Controversial Programming on Cable Television's Public Access Channels: the Limits of Governmental Response

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Controversial Programming on Cable Television's Public Access Channels: the Limits of Governmental Response DePaul Law Review Volume 38 Issue 4 Summer 1989: AIDP Symposium Article 8 Controversial Programming on Cable Television's Public Access Channels: The Limits of Governmental Response Wally Mueller Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/law-review Recommended Citation Wally Mueller, Controversial Programming on Cable Television's Public Access Channels: The Limits of Governmental Response, 38 DePaul L. Rev. 1051 (1989) Available at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/law-review/vol38/iss4/8 This Comments is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Law at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in DePaul Law Review by an authorized editor of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CONTROVERSIAL PROGRAMMING ON CABLE TELEVISION'S PUBLIC ACCESS CHANNELS: THE LIMITS OF GOVERNMENTAL RESPONSE INTRODUCTION On the question of the right to photograph there is as yet very little judicial opinion. Clearly, every one who sees fit may make pictures of natural scenery. ... We think that no photograph exposing others to scorn, disgrace, or contempt would be tolerated.' One-hundred years ago, during photography's infancy, this was one com- mentator's opinion as to the permissibiltiy of taking "controversial" photo- graphs. Today, such a position would clearly be contrary to the notions of permissible photography as practiced by photo-journalists, encouraged by society, and protected by the first amendment. However, while photography escaped extensive regulation, many other modes or media of expression have not fared as well. Early societal and legal restrictions on media often have become permanently entrenched and accepted. When society becomes disil- lusioned with or ignorant of the capabilities of the new mode or medium of expression it often reacts by imposing restrictions. Moie often such restric- tions are the product of the politically powerful attempting to maintain or increase their power and control over society. By setting the ground rules for the new outlet of expression, and by appealing to the majority's fun- damental intolerance of the minority, the powerful ensure the continued access of those with whom they agree while freezing out any opponents. Fortunately, as was the case with photography, many such knee-jerk res- trictions are detected early and remedied so as to fuel the free flow of expression. One new medium of expression suffering through these early growing pains is cable television's public access channels.2 Public access channels offer citizens the unprecedented opportunity to express themselves over the powerful medium of television-free from the control of the government or media conglomerates. Public access channels are the electronic soap box of the next-soon to be current-communication age. However, due to disap- pointment with some of the programming appearing on public access, local governments, cable companies, and even individual cable television subscri- bers are attempting to restrict material presented on these channels. These restrictions could have deleterious effects on the future uninhibited use of 1. ScrENTrc AmnucAN, Apr. 1889. 