IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
STA'I'E OF OHIO ex rei., . Case No: 2013-1734 MEGAN SHANAN-BECK
Relator,
V.
JUDGE TRAC'IE, M. HU'V I'EA2.,
Respondent.
RESPONDENT'S MEMORANDUM IN OI'POSI't'ION TO RELATOR'S MOTION TO DISMISS
Judge T racie1d1:. Hunter Pro Se Respondent Representing Respondent in her Official Capacity Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas Juvenile Division 800 Broadway, 12th Floor Cinci»1ati, Ohio 45202 (513) 946-9212 Fax (513) 513-9216 I'Hunter(cx ji7.vcourt.hamilton-co.orL,
Jennifer L. Branch (0038893) Counsel for Judge Tracie M. Hunter in Her Individual Capacity Only G^'[2F-iARDS`I'E1N & BRANC}I Co. LPA 432 Walnut Street, Suite400 Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 (513) 621-9100 Fax: (513) 345-5543 Email: jbranchc gbiirnl.conz
r ^ ..- ._• -l, f.45^ /
tf i %
rat 1- ^r f^j v+, ^q .,__...:^... • olAef j MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION
This appeal arose as a result of the appellate court granting Relator's Complaint for a
Writ of Procedendo. Respondent, The Honorable Tracie M. 1=1-unter, was not defended in the
proceedings below. As a result, no defense was raised to Relator's Complaint. Respondent took
it upon herself to file pro se a notice of appeal in the case. Respondent is representing herself
prcr se in her official capacity.
LTnder Ohio Revised Code § 309.09, the Hamilton County Prosecutor's Office (the
"Prosecutor") was initially responsible to provide Respondent a legal defense. Due to conflicts,
the Prosecutor withdrew as counsel from the instant case. Revised Code § 305.14 provides for
additional or substitute counsel to be appointed by a county court of com.nion pleas. Two private
attorneys were appointed by the I-larnilton County Court of Common Pleas to represent
Respondent in various procedendo cases including the instant case. However, these appointed
counsel did not file an answer or otherre,sponsive pleadilig in this case. Thtis, the Court of
Appeals ruled without benefit of knowing Respondent's defense and legal arguments.
Respondent appealed because the writ was issued in error.
Relator has now moved to dismiss theiiIstant appeal on the groundsthat Respondent has
already issued a decision in accordance with the First District's order grantin.g procedendo.
Respoi-ident complied with the eotirt of appeal's order despite Respondenl's belief thedecision,s
were in error because Respondent believed that not complying could lead to a charge of contempt. Respondent's compliance does not moot the appeal because this Court can still issue effective relief by guidizlg the parties and the Hamilton County Juvenile Court in applying this
Court's time guidelines in this case and similar cases. More importantly, this Court's ru[ing in this appeal would clarify that the extraordinary remedy of a writ of procedeildo is inappropriate
2 when a court is overburdened by its caseload. As of the date of this filing, 18 complaints for 'All-it
of procedendo have been filed against Relator Judge Tracie Hunter.
A. The Hamilton County Juvenile Court is So Overburdened That a Writ of Procedendo is Not Appropriate
It is public knowledge that the Hamilton County Juvenile Court has the heaviest caseload
ofanv juvenile court in Ohio. According to the Ohio Supreme Court's 2012 Ohio Courts
Statistical Report, the Hamilton County Juvenile Court has the second highest population per
juvenile court judge: 401,000 people per judge. See Exhibit A at pp. 126-27. More concerning
is that thenumber of case terzninations per judge in Hamilton County is 14,382 each. Id. I'hat is
more than twice as high a number of cases terzninated per judge for any judge in ailv county in
Ohio. Id. This caseload causes the Hamilton County Juvenile Court to delegate more than
double the number of cases to magistrates of any other Ohio county. I(I. at 128-29. Litigants
before a rnagistrate have the right to move to set aside any order by a magistrate, or object to aiiv
decision by a magistrate. See Ohio R. Juv. P. 40(D). From May 25, 2012, to August 31, 2013,
the Hamiltort County Juvenile Court recorded 499 objection motions filed. Of these, 296 were i.n
cases assigned to Respondent Judge I-lunter, while only 203 were assigned to the other judge in
the court, Judge John Williains. &e Exhibit B. Respondent is the most overburdened juvenile
court judges in Ohio: she presides in a court that has twice as many cases per judge than any
other court; that has twice as many cases pending before magistrates and who has pending before her 60% of all objections filed in the court since she has been on the bench.
Procedeiido exists to prevent "undue delay" by ajudge. A judge overburdened by an enornious caseload cannot be said to be unduly delaying the resolution of cases. Over a fifteen month period, objections were filed 296 times in cases assigned to Respondent. Despite this burden, Respondent was able to issue decisions in seven of the cases for which petitions for procedendo were sought, causing the cases to be voluntarily dismissed by the Hainilton County
Public Defenders' Uffice. I "I'his method of piecemeal resolution prejudices litigants who are the
victims of systemic court delays but whose cases are passed over for decision in order to rule on
a case where a complaint for a writ of procedendo has been filed. Respondent has been forced to
deprioritize cases tvhich have been pending for longer periods or which have more pressing
issues in order to focus on cases in which the FIamilton County Public Defender has filed
procedendo petitions.
Additionally, the F-lamilton County Juvenile Court records on the Stlpreme Court's "Form
D" data on cases which are peilding beyond a specified time guideline after assignment to a
judge. This Coitrt's Instructions for Preparation All Report Forms state that these time
guidelines are "mandatoiy" and that the clock begins to run when a case is originally assigned to
the reportirig judge. Notably, Juvenile Court Judge John Williams has more cases penditlg
beyoy-ld time guidelines than 1Z.espondeilt, and yet no procedendo petitioz-is have been filed against
him, which allows him to decide his cases in an orderly fashion.
Form n- Number of Cases Pending Beyond Guidelines r------^______llate 2013 Jud ge Hunter Jud e V6'iIliams January 9595 - I22 ------February 74 71 ---E March 68 8L A iril 67 - 91 May 7 3 82 June 83 77 90 -^_ BS------July August 79 103 September 77 --i- - 92
See State Ex, re. J.K v. 1-lainter, Case No. C1300497 (filed Aug. 12, 2013); .State ex. rel. Z.F. v. Hunter, Case No. C1300498 (filed Aug. 12. 2013); State ex: rel. Q.O. v. Hunter, Case No. C1300499 (£'iled Aug. 12, 2013); Staze ex. rel. KlczrysaBenge v. Hunter, Case No. C1300500 (filed Aug. 12, 2013); States ex. rel. Klarysa Bengev. 7funter; Case No. C1300501 (filed Aug. 12, 2013); State ex. rel. Renee Kreisav. Hunter, Case No. C1300503 (filed Aug. 12, 2013); and State ex. re,l. Susan Zillizk v. Hurtter, Case No. C 1300508 (filed Aug. 12, 2013).
4 xSee Exhibit D.
Therefore, issuing the extraordinary writ of Procedendo is not appropriate in this case. A
writ of Procedelido is, "issued by a eourt of superior jurisdiction ordering a lower court to
proceed to judgment in a case." &e AerNills v. Cojnmon Pleas, 72 Ohio St.3d 461, 462, 650
N.E.2d. 899 (1995). Procedendo is war.ranted where the petitioner can demonstrate "a clear legal
right to require the court to proceed, a clear legal duty on the part of the court to proceed, and the
lack of an adequate remedy in the ordiziary course of the law." C:ulgan v. Collier, 135 Ohio St.
3d 436, 437, 2013-Ohio-1762, 988 N.E.2d 564 (citing S'herrills, 72 Ohio St.3d at 462). Such
relief as appropriate where "a court has reftised to enter judgnlent or has unnecessarily delayed
proceeding to judgment." Id. (citing Cranciall, Pheils & Wisniewski v. DeCessna, 73 Ohio St.3d
180, 184, 652N.E.2d 742 (1995)). Since the I3 ainilton Cotmty Juvenile Court has such a heavy
caseload, and Respondent Judge Hunter has the largest caseload of the two sitting j udges, these
facts alone explain any delay in ruling in this case, yet the Court of Appeals did not consider this
evidence when it issued its decision.
In total, eighteen writ cases have been filed against Respondent Judge Hunter. Seven of
the uTit cases filed against Respondent were voluntarily dismissed by the petitioner because
Respondent issued an order before the court of appeals granted the writ. The backlog of cases
Judge Hunter inlierited and iiow presides over reflects a systemic problem at the Han-lilton
County Juvenile Court. The Hamilton County Juvenile Court is among the most overburdened in the state, and Respondent the most overburdened in that court. This problem is properly addressed by the Ohio Suprenie Court Case Managelnent Section not by the Court of Appeals issuing extraordinary writs on ati ad hoc basis. As a result, this Court's Case Management
Section has taken steps to address the systeniic problem and has appointed retired Hamilton County Juvenile Court Judge Thomas Lipps to preside over "all cases in which Objections to
Magistrates' Decision are periding past the 120-day time guideline as of October 15, 2013 ...."
See Exhibit C. This Court's order applies to cases pending before both Judge Williams and
Judge Hunter. Case Management is the proper remedy, not a`vrit of procedendo. Respondent
requests that the motion to dismiss be denied so Respondent can bring these facts to this Court's
attention.
B. The Court of Appeals Misapplied Ohio Rule of Superintendence 40(A)
Because Respondent was not represented by counsel., as required by statzite, Relator's
allegations were uilanswered. The court of appeals issued a decision that _m:erely restated
Relators' unrebutted petition. This was essentially a default judgment issued through no fault of
Respondent's. The Court of Appeals did not conduct a thorough review of the legal issues in this
case because Respondent was not permitted a defense to explain what mitigating factors existed.
As a result, the court issued an unprecedented decision applied. Ohio Rules of Superintendence
40(A)(2-3) to create deadlines for rulizig on objections to magistrate's decisions - a decision that
is not based in this Court's Rules or case laNv.
