Years Since 1965. Botswana Elections Are Char

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Years Since 1965. Botswana Elections Are Char ELK ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE ISSN 2394-9392 (Online); DOI: 10.16962/EAPJSS/ISSN 2454-2997/2015; Volume 6 Issue 1 (2019) ON THE SIDELINES OF DEMOCRACY: PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES AND ELECTIONS IN BOTSWANA KEKGAODITSE SUPING Department of Political and Administrative Studies University of Botswana Gaborone, Botswana [email protected] ABSTRACT Botswana is one of the much celebrated democracies in Africa. The country holds regular elections every five (5) years since independence from Britain in 1966. Election observers have declared Botswana elections free and fair throughout the country’s electoral history despite the lack of representation and participation of some eligible groups of people such as persons with disabilities (PWDs). PWDs have registered the desire to realise their right to political participation, especially in elections, and no legislative or policy reforms have been effected in their favour. Furthermore, Botswana has ratified neither the United Nations Convention of 2006 on the Rights of People with Disabilities (CRPD) nor the 2007 African Charter on Democracy, Elections and Governance, both of which aim to promote, protect and provide access to PWDs’ right to political participation. Against this background, the article argues that; first, Botswana’s credentials as one of the most democratic states in Africa is flawed and exaggerated without the inclusion of PWDs in the electoral process. Second, the marginalization of PWDs from elections is entrenched in Botswana’s political culture of exclusion; third, the repeated declaration of Botswana elections as free and fair over the past fifty three (53) years, including the October 23, 2019 general elections, has legitimized the exclusion of PWDs. Fourth, PWDs in Botswana are victims of exploitation and ridicule by political parties, politicians and the government. Lastly, the article argues that there is lack of political will in Botswana to effect meaningful reforms to the realization of PWDs right to political participation through elections. Key words: Botswana, persons with disability, political participation, elections and democracy. Introduction Elections in Botswana have been a regular women and youth representation (Bauer phenomena every five (5) years since 2010, Bauer 2011; Maundeni & Suping 1965. Botswana elections are characterized 2013), political party leaders (Makgala by competition of various political parties 2005; ), political party coalitions and for political power, and have been hailed factions (Maundeni 2012; Lotshwao & as free and fair since the first general Suping 2013; Maundeni & Seabo 2013) elections. There is a lot of literature on and electoral reforms (Molomo 2004; Botswana elections focusing on various Maundeni 2007; Mpabanga & Mokhawa topics such as: political party contestations 2013). Furthermore, political parties have (Sebudubudu & Osei-Hwedie 2006; also produced manifestos to lobby various Burchard 2013; Seabo & Masilo 2018); groups of people to vote for them. Until elections (Danevad 1995; Charlton 1993); the 2014 general elections, political 19 ELK ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE ISSN 2394-9392 (Online); DOI: 10.16962/EAPJSS/ISSN 2454-2997/2015; Volume 6 Issue 1 (2019) parties’ manifestos made no mention of PWDs as a constituency. Various literature This article raises the following has been documented on the: rights arguments: first, Botswana’s credentials as (Dinokopila & Mmatli 2013; one of the most democratic states in Africa Mukhophadhyay & Moswela 2016; is flawed and exaggerated without explicit Pfumorodze & Fombad 2011); statistics inclusion of PWDs in the electoral process. (Mukamaambo et al 2003; Mmatli et al Second, marginalization of PWDs from the 2014); education, health and employment elections is entrenched in Botswana’s (WHO 1980; WHO 200; Dinokopila & political culture of excluding minorities; Mmatli 2013; Moswela & third, the repeated declaration of Botswana Mukhophadhyay 2011; Mpuang et al elections as free and fair over the past fifty 2015; Parsons et al 2015; Shumba & Abosi three (53) years has legitimized the 2011; Shumba & Taukobong 2009), exclusion of PWDs. Fourth, PWDs in exclusion (Ghai 2001a; Mmatli 2007), and Botswana are victims of exploitation and political participation (Suping & Moswela ridicule by political parties, as politicians 2017) of PWDs in Botswana. However, and the government often campaign for the available literature does not give elections in the name of PWDs, but ignore attention to participation and them once elected. Lastly, the article representation, or lack thereof, of PWDs in argues that there is lack of political will in Botswana elections and the impact of that Botswana to effect meaningful reforms on the development of democracy in that can ensure the realization of PWDs Botswana. right to political participation through elections. Drawing from the participatory democratic theory, the paper argues that Botswana’s This article is divided into five (5) democracy is merely theoretical as it sections. The first section discusses PWDs excludes some eligible participants such as and the right to political participation; PWDs from political decision-making. second section deals with PWDs, elections Pateman (1970), making a case for and representation in Botswana; third participatory democracy, argued that section evaluates the right of PWDs to “active