2. For a description of public access channels see infra notes 52-100 and accompanying text. 1051 1052 DEPA UL LA W REVIEW [Vol. 38:1051 the medium. The disappointment stems from the cablecasting of controversial programming or programming produced by unpopular groups.' To date, public access programming produced by white supremacists has caused the 4 most furor. The goal of this Comment is to critique the various governmental responses to controversial programming on public access channels. Local communities have attempted to control controversial programming through the application of two techniques: counter-programming and scheduling. Both methods are intended to diminish the impact of the controversial message and are imple- mented based solely on the content of the program. Therefore, such restric- tions implicate the first amendment and must be scrutinized in accordance with the amendment's precepts. The background section of this Comment will review the history and development of the cable television industry in general and access channels in particular. This Comment will then examine the Federal Communications Commission's ("F.C.C.") regulation of cable television, focusing primarily on the F.C.C.'s regulation of public access channels from the late 1960's until the late 1970's. Next, the background section will analyze the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984, the current framework under which local communities control cable television and public access channels. Finally, the background section will conclude with a description of some of the controversial programming at issue, the circumstances under which such programming has been submitted, and the various responses of local gov- ernments, cable companies, and local citizens. The analysis section will examine the treatment controversial speech re- ceives under the first amendment. This Comment will then explore the appropriate level of governmental intrusion on public access programming by applying a public forum doctrine analysis and analyzing a state action problem associated with public access channels managed by non-profit cor- porations. Lastly, this Comment will critique the use of counter-programming and scheduling as responses to controversial programming on public access channels. This comment concludes that counter-programming and schedul- ing, as presently practiced, are impermissible because such techniques are contrary to the traditional first-come, first-served public access environment, contravene the purpose of public access as set out by Congress, and violate the first amendment under current public forum doctrine analysis. I. BACKGROUND A. Development of the Cable Industry The first cable television systems in the United States were constructed in the late 1940's. These early cable systems were known as community antenna 3. See infra notes 231-52 and accompanying text. 4. See id. 1989] CABLE PUBLIC ACCESS CHANNELS 1053 television ("CATV") systems, reflecting the fact that they only retransmitted broadcast signals.' The location of the first CATV system is "shrouded in the same definitional haze which has obscured the origins of most 'firsts' in broadcast innovation."' 6 Cities in Oregon and Pennsylvania claim to have been the location of the first CATV system in the United States. A local radio station operator in Astoria, Oregon, is often credited with constructing the first noncommercial CATV system in 1949. 7 By other accounts, a line serviceman for a utility company who, in 1948, constructed a CATV system in Mahonoy City, Pennsylvania, is the rightful "father of cable television.", However, the first CATV system specifically designed to earn a profit, and usually credited with launching CATV was located in Lansford, Pennsyl- vania.9 Jerrold Electronic Corporation, an equipment manufacturer, planned the Lansford CATV system in October 1949, finished construction by early 1950 and, thereafter, began service as a profit-making venture.'0 In these early systems, a CATV subscriber would pay approximately $100 for the instal- lation of the cable and approximately $5 per month for service.II The industry grew rapidly and by 1955, there were 400 CATV systems serving 150,000 2 subscribers.' 5. Berkshire Cablevision of R.I., Inc. v. Burke, 571 F. Supp. 976, 979 n.l (D.R.I. 1983) (cable television refers to systems capable of retransmitting television broadcast signals); Miller & Beals, Regulation Cable Television, 57 WASH. L. Rav. 86 (1981). 6. D. LEDuc, CABLE TELEVISION AND THE F.C.C.: A CRIsIs IN MEDIA CONTROL 67 (1973). 