1. Rules 40 (A)(2) and (A)(3) Do Not Apply to Rulings on Objections.
Very few decisions have used Rules 40(A)(2-3) as guidance in deteisnining wlxen a writ
of procedendo should issue. Rules 40(A)(2-3) state that:
(2) All cases submitted for tletersnination after a cotzrt trial shall be decided within ninety days from the date the case was submitted.
(3) All motions shall be ruled upon withiri one hundred twenty days from the date the motion was filed, except as otherwise noted on the report forms.
(enlphasis added). For example, in Culgan, the petitioner moved for relief in the trial court, claiming that an error related to his 2009 seiytencing justified his release from post-release control. 135 Ohio St. 3d at 436. The trial court judge did not rule on the motion within 120
days. 'hhe petitzoner sought writs of mandan-ius and procedendo in the court of appeals, which
dismissed, stating that the petitioner had an adequate rem.edy by appeal. Id. The petitioner
appealed to the Ohio Supreme Court, which held that Superintendence Rule 40(A)(3), which the
petitioner relied on for the 120-day standard, did not create a cause of action, but that
"procedendo and mandamus will lie when a trial court has refused to render, or unduly delayed
rendering, a judgnient." Id. at 437-38 (quoting Reynolds v. 13asinger, 99 Ohio St.3d 303, 2003-
Ol1io-3631, 791 N.E.2d 459).
This Court used Rule 40(A)(3) to "guide" it in determining whether decision on a motion
was unduly delayed. Id. at 438. Instead of endorsing a flat 120-day rule, this Court named
several other factors that would inform its determination of Lmdue delay:
For example, a judge may require longer than 120 days to rule on a motion for summary judgment in a complex case. Other factors that might delay a ruling are the need for further discovery, the possibility of settlement, and other motions pending in the case. &,e State ex rel. Duncan v. DeWeese, 5th Dist. No. 2011- CA-67, 2011-Ohio-5194, 2011 WL 4625370, ^i 4. This is not an exhaustive list; we cannot anticipate all the factors that might allow a court, acting within its proper discretion, to delay ruliilg on a motion past the 120 days commanded by the rule.
Three other cases discuss Rule 40(A)(3) in conjunction with a petition for procedendo.
In Dz-incan, which preceded Culgan, the petitioner requested the writ to coznpel a trial court to
rule on his motion for resentencing. 2011 WL 4625370 at * 1. Like Culgan, Duncan held that
Rule 40(A)(3)'s 120-day deadline did not create an enforceable riglit, and that the presuinption
of undue delay after 120 days was subject to factors such as "[tjhe need for discovery, the issues presented, the possibility of settlement, other motions pending in the case, and even other matters pending before the court ...." Icl. Further, "allowing litigants to enforce such a rigid rule risks depriving other litigants of due process, invites gamesnianship in litigation, and could fiustrate
tlie policy of decidirig cases on their merits and not on procedural technicalities." Id.
In Jamison v. Nficskinguna, the petitioner sought a writ of mandamus or procedendo
compelling a ruling on his motion for a new trial in the trial court. J<.tmison v. 1vuskirzgun2, 5th
Dist. Muskinburn No. CT2009-0001, 2009-Ohio-1482, 2009 WL 818957 at *1(March 25,
2009). The cotirt of appeals found that although. more than 120 days had elapsed since the date
of the motion, a. prior appeal filed by the petitioner had divested the trial court of jurisdiction for
several, months. See id, When the appeal was dismissed the trial court assumed jurisdiction over
the motion, but less than 120 days elapsed before Petitioner sought relief via procedendo. Id. at
*2. This caused the court to dismiss the petition as premature. Id.
Although only acting as guidar^ce; Rule 40(A)(3) has only been applied to motions that
were pending more tt-ian 120 days. 'I'here is no precedent for applying this framework in the
context of objections to magistrates' decisions. Rule 40(A)(3) only applies to "motions," and
Rule 40(A)(2) to "court trials." No Ohio court has applied Rule 40(A)(3) as guidance in a
procedendo actioti involving objections to a magistrate's decision until the court of appeals did
so in tlais and other procedendo cases against Respondent Judge Hunter. Additionally, no court
lias applied Rule 40(A)(2) to create a presun7ptive ninety-day deadline for decxsions after oral
arguments are heard on objections.
2. 'Y'he Court of Appeals Did Not Properly Apply Rule 40(A)
Even if Rule 40(A) applied in this case, the rule states that the guideline is 120 days,
"except as otherwise notedon the report forms." Report Forni F applies to rtiotions, however the
Hainilton County Juvenile Court does not complete Form Fs. Ham.ilton County Juvenile Court does coznplete Form Ds which states the guideline in a custody case, like this, is nine montlis. At
8 the time Relator filed the complaint for a writ on August 12, 2013, the time guideline of nine
months had not expired since the date of the oral argument on. November 20, 2012.
3. The Court of Appeals Did Not Consider Mitigating Factors
Respondent was unable to present the mitigating factors that weighed against issuiiig a
writ to rule on objections from a magistrate. The facts available to theCout-t of Appeals include
court records, which the court had access to, but did not take judicial notice of. One such record
is the docket sheet, called a"Journal Query" in the Hamilton County Juvenile Court. The
docket sheet for this case sliows that:
This custody case began in 2006. On April 23, 2012 the magistrate decided to award
peimanent custody to the Hanlilton County Jobs and Family Services ("JFS"). Objections were
filed on April 25, 2012 and May 4, 2012. On July 23, 2012 R.espondent held a hearing but it had
to be continued to October 29, 2012 in order to have the transcripts prepared. Before the
October 29, 2012 eleven transcripts were filed, which totaled 1,069 pages. Howevex, not all the
transcripts were prepared in time. The hearing was continued to November 20, 2012 before
which time four additional transcripts were filed. In total, Respondent had to read 15 transcripts,
totaling 1,414 pages. Oral argument was held on November 20, 2013.
However, before Respondent coiild rule, JFS filed a motion to reopen the case in order to
submit additional evidence. This motion was filed on .lune 12, 2013. A hearing on the motion
was scheduled before Respondent for August 13, 2013. The dav before the hearing, Relator filed its coniplaint for a writ. Relator filed before the 9 month guideline for ruling after oral argument ran and before the Respondent could rule on aFS's motion for additional evidence. On August
13, Respondent held the hearing on the motion for additional evidence, in which Relator participated. At no time did Relator inform the Court of Appeals that a motion for riew evidence
9 was peiiding, or that a hearing was set for August 13, 2013. The Court of Appeals, relying solely
on Relator's incomplete facts, granted the writ on Septenlber 18, 2013, a month after the final
hearing on the pending objections was held.
Had the Court of Appeals had all the facts before it, iilcluding the mitigating factors of
over 1,000 transcript pages that needed to be transcribed and read, oral argument beiiig delayed
uxitil after the transcripts were completed, the existence of the intervening motion to reopen, and
the press of other buszness before the court, the Court would have been able to apply the
nutigating factors and been able to find that there was no undue delay in Judge Hunter's rul.ing in
this case. In fact, a decision to the contrary would not serve justice in a future similar case. A
judge should be free to grant reasonable continua.nces; to allow parties time to read a transcript
before argument; and to have the parties the opportunity to submit additional evidence. This
flexibility allows the parties to be treated fairly and believe justice was served.
In the Hainilton County Juvenile Court many actions take place after the filing of an
objection to a magistrate's decision and before the Judge is able to rule on an objection: heariizg
oral arguments on objections, allowing time for litigants to file supplemental objections and
present additional oral arguments, waiting during interlocutory appeals which divest the court of jurisdiction, waiting for transcripts to be prepared from each hearing in the case (due to the lack
of court reporters), reading each transcript, and most importantly conscientiously perfoi-ining the
duty of the juvenile court judges to "undertake an independent review as to [any] objected matters," see Juv. R. 40(D)(4)(d). The court of appeals did not haveoccasion to consider any mitigating factors justifying a delay in the instant decision, whether systemic or specific to this case. For this reason, the motion should be denied and the appeal be allowed to proceed.
10 C. The Appeal is Not Moot
The standard for mootness is "when, during the pendency of an appeal, an event occurs
which precludes the granting of any effective relief even if error be found . . . ." .tlliller v. Ohio
:L)eP't of Coynnaerce, 10th Dist. Franklin No. 86AY-825, 1987 WL 14395 (July 23, 1987) (citing
A/finer v. Witt, 82 Ohio St. 237, 92 N.E. 21 (1910)). Effective relief is not precluded here
because vacating the court of appeal's order granting procedendo will avoid darnage to
Respondent's reputation, provide guidance to the parties including the Hamilton County Juvenile
Court on the time guidelines that apply when objection.s are pending in this and similar cases, and prevent future deprioritization of cases under the piecemeal approach pursued by Relator.
D. Conclusion
The court of appeals did not consider the systemic problems at the 1-ianiilton County
Juvenile Court, along with the specific issnes relevant to the underlying case. Respondent was precluded from putting on a defense due to the reftlsal of her statutorily mandated counsel to file an answer or other defensive documents. Respondent issued a decision in the underlying case to avoid being held in contempt by the court of appeals. This should not preclude an appeal on the merits. For these reasons, Respondent respectfully requests that Relator's motion to dismiss be denied.
Respectfully submitted, ell- 2;t , ^^ Juctbe T►-acie1VI. Hunter Pro Se Respondent Representing Respondent in her Official Capacity 1-la.milton County Court of Common Pleas Juvenile Division 800 Broadway, 12th Floor Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 (513) 946-9212
11 Fax (513) 513-9216 THunter^a juvcourt.harnilton-co or^-1
P 'iVIF O. ^ L. BRAiYCH (0038893) ounsel _^r Judge Tracie M. Hunter in Her Individual Capacity Only GERHARDS'I'EIN & BRANCH Co. I,13A 432 Walnut Street, Suite400 Cincim-iati, Ohio 45202 Telephone: (513) 621-91. 00 Fax: (513) 345-5543 Email: jbran.ch@gbfit•m.cozn
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing
Memorandum was sent by regular U.S. M_ail, postage prepaid, this 29th day of Novcmber, 2013, upon the following:
Nathan Bell Law Office of the Hamilton County Public Defender 230 East 9th Street, Thirci Floor Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 ^,",.^.__
nnifer Branch
12 ; ------
, _.._.:. .