participation enables citizens to secret ballot and access to voting; the self-develop, as well as engendering fourth section examines the Botswana’s positive psychological benefits including Independent Electoral Commission and feelings of political efficacy” (Pateman PWDs; the last section assesses 1970:104-105). However, Botswana’s declarations of Botswana elections as free elections have neglected participation of and fair and the electoral reforms. The PWDs and limited itself to empty political article relies on secondary sources of data. rhetoric, through consultations and policy An interpretive analysis of sources was pronouncements on PWDs, all of which employed to allow thick description and have nothing on political participation of the use of narrative form to invite the PWDs or ever get implemented. voices of those involved and to give Participation and representation of PWDs meaning to their experiences, in Botswana elections remains elusive. circumstances and preferences. 20 ELK ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE ISSN 2394-9392 (Online); DOI: 10.16962/EAPJSS/ISSN 2454-2997/2015; Volume 6 Issue 1 (2019) appropriate; guaranteeing the free expression of the will of persons with Persons with Disabilities and the Right disabilities as voters and to this end, to Political Participation where necessary, at their request, allowing The right to vote and to be voted as an assistance in voting by a person of their election candidate is an important feature own choice; participation in non- of democracy. Any state that claims to be governmental organizations and democratic ought to protect, promote and associations concerned with the public and provide access to citizens’ right to vote political life of the country, and in the and to be voted. PWDs, like any section of activities and administration of political the population in a state, have the right to parties.” (CRPD 2006:21) participate in elections and politics in general. Various protocols and treaties Furthermore, in Africa, the African have been established at the international Charter on Human and People’s Rights level to protect and promote the right of (ACHPR) and the African Charter on PWDs to political participation. These Democracy, Elections and Governance treaties include, amongst others, the (commonly referred to as the Democracy United Nations Convention on the Rights Charter), calls on African states to promote of People with Disabilities (CRPD), participation of PWDs in the governance International Covenant on Civil and process, and that includes elections Political Rights (ICCPR). Collectively, the (Democracy Charter, Article 31). The afore-mentioned treaties seek to protect the Protocol to the ACHPR on the Rights of rights of PWDs to political participation in PWDs in Africa was introduced by the general, and elections in particular. Article African Commission on Human and 29 of the CRPD on Political Participation People’s Rights in 2014, but only got and Public Life explicitly calls on state adopted in January 2018 and is yet to be parties to guarantee PWDs their political ratified by many African countries. rights and give them equal opportunity with others. Specifically, the Within the framework of both the CRPD aforementioned Article 29 provides that and Democracy Charter, some African states must guarantee the political rights of states made some reforms to their legal PWDs by: and electoral systems to include PWDs. “ensuring that voting procedures, facilities For instance, Ethiopia, Niger and Ghana and materials are appropriate, accessible introduced some measures that promote and easy to understand and use; participation of PWDs in elections, such as protecting the right of persons with the use of sign language interpreters, disabilities to vote by secret ballot in putting elections materials in braille elections and public referendums without format, making polling stations and intimidation, and to stand for elections, to polling booths accessible to PWDs effectively hold office and perform all (Suping and Moswela 2017). On the other public functions at all levels of hand, most African states have entrenched
Recommended publications
  • Youth and Electoral Participation in Botswana
    The African e-Journals Project has digitized full text of articles of eleven social science and humanities journals. This item is from the digital archive maintained by Michigan State University Library. Find more at: http://digital.lib.msu.edu/projects/africanjournals/ Available through a partnership with Scroll down to read the article. Pula: Botswana Journal of African Studies, Vol.14 NO.1 (2000) Youth and electoral participation in Botswana Tidimane Ntsabane & Chris Ntau Democracy Research Project University of Botswana Abstract This article focuses on the changing trends and patterns in the yoU/h's participation in the electoral process. It examines trends in electoral participation in general and that of the youth in particular and attempts an explanation. It draws on the results of accumulated surveys and opinion polls that have been conducted over the years by the Democracy Research Project (DRP) of the University of Botswana. The article argues that the reasons for the lower participation rates among the youth are to be found in traditional Tswana society's political culture that does not consider public affairs a domain for women and the yoU/h. This culture is reproduced by the major agencies of socialisation such as the family, school system, political parties and the media. Introduction Botswana's constitution embraces a liberal democratic system of government. This system enshrines in it among other principles participation by the general population, at least, in the electoral process. The country has experienced three decades of uninterrupted electoral democracy. It is against this background that this article assesses youth participation in the electoral process.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Sci 2020 Mogende Emmanuel.Pdf