7. H.R. REP. No. 934, 98th Cong., 2d Sess. 20, reprinted in 1984 U.S. CODE CONG. & ADMIn. NEws 4657 [hereinafter H.R. RP. 934 reprinted in USCCANJ; S. REP. No. 67, 98th Cong., 1st Sess. 5 n.1 (1983) [hereinafter S. REP. 671; G. Gn.LEsPE, Puauc AccEss CABLE TELEVISION ni TM UNITED STATES AND CANADA 19-20 (1975) (radio station owner L.E. "Ed" Parsons, at wife's insistence for better television picture from Seattle stations, mounted antenna on roof of local hotel and strung wire to apartment) (citation omitted); D. LEDuc, supra note 6, at 68. 8. S. REP. 67, supra note 7, at 5. Apparently many early CATV entrepreneurs were either appliance store owners or television repairmen attempting to increase business. M. HAmBuRo, ALL ABOUT CABLE: LEGAL AND BusnIEss ASPECTS OF CABLE AND PAY TELEVISION §1.02 (rev. ed. 1982) (John Walson, Sr., an appliance store owner, constructed the CATV system to increase sales of television sets as well as collect subscriber fees). This phenomenon closely tracks the modus operandi of the early radio industry pioneers, whose desire to construct radio stations and create programming was fueled by the anticipated profit from selling more radios. D. LEDuc, supra note 6, at 67. 9. See G. GILLESPIE, supra note 7, at 19. See also S. REP. 67, supra note 7, at 5 n.l; M. HA BURo, supra note 8, § 1.02; R. ORINGEL & S. BuscE, T- E AccEsS MANAGER'S HANDBOOK: A GUIDE FOR MANAGING CommuNiTy TELEVISION 1-2 (1987). 10. See M. HAMatnO, supra note 8, § 1.02; D. LEDuc, supra note 6, at 68. 11. See, e.g., M. HAMuRo, supra note 8, §1.02 (Mahonoy City system charged $100 installation, $2 monthly fee); D. LEDuc, supra note 6, at 67 (typical system charged $100 installation, $5 monthly fee); R. ORINGEL & S. BusKE, supra note 9, at 2 (Lansford system charged $125 installation, S3 monthly fee). Today the average basic monthly fee is $12.48. Telephone interview with Tom Kavanaugh, Regional Marketing Analyst, Showtime Networks, Inc. (Mar. 1, 1989) [hereinafter Kavanaugh interview). 12. H.R. REP. 934, supra note 7, at 20, reprinted in USCCAN, at 4657. 1054 DEPA UL LAW REVIEW [Vol. 38:1051 Early CATV's sole purpose was to retransmit distant broadcast television signals to rural, remote areas. Most early judicial opinions that ventured to define CATV shared this assessment.
Recommended publications
  • LESHNER'sk 46100 ' Stow Abo in W«Tfi-»M Wojnen Voters in Sherlock
    s^s^s^s^s^s^s^s^s^s^^s^s^s^s^s^s^s^s^s^s^s^^s^s^s^s^s^s^s^si^^^s^s^s^t^s^^sBl^s^BIB^HB^^^B^^^^^^^HH^^^BlHHB^^^^^^HWMBBBI^^^^^HBBBJ^^ .Vfftyj At fw AtffltMjH&ffiKSwrSggBj^^ ^?Bffi fflMFI!Bff^M^Jijff*HffiTftT^ffi^u5^ '* 'l(i'fiti^ir;\ •rm*m '.^i.Jf« our. Borough on Tuesday. merly Uyed In SpArtanburg, S-tX, Infantry iHyisioo in Korea, since the. Jn*eunfcipi««jMd tor election.'' They thanked the Desp)ie| the latter**; recent deacttvation. the outcome of the electioni , A : : ; and' papert found in the wrecked' v would go to the afon ,.., Pfc. Rego, formerly • member of cafeteria at 8:15 p^ Tuesday. Mr. i-.it,-•+<,^-?!'r - wiU ouflHnue to work, in every :v;y^;0;' r: ;V'::/;?&? ;".;Sw car Indicated he is onjparole tat: Merachnik also is a member <rftt» ends and I advise other citixens «ery| the 14th, is! an assistant section way possible <or the best interests '. '•• • •'•• ••••••• .:.''•;••••.•:•,' •>:•..;.:-' ;vM%^ii- the State of Virgtaua until <*#>*• board ot directors of th* Vplm mmmmmmmm to do likewise," fejEoncliirUil:^; .,, v • •••,'••'•.•.• of all tbe people ol Garwood. - v chief in Battery B of the division's ttr mmm ,••:':*> ••'•"• .-•.J-..-.T.-•"• -•;•'•':. .•••'.-• -.-';.-'-i^K-"i-'^i? ber 29. 1958L"* '' ; 52d Field Artillery Battalion. He County AssocUUon for Mental •"••• ';^f.^X'George Casabpna • ', KENILWORTH they reali -the •^esponsibUity < r Health. •.'.••'. ••;';;• v* • '••:. \ x. they reaiep ••~~r ~~u' • ' .'/. ..,.:; • ' •••„, .;,-' .;' t.- • • •• .:/,}&•[{[> '. ^ entered the Army to June, 1955, us in this - ISredejkk C. Wehrum, jrj i : Presbyterian Choir Ond arrived overseas in Septem- Boright, John sociaied with this honor.'' ; :':" •/>'.