. _. ;... _
... ^ ¢ ^ ^ ^ } JUVENILE DIVI SION
Exhibit A Courts of Coznmon Pleas - Juvenile Division Composite Report for the Entire State 201.2 > ° o o ^ ^ c Q ^, .^ = c o`^ ^o ^ "- ^'^ UO (V•^2 YK 0^ a v O +^•a M^^ \ c c\ a) 0 Q D Q c^O a T U Q ^ li 0 fl ^m ro 0 oN q .3 Q F E C z °' U w a_
BeginningCases Pending 14,190 of 4,937 Year 5,137 2,073 6,844 1,463 886 11,286 332 19,430 2,069 68,647
New Cases Filed 63,913 43,470 13,103 11,756 5,715 370 13,562 21,132 7,746 965 2,976 184.708 Transferr?d In, Reactivated or 14,768 3,313 5,189 2,275 1,213 1,848 17,868 39,767 2,874 210 10,090 99,415 Redesignated Cases
Total Cases 92,871 51,720 23,429 16,104 8,391 3,104 42,716 80,329 17,464 1,507 15,135 352,770 ------Cases Terminated By:
'1'rial by Judge 1,070 242 1,241 112 183 471 1,610 1,991 267 13 255 7,455
Trial by Magistrate 4,380 688 3,914 247 252 371 7,585 9,490 1,660 203 711 29,501
Disrr,issal by Party, 13,995 6,963 3,080 3,659 2,511 120 5,222 11,747 2,900 Judge or Prosecutor 150 1,113 51,460
Admission to Judge 10,377 5,939 2,350 1,746 1,295 208 2,324 3,768 1,078 81 360 29,526
Admission to 29 , Magistrate487 24,764 5,068 4,878 192 1,279 265 1,442 5,557 16,764 2,361 92,057
Certification or Waiver Granted 170 X X X X X X X X X X 170
Unavailability of Party 9,859 1,569 119 1,607 1,057 42 229 6,288 1,107 for Tria! 45 75 21,997
Transferred Out 4,715 5,008 720 557 34 209 970 283 681 25 69 13,271 Referred to Private X X X X X X 1 1 0 0 0 2
In.terlocutoryAppealor 211 68 64 28 0 9 81 141 Order 34 9 377 1,022
All Other Terminations 4,144 1,980 1,643 859 208 556 7,203 10,358 1,530 510 8,437 37,428
Total Terminations 78,408 47,221 18,199 13,693 6,819 2,251 30,782 60,831 11,618 1,228 12,839 283,889
Cases Pending End of Year 14,463 4,499 5,230 2,411 1,572 853 11,934 19,498 5.846 279 2,296 68,881 Time Guide!ine 6 3 3 3 6 9 9 12 3 6 X (Months) 12 Cases Pending End of Year Beyond Time 1,135 519 906 441 279 87 1,121 1,152 1,008 80 273 7,001 Guideline
Number of Informal 25 432 Cases (All Case Types)
"X" inrlicates data not applicable.
1.25 Courts of Common Pleas - Juveni]e Division Overall Caseloads 2012
New Filings, Transfers, ----- Population------Reactivations------Terminations----- Per Per Per 1,000 Per Per 1,000 Clearance County Judges Total Judge Total Judge Population Totat Judge Population i he;udges of the feilow;ng counties have ;uven; eur,sdiction exclusively Rate Butler 2 368,130 184,065 9;283 4,642 25 7,460 3,730 20 80% Cuyahoga 6 1,280,122 213,354 26,225 4,371 20 29,716 4,953 23 113% Erie 1 77,079 77,079 4,257 4,257 55 4,234 4.234 55 99% G_reene 1 161,573 161,573 3,115 3,115 19 3,t)43 3,043 19 98% ^Hamiiton 2 802,374 401,187 28,109 14,055 35 28,763 14,382 36 102°Ia^ Lake 1 230,041 230,041 3,128 3,128 14 3,153 3,153 14 101% Lucas 2 441,815 220,908 12,120 6,060 27 12,069 6,035 27 100% Mahoning 1 238,823 238,823 4,450 4,450 19 4,438 41438 19 100% Montgamery 2 535;153 267,577 14,975 7,488 - Richland 1 124,475 124,475 2,786 2,786 28 13,798 6,899 26 92% 22 2,821 2,821 23 101% Summit .1 541,781 541,781 7,831 7,831 147,799 7,799 Tne ji,dges cf the pr-obatefollowing jurisdictlon cqunfies also have 14 100°!0 Allen 1 106,331 106 , 331 3,430 3,430 32 3,211 3,211 30 94% Ashland 1 53,139 53,139 1,244 1,244 A.shtabula 1 23 1,254 1,254 24 101% 101,497 101,497 2,127 2,127 21 1,634 1,634 16 77% Athens 1 64,757 64,757 979 979 15 1,052 1,052 13 10l °o Belmont 1 70,400 70;400 1,608 1,608 23 1,593 1,593 Brown ^ 44,846 44,846 834 23 99oi° 834 19 862 862 19 103% Carroll 1 28.836 28,836 919 919 32 924 924 32 101% Clermont 1 197,363 197,363 5,886 5,886 30 5,907 5,907 100°i^ Clinton 30 1 42.040 42,040 1,108 1,108 26 1,082 1,082 Columbiana 1 107,841 107,841 2,418 2,418 26 98°0 22 2,285 21285 21 94% Coshocton 1 36,901 36,901 1,124 1,124 30 1,169 1,169 32 104% Crawford 1 43,784 43,784 1,045 1,045 24 1,026 1,026 Darke 1 52,959 52,959 946 946 18 925 - 23 98% Defiance 1 925 17 98% 39,037 39,037 630 630 16 652 652 17 103% Delaware 1 174,214 174,214 2,534 2,534 15 2,511 Fairfie,d 1 146,156 146,1`^6 1,744 2,511 14 99% 1,744 12 1,746 1,746 100% F-ayette 1 29,030 29,030 1,239 1,239 7 12 1GO^ro 43 1;2, 6 1,276 44 103% Fulton 1 42,698 42,698 882 882 21 904 904 21 102% Gallia 1 30,934 30,934 1,234 1,234 40 1,240 Geauga 1 93,389 93,389 3,814 1,240 40 100% 3,814 41 3,698 3,698 40 97% Guernsey 1 40,087 40,087 1,262 1,262 31 1,350 1.350 34 107% Ha:ncock 1 74.782 74,782 1,616 1,616 22 1,695 1,695 23 105% Hardin 1 32,058 32,058 816 816 25 856 Harrison. 1 856 27 105% 15,864 15,864 473 473 30 478 ;ighland 1 43,589 43,589 1,066 1,066 478 30 1p%°° 24 1,057 1,057 24 99% Hockin.g 1 29,380 29,380 925 925 31 909 909 31 98% Holmes 1 42,366 42,366 485 485 11 446 446 11 92% Huron _ 1 59,625 59,626 1,100 1,100 18 1.130 1,130 119 103% Jackson 1 33,225 33,225 _ 823 ^ 823 25 703 703 21 85% Jefferson 1 69,709 69,709 2,387 2,387 34 2,241 2,241 32 94% Knox 1 60,921 60,921 1,643 1,643 27 1,619 1,619 27 99% Lawrence 1 62,450 62,450 999 999 16 976 976 Licking 1 166,492 166,492 2,443 2,443 , 16 98% S 2,431 2,431 15 100% Madison 1 43,435 43,435 857 857 20 869 869 20 101% Medina 1 172,332 172,332 1,761 1,761 10 1,803 1,803 10 102% Meigs 23,770 23,770 1,154 1,154 49 1,072 1,072 45 93%
126 Courts of Commou Pleas -Juvenile Division Overall Caseloads 2012
New Filings, Transfers, ----- Popuiation------Reactivations------Terrninations>---- Per Per Per 1,000 Per Per 1;000 Clearance County Judges Totai Judge Total Judge Population Total Judge Population Rate Mercar 1 40,814 40,814 1,152 1,152 28 1,086 1,086 27 94% Miami 1 102,506 102,506 4,921 4,921 48 4,851 4,851 47 99% Monroe 1 14,642 14,642 226 226 15 259 259 18 1:15°0 Muskincdum 1 86,074 86,074 1,851 1,851 22 1,922 1,922 22 104°l0 Ottawa 1 41.428 41;4281,266 1,266 31 1,324 1,324 32 105oo Paulding 1 19,614 19,614 273 273 14 271 271 14 99% Perry 1 36,058 36,058 1,0531;053 29 1,067 1,067 30 101% Pickaway 1 55,698 55,698 1,440 1,440 26 1,454 1,454 26 101% Pike 1 28,709 28,709 772 772 27 773 773 27 100% Portage 1 161,419 161,419 2,321 2,321 14 2,305 2,305 14 99% Preble 1 42,270 42,270 1,169 1,169 28 1,241 1,241 29 106% Putnam 1 34,499 34,499 617 617 18 620 620 18 100% Ross 1 78,064 78,064 1,3231.323 17 1,353 1,353 17 102% Sandusky 1 60,944 60,944 2,681 2,681 44 2,835 2,835 47 106% Scioto 1 79,499 79,499 1,055 1,055 13 1,086 1,086 14 103% Seneca 1 56,745 56,745 1,644 1,644 29 1,727 1,727 30 105% Shelby 1 49,423 49,423 1,369 1,369 28 1,407 1,407 28 103% Tuscarawas 1 92,582 92,582 1,405 1,405 15 1,249 1,249 13 89% Jnion 1 52,300 52,300 1,448 1,448 28 1,418 1,418 27 98% Van Wert 1 28,744 28,744 911 911 32 861 861 30 95% Vinton 1 13,435 13,435 503 503 37 462 _ 462 34 92% Warren 1 212,693 212,693 4,607 4,607 22 5,000 5,000 24 109% Washington 1 61,778 61,778 1,085 1,085 18 1,094 1,094 18 iC1%a Wayne 1 114,520 114;520 2,744 2,744 24 2,753 2,753 24 100% Wiliiams 1 37,642 37,642 678 678 18 684 684 18 ^ 101 /n Wood 1 125,488 125488 3,179 3,179 25 3,135 3,135 25 99% The judges of the following count:es a!so have domestic reiations jurisdiction C!ark 1 1138.333 138,333 5,434 5,434 39 5,265 5,265 38 97% Franklin 5 1,163,414 232,683 34,117 6,823 29 33,977 6,795 29 100% Henry 1 28,215 28,215 778 778 28 781 781 28 100% Lorajn 3 301,356 100,452 9,535 3,178 32 9,421 3.140 31 99% Stark 3 375,586 125,195 6,487 2,162 17 5,866 1,955 16 90% 7'rumbull 2 210,312 105,156 4,939 2,470 23 5,123 2,562 24 104°,% The judges oP the folfcwing count,ies a!so have cJomestic relations and probate lurisd!ction Auglaize 1 45,949 45,949 682 682 15 702 702 15 103% Champaign 2 40,097 20,049 1,715 858 43 1,782 891 44 104% Logan 2 45,858 22,929 1,328 664 29 1,356 678 30 102% Marian 2 66,501 33,251 2,849 1,425 43 2,943 1,472 44 103% The jui.iges o` the foilowing counties also have genera, dcmestic relations> and probate jurisdiction Adams 1 28,550 28,550 814 814 29 760 760 27 93% Morgar, 1 15,054 15,054 470 470 31 372 372 25 79% 1"lorrow 2 34,827 17,414 680 340 20 666 333 19 98% Noble 1 14,645 14,645 252 252 17 242 242 17 0 96 lo Wyandot 1 22,615 22,615 516 516 23 516 516 23 100% Statewide 110 11,536,504 104,877 284,123 2,583 25 283,889 2,581 25 100%
,kll population datafrom 2010 U.S. Census.
