission Des Affaires Étrangères
    Bilan d’activité de la commission des Affaires étrangères Septembre 2018 – Juillet 2019 Table des matières Le mot de la présidente ............................................................................................................ 3 La commission des Affaires étrangères .................................................................................. 4 Les compétences ...................................................................................................................... 5 Les membres ............................................................................................................................ 6 Le Bureau ................................................................................................................................. 8 Les coordonnateurs .................................................................................................................. 9 Le secrétariat administratif ..................................................................................................... 10 L’activité législative de la commission des Affaires étrangères ......................................... 11 L’examen des conventions et traités internationaux ................................................................ 12 Le projet de loi autorisant la ratification de l’accord économique et commercial global et de l’accord de partenariat stratégique entre l’Union européenne et le Canada ............................. 15 Les avis sur les projets de loi ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Running the Presidency of the Council of the European Union’
    MEMBERS OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA EXECUTIVE GOVERNMENTAL SEMINAR ‘RUNNING THE PRESIDENCY OF THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION’ 2nd – 5th of September 2019, Zagreb Holding the Presidency of the Council of the European Union presents an important political and legal responsibility. It is also a unique opportunity to promote one’s country image within the Union. This Governmental Seminar is organized in the anticipation of the Croatian Presidency (1st semester 2020). It aims at opening a space for debate and experience-sharing on what maKes a successful Presidency from the political, technical, negotiation and communication perspectives. SUMMARY PROGRAMME Opening session Monday 2nd of September Venue: Seat of the Government of Opening speech and introductory (8.30-9.25) the Republic of Croatia remarks Address: 2 St Mark's Square Plenary session Monday 2nd of September Venue: Seat of the Government of ‘Running the Presidency of the (9.30-13.15) the Republic of Croatia Council of the EU: Implications for Croatia from the Political, Technical Address: 2 St Mark's Square and Communication Perspectives’ Coaching sessions Monday 2nd of September Upon registration ‘Communication and Negotiation (14.00-18.15) Challenges and Strategies in the & Venue: Ministry of Foreign and Particular Context of the Presidency Tuesday 3rd – Thursday 5th European Affairs of the Republic of of the Council of the EU’ of September Croatia (8.00–20.00) Address: 4 Đorđićeva Street SEMINAR PROGRAMME GOVERNMENTAL SEMINAR: MONDAY, 2ND OF SEPTEMBER u OPENING SESSION 8.30-9.00 Ministers’ arrival Welcoming coffee 9.00-9.15 Opening speech by Mr Zvonimir FRKA-PETEŠIĆ, Head of the Prime Minister’s Office 9.15- 9.25 Introductory remarks by Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • A Mould-Breaking Cabinet? Changes and Continuities in the Formation of the 2017 French Government
    A mould-breaking cabinet? Changes and continuities in the formation of the 2017 French government Cristina Bucur University of Oslo [email protected] Abstract Emmanuel Macron’s election as President of the Republic and the formation of a government that includes a mix of politicians from parties on the left and right of the political spectrum, as well as a significant share of non-partisan ministers, has been hailed by numerous commentators as an unprecedented overhaul of France’s political life. This article examines how the two cabinets formed under prime minister Édouard Philippe in the shadow of the 2017 presidential and parliamentary elections compare to previous governments in the Fifth Republic. The analysis reveals a less than revolutionary break with previous patterns of government size, channels of ministerial recruitment, portfolio allocation, gender balance and ethnic diversity. 1 The president and the prime minister appointment The Constitution of the Fifth Republic places the president at the centre of the government formation process. Article 8 grants the head of state unconstrained power to select the prime minister and to appoint all other cabinet members on his or her proposal. Thus, favourable circumstances, such as the support of a majority in parliament, allow the head of state to appoint a loyal and/or at least subordinate prime minister and take control over the government (Elgie 2013: 20). Several other constitutional provisions increase the president’s authority over the executive decision-making process. For example, the right to chair cabinet meetings (under Article 9) allows the head of state to set the agenda and influence policy-making indirectly (Knapp and Wright 2006: 89).
    [Show full text]
  • Inta Pv(2014)0924 1
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2014 - 2019 Committee on International Trade INTA_PV(2014)0924_1 MINUTES Meeting of 24 September 2014, 9.00-12.30 and 15.00-18.30 BRUSSELS The meeting opened at 9:04 on Wednesday, 24 September 2014, with Bernd Lange (Chair) presiding. 1. Adoption of agenda INTA_OJ PE537.512v02-00 The agenda was adopted. 2. Chair’s announcements Chair informed Committee Members about recent developments in the application of the EU- Ukraine Association Agreement and the latest set of EU sanctions against Russia. In camera 3. State of Play of International Trade Negotiations INTA/8/01120 Exchange of views with Jean-Luc Demarty, Director General DG Trade, Commission Speakers: Jean-Luc Demarty, Bernd Lange, Tokia Saifi, Daniel Caspary, Ska Keller, Santiago Fisas Ayxela, Helmut Scholz, David Martin, Viviane Reding, Jan Zahradil, Yannick Jadot, Anne-Marie Mineur, Marietje Schaake, Emma McClarkin, Sorin Moisa, Marielle de Sarnez, Inmaculada Rodriguez-Piñero In camera 4. Exchange of views on the State of Play of the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement Speakers: Bernd Lange, Peter Balas, Ignacio Garcia Bercero, Gabrielius Landsbergis, Victor PV\1059047EN.doc PE539.479v02-00 EN United in diversity EN Bostinaru, Johannes van Baalen, Yannick Jadot, Marine Le Pen, Helmut Scholz, Rebecca Harms, Sorin Moisa, Salvatore Cicu, Olli Rehn, Artis Pabriks, Marielle de Sarnez, Jarosław Wałęsa, David Campbell Bannerman, Franz Obermayr Joint debate 5. Association Agreement between the EU and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Georgia, of the other part INTA/8/00388 *** 2014/0086(NLE) 09827/2014 – C8-0129/2014 Rapporteur Olli Rehn (ADLE) PA – PE537.345v01-00 for the opinion: Responsible: AFET – Andrejs Mamikins (S&D) Consideration of draft opinion 6.
    [Show full text]
  • European Democracy: What Are the Next Challenges?
    EUROPEAN DEMOCRACY: WHAT ARE THE NEXT CHALLENGES? June 26th 2017 – Paris |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| The "democratic deficit" of the European Union is a hackney 9h00 > 9h30 – Reception - coffee catch all term well known to the disdainers and skeptics of 9h30 > 9h45 – Opening Speech the European construction and as well to some promoters Enrico LETTA, President of the Jacques Delors Institute, Former Italian PM of more transparent and participatory EU, partisans of direct elections for all institutions or of simplification relations 9h45 > 10h30 - Keynote Speech “Democracy in Europe” between institutions. Marielle DE SARNEZ*, EU Affairs Minister At a time when the democratic fracture between the EU and Q&A with the public its peoples is being denounced as one of the main factors 10h30 > 12h00 – Quelle forme de gouvernement pour l’UE ? in the breakdown of the European project, it is necessary to José Maria BENEYTO*, CEU San Pablo shed full light on the debates surrounding many of the Roberto CASTALDI, Director of the CesUE Nuno PICARRA*, Nova Law School of Lisbon democratic features of this hybrid construction, which Konstanty A. WOJTASZCZYK*, Warsaw University sometimes struggles to be described as representative of and listening to its citizens. 12h00 > 13h30 – Lunch break Would the EU be more democratic with a directly elected 13h30 > 15h00 – national referenda & EU: a deadend ? European Commission President? Should
    [Show full text]