    Africa’s ‘miracle state’? the intersection of political leaders and non-state actors in the greening of Botswana through wildlife Emmanuel Mogende Thesis presented for the Degree of DOCTOR of PHILOSOPHY Department of Environmental and Geographical Science University of Cape Town February 2020 University of Cape Town The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgement of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only. Published by the University of Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. University of Cape Town DECLARATION I, EMMANUEL MOGENDE, declare that the work contained in this thesis is my own original work and that it has not been previously submitted for a degree or any other qualification at this University or any other institution. Signature: Date: 10/02/2020 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS It would have not been possible to complete this dissertation without the support and assistance of a number of individuals who deserve to be mentioned. I am greatly indebted for the enormous support and wisdom of my supervisor and mentor Prof. Maano Ramutsindela who provided the much-needed guidance throughout the PhD journey. Maano always offered constructive feedback on my writing and ideas and more often encouraged me to sit back and be reflective as I write. This has greatly helped me to improve on my writing as well as strengthen the argument of the thesis. Special thanks also go to the Faculty of Science in the University of Cape Town and the University of Botswana for generously funding my PhD.
    [Show full text]
  • Election Update 2004 Botswana
    ELECTION UPDATE 2004 BOTSWANA number 3 17 January 2005 contents Introduction 1 Free and Fair Elections 2 How the International Press Saw the October Poll 2 New Cabinet 3 Botswana Election Audit 4 Election Results 7 Opposition Party Unity in the Making 16 Parliament Adjourns 18 References 19 Compiled by Sechele Sechele EISA Editorial Team Jackie Kalley, Khabele Matlosa, Denis Kadima Published with the assistance of NORAD and OSISA Introduction executive secretary of the Section 65A of the Constitution Independent Electoral of Botswana in 1997 (see Botswana has now been Commission of Botswana Constitution Amendment Act independent for more than 38 (IEC), Mr Gabriel Seeletso. No.18 of 1997); which also years, with one party at the provides for the composition of helm – the Botswana In an interview in his office and the Commission. Democratic Party (BDP). a week after having a week- Elections are held every five long meeting with the The Commission consists of a years in this land-locked, Independent Electoral chairperson (Justice Judge diamond-rich and peaceful state Commission of Botswana; John. Mosojane), deputy and they are always declared Seeletso has expressed chairman (Private Attorney free and fair. The 30 October complete satisfaction with the Omphemetsee Motumisi), and 2004 general elections in performance of his staff and the five other members appointed Botswana were no exception. Commission in correctly and by the Judicial Service competently conducting the Commission from a list of For purposes of this update on 2004 general elections. persons recommended by the the aftermath of the elections, The Independent Electoral All Party Conference.
    [Show full text]
  • The Big Governance Issues in Botswana
    MARCH 2021 THE BIG GOVERNANCE ISSUES IN BOTSWANA A CIVIL SOCIETY SUBMISSION TO THE AFRICAN PEER REVIEW MECHANISM Contents Executive Summary 3 Acknowledgments 7 Acronyms and Abbreviations 8 What is the APRM? 10 The BAPS Process 12 Ibrahim Index of African Governance Botswana: 2020 IIAG Scores, Ranks & Trends 120 CHAPTER 1 15 Introduction CHAPTER 2 16 Human Rights CHAPTER 3 27 Separation of Powers CHAPTER 4 35 Public Service and Decentralisation CHAPTER 5 43 Citizen Participation and Economic Inclusion CHAPTER 6 51 Transparency and Accountability CHAPTER 7 61 Vulnerable Groups CHAPTER 8 70 Education CHAPTER 9 80 Sustainable Development and Natural Resource Management, Access to Land and Infrastructure CHAPTER 10 91 Food Security CHAPTER 11 98 Crime and Security CHAPTER 12 108 Foreign Policy CHAPTER 13 113 Research and Development THE BIG GOVERNANCE ISSUES IN BOTSWANA: A CIVIL SOCIETY SUBMISSION TO THE APRM 3 Executive Summary Botswana’s civil society APRM Working Group has identified 12 governance issues to be included in this submission: 1 Human Rights The implementation of domestic and international legislation has meant that basic human rights are well protected in Botswana. However, these rights are not enjoyed equally by all. Areas of concern include violence against women and children; discrimination against indigenous peoples; child labour; over reliance on and abuses by the mining sector; respect for diversity and culture; effectiveness of social protection programmes; and access to quality healthcare services. It is recommended that government develop a comprehensive national action plan on human rights that applies to both state and business. 2 Separation of Powers Political and personal interests have made separation between Botswana’s three arms of government difficult.