127 Courts of Conianon Pleas - Juven.nile Division Overall Terminations 2012
0 a^ ^ n c ^°^m a s^= 7 -^ o oc oc County N ^ a ^ H ?ro ^ m :roac N ^ ucO s^ ^ o E ^ w. ^ 2 > c O o -F a ._ o -q ^^ ^ cD ro y ^ Q 0 ^ ^ E Q 4 ^ Q F The judges of tne followi!-ig counties have juvenfle Jurisdict on excEu=ively Futier 14 1,160 843 374 2,937 4 598 111 Cuyahoga 220 1,370 6,874 1,991 7,065 8 4,192 4,134 0 0 1,419 7,460 rrie 12 67 862 20 1,967 0 321 319 9 3,853 29,716 0 0 666 4,234 Greene 201 17348 276 15 855 0 36 291 0 0 21 3,043 Hamiiton 221 5,945 4,263 113 12,167 42 5;412 80 Lake 25 229 299 926 1,306 0 0 10 510 28,763 11 06 29 0 0 233 3,153 Lucas 78 2,866 2,979 171 2,630 16 11925 9 0 0 41.395 12,069 Mahoning 29 1,569 442 643 1,242 4 165 176 0 Montgomery 42 2,072 2,471 840 6,857 18 1,256 4, 0 0 168 4,438 Richiand 18 167 425 179 1,640 0 31 273 5 ^6 13,798 0 0 88 2,821 Summit 77 811 1,466 314 4,054 24 600 203 ; he iudgEs o' the fol!oaving counties also have probate jurisdiction 0 0 250 7,799 A(len 31 518 457 200 1,031 0 179 185 0 Ashland 200 189 93 0 610 3,211 378 138 0 55 123 0 0 Ashtabula 0 78 1,254 1 288 45 1,074 0 0 2 0 0 224 1,634 Athens 19 53 147 203 545 0 9 21 -^"-^ ----- __ _ _ 0 0 55 1,052 Belmont 55 222 308 541 224 0 0 44 0 0 199 1,593 Brown 1 0 89 594 91 0 15 67 0 0 5 Carroll 624 0 43 183 862 Clermont 29 411 1;201 347 1,741 0 7 43 0 0 24 924 0 31, 2 114 0 0 1,752 5,907 Clinton 55 10 167 154 604 0 14 68 0 Columbiana 67 156 364 234 1,362 0 10 1082 0 33 66 0 0 3 2,285 Coshocton 84 13 201 157 618 0 39 37 0 0 Crawford 2 0 79 331 492 20 1,169 _ 0 3 107 0 0 12 1,026 Darke 0 1 279 543 10 0 0 23 Defiance 2 0 181 306 79 0 0 83 0 0 69 925 Defaware 21 200 595 49 1,358 1 57 155 0 0 1 652 rairfiefd 283 12 139 _36 1,005 0 0 0 75 2,511 22 162 0 0 87 1,746 Fayette 568 1 128 333 2 0 1 42 Fultori 5 0 175 380 156 0 0 201 1,276 0 9 66 0 0 113 904 Gallia 63 333 329 401 0 0 0 40 0 0 74 Geauga 18 2 77 1.240 518 331 0 62 25 0 0 2,665 3,698 Guernsey 131 340 283 199 177 0 60 72 0 Hancock 13 282 198 423 619 0 88 1,350 3 24 120 0 0 i3 1,695 Hardin 0 G 243 326 202 0 29 53 0 HarYlson 163 169 24 58 0 0 0 15 0 0 3 856 0 49 478 Highland 603 0 210 172 0 0 39 15 0 0 18 1,057 Hocking 152 142 139 277 65 0 97 10 0 0 27 909 Holmes 30 4 81 205 0 0 0 53 0 Huron 98 14 153 585 0 73 446 80 0 31 116 0 0 53 1,130 Jackson 6 15 211 216 39 0 0 29 0 0 187 Jefferson 2 499 188 1,077 177 703 0 25 29 0 0 244 2,241 Knox 15 25 159 477 257 0 0 92 0 0 594 1,619 Lawrence 3 3 268 279 309 0 0 9 0 0 105 :.icking 1 183 161, 42 1,049 976 0 0 230 0 0 765 2.431
128 Courts of Conlrr.tozi Pleas - Juvenzle Division Overall Terminations 2012
o o a^ o > 2a) O.^. Q N N. (D 'a 0'- ^..0 County > N^ n y ^> c .2 ro y' v 0 °^ ro m E ^ `a;ny ^O ° om E £ L] a ^^ LU o ^ > ^ Q O t- Q < v Q. = d i 1'
Madison 53 0 112 193 328 0 1 131 0 0 51 869 Medina 10 57 211 68 1,095 0 13 140 0 0 209 1,803 Meigs 262 98 168 498 0 0 0 12 0 0 34 1,072 Mercer ------3 0 140 326- 0 0 10 54 0 0 553 1,086 Miami 234 1,311 579 224 1,172 1 141 110 - 0 0 11,079 4,851 Monroe 27 0 39 165 0 0 6 9 0 0 13 259 Muskingum 235 128 332 86 806 1 33 183 0 0 1318 1,922 Ottawa 12 28 269 638 122 0 153 95 0 0 7 1,324 Paulding 0 0 101 156 0 0 0 10 0 0 4 271 Perry 15 221 101 262 110 0 25 32 0 0 301 1,067 Pickaway 3 0 264 352 141 0 196 122 0 0 376 1,454 Pike 376 0 142 108 0 0 42 20 0 0 85 773 Portage 6 122 440 65 1;343 0 90 46 0 1 192 2,305 Prebie 24 184 138 374 171 0 10 24 0 0 316 1,241 Putnam 25 0 170 384 0 0 7 22 0 0 12 620 Ross 1 8 379 304 476 0 0 70 0 0 115 1,353 Sandusky 3 44 489 251 873 0 49 214 0 0 912 2,835 Scioto 130 45 201 59 525 0 32 24 0 0 70 1,086 Seneca 11 43 183 94 1,107 0 125 81 0 0 83 1,727 Shelby 16 6 296 646 289 1 16 111 0 0 26 1,407 Tuscarawas 37 0 131 478 484 1 9 106 0 0 3 1,249 Union 23 32 346 71 541 0 99 70 0 0 236 1,418 Van Wer` 37 174 137 233 156 0 2 106 0 0 16 861 Vinton 2 0 80 109 0 0 0 13 0 0 258 462 Warren 9 270 ^ 372 61 1,627 0 599 354 0 0 1,708 5.000 Washington 20 21 156 225 541 0 57 58 0 0 16 1,094 Wayne 32 48 303 689 1,288 0 92 233 0 0 68 2,753 Williarns 0 0 160 339 124 0 1 57 0 0 3 684 Nood 24 57 687 1,115 1,082 0 56 114 0 0 0 3,135 The judges of the foilowing countiesalso have dornestic re!ation5 jur'isdiction Cfark 186 1,484 1,501 658 1,019 2 217 175 0 0 23 5,265 Prankiin 209 1,999 7,587 468 11,439 37 1,852 852 1 994 8,539 31977 Henry 1 2 114 143 358 0 0 55 0 0 108 781 Loraln 155 126 3,554 1,132 2,390 7 1,623 275 1 0 158 9,421 Stark 412 1,150 1,125 434 2.202 0 165 131 0 1 246 5,866 Trumbuli 5 15 133 24 1;553 0 362 57 0 0 2;974 5,123 The j dges of tne foliowi,rg counties also have domesticrelations znd probate jursoiction 4ug(aize 17 0 42 526 0 0 5 109 0 0 3 702 Champaign 3 0 271 433 17 0 6 400 0 0 652 1,782 Logan 33 0 73 339 766 0 15 125 0 0 5 1,356 Maron 119 140 728 550876 0 87 129 0 0 314 2,943 The judges of the foi!owir.g counties also have geneal, domestic reiations, ar:d probafe jurisdicticn Adams 25 254 135 71 162 0 0 20 0 0 92 760 Morgan 255 1 32 0 0 0 3 9 0 2 70 372 Morrow 2 11 117 17 199 0 23 132 0 0 165 666 Noble 107 0 47 54 0 0 0 19 0 0 15 242 Wvandot 15 20 16 249 120 0 11 80 0 0 5 516
Statewide 7,455 29,501 51,460 v 29,526 92,057 170 21,997 13,271 2 1,022 37,428 283,889
Jryq Today ` s ra te HANIII.,TON cflUlm`TY JIJVEI4TILF C®U12^
Code Case Numher Magistrate Judicial CD Motior, Date ADLT F/13/000472 Adelmann, Laara z AuL'T F/13/000473 06/13/2013 15:09 Adelmanri, Laura z CUST F/92/000877 06/13/2013 14:46 Bolier--Koch, Kathryn z CUS'. F/96/002487 07/17/2013 11:43 Schulcz, Mary z CUST F/97/OOi.788 08/19/2013 13:38 Bouchard, Roger z CUST F/97/002137 06/15/2012 8:17 Schulez, Mar.y x CUST F/97/002437 11/09/2012 14:01 Murdock, Constance z CUST F/98/001756 03/08/2013 14:42 Murphy, Elisa Z CUST F/98I0-018S3 06/27/2012 14:46 Love, Ayanna z CUST r^./98/001883 03/07/2013 0:00 Love, Ayanna z C UST F/98/00-1883 03/04/2013 11:12 i.Ove, Avanna z CUST F/98/001833 11/27/2012 13:58 Love, Ayanna z CUST F/99/001897 11/27/2012 10:51 Sanders, Nico?e K CUST ='/99/002269 08/19/2013 0:00 Murphy, Elzsa ! CUST F/99/002269 01/07/2013 11:40 Coleman, John x i; US T F/99/ 002269 06/05/2012 10:37 Murphy, Elisa x CUST F/99/002535 02/11/2013 15:07 Love, Ayanna X CUST F/00/000510 04/19/2013 i2:42 Murdock, Constance X CUST F/01/000333 07/29/2013 11:44 Love, Ayalna X CUST F/01/001941 09/25/207.2 0;00 Ke.Zley, Gevid z CUST F/Oi/002324 07/30/2012 11:0^ Montgomer.y, David X CUST F/01/002334 06/27/2012 11t59 Montgomery, David X CUST F/01/0024J5 06/17/2012 0:00 Murrlock, Constance z CUST F/01/003531 01/07/2013 8:49 Demott, Paul Z CUS'" F'/02/000513 04/11/2013 9:12 Gray, Rob X CUST 09/04/2012 11:45 r^/02/0001423 Igoe, u;z CCrST 04/02/2013 14:22 F/02/00'272 Cross, Wande CUST F/02I001608 03/21/2013 11c26 F•Iatkins, Katherine X CUST 10/12/2012 14:15 Fi02/002181 Anthony, Brenda X CUST F/02/0021.81 03/19/2013 14:53 Anthony, Brenda X C UST F/02/00228? 