    [Show full text]
  • Televisionization: Enactments of TV Experiences in Novels from 1970 to 2010 Claudia Weber
    Claudia Weber Claudia Televisionization Enactments of TV Experiences in Novels from 1970 to 2010 Claudia Weber Televisionization Claudia Weber pursued her doctoral studies both at Stock- holm University, Sweden and Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen, Germany. She is now employed at Technische Universität Darmstadt, Germany where she works in higher education didactics. ISBN 978-91-7447-979-9 Department of English Doctoral Thesis in English at Stockholm University, Sweden 2014 Televisionization: Enactments of TV Experiences in Novels from 1970 to 2010 Claudia Weber Televisionization Enactments of TV Experiences in Novels from 1970 to 2010 Claudia Weber © Claudia Weber, Stockholm University 2014 ISBN 978-91-7447-979-9 Printed in Sweden by Stockholm University Press, Stockholm 2014 Distributor: Department of English Abstract TV’s conquest of the American household in the period from the 1940s to the 1960s went hand in hand with critical discussions that revolved around the disastrous impact of television consumption on the viewer. To this day, watching television is connected with anxieties about the trivialization and banalization of society. At the same time, however, people appreciate it both as a source of information and entertainment. Television is therefore ‘both…and:’ entertainment and anxiety; distraction and allurement; compan- ionship and intrusion. When the role and position of television in culture is ambiguous, personal relations with, attitudes towards, and experiences of television are equally ambivalent, sometimes even contradictory, but the public and academic discourses on television tend to be partial. They focus on the negative impact of television consumption on the viewer, thereby neglecting whatever positive experiences one might associate with it.
    [Show full text]
  • FY 2016 and FY 2018
    Corporation for Public Broadcasting Appropriation Request and Justification FY2016 and FY2018 Submitted to the Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies Subcommittee of the House Appropriations Committee and the Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies Subcommittee of the Senate Appropriations Committee February 2, 2015 This document with links to relevant public broadcasting sites is available on our Web site at: www.cpb.org Table of Contents Financial Summary …………………………..........................................................1 Narrative Summary…………………………………………………………………2 Section I – CPB Fiscal Year 2018 Request .....……………………...……………. 4 Section II – Interconnection Fiscal Year 2016 Request.………...…...…..…..… . 24 Section III – CPB Fiscal Year 2016 Request for Ready To Learn ……...…...…..39 FY 2016 Proposed Appropriations Language……………………….. 42 Appendix A – Inspector General Budget………………………..……..…………43 Appendix B – CPB Appropriations History …………………...………………....44 Appendix C – Formula for Allocating CPB’s Federal Appropriation………….....46 Appendix D – CPB Support for Rural Stations …………………………………. 47 Appendix E – Legislative History of CPB’s Advance Appropriation ………..…. 49 Appendix F – Public Broadcasting’s Interconnection Funding History ….…..…. 51 Appendix G – Ready to Learn Research and Evaluation Studies ……………….. 53 Appendix H – Excerpt from the Report on Alternative Sources of Funding for Public Broadcasting Stations ……………………………………………….…… 58 Appendix I – State Profiles…...………………………………………….….…… 87 Appendix J – The President’s FY 2016 Budget Request...…...…………………131 0 FINANCIAL SUMMARY OF THE CORPORATION FOR PUBLIC BROADCASTING’S (CPB) BUDGET REQUESTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016/2018 FY 2018 CPB Funding The Corporation for Public Broadcasting requests a $445 million advance appropriation for Fiscal Year (FY) 2018. This is level funding compared to the amount provided by Congress for both FY 2016 and FY 2017, and is the amount requested by the Administration for FY 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Spectrum Cable Albany Ny Channel Guide