    [Show full text]
  • African Union Election Observation Mission to the 2019 General Elections in the Republic of Botswana PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 25 October 2019 I
    AFRICAN UNION UNION AFRICAINE UNIÃO AFRICANA African Union Election Observation Mission to the 2019 General Elections in the Republic of Botswana PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 25 October 2019 I. INTRODUCTION 1. At the invitation of the Government of the Republic of Botswana and the Independent Electoral Commission (IEC), the Chairperson of the African Union Commission (AUC), H.E. Moussa Faki Mahamat deployed the African Union Election Observation Mission (AUEOM) to the country’s General Election held on 23 October 2019. The Mission is headed by H.E. Fatoumata Jallow Tambajang, Former Vice President and Minister of Women’s Affairs of the Republic of The Gambia. 2. The AUEOM comprised 30 observers drawn from the Pan-African Parliament (PAP), African Ambassadors accredited to the African Union (AU), Election Management Bodies (EMBs), independent electoral and governance experts and Civil Society Organizations (CSOs). The observers were drawn from 17 AU Member States namely: Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya, Liberia, Libya, Malawi, Mozambique, Nigeria, Rwanda, Saharawi Republic, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Tanzania, The Gambia, Uganda and Zimbabwe. 3. The AUEOM mandate is to observe the 23 October 2019 General Elections in line with relevant AU instruments, especially (a) the African Union Guidelines for Elections Observation and Monitoring Missions (2002); (b) the OAU/AU Declaration on Principles Governing Democratic Elections in Africa (2002); African Charter on Human and Peoples Rights (1981) and (c) African Charter on Democracy, Elections and Governance (2007), among others. The deployment of the AUEOM in the Republic of Botswana demonstrates the AU’s commitment to supporting democratic, credible, inclusive and peaceful electoral processes in its Member States by providing an objective assessment of the process and the political environment within which the elections were conducted.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 GENERAL ELECTIONS REPORT II Keireng A
    REPORT TO THE MINISTER FOR PRESIDENTIAL AFFAIRS, GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION ON THE 2019 GENERAL ELECTIONS 2019 GENERAL ELECTIONS I REPORT Honourable Justice Abednego B. Tafa Mr. John Carr-Hartley Members of CHAIRMAN DEPUTY CHAIRMAN The Independent Electoral Commission Mrs. Agnes Setlhogile Mrs. Shaboyo Motsamai Dr. Molefe Phirinyane COMMISSIONER COMMISSIONER COMMISSIONER Mrs. Martha J. Sayed Vacant COMMISSIONER COMMISSIONER 2019 GENERAL ELECTIONS REPORT II Keireng A. Zuze Doreen L. Serumula SECRETARY DEPUTY SECRETARY Executive Management of the Secretariat Keolebogile M. Tshitlho Dintle S. Rapoo SENIOR MANAGER MANAGER CORPORATE SERVICES ELECTIONS AFFAIRS & FIELD OPERATIONS Obakeng B. Tlhaodi Uwoga H. Mandiwana CHIEF STATE COUNSEL MANAGER HUMAN RESOURCE & ADMINISTRATION 2019 GENERAL ELECTIONS REPORT III Strategic Foundations ........................................................................................................................... I Members of The Independent Electoral Commission ................................................ II Executive Management of the Secretariat........................................................................... III Letter to The Minister for Presidential Affairs, Governance and Public Administration ............................................................................................................... 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.................................................................................................................. 2 ACRONYMS ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Botswana : Quels Défis Pour La Nouvelle Présidence Masisi ?