03/13/2013 10:16 Milazzo, Charles X CUST F/02/0022F32 06/15/2012 13:53 Milazzo, Charles X CTJST F/Q3/000913 06/15/201-2 10:35 Luken, Susan Z CUST F/03/002136 03/27/2012 8:38 Milazzo, Charles z CUST F/03/00213E 10/09/2012 9:01 Milazzo, Charles z CUST P/03/002136 10/05/2012 11:02 Milazzo, Charles z CUST F/03/002136 10/16/2012 10:.43 Milazza, Charles z C Us'r F/0ti/000571 10/04/2012 8:27 Bouchard, Roger X CUST F/04/001454 02/15/2013 13:24 Love, Ayanna Z CUST F/04/OQ2166 10/30/2012 9:14 Resier, Mark X CUST F/04/C02180 04/30/2013 8:32 Murdock, Constance a F/04/002236 03/18i2013 14:42 -r7a.sh4 ngton, Scheherazade Z CUST F/04/002236 1-2/21/2012 6;13 Washing-ton, ScheY,erazade z CUST F104i002236 12/20/2012 8;53 Gtashingfion, Scheherazade z CUST F/05/001153 12/i8/2012 11:12 Love, Ayanna z C U:iT F/05/001757 06/01/2012 14;54 P4ilazzo, Charles x CUST F./05/001921 08/02/2012 15:44 Anthony, Brencla Z CUST F/05/001921 01/18/2013 12:52 Anthony, Brenda z CJS'T F;05/001921 01/22/2013 15:27 Anthory, Brenda z CUST F/05/001967 01/23/2013 10:37 Coleman, John X CUST 05/15/2013 8:59 F/05/002242 Anthony, Brenda CUST 01/07/20"^3 13:50 r/05/002242 Anthony, Brencia CUST Z 01/07/2013 14:26 F/06/000584 Milazzo, Charles z CUST F/06/001380 07/13/2012 10:43 Mont.gomery, Dav_d z CLiST F/06/001475 05/20/2013 11:31 Ke11e_y, Catherine CUST Y. F/06/001540 3 10/04/2012 14:27 Cross, 7ende Z C?J S T F/06/001704 08/30/M1311t40 3cYiulcz, Mary CUST x 01/28;2013 15:17 F/07/001624 Kelley, David z CUST F/07/001658 04/23/2013 8:01 Washington, Scheherazade z CUST F/07/001658 04/04/2013 8:27 Ldashi:gton, Scheherazade CUST F/07/002494 04/15/2013 8:57 ^urdock, Constance CUST F/07/002537 04/22/2013 8:56 Ke21.ey, Cather;.ne z COST 01/10/2013 11:31 F/08/000418 Y•,elley, Dav^d CUST X 07/03/2013 10033 B'/08/000418 Kelley, David CUST X 10/09/2012 12:44 F/08/000544 Montgomery, i7avid CUS"' 05/20/2013 14:20 F/08/001204 Kelley, David CUST 05/2Q/2013 9:24 F108/001432 Schulcz, Mary CUST 04/25/2013 8:18 F/08/001463 Kelley, Catherine CUST 06/0512012 15:53 r/08/003506 Schu,Lcz, Mary 10/31/2012 8:45 Exhibit B Today's9/9/2013 pate HAIN^1ZJC,TON CC}YT^iTY J'UVENTLE JCMR954 COUR'I' F'age 2 LOBTECTION MOTIONS FILED FROM 05/25/201.2 to 08/31/2013 Case Code Case Number Magistrate Judicial CD '?otion Date CUST F/O8/001506 Schulcz, Mary z CU£,^T F/08/001677 06/27/2013 14:51 Webb, Donald z CUST F/08/001868 06/05/2012 12:21 Watkins, iCatherine z CUST F/08/001858 06/26/2012 14:52 Watkins, Katherine z CUST =/08/002019 01/08/2013 1i:39 Sanders, Nico].e `l. CUST F/08/002051 08/29/2013 11:10 Washington, Scheherazade z CUS'_ F/08/002249 11/14/2012 10:54 Ke.iley, David 2 CUST F/O8/002385 07/06/2012 12:21 At:thony, Brenda x CUST F/09/000186 04/23/2013 10:51 Love, Ayanna Z C U S T F/09/000i86 05/02/2013 15:10 Love, Avanna Z CUST F/09/000186 04/23/2013 12:43 Love, Ayanna Z CUST k'/09/000385 04/16/2013 12:.34 Kelley, David X CUST F/09/001178 01/22/2013 13:23 Murphy, Elisa 2 CUST F/09/001178 07/10/2012 10:02 Murphy, Elisa z CUST F/09/001223 07/11/2012 11:29 Watkins, KatherIne Z CUST 10/17/2012 15:39 F/09/001349 Demott, Pau;.. CUST x 02/26/2013 9:00 :/09/001349 Demott, Paul x CUST F/09/001456 02/26/2013 13:36 Resler, Mark x GUfi T F/09/001473 05/10/2013 15:47 Houchard, Roqer x CUST F/09/0Q1642 07/23/20i3 10:26 Luken, Susan 2 CUST F/09/001692 06/21/2012 11:25 Falter, Karen X CUST F/09%001692 07/17/2012 8:49 Cemott, Paul X CUST 02/28/2013 13:45 F/09/001692 Demctt, Paul 3{ CL'ST F/09/001692 07/02/2013 9:52 Demott, Paul X CUST F/09/0p1765 03/13/2013 11:30 Demot" Paul z CUST F/09/001784 09/ 12/207.2 8:11 Adelmann, Laura X CUST F/09/002077 04/04/2013 10:56 Love, Ayanna X CUST F/09/OG2351 09/24/2012 12:24 Coleman, John 2 C3ST F/09/002351 06/27/2013 9:27 Colemari, John z CL'ST F/09/002368 06/27/2013 9:26 Love, Ayanna Z CUST F/09/002368 =0/24/2012 10:07 Love, Avanna Z CJST 10/24/2012 13:38 F/09/002368 Love, Ayanna CUST F,/10/000078 10/29/20%2 11:44 Falter, Karer, X CUST 09/20/2012 15:48 F/10/000564 SCi1;j1CZ, Mary x CUST 07/23/2013 14:54 F/10/000930 Murphy, Elisa CUST F/10/001144 02/22/2013 13:46 NJashington, Scheherazade z CUST F/10/001418 11/21/2012 10:42 ?goe, Liz X CUST F/10/001590 08/09/2u^12 15:29 Bouchard, Roger X CUST 03/18/2013 13:42 F/10/007:620 lgoe, Liz CUST F/10/0G2243 07/09/2013 12:02 Kelley, David X CUST F/10/002234 04/03/2013 15:04 Anthony, Brenda Z C U S'i'. P/10/002347 10/26/2012 12:58 Igoe, Liz z C,U'i T F/11/00-0072 1-0/26/2012 9:08 Mont.go:nery, David Z CUST F/11/000151 07/24/2013 10:.40 Watkins, Katherine 4 CUST 12/06/2012 14:19 F/11/000222 Kelley, David x CUST F/11/000997 11/28/2012 11:02 Schulcz, Mary 2 CT.iST 09/29/2013 13:52 F/11/001485 Murphy, E.iisa x CUST F/11/001502 09/25/2012 9:57 Montgomery, David CUST F/11/001502 11/27/2012 11:18 Montgomery, David CUST 10/26/2012 11:06 F/11/001719 Kelley, David CUST 01/18/201316:03 F/i1/001763 Schuicz, +1asy CUST 11/20/2012 12:22 F/11/0Oi893 Coleman, John CiJST 07/24/2013 13:41 F/il/001977 Holtmeier, Denis CUST 08/28/2012 11:54 F/11/002189 Keiley, Cather.ine CUST F/11/002534 04/02/2013 13:09 Montgomery, Dav..c. X CUST F/11/002681 05/28/2013 11:22 Schulcz, Mary x CUST F/12/000022 02/04/2013 14:44 3olier-Koch, Kathryn 2 CUSa F/12/000022 05/03/2013 15:45 So11er--Koch, Kathryn Z CUST F%12/000022 07/15/2013 72:16 Boiler--Koch, Kathryn z CUST F,/12/000022 07/15/2013 12:19 Bo1ler-Koch, Kathryn z CUST F/12/000022 07/12/2013 10:56 Kelley, David z CUST 'r/12/000174 03/01/2013 12:11 Kelley, Da.vi.d X CUST F/12/000248 07/30/2012 13:03 Murdock, Constance X CUST F/i2/000y38 02/08/2013 14:08 Iioltmei:er, Denis x CUST F/12/001059 09/16/2012 15:19 Murphy, Elisa x CUS1 F/12/001079 06/12/2012 15:07 Y.oltr.teier, Denis x CUST F/12/G01C82 06/27/2012 14;59 Igoe, Liz X CUST F/12/001160 07/26/2013 15:24 crass, Wende X C(JJ" T 03/20/2013 9:39 F/12/007.160 Bouchard, Roger X 08/01/2012 12:50 Today 's Date 9/9/2013HAMILTON COUNTI' JUVENM1<.JCMR464 C.OLT2T Page 3 OBJECTION MOTIONS FILEI3 FROM 05/25/2012 to 03/31/2013 Case Code Case Number Magistrate Judicia:i CD Motion Date