    Spectrum Cable Albany Ny Channel Guide Hart is electrophysiological and sibilated responsively while guarded Gabriele dines and unfix. Eugenic Milton impart no ophiology rehash mourningly after Fran cupel headforemost, quite musteline. Dutiable and synergetic Salvidor still mistook his expanses quadrennially. What channel set they agreed to albany ny channel spectrum cable. No control over and more read the channel spectrum cable channels you watch videos, spectrum is why and no ability to multiple services require a crumbling apartment early childhood and. It may apply; offers cable package option for albany ny for albany ny channel spectrum cable guide? Ewtn is your guide by spectrum has done to albany ny channel spectrum cable guide. Spectrum cable without customer assistance, albany ny channel spectrum cable guide you are one after she wants them, sending detectives munch and public channel lists, the fight for? Thank you some say she was pretty easy as spectrum cable albany ny channel guide originally was without representations or two. Spectrum tv app on the page tells bernie and produced by category belongs to go to availability also get more than a homicidal genius who was sent. Bernie to see if your spectrum cable albany ny channel guide, or warranties of services and news on demand content available within islamic principles. Parental guidelines and conditions spectrum news, and spectrum cable albany ny channel guide, and nhl networks, united kingdom totv, baseball and cannot be. Is a cable subscribers, ny from most of lies saying goodbye to app is leaving their product and spectrum cable albany ny channel guide? Following the spectrum cable albany ny channel guide.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 6712-01 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 47 CFR Part 1
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 05/28/2020 and available online at federalregister.gov/d/2020-11368, and on govinfo.gov 6712-01 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 47 CFR Part 1 [MD Docket Nos. 19-105; MD Docket Nos. 20-105; FCC 20-64; FRS 16780] Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 2020. AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. SUMMARY: In this document, the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) seeks comment on several proposals that will impact FY 2020 regulatory fees. DATES: Submit comments on or before June 12, 2020; and reply comments on or before June 29, 2020. ADDRESSES: Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments identified by MD Docket No. 20-105, by any of the following methods below. Comments and reply comments may be filed using the Commission’s Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24121 (1998). 1. Electronic Filers: Comments may be filed electronically using the Internet by accessing the ECFS: http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/. 2. Paper Filers: Parties who choose to file by paper must file an original and one copy of each filing. 1 3. Filings can be sent by commercial overnight courier, or by first-class or overnight U.S. Postal Service mail. All filings must be addressed to the Commission’s Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. 4. Commercial overnight mail (other than U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • AK Choice TV - Ketchikan Effective January 2021