    Notes de l’Ifri Botswana : quels défis pour la nouvelle présidence Masisi ? Thibaud KURTZ Novembre 2018 Programme Afrique subsaharienne L’Ifri est, en France, le principal centre indépendant de recherche, d’information et de débat sur les grandes questions internationales. Créé en 1979 par Thierry de Montbrial, l’Ifri est une association reconnue d’utilité publique (loi de 1901). Il n’est soumis à aucune tutelle administrative, définit librement ses activités et publie régulièrement ses travaux. L’Ifri associe, au travers de ses études et de ses débats, dans une démarche interdisciplinaire, décideurs politiques et experts à l’échelle internationale. Les opinions exprimées dans ce texte n’engagent que la responsabilité de l’auteur. ISBN : 978-2-36567-942-8 © Tous droits réservés, Ifri, 2018 Couverture : Flag of Botswana with chalk color/Shutterstock.com Comment citer cette publication : Thibaud Kurtz, « Botswana : quels défis pour la prochaine présidence Masisi ? », Notes de l’Ifri, Ifri, novembre 2018. Ifri 27 rue de la Procession 75740 Paris Cedex 15 – FRANCE Tél. : +33 (0)1 40 61 60 00 – Fax : +33 (0)1 40 61 60 60 E-mail : [email protected] Site internet : Ifri.org Auteur Thibaud Kurtz est consultant indépendant et analyste en géopolitique africaine. Il a mené de nombreuses missions pour des réseaux d’ONG et diplomatiques européens en Afrique australe et des Grands Lacs. Après avoir travaillé au sein d’EurAc à Bruxelles, il a été basé au Botswana pendant plusieurs années, où il a occupé des postes régionaux pour les missions diplomatiques de la France, de l’Union Européenne et du Royaume-Uni.
    [Show full text]
  • In Search of an Alternative Electoral System for Botswana
    The African e-Journals Project has digitized full text of articles of eleven social science and humanities journals. This item is from the digital archive maintained by Michigan State University Library. Find more at: http://digital.lib.msu.edu/projects/africanjournals/ Available through a partnership with Scroll down to read the article. Pula: Botswana Journal of African Studies, Vol.14 NO.1 (2000) In search of an alternative electoral system for Botswana Mpho G. Molomo Democracy Research Project University of Botswana Abstract Electoral systems are manipulative instruments that determine how elections are won and lost. Botswana is widely regarded as a frontrunner in democratic politics,but the electoral system that it operates has been wanting in some respects. Tthe First-past-the-post system has helped to consolidate democratic practice, and also provides for an effective link between Members of Parliament and their constituencies, but empirical evidence suggests that it is the least democratic electoral system. Its winner-take-all practic distorts electoral outcomes, and often produces minority governments. The article proceeds to discuss proportional representation (PR) and semi-proportional representation, and outlines their strengths and weaknesses. The paper concludes that since both the FPTP system and PR systems have inherent limitations, the best system would be one that draws on the best aspects of each system. The anicle recommends a variation of the Mixed-Member Proportionality system. Introduction Political institutionsshape the rules of the gameunder whichdemocracyis practised,and it is often argued that the easiest political institutionto be manipulated,for good or bad, is the electoralsystem. [Thisis so] becausein translatingthe votescast in a generalelectionintoseats in the legislature,the choice of electoral systemcan effectivelydeterminewho is electedand whichparty gains power (Reynolds,A.
    [Show full text]
  • Governance and Elections: Enhancing Local Democracy in Botswana
    The African e-Journals Project has digitized full text of articles of eleven social science and humanities journals. This item is from the digital archive maintained by Michigan State University Library. Find more at: http://digital.lib.msu.edu/projects/africanjournals/ Available through a partnership with Scroll down to read the article. Pula: Botswana Journal of African Studies, Vol.14 No.1 (2000) Governance and elections: enhancing local democracy in Botswana Mogopod; Lekorwe Democracy Research Project University of Botswana Abstract This article discusses the extent to which local government is an institution of choice and voice. It argues that although the Botswana Local government system operates within the multi-party framework, it has severe constraints that limit its effectiveness. One of the major constraints which has been the subject of many government and scholarly documents is the low caliber of local leadership (councillors) as well as the under representation of certain groups in the political system such as women. These issues are highlighted in the paper including some innovations, which may be applied to further strengthen local democracy. The paper begins by examining the conceptual framework within which local democracy operates in Botswana. It then goes into describing that process including some shortcomings. Finally, the paper concludes by advocating some innovations to improve the system. Introduction The objectives of local government are diverse and differ from country to country and from one period to the other within a particular country. Local government as an institution is expected to provide a choice and act as a voice to express the needs and aspirations of the people.