CUST F/12/001160 Cross, Wende CUST X 02/22/2013 0;C0 F/12/001324 BoAer-Koch, Kathryn CUST X 02/21/2013 9:21 F/12/001324 Boller--Xoch, Kathryn CUST x 08/12/2013 13:55 i?/12/001373 Cross, Wende CJ5:1` Y 05/06/2013 14:31 F/12/001388 ' OBJECTION NJOTZONS IFILED TT-ZO4VI 05/25/2012 to 08/31l2013 Case Code Case tiumber Magistrate Judicial CD Motion Date DEL /12/007082 Montgoaiery, David z 12/06/2012 10:06 DEL /12/007099 Hcucnard, Roger X 09/20/2012 15:14 DEL /12/007278 Kelley, David 4 08/29/2012 13:30 DEL /12/007279 Kelley, David Z 08/27/2012 15:13 D EL /12/007288 Ke.2,ley, David N 09/04/2012 15:17 DEL /12/007306 Kelley, David 09/04/201215t18 DEL /12/CG73C7 Kelley, David z 08/29/2012 13:32 L`EL /12/CG7308 Iie:iley, David ? 08/27/2012 15:06 DEL /12/007509 Montgomery, David Z 08/31/2012 8:27 i) E 1. /12./00751-0 Montgomery, David 2 08/31/2012 8:20 DEL /12/007512 Montgomery, David z 08/31/2012 8:28 DEL /`12/007513 Montgomery, David 2 08/31/2012 8:27 DEL /12/C07650 Adelmann, Laura Z 08/30/2012 15:45 DF:L /i.2/007651 Acielmann, Laura Z 08/30/2012 15:50 DEL /12/007652 Adelmann, Laura Z 08/30/2012 15:51 PE L /12/007653 Adelmann, Laura Z 08/30/2012 15:52 DpT /12/007655 Adeimann, :..aura 2 08/28/2012 15:31 DE:. /12/007656 ade.lmann, Laura 2 C8/28/2012 15:32 DEL /12/007657 Adelmann, Laura 7 08/28/2012 15:32 DEL /12/007901 Kelley, Catherine E 7.1/13/2012 13:45 DEL /12/008854 Bouchard, Roger 2 05/08/2013 14:31 DEL /12/009005 Bouchard, Roger x 03/11/2013 15:32 DEL /12/009032 Bouchard, Roger Z 01/22/2013 10:41 DEL /12/009438 Montgomery, David Z 11/07/2012 9:20 DEL /i2/009747 Adelmann, Laura z 11/20/2012 9;25 DEL /i2/009749 Adelrr:ann, i.aura z 11/20/2012 9:25 DEL /12/010046 Bouchard, Roger X 05/07/2013 10:03 DEL /12/G10837 t3oi,chard, Roger z 06/11/2013 12:09 DEL /12/011112 Kelley, Davi.d X 02/11/2013 10,58 DEL /12/012b95 Kelley, Catherine 2 01/17/2013 10;57 DEL /12/012095 Kelley, Catherine Z 01/17/2C13 10:58 DEL /13/000002 Ke:.ley, Catherine 2 01/30/2013 15:20 DEL /13/000243 Love, Ayanna Z 015/30/2013 14:42 i: EL /13/00J321 Montgomery, David X 06/06/2013 13:05 DEL /13J000487 Washington, Scheherazade z 04/17/2013 8:46 DEL /13/00C880 Bouc:ard, Roger z 05/08/2013 14:28 DEL /13/001088 Cross, Wende X 04/05/2013 15:06 DEL /13/001088 Cr.oss, Wende x 03/22/2013 10:50 DEL /13/00109-0 Cross, Wende K 03/22/2013 10:16 DEL /13/G01302 Bouchard, Roger 2 05/23/2013 8:41 DEL /13/002280 Bouchard, Roger Z 05/14/2013 8:21 DEL /13/002367 K.'tssinger, Curtis x 04/22/2013 13:20 DEL /13/003430 Montgomery, David 2 05/30/2013 11:i8 DEL /13/003739 Cross, Wende K 05/22/2013 9:35 DEL /13/003740 Cross, idende K 05/22/2013 9:36 DEL /13/004403 Schulcz, Mary Z 06/21/2013 14:52 DEL /13/004677 schui.cz, Mary Z 06/21/2013 12:29 DEL /13/004810 Murdock, Constance Z 06/14/2013 11:05 DEL /13/004852 Murdock, Constance X 06/27/2013 8:12 DEL /13/004853 Murdock, Conatance x 06/27/2013 8:13 DEL /13/004952 Schulcz, Mary 7 06/21/2013 0;00 DEL /13/005433 Cross, r7ende z 07/09/2013 9;16 D'E L• /13/005712 Anten, HrJan x 07/19/2013 10:34 DEL /13/005894 Kelley, David Z 08/14/2013 11<29 DEL /13/006755 Cross, Wende X 08/26/2013 14:48 DE P i?'%96/00i"114 Watkins, Katherine X 06/22/2012 15:02 DEP :I99/000449 Milazzo, Charles x 08/08/2012 11:07 DEP F/01/002180 Resler, Mark y 07/25/2013 10:22 DEP F/01/G02180 Resler, Mark x 07/24/2013 15;19 DEP F/02/0C0388 Bouc;ia.rd, Roger z 09/17/2012 15:30 DF.P F/03/000669 Love, Ayanna Z 04/29/2013 8:57 DEP F/04/001506 Love, Ayan,-ya x 08/23/2013 9:41 DEP F/04/002085 Falter, Karen X 10/04/2012 9:32 DEP F/06/000660 So11er-Koch, Katrryn Z 10/18/2012 8:43 DEP F/06/001562 Demott, Paul L 05/03/2013 15;16 DEP F/06/001562 Demott, Paul 4 08/06/2012 9:27 DEP F/O6/C01600 Love, Ayanna z 07/25/2013 13:14 D E P F/G7/0G1653 Soller-Koch, Kathryn Z 04/05/2013 15:2.5 LEP F/07/001653 8oller-Kooh, Kathryn 2 06/19/2012 0;00 'oday s,Date 9/9/2013 HAiAlILT®N COTJNTYJr[IVENILE COURT jCMR 46 4 page 5 OBJECTION MOTIaiNS FILED FROM 05/25/2012 to [}8/37/2013 Case Code Case Number Magistrate Judicial CD Motion Date LE? F/07/001653 5oller-Koch, Kathryn Z GEP 10/08/2012 15:10 F/07/001653 Boller-Koch, Kathryn Z 04/08/2013 12:45 D:'P F/07/002858 Demott, Pau7. x 05/07/201312;48 DEP F/07/002858 Deaott, Paul x 05/08/2013 9:31 DEP F/08/001298 Anthony, Brenda CE$ 03/14/2013 10:41 F/08/001590 Boller-Koc.h, Kathryn DEP 06/01/2012 10:57 1•"/08/00159D Boller-Koch, Kathryn 06/04/2012 13:49 DEP F/08/9017A7 Milazzo, Charles x 10/12/2012 15:30 DEP F/08/001747 Nilazzo, Charles X 10l15/2012 13:47 DEF F/08/001.797 Mi.lazzo, Charles X 10/05/2012 11:08 DEP F/09/001558 Anthony, Brenda X DEP 03/14/2013 12:i.3 E'/09/001E37 Plashington, Scheherazade 2 12/11/2012 15:15 pEP F/09/001680 Anthony, Brenda x 05/02/2013 i1:55 DEP F/09/007680 Anthony, Brenda 05/15/2013 9:36 pEP F/0 9/001680 Anthony, Brenda 07/06/2012 14:21 DEP F/09/001771 Milazzo, Charles 10/i0/2012 9:30 D EP F/09/001771 Milazzo, Charles z 10/05/2012 15:19 DEP F/09/001799 Coleman, John z 01/03/20 DEP E'/09/00=956 113 16:02 Dem,ott, Paul X D E P F/09/002083 10/24/2012 10:50 Anthony, Brenda x D%P 08/05/2613 9:37 F/09/002083 Anthony, Brenda x 08/09/2013 15:10 DEP F/09/002555 Resler, Mark z 07/26/2013 15:23 DEP F/09/002555 Resler, Mark z 05/09/2013 15:39 DFP F/09/002555 Resler, Mark z DEo 02/15/20a3 11:35 F/09/002555 Milazzo, Charles z 06/06/2012 13:29 DEP F/09/002732 3ollex-Koch; Kathryn z DrP 11/13/2012 i.1:28 F'/09/002732 Boller-Koch, Kathryn z 11/20/2012 13:28 DEP F/09/002783 Milazzo, Charles z 08/30/2012 15:40 DEP F/7:0/000022 MUrPhy, Elisa z DEP S'/10 /00 00 9 6 06/07/2013 9:43 Res1er, Mark x DEP 07/05/2013 10:4"3 F/i0/000464 Coleman, John z 04/22/2013 12:32 DEP F/10/001099 Boller-TCoch, Kathryn X. DEP 11/01/2012 11:44 