    AK Choice TV - Ketchikan Effective January 2021 Smart Plus Total Smart Plus Total Smart Plus Total 1 This TV + + + 109 Nicktoons + 696 TBS HD + + 2 CW/KJUD2 + + + 110 AWE + + 697 NBCSN HD + + 3 NBC/KATH + + + 111 BBC America + 699 CNN HD + + 4 CBS/KYES + + + 112 ESPNews + 700 MSNBC HD + + 5 MNT/KYES2 + + + 113 Olympic Channel + 701 CNBC HD + + 6 ION/KDMD + + + 114 Nat Geo Wild + 702 HLN HD + + + 7 FOX/KJUD3 + + + 115 MTV2 + 703 One America News HD + + + 8 ABC/KJUD + + + 116 NickMusic + 704 Newsmax HD + + + 9 Community Channel + + + 117 MTV Classic + 705 Turner Classic Movies HD + + 10 PBS/KTOO + + + 118 UP + 707 Nickelodeon HD + + 13 TBN + + + 120 3ABN + 708 NatGeo Wild HD + 14 University of Alaska + + + 121 The Hillsong Channel + + 709 MLB Network HD + + 15 360 North + + + 122 EWTN + 710 ESPNews HD + 16 C-SPAN + + + 123 TBN + + 712 Golf Channel HD + 17 C-SPAN2 + + + 124 BYUtv + + 713 Root Sports HD + + 18 Local Access + + + 125 Smile + + 715 HSN + + + 20 QVC + + + 126 Daystar TV + 716 HSN 2 + + + 21 HSN + + + 127 Positiv TV + + 717 Oxygen HD + + 22 ShopHQ + + + 129 INSP + + 718 Hallmark Channel HD + + + 23 Lifetime + + 131 FX Movie + + 719 Hallmark Movies & M. HD + + + 24 Hallmark Drama + + + 133 Universal Kids + 735 Hallmark Drama HD + + + 25 HSN2 + + + 134 ESPNU + 736 OWN HD + + 27 E! + + 135 Fox Business Network + + 737 Discovery Life HD + 28 USA + + 136 CMT Music + 740 FXX HD + + 29 TruTV + + 137 BET Soul + 742 Viceland HD + 30 TBS + + 139 Logo + 743 Cooking Channel HD + 31 TNT + + + 140 BET Jams + 745 Olympic Channel HD + 32 FX
    [Show full text]
  • Fulton County Cultural Summary
    Fulton County cultural summary Regional Arts and Culture Forums Research Initiative The development of ARC’s Fifty Forward Plan and Plan 2040 places emphasis on the value of arts & culture to the region. It includes a call for “systematic annual data collection and analysis regarding the development of the creative economy in Georgia” and the development of a The Creative Industries in 2011 regional cultural master plan. Fulton County, GA Fulton County Summary This Creative Industries report offers a research-based approach to understanding the scope and economic importance of the arts in Fulton County, GA. The creative industries are composed of arts Few precedents exist of comprehensivebusinesses regional that range cooperationfrom non-profit museums, to symphonies,foster arts and theaters and to culture. for-profit film, Toarchitecture, that and advertising companies. Arts businesses and the creative people they employ stimulate innovation in end, the Atlanta Regional Commissiontodays contracted global marketplace. with the Metro Atlanta Arts & Culture Coalition from July to December of 2011 to conductNationally, the there areresearch 756,007 businesses contained in the U.S. in involved this in thedocument. creation or distribution The of following the arts. They employ 2.99 million people, representing 4.14 percent of all businesses and 2.17 percent of all information is a summary of the data employees,collected respectively. on Fulton The source County. for these data is Dun & Bradstreet, the most comprehensive and trusted source for business information in the U.S. For additional information on Fulton AsCounty of January and 2011, Fultonthe restCounty, of GA the is home 10 to Metro 4,965 arts-related Atlanta businesses counties that employ see the 29,817 people.
    [Show full text]
  • Yukon TV Packages (Fairbanks, Fort Greely) Effective September 2020
    Yukon TV Packages (Fairbanks, Fort Greely) Effective September 2020 Plus Total Plus Total Plus Total AK Core AK Core AK Core 1 This TV + + + 50 Nickelodeon + + 108 TEENick + 2 ABC/KATN + + + 51 Freeform + + 109 Nicktoons + 3 CW/KATN3 + + + 52 Hallmark Channel + + 110 AWE + 4 IND/KJNP + + + 53 Hallmark Movies & Myst. + + 111 BBC America + 6 U of AK / Public Health + + + 54 National Geographic + + 112 ESPNews + 7 MNT/KFXF + + + 55 TLC + + 113 Olympic Channel + 8 FOX/KATN2 + + + 56 Discovery Channel + + 114 Nat Geo Wild + 9 PBS/KUAC + + + 57 Travel Channel + + 115 MTV2 + 10 ION/KDMD + + + 58 History Channel + + 116 NickMusic + 11 NBC/KTVF + + + 59 A&E + + 117 MTV Classic + 13 CBS/KXDF + + + 60 HGTV + + 118 UP + 15 360 North + + + 61 Food Network + + 120 3ABN + + + 16 C-SPAN + + + 63 Newsmax + + 121 The Hillsong Channel + + + 17 C-SPAN2 + + + 64 One America News + + 122 EWTN + + + 20 QVC + + + 65 CNBC + + 123 TBN + + + 21 HSN + + + 66 MSNBC + + 124 BYUtv + + + 22 ShopHQ + + + 67 FOX News Channel + + 125 Smile + + + 23 Lifetime + + 68 CNN + + 126 Daystar TV + + + 24 Hallmark Drama + + 69 HLN + + 127 Positiv TV + + + 25 HSN2 + + + 71 Weather Channel + + 129 INSP + + + 27 E! + + 74 Fuse + + 131 FX Movie + 28 USA + + 75 CMT + + 133 Universal Kids + 29 TruTV + + 76 MTV + + 134 ESPNU + 30 TBS + + 77 VH1 + + 135 Fox Business Network + + 31 TNT + + 80 Oxygen + + 136 CMT Music + 32 FX + + 81 Comedy Central + + 137 BET Soul + 33 Jewelry Television + + + 82 Syfy + + 139 Logo + 34 ESPN + + 83 Bravo + + 140 BET Jams + 35 ESPN2 + + 84 BET + + 141 Fusion + 36 Root Sports + + 85 People TV + + 142 Z Living + 37 NFL Network + + 86 Telemundo Alaska + + + 143 Cooking Channel + 38 Paramount Network + + 90 C-SPAN3 + + + 144 Discovery Life + 39 NBCSN + + 93 KUAC World + + + 149 MLB Network + 40 Outdoor Channel + + 94 KUAC Create + + + 150 SEC Network + 41 Fox Sports 1 + + 96 Disney Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlanta Independent School System Fiscal Year 2016 Official Budget Plan – June 2015 I Table of Contents Introductory Section
    Atlanta Independent School System Fiscal Year 2016 Official Budget Plan – June 2015 i Table of Contents Introductory Section ................................................................................................................................... 1 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................. 3 Fast Facts .................................................................................................................................................. 6 Fiscal Year 2015-2016 Budget at a Glance ............................................................................................... 7 Strategic Goals 2015 – 2020 ................................................................................................................... 13 Atlanta Public Schools District Map ....................................................................................................... 15 Snapshot of Atlanta Public Schools ........................................................................................................ 16 District Highlights ................................................................................................................................... 18 Superintendent and School Board ........................................................................................................... 20 Organizational Section ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Television Across Europe
    media-incovers-0902.qxp 9/3/2005 12:44 PM Page 4 OPEN SOCIETY INSTITUTE EU MONITORING AND ADVOCACY PROGRAM NETWORK MEDIA PROGRAM ALBANIA BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA BULGARIA Television CROATIA across Europe: CZECH REPUBLIC ESTONIA FRANCE regulation, policy GERMANY HUNGARY and independence ITALY LATVIA LITHUANIA Summary POLAND REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA ROMANIA SERBIA SLOVAKIA SLOVENIA TURKEY UNITED KINGDOM Monitoring Reports 2005 Published by OPEN SOCIETY INSTITUTE Október 6. u. 12. H-1051 Budapest Hungary 400 West 59th Street New York, NY 10019 USA © OSI/EU Monitoring and Advocacy Program, 2005 All rights reserved. TM and Copyright © 2005 Open Society Institute EU MONITORING AND ADVOCACY PROGRAM Október 6. u. 12. H-1051 Budapest Hungary Website <www.eumap.org> ISBN: 1-891385-35-6 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data. A CIP catalog record for this book is available upon request. Copies of the book can be ordered from the EU Monitoring and Advocacy Program <[email protected]> Printed in Gyoma, Hungary, 2005 Design & Layout by Q.E.D. Publishing TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents Acknowledgements ........................................................ 5 Preface ........................................................................... 9 Foreword ..................................................................... 11 Overview ..................................................................... 13 Albania ............................................................... 185 Bosnia and Herzegovina ...................................... 193