    [Show full text]
  • 40 Years of Democracy in Botswana : 1965
    40 Years of Democracy in Botswana 1965-2005 EDITED BY ZIBANI MAUNDENI 40 Years of Democracy in Botswana: 1965 - 2005 First Published in 2005 by Mmegi Publishing House, P/Bag Br 298, Gaborone, Botswana ISBN: 99912-526-3-0 © Zibani Maundeni All rights reserved. The copyright of all materials in this publication, except where otherwise stated, remains the property of the author and publisher. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, for any purpose, without the express written permission of the publishers or in accordance with the provision of the copyright and neighbouring rights act of 2000. Cover design by: Resolution Layout and design by: Resolution Printed and bound by: Mills Litho, Cape Town, South Africa 40 Years of Democracy in Botswana 1965-2005 EDITED BY ZIBANI MAUNDENI ContentsCONTENTS Acknowledgements . .3 Contributors . .4 Introduction . .6 SECTION ONE Chapter One: Botswana’s democracy in a southern African regional perspective: progress or decline? Patrick Molutsi . .10 Chapter Two: Electoral systems and democracy in Botswana Mpho Molomo . .29 Chapter Three: The organisation of elections and institutional reforms Mogopodi Lekorwe and Onkemetse Tshosa . .50 Chapter Four: Transparency and settling of disputes in the Botswana electoral system David Sebudubudu . .59 SECTION TWO Chapter Five: Succession to high office: Tswana culture and modern Botswana politics Zibani Maundeni . .80 Chapter Six: Voters and electoral performance of political parties in Botswana Mpho Molomo and Wilford Molefe . .94 Chapter Seven: Organisation of political parties Mogopodi Lekorwe . .122 Chapter Eight: Funding of political parties: levelling the political playing field Mpho Molomo and David Sebudubudu .
    [Show full text]
  • Recentralizing Community Based Natural Resource Management in Botswana, 1996-2012
    African Studies Quarterly | Volume 15, Issue 1 | December 2014 Elephants are Like Our Diamonds: Recentralizing Community Based Natural Resource Management in Botswana, 1996-2012 PARAKH HOON Abstract: When the Botswana parliament passed a Community Based Natural Resource Management (CBNRM) policy in 2007, ten years after its implementation, the formal policy rejected some of the basic precepts of community based conservation—those who face the costs of living in close proximity to wildlife should receive a major share of benefits. In the national debate over the CBNRM policy, benefits from wildlife were seen analogous to diamonds to be shared by the nation. The paper explains how and why Botswana’s CBNRM policy took this direction through an analysis of three key aspects: subnational bureaucratic and community-level decision-making, national political economy and shifting coalition dynamics in a dominant one party system, and the contestation between transnational indigenous peoples’ networks and the Botswana government. By understanding the CBNRM process as it unfolded at the national, district, and local level over an extended period of time, the paper provides a longitudinal argument about CBNRM recentralization in Botswana. Introduction Use rights meant different things in practice. It was not any devolution of authority or development and management capacity at the local level. Rather, it was a complicated recipe for organizing villages by establishing by-laws for some form of decision-making into community-based organizations or trusts with a boilerplate set of rules. 1 The above statement reflects the frustration that conservationists have with community based approaches in natural resource management in Botswana and indeed elsewhere in Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Elections in Anglophone African Countries 41 Yolanda Sadie 4 5 3 Youth Participation in Anglophone Africa 79 Victoria Graham
    This book compares the progress ten select countries, all former colonies of Britain, have made towards the practice of democracy. The authors assess a range of indicators including the quality of elections, the impact of voter turnout, the importance of term limits, civil society’s various responsibilities, the presence of media freedoms, the impact of youth participation, accountability and the rising role of social media. These findings help illustrate the various periods within each country’s democracy from the immediate post-colonial experience, to the emergence of one-party states, to the surge of multi-party elections that are being influenced by key political figures and technology. This book will be of great interest to a broad readership including students of politics, international relations and history at tertiary educational institutions as well as the wider readership that is keen to understand what has shaped the post-colonial political experience of some key Anglophone African countries. Brittle Democracies? Heather A Thuynsma is a Lecturer in the Department of Political Sciences and Communications Manager for the Faculty of Humanities, University of Pretoria. THIS PAGE IS LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY Brittle Democracies? Comparing Politics in Anglophone Africa PB 1 ESI Press University of Pretoria, Lynwood Avenue, Hatfield, Pretoria, South Africa https://www.up.ac.za/faculty-of-humanities 2 Text copyright © ESI Press 2020 3 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any electronic or mechanical means, including photocopying and recording, or by any other information storage or retrieval system, without written permission from the publisher.
    [Show full text]