F/10/001159 rlashington, Schehesazade z 07/11/2012 12;26 DEP °/10/001571 Anthcny, Brenda 12/17/2012 8:?.4 DE9 3'/10/001571 Anthony, Brenda 10/15/2012 8:24 DEP ='/ 10/002037 Anthony, Brenda 11/27/2012 15:54 D'c'P b'/10/002037 Anthony, Brenda .EP 11/09/2012 8:10 3'/10/002037 I r,t 7o.n} , Brenda :1/29/2012 15:20 DEP k'/ 10/002348 Falter, Karen z DEP F/11%000341 0 9/21/2012 14:30 Wash;.ngton, Scheherazade X nEP F/11/000341 06/10/2013 8:49 Washington, Scheherazade X 06/14/2013 9:00 6EP F/1i/0130861 Love, Ayanna z 01/18/2013 14:44 DEP E1111000861 Love, Ayanna z 01/23/2013 0:00 DEP F/11/001143 Anthony, Brenda z Dr^;P 07/10/2013 14:06 F/11/001143 Anthony, Brenda z 05/18/2013 0:00 bEP F/11/001143 Ar,thany, Brenda z 05/15/2013 14:04 DEP F/11/001233 Falter, Karen X DEP 07/16/2012 14:15 F/11/001233 r3ashint}ton, Schehera^_ade X 04/05/2013 8:14 DEP F/11/001355 Demotz, Paul z Di o 05/13/2013 15:03 F/1i/001503 Dernott, c'au?. z 07/18/2012 10:56 DEP F/11/001732 Mti=Phyr Elisa z DE P 06/;9/2012 10:47 :,>11/001824 Anthon.3 ; Brenda z 02/22/2013 15:47 DE P F/11/002156 Guenthner, Carla X 02/12/2013 15:34 DEP F/11f002156 Pilazzo, Charles 05/31/2012 15:48 DEY F/11/002285 Love, Ayanna 11109/iCi2 15:41. OEP F/11/002475 Falter, Karen 10/15/2012 9:4i DEP F/11/002643 Holi.er-Koch, i{ati`:ryn z 02/06/2013 11:03 DEP F/12/00G006 Coleman, John ^ 05/10/2013 14:44 ^EP r/12/000542 Coleman, John z 07/27/2012 8:24 DEP F/12/000778 Demott, Paul 2 11/25/2012 15:02 DEP F/12/000778 De;nott, Paul z 07/13/2012 12:17 Dr.P F/12/001162 Coleman, Johin x 10/18/2012 13:53 IlEP F/12/001163 Bo11er-Y.octi, Kathryn X 07/20/2012 15:24 DEP F/12/001167 Love, Ayanna X 02/11/2013 14:42 DF' P F/12/00127b Coieiaan, John x 06/19/2013 15:12 DEP F/12/a01280 Love, Ayanna X 06/25/2013 13:33 DEP F/12/001443 3oller-Kocl:, Kathryn X 11/30/2012 13:03 DEP ;/72/001677 Bo12er-Koch, Kathryn z 03/0B/2013 12:30 DEP F/12/001677 6o13.er-Koch, Kathryn z 01/10/2013 10:44 oday's,Date0,/9/2013 HAi1IILi'UN CQUN'I,Y. JUVENILE COURT JCMR464 Page 6 OB,7Ei CTIt3N MOTIONS FILED FROM 05/25/2012 to 08/31/2013 Case Code Case Number Magi.:strate juo'i.ci:ai: CD Motion Date DrP F/12/001677 Bo;,ler-TCoch, Kathryn pnP z 03/12/2013 13:13 F/12/001740 Demott, Paul z 06/19/2013 15:22 DEP F/12/OC17e^0 Demott, Pau.I z 06/26/2013 15:01 DF,P F/12/001797 Love, Ayanna K 09/18/2012 0:00 DSP F/12/001797 Love, Ayannz x 09/18/2012 0:00 DE: n F/12/001797 Love, Aya.n.na x 12/14/2012 15:25 DEP E1I12/001980 Boller-Koch, Kathrvn ? 05/17/2013 11:37 DEQ 'r'/12/002024 Love, Ayanna DEB X 02 /7,2i 2013 0:00 P/12/002100 Love, Ayanna DEP 2 07/25/2013 14:29 F/12/002408 Murphy, Eiisa Z 06/24/2013 13:23 DEP P/13/000444 WasYrir,gton; Scheher.azade K 06/03/2013 13:38 DEP F/13/000592 Love, Ayanna 2 03/21/2013 8:28 DEP F/13/000596 Resier, Mark X 06/25/2013 10:12 DEP F/13f001139 Love, Ayanna Z 08/21/201-3 8:49 DEP F/13/C01139 Love, Ajcanna Z 08/29/20I3 13:54 DE P F/13/001418 Love, Avanna z 07/25/2013 9:25 D-E P F/13/001418 Love, Ayanr.a z 07/25/2013 9:37 J PO F/12/001062 Ho.ltmeier, Denis 2 06/20/2012 15:45 JPO F/12/001062 4latki.ns, Katherine z 06/11/2012 12:56 liPO F/12/001063 Holtmeier, Denis Z 06/20/2012 15:42 l;PO F/12/001063 Holtmeier, Denis 7 06/11/2012 12:46 JP0 F/12/002462 Cross, Wende 2 01/17/2013 10:46 PAT x/80/003007 Montgomery, David z 04/03/2013 15:05 PAT F781/001484 Cross, Wende X 05/29/2013 8:58 PAT P/91/001302 Kelley, David 2 02/15/2013 D:00 PAT P/91/001303 Kelley, David 2 02/15/2013 0:00 PF.T P/91/001304 Kelley, David ^ 02/15/2013 0:00 PAT P/91/001305 Kel.ley, David z 02/:.5/20:3 0:00 PAT P/91/001306 Ke11ey, David z 02/15/2013 0:00 PAT P/91/001307 Ke11ey, David Z 02/15/2013 0:00 PAT P/94/000179 Holtmeier, Denis L OB/24/2012 12r44 PAT P/95/001153 Montgomery, David z 07/24/2013 11:14 PAT P/96/001521 Mnrdock, Constance X 02/13/2013 14:10 PA"_' P/97/003320 Montaomery, David 2 12/03/2012 11:16 PAT P/00/000047 Igoe, Liz X 04/30/2013 8:34 PAT P/01/003627 Montgomerv, David Z 11/13/2012 15:28 PAT P/03j001476 Webb, Donald Z 08/20/2012 10:1I UAT P/04/001175 Luken, Susan 2 09/28/2012 14:i8 PAT P/i0/0007i3 Murdock, Constance z 0:/28/2013 0:00 PAT P/11/002755 Luken, Susan x 06/18/2012 11:23 PAT P/11/002755 Gray, Rob x 08/27/2012 12:18 ?F T P/12/C01380 VFebb, Donald z 08/09/2012 14,43 ?A T P/12/001787 Mor,tgomery, David 'AT Z 01/10/2013 9:35 P/12/001.788 Montgomery, David nAT ? 01/10/2013 9:36 P/12/001923 Kelley, Ddvid 7 01/04/2013 13:31 ?AT P/12 3 002067 Adelmann, Laura Z 01 i02/2013 i3:51 'AT P/12/002067 Adelmann, Laura z 12/21/2012 13:23 'AT P/12/002467 Adelmann, Laura Y 04/i9/2013 8:27 UPT P/86/001107 Cross, Wende 2 05/29/2013 8r56 LPT Ff86/0C1108 Crass, Wende X 05/29/2013 8 r 53 tG'PT P/93/002131 Webb, Donald ' 10/24/2012 15:00 %UPT P/94/0-02043 89ontgomery, David L 04/03/2013 15c00 CiPT P/96/003615 Montgomery, David Z 04/03/2013 15:02 OPT P/97/002420 Bouchard, B. Z 07/11/2013 15:47 OPT. P/98/000392 Adelmann, Laura X 07/31/2013 13:18 liPT P/98/002165 Murdock, Constance X 02/14/2013 10:27 UPT P/99/OC1229 Adelmann, Laura X 12/21/2012 14:01 UPT P/99/001760 Ke12ey, Catherine X 10/25/2012 10:58 UPT P/00/002589 Murcock, Constance Z 02/08/2013 9:31 U PT Y/00/002589 Murdock, Constance 2 02/14/2013 9:28 UPT P/0.1/001669 Keliey, Catherine z 08/03/2012 13:20 U P'P P/02/001380 Schuicz, Mary )PT ti 03/20/2013 9:56 P/02/002374 L'aker<, Susan )?T z 07/03/2012 11:56 P/04/000631 f3ouc:n3rd, Roger z 04/04/2013 11:53 IPT P/04/001323 Kelley, David z 10/03/2012 15:08 )PT P/04/002875 Holtme.i.er, Dsnis X -0/03/2012 10:21 ;PT P/05/00i06i Adelmar,n, Laura X 0E3/16/2012 12;42 JPT P/05/001614 Montgomery, David X 05/24/2013 11c41 )PT P/05/001797 Montgornery, DuVid z ,, - ,.,.,, 11 ,- raday S Date `9/9/2013UIAINIILTOiV CoUNTY J[VFNILEJCMR464 COLIRT Page 7 OBTECTI()I4 MoTIQ14S F.ILED FROM 05/25/2012ta 08/31/2013 Case Code Case Number b:acistrate Judicial CD Mot;o:, Date SUP'" P/05/007:928 Montgomery, David SUcT 02/14/2013 12:29 P/05/002879 Adelrnann, Laura SUPT 09/27/2012 15:17 P/057003545 Adelmann, Latra SUPT 08/23/2013 9:26 P/035/003574 Adelm.ann, Laura SUPT 08/16/2012 12:41 P/06/001680 Kelley, David SUPT 12/06/2012 13:12. P/06/003021 Luken, Susan SUPT 06/04/2012 11:26 P/06/D03423 Montgomery, David SUPT 11/13/2D1.2 15:37 