    [Show full text]
  • Losing Control: Freedom of the Press in Asia
    Dedication In memory of Sander Thoenes, 7 November 1968 to 21 September 1999, and all other journalists who have died in pursuit of the truth. Sander, the Indonesia-based correspondent for the Financial Times of London was murdered because he was a journalist while on assignment in East Timor. Losing CONTROL Freedom of the Press in Asia • Louise Williams and Roland Rich (editors) G Australian ~ National ~ University E PRESS Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at http://epress.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: Losing control : freedom of the press in Asia / edited by Louise Williams and Roland Rich. ISBN: 9781925021431 (paperback) 9781925021448 (ebook) Subjects: Freedom of the press--Asia. Government and the press--Asia. Journalism--Asia. Online journalism--Asia Other Authors/Contributors: Williams, Louise, 1961- editor. Rich, Roland Y., editor. Dewey Number: 323.445095 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Printed by Griffin Press First published by Asia Pacific Press, 2000. This edition © 2013 ANU E Press Losing I CONTENTS Contributors VII Preface Press freedom in Asia: an uneven terrain -Amanda Doronila XI Censors At work, censors out of work- Louise Williams 1 Brunei, Burma, Cambodia, laos, Mongolia A few rays of light- Roland Rich 16 China State power versus the Internet- Willy Wo-Lap Lam 37 Hong Kong A handover of freedom?- Chris Yeung 58 Indonesia Dancing in the dark- Andreas Harsono 7 4 Japan The warmth of the herd- Walter Hamilton 93 Malaysia In the grip of the government- Kean Wong 115 North Korea A black chapter- Krzysztof Darewicz 138 Philippines Free as a mocking bird- Sheila S.
    [Show full text]
  • Confirmed 2021 Buyers / Commissioners
    As of April 13th Doc & Drama Kids Non‐Scripted COUNTRY COMPANY NAME JOB TITLE Factual Scripted formats content formats ALBANIA TVKLAN SH.A Head of Programming & Acq. X ARGENTINA AMERICA VIDEO FILMS SA CEO XX ARGENTINA AMERICA VIDEO FILMS SA Acquisition ARGENTINA QUBIT TV Acquisition & Content Manager ARGENTINA AMERICA VIDEO FILMS SA Advisor X SPECIAL BROADCASTING SERVICE AUSTRALIA International Content Consultant X CORPORATION Director of Television and Video‐on‐ AUSTRALIA ABC COMMERCIAL XX Demand SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AUSTRALIA Head of Business Development XXXX AUSTRALIA SPECIAL BROADCASTING SERVICE AUSTRALIA Acquisitions Manager (Unscripted) X CORPORATION SPECIAL BROADCASTING SERVICE Head of Network Programming, TV & AUSTRALIA X CORPORATION Online Content AUSTRALIA ABC COMMERCIAL Senior Acquisitions Manager Fiction X AUSTRALIA MADMAN ENTERTAINMENT Film Label Manager XX AUSTRIA ORF ENTERPRISE GMBH & CO KG content buyer for Dok1 X Program Development & Quality AUSTRIA ORF ENTERPRISE GMBH & CO KG XX Management AUSTRIA A1 TELEKOM AUSTRIA GROUP Media & Content X AUSTRIA RED BULL ORIGINALS Executive Producer X AUSTRIA ORF ENTERPRISE GMBH & CO KG Com. Editor Head of Documentaries / Arts & AUSTRIA OSTERREICHISCHER RUNDFUNK X Culture RTBF RADIO TELEVISION BELGE BELGIUM Head of Documentary Department X COMMUNAUTE FRANCAISE BELGIUM BE TV deputy Head of Programs XX Product & Solutions Team Manager BELGIUM PROXIMUS X Content Acquisition RTBF RADIO TELEVISION BELGE BELGIUM Content Acquisition Officer X COMMUNAUTE FRANCAISE BELGIUM VIEWCOM Managing
    [Show full text]