P/06/003423 Montgomery, David SUPT 11/09/2012 11:06 P/07/001058 Kelley, Cat.heri:,e Si;PT 12/17/2012 11:07 P/-97/00i852 Kelley, Catherine 11/15/2012 10:01 SUPT P/07/002351 Gray, Rob 0611312012 14:45 SUPT P/07/003348 Bo+schard, B. SUPT 05/16/2013 9:39 P/08/000242 Holtmeier, Denis SUPT 06/12/2012 15:14 P/C8/000249 Sanders, Nicole SUPT 07/02/2013 10:37 P/08/000378 Sanders, Nicole SUPT 05/22/2C1- 15:22 P/08/000698 Kelley, Catnerine SUPT 08/03/2012 13:20' P/08/001364 Kelley, Cat:erine SUPT 02/12/2013 16:01 P/08/002882 fioltmei.er, Denis SUPT 12/19/2012 15:11 P/09/00113; Mr,ntgomery, Dav;.d SUPT 09/24/2012 13:30 P/09/001870 Kelley, Catherine SUPT P/09/001870 02/07/2013 10:24 Kelley, Catherine SUPT 02/13/2013 14:05 P/09/001991 Schulcz, Mary SUPT 05/03/2013 9;1B P/09/002258 Holtmeier, Dej-'is SUPT 10/29/2012 10:19 P/09/002258 M.urdock, Constance SUPT 01/28/2013 C;00 P/09/00225$ Holtmeie r, Denis SUPT 11/28/2012 0:00 P/:0/000377 Schilicz, :;ary SUPT 06/01/2012 14:14 P/10/000388 Haltmeier, Denis SUp; 10/19/2012 15:38 P/11/000723 Kelley, Catherine SIIP; 1_1/07/2012 9:52 P/11/001952 Kelley, David SUPT 06/22/2012 15:31I :/11/001952 Kelley, David SUPT 06/203 2012 12:26 P/11/002282 Luken, Susan SUPT 08%17/20:2 11:13 P/11/002454 Igoe, Liz SUPT 01/24/2013 9:41 F/11/002605 "4ontgomery, David SUPT 05/13/201311:06 P/11/0026fi5 Murdcck, Constance SUPT 04/19/2013 13;29 P/1i/002665 Murdock, Constance SJPT 04/18/2013 13:40 P/11/0Q2898 Tr,oe, Liz SUPT 06/17/2013 13:52 P/12/000097 Kelley, David SUPT 07/2772012 11:06 P/12%000i38 ifelley, David SUPT 07/30/2012 13:04 F/12/000605 Sanders, Nicole S U P'1' 08J02/2013 10;40 P/12/000702 Adelmann, Laura SUPT 02/05/2013 10:20 P/12/000710 Kelley, Catherine SUPT 02/04/2013 8:41 P/12/00i028 Kelley, David 01/24/2013 8:38 SUPT P/12/001363 VIST F/09/002696 Luken, Susan z 10/16/20i2 14:51 VIST F/10/000187 tioltneizer, n -eris }{ 103 11/20?2 10:15 VTST F/10/001024 Ke11ep, Catherine L 12/27/2012 13:55 VIST F/10/001438 Luken, Susar. 2 V15T 08/29/2012 1-^:10 F/10100143E3 Luken, Susan L VIST 08/30/2012 1A:28 F/10/002712 Schulcz, N,ary X vTsz, 05/06/2013 15:25 F/11/000803 Murdock, Constance x VIST 10/25/2012 12:04 FI11/000803 Z3urdoc:k, Constance x =2/27/2012 13:22 VIST F/11/0008G4 Murdock, Constance C 10/25/2012 12:30 VIST F/11/00U804 Msrdoc:t, Constance g VIST 12/27/2012 13:07 F/11%G-02077 Kelley, Catherine x 10/09/2012 15:16 VIST F/11/0G2138 Ke11ey, David Z 01/23/2013 10:32 `JIS.. F/11/002328 Adelmann, Laura X 02/i5/2013 14:22 VIST r^/11/002553 Murdock, Constance z 01/09/2013 9:31 VIST F/12/0010$6 Luken, Susan L 07/30/2012 12:58 V:,ST. F/13/000439 MontgoMery, David x 06/21/2013 13:55 VIST F/13/001p60 Montgomery, David z 07/15/207.3 14:05 ^f (0 4 C ER'I1.FTt"ATE OF ASSIGNi^iENw The Honorable Thamas Raymozad Li.pps, a retired judge of the Hamilton County Cot1rt: of Common P! ea.S, Jl.lVeniye jjivi assigr;ed effective October 29, 2013, to preside ?n the Hamilton Caunty Coa,t of Commor: Pleas, Juvenile Divis ,won, for the monthw c^ November 2013 through January 2014 to hear all cases in which Cbiections to Magistrate;' Decisions are pending past the 120- ciay time gu,i.delline as o.f October 15, 2013, as es4abl^.shed by the Supreme Court of Ohio and to coiiclude any proceedings in whzch he participaied. Maureen O '^"_oT:Tlor Chief JuSt.ice 13JA2.657 Exhibit C "^U^rme ^rrztr# of 04ia October 29, 2013 Hon. John Meyer Williams Ham:i i, tozz: County Court of Common Pleas 800 3raad?uay Cinci.nn.atij OH 4S202-1225 Dear ^.^"udg^- ti+7i7.7 -iatr,s : Enclosed is a Certificate of Assignment, Please: 1. file the ca-rigi.nal with the clerk; 2. file a copy in the case file; 3. immediately notwify counsel of record of the assignment; and 4. contact the assigned judge to establish a case raanagernerit, schedule. if you have any questions, please refer to the Guidelines for Assignment of Judges or contact me at (614) 387-9415. Sincerely, Diane E. Hayes Judicial Assignment Speci alist Enclosure: 13J?i2657 ^ . ^. . , .,. . ., ,. .. -. ^ . ` '...... ,^...... , _ __ _ . ..._. :-aday^e nat<: . ,SL'PRr?YLECGtIRTOFOHIO scNa42a ;u/1ci`ol^ FOR'12D TLiVf;t^TLF.DII%iSION ^-- CO"JTtTORCOYL'4.ON PLEAS Dateofcompieticnafmost If rcceittpiiysicntcascinventory ( c urt_y; Nazl.ten f 2013 J•,:dBa;Truc,e ' M. Iiu.^.ter -1 f .A B C D E P' fI T J TC TV ______^^--- . ed„asny eoq or 7arind fi79 143 4^50 ^ 68 35 392 304 34 0 0 2306 0 i ------^ -- -_ Ne.+ ., avd 2 323 117----t . Z 9 29 r90 64 6S 10 p 0 646 0 __ - Cas s x1^sS rx.ed inr .3 234 6 22 20- 13 1 23 72 4 4 I 0 394 0 fleec^.vnced,AOdesignatad Te'fAL (k.dd 1lnos 1-3) 4 ^ 1y36 2G6 501 1? 7 57 479 ! 441 48 0 ------06 0 ± ER)1•f iNATf O NS 9Yi A SC D E. G ?: I J I< T i-" ^______i:A-! by udge 5 8 1 0 Ji 2 0 ' Q^ C 12 0 Tr,iaS by ,r,agiscr:its fi ^^ - -- --^ 196 14 1 27 10 ., ^ 0 21 4 0 277 0 D_s.^^.cal bypzsty, 9 , 52 6 141 19 3 0 23 2G 1 E 0 0 T44 0 ;udJ:C. aY pYO9ticttcak .Adrr:i.sslan to ^udge .g 7 z o a n oE a o o o^ o! s o^ --- i - ^----- ^ ----i . . ,,s?on tc ma9istxdLe ry 73 91 7 i 7 20 i 106 4 0 0 309 C=YL./Yts.veT gzezCad IO x „ x x x x x x une•J^t^at;_ii:y ^: rarev I; LS1 Si G 13 6 0 p fi' O Q 175 ^ D fOX. Cr.^ a Y 7'ran,{aY tc zncthoi 1,^, ^ Zg s o o 0 O 0!^ a a I z^ { o judge oz court ` I 1 Fsf.orra: to x x ( x x a i- x G 0 Q a 0 I ^ i 9 pr3vare judge f 4 :nterlocuiory 14 0 0 0 o o o o o; oo^ appeallozdei { C=hei cminxticna A$ li^ I ! f _ fOTAb(Addiines:5,15) 26 509 124 51 51 18 0 67 143 5 0 0 968 0 I ( i ; ^ i 1 _ I + Ye.ndyny endoE r,eraod jy 927 142 450 66 j 39 1 1 412 298 43 0 0 ^ Z378 ^ 0; tsa•o_ i:, 1-6 Er ln 47 --{--- ^--- -^------^ ____ ^ TS.me danof>fAai fi 3 i^ 3 3 G 9 9, .12 j 12 9 ^ 6 I x i x I ^ -T casa p ui.g 6oyond .g 22 i 2^ 141i. g 2ff 4 28/' 4,1 U 0 0^ 77 0 t!,n guzd iine v No oP -n nths o;do_t19 8i 0i 78 5 4 0 24 11 0 0 0{ x! y d e:me guide 1G;noer of- frtfozmal ca3es jp d9 0 6^ 0 00 a a 0 0 0 49 0 fail ca..e ty,-.ee] ^ ^ i A 13 C D >; F c T3 r J x T v r•ax to: (G,.4) 357-94E9 -or• Mrif to: JixlgeSigunfare TiacleM: Hunter Dal - ^Y Cnse Nh sx6enient Section heSuC reme Coart ofOh)o ` b^4 A_ 65 S.Front Street, 6th rfoor Prepnrer nnJ telephmic numuez if otl;er fhrn Jtldge Gale CoEem bis, Ohio 43215-3431 Administr;itivsJudge ^- - A-- - - pate